Tabitha Kildani Petitioner V Township Of Plymouth Respondent

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 Tabitha Kildani,
 Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION
 v
 MTT Docket No. 26-003776
 Township Of Plymouth,
 Respondent.

 ORDER OF DEFAULT

 The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

 Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of
 action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment
 notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within
 14 days of the entry of this order.

 Therefore,

 IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated
 above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1

 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a
 motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

 Entered: October 14, 2026

 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service
 postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible
 postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by
 commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial
 service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the
 submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received.
 A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on
 that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m.
 on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a
 holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal
 act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760
 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-003776
Page 2 of 2

 PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the
parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing
or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized
representatives.

 By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 Tabitha Kildani,
 Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION
 v
 MTT Docket No. 26-003776
 Township Of Plymouth,
 Respondent.

 ORDER OF DEFAULT

 The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

 Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of
 action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment
 notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within
 14 days of the entry of this order.

 Therefore,

 IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated
 above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.2

 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a
 motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

 Entered: October 14, 2026

 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service
 postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible
 postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by
 commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial
 service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the
 submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received.
 A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on
 that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m.
 on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a
 holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal
 act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760
 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 26-003776
Page 2 of 2

 PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the
parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing
or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized
representatives.

 By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED

 AUG 05 2026
 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
 ! STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
 VALUATION / UNCAPPING

 Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other
 Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes.

 Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of
 Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in
 default.

 Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact information

 First Name ML Last Name/Company Name
 Tabitha Kildani

 Mailing Address {No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
 8975 N, Back Road

 City or Town State ZIP Code
 Plymouth Township Mi 48170
 Yalephone Number 313-522-0306

 Emall Address {do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email)
 tkildani@yahoo.om

 Section 2; Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact information
 First Name ML. Last Name

 Firm Name (if any)

 Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

 City or Town State ZIP Code

 Tetaphone Number

 Emali Address {do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email}

 Section 3: Subject Property Information *use the muttipls parcet form for additional, contiguous parcels.
 How many parcels are you If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjol:ing?
 appealing? [J Yes* A No

 **|f No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel

 Property Address (No., Street)
 8975 N Back Road
 City or Town County State Zip Code
 Plymouth Township Wayne Ml 48170

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply)

 True Cash and Taxable Value

 [J Taxable Value Only (calculation)

 [1 uncapping of Taxable Value

 Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
 { am appealing the assessment because | have comparables and other facts to support that the Township's true cash
 value and assessed/state equalized value exceeds the property's actual market value.
 The property is not a completely new residence. It is an older existing home that we added an addition to and
 remodaled. We retained all the original foundation and some of the original structure. See the attached supporting

 evigence.
 | currently have the previous 2 years pending opinion with evidence. The Plymouth Township assessor acknowledged
 at our previous MTT hearing that they agreed to give that house an effective age of 30 years older because of this.
 This confirms that the property should be valued as a remodeled and expanded older residence, not as a new
 construction. The valuation must account for the remaining original construction and effective age. Comparable marke!
 evidence does not support the true cash value. Nearby homes of similar size sold for much less. | have attached the
 comparables for your review.
 With the supporting comparables and the above provided information, { believe this supports a true cash value of
 $750,000-$800,000, with an assessed and slate equalized value of $375,000-$400,000.
 I respectfully request that the Tribunal review the comparables and other information | provided above. | have attached
 Sdtional pvidence to support this. The comparables do not support the Plymouth Townships cash value of

 Thank you for taking the time to review.

 Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
 Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (ROR)? Yes [Wm] No

 If Yes, chack which BOR you attended: March [Hl] July [a] December

 If No, please check the applicable reason(s):

 [3 Hot required to attend
 O Appealing a purported Clericai Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation i Seotion 5)

 [I] Appealing within 36 days of State Tax Commission Order
 [H] Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping
 1 other

 if you checked “other” above, explain:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 Section 7: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
 Parcottumber: 78.052-99-0018-000

 Classification of Property: Real Personal [J {check one}

 Agricultural J Commercial Industrial[J Residential @ Timber-Cutover(J Developmental(I Utitity[J (check one)

 Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Valua established by the Board of Review:
 by the Board of Review: $524,300 $524,300

 What do you balleve is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)?
 $750,000-$800,000
 What do you belleve is the assessed vajus? (multiply true cash What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed
 value by 6} $375 G00-$400,000 assessed value) $375,000-$400,000

 Fee Information
 Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for ail tax years at
 Issue?

 Hlves [ne

 If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees.

 if the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this pstition for all tax years at
 issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute. If you are appealing more than one
 parcel, the parce! with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $26.00
 will be added for each additional parce! being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00

 i your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and
 the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention

Page 4

9

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 Tabitha Kildani,
 Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION
 v
 MTT Docket No. 26-003776
 Township Of Plymouth,
 Respondent.

 NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

 TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket
 number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does
 not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies
 with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents
 submitted in this case.

 Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a
 copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our
 website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer
 form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the
 placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic
 copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the
 Tribunal’s website.

 By: Tribunal Clerk
 Entered: October 14, 2026

 PROOF OF SERVICE

 I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the
 parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing
 or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized
 representatives.

 By: Tribunal Clerk

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760
 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 Tabitha Kildani,
 Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION
 v
 MTT Docket No. 26-003776
 Township Of Plymouth,
 Respondent.

 NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

 TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket
 number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does
 not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies
 with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents
 submitted in this case.

 Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a
 copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our
 website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer
 form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the
 placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic
 copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the
 Tribunal’s website.

 By: Tribunal Clerk
 Entered: October 14, 2026

 PROOF OF SERVICE

 I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the
 parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing
 or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized
 representatives.

 By: Tribunal Clerk

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760
 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED

 AUG 05 2026
 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
 ! STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
 VALUATION / UNCAPPING

 Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other
 Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes.

 Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of
 Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in
 default.

 Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact information

 First Name ML Last Name/Company Name
 Tabitha Kildani

 Mailing Address {No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
 8975 N, Back Road

 City or Town State ZIP Code
 Plymouth Township Mi 48170
 Yalephone Number 313-522-0306

 Emall Address {do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email)
 tkildani@yahoo.om

 Section 2; Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact information
 First Name ML. Last Name

 Firm Name (if any)

 Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

 City or Town State ZIP Code

 Tetaphone Number

 Emali Address {do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email}

 Section 3: Subject Property Information *use the muttipls parcet form for additional, contiguous parcels.
 How many parcels are you If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjol:ing?
 appealing? [J Yes* A No

 **|f No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel

 Property Address (No., Street)
 8975 N Back Road
 City or Town County State Zip Code
 Plymouth Township Wayne Ml 48170

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply)

 True Cash and Taxable Value

 [J Taxable Value Only (calculation)

 [1 uncapping of Taxable Value

 Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
 { am appealing the assessment because | have comparables and other facts to support that the Township's true cash
 value and assessed/state equalized value exceeds the property's actual market value.
 The property is not a completely new residence. It is an older existing home that we added an addition to and
 remodaled. We retained all the original foundation and some of the original structure. See the attached supporting

 evigence.
 | currently have the previous 2 years pending opinion with evidence. The Plymouth Township assessor acknowledged
 at our previous MTT hearing that they agreed to give that house an effective age of 30 years older because of this.
 This confirms that the property should be valued as a remodeled and expanded older residence, not as a new
 construction. The valuation must account for the remaining original construction and effective age. Comparable marke!
 evidence does not support the true cash value. Nearby homes of similar size sold for much less. | have attached the
 comparables for your review.
 With the supporting comparables and the above provided information, { believe this supports a true cash value of
 $750,000-$800,000, with an assessed and slate equalized value of $375,000-$400,000.
 I respectfully request that the Tribunal review the comparables and other information | provided above. | have attached
 Sdtional pvidence to support this. The comparables do not support the Plymouth Townships cash value of

 Thank you for taking the time to review.

 Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
 Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (ROR)? Yes [Wm] No

 If Yes, chack which BOR you attended: March [Hl] July [a] December

 If No, please check the applicable reason(s):

 [3 Hot required to attend
 O Appealing a purported Clericai Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation i Seotion 5)

 [I] Appealing within 36 days of State Tax Commission Order
 [H] Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping
 1 other

 if you checked “other” above, explain:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 Section 7: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
 Parcottumber: 78.052-99-0018-000

 Classification of Property: Real Personal [J {check one}

 Agricultural J Commercial Industrial[J Residential @ Timber-Cutover(J Developmental(I Utitity[J (check one)

 Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Valua established by the Board of Review:
 by the Board of Review: $524,300 $524,300

 What do you balleve is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)?
 $750,000-$800,000
 What do you belleve is the assessed vajus? (multiply true cash What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed
 value by 6} $375 G00-$400,000 assessed value) $375,000-$400,000

 Fee Information
 Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for ail tax years at
 Issue?

 Hlves [ne

 If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees.

 if the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this pstition for all tax years at
 issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute. If you are appealing more than one
 parcel, the parce! with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $26.00
 will be added for each additional parce! being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00

 i your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and
 the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention

Page 4

9

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.