Fatima Chehadeh, Fadl Hamade, Petitioners V City Of Dearborn, Respondent

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Fatima Chehadeh and Fadl Hamade, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioners, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003813 

 

City of Dearborn, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT 

 

CONSENT JUDGMENT 

 

The Tribunal has reviewed the Stipulation and finds that it comports with the mandates 

of State law.1 As a result, the Tribunal shall enter the parties’ Stipulation. Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all 

attachments, terms, and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise 

indicated. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment 

rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be 

corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this 

Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the 

affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as 

required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent 

Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a 

proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and 

interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, 

separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being 

refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless 

otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and 

the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the 

Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 

days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest 

shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2020, through June 30, 2022, at the rate of 4.25%, 

(ii) after June 30, 2022, through December 31, 2022, at the rate of 4.27%, (iii) after 

December 31, 2022, through June 30, 2023, at the rate of 5.65%, (iv) after June 30, 

2023, through December 31, 2023, at the rate of 8.25%, (v) after December 31, 2023, 

 

1 See MCL 211.27a. 

2 See MCL 205.755.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003813 

Page 2 of 2 

 

through June 30, 2024, at the rate of 9.30%, (vi) after June 30, 2024, through December 

31, 2024, at the rate of 9.50%, (vii) after December 31, 2024, through June 30, 2025, at 

the rate of 9.47%, (viii) after June 30, 2025, through December 31, 2025, at the rate of 

8.66%, and (ix) after December 31, 2025, through June 30, 2026, at a rate of 8.48%. 

 

This Consent Judgment resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 

 

See docket look up for a copy of stipulation and for any possible refund paragraph. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

Entered: January 8, 2026 

sb 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEMS 

Fatima Chehadeh, Fadl Hamade 

Petitioner, 

MTT Docket No. 24-003813 

City of Dearborn 

Respondent, 

STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT 

AND CONSENT JUDGMENT 

1 

The case is pending in the ___ Entire Tribunal OR 

_X __ Small Claims Division. 

7d 

The subject property isin _ WAYNE 

County. 

3. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board 

Property Parcel No. 82-09-153-02-015 

(If more than one parece] is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form 

addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

4, 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of 

Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

| 

2024 

1,483,800 

741,900 

741,900 

2025 

1,293,600 

646.800 

646.800 

B. 

The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement 

DUIPOSES are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2024 

1,060,000 

530,000 

530,000 

2025 

1,060.000 

530,000 

530.000

Page 2

Docket #- 24-003813 

6. 

 Ifstipulation addresses tax years other than the tax year originally appealed or tax years 

added through motions to amend that have been granted by the Tribunal, list the separate 

facts upon which the parties rely to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over those tax year or 

years (attach additional page if necessary): 

7 

List all reasons (with explanation) why the stipulation’s taxable value does not equal the 

prior year TV multiplied by the applicable inflation rate. (e.g. transfer of ownership, 

additions, losses, omitted property etc...) 

8. 

List separately any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would 

affect the execution of this Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint 

payment of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): 

The Petitioner and their agent hereto agree and stipulate that any 

order or decision of the Michigan Tax Tribunal which may resultin a 

refund shall be made payable to PropTax America for distribution. 

Refund payments shall be forwarded to the following address: 

PropTax America 

26923 Havelock 

Dearborn Heights, MI 48127 

Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

ro Name Sam Miller 

/ PropTax America 

Date: 

1/7/2026 

Signature of 

ondent’s 

authorized representative: 

t 

ondent’s a 

TI) 

ip 

—_— ™ 

% 

regi 

at / Lil JP 

Printed Name — i A Foves 

Date: /- Zz - Vd 

[Consent Judgment will be prepared by the Tribunal.]

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEMS 

Fatima Chehadeh, Fadl Hamade 

Petitioner, 

MTT Docket No. 24-003813 

City of Dearborn 

Respondent, 

STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT 

AND CONSENT JUDGMENT 

1 

The case is pending in the ___ Entire Tribunal OR 

_X __ Small Claims Division. 

7d 

The subject property isin _ WAYNE 

County. 

3. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board 

Property Parcel No. 82-09-153-02-015 

(If more than one parece] is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form 

addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

4, 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of 

Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

| 

2024 

1,483,800 

741,900 

741,900 

2025 

1,293,600 

646.800 

646.800 

B. 

The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement 

DUIPOSES are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2024 

1,060,000 

530,000 

530,000 

2025 

1,060.000 

530,000 

530.000

Page 2

Docket #- 24-003813 

6. 

 Ifstipulation addresses tax years other than the tax year originally appealed or tax years 

added through motions to amend that have been granted by the Tribunal, list the separate 

facts upon which the parties rely to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over those tax year or 

years (attach additional page if necessary): 

7 

List all reasons (with explanation) why the stipulation’s taxable value does not equal the 

prior year TV multiplied by the applicable inflation rate. (e.g. transfer of ownership, 

additions, losses, omitted property etc...) 

8. 

List separately any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would 

affect the execution of this Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint 

payment of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): 

The Petitioner and their agent hereto agree and stipulate that any 

order or decision of the Michigan Tax Tribunal which may resultin a 

refund shall be made payable to PropTax America for distribution. 

Refund payments shall be forwarded to the following address: 

PropTax America 

26923 Havelock 

Dearborn Heights, MI 48127 

Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

ro Name Sam Miller 

/ PropTax America 

Date: 

1/7/2026 

Signature of 

ondent’s 

authorized representative: 

t 

ondent’s a 

TI) 

ip 

—_— ™ 

% 

regi 

at / Lil JP 

Printed Name — i A Foves 

Date: /- Zz - Vd 

[Consent Judgment will be prepared by the Tribunal.]

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Fatima Chehadeh,Fadl Hamade,

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

MTT Docket No.: 24-003813

City Of Dearborn, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF TELEPHONE HEARING

The Tribunal has scheduled a telephone hearing to be conducted as follows. Hearings are 

generally 30 minutes in length. 

HEARING DATE:

February 3, 2026 

HEARING TIME:

9:15 AM EST

JOIN BY PHONE:

1-248-509-0316

ACCESS CODE:

168899778 

 

This hearing will be held by telephone conference call with the Judge as the host. In order to join 

the hearing, call the phone number listed above at least 5 minutes prior to the hearing time. You 

will then be required to input the access code, followed by # to connect. The Tribunal judge will call 

in and join by phone at the hearing time. Failure to timely call in may result in the placement of a 

party or parties in default.

This is an important legal document. Please have someone translate the document.

Este es un documento legal importante. Por favor, haga traducir este documento.

এটি একটি গুরুত্বপূর্ণ আইনি দলিল, অনুগ্রহ করে কেউ দলিলটিকে অনুবাদ করুন।

.ةقيثولا مجرتت صخش كيدل ىجري ةماه ةينوناق ةقيثو وه اذه

Ito ay isang mahalagang legal na dokumento. Mangyari lamang na magkaroon ng isang tao isalin ang 

dokumento.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003813

Page 2 of 12

HEARING INFORMATION – PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY

GENERAL INFORMATION: An impartial hearing will be conducted in accordance with the Michigan Tax 

Tribunal Rules (R 792.10201-R 792.10297) and the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act, MCL 24.201 et 

seq. The Michigan Rules of Evidence and the Michigan Court Rules may be applicable. Parties are expected 

to exercise proper respect and courtesy toward other parties, witnesses, and administrative law judges, which 

includes attending the hearing on time, silencing cell phones, and choosing a quiet, private location to 

participate in the hearing to limit distractions and ensure minimal background noise. The hearing may be 

recorded for notetaking purposes, but the recording is not a formal record, unless otherwise provided for by the 

Tribunal.

REPRESENTATION: You may have an attorney or anyone else of your choice represent you at the hearing. 

The Tribunal does not recommend or appoint representatives for you and will not pay for your representative.

WITNESSES: You may have anyone join you at the hearing to speak in support of your case. However, the 

time to present your case is limited and additional time may not be provided to accommodate witness 

testimony.

DOCUMENTATION: Parties are required to submit all documents in support of their contentions to both the 

Tribunal and the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents were 

previously submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the 

documents are not timely submitted to both the Tribunal and the opposing party, the documents may be 

excluded. Documents may be submitted to the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s electronic filing (e-

filing) system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to 

submission by e-mail. If sent by mail, the documents must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized 

representative at the address identified in the petition or answer for that party or authorized representative, 

unless the party or authorized representative filed an appearance or other documentation identifying a different 

mailing address. The documents do not need to be resubmitted after the Notice of Hearing if they were 

previously submitted to the Tribunal and the opposing party in this case.

If a hearing had previously been scheduled in this case and adjourned, and the adjournment order indicates 

that the parties are precluded from submitting any further documentary evidence, no further documentary 

evidence will be accepted even if filed and exchanged as indicated above.

INCLUSION OF SUBSEQUENT TAX YEARS: Subsequent tax year assessments are automatically included 

in valuation appeals once the assessment has been established for that tax year. For purposes of 

administrative efficiency, the Tribunal considers this date April 1st. As such, the parties should submit 

documentation and be prepared to discuss subsequent tax year assessments at hearings to be conducted on 

or after April 1st in a subsequent year. If the hearing is to be conducted prior to April 1st in a subsequent year, 

taxpayers are required to file a new petition and, if necessary, protest the subsequent tax year assessment at 

the March Board of Review for that year. 

MOTIONS/REQUESTS: A motion is a written request filed by a party asking the Tribunal to take certain action. 

The following motions and requests may be filed by either party regarding the scheduled hearing. Motions and 

requests may be submitted to the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Motions and 

requests may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to submission by e-mail. If 

sent by mail, motions and requests must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized representative at the 

address identified in the petition or answer for that party or authorized representative, unless the party or 

authorized representative filed an appearance or other documentation identifying a different mailing address. 

1. Motion to Adjourn: Parties may request the hearing be rescheduled (i.e. adjourned). The motion must be 

submitted to both the Tribunal and the opposing party at least 28 days before the hearing unless there are 

emergency circumstances. The emergency circumstances must be detailed to justify the granting of what

Page 3

MTT

Page 4

MT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Fatima Chehadeh,Fadl Hamade,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003813

City Of Dearborn,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003813

Page 2 of 8

If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or 

email taxtrib@michigan.gov.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: December 11, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Fatima Chehadeh,Fadl Hamade,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003813

City Of Dearborn,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s

Page 4

MT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

MTT Docket No.: 

Petitioner,

v 

CITY OF DEARBORN, 

Respondent. 

___________________________/ 

PROOF OF SERVICE

On

 



I emailed a copy of the Respondent’s Property Tax 

Appeal answer form for the City of Dearborn relative to the above-captioned matter to: 

I declare that the statement above is true to the best of my information, knowledge, and belief.

Dated: 

________________________________ 

Joseph A. Fuoco, Authorized Representative 

City of Dearborn – Department of Assessment

16901 Michigan Avenue, Suite 5

Dearborn, MI 48126 

____

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

____

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

_ __

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

____

__

__

_ ____

_ ____________

Joseph A. Fu

F oco, Authorized Re

Fadl Hamade

24-003813

October 22, 2024

Michigan Tax Tribunal

October 22, 2024

taxtrib@michigan.gov

Fatima Chehadeh

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Petitioner,

CITY OF DEARBORN, 

Respondent. 

___________________________/ 

PROOF OF SERVICE

On









I email a copy of the Respondent’s Property Tax Appeal 

answer form for the City of Dearborn relative to the above-captioned matter to: 

v. 

MTT Docket No.: 

I declare that the statement above is true to the best of my information, knowledge and belief. 

Dated: 

________________________________ 

Joseph A. Fuoco, Respondent 

City of Dearborn – Department of Assessment

16901 Michigan Avenue, Suite 5 

Dearborn, MI 48126 

______

__

__

__

__

____

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

____

__

__

_ ____

_ ____________

Joseph A. Fu

F oco, Respondent 

Fadl Hamade

24-003813

October 22, 2024

October 22, 2024

PropTax America

Sam Miller

nassco123@yahoo.com

Fatima Chehadeh

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR 

 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

 

MTT DOCKET NO. ______________________ 

 

 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

First Name: 

 

M.I.: 

 

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government: 

 

 

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

 

 

County: 

City or Town: 

 

 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Telephone Number: 

 

 

Fax Number: 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

 

 

 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name: 

 

M.I.: 

Last Name: 

 

 

Firm Name (if any): 

 

 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

 

 

City or Town: 

 

 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Telephone Number: 

 

 

Fax Number: 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

 

 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

 

 Yes 

 No 

 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. 

 

 Yes 

 No 

 Not Applicable 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24-003813

City of Dearborn

16901 Michigan Ave. 

Wayne

Dearborn

MI

48126

313.943.2288

jfuoco@dearborn.gov

Joseph

A

Fuoco

Dearborn

MI

48126

313.943.2288

jfuoco@dearborn.gov

✔

✔

16901 Michigan Ave.

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

 Yes 

 No 

 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

 March 

 July 

 December 

 

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? 

 Yes 

 No 

*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. 

 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

 Yes 

 No 

If yes, cite the Board’s authority. 

 

 

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? 

 Yes 

 No 

If yes, explain 

 

 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

 Yes 

 No 

 

If so, what is the issue date? 

 

 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE 

 

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? 

 

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? 

 

 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION 

 

Respondent will verify and review all pertinent data as well as provide further evidence, 

if needed, prior to the hearing.

Attachment: 2024 Property Record Card, 2024 Assessment Change Notice,

 2024 Board of Review Decision Letter and Proof of Service.

✔

✔

✔

✔

Page 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR 

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? 

 Yes 

 No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

 March 

 July 

 December 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS 

Did Petitioner request the exemption at a BOR? 

 Yes 

 No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

 March 

 July 

 December 

Tax Year(s) denied: 

List the date the exemption was denied: 

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY 

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Real Personal (check one) 

 

 

 Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for

Page 6

***

Page 7

Cl

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-003813

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City Of Dearborn (WAYNE)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Joseph

M.I.

Last Name

Fuoco

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

16901 Michigan Ave

STE. 5

City or Town

Dearborn

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48126

Telephone Number

313-943-2288

Fax Number

E-mail Address

jfuoco@dearborn.gov

Section 3: Subject Property Information

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

Yes

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another.

N/A 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this 

document, you may be held in default.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Respondent will verify and review all pertinent data as well as provide further evidence,

if needed, prior to the hearing.

Attachment: 2024 Property Record Card, 2024 Assessment Change Notice,

2024 Board of Review Decision Letter and Proof of Service.

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? March*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

If yes, cite the Board’s authority.

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No

If yes, explain.

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

If so, what is the issue date?

MI

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued?

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption:

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended:

Tax Year(s) denied:

List the date the exemption was denied:

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number:

821018114025

Classification of Property:

Real 

Residential

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

$741,900

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

$741,900

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

$1,500,000

Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

$750,000

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

$741,900

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Joseph A Fuoco

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

’ 

AUG 072024 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First Name 

Mt 

Last Name/Company Name 

FATIMA/FADL 

CHEHADEH/HAMADE 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

155 GOLFCREST 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

DEARBORN 

Ml 

[48124 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact information 

First Name 

[XN 

Last Name 

Sa 

MILLER 

Firm Name (i any) PROPTAX AME RICA 

Address {No., 8trest, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

26923 HAVELOCK DRIVE 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

DEARBORN HEIGHTS 

Mi 

48127 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

313-377-1447 

E-mail Address (do not enter unfess you want MYT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

NASSCO123@YAHOO.COM 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

ff you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (chect ail that apply) 

True Gash and Taxable Value 

{1 Poverty Exemption 

{] Taxable Vatue Only (calculation) 

[J Disabled Veterans Exemption 

[3 uncapping of Taxable Value 

[J Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

[J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a 

[J Classification 

Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

SEV IS TOO HIGH 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Year(s) you are appealing: 

2024 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

Yes 

O No 

If Yas, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [i March 

[1 uwy 

[J December 

if No, check the applicable reason(s): 

| Not required to attend 

ner

Page 3

gory, 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information use the multiple parce! form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

82 09 153 02 015 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one} 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

{check one) 

Current Assessed Value {also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

741,900 

Currant Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

741,900 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

1,000,000 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .6 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

500,000 

fyou beiteve the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

241,900 

Section 8: Classification Information «only the Mi Dep't of Treasury may appeal this Issue to the Tribunal* 

Parcel Identification Number: 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

a 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one} 

What do you believe is the property's classification? 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

[] 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Hf improved property, how Is the property currently being used? 

if improved property, for what use was the property designed?

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Fee Information 

Doas the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? 

Yes 

a No 

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 

[| Yes 

No 

If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus 

$25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not 

to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. 

if your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention Is: 

Filing Fea is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$126.00 

$100,000.01 to $600,000.00 

$200.00 

$Over $600,600.00 

$300.00 

If your property is NOT residential properly (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00 

* Plus $26.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. 

appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. 

Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be fited. 

Signature aT 

Petitioner or prem 

renee Signature: 

ist 

If your property is NOT residential prope: 

2 the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $100,000.01 or greater the

Page 5

1510 

de 

al 

ipl 

155 4 

SIFIED 

PROVED 

s DENIAL 

Mar 

eview. The Board has 

rev 

ble 

va 

ber 8209153 

02 01 

dete 

mal 

on 

the 

information 

you suppl 

Hy 

Le 

oo 

(11 

Hons 

tn 

7% 

Lee 

I 1] 

2] 

i) 

| 

— 

77

Page 6

pigs 

Ve

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Fatima Chehadeh,Fadl Hamade,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003813

City Of Dearborn,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: October 16, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Fatima Chehadeh,Fadl Hamade,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003813

City Of Dearborn,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: October 16, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

’ 

AUG 072024 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First Name 

Mt 

Last Name/Company Name 

FATIMA/FADL 

CHEHADEH/HAMADE 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

155 GOLFCREST 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

DEARBORN 

Ml 

[48124 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact information 

First Name 

[XN 

Last Name 

Sa 

MILLER 

Firm Name (i any) PROPTAX AME RICA 

Address {No., 8trest, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

26923 HAVELOCK DRIVE 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

DEARBORN HEIGHTS 

Mi 

48127 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

313-377-1447 

E-mail Address (do not enter unfess you want MYT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

NASSCO123@YAHOO.COM 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

ff you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (chect ail that apply) 

True Gash and Taxable Value 

{1 Poverty Exemption 

{] Taxable Vatue Only (calculation) 

[J Disabled Veterans Exemption 

[3 uncapping of Taxable Value 

[J Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

[J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a 

[J Classification 

Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

SEV IS TOO HIGH 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Year(s) you are appealing: 

2024 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

Yes 

O No 

If Yas, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [i March 

[1 uwy 

[J December 

if No, check the applicable reason(s): 

| Not required to attend 

ner

Page 3

gory, 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information use the multiple parce! form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

82 09 153 02 015 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one} 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

{check one) 

Current Assessed Value {also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

741,900 

Currant Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

741,900 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

1,000,000 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .6 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

500,000 

fyou beiteve the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

241,900 

Section 8: Classification Information «only the Mi Dep't of Treasury may appeal this Issue to the Tribunal* 

Parcel Identification Number: 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

a 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one} 

What do you believe is the property's classification? 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

[] 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Hf improved property, how Is the property currently being used? 

if improved property, for what use was the property designed?

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Fee Information 

Doas the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? 

Yes 

a No 

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 

[| Yes 

No 

If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus 

$25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not 

to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. 

if your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention Is: 

Filing Fea is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$126.00 

$100,000.01 to $600,000.00 

$200.00 

$Over $600,600.00 

$300.00 

If your property is NOT residential properly (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00 

* Plus $26.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. 

appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. 

Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be fited. 

Signature aT 

Petitioner or prem 

renee Signature: 

ist 

If your property is NOT residential prope: 

2 the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $100,000.01 or greater the

Page 5

1510 

de 

al 

ipl 

155 4 

SIFIED 

PROVED 

s DENIAL 

Mar 

eview. The Board has 

rev 

ble 

va 

ber 8209153 

02 01 

dete 

mal 

on 

the 

information 

you suppl 

Hy 

Le 

oo 

(11 

Hons 

tn 

7% 

Lee 

I 1] 

2] 

i) 

| 

— 

77

Page 6

pigs 

Ve

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.