2D2M LLC, Petitioner V Township Of Hadley, Respondent
- Petitioner
- 2D2M LLC
- Respondent
- Township Of Hadley
Case overview
- Docket number
- 25-002701-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Lapeer
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | Consent Judgment | Not recorded | 12 | 12/09/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 13 | Granted | Not recorded | 12 | 12/09/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 12 | A Stipulation has been received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 12/03/2025 | $25.00 | Download |
| 11 | Order Setting Aside P Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 11/05/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 10 | Filing Fee Received | PET | Not recorded | 09/26/2025 | $75.00 | Download |
| 9 | Order Holding Petitioner in Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/17/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | Order Setting Aside Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/06/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Notice of Filing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/01/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Filing Fee Received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/01/2025 | $125.00 | Download |
| 5 | Response to Order - Petition | PET | Not recorded | 07/14/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Attachments to the Answer were filed | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/30/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/30/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Order Holding Petitioner in Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/11/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | Order Severing 44-010-036-026-00 from 25-002623 | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/11/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 2D2M LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-002701 Hadley Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Marcus L. Abood ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the Stipulation and finds that it comports with the mandates of State law.1 As a result, the Tribunal shall enter the parties’ Stipulation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise indicated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2013, through June 30, 2016, at the rate of 4.25%, (ii) after June 30, 2016, through December 31, 2016, at the rate of 4.40%, (iii) after December 31, 2016, through June 30, 2017, at the rate of 4.50%, (iv) after June 30, 2017, through December 31, 2017, at the rate of 4.70%, (v) after December 31, 2017, 1 See MCL 211.27a. 2 See MCL 205.755.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002701 Page 2 of 2 through June 30, 2018, at the rate of 5.15%, (vi) after June 30, 2018, through December 31, 2018, at the rate of 5.41%, (vii) after December 31, 2018, through June 30, 2019, at the rate of 5.9%, (viii) after June 30, 2019, through December 31, 2019, at the rate of 6.39%, (ix) after December 31, 2019, through June 30, 2020, at the rate of 6.40%, (x) after June 30 2020, through December 31, 2020, at the rate of 5.63%, (xi) after December 31, 2020, through June 30, 2022, at the rate of 4.25%, (xii) after June 30, 2022, through December 31, 2022, at the rate of 4.27%, (xiii) after December 31, 2022, through June 30, 2023, at the rate of 5.65%, (xiv) after June 30, 2023, through December 31, 2023, at the rate of 8.25%, (xv) after December 31, 2023, through June 30, 2024, at the rate of 9.30%, (xvi) after June 30, 2024, through December 31, 2024, at the rate of 9.50%, (xvii) after December 31, 2024, through June 30, 2025, at the rate of 9.47%, (xviii) after June 30, 2025, through December 31, 2025, at the rate of 8.66%, and (xix) after December 31, 2025, through June 30, 2026, at a rate of 8.48%. This Consent Judgment resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. See docket look up for a copy of stipulation and for any possible refund paragraph. By Entered: December 9, 2025 jcr PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
Tranlnfo:4606 Chidt: 1 ID: POLTER LAW GROU HRs RECEIVED : DEC 08 2025 GRETCHEN WHITMER it Ame ki DEPARTMENT OF Hozawia aN REGULATORY AFFAIRS ORLENEHANIPAX TRIBUNAL 2D2M LLC 5 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MOAHR Docket No. 25-002701 Hadley Twp. , Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT (VALUATION) 1. The subject property Is in Lapeer County. 2. Parcel Number; 44-010-036-026-00 . (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax year Assessed Value (AV) | Taxable Value (TV) 2025 471,300 471,300 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax year True Cash Value AV TV 2025 746,000 373,000 373,000 5. If the stipulated TV does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable inflation rate multiplier, explain why (e.g., transfer of ownership, additions, losses, omitted property etc.)
Page 2
MOAHR Docket No. 25-002701 Page 2 of 2 of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page If necessary): to be made payable jointly to Petition: d Polter Law (Rep) and mailed to "Polter Law" 2600 W Big Beaver Ste L100, Troy, MI 48084. Petitioner agrees to waive any and all interest relative to any refund due. NOTE: The Stipulation MUST Include ALL parcels and ALL tax years included in the appeal (including subsequent tax years on or after April 1 of each year for appeals pending in the Small Claims Division). The parties may agree, however, to withdraw the appeal of specific parcels and/or tax year(s). IF APPLICABLE, complete the following section(s). Otherwise, LEAVE BLANK, 7. The parties agree to the withdrawal of parcel number: (If more than one parcel is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing all other parcels being withdrawn.) 8. The parties agree to the withdrawal of tax year(s) Signdture of Petitioner's Authorized Reprege A Petitioner: oF [> b | ~~ ~> Printed Name: Stephen Polter (P72591) Date: Nov 25, 2025 Signature of Respondent's authorized representative: Tina P. QAML ARN, Asse SSN Printed Name: Tina Papineau, Assessor Date: la/a/25
Page 3
EPT/N EXPRESS PROPERTY TAX APPEALS LLC A division of Polter Law Group 2600 W Big Beaver | Ste L100 Troy, MI 48084 US 0 B26 6 HE TT EEE en Le AR RU PU A EY BE TU ER UE
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
Tranlnfo:4606 Chidt: 1 ID: POLTER LAW GROU HRs RECEIVED : DEC 08 2025 GRETCHEN WHITMER it Ame ki DEPARTMENT OF Hozawia aN REGULATORY AFFAIRS ORLENEHANIPAX TRIBUNAL 2D2M LLC 5 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MOAHR Docket No. 25-002701 Hadley Twp. , Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT (VALUATION) 1. The subject property Is in Lapeer County. 2. Parcel Number; 44-010-036-026-00 . (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax year Assessed Value (AV) | Taxable Value (TV) 2025 471,300 471,300 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax year True Cash Value AV TV 2025 746,000 373,000 373,000 5. If the stipulated TV does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable inflation rate multiplier, explain why (e.g., transfer of ownership, additions, losses, omitted property etc.)
Page 2
MOAHR Docket No. 25-002701 Page 2 of 2 of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page If necessary): to be made payable jointly to Petition: d Polter Law (Rep) and mailed to "Polter Law" 2600 W Big Beaver Ste L100, Troy, MI 48084. Petitioner agrees to waive any and all interest relative to any refund due. NOTE: The Stipulation MUST Include ALL parcels and ALL tax years included in the appeal (including subsequent tax years on or after April 1 of each year for appeals pending in the Small Claims Division). The parties may agree, however, to withdraw the appeal of specific parcels and/or tax year(s). IF APPLICABLE, complete the following section(s). Otherwise, LEAVE BLANK, 7. The parties agree to the withdrawal of parcel number: (If more than one parcel is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing all other parcels being withdrawn.) 8. The parties agree to the withdrawal of tax year(s) Signdture of Petitioner's Authorized Reprege A Petitioner: oF [> b | ~~ ~> Printed Name: Stephen Polter (P72591) Date: Nov 25, 2025 Signature of Respondent's authorized representative: Tina P. QAML ARN, Asse SSN Printed Name: Tina Papineau, Assessor Date: la/a/25
Page 3
EPT/N EXPRESS PROPERTY TAX APPEALS LLC A division of Polter Law Group 2600 W Big Beaver | Ste L100 Troy, MI 48084 US 0 B26 6 HE TT EEE en Le AR RU PU A EY BE TU ER UE
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 2D2M LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-002701 Township Of Hadley, Respondent. ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner was held in default on September 17, 2025, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE. By_________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: November 5, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 2D2M LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-002701 Township Of Hadley, Respondent. ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner was held in default on September 17, 2025, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE. By_________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: November 5, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 2D2M LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-002701 Township Of Hadley, Respondent. ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner was held in default on September 17, 2025, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE. By_________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: November 5, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED 0CT 02 2025 Ci Tranlnfo:ié06 26059981-1 10/01/25 Ely Chit: 1868 Aut: $75.00 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL — laa db STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR 2D2M LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-002701 Hadley Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER HOLDING PETITIONER IN DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that Petitioner filed a severed petition and a $125.00 filing fee in response to the Tribunal’s July 11, 2025, Order Severing Parcel No. 44-010-036-026-00 into the above-captioned docket (the order). The Tribunal erred in the entry of the order, however, because the correct filing fee, based on the Tribunal division and amount in contention, was $200.00." Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is held in DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the default: pay the remaining $75.00 owed for the petition filing fee. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of entry of this Order.2 Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via e-filing. Failure to comply with this order will result in Petitioner being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). ) bd 1] Entered: September 17, 2025 By a leew &. } la Fr bw/gc 1 See TTR 223(2)(a) and TTR 269(3)(a). 2A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an
Page 2
POLTER LAV GROTIP METROPLEX MI 480 2600 W. BIG BEAVER, SUITE L100 | TROY, MI 48084 26 SEP 2025 PM $4 L. U0 dum Ee BIRR Som - MTT Ford 20232 [ pasiWY MT L&§909 GEEONG-TF FREED Yi eb be pg]
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 2D2M LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-002701 Hadley Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER HOLDING PETITIONER IN DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that Petitioner filed a severed petition and a $125.00 filing fee in response to the Tribunal’s July 11, 2025, Order Severing Parcel No. 44-010-036-026-00 into the above-captioned docket (the order). The Tribunal erred in the entry of the order, however, because the correct filing fee, based on the Tribunal division and amount in contention, was $200.00.1 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is held in DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the default: pay the remaining $75.00 owed for the petition filing fee. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of entry of this Order.2 Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via e-filing. Failure to comply with this order will result in Petitioner being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). Entered: September 17, 2025 By _____________________________ bw/gc 1 See TTR 223(2)(a) and TTR 269(3)(a). 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002701 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 2D2M LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-002701 Hadley Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that an order was issued on July 11, 2025, severing parcel No. 44-010-036-026-00 from MTT Docket No. 25-002623 and holding Petitioner in default. Petitioner was required to file a severed petition and pay the required petition filing fee within 14 days of the entry of the order. On July 14, 2025, Petitioner submitted the required severed petition and indicated the petition filing fee had already been applied to MTT Docket No. 25-002623, which upon review, the Tribunal transferred the required filing fee to the instant appeal. As such, and inasmuch as the case is now properly pending in the Small Claims Division, and Petitioner has complied with the Tribunal’s rules of practice and procedure, the Tribunal finds good cause to set aside the default. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s default is SET ASIDE. Entered: August 6, 2025 By _____________________________ kac PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 2D2M LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-002701 Township Of Hadley, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal settlement conference process.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002701 Page 2 of 6 MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or email taxtrib@michigan.gov. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: August 1, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 2D2M LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-002701 Township Of Hadley, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be
Page 4
MTT
Page 5
STATE
Page 6
M
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
Check# 1346 amount $125.00 applied to docket 25-002701 ; RECEIVED JUN 02 2025 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name m.L Last Name/Company Name SXMLLC Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 6101 Deer Park Pass City or Town State ZIP Code Grand Blanc Mi 48439 Telephone Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name M.1. Last Name Stephen Polter Firm Name (if any) Polter Law Group - Express Property Tax Appeals Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2600 W Big Beaver, Ste L100 Troy Town Na zp © 18084 Telephone Number 5 18-21 3-6800 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) spolter@polterlaw.com Section 3: Subject Property Information How many If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? parcels are you Yes* [] No** appealing? *If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. **If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted. Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property's address]
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED JUL'17 2025 = = fi FAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL EXPRESS PROPERTY TAX APPEALS LLC A division of Polter Law Group July 14, 2025 SOM — MTT POB 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 Re: Multiple SC To whom it may concern, Herein enclosed please find five (“5”) filings/cases (three (3) otiginal, two (2) default cures), as follows: 1. SC appeal Przygoda v. Birmingham (following MBOR denial/1ejection), along with fee $125. 2. SC appeal Pecchia v. BH (following MBOR denial/tejection), along with fee $125. 3. Blumenthal v. Sfld. (following “ostensible” MBOR denial /tejection), along with fee $125. 4. Flint v. Anna Maria (24-002182) corrected figures, pursuant to Order of Default (enclosed). Cured. 5. SXM LLC, 2D2M LLC (25-002623/2701) cottected severed petition, pursuant to Order of Default (enclosed). Cured. Tribunal also appeats to require Petitioner to remit separate $125 payment for ostensible separate seveted petition/patcel; however, see enclosed proof of original payment(s) with original petition submission on ot about May 27, 2025. You'll notice that although I may have erroneously filed as multi contiguous patcel (now corrected), I did not merely remit $125 + $25 pursuant to MTT Rules, but rather in fee remittance I treated these as two sepatate submissions and in fact paid 2 x $125. Therefore, the Tribunal’s order including the fee requirement should be reconsidered and rendered moot, as the at least the fees were originally properly remitted. If, however, Tribunal is still unconvinced, I would appreciate it stating/noticing along with its basis therefor and allowing Petitioner an additional fourteen (“14”) days within which to cure/ remit same.
Page 2
I. RECEIVED JUL 172025 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR #2¢€ 00230 [PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name 2D2M LLC Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 6101 Deer Park Pass City or Town State ZIP Code Grand Blanc Mi 48439 Telephone Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Last Name Stephen Polter Amiens (=Mpoiter Law Group - EPTA Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2600 W Big Beaver, Ste L100 City or Town State Troy MI * "48084 Telephone Number 24821 36800 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) spolter@polterlaw.com Section 3: Subject Property Information How many If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? parcels are you Yes* [] No** appealing? *If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. 1 **|f no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted. Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property's address]
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply)
True Cash and Taxable Value
{1 Poverty Exemption
[J Taxable Value Only (calculation)
{1 bisabled Veterans Exemption
Uncapping of Taxable Value
[J
Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA)
[J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a
[O Classification
Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption}
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
See attached/enclosed and also already included inPage 4
STA
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
07/30/2025 Valuation Report 03:41 PM DB: Hadley Tup 2025 44-010-036-026-00 2025 Est. T.C.V. 2D2M LLC Property Class: 401 5864 BALDWIN RD Map #: HADLEY TOWNSHIP OXFORD, MI 48462 1995 ROLL - NEW 40 X 64 POLE BARN. GATE LOCKED, EST COMPLETE. 05/05 APPRAISED COMPLEX TO CALULATE AMOUNT OF HOMESTEAD FOR ADJUSTMENT AT JULY BOR. PH. Land Value Estimates for Land Table 00001.RES AC * Factors * Description Frontage Depth Front Depth Rate %Adj. Reason Value ACREAGE TABLE 'A' 40.000 Acres 6,688 100 267,500 40.0C Total Acres Total Est. Land Value = 267,500 Land Improvement Cost Estimates Description Rate Size % Good Cash Value D/W/P: 4in Concrete 7.26 4322 62 19,454 Pool: Gunite 63.70 800 42 21,403 Hot Tub 12,678.75 1 42 5,325 Ad-Hoc Unit-In-Place Items Description Rate Size % Good Cash Value 100 CAMPER SIRES 1.00 199400 100 199,400 TENNIS CT 106 X 114 1.00 66462 100 66,462 Total Estimated Land Improvements True Cash Value = 312,044 Cost Est. for Res. Bldg: 1 Single Family C Cls C 5 Blt 1969 (11) Heating System: Forced Hot Water Ground Area = 1667 SF Floor Arca = 1667 SF. Phy/Ab.Phy/Func/Econ/Comb. % Good=52/100/100/100/52 Building Areas Stories Exterior Foundation Size Cost New Depr. Cost 1 Story Siding Basement 1,412 1 Story Siding Slab 255 Total: 261,103 135,777 Other Additions/Adjustments Basement Living Area 1341 50,127 26,066 Exterior Brick Veneer 508 9,103 4,734 Basement, Outside Entrance, Below Grade 1 2,669 1,388 Plumbing 3 Fixture Bath 1 4,843 2,518 2 Fixture Bath 2 6,481 3,370 Separate Shower 2 2,835 1,474 Water/Sewer 2000 Gal Septic 1 10,078 5,241 Water Well, 200 Feet 1 11,200 5,824 Porches CCP (1 Story) 110 3,197 1,662 CSEP (1 Story) 700 27,678 14,393 Garages Class: C Exterior: Siding Foundation: 42 Inch (Unfinished) Base Cost 588 26,231 13, 640 Common Wall: 1 Wall 1 -2,800 -1,456 Built~Ins Dishwasher 1 812 422
Page 2
07/30/2025 Valuation Report 03:41 PM Hadley Twp 2025 Parcel Number: 44-010-036-026-00 Page: 2 Totals: 413,557 215,053 Notes: ECF (RES AC) 1.248 => TCV: 268, 386 Cost Est. for Res. Bldg: 2 Single Family CD Cls CD Blt O (11) Heating System: Wall/Floor Furnace Ground Area = 494 SF Floor Area = 494 SF. Phy/Ab.Phy/Func/Econ/Comb. % Good=52/100/100/100/52 Building Areas Stories Exterior Foundation Size Cost New Depr. Cost 1 Story Siding Slab 494 Total: 62,874 32,693 Other Additions/Adjustments Plumbing 3 Fixture Bath 3 12,072 6,277 Separate Shower 6 7,436 3,867 Water/Sewer 2000 Gal Septic 1 9,508 4,944 Water Well, 200 Feet 1 10,815 5,624 Totals: 102,705 53,405 Notes: ECF (RES AC) 1.248 => TCV: 66,649 Ag. Bld 1 0, 4 Wall Barn, General Purpose Class:D, Pole Quality:Low Cost Height: 13 ft Description Rate Size Cost New Base Cost 16.98 2560 43,469 Default Walls 5.68 2560 14,541 Phy/Ab.Phy/Func/Econ/Comb. % Good=44/100/100/100/44 Depr. Cost = 25,524 ECF (RES AC) 1.100 => TCV of Bldg: 1 = 28,077 Total Estimated True Cash Value of Agricultural Buildings = 28,077 2025 Est. T.C.V. 010-036-026-00 = 942, 656 Est. TCV/Total Floor Area = 436.21, Most recent sale 07/01/2023 for 330,000 2024 Assessed MBOR S5.E.V. Base for Cap C.P.I. 464,700 464,700 464,700 464,700 3.10 2025 New Eq. Adjustment Loss Additions Tax Adjustment Losses [+] 6,600 [¢] [+ 6,600 [¢) 2025 Assessed MBOR S.E.V. Capped ->Taxable<- PRE/MBT 471,300 471,300 471,300 478,105 471,300 [¢)
Page 3
BUILDING PLAN = 1 SPACE © ~g5T cop S 9 . . . . . . - . - . . . “On . = . NG I RA + fo EN EXE CER | 2y lo, Co nw Fa [NS a SEG 18.3 ETAL : A :: RE I sensed] TEM BASE = REPROD. i OEPR. N Somes | AREA RATE | VALUE [ ecres cosT conp SRY 010-036-026-00 5064 BALDWIN RD SKETCH
Page 4
sxxPP23URIENG JOU INQ STYRTISI PAWSIP UTSABY UOTIPUIOTUL xxx 2696 LLT ! 00521 001262 007021 ceo uebTUSTH ‘r93det 7 ; A ; Jo Ajunoyn ‘AeTpeH Jo dTyUsumo. :0J PeSusdTT 2927p ‘981 008’6€EY
Page 5
x
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-002701 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Township Of Hadley (LAPEER) First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Tina M.I. Last Name Papineau Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) P.O. Box 227 4293 Pratt Road City or Town Hadley State Michigan ZIP Code 48440-0227 Telephone Number 810-797-2117 Fax Number 810-797-6026 E-mail Address assessor@hadleytownship.org Section 3: Subject Property Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? No Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. N/A Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Appraisal to follow. The packet that the Petitioner submitted with the appeal was not received by the March Board of Review. The only item received was the letter from Polter Law Group dated March 5, 2025. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? March*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, cite the Board’s authority. Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, explain. Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? If so, what is the issue date? No IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 44-010-036-026-00 Classification of Property: Real Residential Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 471,300 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 471,300 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? $942,600 Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 471,300 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Attorney/Authorized
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 SXM LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 2D2M LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket Nos. 25-002623 & 25-002701 Hadley Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER SEVERING PARCEL NO 44-010-036-026-00 TO DOCKET NO 25-002701 ORDER HOLDING PETITIONER IN DEFAULT IN DOCKET NO 25-002701 The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that a petition was filed on May 27, 2025, initiating a valuation appeal for Parcel Nos. 44-010-036-032-00 and 44-010- 036-026-00. The petition indicates that the parcels are contiguous. The petition also includes attachments of the Board of Review decisions for both parcels. Those decisions indicate that each appealed parcel is owned by a different entity. The Tribunal finds that the parcels, while purportedly contiguous, cannot be filed in a single appeal because each party in interest, as Petitioner, is required to file a separate petition. Although the parties are commonly represented, each parcel has only one indicated party in interest eligible to file a petition as the property owner.1 “Party in interest” refers to a person or entity with a property interest in the property being assessed, and “property interest” is “a legal share in something and “all or part of a legal or equitable claim to or right in property.”2 Accordingly, the Tribunal shall sever Parcel No. 44-010-036-026-00 into a separate docket. A separate additional petition filing fee is due as a result of the severance.3 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Parcel No. 44-010-036-026-00 is SEVERED to Docket No. 25-002701. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is held in DEFAULT in Docket No. 25-002701. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall cure the default in Docket No. 1 See MCL 205.735a(6). 2 See Spartan Stores Inc v City of Grand Rapids, 307 Mich App 565, 575-576 and fn 9 (2014). 3 TTR 223(2). If not severed, the contiguous parcel would have been held in default for failure to pay the contiguous-parcel petition fee under TTR 223(2)(b).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002623 & 25-002701 Page 2 of 2 25-002701 by filing a severed petition and $125.00 petition filing fee within 14 days of the entry of this order.4 The petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal and, if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed on the assigned docket number as a “Severed Petition.” Failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of that case.5 Entered: July 11, 2025 By _____________________________ bw PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 4 See TTR 223(2)(a)(ii) and TTR 269(1). 5 See TTR 237(1).
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 SXM LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 2D2M LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket Nos. 25-002623 & 25-002701 Hadley Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER SEVERING PARCEL NO 44-010-036-026-00 TO DOCKET NO 25-002701 ORDER HOLDING PETITIONER IN DEFAULT IN DOCKET NO 25-002701 The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that a petition was filed on May 27, 2025, initiating a valuation appeal for Parcel Nos. 44-010-036-032-00 and 44-010- 036-026-00. The petition indicates that the parcels are contiguous. The petition also includes attachments of the Board of Review decisions for both parcels. Those decisions indicate that each appealed parcel is owned by a different entity. The Tribunal finds that the parcels, while purportedly contiguous, cannot be filed in a single appeal because each party in interest, as Petitioner, is required to file a separate petition. Although the parties are commonly represented, each parcel has only one indicated party in interest eligible to file a petition as the property owner.1 “Party in interest” refers to a person or entity with a property interest in the property being assessed, and “property interest” is “a legal share in something and “all or part of a legal or equitable claim to or right in property.”2 Accordingly, the Tribunal shall sever Parcel No. 44-010-036-026-00 into a separate docket. A separate additional petition filing fee is due as a result of the severance.3 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Parcel No. 44-010-036-026-00 is SEVERED to Docket No. 25-002701. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is held in DEFAULT in Docket No. 25-002701. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall cure the default in Docket No. 1 See MCL 205.735a(6). 2 See Spartan Stores Inc v City of Grand Rapids, 307 Mich App 565, 575-576 and fn 9 (2014). 3 TTR 223(2). If not severed, the contiguous parcel would have been held in default for failure to pay the contiguous-parcel petition fee under TTR 223(2)(b).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002623 & 25-002701 Page 2 of 2 25-002701 by filing a severed petition and $125.00 petition filing fee within 14 days of the entry of this order.4 The petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal and, if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed on the assigned docket number as a “Severed Petition.” Failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of that case.5 Entered: July 11, 2025 By _____________________________ bw PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 4 See TTR 223(2)(a)(ii) and TTR 269(1). 5 See TTR 237(1).
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.