Record Finder / 26-000638-TT
Michigan
Redwood Holt Cedar Street Mi P3 LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Delhi Charter Respondent
- Petitioner
- Redwood Holt Cedar Street Mi P3 LLC
- Respondent
- Township Of Delhi Charter
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-000638-TT
- Status
- Ready Sched Prehearing Date Certain
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Ingham
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | Prehearing General Call | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/01/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 11 | Answer was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/27/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 10 | Proof of Service of Misc Documents was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/27/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | Appearance | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/27/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | Proof of service of petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/09/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/08/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Order Setting Aside P Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/30/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Amended Petition | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/28/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Order of Default of Petitioner | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/27/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | Not recorded | 2 | 05/27/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | A petition was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 04/17/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | ET Case Info Sheet | Not recorded | Not recorded | 04/17/2026 | $600.00 | Download |
Documents
Prehearing_General_Call.2026-10-01_08-57-51.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF SEPTEMBER 1- 15, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF PROCEDURE Redwood Holt Cedar Street MI P3 LLC, Petitioner, v Township Of Delhi Charter, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-000638 Please be advised that 26-000638 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General Call commencing September 01, 2027. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be notified at least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not necessarily occur in the order in which the cases are listed below. Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241. Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order will be published. In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of the Tribunal’s website.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-000638 Page 2 of 3 Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s website for more information. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall: a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.). b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures by May 5, 2027. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing Statements by May 5, 2027. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in holding a party or parties in default. See TTR 237. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on May 5, 2027, which means all discovery has been
Page 3
MTT
Page 4
ST
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Respondent Answer attachment 26-000638.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR REDWOOD HOLT CEDAR STREET MIP3 LLC MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL -----=--~---------- ' Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. _26_-o_o_o6_3_a ____ _ Charter Township of Delhi Respondent. ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX ANSWER 1. ~Admit _Deny. If denied, state the parcel number for the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Answer Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. ~Admit __ Deny. If denied, the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition is_ real_ personal. 3. _Admit _Deny. If denied, identify the contiguous and non-contiguous parcels by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 4. _Admit _Deny. If denied, identify the parcel or parcels of personal property that are not located on a parcel of real property under appeal by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 5. _Admit_Deny. N/A a. If denied, state when the personal property statements were filed, if at all: b. On what date did the March Board of Review commence: 6. _Admit ~Deny. If denied, state the classification of the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: Property is classified as Commercial - Improved MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL· 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, Ml48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, Ml 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, Ml48906
Page 2
MTT Docket No. _26_-o_o_o6_3a __ _ Page 2 of4 7. ~Admit _Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 8. _Admit _Deny _Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional r;~e if necessary): 9. _Admit _Deny _Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, state the facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if 10. ~Admit _Deny. If denied, in what County are the property or properties located in and what is the address of the property or properties: The properties are located in Ingham County. However we deny the address of the property as Petitioner listed. The correct address of the property is 41 06 Red Willow Drive. 11. ~Admit _Deny. If denied, what is the applicable local governmental unit: 12. _Admit _Deny ~Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): Respondent lacks sufficient knowledge or information on which to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation. 13. If the property's taxable value is at issue, was there an addition or loss for purposes of establishing the property's taxable value for the tax year or years at issue? _Yes ~No.
Page 3
MTT Docket No. _26_-o_o_os_38 __ _ Page 3 of4 14. ~Admit _Deny _Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 15. _Admit _Deny _Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional r~~e if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 $21,371,600 $10,685,800 $10,685,800 17. Respondent contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 $21,371,600 $10,685,800 $10,685,800 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 $4,417,000
Page 4
MTT
Page 5
STA
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Respondent COS 7.27.26.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL / REDWOOD HOLT CEDAR STREET MI MOAHR Docket No.: 26-000638 P3LLC, Tax Parcel No.: 33-25-05-23-400-035 Petitioner, v CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF DELHI, Respondent. / JEFF TRACY DAVID M. REVORE (P68929) INTEGRITY TAX CONSULTING, INC. MCGINTY, HITCH, PERSON, Representative for Petitioner ANDERSON & REVORE, P.C. 6615 Brotherhood Way Attorney for Respondent Fort Wayne, IN 46825 3410 Bell Chase Way, Suite 600 (260) 637-8899 Lansing, MI 48911 jtracy@integritytax.com (517) 351-0280 davidrevore@mcgintylaw.com / CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that she served a copy of Respondent Charter Township of Delhi’s Response to Petitioner’s Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition, Supplemental Answer/ Affirmative Defenses along with this Certificate of Service, upon Jeff Tracy, Integrity Tax Consulting, Inc, 6815 Brotherhood Way, Fort Wayne, IN 48825 by placing said documents in a sealed envelope, addressed as above and with first class postage thereon fully affixed, and by depositing said envelope in a United States mail receptacle and via email at jtracy@integritytax.com on the 27% day of July, 2026, e-filed with the Tribunal on this date. MudenuQmua pine oF Melanie S. Murphy
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Respondent Appearance 26-000638.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL / REDWOOD HOLT CEDAR STREET MI MOAHR Docket No.: 26-000638 P3 LLC, Tax Parcel No.: 33-25-05-23-400-035 Petitioner, v CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF DELHI, Respondent. / JEFF TRACY DAVID M. REVORE (P68929) INTEGRITY TAX CONSULTING, INC. MCGINTY, HITCH, PERSON, Representative for Petitioner ANDERSON & REVORE, P.C. 6615 Brotherhood Way Attorney for Respondent Fort Wayne, IN 46825 3410 Bell Chase Way, Suite 600 (260) 637-8899 Lansing, MI 48911 (517) 351-0280 davidrevore@mcgintylaw.com ATTORNEY APPEARANCE NOW COMES McGinty, Hitch, Person, Anderson & Revore, P.C., and David M. Revore, enters its Appearance on behalf of Respondent Delhi Charter Township in the captioned matter. Dated: July 27, 2026 Respectfully submitted, A — by: David M. Revore (P68929) Attorney for Respondent
Page 2
McGinty, HiTcH, PERSON, ANDERSON & REVORE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3410 BELLE CHASE WAY, SUITE 600 LANSING, MICHIGAN 48911 TELEPHONE (517) 351-0280 FAX (517) 351-3583 www. mcgintylaw.com David M. Revore, Esq. July 27, 2026 Chief Clerk Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 Re: Redwood Holt Cedar Street MI P3 LLC v Delhi Charter Township Michigan Entire Tribunal File No. 26-000638 Tax Parcel ID#: 33-25-05-23-400-035 Dear Clerk: Enclosed for filing in the captioned matter please find Respondent Delhi Township’s Appearance, Answer to Petition with Affirmative Defenses, the Township’s initial disclosures, consisting of the property record card and valuation statement, along with the Certificate of Service of the same that has been e-filed with the Tribunal on this date. Very truly yours, McGinty, Hitch, Person, Anderson = P.C. David M. Revore DMR/msm Enclosures c: Elizabeth A. Tobias, Delhi Township Assessor Jeff Tracy, Representative for Petitioner
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
SubsequentFiling.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-000638 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Respondent Files Document Type: Appearance Attachment File Name: Respondent Appearance 26-000638 Document Type: Proof of Service: Misc Documents Attachment File Name: Respondent COS 7.27.26 Document Type: Attachments to Answer Attachment File Name: Respondent Answer attachment 26-000638 Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
260709_Proof of Service for Property Tax Petition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR DIRECTOR Redwood Holt Cedar Street MI P3 LLC MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. 26-000638 Township of Delhi Charter Respondent(s) PROOF OF SERVICE FOR PROPERTY TAX PETITION *To be filed after the Tribunal issues the Notice of Docket Number* Kathy Davis filing on behalf of Jeff Tracy states that on July 9, 2026 hefshe [Name of person serving/mailing petition] [date of service] served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter upon: [Provide name and address of the following entities] 1. Assessor (via certified mail). Elizabeth Tobias - Delhi Township Assessor 2074 Aurelius Road Holt, Michigan 48842 2. City Clerk or Township Supervisor/Clerk (via certified mail): Evan Hope - Delhi Township Clerk 2074 Aurelius Road Holt, Michigan 48842 3. County Equalization Director (via first class mail or personal service): Ingham County Department of Equalization & Tax Mapping P.O. Box 319, Courthouse Mason, MI 48854 4. County Clerk (via first class mail or personal service): Barb Byrum - Ingham County Clerk 341 S Jefferson St. Mason, MI 48854 5. Secretary of the local school board (via first class mail or personal service): Jessie Jones - Holt Public Schools Secretary 5780 W Holt Road Holt, MI 48842 6. State Treasurer (via first class mail): Michigan Department of Treasury, State Treasurer 430 W. Allegan nsing, Ml 48922 NA DUD Kathy Davis - Integrity Tax Consulting [Signeture of pefgpn who is serving/mailing copy] [Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy] MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Redwood Holt Cedar Street MI P3 LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-000638 Township Of Delhi Charter, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. : Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of i the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. | Under TTR 235(1), “[tlhe respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so | will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements i or the Tribunal’s rules. I By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: July 8, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE | | certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 i PO BOX 30232, LANSING, Mi 48909 -
Page 3
STATE
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
SubsequentFiling.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-000638 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition Attachment File Name: 260709_Proof of Service for Property Tax Petition Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-07-08_09-07-41.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Redwood Holt Cedar Street MI P3 LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-000638 Township Of Delhi Charter, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: July 8, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Order_Setting_Aside_P_Default.2026-06-30_16-26-12.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Redwood Holt Cedar Street MI P3 LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-000638 , Respondent. ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner was held in default on May 27, 2026, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE. By_________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: June 30, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Entire Tribunal property tax petition signature.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Redwood Holt Cedar Street MI P3 LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) \) MTT Docket No.N/A Redwood Holt Cedar Street Ml P3 LLC Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: 33-25-05-23-400-035 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is _v real ___personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___ Yes _v No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes _¥_No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent's _¥ March July December Board of Review. MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 811 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-0760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
MTT Docket No. N/A Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): The property or properties at issue are located in Ingham County. The property or properties’ address is: Holbrook Drive Holt, MI 48842 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): Delhi Charter Township Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 7007 E Pleasant Valley Road Independence OH 44131 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): v___the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes___No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. N/A Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunals authority over the prior tax vear or years (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 21,371,600 10,685,800 10,685,800 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 16,954,600 8,477,300 8,477,300 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 4,417,000 2,208,500 2,208,500 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): We
Page 4
M
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
MITAT_SubsequentFiling.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 of 1 Docket #: 26-000638 Party Filing Document Party Filing Document: Petitioner Petitioner If 'other', Identify: File Document Type: fuFile:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
ET_Order_of_Default_Petition.2026-05-27_12-58-56.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Redwood Holt Cedar Street MI P3 LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-000638 , Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner has failed to sign the petition. See TTR 233. As such, Petitioner must file a signed petition within 14 days of the entry of this order. The petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal and if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed on the assigned docket number as an “amended petition.” Tribunal rules and information on Entire Tribunal petitions can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.i Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By:_______________________________ Entered: May 27, 2026 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-000638 Page 2 of 2 postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
2026 - Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Redwood Holt Cedar Street MI P3 LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) \4 MTT Docket No.NA Redwood Holt Cedar Street MI P3 LLC Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: 33-25-05-23-400-035 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is _v real ___ personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___ Yes _v No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___ Yes _v No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent's _¥ March July December Board of Review. MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
MTT Docket No. N/A Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): The property or properties at issue are located in Ingham County. The property or properties’ address is: Holbrook Drive Holt, M1 48842 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): Delhi Charter Township Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 7007 E Pleasant Valley Road Independence OH 44131 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): v the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition orloss? ___ Yes ___ No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. N/A Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 21,371,600 10,685,800 10,685,800 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 16,954,600 8,477,300 8,477,300 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 4,417,000 2,208,500 2,208,500 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if
Page 4
MTT Docket
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
2026 - Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Redwood Holt Cedar Street MI P3 LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) \4 MTT Docket No.NA Redwood Holt Cedar Street MI P3 LLC Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: 33-25-05-23-400-035 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is _v real ___ personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___ Yes _v No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___ Yes _v No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent's _¥ March July December Board of Review. MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
MTT Docket No. N/A Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): The property or properties at issue are located in Ingham County. The property or properties’ address is: Holbrook Drive Holt, M1 48842 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): Delhi Charter Township Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 7007 E Pleasant Valley Road Independence OH 44131 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): v the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition orloss? ___ Yes ___ No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. N/A Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 21,371,600 10,685,800 10,685,800 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 16,954,600 8,477,300 8,477,300 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 4,417,000 2,208,500 2,208,500 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if
Page 4
MTT Docket
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
09._Entire_Tribunal_Case_Information_Sheet_Must_Upload_Petition_.a9392d67-bd27-4262-a2ad-8a8719cc52c9.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MOAHR DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Individual First Name/Company Name Redwood Holt Cedar Street MI P3 LLC M.I. Last Name Redwood Holt Cedar Street MI P3 LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 7007 E Pleasant Valley Road City or Town Independence State Ohio ZIP Code 44131 Telephone Number 4402634106 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jmiller@byredwood.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Jeff M.I. Last Name Tracy Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 6615 Brotherhood Way City or Town Fort Wayne State Indiana ZIP Code 46825 Telephone Number 260-637-8899 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jtracy@integritytax.com Section 5: Issue Please designate one: Valuation – Fill out Sections 4, 5, & 6 below Section 6: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing?1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] Holbrook Drive Holt Michigan 48842 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Delhi Charter (INGHAM) County Ingham If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? No (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Section 7: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Section 8: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 33-25-05-23-400-035 Classification of Property: Real Commercial Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 10685800 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 10685800 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 16954600 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 8477300 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Section 9: Assessment Information Type of Tax Assessment(s): Assessment Number(s): Check all that is being appealed: Check what action prompted this appeal: If “other,” please explain: Section 10: Special Assessment Information Type of Special Assessment: Did you protest the special assessment at the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? If Yes, what was the date of the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? If No, please explain: Section 11: Classification Information Parcel Number: Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: What do you believe is the property’s classification?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR If improved property, how is the property currently being used? If improved property, for what use was the property designed? Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.