Record Finder / 26-003724-TT
Michigan

Richard H Betz Petitioner V City Of Romulus Respondent

Petitioner
Richard H Betz
Respondent
City Of Romulus

Case overview

Docket number
26-003724-TT
Status
Default Petitioner
CaseType
SC Property
Division
Small Claims Division
County
Wayne
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
5Answer was receivedRESPNot recorded09/30/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
4Order of Default of PetitionerNot recordedNot recorded09/30/2026Not recordedDownload
3Petition has been verifiedPET109/30/2026Not recordedDownload
2Notice of Docket Number SCNot recordedNot recorded09/30/2026Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded07/30/2026$0.00Download

Documents

Recorded Deed 5.21.25.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

2025174513 L: 59562 P: 1123 DD
 05/21/2025 02:14:18 PM Total Pages: 2
 Bernard J. Youngblood, Register of Deeds - Wayne County, Mi
 ELECTRONICALLY RECORDED

 MICHIGAN REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX
 Wayne County County Tax Stamp #728205
 05/21/2025
 Receipt# 25-165484 L: 59562 P: 1123
 State Tax: $1,762.50 County Tax: $258.50

 WARRANTY DEED
 H590 TUTAA
 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Jonathan C. Golliher
 whose address is 37116 Goddard Rd. Romulus, MI 48174
 Convey(s) and Warrant(s) to Richard Betz
 whose address is 8815 Spinnaker Way Apt. C3, Ypsilanti, MI 48197
 the following described premises situated in the City of Romulus, County of Wayne, and State of
 Michigan to-wit:

 The Southerly (Southwest) 5 feet of Lot 4, all of Lot 5, all of Lot 6, and the Northerly
 (Northeast) 15 feet of Lot 7, of PORTER'S SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Liber 51 of Plats,
 page 30, Wayne County Records.

 Commonly known as: 37116 Goddard Rd., Romulus, MI 48174
 Tax Parcel # 82-80-078-12-0004-002

 for the consideration of: Two Hundred Thirty Five Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($235,000.00)

 subject to easement, use, building, and other restrictions of record, if any.

 Dated: May) , 2025

 Signed and Sealed: _—

 Vs oT
 Jomathan’€. Golliher

This is to certify that there are no delinquent property taxes owed to our office on
this property for five years prior to the date of this instrument. No representation
 is made as to the status of any tax liens or titles owed to any other entities.
 Receipt: 255418762 Date: 5/21/2025 By: MJW (1)

 Eric R. Sabree, Wayne County Treasurer, Detroit, Michigan

Page 2

2025174513 Page 2 of 2

 (Warranty Deed (page 2) dated: MayZ]
 between Jonathan C. Golliher, Seller(s) and Richard Betz, Purchaser(s).)

 STATE OF MICHIGAN

 county oF WSR

 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on May 2 2025, by Jonathan C
 Golliher.

 Ii!

 Notary Signature:
 Notary Name Printed: 7s,
 Z,2,
 Notary County, Michigan 2,
 EX
 Acting in County
 My commission expires

 jashtenaw
 es: Eon
 To
 File No. 459072TAA
 Drafted by: Return to:
 William F. Ager, III P.33742 Richard Betz
 2750 S. State Street, Ste 1 37116 Goddard Rd.
 Ann Arbor MI 48104 Romulus, MI 48174

 County Treasurer's Certificate City Treasurer's Certificate

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

scanswer_valuation.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM
 VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL

 MTT DOCKET NO. 26-003724

 Respondent’s Contact Information:
 Filer Type: Local Unit of Government:
 Local Unit of Government City Of Romulus (WAYNE)

 First Name M.I. Last Name

 Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

 City or Town State ZIP Code

 Telephone Number

 E-mail Address

 Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any:
 First Name M.I. Last Name
 Jennifer Stamper

 Firm Name (if any)
 City of Romulus

 Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
 11111 Wayne

 City or Town State ZIP Code
 Romulus Michigan 48174

 Telephone Number
 7349427520

 E-mail Address
 jstamper@romulusgov.com

 Subject Property Information:
 Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings.
 *If necessary, attach a separate sheet.
 N/A

 Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more?
 Yes

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal:
 Property was purchased by petitioner on May 21, 2025. Property was properly uncapped.

 Jurisdictional Issues:

 IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES:

 Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review?
 Yes

 If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended:
 March

 If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review?

 *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.

 If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority?

 If yes, please cite the Board’s authority?

 Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact?
 No

 If yes, please explain

 Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order?
 No

 If yes, when was it issued?

 IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE:

 When was the Notice of Uncapping issued?
 2026-02-25

 Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped?
 211.24c

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 Valuation Information:
 Parcel Identification Number:
 80 078 12 0004 002

 Classification of Property: Real (check one)

 Residential (check one)

 Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review:
 112100

 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:
 112100

 What do you believe is the fair market value?
 224200

 What do you believe is the taxable value?

 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature
 Respondent’s Signature:

 /s/ Jennifer Stamper
 Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature:

 /s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC_Order_of_Default_of_Petition.2026-09-30_09-27-17.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 Richard H Betz,
 Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION
 v
 MTT Docket No. 26-003724
 City Of Romulus,
 Respondent.

 ORDER OF DEFAULT

 The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

 Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of
 action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment
 notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within
 14 days of the entry of this order.

 Therefore,

 IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated
 above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1

 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a
 motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

 Entered: September 30, 2026

 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service
 postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible
 postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by
 commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial
 service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the
 submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received.
 A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on
 that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m.
 on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a
 holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal
 act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760
 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-003724
Page 2 of 4

 PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the
parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing
or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized
representatives.

 By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

Richard H Betz
37116 Goddard Rd
Romulus , MI 48174

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 Richard H Betz,
 Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION
 v
 MTT Docket No. 26-003724
 City Of Romulus,
 Respondent.

 ORDER OF DEFAULT

 The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

 Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of
 action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment
 notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within
 14 days of the entry of this order.

 Therefore,

 IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated
 above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.2

 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a
 motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

 Entered: September 30, 2026

 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service
 postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible
 postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by
 commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial
 service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the
 submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received.
 A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on
 that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m.
 on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a
 holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal
 act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760
 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Page 5

MTT Docket No. 26-003724
Page 2 of 2

 PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the
parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing
or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized
representatives.

 By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

HT
 > RECEIVED

 AUG 4 2026

 STATE OF MICHIGAN RUCHEGAR: TAX TRIBUNAL
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR : LANSING DIRECTOR

 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
 VALUATION / UNCAPPING

 Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricuftural Exemption, Other
 , Special Assessments, or Nonr-Propertytax disputes.

 Pursuantto Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 278, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (1.e., Board of
 Review Daolsion or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in
 default,
 Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information i
A VA ri
 TTuE Goodland. RAK Fparin
 I «PP %2 zz 55/7%

 Emalt Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to sand stl correspondence via small)

 Section 2: Petitioner's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
 First Namo "XN Last Name
 7 E
 Firm Name (if any)

 Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Routa)

 City or Town State ZIP Code

 Telaphone Number

 Email Address (do nof enter nies you want HTT 0 send all correspondence via emai)

 Section 3: Subject Property Information usethe muttipis parost form for additionay, contiguous parcels.
 How many parcels are you Hyouare ‘more thar one parcel, ure they contiguous or adjoining?
 appealing? Cl vert No*

 A 4 **if No, you must file separate appeals for sach parcel

 Property Address (No., Strect)
 FT TLE Nr LIA ZL
 City or Town State 24P Coda
 FE poor fr NCR Ye Zz | 5E07Y

Page 2

AFT

 STATE OF MICHIGAN AR BROWN. DP
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTME F SING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LON 1. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR ARTMENT OF LICEN ING ANE DIRECTOR

 Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (oheokaii that apply)

 {J True Cash and Taxable Value

 [J Taxable Value Only (calculation)

 “52 Uncapping of Taxable Value

 Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
 Soe acon pam ed mdditorral
 Ferrel! ection 5, Lrple) A24577 Lop
 “ir apgred /.

 Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
 Did you protest the assessment ata Board of Review (BOR)? Jd Yea [a

 It Yes, check which BOR you attended: [3 March [J duty [J December

 If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Vz

 3 not requiredto attana
 [1 Appealing a purpostad Crersoat Emor or Mutust Mistake of Fact ( yes, inckade explanation in Section 5)
 [1] Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order
 = Appesting within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping
 Other

 i you chaoked “ “above, explain:
 AYA

Page 3

SLT

 STATR OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 Section 7: Valuation Information susethe multiple parce! form for additions, contiguous pares.
 Parcel Number:
 FR EC 078 IR o0o0Y JOA.
 Classificationof Property: Rest] PersonalIJ (check one)

 Agricutturai[1 Commercial] (ndustriat Residential ff Timber-Cutover[1 Developmental[1 Utility(J (check one)
 Assassad Value (also known as State Equalized Vatus) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review:
 by the Board of Review: yore /72 [1229

 What do you belleve Is the far ariet valuo {also known es true cash value)? ‘
 L427 [0p
 What do you betieve Is the assessed value? (multiply rue cash What do you believe ts the taxable valus? (cannot exceed
 value by 5) //A 2005 assessedvaioe) //L J)

 Fee Information
 Does the property have a Principal Residents Exemptionof atleast 50% as of the date of the Fling of this petition for all tax years at
 Issue?

 [Betves [no

 ifyou answered yes to the above question, you are pot required to pay any filing facs.

 if the property does not hinve a Principat Residence Exevption of at laast 50% as of the date of the fling of this petition for all tax years at
 Issue,the filing fee is based on the greater of the Stats EqualizedValuo or Taxable Value in dispute. If you are appealingmore than one
 parcel, the parce! with the highest State Equalized Value or Tmemble Value fe dispute wilt be ised to determine your filing foe, plus $25.60
 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total fillng fee of $1,000,00

 if your property ia residential property (see MOL 205.762) and
 the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fea is:

 400,000.00 and under 125.00
 100,000.01 10 $500,000.00 .00
 Over $500,000.00 $300.00

 if the propertyis NOT residential property (soo MCL 205.752) and
 the State Equalized Valus or Taxable Value in contention ls: Fling Fea ls:

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 * Plus $26.00 for each additionalparcel, as indicated above.

 ifthe property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or grester the
 appeal does not qualify for Smal Claims. Therefore, wn Entire Tribunal petition must be filed.

 Signature requires
 uwPatitionar odmedAor AttorneyfAuthorized Representative’s25 hoeSignature: Hoharzd S702

Page 4

7ofs 7

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal

2026 Taxes appear inordinately higher than anticipated related to uncapping. In the past 4
yrs: 2022-2026 taxes increased: 162.3% (this includes the 2025 tax drop of 23.95 %).

 Per form L-4400:

 Prioramt.year2025 Current Tentative 2026 Change

Taxable value: 76,2,100 112,100 35,889

Assessed value: 99,600 112,100 1 2,500

 State actualized Value (SEV): 99,600 112,100 12,500

 Per L-4400 taxable value was projected to increase approximately: $1,819

 Actual increase: $ 2,646

 Variance: (+) $ 827

 {no longer referring to form L-4400).

UNCAPPED DATA FROM LAST 2 SALES TRANSACTIONS:

 Most recent purchase 2023/7 2026

SEV increased from 70,400 to 112,100

 YEAR SEV Tax Increase from prior year

 2023 70,400 $2,263 73.3%

 2026 112,000 $5,936 80.4%

Page 5

FRR |

Hep aks
 ——- Chg
 -:.: .: ccvo

 Z/ rorereloint] is i

 ety per

 git B
 Stores , H
 7

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-09-30_09-24-26.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 Richard H Betz,
 Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION
 v
 MTT Docket No. 26-003724
 City Of Romulus,
 Respondent.

 NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

 TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket
 number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does
 not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies
 with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents
 submitted in this case.

 Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a
 copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our
 website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer
 form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the
 placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic
 copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the
 Tribunal’s website.

 By: Tribunal Clerk
 Entered: September 30, 2026

 PROOF OF SERVICE

 I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the
 parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing
 or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized
 representatives.

 By: Tribunal Clerk

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760
 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Page 2

Richard H Betz
37116 Goddard Rd
Romulus , MI 48174

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 Richard H Betz,
 Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION
 v
 MTT Docket No. 26-003724
 City Of Romulus,
 Respondent.

 NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

 TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket
 number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does
 not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies
 with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents
 submitted in this case.

 Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a
 copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our
 website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer
 form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the
 placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic
 copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the
 Tribunal’s website.

 By: Tribunal Clerk
 Entered: September 30, 2026

 PROOF OF SERVICE

 I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the
 parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing
 or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized
 representatives.

 By: Tribunal Clerk

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760
 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

HT
 > RECEIVED

 AUG 4 2026

 STATE OF MICHIGAN RUCHEGAR: TAX TRIBUNAL
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
 GOVERNOR : LANSING DIRECTOR

 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
 VALUATION / UNCAPPING

 Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricuftural Exemption, Other
 , Special Assessments, or Nonr-Propertytax disputes.

 Pursuantto Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 278, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (1.e., Board of
 Review Daolsion or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in
 default,
 Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information i
A VA ri
 TTuE Goodland. RAK Fparin
 I «PP %2 zz 55/7%

 Emalt Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to sand stl correspondence via small)

 Section 2: Petitioner's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
 First Namo "XN Last Name
 7 E
 Firm Name (if any)

 Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Routa)

 City or Town State ZIP Code

 Telaphone Number

 Email Address (do nof enter nies you want HTT 0 send all correspondence via emai)

 Section 3: Subject Property Information usethe muttipis parost form for additionay, contiguous parcels.
 How many parcels are you Hyouare ‘more thar one parcel, ure they contiguous or adjoining?
 appealing? Cl vert No*

 A 4 **if No, you must file separate appeals for sach parcel

 Property Address (No., Strect)
 FT TLE Nr LIA ZL
 City or Town State 24P Coda
 FE poor fr NCR Ye Zz | 5E07Y

Page 2

AFT

 STATE OF MICHIGAN AR BROWN. DP
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTME F SING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LON 1. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR ARTMENT OF LICEN ING ANE DIRECTOR

 Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (oheokaii that apply)

 {J True Cash and Taxable Value

 [J Taxable Value Only (calculation)

 “52 Uncapping of Taxable Value

 Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
 Soe acon pam ed mdditorral
 Ferrel! ection 5, Lrple) A24577 Lop
 “ir apgred /.

 Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
 Did you protest the assessment ata Board of Review (BOR)? Jd Yea [a

 It Yes, check which BOR you attended: [3 March [J duty [J December

 If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Vz

 3 not requiredto attana
 [1 Appealing a purpostad Crersoat Emor or Mutust Mistake of Fact ( yes, inckade explanation in Section 5)
 [1] Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order
 = Appesting within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping
 Other

 i you chaoked “ “above, explain:
 AYA

Page 3

SLT

 STATR OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR

 Section 7: Valuation Information susethe multiple parce! form for additions, contiguous pares.
 Parcel Number:
 FR EC 078 IR o0o0Y JOA.
 Classificationof Property: Rest] PersonalIJ (check one)

 Agricutturai[1 Commercial] (ndustriat Residential ff Timber-Cutover[1 Developmental[1 Utility(J (check one)
 Assassad Value (also known as State Equalized Vatus) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review:
 by the Board of Review: yore /72 [1229

 What do you belleve Is the far ariet valuo {also known es true cash value)? ‘
 L427 [0p
 What do you betieve Is the assessed value? (multiply rue cash What do you believe ts the taxable valus? (cannot exceed
 value by 5) //A 2005 assessedvaioe) //L J)

 Fee Information
 Does the property have a Principal Residents Exemptionof atleast 50% as of the date of the Fling of this petition for all tax years at
 Issue?

 [Betves [no

 ifyou answered yes to the above question, you are pot required to pay any filing facs.

 if the property does not hinve a Principat Residence Exevption of at laast 50% as of the date of the fling of this petition for all tax years at
 Issue,the filing fee is based on the greater of the Stats EqualizedValuo or Taxable Value in dispute. If you are appealingmore than one
 parcel, the parce! with the highest State Equalized Value or Tmemble Value fe dispute wilt be ised to determine your filing foe, plus $25.60
 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total fillng fee of $1,000,00

 if your property ia residential property (see MOL 205.762) and
 the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fea is:

 400,000.00 and under 125.00
 100,000.01 10 $500,000.00 .00
 Over $500,000.00 $300.00

 if the propertyis NOT residential property (soo MCL 205.752) and
 the State Equalized Valus or Taxable Value in contention ls: Fling Fea ls:

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 * Plus $26.00 for each additionalparcel, as indicated above.

 ifthe property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or grester the
 appeal does not qualify for Smal Claims. Therefore, wn Entire Tribunal petition must be filed.

 Signature requires
 uwPatitionar odmedAor AttorneyfAuthorized Representative’s25 hoeSignature: Hoharzd S702

Page 4

7ofs 7

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal

2026 Taxes appear inordinately higher than anticipated related to uncapping. In the past 4
yrs: 2022-2026 taxes increased: 162.3% (this includes the 2025 tax drop of 23.95 %).

 Per form L-4400:

 Prioramt.year2025 Current Tentative 2026 Change

Taxable value: 76,2,100 112,100 35,889

Assessed value: 99,600 112,100 1 2,500

 State actualized Value (SEV): 99,600 112,100 12,500

 Per L-4400 taxable value was projected to increase approximately: $1,819

 Actual increase: $ 2,646

 Variance: (+) $ 827

 {no longer referring to form L-4400).

UNCAPPED DATA FROM LAST 2 SALES TRANSACTIONS:

 Most recent purchase 2023/7 2026

SEV increased from 70,400 to 112,100

 YEAR SEV Tax Increase from prior year

 2023 70,400 $2,263 73.3%

 2026 112,000 $5,936 80.4%

Page 5

FRR |

Hep aks
 ——- Chg
 -:.: .: ccvo

 Z/ rorereloint] is i

 ety per

 git B
 Stores , H
 7

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.