Drf5 Qozb LLC, Petitioner V City Of Detroit, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Drf5 Qozb LLC
- Respondent
- City Of Detroit
Case overview
- Docket number
- 24-003692-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Wayne
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | Order of Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 01/14/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 13 | Order Holding Party in Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 12/19/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 12 | Failed to Appear - Petitioner | Not recorded | Not recorded | 12/18/2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| 11 | Evidence was received. | RESP | Not recorded | 11/25/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 10 | Notice of Hearing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/24/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | A hearing has been scheduled | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/24/2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| 8 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 11/04/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Notice of Filing | Not recorded | 5 | 11/04/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Attachments to the Answer were filed | RESP | 5 | 10/23/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 10/23/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Filing Fee Received | PET | Not recorded | 10/14/2024 | $125.00 | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/08/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/18/2024 | $0.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 DRF5 QOZB LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No.24-003692 City of Detroit, Respondent. ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner was placed in default on December 19, 2025, for failing to appear at a duly- scheduled hearing. Even though Petitioner failed to comply with the order, the Tribunal must consider Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury1 prior to the dismissal of this case. In Grimm, the Michigan Court of Appeals summarized factors that the Tribunal must consider before imposing the sanction of dismissal. Those factors are: (1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) the degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) attempts to cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better serve the interests of justice.2 Petitioner’s failure to appear at the hearing and failure to comply with the Order of Default has established a history of deliberate delay. As a result, giving careful consideration to the factors involved and considering all options in determining what sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser sanction would not be appropriate. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 1 Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 2 Id. at 149.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003692 Page 2 of 4 APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. By:___________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: January 14, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 DRF5 QOZB LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No.24-003692 City of Detroit, Respondent. ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner was placed in default on December 19, 2025, for failing to appear at a duly- scheduled hearing. Even though Petitioner failed to comply with the order, the Tribunal must consider Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury3 prior to the dismissal of this case. In Grimm, the Michigan Court of Appeals summarized factors that the Tribunal must consider before imposing the sanction of dismissal. Those factors are: (1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) the degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) attempts to cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better serve the interests of justice.4
Page 4
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 DRF5 QOZB LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003692 City of Detroit, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that Petitioner failed to appear for the duly-noticed hearing scheduled for December 18, 2025. Thus, this case is subject to dismissal or a default hearing.1 Prior to dismissal or the scheduling of a default hearing, however, the Tribunal finds that placing the absent party in default and ordering an explanation and documentation justifying the absence at the proceeding is appropriate.2 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the absent party is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall submit information and documentation as directed above. The response must be filed with the Tribunal and served on the opposing party or the opposing party’s authorized representative within 14 days of entry of this order.3 Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this case or the scheduling of a default hearing, as provided by TTR 237. By______________________________ Entered: December 19, 2025 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair 1 See TTR 247 & TTR 275. 2 See TTR 231 and See Grimm v Department of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003692 Page 2 of 4 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 DRF5 QOZB LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003692 City of Detroit, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that Petitioner failed to appear for the duly-noticed hearing scheduled for December 18, 2025. Thus, this case is subject to dismissal or a default hearing.4 Prior to dismissal or the scheduling of a default hearing, however, the Tribunal finds that placing the absent party in default and ordering an explanation and documentation justifying the absence at the proceeding is appropriate.5 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the absent party is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall submit information and documentation as directed above. The response must be filed with the Tribunal and served on the opposing party or the opposing party’s authorized representative within 14 days of entry of this order.6 Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this case or the scheduling of a default hearing, as provided by TTR 237. By______________________________ Entered: December 19, 2025 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair 4 See TTR 247 & TTR 275. 5 See TTR 231 and See Grimm v Department of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 6 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is
Page 4
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-003692 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City of Detroit (Wayne) First Name isaac M.I. Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government degraffenreid Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2 woodward City or Town detroit State Michigan ZIP Code 48226 Telephone Number 313-658-4711 Fax Number E-mail Address degraffenreidi@detroitmi.gov Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name M.I. Last Name Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address Section 3: Subject Property Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. N/A Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR attached is the valuation disclosure Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, cite the Board’s authority. Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? If yes, explain. Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? If so, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 22121917 Classification of Property: Real Residential Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: n/a Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: n/a What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? n/a Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. n/a If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ isaac degraffenreid
Page 4
Comparable Analysis Report 11/25/2025 10:32 AM For Subject Parcel 22121917. 1/2 Feature Subject Comparable # 1 poriiiie . Comparable # 2 pt Comparable # 3 EET. Parcel Number 22121917, 22121974, 22121160. 22121149.002 Se 2 - SE 1 of wo —r a : : rm roms eo Address 18988 RIVERVIEW 18517 RIVERVIEW © 19361 SHIAWASSEE 19831 SHIAWASSEE Neighborhood/Location 1R106 1R106 0 1R106 0 1R106 0 Appraisal/Sale Date 12/31/2022 05/12/2023 08/11/2023 0 01/04/2023 0 Land Value 504 2,159 868 0 883 0 Assessed Value 31,600 32,500 32,200 27,500 Year Built 1922 1926 1955 0 1953 Quality c - 0 c 0 c Style SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY 0 SINGLE FAMILY 0 SINGLE FAMILY Bedrooms 0 A 0 0 0 0 Full Baths 1 0 1 0 1 Half Baths 0 0 0 0 0 Square Feet 1,152 Hl 1,050 997 3,875 984 Garage Square Feet 0 jy -7,200 440 -6,600 0 Basement Square Feet i 768 888 -1,800 997 -3,435 984 Fin Basement Sq. Feet 0 - 0 0 0 0 984 Actual Sale Price $/Sq.Ft.: 47.57 52,800 $/Sq.Ft.: 175.53 | 175,000 $/Sq.Ft: 89.43 88,000 Net Adjustments Net Adj. -15.1% -7,950 Net Adj. -3.5% -6,160 Net Adj. -10.1% -8,880 Gross Adjustments Gross Adj. 19.0% 10,050 Gross Adj. 7.9% 13,910 Gross Adj. 19.6% 17,280 | Adjusted Sale Price $/Sq.Ft.: 40.41 44,850 $/Sq.Ft.:
Page 5
Com
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 DRF5 QOZB LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No.: 24-003692 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF TELEPHONE HEARING The Tribunal has scheduled a telephone hearing to be conducted as follows. Hearings are generally 30 minutes in length. HEARING DATE: December 18, 2025 HEARING TIME: 11:30 AM EST JOIN BY PHONE: 1-248-509-0316 ACCESS CODE: 734717059 This hearing will be held by telephone conference call with the Judge as the host. In order to join the hearing, call the phone number listed above at least 5 minutes prior to the hearing time. You will then be required to input the access code, followed by # to connect. The Tribunal judge will call in and join by phone at the hearing time. Failure to timely call in may result in the placement of a party or parties in default. This is an important legal document. Please have someone translate the document. Este es un documento legal importante. Por favor, haga traducir este documento. এটি একটি গুরুত্বপূর্ণ আইনি দলিল, অনুগ্রহ করে কেউ দলিলটিকে অনুবাদ করুন। .ةقيثولا مجرتت صخش كيدل ىجري ةماه ةينوناق ةقيثو وه اذه Ito ay isang mahalagang legal na dokumento. Mangyari lamang na magkaroon ng isang tao isalin ang dokumento.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003692 Page 2 of 12 HEARING INFORMATION – PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY GENERAL INFORMATION: An impartial hearing will be conducted in accordance with the Michigan Tax Tribunal Rules (R 792.10201-R 792.10297) and the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act, MCL 24.201 et seq. The Michigan Rules of Evidence and the Michigan Court Rules may be applicable. Parties are expected to exercise proper respect and courtesy toward other parties, witnesses, and administrative law judges, which includes attending the hearing on time, silencing cell phones, and choosing a quiet, private location to participate in the hearing to limit distractions and ensure minimal background noise. The hearing may be recorded for notetaking purposes, but the recording is not a formal record, unless otherwise provided for by the Tribunal. REPRESENTATION: You may have an attorney or anyone else of your choice represent you at the hearing. The Tribunal does not recommend or appoint representatives for you and will not pay for your representative. WITNESSES: You may have anyone join you at the hearing to speak in support of your case. However, the time to present your case is limited and additional time may not be provided to accommodate witness testimony. DOCUMENTATION: Parties are required to submit all documents in support of their contentions to both the Tribunal and the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents were previously submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to both the Tribunal and the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be submitted to the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s electronic filing (e- filing) system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to submission by e-mail. If sent by mail, the documents must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized representative at the address identified in the petition or answer for that party or authorized representative, unless the party or authorized representative filed an appearance or other documentation identifying a different mailing address. The documents do not need to be resubmitted after the Notice of Hearing if they were previously submitted to the Tribunal and the opposing party in this case. If a hearing had previously been scheduled in this case and adjourned, and the adjournment order indicates that the parties are precluded from submitting any further documentary evidence, no further documentary evidence will be accepted even if filed and exchanged as indicated above. INCLUSION OF SUBSEQUENT TAX YEARS: Subsequent tax year assessments are automatically included in valuation appeals once the assessment has been established for that tax year. For purposes of administrative efficiency, the Tribunal considers this date April 1st. As such, the parties should submit documentation and be prepared to discuss subsequent tax year assessments at hearings to be conducted on or after April 1st in a subsequent year. If the hearing is to be conducted prior to April 1st in a subsequent year, taxpayers are required to file a new petition and, if necessary, protest the subsequent tax year assessment at the March Board of Review for that year. MOTIONS/REQUESTS: A motion is a written request filed by a party asking the Tribunal to take certain action. The following motions and requests may be filed by either party regarding the scheduled hearing. Motions and requests may be submitted to the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Motions and requests may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to submission by e-mail. If sent by mail, motions and requests must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized representative at the address
Page 3
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
SS
RECEIVED
.
AL
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUN
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON |, BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL
Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or
Non-Property tax disputes.
Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal
(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not
submit this document, you may be held in default,
Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information
First Name
Mi
Last Name/Company Name
DRF5 QOZB, LLC
Mailing Address {No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural! Route)
23875 MICHIGAN AVENUE, SUITE 539
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
DEARBORN
Mi
48124
Telephone Number
Fax Number
423-838-4355
1-855-831-4166
E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mal)
DJ@NESSUSA.COM
Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
]
First Name
Ml.
Last Name
DHEERAJ
MATHEW
Firm Name (If any)
Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
4430 TILLY MILL ROAD, UNIT 307
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
DUNWOODY
GA
| 30360
Telephone Number
Fax Number
423-838-4355
1-855-831-4166
E-mall Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)
DJ@NESSUSA.COM
Section 3: Subject Property Information
How many
If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?
parcels are you | [7] yes*
No**
appealing?
*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.
**if no, you must fife separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted.Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check
a that apply)
True Cash and Taxable Value
{0 Poverty Exemption
[7 Taxable Value Only (calculation)
[1 Disabled Veterans Exemption
[3 uncapping of Taxable Value
[1 Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA)
[J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a
Classification
Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption)
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
PROPERTY WAS PURCHASED FOR ONLY $36,264 IN 2022.
SALES IN AREA OF SIMILAR PROPERTIES:
- 16216 PATTON ST; $33,000 ON 8/9/2023
- 18481 KENTFIELD; $34,000 ON 6/30/2023
Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
Year(s) you are appealing:
N/A
Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [Hl] Yes
[Hl] No
If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [I] March
[m] July
[i] December
if No, check the applicable reason(s):
[1 Not required to attend
Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner
[mn] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5)
0 Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order
0 Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of UncappingPage 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 7: Valuation Information use he multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 22121917. Classification of Property: Real Personal (check one) Agricultural Commercial Industrial re Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) [4 Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: $31,600 Current Taxable Value as estabfished by the BOR: $26,670 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? $36,234 Muitiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. $18,117 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value, $18,117 Section 8: Classification information *Only the MI Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tripunal* Parcel Identification Number: N/A Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: Real Personal (check one) O Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Culover Developmental Utility (check one) What do you believe Is the property’s classification? Real Personal (check one) O Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) If improved property, how Is the property currently being used? If improved property, for what use was the property designed?
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of thls petition? Od Yes vo Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? [| Yes If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. o The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If
Page 5
Col
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 DRF5 QOZB LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003692 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003692 Page 2 of 2 If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or email taxtrib@michigan.gov. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: November 4, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ORLENE HAWKS GOVERNOR LARSTNG DIRECTOR DRF5 QOZB LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MOAHR Docket No. 24-003692 City Of Detroit , Respondent(s) PROOF OF SERVICE Isaac Degraffenreid states that on 10/23/24 he/she [Name of person serving/mailing petition] [date of service] served a copy of the City of Detroit answer relative to the above-captioned matter upon: [Provide name and address of the party/people being served] DRF5 QOZB LLC 23875 Michigan ave suite 539 Dearborn Mi, 48124 oF hin YY [Signature of person who is serving/mailing copy] Tsaac D2 Hens <!( oF [Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy] MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
Coleman A. Young Municipal Center Phone: (313) 628-0722 Fronarty Assesment Board of Review 2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 105 Fax: (313) 224-4576 Detroit, Michigan 48226 www.detroitmi.gov 07/22/2024 DRF5 QOZB, LLC 23875 MICHIGAN AVE, STE 539 DEARBORN MI 48124 RE: 2024 MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW PETITION NUMBER: M-007068 The March Board of Review has considered the appeal on the 2024 assessment for the below described property and concluded that: FINDING OF FACTS: 1. Parcel Number: 22121917. 2. Property Address: 18988 RIVERVIEW 3. District: 1 4. Property Classification: 401 (RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) Ad Valorem 6. Principle Residence Exemption: 0% 5. Property Legal Description: E RIVERVIEW 162 BUNGALOHILL SUB L35 P61 PLATS, WC R 22/372 35 X 132 6. Petitioner timely filed an appeal to the March Board of Review. 7. The March Board of Review considered (if any) petitioner's and/or duly authorized representative evidence and/or testimony. The March Board of Review considered facts presented as on the assessment roll and/or any recommendations offered by the Office of the Assessor. CONCLUSION: The Board of Review has considered the appeal filed and found there was no adjustment warranted. Before Appeal After Appeal 2024 Assessed Value 31,600 31,600 2024 Taxable Value 26,670 26,670 If you are dissatisfied with the decision of the March Board of Review, submit this notice and complete the enclosed small claims form to appeal to: Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing MI 48909 A Michigan Tax Tribunal appeal must be made by May 31st of the current year for properties classified as: Commercial Real, Industrial Real, Commercial Personal, Industrial Personal and Utility Personal Property. A Michigan Tax Tribunal appeal must be made by July 31st of the current year for Residential Real Property Classification. A property Classification appeal may only be made for the current year. Such appeal may be filed with the State Tax Commission, PO Box 30471, Lansing, MI 48909-7971 by June 30th of the current year. Sincerely, City of Detroit Board of Review
Page 3
Parcel Number:
22121917,
Jurisdiction:
CITY OF DETROIT
County:
WAYNE
[Grantor
Grantee
Sale
Sale
Inst.
|Terms
of
Sale
Liber
Price
Date
| Type
&
Page
WAYNE
COUNTY
[DRF5
QOZB,
LLC
|
36,234)
10/06/2022
[QC
| 13-GOVERNMENT
USA HOLDINGS
LLC
ZOU INVESTMENTS
INC
|
13,000,
11/21/2017
[PTA
03-ARM'S
LENGTH
WAYNE COUNTY TREASURER
BAINES,
LAKEISHA
D
|
500]
11/29/2010
[PTA
13-GOVERNMENT
148862/1
C
P
INVESTMENTS
LLC
JOHNSON,
VELMA
|
70,000|
10/25/2006
|WD
03-ARM'S
LENGTH
|
Property Address
[Class: RESTDENTIAL-IMPRO
[Zoning:
R1
[Building Permit (s)
[
Date
18988 RIVERVIEW
|School:
DETROIT CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
PRE.
02
fig ~
Owner's Name/Address
=
T
[DRF5
QOZB,
LLC
rant:
22
8.
|
4
2024
Est TCV 63,267 TCV/TFA:
54.92
23875 MICHIGAN AVE,
STE 539
|
!
‘x
’
DEARBORN MI
48124
X [Emproved
|
[Vacant
Land Value Estimates
for Land Table 1R106.1R106-SE
|
Public
*
Factors
*
Improvements
Description
Frontage
Depth
Front
Depth
Rate
—
TDITT Road
35.00 132.00 1.0000 0.0000
0
[EexTDescription
[Gravel Road
SQ FT RATE BY SIZE
4,617.000 Sq Ft
0.13
|E RIVERVIEW 162 BUNGALOHILL SUB
L35
P61
X
|paved Road
* denotes lines that
do not contribute
to the to
|PLATS,
W
C
R 22/372
35
X
132
x
Storm Sewer
35
Actual
Front
Feet,
0.11
Total Acres
Total
|Comments / Influences
|x
|sidewalk
||
hatex
Land
I
o
nt Cost Estimates
HB
.
x
Is
mproveme:
s
pafatian ota PERTED;
VALUES
1x
ectric
Description
Rate
x
Gas
| D/W/P:
4in Concrete
7.56
Curb
Fencing:
Wire Mesh,
#11
3.53
|x
|street Lights
Total Estimated Land Improvements
|x
|standard Utilities
|
|
Underground Utils.
|
Topography
of
Site
{
[x
Level
[Rolling
X
Low
High
Landscaped
Swamp
Wooded
Pond
Waterfront
Ravine
Wetland
k
,
—
Flood Plain
Year
Land
Building
Assessed
Value|
Value
Value
Who
When
What
2024
300
31,300
31,600]
f—
TYL 01/15/2016 TYL-FINAL
[2023
300
25,100]
25,400
|The Equalizer.
Copyright
(c)
1889
- 20
TYL 05/18/2015 TYL-ADV RE
[3537
300
16,500]
16, 800
Licensed
To:
City of Detroit,
County
of
Wayne,
Michigan
2021
300
11,900
12,200
***
Information herein deemed reliable
but
not guaranteed***These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-003692 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City of Detroit (Wayne) First Name isaac M.I. Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government degraffenreid Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2 woodward City or Town detroit State Michigan ZIP Code 48226 Telephone Number 313-658-4711 Fax Number E-mail Address degraffenreidi@detroitmi.gov Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name M.I. Last Name Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address Section 3: Subject Property Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. No Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR The subject property is a 1.5 story single family home located in the Seven mile rouge group a ecf neighborhood. The petitioner purchased the property on 10/6/22. Per Proposal A, the taxable value of a property uncaps to the SEV the following year after a transfer of ownership, and the taxes have only increased yearly by the rate of inflation. the property is fairly and equitably assessed. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, cite the Board’s authority. Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? If yes, explain. Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? If so, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 22121917 Classification of Property: Real Residential Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 31,600 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 26,670 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 60,100 Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 31,600 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ isaac degraffenreid
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
24-003688 - $125 24-003690 - $125 24-003692 - $125 24-003694 - $125 24-003695 - $125 24-003696 - $125 24-003699 - $125 24-003702 - $125 24-003703 - $125 24-003704 - $125 24-003707 - $125 24-003708 - $125 order of default # Notice of Docket # 1 2 3 5 ~~ 24-003688 } 24-003688 6 24-003690 24-003690 7|no order received as of 10/10/24 24-003692 8 24-003694 24-003694 9 24-003695 ~ 24-003695 10 24-003696 ] | 24-003696 11| no order received as of 10/10/24 24-003699 12 24-003702 24-003702 13 24-003703 24-003703 14 24-003704 24-003704 15 24-003707 24-003707 16 24-003708 24-003708 RECEIVED 0CT 1.5 2024 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 24-003688 - 24-003690 - 24-003692 - 24-003694 - 24-003695 - 24-003696 - 24-003699 - 24-003702 - 24-003703 - 24-003704 - 24-003707 - 24-003708 - 0-1 10/14/24 500.00
Page 2
Ji bo 6620 6253 did | 13] 08 LAN XS [ IE Il | Ga/7ni [i mm as a Ea. a aie: TN
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 DRF5 QOZB LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003692 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: October 8, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 DRF5 QOZB LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003692 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: October 8, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
SS
RECEIVED
.
AL
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUN
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON |, BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL
Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or
Non-Property tax disputes.
Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal
(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not
submit this document, you may be held in default,
Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information
First Name
Mi
Last Name/Company Name
DRF5 QOZB, LLC
Mailing Address {No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural! Route)
23875 MICHIGAN AVENUE, SUITE 539
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
DEARBORN
Mi
48124
Telephone Number
Fax Number
423-838-4355
1-855-831-4166
E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mal)
DJ@NESSUSA.COM
Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
]
First Name
Ml.
Last Name
DHEERAJ
MATHEW
Firm Name (If any)
Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
4430 TILLY MILL ROAD, UNIT 307
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
DUNWOODY
GA
| 30360
Telephone Number
Fax Number
423-838-4355
1-855-831-4166
E-mall Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)
DJ@NESSUSA.COM
Section 3: Subject Property Information
How many
If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?
parcels are you | [7] yes*
No**
appealing?
*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.
**if no, you must fife separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted.Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check
a that apply)
True Cash and Taxable Value
{0 Poverty Exemption
[7 Taxable Value Only (calculation)
[1 Disabled Veterans Exemption
[3 uncapping of Taxable Value
[1 Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA)
[J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a
Classification
Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption)
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
PROPERTY WAS PURCHASED FOR ONLY $36,264 IN 2022.
SALES IN AREA OF SIMILAR PROPERTIES:
- 16216 PATTON ST; $33,000 ON 8/9/2023
- 18481 KENTFIELD; $34,000 ON 6/30/2023
Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
Year(s) you are appealing:
N/A
Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [Hl] Yes
[Hl] No
If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [I] March
[m] July
[i] December
if No, check the applicable reason(s):
[1 Not required to attend
Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner
[mn] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5)
0 Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order
0 Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of UncappingPage 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 7: Valuation Information use he multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 22121917. Classification of Property: Real Personal (check one) Agricultural Commercial Industrial re Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) [4 Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: $31,600 Current Taxable Value as estabfished by the BOR: $26,670 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? $36,234 Muitiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. $18,117 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value, $18,117 Section 8: Classification information *Only the MI Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tripunal* Parcel Identification Number: N/A Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: Real Personal (check one) O Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Culover Developmental Utility (check one) What do you believe Is the property’s classification? Real Personal (check one) O Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) If improved property, how Is the property currently being used? If improved property, for what use was the property designed?
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of thls petition? Od Yes vo Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? [| Yes If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. o The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If
Page 5
Col
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.