Mazin Yonin, Besma Askar, Petitioners V Township Of West Bloomfield, Respondent

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Mazin Yonin, Besma Askar, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioners, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003826 

 

West Bloomfield Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioners were placed 

in default on October 16, 2024, because they filed the wrong Small Claims petition. On 

November 15, 2024, the Tribunal extended the time for Petitioners to cure the default by 

an additional 14 days and they have failed to respond. Petitioners have not complied 

with either order, and the latter stated that “failure to comply with this Order shall result 

in the dismissal of the case . . .” and referenced Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury.1 In Grimm, 

the Michigan Court of Appeals summarized factors that the Tribunal should consider 

before imposing the sanction of dismissal. Those factors are: 

 

(1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of 

refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the 

opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) 

the degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) 

attempts to cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better 

serve the interests of justice.2 

 

Here, Petitioners’ failure to comply with multiple orders has established a history of 

deliberate delay. As a result, giving careful consideration to the factors involved and 

considering all options in determining what sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal 

finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser sanction would not be appropriate in 

light of Petitioners’ history of noncompliance in this case. 

 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

 

This Order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 

 

 

 

1 Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

2 Id. at 149.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003826 

Page 2 of 2 

 

APPEAL RIGHTS 

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless 

the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a 

principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the 

decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, 

if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the 

opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to 

electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the 

motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral 

arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. 

 

Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the 

claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If 

the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal 

by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the 

record on appeal. There is no certification fee. 

 

 

Entered: December 12, 2024 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

bw/jcr 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Mazin Yonin,Besma Askar,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003826

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003826

Page 2 of 6

If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or 

email taxtrib@michigan.gov.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: December 3, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Mazin Yonin,Besma Askar,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003826

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit

Page 4

MTT

Page 5

S

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

Charter Township of 

est SBloomield 

RECEIVED 

Assessing Department 

HOV 0 g 2024 

“(248) 451-4850 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

October 31, 2024 

Paul ONeill 

Michigan Property Tax Attorneys, PC 

74 W Long Lake Rd, Suite 101 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304 

Re: 

MTT Docket: 24-003826 

Parcel ID: 18-12-451-007 

Property Address: 3424 Pine Estates 

Property Owners: Mazin Yonin 

Besma Askar 

Greetings, 

Enclosed please find your copy of our Answer Form that has been filed with the Michigan Tax 

Tribunal in regards to your Appeal. This copy is for your files. 

Sincerely yours, 

Erin Luke 

West Bloomfield Township Assessing Department 

Enclosures 

PROOF OF SERVICE

Page 2

\ 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

MTT DOCKET NO. 24-003826 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

First Name: 

M.L: 

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government: 

Robert Scripture 

Charter Township of West Bloomfield 

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

County: 

4550 Walnut Lake Rd 

Oakland 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

West Bloomfield 

Mi 

48323 

Fax Number: 

Telephone Number: 

248-451-4850 

248-451-4787 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

taxtribunal@wbtownship.org 

Section 2: Respondent's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

M.L: 

Last Name: 

Scripture 

First Name: 

Robert 

Firm Name (if any); 

Charter Township of West Bloomfield 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

4550 Walnut Lake Rd. 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

West Bloomfield 

Mi 

48323 

Fax Number: 

Telephone Number: 

248-451-4850 

248-451-4787 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

taxtribunal@wbtownship.org 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

[Hl] Yes 

4 No 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

if not, list which parcels adjoin one another. 

[ves 

[No 

[/ NotApplicable

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

The respondent will prepare a Valuation Disclosure and may conduct a site inspection prior to hearing. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER 1S APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

Yes 

[wm] No 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: vi} March 

[Ml] July 

[i] December 

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? [| Yes 

[| No 

*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [mm] Yes 

[HI] No 

If yes, cite the Board's authority. 

Was the assessment(s} at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [| Yes 

[w] No 

If yes, explain 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

[] Yes 

4 No 

if so, what is the issue date?

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption ata BOR? [] Yes 

[No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [_] March 

[J July 

[] December 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner's Poverty Exemption: 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS 

Did Petitioner request the exemption at 

a BOR? [Hl] Yes 

[Hl] No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: Oa March 

O July 

O December 

Tax Year(s) denied: 

List the date the exemption was denied: 

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY 

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

a 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Section 6: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

18-12-451-007 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

866,860 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

740,356 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

1,733,720 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

866,860 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Page 5

= KCI 

West Bloomfield Township - Assessor 

i 

4550 Walnut Lake Rd 

FER» 

West Bloomfield, MI 48323 

= 

Sworn Statement of Mailing 

February 15, 2024 

To whom this may concern: 

Please take this documentation as proof of mailing your 2024 Assessment Notices 

On February 15, 2024 Kent Communications, Inc. mailed West Bloomfield Township's 2024 

Assessment Notices, 

KCI mailed a total quantity of 24,838 “2024 Assessment Notices”. 

See enclosed PS Form 3600-R and invoice #331929 for supporting documentation. 

Sincerely, 

Sougploll Whpaal 

Joseph V. Wujkowski 

Kent Communications, Inc. 

Owner / CEO

Page 6

** Notice of March Board of Review Decision ** 

FROM 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WEST BLOOMFIELD 

(248) 451-4850 

03/22/2024 

BOARD OF REVIEW 

' 4550 WALNUT LAKE ROAD 

WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48323 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

YONIN, MAZIN & ASKAR, BESMA 

PROPERTY 

1971 DELL ROSE 

IDENTIFICATION: 

BLOOMFIELD HILLS M} 48302 

X -16-12-451-007 

SCHOOL

Page 7

1

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Mazin Yonin,Besma Askar, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003826 

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT 

The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that it 

entered an order holding Petitioner in default on October 16, 2024.1 Petitioner was 

required to cure the default within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet 

has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an 

extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with 

Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of 

deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with 

this Order.2 Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the 

default: (1) file the documentation and/or petition filing fee required by the October 16, 

2024 default order, (2) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, (3) pay the $25.00 Motion fee, 

and (4) file proof the Motion and a copy of the documentation and/or petition filing fee 

were served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 

days of the entry of this Order.

Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the case, as provided by 

TTR 231.3 

By:___________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: November 15, 2024

1 The Order further stated, “Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being 

required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 

2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

3 See also MCL 205.732.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003826

Page 2 of 6

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Mazin Yonin,Besma Askar, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003826 

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT 

The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that it 

entered an order holding Petitioner in default on October 16, 2024.4 Petitioner was 

required to cure the default within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet 

has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an 

extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with 

Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of 

deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with 

this Order.5 Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the 

default: (1) file the documentation and/or petition filing fee required by the October 16, 

2024 default order, (2) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, (3) pay the $25.00 Motion fee, 

and (4) file proof the Motion and a copy of the documentation and/or petition filing fee 

were served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 

days of the entry of this Order.

Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the case, as provided by 

TTR 231.6 

By:___________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: November 15, 2024

4 The Order further stated, “Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being 

required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 

5 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

6 See also MCL 205.732.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 24-003826

Page 4 of 6

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Mazin Yonin,Besma Askar, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003826 

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT 

The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that it 

entered an order holding Petitioner in default on October 16, 2024.7 Petitioner was 

required to cure the default within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet 

has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an 

extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with 

Tribunal orders and its Rules of

Page 6

MTT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Mazin Yonin,Besma Askar,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003826

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner failed to file an updated Tribunal petition form. As such, the petition is not 

properly pending. Petitioner must complete and return a current petition form within 14 

days of the entry of this Order. The petition shall note the docket number assigned by 

the Tribunal and if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed on the 

assigned docket number as an “Amended Petition.” Small Claims petition forms can be 

found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this Order.i 

Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: October 16, 2024

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003826

Page 2 of 4

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 219(5)

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Mazin Yonin,Besma Askar,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003826

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner failed to file an updated Tribunal petition form. As such, the petition is not 

properly pending. Petitioner must complete and return a current petition form within 14 

days of the entry of this Order. The petition shall note the docket number assigned by 

the Tribunal and if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed on the 

assigned docket number as an “Amended Petition.” Small Claims petition forms can be 

found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this Order.ii 

Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: October 16, 2024

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 24-003826

Page 4 of 4

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

ii “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 219(5)

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

haa 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

Tranlnfo:de06 

D576 

p— 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS. 

1030 

yt: $70). 

AN TAX TRIBUNAL 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

[y= 

alll 

1 (NEILL FLL 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

) 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION APPEAL 

MTT DOCKET NO. 

Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information 

First Name/Company Name 

M.l. 

Last Name 

Yonin & Besma 

Mazin & Askar 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address 

Section 2: Petitioner's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

M.LL 

Last Name 

Paul 

O'Neill 

Firm Name (if any) 

Michigan Property Tax Attorneys, P.C. 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

74 West Long Lake Rd., Suite 101 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Bloomfield Hills 

Mi 

48304-2770 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

(248) 546-7600 

(248) 546-1668 

E-mail Address 

paul@mipropertytaxattorneys.com 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you appealing? 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or 

adjoining? 

BB Yes OJ No *If no, you must file separate appeals for each non- 

contiguous or non-adjoining parcel. 

*Please use the attached multiple parcel form for information regarding 

any continguous parcels.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing 

(check all that apply) 

SB True Cash and Taxable Value 

0 Taxable Value Only {calculation} 

[3 Uncapping of Taxable Value 

[J 

Exemption from Taxation {other than the denial of a principai residence or qualified agricultural exemption) 

DO 

Classification 

BE) 

Poverty Exemption 

Section 5: Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

50% of the True Cash Value is less than the State Equalized Value and Taxable Value. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? 

Byes 

Ovo 

If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: 

 EMarch 

Duly 

 EDecember 

If No, please check the applicable reason(s): 

OJ Assessment Change Notice was not properly sent to Petitioner 

0 Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact 

£3 Appealing within 35 days of July or December Board of Review Decision 

0 Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 

£3 Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping 

Did you request a poverty exemption at the Board of Review? 

DYes 

WNo 

If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: 

[March 

uly 

December

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

Section 7: Valuation Information* 

Parcel Number: 

X-18-12-451-007 

Classification of Property: Realll 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural @ Commercial 

EO 

Industrial 

[J Residential B 

Timber-Cutover 0 

Developmental 

[J Utility 

O 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 

$877,880 

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 

$751,156 

What do you believe is the fair market value? 

$1,001,541 

What do you believe is the taxable value? 

$500,771 

*If you are appealing multiple parcels, fill the multiple parcel form information for each contiguous parcel. Please attach 

the completed multiple parcel form(s) to the completed petition form prior to submission. 

Signature: 

Petitioner's Signature: 

Attorney or Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

Fee Information: 

If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing 

fee for the filing of this appeal. 

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, 

the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will 

be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee od $1,000. 

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$125.00 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

$Over $500,000.00 

$300.00 

If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00

Page 4

** Notice of March Board of Review Decision ** 

FROM 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WEST BLOOMFIELD 

(248) 451-4850 

03/22/2024 

BOARD OF REVIEW 

4550 WALNUT LAKE ROAD 

WEST BLOOMFIELD, Mi 48323 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

YONIN, MAZIN & ASKAR, BESMA 

PROPERTY 

1971 DELL ROSE 

py 

i 

IDENTIFICATION: 

BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI 48302 

X -18-12-451-007 

SCHOOL DISTRICT: 

BLOOMFIELD HILLS SCHOOL DIST 

PROPERTY ADDRESS: 

3424 PINE ESTATES 

est Bloemiield Aas 

THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) 

PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION IF DIFFERENT: 

402 

(RESIDENTIAL-VACANT) 

HOMESTEAD PERCENT: 

0% 

The Board of Review has examined your 2024 Assessed Value and/or Capped Value and has made the following decision. 

PETITION NUMBER: 

53 

DATE: 

03/12/2024 

CHANGE REASON: Assessor Carrection 

FROM 

To 

CHANGE 

1. ASSESSED VALUE 

877.660 

866,860 

-10,800 

2, CAPPED VALUE 

751,156 

740,356 

-10,800 

3. TAXABLE VALUE 

751,166 

740,356 

-10,800 

4. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 

1.000 

. 

5. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE: 

877,660 

| 

866,860 

| 

-10,800 

6. There WAS/WAS NOT a transfer of ownership on this property in 

2023 

: 

WAS NOT 

if there was a transfer of ownership on your property in 2023, your 2024 Taxable Value will be the same as your 2024 State 

Equalized Value. 

If there was not a

Page 5

PROPERTY

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Mazin Yonin,Besma Askar,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003826

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: October 16, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Mazin Yonin,Besma Askar,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003826

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: October 16, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

haa 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

Tranlnfo:de06 

D576 

p— 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS. 

1030 

yt: $70). 

AN TAX TRIBUNAL 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

[y= 

alll 

1 (NEILL FLL 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

) 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION APPEAL 

MTT DOCKET NO. 

Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information 

First Name/Company Name 

M.l. 

Last Name 

Yonin & Besma 

Mazin & Askar 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address 

Section 2: Petitioner's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

M.LL 

Last Name 

Paul 

O'Neill 

Firm Name (if any) 

Michigan Property Tax Attorneys, P.C. 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

74 West Long Lake Rd., Suite 101 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Bloomfield Hills 

Mi 

48304-2770 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

(248) 546-7600 

(248) 546-1668 

E-mail Address 

paul@mipropertytaxattorneys.com 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you appealing? 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or 

adjoining? 

BB Yes OJ No *If no, you must file separate appeals for each non- 

contiguous or non-adjoining parcel. 

*Please use the attached multiple parcel form for information regarding 

any continguous parcels.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing 

(check all that apply) 

SB True Cash and Taxable Value 

0 Taxable Value Only {calculation} 

[3 Uncapping of Taxable Value 

[J 

Exemption from Taxation {other than the denial of a principai residence or qualified agricultural exemption) 

DO 

Classification 

BE) 

Poverty Exemption 

Section 5: Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

50% of the True Cash Value is less than the State Equalized Value and Taxable Value. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? 

Byes 

Ovo 

If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: 

 EMarch 

Duly 

 EDecember 

If No, please check the applicable reason(s): 

OJ Assessment Change Notice was not properly sent to Petitioner 

0 Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact 

£3 Appealing within 35 days of July or December Board of Review Decision 

0 Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 

£3 Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping 

Did you request a poverty exemption at the Board of Review? 

DYes 

WNo 

If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: 

[March 

uly 

December

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

Section 7: Valuation Information* 

Parcel Number: 

X-18-12-451-007 

Classification of Property: Realll 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural @ Commercial 

EO 

Industrial 

[J Residential B 

Timber-Cutover 0 

Developmental 

[J Utility 

O 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 

$877,880 

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 

$751,156 

What do you believe is the fair market value? 

$1,001,541 

What do you believe is the taxable value? 

$500,771 

*If you are appealing multiple parcels, fill the multiple parcel form information for each contiguous parcel. Please attach 

the completed multiple parcel form(s) to the completed petition form prior to submission. 

Signature: 

Petitioner's Signature: 

Attorney or Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

Fee Information: 

If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing 

fee for the filing of this appeal. 

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, 

the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will 

be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee od $1,000. 

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$125.00 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

$Over $500,000.00 

$300.00 

If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00

Page 4

** Notice of March Board of Review Decision ** 

FROM 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WEST BLOOMFIELD 

(248) 451-4850 

03/22/2024 

BOARD OF REVIEW 

4550 WALNUT LAKE ROAD 

WEST BLOOMFIELD, Mi 48323 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

YONIN, MAZIN & ASKAR, BESMA 

PROPERTY 

1971 DELL ROSE 

py 

i 

IDENTIFICATION: 

BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI 48302 

X -18-12-451-007 

SCHOOL DISTRICT: 

BLOOMFIELD HILLS SCHOOL DIST 

PROPERTY ADDRESS: 

3424 PINE ESTATES 

est Bloemiield Aas 

THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) 

PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION IF DIFFERENT: 

402 

(RESIDENTIAL-VACANT) 

HOMESTEAD PERCENT: 

0% 

The Board of Review has examined your 2024 Assessed Value and/or Capped Value and has made the following decision. 

PETITION NUMBER: 

53 

DATE: 

03/12/2024 

CHANGE REASON: Assessor Carrection 

FROM 

To 

CHANGE 

1. ASSESSED VALUE 

877.660 

866,860 

-10,800 

2, CAPPED VALUE 

751,156 

740,356 

-10,800 

3. TAXABLE VALUE 

751,166 

740,356 

-10,800 

4. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 

1.000 

. 

5. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE: 

877,660 

| 

866,860 

| 

-10,800 

6. There WAS/WAS NOT a transfer of ownership on this property in 

2023 

: 

WAS NOT 

if there was a transfer of ownership on your property in 2023, your 2024 Taxable Value will be the same as your 2024 State 

Equalized Value. 

If there was not a

Page 5

PROPERTY

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.