Lindsay M Redick, Petitioner V Township Of Richfield, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Lindsay M Redick
- Respondent
- Township Of Richfield
Case overview
- Docket number
- 25-003298-TT
- Status
- Default Respondent
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Genesee
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | Order Holding Party in Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/21/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 11 | Failed to Appear - Respondent | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/21/2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| 10 | Evidence was received. | RESP | Not recorded | 09/29/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | Evidence was received. | PET | Not recorded | 09/25/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | Notice of Hearing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/19/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | A hearing has been scheduled | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/19/2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| 6 | A petition was received. | PET | 1 | 09/30/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 09/03/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Notice of Filing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/11/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 09/02/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/02/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 06/16/2025 | $200.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Lindsay M Redick, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003298 Township Of Richfield, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Respondent failed to appear for the duly-noticed hearing scheduled for October 21, 2026. Thus, this case is subject to dismissal or a default hearing. Prior to dismissal or the scheduling of a default hearing, however, the Tribunal finds that placing the absent party in default and ordering an explanation and documentation justifying the absence at the proceeding is appropriate.1 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the absent party is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall submit information and documentation as directed above. The response must be filed with the Tribunal and served on the opposing party or the opposing party’s authorized representative within 14 days of entry of this order.2 Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this case or the scheduling of a default hearing, as provided by TTR 237. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: October 21, 2026 1 See Grimm v Department of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-003298 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Lindsay M Redick, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003298 Township Of Richfield, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Respondent failed to appear for the duly-noticed hearing scheduled for October 21, 2026. Thus, this case is subject to dismissal or a default hearing. Prior to dismissal or the scheduling of a default hearing, however, the Tribunal finds that placing the absent party in default and ordering an explanation and documentation justifying the absence at the proceeding is appropriate.3 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the absent party is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall submit information and documentation as directed above. The response must be filed with the Tribunal and served on the opposing party or the opposing party’s authorized representative within 14 days of entry of this order.4 Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this case or the scheduling of a default hearing, as provided by TTR 237. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: October 21, 2026 3 See Grimm v Department of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 4 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 25-003298 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED OCT 06 2026 MICHIGAN Tax TRIBUNAL Michigan Tax Tribunal Docket Number: 25-003298 Parcel Tax I.D. No. 16-26-576-011 Property Address: 4133 N Henderson Rd Petitioner: Lindsay M. Redick 4133 N Henderson Rd Davison, MI 48423 Respondent: Richfield Township 5381 N State Rd Davison, MI 48423 Prepared by: Todd Keyworth, MAAO Richfield Township Assessor
Page 2
MOAHR Docket Number: 25-003298 The following information is not an appraisal, it has been compiled to assist the Michigan Tax Tribunal in making a fair and equitable decision of the value of the property under appeal on MOAHR Docket Number 25-003298. Background: The petitioner appealed the subject property to the 2025 Richfield Township March Board of Review with the 11/13/2024 purchase price of $135,000 as evidence of her opinion of true cash value. The Board of Review denied the appeal as they did not believe the sale price represented actual market value. The 2025 original and board of review values as well as the 2026 values are as follows. The property was uncapped for 2025 due to the 2024 transfer of ownership. 2025 Assessed and Taxable Values: Original Assessed Value Original Capped Value Original Taxable Value $120,600 $58,554 $120,600 Board Assessed Value Board Capped Value Board Taxable Value $120,600 $58,554 $120,600 2026 Assessed and Taxable Values: Original Assessed Value Original Capped Value Original Taxable Value $123,100 $123,856 $123,100
Page 3
MOAHR Docket Number: 25-003298 Subject Property: The subject property consists of 1.148 Acres of land with 200 feet of frontage on N Henderson Road and 250 feet of depth. The property is primarily level. The property is improved with a 1,422 square foot single family residence built in 1966. It is a tri-level style home with an attached garage, there is also a 302 Sq.Ft. detached garage on the property. An aerial photo of the property is below, the property lines indicated in blue are a reasonably close representation but should not be assumed to be a definitive boundary line. 165265476011
Page 4
Direct Sales Comparison Approach
- 2025
Subject Property
COMP #1
|
Adjustments
COMP #2
|
Adjustments
COMP #3
|
Adjustments
COMP #4
Adjustments
Address
4133 N Henderson Rd
11399 E Stanley Rd
12324 E Mt Morris Rd
8492 E Mt Morris Rd
8177 E Potter Rd
Parcel ID
16-26-576-011
16-11-400-014
16-01-400-009
16-08-200-010
16-32-300-029
Sale Date
11/13/2024
6/26/2023
6/16/2023
4/19/2023
6/27/2023
Sale Price
$135,000
$290,000
$235,000
$205,000
$264,000
Terms
Arm's Length
Arm's Length
Arm's Length
Arm's Length
Sales Price/Sq.Ft.
$188.80
$174.33
$133.81
$173.68
Use
Single Family
Single Family
Single Family
Single Family
Single Family
Location
Richfield Twp Main Road
|Richfield Twp Main Road
Richfield Twp Main Road
Richfield Twp Main Road
Richfield Twp Main Road
Square Feet
1,422
1,536
-$2,850.00{1,348
1,532
-$2,750.00(1,520
-$2,450.00
Year Built
1966
1978
-$1,500.00|1972
1978
-$1,500.00|1982
-$3,000.00
Condition
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Baths
1 Full 1 Half
2 Full
1 Half
$1,500.00]|1 Full 1 Half
1 Full
1 Half
1 Full
1 Half
Bedrooms
3 Bedrooms
3 Bedrooms
3 Bedrooms
3 Bedrooms
3 Bedrooms
Style
Tri Level
Tri Level
Tri Level
Tri Level
Tri Level
Construction
Frame
Frame
Frame
Frame
Frame
Foundation
Basement
Basement
Basement
Basement
Basement
Heat
Forced Air
Forced Air
Forced Air
Forced Air
Forced Air
Garage
2+ 1/2 Car
2 Car
$1,750.00{2 Car
$1,750.00(2 Car
$1,750.00|2 Car
$1,750.00
Fireplace
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Porches
1 CPP, Patio
1 CCP, Deck
1 CCP, Deck
1 CCP
1 CCP, Deck
Out Bldgs.
320 SF Detached Garage
1,200 SF Pole Barn
-$3,000.00|480 SF Det Garage
768 SF Pole Barn
-$3,000.00(1500 SF Pole Barn
-$3,000.00
Lot Size
1.148
2.51
-$17,000.00]2.00
-$10,650.00/0.69
$5,700.00|1.98
-$10,400.00
Net Adjustments
($21,100)
($8,900)
$200
($17,100)
Gross Adjustments
$27,600
$12,400
$14,700
$20,600
Adjusted Sales Price
$268,900
$226,100
$205,200
$246,900.
% Net Adjustments
-7.28%
-3.79%!
0.10%
-6.48%
% Gross Adjustments
9.52%
5.28%!
7.17%!
7.80%!
Adjusted Price/Sq.Ft.
$175.07
$167.73
$133.94.
$162.43
Range
$205,200 - $268,900
Mean
$236,775
Median
$236,500
My conclusion of value: $236,800
My conclusion of value is the mean.Page 5
Direct Sales Comparison Approach - 2026
Subject Property
COMP #1
|
Adjustments
COMP #2
I
Adjustments
COMP #3
|
Adjustments
COMP #4
Adjustments
COMP _#5
Adjustments
COMP _#6
Adjustments
Address
4133 N Henderson Rd
11399 E Stanley Rd
12324 E Mt Morris Rd
8492 E Mt Morris Rd
8177 E Potter Rd
8393 N Gale Rd
11093 Carr Rd
Parcel ID
16-26-576-011
16-11-400-014
16-01-400-009
16-08-200-010
16-32-300-029
16-05-526-015
16-11-501-025
Sale Date
11/13/2024
6/26/2023
6/16/2023
4/19/2023
6/27/2023
4/27/2026
1/12/2026
Sale Price
$135.000
$290,000
$235,000
$205,000
$264,000
$243,000
$219.900
Terms
Arm's Length
Arm's Length
Arm's Length
Arm's Length
Arm's Length
Arm's Length
Sales Price/Sq.Ft.
$188.80
$174.33
$133.81
$173.68
$178.68
$150.20
Use
Single Family
Single Family
Single Family
Single Family
Single Family
Single Family
Single Family
Location
Richfield Twp Main Road
[Richfield Twp Main Road
Richfield Twp Main Road
Richfield Twp Main Road
Richfield Twp Main Road
Richfield Twp Main Road
Richfield Twp Main Road
Square Feet
1.422
1,536
-$2,850.00|1,348
1,532
-$2,750.00(1,520
-$2,450.00/1,360
1,464
Year Built
1966
1978
-$1,500.00{1972
1978
-$1.500.00{1982
-$3,000.00(1969
1974
$1,500.00
Condition
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Baths
1 Full
1 Half
2 Full 1 Half
$1,500.00|1 Full
1 Half
1 Full
1 Half
1 Full
1 Half
1 Full
1 Half
1 Full 1 Half
Bedrooms
3 Bedrooms
3 Bedrooms
3 Bedrooms
3 Bedrooms
3 Bedrooms
3 Bedrooms
3 Bedrooms
Style
TriPage 6
Subje
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED
SEP 2 9 2078
September 23, 2025
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
To Whom
it may concern,
RE: 4133
N. llenderson Rd.. Davison, MI
48423
Parcel No. 16-26-576-011
Chur Office was contracted 10 List for sale the abave mention property by the previous
owner. We were not the first company the owner had the home on the market with. the
seller had fired that company because people wha came to view the home usually left
shorty after entering the front door. The smell was horrific duc to the animals and many
years of heavy nick teen lingering yet inthe air.
The home also contained a lot of
clutter/debris and deferred maintenance throughout the house. garage and bam.
Using the seller's price to start at $212,900, shawing activity started right away.
Feedback after the showings were not on the positive side. "Too high of price for the
amount of work needed for the asking price” was the overall comment. Other comments
were Oil furnace and no natural gas, no front garage door (the opening had been boarded
up).
To repair it meant more than replacing a garage door but the whole [rant ol the
garage needed to be rebuilt.
2 prospective buyers [elt the barn out back needed to be torn
down or as least the roof torn off and replaced.
]
After the first 30 days on the market the seller consented to adjusting the price
downward in increments of $5,000 1 $10,000. Over the next 5 months,
1 written otter,
and
2 verbal offers were offered. The 2 different verbal offers were by builders who
)
would not go more than $100,000 knowing that they would be investing another $75.000
to $100,000 was needed to complete the renovations appealing to most buyers.
We
did everything we could te market this property. Over 30 showings and 3 price
5. Another company {ound the buyer (now the owner). The list price was
000 when their offer was submitted to the seller. There was 2 weeks of
fio
fue to home inspection results and
The final pric
n all the
tiations after the initial offer was made d
‘
;
timates for the many repairs
including electrical and plumbing.
;
Aly
more than any other buyer was willing to pay based 0
he time.
oo
v questions. My number is 810-577-7594.Page 2
Lindsay Redo. PINTY DOM Ny IS -z AUR Soong Sey, .
Page 3
Radek UIs NW. lendtrsen Ra Tyouisoh; MIL 48403 LETS Ed oz g 2 ds Pax 9 Oay METROPLEX M1 480 25 SEP 2026 PM14L _ COaQN0en BX Nmned QQ HOY NI \Lonsivg, COL HR ADA SEEDS T TEESE slog h eed fe beg J Eg
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Lindsay M Redick, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No.: 25-003298 Township Of Richfield, Respondent. NOTICE OF TELEPHONE HEARING The Tribunal has scheduled a telephone hearing to be conducted as follows. Hearings are generally 30 minutes in length. HEARING DATE: October 21, 2026 HEARING TIME: 2:30 PM Eastern Time JOIN BY PHONE: 1-248-509-0316 ACCESS CODE: 98265868 This hearing will be held by telephone conference call with the Judge as the host. In order to join the hearing, call the phone number listed above at least 5 minutes prior to the hearing time. You will then be required to input the access code, followed by # to connect. The Tribunal judge will call in and join by phone at the hearing time. Failure to timely call in may result in the placement of a party or parties in default. This is an important legal document. Please have someone translate the document. Este es un documento legal importante. Por favor, haga traducir este documento. এটি একটি গুরুত্বপূর্ণ আইনি দলিল, অনুগ্রহ করে কেউ দলিলটিকে অনুবাদ করুন। .ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺛﻴﻘﺔ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻴﺔ ﻫﺎﻣﺔ ﻳﺮﺟﻰ ﻟﺪﻳﻚ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺗﺘﺮﺟﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﻴﻘﺔ Ito ay isang mahalagang legal na dokumento. Mangyari lamang na magkaroon ng isang tao isalin ang dokumento.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-003298 Page 2 of 4 HEARING INFORMATION – PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY GENERAL INFORMATION: An impartial hearing will be conducted in accordance with the Michigan Tax Tribunal Rules (R 792.10201-R 792.10297) and the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act, MCL 24.201 et seq. The Michigan Rules of Evidence and the Michigan Court Rules may be applicable. Parties are expected to exercise proper respect and courtesy toward other parties, witnesses, and administrative law judges, which includes attending the hearing on time, silencing cell phones, and choosing a quiet, private location to participate in the hearing to limit distractions and ensure minimal background noise. The hearing may be recorded for notetaking purposes, but the recording is not a formal record, unless otherwise provided for by the Tribunal. REPRESENTATION: You may have an attorney or anyone else of your choice represent you at the hearing. The Tribunal does not recommend or appoint representatives for you and will not pay for your representative. WITNESSES: You may have anyone join you at the hearing to speak in support of your case. However, the time to present your case is limited and additional time may not be provided to accommodate witness testimony. DOCUMENTATION: Parties are required to submit all documents in support of their contentions to both the Tribunal and the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents were previously submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to both the Tribunal and the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be submitted to the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s electronic filing (e- filing) system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to submission by e-mail. If sent by mail, the documents must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized representative at the address identified in the petition or answer for that party or authorized representative, unless the party or authorized representative filed an appearance or other documentation identifying a different mailing address. The documents do not need to be resubmitted after the Notice of Hearing if they were previously submitted to the Tribunal and the opposing party in this case. If a hearing had previously been scheduled in this case and adjourned, and the adjournment order indicates that the parties are precluded from submitting any further documentary evidence, no further documentary evidence will be accepted even if filed and exchanged as indicated above. INCLUSION OF SUBSEQUENT TAX YEARS: Subsequent tax year assessments are automatically included in valuation appeals once the assessment has been established for that tax year. For purposes of administrative efficiency, the Tribunal considers this date April 1st. As such, the parties should submit documentation and be prepared to discuss subsequent tax year assessments at hearings to be conducted on or after April 1st in a subsequent year. If the hearing is to be conducted prior to April 1st in a subsequent year, taxpayers are required to file a new petition and, if necessary, protest the subsequent tax year assessment at the March Board of Review for that year. MOTIONS/REQUESTS: A motion is a written request filed by a party asking the Tribunal to take certain action. The following motions and requests may be filed by either party regarding the scheduled hearing. Motions and requests may be submitted to the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Motions and requests may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to submission by e-mail. If sent by mail, motions and requests must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized representative at the address identified in the petition or answer for that party or authorized representative, unless the party or authorized representative filed an appearance or other documentation identifying a different mailing address. 1. Motion to Adjourn: Parties may request the hearing be rescheduled (i.e. adjourned). The motion must be submitted to both the Tribunal and the opposing party at least 28 days before the hearing unless there are emergency circumstances. The emergency circumstances must be detailed to justify the granting of what
Page 3
MTT
Page 4
M
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED
JUL 01 2025
STATE OF MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LNG
DIRECTOR
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL
Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or
Non-Property tax disputes.
Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal
(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not
submit this document, you may be held in default.
Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information
Ear
[I
Last Name{Company
Naf
1170: (605
26030230-1
06/30] 25
: Odean I—
oT Un: 25
fat: $20.00
9
ress
(No.
re)
ox or
Rural
Route;
] Ds
IND) SAY
RED 10K
[Iai
a TEE
City or 2
State
ZIP Code
Er
DN
YY eR
Telephone Number
Oo LOH Lo1%
E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)
Wanreo Os @ peo Com
Section 2: Petitioner's AttorneyAuthorized Representative’s Contact Information
First Name
Last Name
Firm Name (if any)
Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Telephone Number
Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email)
Section 3: Subject Property Information
How many
If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?
parcelsareyou
| [7] vest
[] No**
appealing?
*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.
\
**If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted.
Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP)
[If multiple, list first property's address]Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply)
XK] True Cash and Taxable Value
3 Poverty Exemption
[J Taxable Value Only (calculation)
{7 Disabled Veterans Exemption
[71 Uncapping of Taxable Value
[OJ &ligibie Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA)
[1] Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a
[1 Classification
Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption)
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
To oppeall (§ for walk towable Volue YRGsUS
wok T poud foc tra house.
Dy Be condition
OF Wn dung; Toles
NAT toes SNould Re Aged tn LWhak
IT
Ooh
FOC
The NOLL , LINITA WBS HIBS OW fo
Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
Year{s) you are appealing:
Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? x1 Yes
O No
#f Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision:
march
[J July
[3 pecember
{f No, check the applicable reason(s):
Not required to attend
[I] Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner
[I] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5)
[I] Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission OrderPage 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information «use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
Parcel Identification Number:
Lo -a
- ST
- oil
Classification of Property:
Real
Personal
(check one)
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one}
Current Assessed Value {also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:
Io, LOL LOC
Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:
PDO, LOG CC
What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?
HIRT, 06.2
Muitiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.
BL, SOF
if you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.
UE C00
Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunat*
Parcel Identification Number:
Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:
Real
Personal
(check one}
a
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Develgpmental
Utility
(check one)
What do you believe is the property’s classification?
Real
Personal
(check one)
O
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
improved property, how is the property currently being used?
If improved property, for what use was the property designed?Page 4
Poa gman” STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at teast 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? [1 ves Sho Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverly Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? [Hl] Yes Xx No If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are nat required to pay any filing fees. The filing fee Is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $125.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $Over $500,000.00 $300.00 If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and
Page 5
0
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
ray,
Jie
Las
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
GOVERNOR
LANSING
RECEIVED
SEP 09 2025
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
MARLON |. BROWN, DPA
DIRECTOR
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM
VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL
MTT DOCKET NO. 25003298
Section 1: Respondent’s Contact information
First Name
M.A.
Last Name
Richfield Township
Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route}
5381 N State Rd
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Davison
Ml
48423
Telephone Number 810-653-3564
Email Address {do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email)
assessor2@richfieldtwp.org
Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
t
First Name
M.E
Todd
R
Last Name
Keyworth
Firm Name {if any)
Richfield Township Assessor
Mailing Address {No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
5381 N State Rd
2ZiP Code
48423
City or Town
State
Davison
Mi
Telephone Number 810-653-3564
Emait Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email)
assessor2@richfieldtwp.org
Section 3: Subject Property Information
Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 60% or more?
[A
Yes
3 No
Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining?
3 ves
If not, list which parcels adjoin one another,
[8] No
[Iv] Not ApplicablePage 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal
The Assessed Value as equalized does not exceed 50% of True Cash Value. Market
analysis of comparable properties indicates that the 2025 Assessed Value is
appropriate. Evidence will be submitted prior to hearing.
Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues
IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES
Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [] Yes
[No
If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [ March
[1] July
{J pecemver
Hf no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? a Yes
[W] No
*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.
Hf the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [Ml] Yes
[Hl] No
Hf yes, cite the Board’s authority.
Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [m] Yes
[] No
If yes, explain
Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order?
[mn] Yes
[Iv] No
If so, what is the issue date?Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS GOVERNOR LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? [] Yes [i] No If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: a March O July a December List the date the BOR denied Petitioner's Poverty Exemption: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS Did Petitioner request the exemption ata BOR? [] Yes []No If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [] March [J] July [J December Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Real Personal (check one) O Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) Section 6: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 16-26-576-011 Classification of Property: Real Personal (check one) Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: $120,600 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: $120,600 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? $241,200 Multiply the True Cash Value by .6 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. $120,600 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.
Page 4
\ STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Lindsay M Redick Petitioner. Parcel I.D. No. 16-26-576-011 M.T.T. Docket No. 25-003298 RICHFIELD TOWNSHIP, Address 4133 N Henderson Rd Respondent. ) Lindsay M Redick Michigan Tax Tribunal 4133 N Henderson Rd Po Box 30232 Davison, MI 48423 Lansing, MI 48909 Todd Keyworth, MAAO 5381 N State Rd Davison, Michigan 48423 (810) 653-3564 / PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF MICHIGAN) ) SS. COUNTY OF GENESEE) On the date below, | sent by first-class mail a copy of Respondent’s Answer : Lindsay M Redick Michigan Tax Tribunal 4133 N Henderson Rd Po Box 30232 Davison, MI 48423 Lansing, MI 48909 tion, | declare that the statements above are true to the best of my in knowledge, and belief. _ = Todd Kejworth =
Page 5
09'LLS S202 'e0 d3s v8¥ IN ‘NOSIAVa ANI B97 Woy d 3DV1IS0d 's'n 6068¥ 0 6068Y IN ‘Suisuer CETOE x09°0°d leunquil xej ueSiyona 66 0ay JDBS HEST DODD O9TE D20e MA #220435 T0509 STIs am = //ejey IVI 31411433 €2v8Y IN ‘uosine PY 21e1S N T8E diysumoy pjayyo
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Lindsay M Redick, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003298 Township Of Richfield, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal settlement conference process.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-003298 Page 2 of 6 MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or email taxtrib@michigan.gov. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: September 11, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Lindsay M Redick, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003298 Township Of Richfield, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an appeal of a principal
Page 4
MTT
Page 5
STAT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED
JUL 01 2025
STATE OF MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LNG
DIRECTOR
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL
Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or
Non-Property tax disputes.
Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal
(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not
submit this document, you may be held in default.
Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information
Ear
[I
Last Name{Company
Naf
1170: (605
26030230-1
06/30] 25
: Odean I—
oT Un: 25
fat: $20.00
9
ress
(No.
re)
ox or
Rural
Route;
] Ds
IND) SAY
RED 10K
[Iai
a TEE
City or 2
State
ZIP Code
Er
DN
YY eR
Telephone Number
Oo LOH Lo1%
E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)
Wanreo Os @ peo Com
Section 2: Petitioner's AttorneyAuthorized Representative’s Contact Information
First Name
Last Name
Firm Name (if any)
Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Telephone Number
Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email)
Section 3: Subject Property Information
How many
If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?
parcelsareyou
| [7] vest
[] No**
appealing?
*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.
\
**If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted.
Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP)
[If multiple, list first property's address]Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply)
XK] True Cash and Taxable Value
3 Poverty Exemption
[J Taxable Value Only (calculation)
{7 Disabled Veterans Exemption
[71 Uncapping of Taxable Value
[OJ &ligibie Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA)
[1] Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a
[1 Classification
Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption)
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
To oppeall (§ for walk towable Volue YRGsUS
wok T poud foc tra house.
Dy Be condition
OF Wn dung; Toles
NAT toes SNould Re Aged tn LWhak
IT
Ooh
FOC
The NOLL , LINITA WBS HIBS OW fo
Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
Year{s) you are appealing:
Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? x1 Yes
O No
#f Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision:
march
[J July
[3 pecember
{f No, check the applicable reason(s):
Not required to attend
[I] Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner
[I] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5)
[I] Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission OrderPage 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information «use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
Parcel Identification Number:
Lo -a
- ST
- oil
Classification of Property:
Real
Personal
(check one)
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one}
Current Assessed Value {also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:
Io, LOL LOC
Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:
PDO, LOG CC
What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?
HIRT, 06.2
Muitiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.
BL, SOF
if you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.
UE C00
Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunat*
Parcel Identification Number:
Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:
Real
Personal
(check one}
a
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Develgpmental
Utility
(check one)
What do you believe is the property’s classification?
Real
Personal
(check one)
O
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
improved property, how is the property currently being used?
If improved property, for what use was the property designed?Page 4
Poa gman” STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at teast 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? [1 ves Sho Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverly Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? [Hl] Yes Xx No If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are nat required to pay any filing fees. The filing fee Is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $125.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $Over $500,000.00 $300.00 If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and
Page 5
0
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Lindsay M Redick, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003298 Township Of Richfield, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: September 2, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Lindsay M Redick, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003298 Township Of Richfield, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: September 2, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED
JUL 01 2025
STATE OF MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LNG
DIRECTOR
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL
Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or
Non-Property tax disputes.
Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal
(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not
submit this document, you may be held in default.
Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information
Ear
[I
Last Name{Company
Naf
1170: (605
26030230-1
06/30] 25
: Odean I—
oT Un: 25
fat: $20.00
9
ress
(No.
re)
ox or
Rural
Route;
] Ds
IND) SAY
RED 10K
[Iai
a TEE
City or 2
State
ZIP Code
Er
DN
YY eR
Telephone Number
Oo LOH Lo1%
E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)
Wanreo Os @ peo Com
Section 2: Petitioner's AttorneyAuthorized Representative’s Contact Information
First Name
Last Name
Firm Name (if any)
Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Telephone Number
Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email)
Section 3: Subject Property Information
How many
If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?
parcelsareyou
| [7] vest
[] No**
appealing?
*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.
\
**If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted.
Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP)
[If multiple, list first property's address]Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply)
XK] True Cash and Taxable Value
3 Poverty Exemption
[J Taxable Value Only (calculation)
{7 Disabled Veterans Exemption
[71 Uncapping of Taxable Value
[OJ &ligibie Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA)
[1] Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a
[1 Classification
Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption)
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
To oppeall (§ for walk towable Volue YRGsUS
wok T poud foc tra house.
Dy Be condition
OF Wn dung; Toles
NAT toes SNould Re Aged tn LWhak
IT
Ooh
FOC
The NOLL , LINITA WBS HIBS OW fo
Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
Year{s) you are appealing:
Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? x1 Yes
O No
#f Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision:
march
[J July
[3 pecember
{f No, check the applicable reason(s):
Not required to attend
[I] Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner
[I] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5)
[I] Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission OrderPage 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information «use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
Parcel Identification Number:
Lo -a
- ST
- oil
Classification of Property:
Real
Personal
(check one)
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one}
Current Assessed Value {also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:
Io, LOL LOC
Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:
PDO, LOG CC
What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?
HIRT, 06.2
Muitiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.
BL, SOF
if you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.
UE C00
Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunat*
Parcel Identification Number:
Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:
Real
Personal
(check one}
a
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Develgpmental
Utility
(check one)
What do you believe is the property’s classification?
Real
Personal
(check one)
O
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
improved property, how is the property currently being used?
If improved property, for what use was the property designed?Page 4
Poa gman” STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at teast 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? [1 ves Sho Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverly Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? [Hl] Yes Xx No If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are nat required to pay any filing fees. The filing fee Is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $125.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $Over $500,000.00 $300.00 If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and
Page 5
0
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.