Record Finder / 25-002240-TT
Michigan

Rodney Thompson, Marie Thompson, Petitioners V Township Of Raber, Respondent

Petitioner
Rodney Thompson, Marie Thompson
Respondent
Township Of Raber

Case overview

Docket number
25-002240-TT
Status
Disposed
CaseType
SC Property
Division
Small Claims Division
County
Chippewa
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
17Order of DismissalNot recordedNot recorded09/02/2026Not recordedDownload
16Order Holding Party in DefaultNot recordedNot recorded08/12/2026Not recordedDownload
15Failed to Appear - PetitionerNot recordedNot recorded08/12/2026Not recordedNot recorded
14EvidenceRESPNot recorded07/17/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
13Notice of HearingNot recordedNot recorded06/17/2026Not recordedDownload
12A hearing has been scheduledNot recordedNot recorded06/17/2026Not recordedNot recorded
11Notice of FilingNot recordedNot recorded08/14/2025Not recordedDownload
10Proof of Service of Misc Documents was received.Not recordedNot recorded06/24/2025Not recordedDownload
9Attachments to the Answer were filedNot recordedNot recorded06/24/2025Not recordedDownload
8Answer was receivedNot recordedNot recorded06/24/2025Not recordedDownload
7Order of Partial DismissalNot recordedNot recorded06/16/2025Not recordedDownload
6Order Setting Aside P DefaultNot recordedNot recorded06/16/2025Not recordedDownload
5Response to Order - PetitionPETNot recorded06/09/2025Not recordedDownload
4Order of Default of PetitionerNot recordedNot recorded06/05/2025Not recordedDownload
3Petition has been verifiedPET106/05/2025Not recordedDownload
2Notice of Docket Number SCNot recordedNot recorded06/03/2025Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded04/28/2025$125.00Download

Documents

Order_of_Dismissal-FTA.2026-09-02_15-04-13.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Rodney Thompson,Marie Thompson, 

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

MTT Docket No.25-002240

Township Of Raber,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioner was placed in 

default on August 12, 2026, for failing to appear at a duly-scheduled hearing. Even 

though Petitioner failed to comply with the order, the Tribunal must consider Grimm v 

Dep’t of Treasury1 prior to the dismissal of this case. In Grimm, the Michigan Court of 

Appeals summarized factors that the Tribunal must consider before imposing the 

sanction of dismissal. Those factors are:

(1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of 

refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the 

opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) 

the degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) 

attempts to cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better 

serve the interests of justice.2 

Petitioner’s failure to appear at the hearing and failure to comply with the Order of 

Default has established a history of deliberate delay. As a result, giving careful 

consideration to the factors involved and considering all options in determining what 

sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser 

sanction would not be appropriate. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

This order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case.

1 Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).

2 Id. at 149.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002240

Page 2 of 2

APPEAL RIGHTS

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless 

the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a 

principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the 

decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, 

if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the 

opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to 

electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the 

motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral 

arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal.

Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the 

claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If 

the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal 

by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the 

record on appeal. There is no certification fee. 

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

Entered: September 2, 2026

PROOF OF

Page 3

STA

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Order_of_Default_-_FTA.2026-08-12_16-19-55.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Rodney Thompson,Marie Thompson,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

MTT Docket No. 25-002240

Township Of Raber,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioner failed to 

appear for the duly-noticed hearing scheduled for August 12, 2026. Thus, this case is 

subject to dismissal or a default hearing. Prior to dismissal or the scheduling of a 

default hearing, however, the Tribunal finds that placing the absent party in default and 

ordering an explanation and documentation justifying the absence at the proceeding is 

appropriate.1 Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the absent party is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall submit information and 

documentation as directed above. The response must be filed with the Tribunal and 

served on the opposing party or the opposing party’s authorized representative within 

14 days of entry of this order.2 

Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this case or the scheduling of 

a default hearing, as provided by TTR 237.

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

Entered: August 12, 2026

1 See Grimm v Department of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).

2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002240 

Page 2 of 2

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Rodney Thompson,Marie Thompson,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

MTT Docket No. 25-002240

Township Of Raber,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioner failed to 

appear for the duly-noticed hearing scheduled for August 12, 2026. Thus, this case is 

subject to dismissal or a default hearing. Prior to dismissal or the scheduling of a 

default hearing, however, the Tribunal finds that placing the absent party in

Page 4

MTT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Thompson Proof of Service & Review-combined.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Rodney Thompson, Marie Thompson 

Petitioner(s) 

Y 

MTT Docket No, 25-002240 

Township of Raber 

, 

Respondent(s) 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Ll 

states that on 7-17-2026 

No/ahe 

[Name of person serving/mailing petition] 

[date of service] 

served a copy of the Additional respondentanswer 

relative to the above-captioned matter upon: 

[Provide name and address of the party/people being served] 

010-158-006-00 

Rodney & Marie Thompson 

25425 S Raber Rd 

Goetzville MI 49736 

ze 277 ford 

[Signature”of person who is serving/mailing copy] 

Tina M Fuller 

[Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy] 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

- 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 

- 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 

- Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Page 2

Parcel # 010-158-006-00 

Tribunal Case# 25-002240 

Rodney Thompson 

25425 S Raber Rd., Goetzville MI 49736 

The property has been listed for sale as of 03-09-2026 for $299,000. 

The property has mixed uses with a commercial (convenience store) and a residential 

home located the parcel. A land division application has not been submitted to the 

township, and itis assumed the owner-occupied residential home will be included in the 

sale. Property maintenance would be a major factor in determining 

the Market Value of the 

property/ business. 

The sales listings include properties sold “as is” as well as active businesses. The attached 

review of unadjusted sales and listings of active and closed mixed-use commercial 

properties sold during 2023 - 2026 indicates a value for 2025 of $166,500 and a value for 

2026 of $122,400. 

[ Year 

Current 

Requested 

Current Taxable 

| Requested 

Assessed 

Assessed 

Taxable 

2025 

149,000 

83,200 

74,489 

74,489 

[2026 

63,500 

61,200 

63,500 

61,200

Page 3

9Iv'zeT 

6T°0L 

103(anS Jo anjeA 19x1e 

ly parewns3 

ubs 12d 1500 uepaw 

%9S 

20ud ajes pue 301d Suns usamiaq asuasay 

uelpaw 

SS3UISNQ 9ANOER 

SoA] 

13WwWo9 /sa1 asn paxiw|[y6°z. 

[4244 

000002 

%29 

000'52€ 

920Z/Z1/T 

PY Jaqey S 9288 | 

Paso)d 

ou’ 

$81 /1e12J3WW02 (020 

96LT 

£68'V6T 

000°6v€ 

dunsn 

IW 3sIp2ied EZT-W vEZ8)| 

SSaUISNq 9ANIR 

ou 

30ua1U3AU0D /SET 1e1IaWLI0| 89°69 

996¢ 

89E°9/2 

000°S6Y 

Bunsn| 

pueis| Jens 1g a10USISaM S S102 

$SaUISNQ aoe 

Sak] 

Jawwod /s31 3sn paxiw| 0g 6 

LSOY 

000002 

%0S 

00066 

Seoeiy 

IW ANIAZI09 8Y-W LT08T 

SUAWWOY 

21qe)IBAY 3SUBJTN0OND 

Kuadoid jo adiy 

Buiping joy bs iad asud | 130s suiplng 

(paysnipe | 

Bugsy 

| soudsunsn 

PI0s 

Kuadoid 

r 

1epBwwWoy | sdupsn) 

| saajes 

I 

4 

ej) 

aaudaies 

|aduaseyp 

% 

9202 1eak xe1 10) sBunsi) pue sajes ajqesedwios paisnipeun 

825'99T 

103(ang Jo anjeA 1931eW patewns3 

67°66 

ubs 19d 1509 ueipaw 

%98 

20ud aes pue 30d Bunsi; uIMIAQ 3IUBIAIP URIPAL 

.UONIPUOI SI SB, SIKG Paso) 

sak 

JaWWOI 51 3sn paxil py vy 

004C 

000'0¢T 

 [%08 

000°05T 

VZOZ/TL/6 | 

IW 93RIIA NOLS] VET-IW 3 GETET 

Paso 

ou; 

S31 /1e1I3WW0d [TS '60T 

95/2 

808°T0€E 

000°6vE 

dunsi 

IW 3SIPeIed £21-W vEC8| 

$59UISNQ OANE 

Ou| 

90UBIUAAUOD /SeT /1eIDIBUIWI0D[€6'Z0T 

996€ 

990°82Y 

000°G6y 

dunsi| 

puers| 1e8ng 10 a10USISOM S S107] 

LuonIpuod si se, s1eak Auew paso)o| 

ou 

$91 /1e12J3WW0I 6°66 

ovvL 

00S'2ET 

%98 

000°65T 

£202/62/9 

IW 3SIpeled EZT-W N 6718, 

559UISNq AANIE| 

SoA] 

se/aouaiuaAu0d AuBINEISaY [2528 

0902 

000'0.T 

— 

[%b6 

006'6/T 

£202/V1/E 

IW 3sIpeled £2T-W IST 

SUBWWoY 

@1qe)IeAY asuadiTnonby 

Auadoid jo ody 

Buipng joy bs iad aoud | (sds Bung | (parsnipe 

Bunsn | eapdBupsn 

pros 

Ruadoid 

1eswwo) | sfunsn) 

sa ages 

e101 

@oudales 

|asuaseyp 

% 

S202 1eaA Xe) 10) 

SFIS) 

put sales ajgesedwios pasnipeun 

1e1218WW0/5aY

Page 4

9S

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 25-002240

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? Yes

Party Filing Document 

Respondent

Files

Document Type: Attachments to Answer

Attachment File Name: Thompson Proof of Service & Review-combined

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC_Notice_of_Telephonic_Hearing.2026-06-17_10-22-46.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Rodney Thompson,Marie Thompson,

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

MTT Docket No.: 25-002240

Township Of Raber, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF TELEPHONE HEARING

The Tribunal has scheduled a telephone hearing to be conducted as follows. Hearings are 

generally 30 minutes in length. 

HEARING DATE:

August 12, 2026 

HEARING TIME:

4:00 PM Eastern Time

JOIN BY PHONE:

1-248-509-0316

ACCESS CODE:

731891219 

 

This hearing will be held by telephone conference call with the Judge as the host. In order to join 

the hearing, call the phone number listed above at least 5 minutes prior to the hearing time. You 

will then be required to input the access code, followed by # to connect. The Tribunal judge will call 

in and join by phone at the hearing time. Failure to timely call in may result in the placement of a 

party or parties in default.

This is an important legal document. Please have someone translate the document.

Este es un documento legal importante. Por favor, haga traducir este documento.

এটি একটি গুরুত্বপূর্ণ আইনি দলিল, অনুগ্রহ করে কেউ দলিলটিকে অনুবাদ করুন।

.ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺛﻴﻘﺔ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻴﺔ ﻫﺎﻣﺔ ﻳﺮﺟﻰ ﻟﺪﻳﻚ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺗﺘﺮﺟﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﻴﻘﺔ

Ito ay isang mahalagang legal na dokumento. Mangyari lamang na magkaroon ng isang tao isalin ang 

dokumento.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002240

Page 2 of 4

HEARING INFORMATION – PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY

GENERAL INFORMATION: An impartial hearing will be conducted in accordance with the Michigan Tax 

Tribunal Rules (R 792.10201-R 792.10297) and the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act, MCL 24.201 et 

seq. The Michigan Rules of Evidence and the Michigan Court Rules may be applicable. Parties are expected 

to exercise proper respect and courtesy toward other parties, witnesses, and administrative law judges, which 

includes attending the hearing on time, silencing cell phones, and choosing a quiet, private location to 

participate in the hearing to limit distractions and ensure minimal background noise. The hearing may be 

recorded for notetaking purposes, but the recording is not a formal record, unless otherwise provided for by the 

Tribunal.

REPRESENTATION: You may have an attorney or anyone else of your choice represent you at the hearing. 

The Tribunal does not recommend or appoint representatives for you and will not pay for your representative.

WITNESSES: You may have anyone join you at the hearing to speak in support of your case. However, the 

time to present your case is limited and additional time may not be provided to accommodate witness 

testimony.

DOCUMENTATION: Parties are required to submit all documents in support of their contentions to both the 

Tribunal and the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents were 

previously submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the 

documents are not timely submitted to both the Tribunal and the opposing party, the documents may be 

excluded. Documents may be submitted to the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s electronic filing (e-

filing) system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to 

submission by e-mail. If sent by mail, the documents must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized 

representative at the address identified in the petition or answer for that party or authorized representative, 

unless the party or authorized representative filed an appearance or other documentation

Page 3

MT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC-Notice_of_Filing_of_Answer.2025-08-14_16-05-57.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Rodney Thompson,Marie Thompson,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-002240

Township Of Raber,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an 

appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan 

Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan 

Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal 

settlement conference process.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002240

Page 2 of 8

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or 

email taxtrib@michigan.gov.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: August 14, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN,

Page 4

MTT

Page 5

S

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

25-002240 Raber POS.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 

|. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Rodney Thompson, Marie Thompson 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-002240 

Township of Raber 

, 

Respondent(s) 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Tina Fuller 

states that on 6-24-2025 

he/she 

[Name of person serving/mailing petition] 

[date of service] 

served a copy of the Respondents Answer 

relative to the above-captioned matter upon: 

[Provide name and address of the party/people being served] 

17-010-158-006-00 

Rodney & Marie Thompson 

25425 S Raber Rd 

Goetzville MI 49736 

2 

ZL 

[Signature of person who is serving/maiing copy] 

ta m Feveon 

[Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy] 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

- 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 

- 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 

- Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

25-002240 Raber Answer.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

s f 

ec 10n . . 

1 R 

First Name 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

MTT DOCKET NO. 25-002240 

------------

espon en s on ac n orma 10n 

d 

t' C 

t 

t I f 

f 

I

M.I. I Last Name 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

I 

State I

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

s f 

ec 1on . espon en s 

orney1 u or1ze 

epresen a 1ve s on ac n orma 10 

. 

2 R 

d 

t' Att 

/A th 

dR 

t f 

' C 

t 

ti f 

f n

First Name 

Tina 

Firm Name (if any) 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

17165 S Deer Run Rd 

City or Town 

Kinross

Telephone Number 906_360_9055 

lrt 

I 

Last Name 

Fuller 

I 

State 

Ml 

I 

ZIP Code 

49752 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

Rabertwpassessor@gmail.com 

Section 3: Subiect Prooertv Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

lt!il Yes D No 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. 

D Yes D No 

I Not Applicable

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

The assessed and taxable valuations in contention were computed in conformity with the 

requirements of MCL 211.27a and Article IX, Section 3 of the Michigan Constitution of 

1963. 

The Assessed Valuations, as equalized, does not exceed 50% of true cash value of the 

subject property. 

There exists no genuine issue of material fact such that Respondent is entitled to 

judgment as a matter of law. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

Yes 

[No 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

March 

Oa July 

Oa December 

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? O Yes 

Od No 

*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [mm] Yes 

[| No 

If yes, cite the Board's authority. 

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? O Yes 

No 

If yes, explain 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

O Yes 

No 

If so, what is the issue date? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE 

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? 

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at 

a BOR? O Yes 

No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: Od March 

O July 

[| December 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS 

Did Petitioner request the exemption at 

a BOR? O 

Yes 

No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: O March 

[] July 

O December 

Tax Year(s) denied: 

List the date the exemption was denied: 

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY 

What do you believe the

Page 4

Mi

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

05._Property_Tax_Appeal_Answer_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.872ced89-d834-4690-94ae-9ff2331ed486.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-002240

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Township Of Raber (CHIPPEWA)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Tina

M.I.

Marie

Last Name

Fuller

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

17165 South Deer Run Rd

City or Town

Kinross

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

49752

Telephone Number

906-360-9055

Fax Number

E-mail Address

Rabertwpassessor@gmail.com

Section 3: Subject Property Information

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

Yes

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another.

N/A 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this 

document, you may be held in default.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

The assessed and taxable valuations in contention were computed in conformity with the requirements of MCL 211.27a and Article IX, Section 3 of the Michigan 

Constitution of 1963. 

The Assessed Valuations, as equalized, does not exceed 50% of true cash value of the subject property.

There exists no genuine issue of material fact such that Respondent is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? March*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

If yes, cite the Board’s authority.

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No

If yes, explain.

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

If so, what is the issue date?

MI

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued?

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? No

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption:

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS

Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? 

No

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended:

Tax Year(s) denied:

List the date the exemption was denied:

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Real

Commercial

Section 6: Valuation Information

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Partial_Dismissal_-_Valuation.2025-06-16_11-58-25.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Rodney Thompson,Marie Thompson,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002240

Township Of Raber,

Respondent.

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

is appealing assessments for prior tax years and the Tribunal has no authority over 

those assessments under MCL 205.735a, as the petition was not timely filed.1 Further, 

the Tribunal also has no authority over those assessments, as the facts alleged do not 

establish that the assessments were the result of a clerical error (i.e., “an error of a 

transpositional, typographical, or mathematical nature”) or a mutual mistake of fact (i.e., 

“an erroneous belief, which is shared and relied on by both parties”).2 Rather, the facts 

alleged indicate a valuation dispute that does not involve the correction of a clerical 

error or mutual mistake of fact. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s assessment appeal is PARTIALLY DISMISSED. The 

appeal shall continue for the 2025 tax year(s) only.

By:___________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: June 16, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

1 See Electronic Data Systems Corporation v Township of Flint, 253 Mich App 538 (2002). 

2 See International Place Apartments – IV v Ypsilanti Township, 216 Mich App 104, 109 (1996), Ford 

Motor Company v City of Woodhaven, 475 Mich 425, 442 (2006).

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Rodney Thompson,Marie Thompson,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002240

Township Of Raber,

Respondent.

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

is appealing assessments for prior tax years and the Tribunal has no authority over 

those assessments under MCL 205.735a, as the petition was not timely filed.3 Further, 

the Tribunal also has no authority over those assessments, as the facts alleged do not 

establish that the assessments were the result of a clerical error (i.e., “an error of a 

transpositional, typographical, or mathematical nature”) or a mutual mistake of fact (i.e., 

“an erroneous belief, which is shared and relied on by both parties”).4 Rather, the facts 

alleged indicate a valuation dispute that does not involve the correction of a clerical 

error or mutual mistake of fact. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s assessment appeal is PARTIALLY DISMISSED. The 

appeal shall continue for the 2025 tax year(s) only.

By:___________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: June 16, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those

Page 3

STATE OF

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Order_Setting_Aside_P_Default.2025-06-16_11-55-44.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Rodney Thompson,Marie Thompson, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002240

Township Of Raber,

Respondent.

ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

was held in default on June 05, 2025, and the default has been timely cured. The 

documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on 

the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and 

clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE.

By_________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: June 16, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Rodney Thompson,Marie Thompson, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002240

Township Of Raber,

Respondent.

ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

was held in default on June 05, 2025, and the default has been timely cured. The 

documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on 

the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and 

clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE.

By_________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: June 16, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Rodney Thompson,Marie Thompson, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002240

Township Of Raber,

Respondent.

ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

was held in default on June 05, 2025, and the default has been timely cured. The 

documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on 

the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and 

clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE.

By_________________________________

Patricia L. Halm,

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

LLY 

RECEIVED 

$9 

JUN 13 2025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICIIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principat Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant 

to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a capy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information 

First Name 

a= 

MJ. 

Last 

Mame/Company Name 

oka 

so), 

FA oon Opn 

ailing Address(Nd., 

Street, P.6. 

Béx or Rurai&o ute) 

7 

A528 

S$ 

Labee £2 Fa 

T= ilo Me 

City of Town 

PEE 

v 

State 

| ZIP Cade 

ny 

(ro e7z of fle 

. 

SE 

ephone 

Number 

, 

Dol =P 77200 

E-mail Address (do not entef unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

LH 0 BLO EF TT ACT 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact information 

1 

First Nama 

[LEN 

Last Name 

Firm Name {if any) 

Wailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route} 

City or Town 

State 

Zip Code 

Telephone Numher 

Email Adtiress (do not enter uniess you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

if you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

parceisare you | [1 ypg* 

71 Not 

appealing? 

Mf yes, use a multiple parce! form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. 

/ 

*{f no, you must file separate appeals for each now-contiguous or non-adjoining pareet or you wilt be defaulted, 

Property Addrass (No., Street, City, $7, ZIP) 

[If multiple, fist first property’s address} 

ASS 

S Mthew LU GoTo Mo) #927 

Taxing Authofity {City or Township) 

County

Page 2

STATE OF MICIHGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed chao ail tat appiyy 

[# True Cash and Taxable Value 

[3 Poverty Exemption 

JB Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

1 Disabled Veterans Exemption 

A Uncapping of Taxable Value 

[1 Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

|] Exemption from Taxation {other than the denial of a 

Tl Classification 

Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

See 

AT 

hed 

7 SHG e 

LETT sre 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Year(s) you are appealing: 

LofF- 2025 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? pri} Yes 

[I] No 

if Yes, check whlch BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision; a] March 

[ma] July 

O December 

if No, check the applicable reason(s): 

Not required to attend 

|=} Assessment Change Nolice was not received by Petitioner 

[| Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutua! Misiake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Saction 8) 

Appealing within 35 days of Stale Tax Commission Order 

Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notita of Uncapping

Page 3

STATE OF MICINGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON L. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information wuss ie mutipts parcel form for additional, contiguous parests. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

SD =n SoS 

00d 

~ 60 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial industrial 

Residential 

Tipber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

{check one} 

75 Alm 

57901 

0 

0 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by

Page 4

STAT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC_Order_of_Default_of_Petition.2025-06-05_11-02-20.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Rodney Thompson,Marie Thompson,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002240

Township Of Raber,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner failed to complete section(s) 7 of petition. See TTR 279. As such, the petition 

is not properly pending. Petitioner must complete the petition by providing all 

information required by each applicable section and return the completed petition within 

14 days of the entry of this Order. The petition shall note the docket number assigned 

by the Tribunal and if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed on the 

assigned docket number as an “Amended Petition.” Small Claims petition forms can be 

found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this Order.i 

Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: June 5, 2025

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002240

Page 2 of 6

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Rodney Thompson,Marie Thompson,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002240

Township Of Raber,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner failed to complete section(s) 7 of petition. See TTR 279. As such, the petition 

is not properly pending. Petitioner must complete the petition by providing all 

information required by each

Page 4

MTT

Page 5

S

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

RECEIVED 

MAY 02 2025 

X 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First Name 

M.I 

Last Name/Company Name 

Foes vp + PPI 

7 » 250n 

Thoin O5on 

“Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

7 

5905S Lobes AF Coole 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Soe72 ple 

mi’ | ¥7)3¢ 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

Pol 

- 720-77 a0 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

RE Eg 2 

BP HIT a ped 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

] 

First Name 

M.I 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

parcels areyou | [7] yes* 

No** 

appealing? 

*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.

Page 2

hegre 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply) 

| True Cash and Taxable Value 

[J Poverty Exemption 

y Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[J Disabled Veterans Exemption 

[] Uncapping of Taxable Value 

[OJ Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

[J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a 

[§ Classification 

Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

200 cltocked 

3 peg 

Lett 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Year(s) you are appealing: 

Lo/F ~ 2025 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

Yes 

[mm] No 

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [7] March 

[J uly 

[J December 

If No, check the applicable reason(s): 

Not required to attend 

O Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner 

0 Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) 

O Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 

O Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping

Page 3

& 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

/2-0lo~/s}- 60L~ 9° 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

[m] 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Resta 

@n T 

ber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

£0) 

OJ 

0 

Uv41% 0 

7] 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

19,44 

0° 

Current Taxable Value as established by the 

BOR: 

7 

sui 

pound 

FGooo 

LAM No] SUEEC 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of

Page 4

STATE

Page 5

We

Page 6

©

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2025-06-03_09-56-12.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Rodney Thompson,Marie Thompson,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-002240

Township Of Raber,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: June 3, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Rodney Thompson,Marie Thompson,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-002240

Township Of Raber,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: June 3, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

RECEIVED 

MAY 02 2025 

X 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First Name 

M.I 

Last Name/Company Name 

Foes vp + PPI 

7 » 250n 

Thoin O5on 

“Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

7 

5905S Lobes AF Coole 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Soe72 ple 

mi’ | ¥7)3¢ 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

Pol 

- 720-77 a0 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

RE Eg 2 

BP HIT a ped 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

] 

First Name 

M.I 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

parcels areyou | [7] yes* 

No** 

appealing? 

*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.

Page 2

hegre 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply) 

| True Cash and Taxable Value 

[J Poverty Exemption 

y Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[J Disabled Veterans Exemption 

[] Uncapping of Taxable Value 

[OJ Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

[J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a 

[§ Classification 

Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

200 cltocked 

3 peg 

Lett 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Year(s) you are appealing: 

Lo/F ~ 2025 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

Yes 

[mm] No 

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [7] March 

[J uly 

[J December 

If No, check the applicable reason(s): 

Not required to attend 

O Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner 

0 Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) 

O Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 

O Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping

Page 3

& 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

/2-0lo~/s}- 60L~ 9° 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

[m] 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Resta 

@n T 

ber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

£0) 

OJ 

0 

Uv41% 0 

7] 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

19,44 

0° 

Current Taxable Value as established by the 

BOR: 

7 

sui 

pound 

FGooo 

LAM No] SUEEC 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of

Page 4

STATE

Page 5

We

Page 6

©

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.