Record Finder / 26-002872-TT
Michigan
Evan S Albazi Petitioner V City Of Detroit Respondent
- Petitioner
- Evan S Albazi
- Respondent
- City Of Detroit
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-002872-TT
- Status
- Default Petitioner
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Wayne
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Order of Default of Petitioner | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/06/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 10/06/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/06/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/29/2026 | $125.00 | Download |
Documents
SC_Order_of_Default_of_Petition.2026-10-06_09-16-04.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Evan S Albazi, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002872 City of Detroit, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 14 days of the entry of this order. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: October 6, 2026 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5). MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002872 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Evan S Albazi, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002872 City of Detroit, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 14 days of the entry of this order. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.2 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: October 6, 2026 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5). MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 26-002872 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
scpetition_valuation.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. Petitioner’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Local Unit of Government: Individual First Name M.I. Last Name Evan Albazi Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 13837 Strathmore Dr. City or Town State ZIP Code Shelby Township Michigan 48315 Telephone Number 5868798962 E-mail Address evan.albazi@gmail.com Subject Property Information: How many parcels are you appealing? If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 1 *If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel N/A Property Address (No., Street) 4427 14th St City or Town County State ZIP Code Detroit Wayne Michigan 48208 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City of Detroit (Wayne) Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Uncapping of Taxable Value Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal: 1 of 3
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR I respectfully request that the Michigan Tax Tribunal reduce the assessed value, State Equalized Value (SEV), and taxable value of my property located at 4427 14th Street, Detroit, Michigan, because the current assessment does not accurately reflect the property's true cash value or its actual physical condition. I purchased this property for $27,500. Despite this purchase price, the City of Detroit has assigned the property an SEV, assessed value, and taxable value of $39,700. The recent purchase price is strong evidence of the property's true market value. At the time of purchase, the structure was in an extremely deteriorated condition and was completely uninhabitable. The property remains vacant because it is unsafe and unsuitable for occupancy. The home cannot legally or practically be occupied without extensive rehabilitation. The building has multiple large holes in the roof, allowing prolonged water intrusion that has caused extensive damage throughout the interior of the structure for many years. The property has no functioning electrical system, no working plumbing, and no operational heating or cooling system. These deficiencies alone render the property unsuitable for occupancy. In addition, the interior of the building remains filled with trash, debris, and discarded materials left by the prior owner, requiring substantial cleanup before rehabilitation can even begin. The exterior of the property is similarly neglected, with extensive overgrowth from trees, weeds, and vegetation, as well as deteriorated fencing and scattered debris surrounding the structure. The property's condition is so severe that it has been placed on the City of Detroit's demolition list. This fact further demonstrates the extent of the deterioration and supports that the structure has little to no contributory value in its current condition. Based on contractor estimates and the extensive work required, the property will require at least $400,000 in rehabilitation costs to restore it to a safe, habitable condition and remove it from the City's demolition list. These repairs include, but are not limited to, replacement of the roof, structural rehabilitation, remediation of water damage, complete replacement of electrical, plumbing, and HVAC systems, interior reconstruction, debris removal, exterior cleanup, and other substantial improvements necessary to comply with applicable building and safety codes. The current assessment does not adequately account for the property's extensive physical deterioration, lack of utility service, vacancy, demolition status, or extraordinary rehabilitation costs. The property's actual market value is reflected by its recent purchase price of $27,500, not by the significantly higher assessed value currently assigned. As an owner committed to rehabilitating this property and improving the surrounding neighborhood, I intend to invest substantial personal funds into restoring the structure rather than abandoning it. A reduction in the property's taxable value would allow more financial resources to be directed toward rehabilitation, code compliance, and removing the property from the demolition list, ultimately benefiting both the neighborhood and the City. For these reasons, I respectfully request that the Michigan Tax Tribunal reduce the assessed value, State Equalized Value, and taxable value of this property to an amount that more accurately reflects its true cash value and documented condition as of the applicable tax day. Jurisdictional Issues: Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: March If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Year(s) Under Appeal: 1 2 of 3
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal: Parcel Number: 10005192. Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 39700 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 39700 What do you believe is the fair market value? 27500 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 10000 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 10000 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner’s Signature: /s/ Evan Albazi Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/ Fee Information: If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
SC_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-10-06_09-14-46.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Evan S Albazi, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002872 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: October 6, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Evan S Albazi, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002872 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: October 6, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
scpetition_valuation.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. Petitioner’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Local Unit of Government: Individual First Name M.I. Last Name Evan Albazi Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 13837 Strathmore Dr. City or Town State ZIP Code Shelby Township Michigan 48315 Telephone Number 5868798962 E-mail Address evan.albazi@gmail.com Subject Property Information: How many parcels are you appealing? If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 1 *If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel N/A Property Address (No., Street) 4427 14th St City or Town County State ZIP Code Detroit Wayne Michigan 48208 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City of Detroit (Wayne) Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Uncapping of Taxable Value Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal: 1 of 3
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR I respectfully request that the Michigan Tax Tribunal reduce the assessed value, State Equalized Value (SEV), and taxable value of my property located at 4427 14th Street, Detroit, Michigan, because the current assessment does not accurately reflect the property's true cash value or its actual physical condition. I purchased this property for $27,500. Despite this purchase price, the City of Detroit has assigned the property an SEV, assessed value, and taxable value of $39,700. The recent purchase price is strong evidence of the property's true market value. At the time of purchase, the structure was in an extremely deteriorated condition and was completely uninhabitable. The property remains vacant because it is unsafe and unsuitable for occupancy. The home cannot legally or practically be occupied without extensive rehabilitation. The building has multiple large holes in the roof, allowing prolonged water intrusion that has caused extensive damage throughout the interior of the structure for many years. The property has no functioning electrical system, no working plumbing, and no operational heating or cooling system. These deficiencies alone render the property unsuitable for occupancy. In addition, the interior of the building remains filled with trash, debris, and discarded materials left by the prior owner, requiring substantial cleanup before rehabilitation can even begin. The exterior of the property is similarly neglected, with extensive overgrowth from trees, weeds, and vegetation, as well as deteriorated fencing and scattered debris surrounding the structure. The property's condition is so severe that it has been placed on the City of Detroit's demolition list. This fact further demonstrates the extent of the deterioration and supports that the structure has little to no contributory value in its current condition. Based on contractor estimates and the extensive work required, the property will require at least $400,000 in rehabilitation costs to restore it to a safe, habitable condition and remove it from the City's demolition list. These repairs include, but are not limited to, replacement of the roof, structural rehabilitation, remediation of water damage, complete replacement of electrical, plumbing, and HVAC systems, interior reconstruction, debris removal, exterior cleanup, and other substantial improvements necessary to comply with applicable building and safety codes. The current assessment does not adequately account for the property's extensive physical deterioration, lack of utility service, vacancy, demolition status, or extraordinary rehabilitation costs. The property's actual market value is reflected by its recent purchase price of $27,500, not by the significantly higher assessed value currently assigned. As an owner committed to rehabilitating this property and improving the surrounding neighborhood, I intend to invest substantial personal funds into restoring the structure rather than abandoning it. A reduction in the property's taxable value would allow more financial resources to be directed toward rehabilitation, code compliance, and removing the property from the demolition list, ultimately benefiting both the neighborhood and the City. For these reasons, I respectfully request that the Michigan Tax Tribunal reduce the assessed value, State Equalized Value, and taxable value of this property to an amount that more accurately reflects its true cash value and documented condition as of the applicable tax day. Jurisdictional Issues: Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: March If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Year(s) Under Appeal: 1 2 of 3
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal: Parcel Number: 10005192. Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 39700 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 39700 What do you believe is the fair market value? 27500 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 10000 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 10000 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner’s Signature: /s/ Evan Albazi Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/ Fee Information: If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.