Michelle Jackson, Petitioner V City Of Detroit, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Michelle Jackson
- Respondent
- City Of Detroit
Case overview
- Docket number
- 25-003112-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Wayne
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Order of Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/26/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | Notice of Filing of Motion to Withdraw | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/05/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | Notice of Filing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/05/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Motion to Withdraw Appeal was received. | PET | Not recorded | 09/04/2025 | $0.00 | Download |
| 6 | Attachments to the Answer were filed | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/02/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/02/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/02/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 08/06/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/06/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 06/12/2025 | $125.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Michelle Jackson, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003112 City of Detroit, Respondent. ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw the Petition and Respondent has not filed an objection to the requested withdrawal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-003112 Page 2 of 6 the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. By:___________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: September 26, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Michelle Jackson, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003112 City of Detroit, Respondent. ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw the Petition and Respondent has not filed an objection to the requested withdrawal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 25-003112 Page 4 of 6 the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. By:___________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: September 26, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I.
Page 6
MT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Michelle Jackson, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003112 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL TAKE NOTICE that Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw (Motion) in the above- captioned appeal. Because the motion was not filed jointly (i.e. signed by both parties or representatives), Respondent has seven days from the service of the motion to file a response. Respondent may respond by agreeing to (i.e. concurrence) the withdrawal of the case or by objecting to the motion. If Respondent does not timely submit a concurrence or objection to the request, it will be deemed to be a concurrence and the request will be granted, unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. If the request is granted, the case will be dismissed. If a request is not granted or the Tribunal has not notified you that it has been granted, you are required to attend the hearing. For your convenience, you may use the Tribunal’s form “Response to Motion to Withdraw Appeal” located on the Tribunal’s website. To access the form, please go to our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib and go to either the “Entire Tribunal” or “Small Claims” page, depending on the division in which the case is pending. To submit the response, please fill out the form and file it with the Tribunal by e-mail or e-filing.1 By: Tribunal Clerk__________ Entered: September 5, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 1 Though you may file the response by hard copy (i.e. mail), filing by e-mail or e-filing will facilitate the efficient administration of justice.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Michelle Jackson, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003112 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL TAKE NOTICE that Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw (Motion) in the above- captioned appeal. Because the motion was not filed jointly (i.e. signed by both parties or representatives), Respondent has seven days from the service of the motion to file a response. Respondent may respond by agreeing to (i.e. concurrence) the withdrawal of the case or by objecting to the motion. If Respondent does not timely submit a concurrence or objection to the request, it will be deemed to be a concurrence and the request will be granted, unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. If the request is granted, the case will be dismissed. If a request is not granted or the Tribunal has not notified you that it has been granted, you are required to attend the hearing. For your convenience, you may use the Tribunal’s form “Response to Motion to Withdraw Appeal” located on the Tribunal’s website. To access the form, please go to our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib and go to either the “Entire Tribunal” or “Small Claims” page, depending on the division in which the case is pending. To submit the response, please fill out the form and file it with the Tribunal by e-mail or e-filing.2 By: Tribunal Clerk__________ Entered: September 5, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 2 Though you may file the response by hard copy (i.e. mail), filing by e-mail or e-filing will facilitate the efficient administration of justice.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Michelle Jackson, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003112 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal settlement conference process.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-003112 Page 2 of 8 MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or email taxtrib@michigan.gov. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: September 5, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Michelle Jackson, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003112 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an appeal of a principal residence
Page 4
MTT
Page 5
STATE
Page 6
MT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 _____________________________, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. _____________________________, Respondent(s) MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL 1. I wish to withdraw my appeal in the above-captioned docket. 2. Good cause exists to grant withdrawal because: 3. I ask this Tribunal to grant my request to withdraw the appeal and dismiss the above- captioned docket. Please select one of the following: __ I am filing this Motion to Withdraw before Respondent filed an Answer or a responsive motion with the Tribunal. __ I am filing this Motion to Withdraw after Respondent has filed an Answer or Responsive Motion with the Tribunal. I attached to this Motion Respondent’s written consent to withdraw my petition, or I shall grant Respondent the opportunity to object to this withdrawal. __________________________ ________________________________ Party/Representative (sign here) Print name of person signing I certify that on this date I served a copy of this Motion, and any additional documentation, on the opposing party or their representative. ___________________________ _____________________________________ Date (sign here) Michelle Jackson 25-003112 City of Detroit We came to an agreement with the City of Detroit. X Michelle Jackson Michelle Jackson 9/4/2025 Michelle Jackson
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ORLENE HAWKS GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Michelle Jackson R Petitioner(s) v MOAHR Docket No. 25-003112-TT City of Detroit , Respondent(s) PROOF OF SERVICE Danielle Washington states that on 09/02/2025 he/she [Name of person serving/mailing petition] [date of service] served a copy of the respondent answer relative to the above-captioned matter upon: [Provide name and address of the party/people being served] Michelle Jackson 5146 Woodland Trail Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 YX po i ignature of person who is serving/mailing copy] paste Wnngien [Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy] MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 611 W. OTTAWA ST « P.O. BOX 30232 « LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909-8195 « 51 7-335-9760
Page 2
GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ARO oR DPA LANSING PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. 25-003112-TT Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information First Name Danielle M.1. Last Name Washington Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2 Woodward Ave, Ste 804 City or Town Detroit State ZIP Code Ml 48226 ET 313.979.1657 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to sen d all correspondence via email) s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information Section 2: Respondent’ First Name M1 Last Name Firm Name (if any) Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence Vi; a email) Section 3: Subject Property Information O Yes No Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 5 0% or more? [J ves Od No Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. Not Applicable
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON SRO DPA GOVERNOR LANSING Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal An imported Deed (Doc #2025002049) from the Wayne County Treasury was entered into the BS&A system on May 5th, 2025. This resulted in the erroneous uncapping of the Petitioner's parcel. We have since updated the parcel to reflect the terms of a Land Contract payoff. To address the uncapping, we advise processing an adjustment to recap the 2025 tax year when permissible at the July Board of Review (JBOR) or the December Board of Review (DBOR). Once the recapping has been processed at either the JBOR or DBOR the taxable value for 2025 will be corrected 23,207. The adjustment pertaining to the recapping will be submitted to Wayne County Treasury for processing. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? J Yes No if yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: O March Od July O December If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? Yes O No *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [mm] Yes No If yes, cite the Board's authority. Was the assessmenlt(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? O Yes No If yes, explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? ves [Ano If so, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON LR” DPA GOVERNOR LANSING Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? O Yes rv) No f Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [1 March [J guy [J pecember List the date the BOR denied Petitioner's Poverty Exemption: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS Did Petitioner request the exemption ata BOR? [Hl] Yes O No If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: O March [] July Od December Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Real Personal (check one) ad Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) Section 6: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 22077060. Classification of Property: Real Personal (check one) Agricultural Commercial Industrial Resigentis Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Eaaaizod Value) as established by the BOR: 74,700 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 74,700 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 149400 Multiply the True Cash Value by 5 and enter here, This is your contention of Assessed Value. 74700 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 23207 Signature ‘Required # il is Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Free | Pa Vi 5 0 CiEe="_— Ist u
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PAPER FILING INSTRUCTIONS FOR ANSWER TO PROPERTY VALUATION/EXEMPTION/CLASSIFICATION
Page 6
STAT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-003112 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City of Detroit (Wayne) First Name Danielle M.I. Colleen Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government Washington Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2 Woodward Ave, Ste 804 City or Town Detroit State Michigan ZIP Code 48226 Telephone Number 313-979-1657 Fax Number E-mail Address danielle.washington@detroitmi.gov Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Danielle M.I. Last Name Washington Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2 Woodward Ave, Ste 804 City or Town Detroit State Michigan ZIP Code 48226 Telephone Number 313.979.1657 Fax Number E-mail Address Section 3: Subject Property Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? No Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. N/A Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR An imported Deed (Doc #2025002049) from the Wayne County Treasury was entered into the BS&A system on May 5th, 2025. This resulted in the erroneous uncapping of the Petitioner's parcel. We have since updated the parcel to reflect the terms of a Land Contract payoff. To address the uncapping, we advise processing an adjustment to recap the 2025 tax year when permissible at the July Board of Review (JBOR) or the December Board of Review (DBOR). Once the recapping has been processed at either the JBOR or DBOR the taxable value for 2025 will be corrected 23,207. The adjustment pertaining to the recapping will be submitted to Wayne County Treasury for processing. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? No If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? No If yes, cite the Board’s authority. Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, explain. Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? If so, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 22077060. Classification of Property: Real Residential Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 74,700 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 74,700 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 149400 Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 74700 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 23207 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Danielle Washington
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-003112 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City of Detroit (Wayne) First Name Danielle M.I. Colleen Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government Washington Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2 Woodward Ave, Ste 804 City or Town Detroit State Michigan ZIP Code 48226 Telephone Number 313-979-1657 Fax Number E-mail Address danielle.washington@detroitmi.gov Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Danielle M.I. Last Name Washington Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2 Woodward Ave, Ste 804 City or Town Detroit State Michigan ZIP Code 48226 Telephone Number 313.979.1657 Fax Number E-mail Address Section 3: Subject Property Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? No Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. N/A Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR An imported Deed (Doc #2025002049) from the Wayne County Treasury was entered into the BS&A system on May 5th, 2025. This resulted in the erroneous uncapping of the Petitioner's parcel. We have since updated the parcel to reflect the terms of a Land Contract payoff. To address the uncapping, we advise processing an adjustment to recap the 2025 tax year when permissible at the July Board of Review (JBOR) or the December Board of Review (DBOR). Once the recapping has been processed at either the JBOR or DBOR the taxable value for 2025 will be corrected 23,207. The adjustment pertaining to the recapping will be submitted to Wayne County Treasury for processing. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? No If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? No If yes, cite the Board’s authority. Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, explain. Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? If so, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 22077060. Classification of Property: Real Residential Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 74,700 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 74,700 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 149400 Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 74700 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 23207 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Danielle Washington
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED Se — oo JJUN 1.8 2025 Robert M. Weiss Attorney and Counselor at Law 280 N. Old Woodward Suite 402 Birmingham, Michigan 48009 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL. Phone: 248/258-5010 Fax: 248/258-9299 Robert M. Weiss June 10, 2025 Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 Re: Michelle Jackson 14153 Rosemont Detroit, MI Parcel No.: 22077060 Dear Sir/Madam: I am attaching my client, Michelle Jackson’s Appeal of the City of Detroit’s Board of Review decision dated May 17, 2025 (but was not received until June 5, 2025). It appears that the Board of Review’s decision was that the taxable value of the property was uncapped pursuant to Proposal A of 1994. However, the subject property was purchased via Land Contract on 12/2/16 and the Warranty Deed recorded on 1/3/25 was in furtherance of the satisfactory completion of the obligation pursuant to said Land Contract. There was no taxable event justifying uncapping the taxable value of said property. Please contact me after your review and let me know if a hearing is necessary. Iam enclosing my client’s filing fee of $125.00 with this application. If you have any questions or comments, please contact my office. Very truly yours,
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN .. GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA EE GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Nam MI Last Name/Company Name AHS LLE DOACKSe nN Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) S7%4L Mop ir TAA City or Town ZIP Cod, Coontz se, Mees || EE 302 Telephone Number ZT Fax Number EY SO- 40H py E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Petitioner's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Ml. Last Ngme Vz Ber 1 IY, 5S Firm Name (if gny) N Jose 17. Wess Arrooey 27 Lrey Address (No, Stree! ZED (eH 7 bry OL) fo oy) Aap ys City or Town State ZIP Code, | + Aes & tars F | Ydoo 9 Telephone Number Fax Number N | REE-JSE 850.0 Yd -2 sE- 5255 | E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) No4en T° Rm weirs ses, Cony Section 3: Subject Property Information How many If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? parcelsareyou | [7] ves* [] No** appealing? *If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANGTNG DIRECTOR Section 4: Issues Being Appealed heck a that apply) Kuo Cash and Taxable Value [O Poverty Exemption [J Taxable Value Only (calculation) [OJ Disabled Veterans Exemption i uncapping of Taxable Value 0 Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) [] Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a [O Classification Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal THAIS APPsAL )s BEING ADS To 24S Pore YE Tes TT Reo THE UNACAPPING oo FF Tos THN BLS HARE DUE TO J 55% PRolos ac A. Tits IR An ry tins Pol CS ED dn Lory lo preic 7 wv VIL For 4S ooo (S<s ATTRAC) THs WALLIT Dsl) AEsende IN 15/23/28 WAS in) SULTHSER CE EF THE AX S1=4= S12 pps, LR vn loni7 Koper, 77/4 Lops Wo T= Co rnss go Leer cape Oewne 45d, Sivee Rap, TRIS THe TANK bes UA LOE @ = PLBROY Sov MIT Have Beep) UpCAPIED, THE ATTRCHED LeTrel Flot Tae OIL WAS aby Lec VED ONT 6/5 25 A} Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Year(s) you are appealing: HIS . Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [Res [ml] No If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [] March [J July [] December If No, check the applicable reason(s): Biot required to attend Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) Appealing within 36 days of State Tax Commission Order
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 7: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 2Ad027060 Classification of Property: "R Perope! (check one) Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) 0 Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 7¢ 700 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 7%, Joo What do you believe is the fair jnarket value (also known as True Cash Value)? J ood) Muitiply the True Cash Value by .6 and os here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. Si AS oo If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. A327 Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* Parcel Identification Number: Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: Real Personal (check one) Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) What do you believe is the property's classification? Real Personal (check one) Agricultural Commercial
Page 5
STATE
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Michelle Jackson, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003112 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: August 6, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Michelle Jackson, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003112 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: August 6, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED Se — oo JJUN 1.8 2025 Robert M. Weiss Attorney and Counselor at Law 280 N. Old Woodward Suite 402 Birmingham, Michigan 48009 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL. Phone: 248/258-5010 Fax: 248/258-9299 Robert M. Weiss June 10, 2025 Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 Re: Michelle Jackson 14153 Rosemont Detroit, MI Parcel No.: 22077060 Dear Sir/Madam: I am attaching my client, Michelle Jackson’s Appeal of the City of Detroit’s Board of Review decision dated May 17, 2025 (but was not received until June 5, 2025). It appears that the Board of Review’s decision was that the taxable value of the property was uncapped pursuant to Proposal A of 1994. However, the subject property was purchased via Land Contract on 12/2/16 and the Warranty Deed recorded on 1/3/25 was in furtherance of the satisfactory completion of the obligation pursuant to said Land Contract. There was no taxable event justifying uncapping the taxable value of said property. Please contact me after your review and let me know if a hearing is necessary. Iam enclosing my client’s filing fee of $125.00 with this application. If you have any questions or comments, please contact my office. Very truly yours,
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN .. GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA EE GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Nam MI Last Name/Company Name AHS LLE DOACKSe nN Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) S7%4L Mop ir TAA City or Town ZIP Cod, Coontz se, Mees || EE 302 Telephone Number ZT Fax Number EY SO- 40H py E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Petitioner's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Ml. Last Ngme Vz Ber 1 IY, 5S Firm Name (if gny) N Jose 17. Wess Arrooey 27 Lrey Address (No, Stree! ZED (eH 7 bry OL) fo oy) Aap ys City or Town State ZIP Code, | + Aes & tars F | Ydoo 9 Telephone Number Fax Number N | REE-JSE 850.0 Yd -2 sE- 5255 | E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) No4en T° Rm weirs ses, Cony Section 3: Subject Property Information How many If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? parcelsareyou | [7] ves* [] No** appealing? *If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANGTNG DIRECTOR Section 4: Issues Being Appealed heck a that apply) Kuo Cash and Taxable Value [O Poverty Exemption [J Taxable Value Only (calculation) [OJ Disabled Veterans Exemption i uncapping of Taxable Value 0 Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) [] Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a [O Classification Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal THAIS APPsAL )s BEING ADS To 24S Pore YE Tes TT Reo THE UNACAPPING oo FF Tos THN BLS HARE DUE TO J 55% PRolos ac A. Tits IR An ry tins Pol CS ED dn Lory lo preic 7 wv VIL For 4S ooo (S<s ATTRAC) THs WALLIT Dsl) AEsende IN 15/23/28 WAS in) SULTHSER CE EF THE AX S1=4= S12 pps, LR vn loni7 Koper, 77/4 Lops Wo T= Co rnss go Leer cape Oewne 45d, Sivee Rap, TRIS THe TANK bes UA LOE @ = PLBROY Sov MIT Have Beep) UpCAPIED, THE ATTRCHED LeTrel Flot Tae OIL WAS aby Lec VED ONT 6/5 25 A} Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Year(s) you are appealing: HIS . Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [Res [ml] No If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [] March [J July [] December If No, check the applicable reason(s): Biot required to attend Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) Appealing within 36 days of State Tax Commission Order
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 7: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 2Ad027060 Classification of Property: "R Perope! (check one) Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) 0 Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 7¢ 700 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 7%, Joo What do you believe is the fair jnarket value (also known as True Cash Value)? J ood) Muitiply the True Cash Value by .6 and os here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. Si AS oo If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. A327 Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* Parcel Identification Number: Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: Real Personal (check one) Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) What do you believe is the property's classification? Real Personal (check one) Agricultural Commercial
Page 5
STATE
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.