Loretta J Klebba Petitioner V Township Of Big Creek Respondent
- Petitioner
- Loretta J Klebba
- Respondent
- Township Of Big Creek
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-000989-TT
- Status
- Extended Default Respondent
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Oscoda
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Evidence was received. | PET | Not recorded | 10/08/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | Order Extending R's Default | Not recorded | 4 | 09/10/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | Order Placing Motion in Abeyance | Not recorded | 5 | 09/10/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Notice of Filing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/10/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 07/08/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Motion to Set Aside Default was received. | RESP | Not recorded | 07/08/2026 | $50.00 | Download |
| 4 | Order of Default of Respondent | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/25/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 05/14/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/14/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 03/31/2026 | $125.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED Loretta J. Klebba, 47049 Lauren Court, Van Buren, Ml 48111 (734) 968-7586 OCT 15 2026 ljholstenmailbox@gmail.com MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL. Michigan Tax Tribunal P.0.,Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 October 8, 2026 To Whom It May Concern: RE: MTT Docket No. 26-000989 Please consider my position for the 136 Ray Road proposed 2026 taxable value as follows: » The property was was listed and purchased at the current market value of $90,000 in August 2025. ® According to the realtor's market analysis, the estimated Market Value was $85,000 to $95,000. (attached) e The property changed ownership in December 2024 before | purchased it in August 2025. For the previous owner, the taxable value for the 136 Ray Road property was $45,715 for 2025. This amount was an increase of $12,804 in the taxable value from the previous 2024 taxable amount of $32,911. e The 2026 tenative taxable amount for the 136 Ray Road property is $59,300. The increase from the 2025 taxable value to the proposed 2026 taxable value is an increase of $13,585 for the taxable value. ® The National increase in single family home prices has not risen high enough to support an increase of $13,585 for 2026. (see attached chart) In conclusion, | believe that the taxable value for the 136 Ray Road property should be no more than $45,000 for 2026 since the current market value of the property was $90,000. Thank you for your consideration. beta Holehtms oretta J. Klebba cc: James Randy Booth, Supervisor, Big Creek Township Attachments: (6) Realtor's Market Analysis
Page 2
Market Analysis prepared for Gerard A. Klebba and Loretta J. Klebba 47049 Lauren Court Van Buren, Mi 48111 For a property located at 136 W Ray Road Mio, Mi 48647 Prepared By Joseph Sykes State Wide Real Estate 989-826-3292 Cell 989-808-8592
Page 3
Property ID # 001-325-018-60 Legal Description T26N R2E SEC 25 - £14/2 OF $ 1/2 OF § 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF SE 1/4. EXCW 225". 3.30 A. 3 bedrooms, 2 bath Address 136 Ray Road Mio, Mi 48647 Large Windows Barn, two Sheds Deck Wood Heater, and LP Gas pond Family Room Woodstave 1876 sq ft State Equalized Value (SEV) Current State Equalized Value = $57,500 x2 Total Value= $115,000 Sold Comparables Address List Price | Sold Square Price per Acreage Date Sold Price Feet Sq ft 100 N Galbraith Rd 99,900 91,000 1040 87.5 9 09/04/2024 2395 Park Road 64,900 42,400 1216 34.84 4 10/ 16/2024 450 S Reain Rd 110,000 100,000 1224 81.69 2 03/28/2025 Average 91,600 77,800 1160 68.01 5
Page 4
Oscoda County, Mi
Summary
Parcel Number
~~ 001-325-018:60
Property Address
136 W RAY ROAD
Legal Description
T26N R2E SEC 25- E 1/2 OF § 1/2 OF § 1/2QF SW 1/4 OF SE 1/4, EXC W 225, 3.30 A. M/L.
{Note: The Description ab:
if bg ba sed o
Tax District
001 BIG CREEK TOWNSHIP
Schoot District
68010 MIOAU SABLE SCHOOLS
Property Class
401 RESIDENTIAL IMPROVED
Net Acres
33
Total Acres
33
Homestead %
100
Homestead Date
5/10/1994 12:00:00 AM
Vigyz tdap
Owner
KLEBBA GERARD AG LORETTA J
47049 LAUREN COURY
VAN BUREN,
MI 48111
Date of Last Name Change 8/22/2025
Land
LotArea
3.30Acres
Residential
Floor Area
1,876 sqft
Garage Area
864 5qit
Faundation Size
1,876sqft
Year Built
[1]
Occupancy
Mobile Home
Effective Age
24yrs
Percent Complete
100%
ACw/Separate Ducts
No
Basement Rooms
1st Floor Rooms
2nd Floor Rooms
Bedrooms
Full Bathrooms
Haff Bathrooms
onooo
Valuation
+
Assessed! Building Value
+
Assessed Land Value
=
Assessed Value
Year
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
Estimated TCV
Basement Area
Year Remodeled
Class
TricLevel
Heat
Wood Stove Add-on
Water
Sewer
Style
8C
Ne
Forced Airw/ Ducts
0
Water Well
Septic
MOBILE
Assessed Value Breakdowns
2025
$31,100
526400
“s57.500
_ Assessed Value
$57.500
$47,700
$38,200
$35,100
$30,900
2024
2023
$0
50
$47,700
$8200
$47,700
$38,200
Total Valuations
State Equalized Value
’
$57,500
$47,700
$38,200
$35,100
"$30,900
2021
Cs
$30,900
$30,900
Taxable Value
$45,745
$32,911
$31,344
$29,852
$28.899Page 5
Year
{click for detail)
.
Season
Total Amount
Total Paid
last
Total Due
W202
Summer
©
343567
$435.67
9/1412
£0.00
@oay
ter
}
$26229
som
N
$282.29
moan
)
or
Summer
N
$42656
$426.56
9/14/2021
$0.00
wu
ne
Winter
$278.73
$278.73
3/12021
$000
Won
BB
summer
$42085
42085
ona020
goo
© 20
)
Winter
$186.69
$186.69
24/2020
$000
a0
oo
CT
summer
$475.81
$4781
912/219
$000
@ os
ee
Winter
$219.56
21956
2/28/2019
$000
EE
’
"Summer
©
gs3952
$539.52
“o/1412018
$0.00
Sales
|
SaleDate
SolePrice
Instrument
_ Grantor
i}
i
Grantee
I
8/21/2025
WD
PALAZZOLO DEBORAHK
KLEBBA GERARD A & LORETTA J
12/14/2024
Tc
CT
BELLOW,
JR THEODORE B
PALAZZOLO DEBORAH K
No data available for the fofiowing modules: Commercial, Agricultural, Extra Features.
#8 SCHNEIDER
2
anoeraTiatPage 6
|Address: TUU N Galbraith Road , Mio, MI; 48647 ( ‘ ] ] ] ) MLS#: 201830812 Provided as a courtesy of : ce : List Price: $99,500 Joseph James Sykes Type: Residential Acreage State Wide Real Estate Mio Status: Closed 10g on rel Prop Type: Residential Mio, MI 48647 Bedrooms: 3 Office - (988) 826-3282 Bathrooms: 2 info@statewidemio.com Gar YIN: Yes Gar Type: Pole Barn Gar Stall: 4 Gar Size: 30x48 pole building Style: Ranch Waterfront: No County: Oscoda Lake/River Other: Construction: HUD Sectional Frontage: None Tax ID 004-035-017-00 #Acres: 9.00 Lot Dim: gl Above SqFt: 1040 Total SqFt: 1040 SqFt Source: County Records School District: Mio/Ausable Ownership Status Owner TownshipiCity/Village: Elmer Subdivision or TR: T27N R2E Realtor.com Type: Residential-Single Family Full Baths 2 Half Baths Q internet Access Cable Public Remarks: 8+/- Acre property with a 3-bedroom, 2-bathroom home and a large pole building. Mostly open lard surrounded by tall pines. Includes a
Page 7
|
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Loretta J Klebba, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-000989 Big Creek Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER PLACING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT IN ABEYANCE ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR RESPONDENT TO CURE DEFAULT On July 8, 2026, Respondent filed an answer and a motion requesting the Tribunal set aside the default entered in this case on June 25, 2026. Petitioner did not file a response to the motion. The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file and finds that Respondent was held in default because they failed to file an answer.1 Although Respondent timely responded to the Order of Default, their attempt to cure is incomplete because Respondent failed to sign the answer. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Respondent’s failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify the scheduling of a default hearing for failure to timely comply with this order.2 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED Respondent’s Motion to Set Aside Default is placed in ABEYANCE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time for Respondent to cure the default is EXTENDED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent must complete the following to cure the default: (1) file a signed amended answer. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order.3 1 The order further stated, “Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-000989 Page 2 of 2 Failure to comply with this order may result in the scheduling of a default hearing, as provided by TTR 237.4 Entered: September 10, 2026 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm kac PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5). 4 See also MCL 205.732.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Loretta J Klebba, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-000989 Big Creek Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER PLACING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT IN ABEYANCE ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR RESPONDENT TO CURE DEFAULT On July 8, 2026, Respondent filed an answer and a motion requesting the Tribunal set aside the default entered in this case on June 25, 2026. Petitioner did not file a response to the motion. The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file and finds that Respondent was held in default because they failed to file an answer.1 Although Respondent timely responded to the Order of Default, their attempt to cure is incomplete because Respondent failed to sign the answer. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Respondent’s failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify the scheduling of a default hearing for failure to timely comply with this order.2 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED Respondent’s Motion to Set Aside Default is placed in ABEYANCE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time for Respondent to cure the default is EXTENDED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent must complete the following to cure the default: (1) file a signed amended answer. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order.3 1 The order further stated, “Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-000989 Page 2 of 2 Failure to comply with this order may result in the scheduling of a default hearing, as provided by TTR 237.4 Entered: September 10, 2026 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm kac PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5). 4 See also MCL 205.732.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Loretta J Klebba, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-000989 Township Of Big Creek, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal settlement conference process.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-000989 Page 2 of 2 MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or email taxtrib@michigan.gov. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: September 10, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Loretta J Klebba, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-000989 Township Of Big Creek, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an appeal of a principal
Page 4
MTT
Page 5
STAT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Loretta J Klebba ; MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. 26 000989 oo TranInfosarle ZeIT5605-1 07/13/26 Big Creek Township Chidl: 55360100573 Amt: $50.00 ? 10: JAMES BOOTH Respondent(s) PROOF OF SERVICE James R Booth states that on 07/08/2026 he/she [Name of person serving/mailing petition] [date of service] served a copy of the Mamesssomnerammameanseen relative to the above-captioned matter upon: [Provide name and address of the party/people being served] Loretta J klebba 47049 Lauren ct Van Buren Twp Mi. 48111 [&gnature of person who is serving/mailing copy] James Randy Booth
Page 2
AR bt STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Loretta J Klebba ” MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. 26 000989 Township of Big Creek , Respondent(s) MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT 1. A default was entered against me on 06/25/2026 and, if applicable, the default was extended on 2. Good cause exists to set aside the default because: | do not have a record of receiving a copy of this petition or the notice of Docket Number. | reviewed all of my emails and did not receive a copy via email either. 3. | ask this Tribunal to set aside the default. Tm emeenate (sign here) James Randy booth [Print/type name of person signing] | certify that on this date | served a copy of this Motion, and any additional documentation, on the opposing party or their representative.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING MTT DOCKET NO. 26 000989 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Unit of Government Big Creek Township Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 1175 West Ryno Rd. City or Town: State: ZIP Code: Luzerne : = Telephone Number: 0g 0) 826 5992 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): jrbooth2127 @gmail.com Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information | First Name: M.1.: Last Name: James R Booth Firm Name (if any): Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 1175 W Ryno rd. City or Town: State: ZIP Code: Luzerne Mi 48636 Telephone nme gag 390 071 6 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): Jrbooth2127@gmail.com Section 3: Subject Property Information Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. Lil Yes O No Not Applicable Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more for all tax years at issue? = Yes [4] No
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Based upon the attached sales study and ECF study prepared for Big Creek Township we believe the assessed and taxable values are correct. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes [mm] No If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March O July O December If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? O Yes O No If yes, cite the Board's authority. Was the assessment at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [Hl] Yes No If yes, explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? [| Yes No If so, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? Section 6: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Number: 001 325 01 8 60 Classification of Property: ~~ Real Personal [J (check one) Agricultural J ~~ Commercial 0 Industrial J Residential Timber-Cutover J ~~ Developmental J Utility J (check one)
Page 5
006-530-005-00 800 MCKINLEY ROAD Big Creek Township 2026 Residential Vacant Land Sales Study 09/06/23 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $6,500 $34,000 5.01 $6,786 002-001-018-00 $36,000 02/06/24 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $12,000 004-115-013-30 1341 HILL ROAD 05/17/23 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $14,000 2.42 $5,785 001-301-134-50 125 S GERBER RD 03/07/25 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $19,000 2.50 $7,600 $45,000 7.61 $5,913 002-034-016-08 08/02/23 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $19,900 001-301-236-00 001-301-124-15 477 W CHERRY CR RD 006-307-023-20 001-317-004-30 2360 RYNO 07/27/25 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $8,000 07/30/24 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $22,000 10/31/24 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $26,000 $75,900 10/12/23 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $24,500 5.00 003 001-317-004-25 2380 RYNO 12/20/23 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $25,900 5.00 $77,400 15.28
Page 6
Big Creek Township 2026
Residential Vacant Land Sales Study
002-035-021-00 2995 N WEAVER ROAD
11/30/23 WD
03-ARM'S LENGTH
$21,750
7.88
$2,760
$106,500
36.99
$2,879
006-318-084-00
CAUCHYROAD
=
12/31/23 IC
LENGT
$40,000
003-011-011-10 2170 N ABBE
07/05/23
WD
LENGTH
$37,500
001-313-085-00
05/31/23 WD ~~ 03-ARM'S LENGTH
$38,000
10.00
$3,800
004-128-012-05 3547 CENTERLINE
05/15/24 WD ~~ 03-ARM'S LENGTH
$20,000
10.10
$1,980
003-518-005-05
03/05/24 WD ~~ 03-ARM'S LENGTH
$20,000
10.02
$1,996
0
NEELANI
$2,000
03-ARM'S LENGTH
$2,495
0
$2,500
0
2-02
2
/
{
0.00
$2,800
002-035-012-13 2404 SUNNY RIDGE LAN
~~ 07/10/24 WD ~~ 03-ARM'S LENGTH
$32,000
9.50Page 7
Big
Page 8
Ge
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Loretta J Klebba ; MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. 26 000989 oo TranInfosarle ZeIT5605-1 07/13/26 Big Creek Township Chidl: 55360100573 Amt: $50.00 ? 10: JAMES BOOTH Respondent(s) PROOF OF SERVICE James R Booth states that on 07/08/2026 he/she [Name of person serving/mailing petition] [date of service] served a copy of the Mamesssomnerammameanseen relative to the above-captioned matter upon: [Provide name and address of the party/people being served] Loretta J klebba 47049 Lauren ct Van Buren Twp Mi. 48111 [&gnature of person who is serving/mailing copy] James Randy Booth
Page 2
AR bt STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Loretta J Klebba ” MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. 26 000989 Township of Big Creek , Respondent(s) MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT 1. A default was entered against me on 06/25/2026 and, if applicable, the default was extended on 2. Good cause exists to set aside the default because: | do not have a record of receiving a copy of this petition or the notice of Docket Number. | reviewed all of my emails and did not receive a copy via email either. 3. | ask this Tribunal to set aside the default. Tm emeenate (sign here) James Randy booth [Print/type name of person signing] | certify that on this date | served a copy of this Motion, and any additional documentation, on the opposing party or their representative.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING MTT DOCKET NO. 26 000989 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Unit of Government Big Creek Township Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 1175 West Ryno Rd. City or Town: State: ZIP Code: Luzerne : = Telephone Number: 0g 0) 826 5992 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): jrbooth2127 @gmail.com Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information | First Name: M.1.: Last Name: James R Booth Firm Name (if any): Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 1175 W Ryno rd. City or Town: State: ZIP Code: Luzerne Mi 48636 Telephone nme gag 390 071 6 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): Jrbooth2127@gmail.com Section 3: Subject Property Information Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. Lil Yes O No Not Applicable Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more for all tax years at issue? = Yes [4] No
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Based upon the attached sales study and ECF study prepared for Big Creek Township we believe the assessed and taxable values are correct. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes [mm] No If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March O July O December If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? O Yes O No If yes, cite the Board's authority. Was the assessment at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [Hl] Yes No If yes, explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? [| Yes No If so, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? Section 6: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Number: 001 325 01 8 60 Classification of Property: ~~ Real Personal [J (check one) Agricultural J ~~ Commercial 0 Industrial J Residential Timber-Cutover J ~~ Developmental J Utility J (check one)
Page 5
006-530-005-00 800 MCKINLEY ROAD Big Creek Township 2026 Residential Vacant Land Sales Study 09/06/23 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $6,500 $34,000 5.01 $6,786 002-001-018-00 $36,000 02/06/24 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $12,000 004-115-013-30 1341 HILL ROAD 05/17/23 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $14,000 2.42 $5,785 001-301-134-50 125 S GERBER RD 03/07/25 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $19,000 2.50 $7,600 $45,000 7.61 $5,913 002-034-016-08 08/02/23 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $19,900 001-301-236-00 001-301-124-15 477 W CHERRY CR RD 006-307-023-20 001-317-004-30 2360 RYNO 07/27/25 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $8,000 07/30/24 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $22,000 10/31/24 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $26,000 $75,900 10/12/23 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $24,500 5.00 003 001-317-004-25 2380 RYNO 12/20/23 WD 03-ARM'S LENGTH $25,900 5.00 $77,400 15.28
Page 6
Big Creek Township 2026
Residential Vacant Land Sales Study
002-035-021-00 2995 N WEAVER ROAD
11/30/23 WD
03-ARM'S LENGTH
$21,750
7.88
$2,760
$106,500
36.99
$2,879
006-318-084-00
CAUCHYROAD
=
12/31/23 IC
LENGT
$40,000
003-011-011-10 2170 N ABBE
07/05/23
WD
LENGTH
$37,500
001-313-085-00
05/31/23 WD ~~ 03-ARM'S LENGTH
$38,000
10.00
$3,800
004-128-012-05 3547 CENTERLINE
05/15/24 WD ~~ 03-ARM'S LENGTH
$20,000
10.10
$1,980
003-518-005-05
03/05/24 WD ~~ 03-ARM'S LENGTH
$20,000
10.02
$1,996
0
NEELANI
$2,000
03-ARM'S LENGTH
$2,495
0
$2,500
0
2-02
2
/
{
0.00
$2,800
002-035-012-13 2404 SUNNY RIDGE LAN
~~ 07/10/24 WD ~~ 03-ARM'S LENGTH
$32,000
9.50Page 7
Big
Page 8
Ge
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Loretta J Klebba, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-000989 Township Of Big Creek, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent has failed to file an answer. See TTR 281. Respondent must file an answer within 14 days of the entry of this order. Small Claims answer forms can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: June 25, 2026 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-000989 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Loretta J Klebba, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-000989 Township Of Big Creek, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent has failed to file an answer. See TTR 281. Respondent must file an answer within 14 days of the entry of this order. Small Claims answer forms can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.2 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: June 25, 2026 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 26-000989 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING RECEIVED APR 08 2026 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL. MARLON |. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Loretta J. Klebba Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 47049 Lauren Court City or Town State ZIP Code Van Buren Township MI 48111 Telephone Number 734 968-7586 ljholstenmailbox@gmail.com Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized I Representative’s Contact Information First Name M.I. Last Name Firm Name (if any) Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) Section 3: Subject Property Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. How many parcels are you appealing? [J ves* If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? No** **If No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel Property Address (No., Street) 136 Ray Road City or Town Count "Oscoda State ZIP Code 48647
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) [4 True Cash and Taxable Value [OJ Taxable Value Only (calculation) [/ Uncapping of Taxable Value Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal My husband and | purchased the property in August 2025 for the realtor's full listed price of $90,000 and believe this amount is the current True Cash value of this property. The Realtor estimated the property to have a market value of $85,000 to $95,000 (see attached Market Analysis). The previous owner purchased the property in December 11, 2024. The taxable value for the previous owner for 2025 was $45, 715. As a new owner as of August 2025, our uncapped proposed 2026 taxable value was increased to $59,300. The taxable value difference for 2025 and the proposed taxable value for 2026 is $13,585. The proposed 2026 taxable value is 22.91% higher than the taxable value for 2025 even though the property had been purchased by the previous owner on December 11, 2024. We believe that the uncapping of the property should have precipitated a lower taxable value because of the market value of $30,000. Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [v4] Yes Od No If Yes, check which BOR you attended: [wi] March O July O December If No, please check the applicable reason(s): a Not required to attend O Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) Od Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order O Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping [J other if you checked “other” above, explain:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 7: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Number: 001 -325-01 8-60 Classification of Property: Real J Personal [4 (check one) Agricultural J Commercial J Industrial J Residential Timber-Cutover [J Developmental [J Utility (J (check one) ‘Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: by the Board of Review: 59,300 59,300 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 90,000 or less What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed value by .5) assessed value) 45,000 45,000 Fee Information Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at issue? O Yes v4) No If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees. If the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00 If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $125.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $Over $500,000.00 $300.00 If the property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. If the property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed.
Page 4
Michig
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Loretta J Klebba, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-000989 Township Of Big Creek, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: May 14, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Loretta J Klebba, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-000989 Township Of Big Creek, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: May 14, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Loretta J Klebba, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-000989 Township Of Big Creek, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: May 14, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING RECEIVED APR 08 2026 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL. MARLON |. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Loretta J. Klebba Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 47049 Lauren Court City or Town State ZIP Code Van Buren Township MI 48111 Telephone Number 734 968-7586 ljholstenmailbox@gmail.com Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized I Representative’s Contact Information First Name M.I. Last Name Firm Name (if any) Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) Section 3: Subject Property Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. How many parcels are you appealing? [J ves* If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? No** **If No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel Property Address (No., Street) 136 Ray Road City or Town Count "Oscoda State ZIP Code 48647
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) [4 True Cash and Taxable Value [OJ Taxable Value Only (calculation) [/ Uncapping of Taxable Value Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal My husband and | purchased the property in August 2025 for the realtor's full listed price of $90,000 and believe this amount is the current True Cash value of this property. The Realtor estimated the property to have a market value of $85,000 to $95,000 (see attached Market Analysis). The previous owner purchased the property in December 11, 2024. The taxable value for the previous owner for 2025 was $45, 715. As a new owner as of August 2025, our uncapped proposed 2026 taxable value was increased to $59,300. The taxable value difference for 2025 and the proposed taxable value for 2026 is $13,585. The proposed 2026 taxable value is 22.91% higher than the taxable value for 2025 even though the property had been purchased by the previous owner on December 11, 2024. We believe that the uncapping of the property should have precipitated a lower taxable value because of the market value of $30,000. Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [v4] Yes Od No If Yes, check which BOR you attended: [wi] March O July O December If No, please check the applicable reason(s): a Not required to attend O Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) Od Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order O Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping [J other if you checked “other” above, explain:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 7: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Number: 001 -325-01 8-60 Classification of Property: Real J Personal [4 (check one) Agricultural J Commercial J Industrial J Residential Timber-Cutover [J Developmental [J Utility (J (check one) ‘Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: by the Board of Review: 59,300 59,300 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 90,000 or less What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed value by .5) assessed value) 45,000 45,000 Fee Information Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at issue? O Yes v4) No If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees. If the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00 If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $125.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $Over $500,000.00 $300.00 If the property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. If the property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed.
Page 4
Michig
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.