24-003716 Default.pdf
Mark W Mattingly, Petitioner V Township Of Grand Blanc, Respondent · 24-003716-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Mark W Mattingly, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003716 Grand Blanc Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER HOLDING RESPONDENT IN DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that it entered an Order Requiring Information on January 7, 2025. Respondent filed two answers listing two separate authorized representatives on December 11 and December 12, 2024. Respondent was required to file information or documentation establishing who is its authorized representative in this appeal. To date, no response has been received. Respondent has failed to comply with a Tribunal order and is therefore subject to default.1 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is held in DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent must complete the following to cure the default: file documentation establishing who is Respondent’s authorized representative, as previously required by the January 7, 2025 order. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this Order.2 Failure to comply with this Order will result in Respondent being required to file a motion to set aside the default. Entered: February 13, 2025 By _____________________________ bw 1 TTR 231. 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 219(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003716 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk