Luke C Schock, Petitioner V City Of Detroit, Respondent

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Luke C Schock,

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

MTT Docket No.: 25-003350

City of Detroit, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING

The Tribunal has scheduled a telephone default hearing1 to be conducted as follows. 

Hearings are generally 30 minutes in length. 

HEARING DATE:

October 29, 2026

HEARING TIME:

3:15 PM Eastern Time

JOIN BY PHONE:

1-248-509-0316

ACCESS CODE:

122943514 

This hearing will be held by telephone conference call with the Judge as the host. In order to join 

the hearing, call the phone number listed above at least 5 minutes prior to the hearing time. You 

will then be required to input the access code, followed by # to connect. The Tribunal judge will call 

in and join by phone at the hearing time. Failure to timely call in may result in the placement of a 

party or parties in default.

1 “Default hearing" means a hearing at which the defaulted party is precluded from presenting any testimony, offering any 

evidence, and examining the other party's witnesses. TTR 203(e).

This is an important legal document. Please have someone translate the document.

Este es un documento legal importante. Por favor, haga traducir este documento.

এটি একটি গুরুত্বপূর্ণ আইনি দলিল, অনুগ্রহ করে কেউ দলিলটিকে অনুবাদ করুন।

.ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺛﻴﻘﺔ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻴﺔ ﻫﺎﻣﺔ ﻳﺮﺟﻰ ﻟﺪﻳﻚ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺗﺘﺮﺟﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﻴﻘﺔ

Ito ay isang mahalagang legal na dokumento. Mangyari lamang na magkaroon ng isang tao isalin ang 

dokumento.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-003350

Page 2 of 6

HEARING INFORMATION – PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY

GENERAL INFORMATION: An impartial default hearing will be conducted in accordance with the Michigan 

Tax Tribunal Rules (R 792.10201-R 792.10297) and the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act, MCL 24.201 

et seq. The Michigan Rules of Evidence and the Michigan Court Rules may be applicable. Parties are 

expected to exercise proper respect and courtesy toward other parties, witnesses, and administrative law 

judges, which includes attending the hearing on time, silencing cell phones, and choosing a quiet, private 

location to participate in the hearing to limit distractions and ensure minimal background noise. The hearing 

may be recorded for notetaking purposes, but the recording is not a formal record, unless otherwise provided 

for by the Tribunal.

REPRESENTATION: You may have an attorney or anyone else of your choice represent you at the hearing. 

The Tribunal does not recommend or appoint representatives for you and will not pay for your representative.

WITNESSES: You may have anyone join you at the hearing to speak in support of your case. However, the 

time to present your case is limited and additional time may not be provided to accommodate witness 

testimony.

DOCUMENTATION: Given its default status, Respondent is precluded from submitting any documents. 

Petitioner is required to submit all documents in support of their contentions to both the Tribunal and 

Respondent at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the 

local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted 

to both the Tribunal and Respondent, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be submitted to the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s electronic filing (e-filing) system. Documents may be sent to 

Respondent by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to submission by e-mail. If sent by mail, the documents 

must be sent to Respondent’s authorized representative at the address identified in the answer for the 

authorized representative, unless the authorized representative filed an appearance or other documentation 

identifying a different mailing address. The documents do not need to be resubmitted after the Notice of 

Hearing if they were previously submitted to the Tribunal and Respondent in this case.

If a hearing had previously been scheduled in this case and adjourned, and the adjournment order indicates 

that the parties are precluded from submitting any further documentary evidence, no further documentary 

evidence will be accepted even if filed and exchanged as indicated above.

INCLUSION OF SUBSEQUENT TAX YEARS: Subsequent tax year assessments are automatically included 

in valuation appeals once the assessment has been established for that tax year. For purposes of 

administrative efficiency, the Tribunal considers this date April 1st. As such, the parties should submit 

documentation and be prepared to discuss subsequent tax year assessments at hearings to be conducted on 

or after April 1st in a subsequent year. If the hearing is to be conducted prior to April 1st in a subsequent year, 

taxpayers are required to file a new petition and, if necessary, protest the subsequent tax year assessment at 

the March Board of Review for that year. 

MOTIONS/REQUESTS: A motion is a written request filed by a party asking the Tribunal to take certain action. 

The following motions and requests may be filed by either party regarding the scheduled hearing. Motions and 

requests may be submitted to the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Motions and 

requests may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to submission by e-mail. If 

sent by mail, motions and requests must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized representative at the 

address identified in the petition or answer for that party or authorized representative, unless the party or 

authorized representative filed an appearance or other documentation identifying a different mailing address. 

1. Motion to Adjourn: Parties may request the hearing be rescheduled (i.e. adjourned). The motion must be 

submitted to

Page 3

M

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Luke C Schock, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-003350 

 

City of Detroit, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER FOR DEFAULT HEARING 

 

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Respondent was placed 

in default on October 22, 2025, because Respondent failed to file an answer. The 

Tribunal extended the time for Respondent to cure the default by an additional 14 days 

on November 21, 2025, and it has failed to respond or submit the required filing(s). 

Given this failure, the Tribunal finds that Respondent’s violation was willful. It also 

establishes a history of deliberate delay and refusing to comply with Tribunal rules and 

orders, both of which have prejudiced Petitioner. As a result, giving careful 

consideration to the Grimm factors and considering all options in determining what 

sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal finds that scheduling a default hearing is 

warranted, and a lesser sanction would not be appropriate or better serve the interests 

of justice.1 

 

Additionally, the Tribunal finds that Petitioner’s appeal includes an appeal of the 

classification of the subject property. The Tribunal has no jurisdiction over Petitioner’s 

classification claim because Petitioner was required to “notify the assessor and [] 

protest the assigned classification to the March board of review.” Additionally, “[a]n 

owner . . . may appeal the decision of the March board of review by filing a petition with 

the state tax commission not later than June 30 in that tax year.” As such, the Tribunal 

is not the proper venue for a classification claim brought forward by a property owner. 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that a default hearing shall be scheduled in the normal course.2 

 

1 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). Though Grimm was specific to the sanction 

of dismissal, the cases cited by the Court, and the reasoning behind its adoption of the factors set forth 

therein are not so narrow. The factors apply equally to default judgements, or in the case of the Tribunal 

proceedings, the conducting of a default hearing. See Bass v Combs, 238 Mich App 16 (1999), overruled 

in part on other grounds by Dimmitt & Owens Fin, Inc v Deloitte & Touche (ISC), LLC, 481 Mich 618 

(2008), Vicencio v Ramirez, 211 Mich App 501 (1995), and Traxler v Ford Motor Co, 227 Mich App 276 

(1998). See also TTR 237. 

2 A “default hearing" is “a hearing at which the defaulted party is precluded from presenting any testimony, 

offering any evidence, and examining the other party's witnesses.” TTR 203(e).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-003350 

Page 2 of 2 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s classification appeal only is DISMISSED. 

 

 

 

Entered: December 16, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

kac 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Luke C Schock, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-003350 

 

City of Detroit, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER FOR DEFAULT HEARING 

 

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Respondent was placed 

in default on October 22, 2025, because Respondent failed to file an answer. The 

Tribunal extended the time for Respondent to cure the default by an additional 14 days 

on November 21, 2025, and it has failed to respond or submit the required filing(s). 

Given this failure, the Tribunal finds that Respondent’s violation was willful. It also 

establishes a history of deliberate delay and refusing to comply with Tribunal rules and 

orders, both of which have prejudiced Petitioner. As a result, giving careful 

consideration to the Grimm factors and considering all options in determining what 

sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal finds that scheduling a default hearing is 

warranted, and a lesser sanction would not be appropriate or better serve the interests 

of justice.1 

 

Additionally, the Tribunal finds that Petitioner’s appeal includes an appeal of the 

classification of the subject property. The Tribunal has no jurisdiction over Petitioner’s 

classification claim because Petitioner was required to “notify the assessor and [] 

protest the assigned classification to the March board of review.” Additionally, “[a]n 

owner . . . may appeal the decision of the March board of review by filing a petition with 

the state tax commission not later than June 30 in that tax year.” As such, the Tribunal 

is not the proper venue for a classification claim brought forward by a property owner. 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that a default hearing shall be scheduled in the normal course.2 

 

1 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). Though Grimm was specific to the sanction 

of dismissal, the cases cited by the Court, and the reasoning behind its adoption of the factors set forth 

therein are not so narrow. The factors apply equally to default judgements, or in the case of the Tribunal 

proceedings, the conducting of a default hearing. See Bass v Combs, 238 Mich App 16 (1999), overruled 

in part on other grounds by Dimmitt & Owens Fin, Inc v Deloitte & Touche (ISC), LLC, 481 Mich 618 

(2008), Vicencio v Ramirez, 211 Mich App 501 (1995), and Traxler v Ford Motor Co, 227 Mich App 276 

(1998). See also TTR 237. 

2 A “default hearing" is “a hearing at which the defaulted party is precluded from presenting any testimony, 

offering any evidence, and examining the other party's witnesses.” TTR 203(e).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-003350 

Page 2 of 2 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s classification appeal only is DISMISSED. 

 

 

 

Entered: December 16, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

kac 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Luke C Schock, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-003350 

 

City of Detroit, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR RESPONDENT TO CURE DEFAULT 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that it entered an order 

holding Respondent in default on October 22, 2025, because they failed to file an 

answer.1 Respondent was required to cure the default within 14 days, has had ample 

time to comply, yet has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the 

Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Respondent’s failure 

to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established 

a history of deliberate delay that would justify the scheduling of a default hearing for 

failure to timely comply with this order.2 Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the time for Respondent to cure the default is EXTENDED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent must complete the following to cure the 

default: (1) file an Answer for Valuation Appeal, (2) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, 

and (3) file proof the motion was served on Petitioner. The foregoing must be filed with 

the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order.3 

 

Failure to comply with this order may result in the scheduling of a default hearing, as 

provided by TTR 237.4 

 

Entered: November 21, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

kac 

 

 

1 The order further stated, “Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being 

required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 

2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5). 

4 See also MCL 205.732.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-003350 

Page 2 of 2 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Luke C Schock,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-003350

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Respondent has failed to file an answer. See TTR 281. Respondent must file an 

answer within 14 days of the entry of this order. Small Claims answer forms can be 

found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.i 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: October 22, 2025

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-003350

Page 2 of 7

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)

Page 3

Luke C Schock

7750 Third St

Apt 103

Detroit , MI 48202

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Luke C Schock,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-003350

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Respondent has failed to file an answer. See TTR 281. Respondent must file an 

answer within 14 days of the entry of this order. Small Claims answer forms can be 

found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.ii 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: October 22, 2025

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

ii “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on

Page 5

MTT Docket No. 25-003350

Page 5 of 7

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)

Page 6

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Luke C Schock,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-003350

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Respondent has failed to file an answer. See TTR 281. Respondent must file an 

answer within 14 days of the entry of this order. Small Claims answer forms can be 

found on our

Page 7

MT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUL 102025 

Traninfo:06 

 26033305-1 

07/09/25 

Any, 

SE 

Chih: 

905 

Aut: $125.00 

i 

ID: 

STEPHEN SCHOCK 

LHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

a) Sao 

BROWN, 

DPA 

MARLON, 

, DP. 

gs 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF Erika i rains REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

perkins 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Bo not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant 

to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submita copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(0.9. Board of Revisw Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information 

Firet Name 

Wi. 

LastName/Conpany 

Name 

Luke 

Cc 

Schocl 

Malllng Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Routs) 

7750 Third Street, Apt 

103 

CltyorTown 

_ 

Sle 

| ZIP Code 

Detroit 

Mi 

48202 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

313-702-3444 

| E-mail Address (do notentar unless you want MTT to send al correspondence via e-mall) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

FirstName 

[CIN 

Last Name 

Firm Name 

(if any) 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Routs) 

Clty or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

|| E-mail Address (donot entar unless you want MTT to send 

all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information

Page 2

El 

Ca 

) 

| STATE OF MICHIGAN 

N 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check sit thst sppiy) 

Pp: True Cash and Taxable Value 

“| 

[J Poverty Exemption 

O Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

. 

[3 visabled Veterans Exemption 

[7] Uncapping of Taxable Value 

“1a Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

[J Exemption from Taxation {other than the denial of a 

[OJ Classification 

Principal Rasidence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

8 

hen 

iy 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

We are hoping you can help to lower the current assessment of our 571 square foot, 100-year-old condominium located 

at 7750 Third Sfreet in Detroit. The current assessment is 73,900. This assessment makes the true cash value / fair 

market value of our property $147,800. Traditionally the market value of condos is substantially lower than single family 

homes. 

Based on the research of comparable condos that have recently sold, in this neighborhood and similar neighborhoods, 

the tue cash value / fair market value of our property should be under $100,000 and the assessed value should be 

around 50,000 (50% of the True Cash Value). 

The attached list of 30 condominium comparisons shows properties that have recently sold in our neighborhood and sim- 

ilar Detroit neighborhoods. The average selling price / fair market value of these listed condos is $60,545. These compari- 

sons have been provided by licensed realtor Lynn Williams from the Real Estate One Board of Realtors. Lynn Williams 

can be contacted af the following email if you have questions regarding the real estate comparisons. 

ynneshinewilliams@gmail.com. 

Our building needs updates, and we are struggling fo pay the taxes on our home at the cunent assessed rate. Please 

consider lowering the assessment of our property to more accurately reflect the current true cash value / fair market 

value. We appreciate your help and thank you for your consideration. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional issues 

Year(s} youare appealing: 

2025 

Did you profost the assessment 

atu Board of Review (BOR)? 

~ [m] Yeu 

J] No 

If Yas, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [] March 

[J dy 

[J] December 

1 No, check the applicable reason(s):

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

,, 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

[gr 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information *use the multipié parce! form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

040018LF. O31 

Classification of Property: 

ea} 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

reg 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utllity 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

75, 900 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

73,900 

What do you believe is the fair 58 ae known as True Cash Value)? 

Multiply The True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Asgessed Value. 

, 000 

If you believe the Taxable Value er from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

0,000 

Section 8: Classification Information onty the Mi Dept of Treasury may appeal this Issue to the Tribunal* 

Parcel oc iva 

0400 RLF. 0D] 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

al 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commerclal 

Industrial i. 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utlity 

(check one} 

What do you belleve is the property's classification? 

al 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricuttural 

Commercial 

Industrial Ba 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

[fimproved property, how 

is the property currently being used? 

RESON A] HosSILG) 

fimproved property, for what use was the property designed? 

[Eset] Hos,

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

LANSING 

Fee Information 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? 

1] Yes Tao 

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 

O Yes 

Horo 

If you answered yes fo elther or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees, 

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value

Page 5

$

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Luke C Schock,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-003350

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: September 9, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

Luke C Schock

7750 Third St

Apt 103

Detroit , MI 48202

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Luke C Schock,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-003350

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: September 9, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Luke C Schock,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-003350

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: September 9, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUL 102025 

Traninfo:06 

 26033305-1 

07/09/25 

Any, 

SE 

Chih: 

905 

Aut: $125.00 

i 

ID: 

STEPHEN SCHOCK 

LHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

a) Sao 

BROWN, 

DPA 

MARLON, 

, DP. 

gs 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF Erika i rains REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

perkins 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Bo not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant 

to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submita copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(0.9. Board of Revisw Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information 

Firet Name 

Wi. 

LastName/Conpany 

Name 

Luke 

Cc 

Schocl 

Malllng Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Routs) 

7750 Third Street, Apt 

103 

CltyorTown 

_ 

Sle 

| ZIP Code 

Detroit 

Mi 

48202 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

313-702-3444 

| E-mail Address (do notentar unless you want MTT to send al correspondence via e-mall) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

FirstName 

[CIN 

Last Name 

Firm Name 

(if any) 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Routs) 

Clty or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

|| E-mail Address (donot entar unless you want MTT to send 

all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information

Page 2

El 

Ca 

) 

| STATE OF MICHIGAN 

N 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check sit thst sppiy) 

Pp: True Cash and Taxable Value 

“| 

[J Poverty Exemption 

O Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

. 

[3 visabled Veterans Exemption 

[7] Uncapping of Taxable Value 

“1a Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

[J Exemption from Taxation {other than the denial of a 

[OJ Classification 

Principal Rasidence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

8 

hen 

iy 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

We are hoping you can help to lower the current assessment of our 571 square foot, 100-year-old condominium located 

at 7750 Third Sfreet in Detroit. The current assessment is 73,900. This assessment makes the true cash value / fair 

market value of our property $147,800. Traditionally the market value of condos is substantially lower than single family 

homes. 

Based on the research of comparable condos that have recently sold, in this neighborhood and similar neighborhoods, 

the tue cash value / fair market value of our property should be under $100,000 and the assessed value should be 

around 50,000 (50% of the True Cash Value). 

The attached list of 30 condominium comparisons shows properties that have recently sold in our neighborhood and sim- 

ilar Detroit neighborhoods. The average selling price / fair market value of these listed condos is $60,545. These compari- 

sons have been provided by licensed realtor Lynn Williams from the Real Estate One Board of Realtors. Lynn Williams 

can be contacted af the following email if you have questions regarding the real estate comparisons. 

ynneshinewilliams@gmail.com. 

Our building needs updates, and we are struggling fo pay the taxes on our home at the cunent assessed rate. Please 

consider lowering the assessment of our property to more accurately reflect the current true cash value / fair market 

value. We appreciate your help and thank you for your consideration. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional issues 

Year(s} youare appealing: 

2025 

Did you profost the assessment 

atu Board of Review (BOR)? 

~ [m] Yeu 

J] No 

If Yas, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [] March 

[J dy 

[J] December 

1 No, check the applicable reason(s):

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

,, 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

[gr 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information *use the multipié parce! form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

040018LF. O31 

Classification of Property: 

ea} 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

reg 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utllity 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

75, 900 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

73,900 

What do you believe is the fair 58 ae known as True Cash Value)? 

Multiply The True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Asgessed Value. 

, 000 

If you believe the Taxable Value er from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

0,000 

Section 8: Classification Information onty the Mi Dept of Treasury may appeal this Issue to the Tribunal* 

Parcel oc iva 

0400 RLF. 0D] 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

al 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commerclal 

Industrial i. 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utlity 

(check one} 

What do you belleve is the property's classification? 

al 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricuttural 

Commercial 

Industrial Ba 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

[fimproved property, how 

is the property currently being used? 

RESON A] HosSILG) 

fimproved property, for what use was the property designed? 

[Eset] Hos,

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

LANSING 

Fee Information 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? 

1] Yes Tao 

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 

O Yes 

Horo 

If you answered yes fo elther or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees, 

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value

Page 5

$

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.