Record Finder / 24-003716-TT
Michigan
Mark W Mattingly, Petitioner V Township Of Grand Blanc, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Mark W Mattingly
- Respondent
- Township Of Grand Blanc
Case overview
- Docket number
- 24-003716-TT
- Status
- Hearing Set - SC
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Genesee
- Judge
- Klukowski, Nancy
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | Evidence was received. | RESP | Not recorded | 10/22/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 16 | Evidence was received. | RESP | Not recorded | 10/22/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 15 | Evidence was received. | RESP | Not recorded | 10/22/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 14 | Evidence was received. | RESP | Not recorded | 10/22/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 13 | Notice of Hearing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/12/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 12 | A hearing has been scheduled | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/12/2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| 11 | Order Setting Aside R Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 02/26/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 10 | Response to Order | Not recorded | Not recorded | 02/26/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | Order Holding Respondent in Default | Not recorded | 8 | 02/13/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | Order Requiring Information | Not recorded | Not recorded | 01/07/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Attachments to the Answer were filed | Not recorded | Not recorded | 12/12/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 12/12/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 12/11/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Order Holding Party in Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 11/20/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 10/09/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/09/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/25/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Record Card 12-24-651-008 corrected.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
Printed on 01/16/2026 Parcel Number: 12-24-651-008 Jurisdiction: GRAND BLANC TOWNSHIP ASSES County: Genesee Grantor Grantee Sale Price Sale Date Inst. Type Terms of Sale Liber & Page Verified By Prcnt. Trans. KATTOULA, ADNAN MATTINGLY, MARK & EBRAHIM 300,000 08/12/2005 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH NOT VERIFIED 100 SERRA, JULIE KATTOULA, ADNAN 155,000 09/10/2002 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH PROPERTY TRANSFER 100.00 WARWICK GROVES DEVELOPMEN SERRA, JOSEPH O & JULIE 90,000 01/16/1995 WD 21-NOT USED/OTHER 2563/108 PROPERTY TRANSFER Property Address 8476 WARWICK GROVES CT Owner's Name/Address MATTINGLY, MARK & EBRAHIM, SHAYHANA 8476 WARWICK GROVES CT GRAND BLANC, MI 48439-7426 Taxpayer's Name/Address MATTINGLY, MARK & EBRAHIM, SHAYHANA 8476 WARWICK GROVES CT GRAND BLANC, MI 48439-7426 Tax Description UNIT 8 WARWICK GROVES CONDOMINIUM (95) Comments/Influences 6/10/16 REINSP-MR. MATTINGLY. SPOT MEAS. CORRECT WINDOW TYPE AND BED COUNT. ADD PATIO BLOCKS, CPP, GENERATOR AND 1 FULL BATH AS O/P FOR 2017. MD/TW 07/07/09- LAND STILL VACANT FOR 2010. TO/AS Class: RESIDENTIAL-IMPRO Zoning: R1 Building Permit(s) Date Number Status School: GRAND BLANC COMM SCHOOLS NEW HOUSE 06/13/2014 PB140236 COMPLETE-MD P.R.E. 100% 01/06/2016 : 2024 Est TCV 1,556,496 TCV/TFA: 272.21 X Improved Vacant Public Improvements Dirt Road Gravel Road X Paved Road X Storm Sewer Sidewalk X Water X Sewer X Electric X Gas Curb Street Lights Standard Utilities Underground Utils. Topography of Site Level X Rolling Low High Landscaped Swamp Wooded Pond Waterfront Ravine Wetland Flood Plain X WALKOUT Who When What TW 06/10/2016 REINSP-HOM MD 12/28/2015 INSPECTED- MD 09/22/2015 INSPECTED Land Value Estimates for Land Table SEMSD.2024 GG/FAIRWAY/MD OF GB/PH/WG * Factors * Description Frontage Depth Front Depth Rate %Adj. Reason Value 2024 FRONT FOOT 96.03 896.33 1.0000 0.0000 773 100* 00 2024 PER ACRE 01.976 Acres 129,379 100.000 255,653 * denotes lines that do not contribute to the total acreage calculation. 96 Actual Front Feet, 1.98 Total Acres Total Est. Land Value = 255,653 Land Improvement Cost Estimates Description Rate Size % Good Cash Value D/W/P: 4in Concrete 10.04 506 91 4,623 D/W/P: Brick on Sand 27.48 121 94 3,125 Total Estimated Land Improvements True Cash Value = 7,748 Year Land Value Building Value Assessed Value Board of Review Tribunal/ Other Taxable Value 2024 127,800 650,400 778,200 778,200M 683,700C 2023 52,500 670,100 722,600 651,143C 2022 52,500 612,600 665,100 620,137C 2021 52,500 583,600 636,100 600,327C
Page 2
Parcel Number: 12-24-651-008 Printed on 01/16/2026 *** Information herein deemed reliable but not guaranteed*** parcel Number: 12-24-651-008 Printed on 01/16/2026 UNIT 8 86062.5 ft? S 0° 14' 47" W 237.07 588° 58'43"E 260.00 #***% Information herein deemed reliable but not guaranteed¥**
Page 3
Residential Building 1 of 1 Parcel Number: 12-24-651-008 Printed on 01/16/2026 (11) Heating/Cooling X Gas Oil Elec. Wood Coal Steam Forced Air w/o Ducts Forced Air w/ Ducts Forced Hot Water Electric Baseboard Elec. Ceil. Radiant Radiant (in-floor) Electric Wall Heat Space Heater Wall/Floor Furnace X Forced Heat & Cool Heat Pump No Heating/Cooling Central Air Wood Furnace (12) Electric 0 Amps Service No./Qual. of Fixtures Ex. X Ord. Min No. of Elec. Outlets Many X Ave. Few (13) Plumbing Average Fixture(s) 5 3 Fixture Bath 2 2 Fixture Bath Softner, Auto Softner, Manual Solar Water Heat No Plumbing Extra Toilet 1 Extra Sink 1 Separate Shower Ceramic Tile Floor Ceramic Tile Wains Ceramic Tub Alcove Vent Fan
Page 4
Pa
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Sales_Study_1 (5).pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
Grand Blanc Township 10/21/202 610:58 AM PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT 2026 GG/FAIRWAY/MD OF GB/PH/WG Current Assessed Sale Amount Bldg Type Year Built Living Area # of Beds # of Baths Parcel Number Sale Date Garage Acreage $/SqFt Street Address 12-24-601-002 6139 GAITWAY CT 07/26/22 700,000 2001 3,711 4 4& 1 892 0.824 328,500 1AND2 STY C $188.63 12-24-601-021 8251 PINE HOLLOW TRL 10/20/23 930,000 2004 4,789 6 6& 3 968 0.663 501,200 1AND2 STY C $194.20 12-24-601-041 6295 CANTER CREEK TRL 04/21/22 150,000 2021 5,230 5 5& 2 1,008 0.755 640,800 1AND2 STY C $28.68 12-24-602-029 6275 BRIDLE PATH 05/20/22 150,000 2022 5,721 4 3& 2 0 1.262 238,800 TWO-STORY $26.22 12-24-602-061 6145 SADDLE CREEK CT 01/20/23 1,250,000 2013 6,361 5 5& 2 1,434 0.153 605,800 1AND2 STY C $196.51 12-24-652-022 8298 MISTY MEADOWS 07/19/23 1,183,000 2015 5,260 4 4& 2 1,078 0.943 525,800 1AND2 STY C $224.90 12-26-601-002 5230 WARWICK WOODS TRL 09/08/22 380,000 1992 2,233 4 3& 0 698 0.489 216,400 RANCH $170.17 12-29-626-007 2342 VILLAGE WOODS DR 10/20/23 419,900 2004 2,591 4 3& 0 900 0.278 185,500 TWO-STORY $162.06 Count= 8 Sales Study
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
2024 BSA ENTERED SEMSD LAND TABLE.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
2024 LAND TABLE - SEMSD NEIGHBORHOOD Parcel Number Street Address Sale Date Sale Price Instr. Terms of Sale Adj. Sale $ 12-24-601-030 6215 CANTER CREEK TRL 04/28/21 $835,000 WD 19-MULTI PARCEL ARM'S LENGTH $835,000 12-24-602-023 WITHERS WAY 04/21/22 $150,000 MLC 03-ARM'S LENGTH $150,000 12-24-602-029 6275 BRIDLE PATH 05/20/22 $150,000 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $150,000 12-24-602-048 6305 WITHERS WAY CT 08/26/21 $125,000 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $125,000 12-25-601-009 8442 MISTY MEADOWS 12/29/21 $975,000 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $975,000 Totals: $2,235,000 $2,235,000 FINAL CONCLUSION FRONT FOOT $773 PER ACRE 1 ACRE $129,379 1.5 ACRE $194,069 2 ACRE $258,758 2.5 ACRE $323,447 3 ACRE $388,137 4 ACRE $517,516 5 ACRE $646,895 7 ACRE $905,653
Page 2
2024 LAND TABLE - SEMSD NEIGHBORHOOD Asd. when Sold Asd/Adj. Sale Cur. Appraisal Land Residual Est. Land Value Effec. Front Depth Net Acres Total Acres $404,100 48.40 $806,019 $128,981 $100,000 156.0 268.0 0.88 0.88 $57,500 38.33 $115,000 $150,000 $115,000 171.0 196.0 0.77 0.77 $57,500 38.33 $115,000 $150,000 $115,000 165.0 343.0 1.26 1.26 $57,500 46.00 $145,551 $125,000 $115,000 155.0 243.0 0.87 0.87 $405,100 41.55 $886,355 $88,645 $0 184.8 279.1 1.18 1.18 $981,700 $2,067,925 $642,626 $445,000 831.8 4.97 4.97 Sale. Ratio => 43.92 Average Average Std. Dev. => 4.55 per FF=> $773 per Net Acre=> 129,379.10
Page 3
2024 LAND TABLE - SEMSD NEIGHBORHOOD Dollars/FF Dollars/Acre Dollars/SqFt Actual Front ECF Area Liber/Page Other Parcels in Sale Land Table Gravel $827 $146,403 $3.36 156.00 PINEH 2.02105E+14 PINE HOLLOW ESTATES 0 $877 $194,301 $4.46 171.00 WOPIN 2.02205E+14 WOODS OF PINE HOLLOW 0 $909 $118,859 $2.73 165.00 WOPIN 2.02207E+14 WOODS OF PINE HOLLOW 0 $806 $144,009 $3.31 155.00 WOPIN 2.02109E+14 WOODS OF PINE HOLLOW 0 $480 $74,869 $1.72 184.80 MEDGB 2.02201E+14 MEADOWS OF GRAND BLANC 0 Average per SqFt=> $2.97
Page 4
2024 LAND TABLE - SEMSD NEIGHBORHOOD Paved Inspected Date Use Code Class Rate Group 1 Rate Group 2 Rate Group 3 Site Characteristics Access Water Supply 1 8/19/2020 401 STW-STREAM W/O 0 8/19/2020 402 SR-REGULAR SITE 0 12/21/2022 401 SR-REGULAR SITE 0 8/19/2020 401 SR-REGULAR SITE 1 6/27/2017 401
Page 5
2024 LAND TABLE - SEMSD NEIGHBORHOOD Sewer Property Restrictions Restriction Notes Waterfont View Waterfront Waterfront Name Waterfront Ownership
Page 6
2024 LAND TABLE - SEMSD NEIGHBORHOOD Waterfront Influences Bottom Character
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
2024 BSA ENTERED SEMSD ECF TABLE.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
2024 ECF NEIGHBORHOOD - SEMSD Parcel Number Street Address Sale Date Sale Price Instr. Terms of Sale Adj. Sale $ Asd. when Sold 12-11-507-007 5395 GOLDEN GATE BLVD 10/01/21 $600,000 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $600,000 $299,000 12-24-601-002 6139 GAITWAY CT 07/26/22 $700,000 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $700,000 $327,000 12-24-601-030 6215 CANTER CREEK TRL 04/28/21 $835,000 WD 19-MULTI PARCEL ARM'S LENGTH $835,000 $404,100 12-24-601-031 6223 CANTER CREEK TRL 02/07/22 $855,000 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $855,000 $398,900 12-24-602-061 6145 SADDLE CREEK CT 01/20/23 $1,250,000 WD 19-MULTI PARCEL ARM'S LENGTH $1,250,000 $690,900 12-24-652-023 8284 MISTY MEADOWS 04/30/21 $810,000 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $810,000 $312,100 12-25-601-009 8442 MISTY MEADOWS 12/29/21 $975,000 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $975,000 $405,100 12-25-601-012 8467 MISTY MEADOWS 11/17/21 $2,600,000 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $2,600,000 $1,043,100 Totals: $8,625,000 $8,625,000 $3,880,200 Sale. Ratio => Std. Dev. => FINAL CONCLUSION 0.669
Page 2
2024 ECF NEIGHBORHOOD - SEMSD Asd/Adj. Sale Cur. Appraisal Land + Yard Bldg. Residual Cost Man. $ E.C.F. Floor Area $/Sq.Ft. ECF Area 49.83 $775,419 $90,307 $509,693 $860,693 0.592 3,193 $159.63 GOLDG 46.71 $717,753 $16,208 $683,792 $1,002,207 0.682 3,711 $184.26 PINEH 48.40 $706,019 $39,973 $795,027 $965,284 0.824 4,159 $191.16 PINEH 46.65 $818,943 $19,486 $835,514 $1,142,081 0.732 3,941 $212.01 PINEH 55.27 $1,602,285 $105,439 $1,144,561 $1,906,358 0.600 6,361 $179.93 WOPIN 38.53 $859,549 $205,825 $604,175 $895,512 0.675 3,545 $170.43 MEDGB 41.55 $1,039,540 $166,213 $808,787 $1,196,338 0.676 4,700 $172.08 MEDGB 40.12 $2,853,521 $469,467 $2,130,533 $3,265,828 0.652 11,093 $192.06 MEDGB $9,373,029 $7,512,082 $11,234,302 $182.70 44.99 E.C.F. => 0.669 Std. Deviation=> 0.073816 5.57 Ave. E.C.F. => 0.679 Ave. Variance=> 5.0011
Page 3
2024 ECF NEIGHBORHOOD - SEMSD Dev. by Mean (%) Building Style Use Code Land Value Appr. by Eq. Appr. Date Other Parcels in Sale 8.6955 1AND2 STY COMB $90,307 No / / 0.3142 1AND2 STY COMB $0 No / / 14.4476 1AND2 STY COMB $0 No / / 5.2427 1AND2 STY COMB $0 No / / 7.8752 1AND2 STY COMB $39,331 No / / 12-24-602-060 0.4474 TWO-STORY $182,425 No / / 0.3092 TWO-STORY $153,185 No / / 2.6772 TWO-STORY $364,720 No / / 1.0470 Coefficient of Var=> 7.363889744
Page 4
2024 ECF NEIGHBORHOOD - SEMSD Land Table Property Class Building Depr. Site Characteristics Access Water Supply Sewer Property Restrictions GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB 401 98 PINE HOLLOW ESTATES 401 79 PINE HOLLOW ESTATES 401 79 PINE HOLLOW ESTATES 401 78 WOODS OF PINE HOLLOW 401 91 MEADOWS OF GRAND BLANC 401 77 MEADOWS OF GRAND BLANC 401 78 MEADOWS OF GRAND BLANC 401 83
Page 5
2024 ECF NEIGHBORHOOD - SEMSD Restriction Notes Waterfont View Waterfront Waterfront Name Waterfront Ownership Waterfront Influences Bottom Character
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
SubsequentFiling.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 24-003716 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? Yes Party Filing Document Respondent Files Document Type: Evidence Attachment File Name: 2024 BSA ENTERED SEMSD ECF TABLE Document Type: Evidence Attachment File Name: 2024 BSA ENTERED SEMSD LAND TABLE Document Type: Evidence Attachment File Name: Sales_Study_1 (5) Document Type: Evidence Attachment File Name: Record Card 12-24-651-008 corrected Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
SC_Notice_of_Telephonic_Hearing.2026-10-12_16-08-48.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Mark W Mattingly, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No.: 24-003716 Township Of Grand Blanc, Respondent. NOTICE OF TELEPHONE HEARING The Tribunal has scheduled a telephone hearing to be conducted as follows. Hearings are generally 30 minutes in length. HEARING DATE: December 9, 2026 HEARING TIME: 1:00 PM Eastern Time JOIN BY PHONE: 1-248-509-0316 ACCESS CODE: 731891219 This hearing will be held by telephone conference call with the Judge as the host. In order to join the hearing, call the phone number listed above at least 5 minutes prior to the hearing time. You will then be required to input the access code, followed by # to connect. The Tribunal judge will call in and join by phone at the hearing time. Failure to timely call in may result in the placement of a party or parties in default. This is an important legal document. Please have someone translate the document. Este es un documento legal importante. Por favor, haga traducir este documento. এটি একটি গুরুত্বপূর্ণ আইনি দলিল, অনুগ্রহ করে কেউ দলিলটিকে অনুবাদ করুন। .ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺛﻴﻘﺔ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻴﺔ ﻫﺎﻣﺔ ﻳﺮﺟﻰ ﻟﺪﻳﻚ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺗﺘﺮﺟﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﻴﻘﺔ Ito ay isang mahalagang legal na dokumento. Mangyari lamang na magkaroon ng isang tao isalin ang dokumento.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003716 Page 2 of 4 HEARING INFORMATION – PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY GENERAL INFORMATION: An impartial hearing will be conducted in accordance with the Michigan Tax Tribunal Rules (R 792.10201-R 792.10297) and the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act, MCL 24.201 et seq. The Michigan Rules of Evidence and the Michigan Court Rules may be applicable. Parties are expected to exercise proper respect and courtesy toward other parties, witnesses, and administrative law judges, which includes attending the hearing on time, silencing cell phones, and choosing a quiet, private location to participate in the hearing to limit distractions and ensure minimal background noise. The hearing may be recorded for notetaking purposes, but the recording is not a formal record, unless otherwise provided for by the Tribunal. REPRESENTATION: You may have an attorney or anyone else of your choice represent you at the hearing. The Tribunal does not recommend or appoint representatives for you and will not pay for your representative. WITNESSES: You may have anyone join you at the hearing to speak in support of your case. However, the time to present your case is limited and additional time may not be provided to accommodate witness testimony. DOCUMENTATION: Parties are required to submit all documents in support of their contentions to both the Tribunal and the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents were previously submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to both the Tribunal and the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be submitted to the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s electronic filing (e- filing) system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to submission by e-mail. If sent by mail, the documents must be sent to the opposing party or their
Page 3
MT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Order_Setting_Aside_R_Default.2025-02-26_11-04-36.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Mark W Mattingly, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003716 Township Of Grand Blanc, Respondent. ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Respondent was held in default on February 13, 2025, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE. By_________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: February 26, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Mark W Mattingly, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003716 Township Of Grand Blanc, Respondent. ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Respondent was held in default on February 13, 2025, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE. By_________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: February 26, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Mark W Mattingly, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003716 Township Of Grand Blanc, Respondent. ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Respondent was held in default on February 13, 2025, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Response.Default.022625.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 STATE OF MICHGIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFARIS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION MARK MATTINGLY, Petitioner, MTT DOCKET NO: 24-003716 vs GRAND BLANC TOWNSHIP, Respondent. PRO PER WILLIAM E. DELZER, PLC Mark W. Mattingly William E. Delzer (P68488) Petitioner Attorney for Respondent 8476 Warwick Groves Court 8332 Office Park Drive, Suite B Grand Blanc, Michigan 48439 Grand Blanc, MI 48439 (810) 569-0428 (810) 603-1000 ma%ng2@msu.edu wdelzer@delzerlegal.com ______________________________________________________________________________ PROVIDING INFORMATION PERTAINING TO DEFAULT Grand Blanc Township (“Respondent”), through its attorneys, William E. Delzer, answers as follows: 1. On December 11, 2024, an Answer was filed by the undersigned. 2. On December 12, 2024, an Answer was filed by the Assessor for the Respondent. 3. While both individuals are part of the Respondent’s team for this appeal, please refer to the first Answer provided. 4. The information sent with the Second Answer will be resubmitted.
Page 2
2 Dated: February 26, 2025 Respectfully submitted, DELZER LEGAL WILLIAM E. DELZER P68488 Attorney for Respondent
Page 3
3 STATE OF MICHGIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFARIS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL RA SUMMIT, LLC, Petitioner, MTT DOCKET NO: 24-001194 vs DAVISON TOWNSHIP, Respondent. HONIGMAN, LLP WILLIAM E. DELZER, PLC Stewart L. Mandell (P33781) William E. Delzer (P68488) Attorney for Petitioner Attorney for Respondent 39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101 8332 Office Park Drive, Suite B Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151 Grand Blanc, MI 48439 (313) 465-7420 (810) 603-1000 slmandell@honigman.com wdelzer@delzerlegal.com ______________________________________________________________________________ AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Respondent Township of Davison asserts the following affirmative defenses: 1. Petitioner fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. 2. The Tribunal is charged with finding a property’s true cash value to determine the property’s lawful assessment. Alhi Dev Co v Orion Twp, 110 Mich App 764,767 (1981). 3. Petitioner has the burden of establishing the property’s true cash value. See MCL 205.737(3) and Kern v Pontiac Twp, 93 Mich App 612 (9174). 4. Petitioner has failed to allege that the mode and method of assessing the subject property fails to conform to the mode and method applied in the case of all other properties in Respondent’s taxing unit for the year in question.
Page 4
4 5. Petitioner failed to show that any factor other than fifty percent (50%) was applied to the true cash value of Petitioner’s property, as well as others, to arrive at the respective assessments appearing on the roll, and also fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegations that the property’s taxable value is improper. 6. Petitioner asks the Tribunal to grant it preference by application of a self- chosen method of assessment contrary to the intent, purpose, and law of this State. 7. Petitioner, in essence, asks the Tribunal to grant it an illegal preference by application of a method of assessment different from that employed in the
Page 5
5
Page 6
6
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
24-003716 Default.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Mark W Mattingly, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003716 Grand Blanc Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER HOLDING RESPONDENT IN DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that it entered an Order Requiring Information on January 7, 2025. Respondent filed two answers listing two separate authorized representatives on December 11 and December 12, 2024. Respondent was required to file information or documentation establishing who is its authorized representative in this appeal. To date, no response has been received. Respondent has failed to comply with a Tribunal order and is therefore subject to default.1 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is held in DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent must complete the following to cure the default: file documentation establishing who is Respondent’s authorized representative, as previously required by the January 7, 2025 order. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this Order.2 Failure to comply with this Order will result in Respondent being required to file a motion to set aside the default. Entered: February 13, 2025 By _____________________________ bw 1 TTR 231. 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 219(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003716 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
24-003716.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Mark W Mattingly, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003716 Grand Blanc Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER REQUIRING INFORMATION The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Respondent filed two answers in response to the petition. The first answer, filed on December 11, 2024, was filed by William E. Delzer on behalf of Grand Blanc Township. The second answer, filed on December 12, 2024, was filed by Danyelle Herrington, also on behalf of Grand Blanc Township. As such, the Tribunal is unsure who the proper representative is. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent shall file documentation indicating who has authority to file the answer on behalf of Respondent within 14 days of entry of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order may result in Respondent being held in default, as provided by TTR 231. Entered: January 7, 2025 By _____________________________ sw/jcr PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Mark Mattingly 24003716TT.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
Ey ns dal STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON i. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR MARK MATTINGLY , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. 24-003716-TT TOWNSHIP OF GRAND BLANC Respondent(s) PROOF OF SERVICE DULCEE RANTA states that on 12/12/2024 he/she [Name of person serving/mailing petition] [date of service] served a copy of the RESPONDENT'S ANSWER relative to the above-captioned matter upon: [Provide name and address of the party/people being served] MARK MATTINGLY 8476 WARWICK GROVES CT GRAND BLANC MI 48439 Dey [IP gihe [Signature of person who is sefving/mailing copy] DULCEE RANTA [Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy]
Page 2
P
Parcel Number:
12-24-651-008
Jurisdiction:
GRAND BLANC TOWNSHIP
County:
GENESEE
[Grantor
Grantee
|
sale
sale
Inst.
Terms
of Sale
Liber
[
Price
Date
Type
& Page
[xaTTOULA,
ADNAN
MATTINGLY,
MARK
& EBRAHIM
|
300,000|
08/12/2005
|WD
03-ARM'S
LENGTH
|
| SERRA,
JULIE
KATTOULA,
ADNAN
|
155,000|
09/10/2002
|WD
03-ARM'S
LENGTH
| WARWICK GROVES DEVELOPMEN
|SERRA,
JOSEPH
O
&
JULIE
|
90,000|
01/16/1995
[WD
21-NOT USED/OTHER
2563/108
|
|
|
|
|
|Property Address
Class:
RESIDENTIAL-IMPRO |Zoning:
R1
Building
Permit (s)
Date
|
|
|
18476 WARWICK GROVES
CT
School:
GRAND BLANC COMM SCHOOLS
NEW HOUSE
|
06/13/20
|
P.R.E.
100% 01/06/2016
|
|Ownez's Name/Address
A
MATTINGLY, MARK
& EBRAHIM, SHAYHANA
[T2024 Bst TCV 1,556,496 TCV/TFA: 272.21
8476 RARAICK, CROvEe or
qd
|
[Vacant
Tand Val
timates
ble
SEMSD.2024 GG/
GRAND BLANC
MI
48439-7426
|
¥ [Improve
[|
|
acan
|
Lani
alue
Estimy
te
for
able
SEMSD.
G
|
Public
|
* Factors
*
|
Improvements
| Description
Front
Depth
Rate
[Tanpayer’s Name/Address
TT Road
| 2024 FRONT RE
1.0000 0.0000
773
cravEl MBAd
| 2024 PER ACRE
:
1.976 Acres 129,379
MATTINGLY,
MARK
& EBRAHIM,
SHAYHANA
X
|paved Road
i
that
do not contribute
to the to
fT Es Tie
%
|storm Sewer
¢ Feet,
1.98 Total Acres
Total
©
B
Sidewalk
X
|Water
i
{
%X
Sewer
r
ert Cost Estimates
omni) i
3 rea
big, concret
10704
[UNIT
8 WARWICK GROVES CONDOMINIUM
(95)
X
|Gas
x
ad
:
I
Curb
£k
on Sand
27.48
|Comments/Influences
|
.
|street Lights
Total Estimated Land Improvements
[6/10/16 REINSP-MR.
MATTINGLY.
SPOT MEAS.
Standard Utilitie,
|CORRECT WINDOW TYPE AND BED COUNT.
ADD
Underground Utils
|
Woy
k Description
for
Permit
PB140236,
Issued 06/13
|paTIO BLOCKS,
CPP,
GENERATOR AND
1
FULL
g
| COMPLETE
FOR 2016.MD
BATH AS
O/P
FOR 2017.
MD/TW
.
Topography
of
22-2014
INSP,MEAS,30% COMPLETE
FOR 2015.MD
<
Site
i
|
Level
X
|Rolling
Low
High
Land&aped
|
Swa
Wood:
Pond
[
Waterf.
Ravine
Wetland
—
Flood Plain
|Year
Land
Building
Assessed
X
[WALKOUT
|
Value
Value
Value
Who
When
What
2024
127,800
650,400
778,200
TW
06/10/2016 REINSP-HOM
[2023
52,500
670,100
722,600
|The Equalizer.
Copyright
(c)
1999
- 2009.|MD
12/28/2015 INSPECTED- 3522
52,500
612,600
665,100
|Licensed
To:
Township
of Grand Blanc,
MD
09/22/2015 INSPECTED
!
|county of Genesee,
Michigan
|2021
|
52,500
583,600
636,100
+%%
Information herein deemed reliable
but
not guaranteed***Page 3
Residential Building 1 of 1 Parcel Number: 12-24-651-008 Pr Building Type (3) Roof (cont.) (11) Heating/Cooling (15) Built-ins (15) Fireplaces (16) Por X |Single
Page 4
“par
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
05._Property_Tax_Appeal_Answer_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.287b9ef9-f289-47b3-b020-f6de844d4799.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-003716 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Township Of Grand Blanc (GENESEE) First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Danyelle M.I. Last Name Herington Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 5371 S Saginaw St P.O. Box 1833 City or Town Grand Blanc State Michigan ZIP Code 48480 Telephone Number 810-424-2676 Fax Number E-mail Address herington@gbtgov.com Section 3: Subject Property Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. N/A Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PLEASE FIND ATTACHED PDF WITH PROOF OF SERVICE, LAND VALUE ANALYSIS, ECF ANALYSIS, RECORD CARD, AND SALES RATIO ANALYSIS Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? March*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, cite the Board’s authority. Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? If yes, explain. Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? If so, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
05._Property_Tax_Appeal_Answer_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.33a5ae81-43f4-4238-b166-9b2a54bef966.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-003716 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Township Of Grand Blanc (GENESEE) First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name William M.I. E Last Name Delzer Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 8332 Office Park Drive Suite B City or Town Grand Blanc State Michigan ZIP Code 48439 Telephone Number 810-603-1000 Fax Number E-mail Address wdelzer@delzerlegal.com Section 3: Subject Property Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? Yes Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. N/A Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR 1. Petitioner fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. 2. Petitioner has the burden of establishing the property’s TCV. See MCL 205.737(3) and Kern v Pontiac Twp, 93 Mich App 612 (9174). 3. Petitioner has failed to allege that the mode and method of assessing the subject property fails to conform to the mode and method applied in the case of all other properties in Respondent’s taxing unit for the year in question. 4. Petitioner failed to show that any factor other than fifty percent (50%) was applied to the TCV of Petitioner’s property, as well as others, to arrive at the respective assessments appearing on the roll, and also fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegations that the property’s TV is improper. 6. Petitioner, in essence, asks the Tribunal to grant it an illegal preference by application of a method of assessment different from that employed in the assessment of other properties in Respondent’s taxing unit. WHEREFORE, Respondent prays that this Honorable Tribunal affirm the 2024 assessment and taxable value of the subject property and award Respondent costs. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? March*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, cite the Board’s authority. Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, explain. Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? If so, what is the issue date? IF
Page 3
STATE
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Order_Holding_Party_in_Default.2024-11-20_15-48-36.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Mark W Mattingly, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003716 Township Of Grand Blanc, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent has failed to file an answer. See TTR 279. Respondent must file an answer within 14 days of the entry of this Order. Small Claims answer forms can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this Order.i Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By:_______________________________ Entered: November 20, 2024 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003716 Page 2 of 6 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 219(5)
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Mark W Mattingly, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003716 Township Of Grand Blanc, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent has failed to file an answer. See TTR 279. Respondent must file an answer within 14 days of the entry of this Order. Small Claims answer forms can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated
Page 4
MTT
Page 5
S
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Mattingly.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED
JUL 39 2024
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON |. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL
Do not use this form to appsal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or
Non-Property tax disputes.
Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal
(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not
submit this document, you may be held in default.
Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information
First Name
ML
Last Name/Company Name
Mark
W
Mattingly
Mailing Address (No., Strest, P.O, Box or Rural Route)
8476 Warwick Groves Ct
|
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Grand Blanc
MI
48439
|
Telephone Number
Fax Number
|
810 569-0428
E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mall}
|
Matting2@msu.edu
Section 2: Petitioner's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
}
First Name
Ml.
Last Name
|
Firm Name {if any)
|
|
Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route}
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Telephone Number
Fax Number
E-mail Address (do not enter uniess you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)
Section 3: Subject Property Information
How many
If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?
parcelsareyou | [| vest
[] No
appealing?
*If yes, use a muitiple parcel form for informatlon regarding any contiguous parcels.Page 2
Eres STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check ali that apply) [Tl True Cash and Taxable Values [J Poverty Exemption Taxable Value Only (calculation) [J Disabled Veterans Exemption [7 Uncapping of Taxable Value 0 Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) [J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a O classification Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 2021 $686,100 +5.8%; 2022 $665,100 + 4.6% 2023 $722,600 + 8.6%. and this year the assessed value went up even more from %722,600 to $778,200 with a taxable value increase from $651,143 to $683,700. All of this despite housing prices falling to where the Zillow.com value for the house since it was built 8 years ago, has fallen over $250,000. This year, the land value was raised from $52,500 to $127,800. This is why | tried to appeal the assessment. Property values in the area have dropped significantly but the assement values have risen as shown above. In todays economy, Businesses struggle, this includes my own. every one is wanting a pound of flesh but Grand Blanc Township is asking for 5. Please stand up to these rediculous increases and support the people of this great State. When | appealed the assessment locally, there was no concideration of my concerns. Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Year(s) you are appealing: inaccurate assessment value for the current and recent market Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes [mi] No If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: March July a December If No, check the applicable reason(s): Not required to attend
Page 3
STATE OF
Page 4
ST
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
SC_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2024-10-09_11-01-08.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Mark W Mattingly, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003716 Township Of Grand Blanc, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: October 9, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Mark W Mattingly, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003716 Township Of Grand Blanc, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: October 9, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Mattingly.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED
JUL 39 2024
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON |. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL
Do not use this form to appsal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or
Non-Property tax disputes.
Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal
(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not
submit this document, you may be held in default.
Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information
First Name
ML
Last Name/Company Name
Mark
W
Mattingly
Mailing Address (No., Strest, P.O, Box or Rural Route)
8476 Warwick Groves Ct
|
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Grand Blanc
MI
48439
|
Telephone Number
Fax Number
|
810 569-0428
E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mall}
|
Matting2@msu.edu
Section 2: Petitioner's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
}
First Name
Ml.
Last Name
|
Firm Name {if any)
|
|
Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route}
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Telephone Number
Fax Number
E-mail Address (do not enter uniess you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)
Section 3: Subject Property Information
How many
If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?
parcelsareyou | [| vest
[] No
appealing?
*If yes, use a muitiple parcel form for informatlon regarding any contiguous parcels.Page 2
Eres STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check ali that apply) [Tl True Cash and Taxable Values [J Poverty Exemption Taxable Value Only (calculation) [J Disabled Veterans Exemption [7 Uncapping of Taxable Value 0 Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) [J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a O classification Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 2021 $686,100 +5.8%; 2022 $665,100 + 4.6% 2023 $722,600 + 8.6%. and this year the assessed value went up even more from %722,600 to $778,200 with a taxable value increase from $651,143 to $683,700. All of this despite housing prices falling to where the Zillow.com value for the house since it was built 8 years ago, has fallen over $250,000. This year, the land value was raised from $52,500 to $127,800. This is why | tried to appeal the assessment. Property values in the area have dropped significantly but the assement values have risen as shown above. In todays economy, Businesses struggle, this includes my own. every one is wanting a pound of flesh but Grand Blanc Township is asking for 5. Please stand up to these rediculous increases and support the people of this great State. When | appealed the assessment locally, there was no concideration of my concerns. Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Year(s) you are appealing: inaccurate assessment value for the current and recent market Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes [mi] No If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: March July a December If No, check the applicable reason(s): Not required to attend
Page 3
STATE OF
Page 4
ST
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.