Richard H Betz Petitioner V City Of Romulus Respondent
- Petitioner
- Richard H Betz
- Respondent
- City Of Romulus
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-003724-TT
- Status
- Default Petitioner
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Wayne
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 09/30/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Order of Default of Petitioner | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/30/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 09/30/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/30/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/30/2026 | $0.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
2025174513 L: 59562 P: 1123 DD 05/21/2025 02:14:18 PM Total Pages: 2 Bernard J. Youngblood, Register of Deeds - Wayne County, Mi ELECTRONICALLY RECORDED MICHIGAN REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX Wayne County County Tax Stamp #728205 05/21/2025 Receipt# 25-165484 L: 59562 P: 1123 State Tax: $1,762.50 County Tax: $258.50 WARRANTY DEED H590 TUTAA KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Jonathan C. Golliher whose address is 37116 Goddard Rd. Romulus, MI 48174 Convey(s) and Warrant(s) to Richard Betz whose address is 8815 Spinnaker Way Apt. C3, Ypsilanti, MI 48197 the following described premises situated in the City of Romulus, County of Wayne, and State of Michigan to-wit: The Southerly (Southwest) 5 feet of Lot 4, all of Lot 5, all of Lot 6, and the Northerly (Northeast) 15 feet of Lot 7, of PORTER'S SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Liber 51 of Plats, page 30, Wayne County Records. Commonly known as: 37116 Goddard Rd., Romulus, MI 48174 Tax Parcel # 82-80-078-12-0004-002 for the consideration of: Two Hundred Thirty Five Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($235,000.00) subject to easement, use, building, and other restrictions of record, if any. Dated: May) , 2025 Signed and Sealed: _— Vs oT Jomathan’€. Golliher This is to certify that there are no delinquent property taxes owed to our office on this property for five years prior to the date of this instrument. No representation is made as to the status of any tax liens or titles owed to any other entities. Receipt: 255418762 Date: 5/21/2025 By: MJW (1) Eric R. Sabree, Wayne County Treasurer, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2
2025174513 Page 2 of 2 (Warranty Deed (page 2) dated: MayZ] between Jonathan C. Golliher, Seller(s) and Richard Betz, Purchaser(s).) STATE OF MICHIGAN county oF WSR The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on May 2 2025, by Jonathan C Golliher. Ii! Notary Signature: Notary Name Printed: 7s, Z,2, Notary County, Michigan 2, EX Acting in County My commission expires jashtenaw es: Eon To File No. 459072TAA Drafted by: Return to: William F. Ager, III P.33742 Richard Betz 2750 S. State Street, Ste 1 37116 Goddard Rd. Ann Arbor MI 48104 Romulus, MI 48174 County Treasurer's Certificate City Treasurer's Certificate
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. 26-003724 Respondent’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Local Unit of Government: Local Unit of Government City Of Romulus (WAYNE) First Name M.I. Last Name Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any: First Name M.I. Last Name Jennifer Stamper Firm Name (if any) City of Romulus Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 11111 Wayne City or Town State ZIP Code Romulus Michigan 48174 Telephone Number 7349427520 E-mail Address jstamper@romulusgov.com Subject Property Information: Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. *If necessary, attach a separate sheet. N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more? Yes
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal: Property was purchased by petitioner on May 21, 2025. Property was properly uncapped. Jurisdictional Issues: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES: Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended: March If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, please cite the Board’s authority? Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, please explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? No If yes, when was it issued? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE: When was the Notice of Uncapping issued? 2026-02-25 Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped? 211.24c
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Valuation Information: Parcel Identification Number: 80 078 12 0004 002 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 112100 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 112100 What do you believe is the fair market value? 224200 What do you believe is the taxable value? Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent’s Signature: /s/ Jennifer Stamper Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Richard H Betz, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-003724 City Of Romulus, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 14 days of the entry of this order. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: September 30, 2026 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5). MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-003724 Page 2 of 4 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
Richard H Betz 37116 Goddard Rd Romulus , MI 48174
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Richard H Betz, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-003724 City Of Romulus, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 14 days of the entry of this order. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.2 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: September 30, 2026 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5). MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 5
MTT Docket No. 26-003724 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
HT > RECEIVED AUG 4 2026 STATE OF MICHIGAN RUCHEGAR: TAX TRIBUNAL GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR : LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricuftural Exemption, Other , Special Assessments, or Nonr-Propertytax disputes. Pursuantto Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 278, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (1.e., Board of Review Daolsion or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default, Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information i A VA ri TTuE Goodland. RAK Fparin I «PP %2 zz 55/7% Emalt Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to sand stl correspondence via small) Section 2: Petitioner's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Namo "XN Last Name 7 E Firm Name (if any) Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Routa) City or Town State ZIP Code Telaphone Number Email Address (do nof enter nies you want HTT 0 send all correspondence via emai) Section 3: Subject Property Information usethe muttipis parost form for additionay, contiguous parcels. How many parcels are you Hyouare ‘more thar one parcel, ure they contiguous or adjoining? appealing? Cl vert No* A 4 **if No, you must file separate appeals for sach parcel Property Address (No., Strect) FT TLE Nr LIA ZL City or Town State 24P Coda FE poor fr NCR Ye Zz | 5E07Y
Page 2
AFT
STATE OF MICHIGAN AR BROWN. DP
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTME F SING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LON 1. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR ARTMENT OF LICEN ING ANE DIRECTOR
Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (oheokaii that apply)
{J True Cash and Taxable Value
[J Taxable Value Only (calculation)
“52 Uncapping of Taxable Value
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
Soe acon pam ed mdditorral
Ferrel! ection 5, Lrple) A24577 Lop
“ir apgred /.
Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
Did you protest the assessment ata Board of Review (BOR)? Jd Yea [a
It Yes, check which BOR you attended: [3 March [J duty [J December
If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Vz
3 not requiredto attana
[1 Appealing a purpostad Crersoat Emor or Mutust Mistake of Fact ( yes, inckade explanation in Section 5)
[1] Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order
= Appesting within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping
Other
i you chaoked “ “above, explain:
AYAPage 3
SLT
STATR OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information susethe multiple parce! form for additions, contiguous pares.
Parcel Number:
FR EC 078 IR o0o0Y JOA.
Classificationof Property: Rest] PersonalIJ (check one)
Agricutturai[1 Commercial] (ndustriat Residential ff Timber-Cutover[1 Developmental[1 Utility(J (check one)
Assassad Value (also known as State Equalized Vatus) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review:
by the Board of Review: yore /72 [1229
What do you belleve Is the far ariet valuo {also known es true cash value)? ‘
L427 [0p
What do you betieve Is the assessed value? (multiply rue cash What do you believe ts the taxable valus? (cannot exceed
value by 5) //A 2005 assessedvaioe) //L J)
Fee Information
Does the property have a Principal Residents Exemptionof atleast 50% as of the date of the Fling of this petition for all tax years at
Issue?
[Betves [no
ifyou answered yes to the above question, you are pot required to pay any filing facs.
if the property does not hinve a Principat Residence Exevption of at laast 50% as of the date of the fling of this petition for all tax years at
Issue,the filing fee is based on the greater of the Stats EqualizedValuo or Taxable Value in dispute. If you are appealingmore than one
parcel, the parce! with the highest State Equalized Value or Tmemble Value fe dispute wilt be ised to determine your filing foe, plus $25.60
will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total fillng fee of $1,000,00
if your property ia residential property (see MOL 205.762) and
the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fea is:
400,000.00 and under 125.00
100,000.01 10 $500,000.00 .00
Over $500,000.00 $300.00
if the propertyis NOT residential property (soo MCL 205.752) and
the State Equalized Valus or Taxable Value in contention ls: Fling Fea ls:
$100,000.00 and under $250.00
* Plus $26.00 for each additionalparcel, as indicated above.
ifthe property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or grester the
appeal does not qualify for Smal Claims. Therefore, wn Entire Tribunal petition must be filed.
Signature requires
uwPatitionar odmedAor AttorneyfAuthorized Representative’s25 hoeSignature: Hoharzd S702Page 4
7ofs 7
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
2026 Taxes appear inordinately higher than anticipated related to uncapping. In the past 4
yrs: 2022-2026 taxes increased: 162.3% (this includes the 2025 tax drop of 23.95 %).
Per form L-4400:
Prioramt.year2025 Current Tentative 2026 Change
Taxable value: 76,2,100 112,100 35,889
Assessed value: 99,600 112,100 1 2,500
State actualized Value (SEV): 99,600 112,100 12,500
Per L-4400 taxable value was projected to increase approximately: $1,819
Actual increase: $ 2,646
Variance: (+) $ 827
{no longer referring to form L-4400).
UNCAPPED DATA FROM LAST 2 SALES TRANSACTIONS:
Most recent purchase 2023/7 2026
SEV increased from 70,400 to 112,100
YEAR SEV Tax Increase from prior year
2023 70,400 $2,263 73.3%
2026 112,000 $5,936 80.4%Page 5
FRR | Hep aks ——- Chg -:.: .: ccvo Z/ rorereloint] is i ety per git B Stores , H 7
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Richard H Betz, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-003724 City Of Romulus, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: September 30, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
Richard H Betz 37116 Goddard Rd Romulus , MI 48174
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Richard H Betz, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-003724 City Of Romulus, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: September 30, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
HT > RECEIVED AUG 4 2026 STATE OF MICHIGAN RUCHEGAR: TAX TRIBUNAL GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR : LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricuftural Exemption, Other , Special Assessments, or Nonr-Propertytax disputes. Pursuantto Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 278, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (1.e., Board of Review Daolsion or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default, Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information i A VA ri TTuE Goodland. RAK Fparin I «PP %2 zz 55/7% Emalt Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to sand stl correspondence via small) Section 2: Petitioner's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Namo "XN Last Name 7 E Firm Name (if any) Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Routa) City or Town State ZIP Code Telaphone Number Email Address (do nof enter nies you want HTT 0 send all correspondence via emai) Section 3: Subject Property Information usethe muttipis parost form for additionay, contiguous parcels. How many parcels are you Hyouare ‘more thar one parcel, ure they contiguous or adjoining? appealing? Cl vert No* A 4 **if No, you must file separate appeals for sach parcel Property Address (No., Strect) FT TLE Nr LIA ZL City or Town State 24P Coda FE poor fr NCR Ye Zz | 5E07Y
Page 2
AFT
STATE OF MICHIGAN AR BROWN. DP
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTME F SING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LON 1. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR ARTMENT OF LICEN ING ANE DIRECTOR
Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (oheokaii that apply)
{J True Cash and Taxable Value
[J Taxable Value Only (calculation)
“52 Uncapping of Taxable Value
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
Soe acon pam ed mdditorral
Ferrel! ection 5, Lrple) A24577 Lop
“ir apgred /.
Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
Did you protest the assessment ata Board of Review (BOR)? Jd Yea [a
It Yes, check which BOR you attended: [3 March [J duty [J December
If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Vz
3 not requiredto attana
[1 Appealing a purpostad Crersoat Emor or Mutust Mistake of Fact ( yes, inckade explanation in Section 5)
[1] Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order
= Appesting within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping
Other
i you chaoked “ “above, explain:
AYAPage 3
SLT
STATR OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information susethe multiple parce! form for additions, contiguous pares.
Parcel Number:
FR EC 078 IR o0o0Y JOA.
Classificationof Property: Rest] PersonalIJ (check one)
Agricutturai[1 Commercial] (ndustriat Residential ff Timber-Cutover[1 Developmental[1 Utility(J (check one)
Assassad Value (also known as State Equalized Vatus) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review:
by the Board of Review: yore /72 [1229
What do you belleve Is the far ariet valuo {also known es true cash value)? ‘
L427 [0p
What do you betieve Is the assessed value? (multiply rue cash What do you believe ts the taxable valus? (cannot exceed
value by 5) //A 2005 assessedvaioe) //L J)
Fee Information
Does the property have a Principal Residents Exemptionof atleast 50% as of the date of the Fling of this petition for all tax years at
Issue?
[Betves [no
ifyou answered yes to the above question, you are pot required to pay any filing facs.
if the property does not hinve a Principat Residence Exevption of at laast 50% as of the date of the fling of this petition for all tax years at
Issue,the filing fee is based on the greater of the Stats EqualizedValuo or Taxable Value in dispute. If you are appealingmore than one
parcel, the parce! with the highest State Equalized Value or Tmemble Value fe dispute wilt be ised to determine your filing foe, plus $25.60
will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total fillng fee of $1,000,00
if your property ia residential property (see MOL 205.762) and
the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fea is:
400,000.00 and under 125.00
100,000.01 10 $500,000.00 .00
Over $500,000.00 $300.00
if the propertyis NOT residential property (soo MCL 205.752) and
the State Equalized Valus or Taxable Value in contention ls: Fling Fea ls:
$100,000.00 and under $250.00
* Plus $26.00 for each additionalparcel, as indicated above.
ifthe property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or grester the
appeal does not qualify for Smal Claims. Therefore, wn Entire Tribunal petition must be filed.
Signature requires
uwPatitionar odmedAor AttorneyfAuthorized Representative’s25 hoeSignature: Hoharzd S702Page 4
7ofs 7
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
2026 Taxes appear inordinately higher than anticipated related to uncapping. In the past 4
yrs: 2022-2026 taxes increased: 162.3% (this includes the 2025 tax drop of 23.95 %).
Per form L-4400:
Prioramt.year2025 Current Tentative 2026 Change
Taxable value: 76,2,100 112,100 35,889
Assessed value: 99,600 112,100 1 2,500
State actualized Value (SEV): 99,600 112,100 12,500
Per L-4400 taxable value was projected to increase approximately: $1,819
Actual increase: $ 2,646
Variance: (+) $ 827
{no longer referring to form L-4400).
UNCAPPED DATA FROM LAST 2 SALES TRANSACTIONS:
Most recent purchase 2023/7 2026
SEV increased from 70,400 to 112,100
YEAR SEV Tax Increase from prior year
2023 70,400 $2,263 73.3%
2026 112,000 $5,936 80.4%Page 5
FRR | Hep aks ——- Chg -:.: .: ccvo Z/ rorereloint] is i ety per git B Stores , H 7
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.