Record Finder / 26-002919-TT
Michigan
Redwan Chowdhury Petitioner V City Of Novi Respondent
- Petitioner
- Redwan Chowdhury
- Respondent
- City Of Novi
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-002919-TT
- Status
- Default Petitioner
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Oakland
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Order of Default of Petitioner | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/09/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 10/09/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 10/09/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/08/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/30/2026 | $0.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
SC_Order_of_Default_of_Petition.2026-10-09_15-33-26.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Redwan Chowdhury, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002919 City Of Novi, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 14 days of the entry of this order. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: October 9, 2026 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002919 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Redwan Chowdhury, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002919 City Of Novi, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 14 days of the entry of this order. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.2 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: October 9, 2026 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 26-002919 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
22727 Foxmoor Dr - Assessed Value Appeal.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
Value Comparison with Nearby Houses Address Assessed Value (2026) by Novi City Sq Ft. Value/ Sq Ft Built In Bed + Bath Basement 22727 Foxmoor Dr $304,300 2697 $113 1990 4 + 2.5 1128 sq ft 22719 Foxmoor Dr $315,660 3169 $99 1990 4 + 2.5 1153 sq ft 22733 Foxmoor Dr $282,340 2662 $106 1990 4 + 2.5 1015 sq ft 22704 Foxmoor Dr $292,870 2790 $104 1990 4 + 2.5 1103 sq ft 22728 Foxmoor Dr $303,640 2855 $106 1990 4 + 2.5 1500 sq ft
Page 2
22740 Foxmoor Dr $292,770 2696 $108 1990 4 + 2.5 1301 sq ft 22716 Foxmoor Dr $269,080 2484 $108 1990 4 + 2.5 958 sq ft
Page 3
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 22727 Foxmoor Dr 22733 Foxmoor Dr 22704 Foxmoor Dr 22719 Foxmoor Dr 22716 Foxmoor Dr 22728 Foxmoor Dr 22740 Foxmoor Dr Change in SEV in 2 Years Address SEV 2024 SEV 2026 % Increase 22727 Foxmoor Dr 251,570 $ 304,300 $ 21% 22733 Foxmoor Dr 242,400 $ 282,340 $ 16% 22704 Foxmoor Dr 251,270 $ 292,870 $ 17% 22719 Foxmoor Dr 270,150 $ 315,660 $ 17% 22716 Foxmoor Dr 231,300 $ 269,000 $ 16% 22728 Foxmoor Dr 260,780 $ 303,640 $ 16% 22740 Foxmoor Dr 251,470 $ 292,770 $ 16%
Page 4
Comparison with Recently Sold Property in Royal Crown Address 22691 Foxmoor Dr 22727 Foxmoor Dr Sold In 2025 2025 Sale Price $750,000 $565,000 Sale Price/ Sq Ft $261 $209 Assessed Value $319,200 $304,300 Assessed Value/ Sq Ft $111 $113
Page 5
➢ Worn and uneven 30-year-old flooring, bathroom ➢ Degrading siding requiring upgrades.
Page 6
➢ Deck ruined by carpenter ants and bees. ➢ City's neglected backyard creek.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
scpetition_valuation.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 1 of 3 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. Petitioner’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Individual Local Unit of Government: First Name Redwan M.I. Last Name Chowdhury Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 22727 Foxmoor Dr City or Town Novi State Michigan ZIP Code 48374 Telephone Number 4053385598 E-mail Address redwan.j.chowdhury@gmail.com Subject Property Information: How many parcels are you appealing? 1 If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? *If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel N/A Property Address (No., Street) 22727 Foxmoor Dr City or Town Novi County Oakland State Michigan ZIP Code 48374 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Novi (OAKLAND) Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 2 of 3 I respectfully appeal the current assessed value and State Equalized Value (SEV) of the subject property - 22727 Foxmoor Dr, Novi, MI 48374 - because the valuation does not accurately reflect the property’s present condition or its value relative to comparable properties within the neighborhood. A review of similarly situated properties indicates that the subject property is assessed significantly higher based on several relevant valuation metrics, including: - Assessed value per square foot compared with similar neighboring properties; - Percentage increase in assessed value over the past several years compared with similar properties; and - Assessed value per square foot of comparable properties that have recently sold. Based on these comparisons, the subject property’s assessment appears excessive and inconsistent with the assessments and recent market data for comparable properties. In addition, the current assessment does not adequately account for the age, deterioration, and required repairs associated with several major components of the property, including: - The siding is deteriorating and requires substantial repair or replacement. - The approximately 30-year-old flooring is worn and uneven. - The windows are old and require replacement. - The approximately 20-year-old roof is nearing the end of its expected useful life. - The deck has sustained significant damage from carpenter ants and carpenter bees and requires major repair or replacement. - The backyard creek has not been adequately maintained by the city, adversely affecting the property’s condition, usability, enjoyment, and overall marketability. ** Additional documents to support my claim are attached For these reasons, the current assessed value and SEV do not fairly represent the property’s actual condition or its value in relation to comparable properties. I respectfully request that the assessment be reviewed and reduced to a fair and equitable amount supported by the comparable-property data and the documented condition of the property. Jurisdictional Issues: Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? No If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Not required to attend Year(s) Under Appeal: 2026 Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal: Parcel Number: 50-22-28-428-007 Classification of Property: Personal (check one) Residential (check one)
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 3 of 3 Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 304300 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 304300 What do you believe is the fair market value? 570000 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 285000 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner’s Signature: /s/ Redwan Chowdhury Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/ Fee Information: If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for the filing of this appeal. The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. Property tax appeal: Residential** Non-Residential SEV or TV in contention* Filing fee*** Filing Fee** $100,000 or less...........................................................................................$ 125.00 $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00.........................................................................$ 200.00 N/A More than $500,000…..................................................................................$ 300.00 N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? Yes
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Record Card.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
*** Information herein deemed reliable but not guaranteed*** OAKLAND County: CITY OF NOVI Jurisdiction: Printed on Parcel Number: 50-22-28-428-007 191,190C 251,570 203,430 48,140 2024 211,540C 286,990 234,670 52,320 2025 304,300S 304,300M 304,300 249,880 54,420 2026 Tentative Tentative Tentative Tentative 2027 Taxable Value Tribunal/ Other Board of Review Assessed Value Building Value Land Value Year Land Improvement Cost Estimates Description Rate Size % Good Cash Value D/W/P: 3.5 Concrete 7.29 710 74 3,830 Total Estimated Land Improvements True Cash Value = 3,830 * Factors * Description Frontage Depth Front Depth Rate %Adj. Reason Value 82.62 130.00 0.9936 1.0198 1400 100 117,205 75 Actual Front Feet, 0.26 Total Acres Total Est. Land Value = 117,205 Land Value Estimates for Land Table R2808.ROYAL CROWN JS 01/23/2025 DESK TOP R bmc 01/10/2025 DESK TOP R 09/04/1991 INSPECTED Who When What Level Rolling Low High Landscaped Swamp Wooded Pond Waterfront Ravine Wetland Flood Plain Topography of Site Dirt Road Gravel Road Paved Road Storm Sewer Sidewalk Water Sewer Electric Gas Curb Street Lights Standard Utilities Underground Utils. Public Improvements Vacant Improved X The Equalizer. Copyright (c) 1999 - 2009. Licensed To: City of Novi, County of Oakland, Michigan 01/23/2025: MLS 81025000914, added microwave, (2) extra sinks, and sep shower. “Collection of physical characteristics involving this parcel of improved property involved invoking an Extraordinary Assumption in adherence with the current edition of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice which includes information pertaining to measurements, interior information and condition of the property. Information is assumed reliable. If the information relied on is false it could alter our analyses and opinions reached.” (js) 1/25 added basement rec per listing 20240093683 “Collection of physical characteristics involving this parcel of improved property involved invoking an Extraordinary Assumption in adherence with the current edition of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice which includes information pertaining to measurements, interior information and condition of the property. Information is assumed Comments/Influences T1N, R8E, SEC 28 ROYAL CROWN ESTATES NO 1 LOT 17 8-3-89 FR 400-010 Tax Description CHOWDHURY, REDWAN JAHID FARIA, MARIUL 22727 FOXMOOR DR NOVI MI 48374 Owner's Name/Address 22727 FOXMOOR DR Property Address 2027 Est TCV Tentative MAP #: P.R.E. 100% 02/13/2025 School: NORTHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS Status Number Date Building Permit(s) Zoning: R-3 Class: RESIDENTIAL-IMPROV 100.0 DEED 21968-186 03-ARM'S LENGTH PTA 09/21/2000 365,000 JOINGOZIAN, ELIZABETH GAYL SWAMBA, CASPER T & DANA M 0.0 DEED L49061-P752 21-NOT USED/OTHER QC 02/11/2016 1 JINGOZIAN, ELIZABETH & PAU JINGOZIAN, ELIZABETH GAYLE 0.0 DEED L50757-P657 21-NOT USED/OTHER QC 06/01/2017 1 JINGOZIAN, PAUL G JINGOZIAN, ELIZABETH & PAU 100.0 DEED L60005-P527 03-ARM'S LENGTH WD 02/13/2025 565,000 CHOWDHURY, REDWAN JAHID JINGOZIAN, PAUL G Prcnt. Trans. Verified By Liber & Page Terms of Sale Inst. Type Sale Date Sale Price Grantee Grantor 10/09/2026
Page 2
Class: B Effec. Age: 37 Floor Area: 2,697 Total Base New : 737,355 E.C.F. Total Depr Cost: 464,533 X 1.090 Estimated T.C.V: 506,341 Cost Est. for Res. Bldg: 1 Single Family TWO STORY Cls B Blt 1990 (11) Heating System: Forced Heat & Cool Ground Area = 1852 SF Floor Area = 2697 SF. Phy/Ab.Phy/Func/Econ/Comb. % Good=63/100/100/100/63 Building Areas Stories Exterior Foundation Size Cost New Depr. Cost 2 Story Siding Basement 747 1 Story Siding Basement 120 1 Story Siding Basement 261 1 Story Siding Slab 724 1 Story Siding Overhang 20 1 Story Siding Overhang 78 Total: 571,056 359,765 Other Additions/Adjustments Recreation Room 740 24,376 15,357 Exterior Brick Veneer 1584 37,715 23,760 Plumbing 3 Fixture Bath 1 11,173 7,039 2 Fixture Bath 1 7,449 4,693 Extra Sink 2 3,710 2,337 Separate Shower 1 3,396 2,139 Porches CPP 56 2,004 1,263 WCP (1 Story) 169 12,168 7,666 Deck Treated Wood 264 5,871 3,699 Garages Class: B Exterior: Brick Foundation: 42 Inch (Unfinished) Base Cost 462 42,005 26,463 <<<<< Calculations too long. See Valuation printout for complete pricing. >>>>> Carport Area: Roof: Bsmnt Garage: Year Built: 1990 Car Capacity: Class: B Exterior: Brick Brick Ven.: 0 Stone Ven.: 0 Common Wall: 1.5 Wal Foundation: 42 Inch Finished ?: Auto. Doors: 0 Mech. Doors: 0 Area: 462 % Good: 0 Storage Area: 0 No Conc. Floor: 0 (17) Garage CPP WCP (1 Story) Treated Wood 56 169 264 Type Area (16) Porches/Decks Interior 1 Story Interior 2 Story 2nd/Same Stack Two Sided Exterior 1 Story Exterior 2 Story Prefab 1 Story Prefab 2 Story Heat Circulator Raised Hearth Wood Stove Direct-Vented Gas 1 (15) Fireplaces Appliance Allow. Cook Top Dishwasher Garbage Disposal Bath Heater Vent Fan Hot Tub Unvented Hood Vented Hood Intercom Jacuzzi Tub Jacuzzi repl.Tub Oven Microwave Standard Range Self Clean Range Sauna Trash Compactor Central Vacuum Security System 1 1 1 1 1 1 (15) Built-ins Lump Sum Items: Public Water Public Sewer Water Well 1000 Gal Septic 2000 Gal Septic 1 1 (14) Water/Sewer Average Fixture(s) 3 Fixture Bath 2 Fixture Bath Softener, Auto Softener, Manual Solar Water Heat No Plumbing Extra Toilet Extra Sink Separate Shower Ceramic Tile Floor Ceramic Tile Wains Ceramic Tub Alcove Vent Fan 2 1 2 1 (13) Plumbing Few Ave. Many X No. of Elec. Outlets Min Ord. Ex. X No./Qual. of Fixtures Amps Service 0 (12) Electric Central Air Wood Furnace Forced Air w/o Ducts Forced Air w/ Ducts Forced Hot Water Electric Baseboard Elec. Ceil. Radiant Radiant (in-floor) Electric Wall Heat Space Heater Wall/Floor Furnace Forced Heat & Cool Heat Pump No Heating/Cooling X Elec. Steam Oil Coal Gas Wood X (11)
Page 3
***
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
scanswer_valuation.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. 26-002919 Respondent’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government: City Of Novi (OAKLAND) First Name M.I. Last Name Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any: First Name Jeanette M.I. Last Name Schrameck Firm Name (if any) City of Novi Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 45175 Ten Mile Rd City or Town Novi State Michigan ZIP Code 48175 Telephone Number 2483470486 E-mail Address jschrameck@cityofnovi.org Subject Property Information: Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. *If necessary, attach a separate sheet. N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more? Yes
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal: The 2026 March Board of Review, acting within its authority as prescribed under State of Michigan Statute MCL 211.27a(3) denied petitioner's protest of assessed value. The Board of Review cited the property "at market value." The assessment as equalized does not exceed 50% of True Cash Value. The sales of similar properties justifies the value. Jurisdictional Issues: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES: Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended: March If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, please cite the Board’s authority? Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, please explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? No If yes, when was it issued? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE: When was the Notice of Uncapping issued? Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Valuation Information: Parcel Identification Number: 50-22-28-428-007 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 304300 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 304300 What do you believe is the fair market value? 608600 What do you believe is the taxable value? Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent’s Signature: /s/ Jeanette Schrameck Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
SC_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-10-08_16-11-07.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Redwan Chowdhury, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002919 City Of Novi, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: October 8, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Redwan Chowdhury, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002919 City Of Novi, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: October 8, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
22727 Foxmoor Dr - Assessed Value Appeal.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
Value Comparison with Nearby Houses Address Assessed Value (2026) by Novi City Sq Ft. Value/ Sq Ft Built In Bed + Bath Basement 22727 Foxmoor Dr $304,300 2697 $113 1990 4 + 2.5 1128 sq ft 22719 Foxmoor Dr $315,660 3169 $99 1990 4 + 2.5 1153 sq ft 22733 Foxmoor Dr $282,340 2662 $106 1990 4 + 2.5 1015 sq ft 22704 Foxmoor Dr $292,870 2790 $104 1990 4 + 2.5 1103 sq ft 22728 Foxmoor Dr $303,640 2855 $106 1990 4 + 2.5 1500 sq ft
Page 2
22740 Foxmoor Dr $292,770 2696 $108 1990 4 + 2.5 1301 sq ft 22716 Foxmoor Dr $269,080 2484 $108 1990 4 + 2.5 958 sq ft
Page 3
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 22727 Foxmoor Dr 22733 Foxmoor Dr 22704 Foxmoor Dr 22719 Foxmoor Dr 22716 Foxmoor Dr 22728 Foxmoor Dr 22740 Foxmoor Dr Change in SEV in 2 Years Address SEV 2024 SEV 2026 % Increase 22727 Foxmoor Dr 251,570 $ 304,300 $ 21% 22733 Foxmoor Dr 242,400 $ 282,340 $ 16% 22704 Foxmoor Dr 251,270 $ 292,870 $ 17% 22719 Foxmoor Dr 270,150 $ 315,660 $ 17% 22716 Foxmoor Dr 231,300 $ 269,000 $ 16% 22728 Foxmoor Dr 260,780 $ 303,640 $ 16% 22740 Foxmoor Dr 251,470 $ 292,770 $ 16%
Page 4
Comparison with Recently Sold Property in Royal Crown Address 22691 Foxmoor Dr 22727 Foxmoor Dr Sold In 2025 2025 Sale Price $750,000 $565,000 Sale Price/ Sq Ft $261 $209 Assessed Value $319,200 $304,300 Assessed Value/ Sq Ft $111 $113
Page 5
➢ Worn and uneven 30-year-old flooring, bathroom ➢ Degrading siding requiring upgrades.
Page 6
➢ Deck ruined by carpenter ants and bees. ➢ City's neglected backyard creek.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
scpetition_valuation.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 1 of 3 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. Petitioner’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Individual Local Unit of Government: First Name Redwan M.I. Last Name Chowdhury Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 22727 Foxmoor Dr City or Town Novi State Michigan ZIP Code 48374 Telephone Number 4053385598 E-mail Address redwan.j.chowdhury@gmail.com Subject Property Information: How many parcels are you appealing? 1 If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? *If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel N/A Property Address (No., Street) 22727 Foxmoor Dr City or Town Novi County Oakland State Michigan ZIP Code 48374 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Novi (OAKLAND) Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 2 of 3 I respectfully appeal the current assessed value and State Equalized Value (SEV) of the subject property - 22727 Foxmoor Dr, Novi, MI 48374 - because the valuation does not accurately reflect the property’s present condition or its value relative to comparable properties within the neighborhood. A review of similarly situated properties indicates that the subject property is assessed significantly higher based on several relevant valuation metrics, including: - Assessed value per square foot compared with similar neighboring properties; - Percentage increase in assessed value over the past several years compared with similar properties; and - Assessed value per square foot of comparable properties that have recently sold. Based on these comparisons, the subject property’s assessment appears excessive and inconsistent with the assessments and recent market data for comparable properties. In addition, the current assessment does not adequately account for the age, deterioration, and required repairs associated with several major components of the property, including: - The siding is deteriorating and requires substantial repair or replacement. - The approximately 30-year-old flooring is worn and uneven. - The windows are old and require replacement. - The approximately 20-year-old roof is nearing the end of its expected useful life. - The deck has sustained significant damage from carpenter ants and carpenter bees and requires major repair or replacement. - The backyard creek has not been adequately maintained by the city, adversely affecting the property’s condition, usability, enjoyment, and overall marketability. ** Additional documents to support my claim are attached For these reasons, the current assessed value and SEV do not fairly represent the property’s actual condition or its value in relation to comparable properties. I respectfully request that the assessment be reviewed and reduced to a fair and equitable amount supported by the comparable-property data and the documented condition of the property. Jurisdictional Issues: Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? No If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Not required to attend Year(s) Under Appeal: 2026 Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal: Parcel Number: 50-22-28-428-007 Classification of Property: Personal (check one) Residential (check one)
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 3 of 3 Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 304300 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 304300 What do you believe is the fair market value? 570000 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 285000 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner’s Signature: /s/ Redwan Chowdhury Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/ Fee Information: If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for the filing of this appeal. The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. Property tax appeal: Residential** Non-Residential SEV or TV in contention* Filing fee*** Filing Fee** $100,000 or less...........................................................................................$ 125.00 $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00.........................................................................$ 200.00 N/A More than $500,000…..................................................................................$ 300.00 N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? Yes
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.