Naser Holdings X111 LLC, Petitioner V City Of Dearborn, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Naser Holdings X111 LLC
- Respondent
- City Of Dearborn
Case overview
- Docket number
- 24-003472-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Wayne
- Judge
- Wallace, Brett
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | Consent Judgment | Not recorded | 12 | 08/19/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 13 | Stip for Consent Judgment | PET | 12 | 08/19/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 12 | A Stipulation has been received. | PET | Not recorded | 08/18/2025 | $25.00 | Download |
| 11 | Evidence was received. | RESP | Not recorded | 07/29/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 10 | Notice of Hearing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/28/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | A hearing has been scheduled | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/28/2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| 8 | Order Setting Aside R Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 11/19/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Notice of Filing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 11/19/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Attachments to the Answer were filed | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/30/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/30/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Order Holding Party in Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/30/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 09/17/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/17/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/31/2024 | $250.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Naser Holdings X111 LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003472 City of Dearborn, Presiding Judge Respondent. Jason C. Grinnell ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the Stipulation and finds that it comports with the mandates of State law.1 As a result, the Tribunal shall enter the parties’ Stipulation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise indicated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2013, through June 30, 2016, at the rate of 4.25%, 1 See MCL 211.27a. 2 See MCL 205.755.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003472 Page 2 of 2 (ii) after June 30, 2016, through December 31, 2016, at the rate of 4.40%, (iii) after December 31, 2016, through June 30, 2017, at the rate of 4.50%, (iv) after June 30, 2017, through December 31, 2017, at the rate of 4.70%, (v) after December 31, 2017, through June 30, 2018, at the rate of 5.15%, (vi) after June 30, 2018, through December 31, 2018, at the rate of 5.41%, (vii) after December 31, 2018, through June 30, 2019, at the rate of 5.9%, (viii) after June 30, 2019, through December 31, 2019, at the rate of 6.39%, (ix) after December 31, 2019, through June 30, 2020, at the rate of 6.40%, (x) after June 30 2020, through December 31, 2020, at the rate of 5.63%, (xi) after December 31, 2020, through June 30, 2022, at the rate of 4.25%, (xii) after June 30, 2022, through December 31, 2022, at the rate of 4.27%, (xiii) after December 31, 2022, through June 30, 2023, at the rate of 5.65%, (xiv) after June 30, 2023, through December 31, 2023, at the rate of 8.25%, (xv) after December 31, 2023, through June 30, 2024, at the rate of 9.30%, (xvi) after June 30, 2024, through December 31, 2024, at the rate of 9.50%, (xvii) after December 31, 2024, through June 30, 2025, at the rate of 9.47%, and (xviii) after June 30, 2025, through December 31, 2025, at the rate of 8.66%. This Consent Judgment resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. See docket look up for a copy of stipulation and for any possible refund paragraph. By _______________________________ Entered: August 19, 2025 jmb PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEMS Naser Holdings X111 LLC Petitioner, MTT Docket No, 24-003472 City of Dearborn Respondent, STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT 1. The case is pending in the ____ Entire Tribunal OR _X___ Small Claims Division. 2 The subject property is in _ WAYNE County. 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board Property Parcel No. __82-09-214-03-006 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 4, The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: | Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 203d | Gof soo YS 00 | HJ 700 lols | 879 40 | ¥33 700 | 939 700] 5. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: | Tax Year, | True Cash Value | State Equalized Value Taxable Value | 22a 732000 Ses, 000 2¢cs, coo | Roc | 720,000 | 24 C opo 24.5, cod
Page 2
Docket # 24-003472 6. If stipulation addresses tax years other than the tax year originally appealed or tax years added through motions to amend that have been granted by the Tribunal, list the separate facts upon which the parties rely to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over those tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 7: List all reasons (with explanation) why the stipulation’s taxable value does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable inflation rate. (e.g. transfer of ownership, additions, losses, omitted property etc . . .) 8. List separately any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of this Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): The Petitioner and their agent hereto agree and stipulate that any order or decision of the Michigan Tax Tribunal which may result in a refund shall be made payable to PropTax America for distribution. Refund payments shall be forwarded to the following address: PropTax America i 26923 Havelock Dearborn Heights, MI 48127 Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Printed Name Sam Miller / PropTax America Date: S//s 7, 25 Signature of Respondent’s authorized representative: yy Hon Vd Printed Name Jacob Thurston /Dbn Assn Date: §/18/2S [Consent Judgment will be prepared by the Tribunal.]
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEMS Naser Holdings X111 LLC Petitioner, MTT Docket No, 24-003472 City of Dearborn Respondent, STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT 1. The case is pending in the ____ Entire Tribunal OR _X___ Small Claims Division. 2 The subject property is in _ WAYNE County. 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board Property Parcel No. __82-09-214-03-006 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 4, The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: | Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 203d | Gof soo YS 00 | HJ 700 lols | 879 40 | ¥33 700 | 939 700] 5. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: | Tax Year, | True Cash Value | State Equalized Value Taxable Value | 22a 732000 Ses, 000 2¢cs, coo | Roc | 720,000 | 24 C opo 24.5, cod
Page 2
Docket # 24-003472 6. If stipulation addresses tax years other than the tax year originally appealed or tax years added through motions to amend that have been granted by the Tribunal, list the separate facts upon which the parties rely to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over those tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 7: List all reasons (with explanation) why the stipulation’s taxable value does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable inflation rate. (e.g. transfer of ownership, additions, losses, omitted property etc . . .) 8. List separately any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of this Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): The Petitioner and their agent hereto agree and stipulate that any order or decision of the Michigan Tax Tribunal which may result in a refund shall be made payable to PropTax America for distribution. Refund payments shall be forwarded to the following address: PropTax America i 26923 Havelock Dearborn Heights, MI 48127 Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Printed Name Sam Miller / PropTax America Date: S//s 7, 25 Signature of Respondent’s authorized representative: yy Hon Vd Printed Name Jacob Thurston /Dbn Assn Date: §/18/2S [Consent Judgment will be prepared by the Tribunal.]
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
VALUATION DISCLOSURE LOCATED AT 22600 Michigan Ave Dearborn, MI 48124 Lots 1 to 6 E J Horger's Subdivision FOR Jeremy Romer Corporation Counsel City of Dearborn AS OF December 31, 2023 BY Jacob Thurston Assessor of Record City of Dearborn 16901 Michigan Avenue, Suite 5 Dearborn MI 48126
Page 2
Jacob Thurston Assessor of Record Assessing Department 16901 Michigan Ave, Suite 5 Dearborn MI 48126 July 29, 2025 Michigan Tax Tribunal Attn: Clerk of the Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 Re: Property: 22600 Michigan Ave Dearborn, MI 48124 Borrower: Cash Basis Valuation Disclosure File No.: MTT 24-003472 Opinion of Value: $ 750,000 Effective Date: December 31, 2023 | have conducted a valuation disclosure of the above referenced property. The report of this disclosure is attached. The purpose of this disclosure is to develop an opinion of true cash value for the property described in this report, as improved, in an unencumbered fee simple title ownership. This report is based on a physical analysis of the site and improvements, a location analysis of the neighborhood and city, and an economic analysis of the market for properties such as the subject. The opinion of value reported above is as of the stated effective tax date(s) and limiting conditions included. Please do not hesitate to contact me if | can be of additional service to you. Sincerely, Gat Thernatzn Jacob Thurston, MMAO Assessor of Record City of Dearborn 16901 Michigan Avenue, Suite 5 Dearborn MI 48126
Page 3
Client Jeremy Romer oo Co oo File No. MTT 24-003472 Property Address 22600 Michigan Ave oo _ eo SE BE City Dearborn County Wayne oo State MI Zip Code 48124 Client Jeremy Romer TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Page ....... ee 1 Letter of Transmittal 2 Valuation Disclosure Short Form 3 Valuation Disclosure Short Form ... 4 Valuation Disclosure Short Form . 5 Valuation Disclosure Short Form ... 6 Additional Comparables 4-6 . 7 General Text Addendum 8 Subject Street Scenes . 13 Comparable Photos Minimal 1-3 14 Comparable Photos Minimal 4-6 . 15 Comparable Sales 1 - 5 Location Map 16 Zoning Map 17 Neighborhood Map .. 18 Site Map ......... 19
Page 4
VALUATION DISCLOSURE File Number: ~~ MTT 24-003472 Borower: Cash Basis Valuation Disclosure Property Owner. Nasser Holdings X111 LLC Property Name: Dearborn — Property Address: 22600 Michigan Ave Oy: Dearborn State: MI Zip Code: 48124 | County: Wayne Property Type: [] Office [| Retal [| Industrial [| Residential | | VacantSte [| Agiiculural [DQ] Other (Describe Other) Convenience Gas Station Preparer. Jacob Thurston Preparer's Phone: 313-943-2150 parer's EMail_jthurston@dearborn.gov ASSESSED VALUE, TAXES, AND FEES Assessor's Parcel Number(s) | Land Improvements Total | Taxes ‘Special Assessments Tax Year 82-09-214-03-006 $ 113,500 $ 326,200 § 439,700($ 29,594.90 |$ 0 2025 $ 126,000 $ 326,700/% 452700/8 31,521.34 |s 02024 [Association Fees: §_None SALE; OPTION, LISTING AND OFFER HISTORY Pending Sale Price: $ None | Anticipated Closing Date: ~~ None: Current List Price: § None According to the available data sources, there have been no sales or listings of the subject property in the last 3 years. [Analyze all sales of the subject property within the fast 3 years, current options, listings, or offers to purchase (if applicable). The most recent recorded sale of subject was reported on 7/6/2021 with a price of $715,429 (municipal records). This is slightly below the contemporary value conclusion of $750,000 as of 12/31/2023. The previous subject property sale price supports the $750,000 conclusion of value when indexed by the CoStar General Retail Price Index for the Dearborn submarket which has shown an 10.95% increase since the most recent subject property sale: $715,429 * 1.1095 = $793,768. MARKET AREA DESCRIPTION Subject's Neighborhood. XK Suburban [7] Urban [7] Rural B Co Neighborhood Maintenance Levels: | [] Excellent [] Good [BQ Average | Fair | Poor Co — Subject Is: || Superior 3 Similar [] Inferior to the Competing Neighborhood Properties BN —— Neighborhood Composition: 60 % Retail 1% Industrial 15 % Office 5 % Vacant Land 5 % Apartments (Estimate Percentages) 10 % Homes % Agricutural 4 % Other (describe other) Condominium a a — Neighborhood Stage: (OX) Suble [J Growth [] Decine [] Revialzation (od structures fo new) Demand/Supply: InBalance | Oversupply | Shortage of Available Properties Overall Real Estate Values:
Page 5
VAL
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Naser Holdings X111 LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No.: 24-003472 City Of Dearborn, Respondent. NOTICE OF TELEPHONE HEARING The Tribunal has scheduled a telephone hearing to be conducted as follows. Hearings are generally 30 minutes in length. HEARING DATE: August 19, 2025 HEARING TIME: 10:45 AM EST JOIN BY PHONE: 1-248-509-0316 ACCESS CODE: 495507942 This hearing will be held by telephone conference call with the Judge as the host. In order to join the hearing, call the phone number listed above at least 5 minutes prior to the hearing time. You will then be required to input the access code, followed by # to connect. The Tribunal judge will call in and join by phone at the hearing time. Failure to timely call in may result in the placement of a party or parties in default. This is an important legal document. Please have someone translate the document. Este es un documento legal importante. Por favor, haga traducir este documento. এটি একটি গুরুত্বপূর্ণ আইনি দলিল, অনুগ্রহ করে কেউ দলিলটিকে অনুবাদ করুন। .ةقيثولا مجرتت صخش كيدل ىجري ةماه ةينوناق ةقيثو وه اذه Ito ay isang mahalagang legal na dokumento. Mangyari lamang na magkaroon ng isang tao isalin ang dokumento.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003472 Page 2 of 12 HEARING INFORMATION – PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY GENERAL INFORMATION: An impartial hearing will be conducted in accordance with the Michigan Tax Tribunal Rules (R 792.10201-R 792.10297) and the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act, MCL 24.201 et seq. The Michigan Rules of Evidence and the Michigan Court Rules may be applicable. Parties are expected to exercise proper respect and courtesy toward other parties, witnesses, and administrative law judges, which includes attending the hearing on time, silencing cell phones, and choosing a quiet, private location to participate in the hearing to limit distractions and ensure minimal background noise. The hearing may be recorded for notetaking purposes, but the recording is not a formal record, unless otherwise provided for by the Tribunal. REPRESENTATION: You may have an attorney or anyone else of your choice represent you at the hearing. The Tribunal does not recommend or appoint representatives for you and will not pay for your representative. WITNESSES: You may have anyone join you at the hearing to speak in support of your case. However, the time to present your case is limited and additional time may not be provided to accommodate witness testimony. DOCUMENTATION: Parties are required to submit all documents in support of their contentions to both the Tribunal and the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents were previously submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to both the Tribunal and the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be submitted to the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s electronic filing (e- filing) system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to submission by e-mail. If sent by mail, the documents must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized representative at the address identified in the petition or answer for that party or authorized representative, unless the party or authorized representative filed an appearance or other documentation identifying a different mailing address. The documents do not need to be resubmitted after the Notice of Hearing if they were previously submitted to the Tribunal and the opposing party in this case. If a hearing had previously been scheduled in this case and adjourned, and the adjournment order indicates that the parties are precluded from submitting any further documentary evidence, no further documentary evidence will be accepted even if filed and exchanged as indicated above. INCLUSION OF SUBSEQUENT TAX YEARS: Subsequent tax year assessments are automatically included in valuation appeals once the assessment has been established for that tax year. For purposes of administrative efficiency, the Tribunal considers this date April 1st. As such, the parties should submit documentation and be prepared to discuss subsequent tax year assessments at hearings to be
Page 3
MT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Naser Holdings X111 LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003472 City Of Dearborn, Respondent. ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Respondent was held in default on October 30, 2024, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE. By_________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: November 19, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Naser Holdings X111 LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003472 City Of Dearborn, Respondent. ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Respondent was held in default on October 30, 2024, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE. By_________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: November 19, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Naser Holdings X111 LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003472 City Of Dearborn, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003472 Page 2 of 8 If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or email taxtrib@michigan.gov. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: November 19, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Naser Holdings X111 LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003472 City Of Dearborn, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to
Page 4
M
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
ARCHIVED 6. Assessor Change Reason(s): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 201 (COMMERCIAL-IMPROVED) Email Address: Phone: Name: March Board of Review Appeal Information. The Board of Review will meet at the following dates and times: Questions regarding the Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification may be directed to the Following: Exempt As "Qualified Forest Property": Exempt As "Development Property": THIS IS NOT A TAX BILL X No Yes Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification Michigan Department of Treasury, 1019 (Rev, 11-23) ACCORDING TO MCL 211.34c THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 5. There WAS or WAS NOT a transfer of ownership on this property in The 2024 Inflation rate Multiplier is: 1.05 1. TAXABLE VALUE: DEARBORN, MI 48124 % Exempt As "Qualified Agricultural Property": PARCEL IDENTIFICATION 19,100 452,700 19,100 PROPERTY ADDRESS: No X Yes PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION DEARBORN MI 48124 OWNER'S NAME & ADDRESS/PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: PARCEL NUMBER: This form is issued under the authority of P.A. 206 of 1893, Sec. 211.24 (c) and Sec.211.34c, as amended. This is a model assessment notice to be used by the local assessor. L-4400 FROM CITY OF DEARBORN DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT 16901 MICHIGAN, SUITE 5 DEARBORN, MI 48126 82 09 214 03 006 SINGH HOLDINGS LLC 22600 MICHIGAN 22600 MICHIGAN AVE 201 (COMMERCIAL-IMPROVED) PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION IF DIFFERENT: CURRENT TENTATIVE AMOUNT YEAR: PRIOR AMOUNT YEAR: CHANGE FROM PRIOR YEAR TO CURRENT YEAR 2023 2024 433,600 452,700 19,100 2. ASSESSED VALUE: 452,700 433,600 3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 1.000 4. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV): 433,600 WAS NOT 2023 % Exempt As "Homeowners Principal Residence": .00% % Exempt As "MBT Industrial Personal": .00% .00% % Exempt As "MBT Commercial Personal": .00% TO APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD OF REVIEW FOR A FORMAL APPEAL, PLEASE CALL THE DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT AT (313) 943-2140 FOR AN APPOINTMENT. AGENTS OF PROPERTY OWNERS NEED TO SUBMIT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. THE DEARBORN BOARD OF REVIEW WILL CONVENE TO HEAR APPEALS IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, DEARBORN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER, 16901 MICHIGAN AVENUE, DEARBORN, MICHIGAN AS FOLLOWS: MARCH 11 9:00 AM – 12:00 PM & 1:00 PM – 4:00 PM MARCH 12 9:00 AM – 12:00 PM & 1:00 PM – 4:00 PM MARCH 13 12:00 PM – 4:00 PM MARCH 14 2:00 PM - 5:00 PM & 6:00 PM - 9:00 PM MARCH 15 9:00 AM – 12:00 PM & 1:00 PM – 4:00 PM MARCH 18 9:00 AM – 12:00 PM & 1:00 PM – 4:00 PM MARCH 25 12:00 PM – 4:00 PM - PERSONAL PROPERTY Market Adjustment (313) 943-2140 JACOB THURSTON DEARBORNASSESSORS@DEARBORN.GOV LOTS 1 TO 6 E J HORGER'S SUB
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-003472 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City Of Dearborn (WAYNE) First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Jacob M.I. C Last Name Thurston Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 16901 Michigan Avenue Suite 5 City or Town Dearborn State Michigan ZIP Code 48126 Telephone Number 313-542-4390 Fax Number E-mail Address jthurston@dearborn.gov Section 3: Subject Property Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? No Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. N/A Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Respondent will verify and review all pertinent data as well as provide further evidence, if needed, prior to the hearing. Attachment: 2024 Assessment Change Notice, Petitioner did not appear before the City of Dearborn Board of Review. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? No If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, cite the Board’s authority. Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, explain. Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? If so, what is the issue date? No IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 820921403006 Classification of Property: Real Commercial Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 452700 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 452700 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 905400 Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 452700 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Jacob Thurston
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Naser Holdings X111 LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003472 City Of Dearborn, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent has failed to file an answer. See TTR 279. Respondent must file an answer within 14 days of the entry of this Order. Small Claims answer forms can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this Order.i Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By:_______________________________ Entered: October 30, 2024 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003472 Page 2 of 6 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 219(5)
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Naser Holdings X111 LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003472 City Of Dearborn, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent has failed to file an answer. See TTR 279. Respondent must file an answer within 14 days of the entry of this Order. Small Claims answer forms can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this Order.ii Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By:_______________________________ Entered: October 30, 2024 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 24-003472 Page 4 of 6 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk ii “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service
Page 5
ST
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name MI. Last Name/Company Name Naser Holdings X111 LLC Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information I. First Name Mm. Last Name Sam Miller Firm Name (if any) N PropTax America Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 26923 Havelock City or Town State ZIP Code Dearborn Heights MI 148127 Telephone Number Fax Number 313-377-1447 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) nassco123@yahoo.com Section 3: Subject Property Information How many If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? parcelsareyou | [[] ves [] No* appealing? *If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check
ail that apply)
True Cash and Taxable Value
[0 Poverty Exemption
{ZT} Taxable Value Only (calculation)
[J Disabled Veterans Exemption
71 uncapping of Taxable Value
J Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA)
[J exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a
{J Classification
Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption)
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
SEV is too high
Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
Year(s) you are appealing:
2024
Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [i] Yes
No
if Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: a March
(} July
[I] December
if No, check the applicable reason(s):
Not required to attend
[Hl] Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner
[W] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5)
[Wm] Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission OrderPage 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETGHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
Parcel Identification Number:
82-09-214-03-006
Classification of Property:
Real
Personal
(checkone)
Agricuitural
Commercial
industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
m
Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:
452,700
Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:
452,700
What do you betieve is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?
905,400
Muitiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value,
705,400
if you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.
100,000
Section 8: Classification Information *Only the Mi Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal
Parcel Identification Number:
Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:
Real
Personal
(check one)
|
Agricuitural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
{check one)
What do you believe is the praoperty’s classification?
Reat
Personal
{check one)
O
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
If improved property, how is the property currently being used?
If improved property, for what use was the property designed?Page 4
Hagorett” STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Naser Holdings X111 LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003472 City Of Dearborn, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: September 17, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Naser Holdings X111 LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003472 City Of Dearborn, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: September 17, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name MI. Last Name/Company Name Naser Holdings X111 LLC Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information I. First Name Mm. Last Name Sam Miller Firm Name (if any) N PropTax America Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 26923 Havelock City or Town State ZIP Code Dearborn Heights MI 148127 Telephone Number Fax Number 313-377-1447 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) nassco123@yahoo.com Section 3: Subject Property Information How many If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? parcelsareyou | [[] ves [] No* appealing? *If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check
ail that apply)
True Cash and Taxable Value
[0 Poverty Exemption
{ZT} Taxable Value Only (calculation)
[J Disabled Veterans Exemption
71 uncapping of Taxable Value
J Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA)
[J exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a
{J Classification
Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption)
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
SEV is too high
Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
Year(s) you are appealing:
2024
Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [i] Yes
No
if Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: a March
(} July
[I] December
if No, check the applicable reason(s):
Not required to attend
[Hl] Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner
[W] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5)
[Wm] Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission OrderPage 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETGHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
Parcel Identification Number:
82-09-214-03-006
Classification of Property:
Real
Personal
(checkone)
Agricuitural
Commercial
industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
m
Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:
452,700
Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:
452,700
What do you betieve is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?
905,400
Muitiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value,
705,400
if you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.
100,000
Section 8: Classification Information *Only the Mi Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal
Parcel Identification Number:
Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:
Real
Personal
(check one)
|
Agricuitural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
{check one)
What do you believe is the praoperty’s classification?
Reat
Personal
{check one)
O
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
If improved property, how is the property currently being used?
If improved property, for what use was the property designed?Page 4
Hagorett” STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.