Record Finder / 24-003828-TT
Michigan

Majed Brikho, Petitioner V Township Of West Bloomfield, Respondent

Petitioner
Majed Brikho
Respondent
Township Of West Bloomfield

Case overview

Docket number
24-003828-TT
Status
Disposed
CaseType
SC Property
Division
Small Claims Division
County
Oakland
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
12Order of DismissalNot recordedNot recorded02/25/2026Not recordedDownload
11Order Holding Party in DefaultNot recordedNot recorded02/04/2026Not recordedDownload
10Failed to Appear - PetitionerNot recordedNot recorded02/04/2026Not recordedNot recorded
9Proof of Service of Misc Documents was received.RESPNot recorded01/14/2026Not recordedDownload
8Valuation DisclosureRESPNot recorded01/14/2026Not recordedDownload
7Notice of HearingNot recordedNot recorded11/17/2025Not recordedDownload
6A hearing has been scheduledNot recordedNot recorded11/17/2025Not recordedNot recorded
5Answer was receivedRESPNot recorded10/31/2024Not recordedDownload
4Notice of FilingNot recordedNot recorded12/03/2024Not recordedDownload
3Petition has been verifiedPET110/16/2024Not recordedDownload
2Notice of Docket Number SCNot recordedNot recorded10/16/2024Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded07/31/2024$125.00Download

Documents

Order_of_Dismissal-FTA.2026-02-25_15-38-19.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Majed Brikho, 

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

MTT Docket No.24-003828

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that 

Petitioner was placed in default on February 4, 2026, for failing to appear at a duly-

scheduled hearing. Even though Petitioner failed to comply with the order, the Tribunal 

must consider Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury1 prior to the dismissal of this case. In Grimm, 

the Michigan Court of Appeals summarized factors that the Tribunal must consider 

before imposing the sanction of dismissal. Those factors are:

(1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of 

refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the 

opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) 

the degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) 

attempts to cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better 

serve the interests of justice.2 

Petitioner’s failure to appear at the hearing and failure to comply with the Order of 

Default has established a history of deliberate delay. As a result, giving careful 

consideration to the factors involved and considering all options in determining what 

sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser 

sanction would not be appropriate. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

This order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case.

1 Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).

2 Id. at 149.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003828

Page 2 of 4

APPEAL RIGHTS

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless 

the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a 

principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the 

decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, 

if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the 

opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to 

electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the 

motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral 

arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal.

Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the 

claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If 

the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal 

by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the 

record on appeal. There is no certification fee. 

By:___________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: February 25, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Majed Brikho, 

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

MTT Docket No.24-003828

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that 

Petitioner was placed in default on February 4, 2026, for failing to appear at a duly-

scheduled hearing. Even though Petitioner failed to comply with the order, the Tribunal 

must consider Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury3 prior to the dismissal of this case. In Grimm, 

the Michigan Court of Appeals summarized factors that the Tribunal must consider 

before imposing the sanction of dismissal. Those factors are:

(1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of 

refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the 

opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) 

the degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) 

attempts to cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better 

serve the interests of justice.4 

Petitioner’s failure to appear at the hearing and failure to comply with the Order of 

Default has established a history of deliberate delay. As a result, giving careful 

consideration to the factors involved and considering all options in determining what 

sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser 

sanction would not be appropriate. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

This order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case.

3 Grimm

Page 4

MT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Order_of_Default_-_FTA.2026-02-04_15-34-48.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Majed Brikho,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

MTT Docket No. 24-003828

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that Petitioner failed to appear 

for the duly-noticed hearing scheduled for February 4, 2026. Thus, this case is subject 

to dismissal or a default hearing.1 Prior to dismissal or the scheduling of a default 

hearing, however, the Tribunal finds that placing the absent party in default and ordering 

an explanation and documentation justifying the absence at the proceeding is 

appropriate.2 Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the absent party is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall submit information and 

documentation as directed above. The response must be filed with the Tribunal and 

served on the opposing party or the opposing party’s authorized representative within 

14 days of entry of this order.3 

Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this case or the scheduling of 

a default hearing, as provided by TTR 237.

By______________________________

Entered: February 4, 2026

 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

1 See TTR 247 & TTR 275.

2 See TTR 231 and See Grimm v Department of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).

3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003828 

Page 2 of 4

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Majed Brikho,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

MTT Docket No. 24-003828

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that Petitioner failed to appear 

for the duly-noticed hearing scheduled for February 4, 2026. Thus, this case is subject 

to dismissal or a default hearing.4 Prior to dismissal or the scheduling of a default 

hearing, however, the Tribunal finds that placing the absent party in default and ordering 

an explanation and documentation justifying the absence at the proceeding is 

appropriate.5 Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the absent party is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall submit information and 

documentation as directed above. The response must be filed with the Tribunal and 

served on the opposing party or the opposing party’s authorized representative within 

14 days of entry of this order.6 

Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this case or the scheduling of 

a default hearing, as provided by TTR 237.

By______________________________

Entered: February 4, 2026

 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

4 See TTR 247 & TTR 275.

5 See TTR 231 and See Grimm v Department of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).

6 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 24-003828 

Page 4 of 4

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Proof of Service - Docket #24-003828 - BRIKHO.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

MTT Docket No. 

Respondent(s) 

_________________________________________ 

[Signature of person who is serving/mailing copy] 

_________________________________________ 

[Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy] 

24-003828

_____________________________,

Majed Brikho

 

 

Petitioner(s)

v

_____________________________,

Township of West Bloomfield, Oakland County

PROOF OF SERVICE

___________________________________ states that on ___________________ he/she

Erin Lamb

 

January 14, 2026

[Name of person serving/mailing petition] 

 

 

 

[date of service]

served a copy of the ___________________ relative to the above-captioned matter upon:

Valuation Disclosure

[Provide name and address of the party/people being served]

________________________________________________

Sam Miller

PropTax America

Erin Lamb

26926 Havelock

Dearborn Heights, MI 48127

nassco123@yahoo.com

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Valuation Disclosure - Docket #24-003828 - BRIKHO.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

VALUATION DISCLOSURE 

FOR PROCEEDINGS AT THE 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

MTT Docket No: 

24-003828 

Tax ID: 

18-31-201-001 

Petitioner: 

Majed Brikho 

7405 W Maple 

West Bloomfield MI 48322 

Agent: 

Sam Miller 

Proptax America 

26926 Havelock 

Dearborn Heights MI 48127 

Respondent: 

Charter Township of West Bloomfield 

4550 Walnut Lake Road 

West Bloomfield, MI 48323 

Appeal Year: 

December 31, 2023 for 2024 Tax Year 

December 31, 2024 for 2025 Tax Year 

Daniel L. Sears, Chief Appraiser 

a 

NSA 

CA 

Prepared by: 

obert Scripture, Assessor 

AngéTa ¢ Skiver, Chief Appraiser 

Keith Hartman, Property Appraiser

Page 2

2

Table of Contents 

 

 

 

Cover Letter .............................................................................................. 1 

 

Table of Contents ...................................................................................... 2 

 

Master Letter ............................................................................................ 3 

 

Township Map ........................................................................................... 4 

 

Subject Photographs .................................................................................. 5 

 

Subject Aerial Map ..................................................................................... 6 

 

Subject Record Cards.............................................................................. 7-8 

 

Valuation Report................................................................................... 9-10 

 

Price Per Square Foot Analysis ................................................................. 11 

 

Subject and Comparable Map ................................................................... 12 

 

File Maintenance Records ......................................................................... 13 

 

Scope of Work and Certification ................................................................ 14 

 

Appraiser’s Qualifications .....................................................................15-18 

 

Addendum .............................................................................................. 19 

 

Pictures and Maps of Comparables .......................................................20-31 

 

Realcomp Listing ..................................................................................... 32

Page 3

Charter Township of 

ONst SSloomfeld 

Assessing Depirtment 

(248) 451-4850 

January 14, 2026 

Chief Clerk 

Michigan State Tax Tribunal 

P.O. Box 30232 

Lansing, Michigan 48909 

RE: 

Address: 7405 W Maple 

Property Tax ID: X-18-31-201-001 

MTT Docket No: 24-003828 

Dear Sir/Madam: 

Please find enclosed the valuation disclosure for the subject property listed above (vacant land). We set 

the Assessment utilizing Mass Appraisal. 

For appeal purposes, the property is valued on an individual 

basis with a price per square foot approach. 

The ‘original’ Assessed Value, True Cash Value, and Taxable Value for the year at issue are: 

Tax Day 

Tax Year 

TCV 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

12/31/2023 

2024 

244,240 

122,120 

122,120 

12/31/2024 

2025 

244,240 

122,120 

122,120 

The Michigan Tax Tribunal makes an independent determination of value based on all the evidence 

available. This valuation disclosure concludes the following values: 

Tax Day 

Tax Year 

TCV 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

12/31/2023 

2024 

272,460 

136,230 

122,120 

12/31/2024 

2025 

272,460 

136,230 

122,120 

py 

“ed \ Haw 

Robert Scripture, Assessor 

Daniel L. Sears, Chief Appraiser 

ev SE JANE 

J 

ngela Skiver, Chief Appraiser 

Keith Hartman, Property Appraiser 

4550 Walnut Lake Roacl 

» 

West Bloomfield, MI 48325-0130 

Fi 

ww np west-bloomfield. mis 

+ 

Fax (248) 682-7851 

| 

| 

I

Page 4

4

TOWNSHIP MAP 

 

TOWNSHIP MAP 

LJ 

—t— 

| 

4 

- 

| 

1 | 

IL 

: 

nd 

: 

Sk 

x 

od 

: 

" 

| 

{ 

i 

wm—— 

\ 

a 

| 

—, 

\ 

—- 

2 

= 

r~ 

ol 

a 

-_ 

13 

0 

- 

1 

S 

a 

| 

co 

2] 

IRN 

b 

rt 

Any 

Ye 

y 

- 

al 

~~ 

I 

La 

| 

i 

- 

SAN 

i 

pf 

/ 

pe 

k 

p= 

o 

- 

> 

ol 

/ 

'] 

: 

T 

- 

— 

-- 

- 

— 

2 

ok 

{ 

3 

io 

v 

~ 

Tid 

i 

- 

af 

5 

J 

: 

ff 

is 

al 

—— 

= 

ha 

(8 

1 

Hem "i 

* 

= 

=, 

N 

. 

». 

I 

pai 

Cae 

2) 

|

Page 5

5

7405 W Maple-Photo-Vacant Land 

 

Photo-Vacant Land 

7405 W Maple-

Page 6

6

7405 W Maple-Aerial Map 

 

3% 

BR 

. 

2 — 

2 

~ 

- 

S3UYISI NY ew 

iw 

= 

iy 

- 

TT 

aon 

pal 

peg 

pees 

wn

Page 7

7

2024 Record Card 

 

2024 Record Card 

»++P333usIEN6 30U INQ STQETTSI PSWSSP UTSISY UOTIFWIOIUL mae 

uebTYSTH ‘PuETA=C 30 A3umod| 

D06€ ‘ZIT 

HOZT ‘z2T 

|ozT’zZT 

0 

lozT’zZT 

| 

tzoz] E—— 

73 

E 

B 

B 

I 

7 

I 

| TIDFI 

‘praTIwooTg 353M JO 

dTYSUMOL OL PSSUsDTT 

2060°3TT 

|ozT zET 

0 

loz z2T 

| 

2202) 1ooyasares 

77 

Raa RE a du 

ov68°T2T 

| ZoZT’Zel 

|oz1‘zET 

[4 

lozT’zET 

| 

ezoz] 

28430 0002/10/60 OT 

: 

a 

S021 ‘ZZT 

HOZT ‘Z2T 

lozT’zZT 

[1 

lozT’zET 

| 

pzoz 

3Eum 

uzun 

oum 

anTEp 

| z3u30 

msTASY 

anTEp 

ante 

|snTEp 

| 

sTqexel 

| /TeunqrIl 

[Jo pIEog 

pessassy 

ButprTng 

|pusT 

TEX 

uTeTd POOTI 

SSE 

- 

aa 

od 

1 

PuETIaM 

suta®y 

JUOIIIITEM 

puog 

p3pooy 

dusmg 

padeospueT 

H 

a 

ERE 

bi 

a 

WOEW ® spew osTE ssnods-xa ‘pTOS 

so 

usaq psy A33x3dozd sssappe SuTrTTEWw yl 

Pa—— 

ssnenaq psbueys sseIppE SUTTTEW pasuEs 

Tens 

x 

‘zsumoswoy 103 yIomiaded TT® PTP PSWTETD 

— 

ous ssnods-xs sxsuMo 03 sxods T1Z/BT/Z0 

Mid 

WY 

WYER 

30 Audezbodol | 

yaw wove MOWED ‘OI ‘IONVED ON 12/62/11 

[1] 

= anTE) YSE) InIL squswanoIdu] PUET PIITWTIASE TE20L 

“STT3N punozbaapun| 

, 

. 

SY £20Z ¥2®q 

[1] 

18 

+3 

00°0 

-2uo) /udsy/AEMsATIq 

S3TITTT3Q PITPUElS 

yosy> 

‘sozouyd peiepdn 

‘sbueyd ON zZ/ZZT/IT 

sntep ysed 

pooy 

§ °z15 

samy 

uoradransag 

sauybTT 399135 

733 - sssappe Aazadozd 03 PATTER 

(s)meal soe uT aTun 

qm) 

“PSUINIST SITIO IUSWSESSSY - £2/1Z/2Z 

snTeEp Ysed 

poo 

§ 9ZTS 

EEL 

uotadrIdsag 

589 

uv 

se3eWT3sY 250) JuswenoIdm] pum 

212308713 

1TA¥Ed 3SOTO ‘DId “SONVED ON £Z/¥T/TT 

| 

I3M35 

TYE 

- I23uUncO 

3® 3s3nbaz Isumo 

1 

338M 

73d ss37ppe SurTrew padspdn - $Z/IE/T. 

OFZ ‘BHT 

= SnTEA pul 

"35F TE3IOL 

$8I0Y TE30L 6€°T 

‘3933 

3uUOI3 TEN3IDY 

T 

ITEMSPTS

Page 8

8

Page 9

9

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC_Notice_of_Telephonic_Hearing.2025-11-17_14-48-29.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Majed Brikho,

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

MTT Docket No.: 24-003828

Township Of West Bloomfield, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF TELEPHONE HEARING

The Tribunal has scheduled a telephone hearing to be conducted as follows. Hearings are 

generally 30 minutes in length. 

HEARING DATE:

February 4, 2026 

HEARING TIME:

2:30 PM EST

JOIN BY PHONE:

1-248-509-0316

ACCESS CODE:

425208668 

 

This hearing will be held by telephone conference call with the Judge as the host. In order to join 

the hearing, call the phone number listed above at least 5 minutes prior to the hearing time. You 

will then be required to input the access code, followed by # to connect. The Tribunal judge will call 

in and join by phone at the hearing time. Failure to timely call in may result in the placement of a 

party or parties in default.

This is an important legal document. Please have someone translate the document.

Este es un documento legal importante. Por favor, haga traducir este documento.

এটি একটি গুরুত্বপূর্ণ আইনি দলিল, অনুগ্রহ করে কেউ দলিলটিকে অনুবাদ করুন।

.ةقيثولا مجرتت صخش كيدل ىجري ةماه ةينوناق ةقيثو وه اذه

Ito ay isang mahalagang legal na dokumento. Mangyari lamang na magkaroon ng isang tao isalin ang 

dokumento.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003828

Page 2 of 12

HEARING INFORMATION – PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY

GENERAL INFORMATION: An impartial hearing will be conducted in accordance with the Michigan Tax 

Tribunal Rules (R 792.10201-R 792.10297) and the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act, MCL 24.201 et 

seq. The Michigan Rules of Evidence and the Michigan Court Rules may be applicable. Parties are expected 

to exercise proper respect and courtesy toward other parties, witnesses, and administrative law judges, which 

includes attending the hearing on time, silencing cell phones, and choosing a quiet, private location to 

participate in the hearing to limit distractions and ensure minimal background noise. The hearing may be 

recorded for notetaking purposes, but the recording is not a formal record, unless otherwise provided for by the 

Tribunal.

REPRESENTATION: You may have an attorney or anyone else of your choice represent you at the hearing. 

The Tribunal does not recommend or appoint representatives for you and will not pay for your representative.

WITNESSES: You may have anyone join you at the hearing to speak in support of your case. However, the 

time to present your case is limited and additional time may not be provided to accommodate witness 

testimony.

DOCUMENTATION: Parties are required to submit all documents in support of their contentions to both the 

Tribunal and the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents were 

previously submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the 

documents are not timely submitted to both the Tribunal and the opposing party, the documents may be 

excluded. Documents may be submitted to the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s electronic filing (e-

filing) system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to 

submission by e-mail. If sent by mail, the documents must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized 

representative at the address identified in the petition or answer for that party or authorized representative, 

unless the party or authorized representative filed an appearance or other documentation identifying a different 

mailing address. The documents do not need to be resubmitted after the Notice of Hearing if they were 

previously submitted to the Tribunal and the opposing party in this case.

If a hearing had previously been scheduled in this case and adjourned, and the adjournment order indicates 

that the parties are precluded from submitting any further documentary evidence, no further documentary 

evidence will be accepted even if filed and exchanged as indicated above.

INCLUSION OF SUBSEQUENT TAX YEARS: Subsequent tax year assessments are automatically included 

in valuation appeals once the assessment has been established for that tax year. For purposes of 

administrative efficiency, the Tribunal considers this date April 1st. As such, the parties should submit 

documentation and be prepared to discuss subsequent tax year assessments at hearings to be conducted on 

or after April 1st in a subsequent year. If the hearing is to be conducted prior to April 1st in a subsequent year, 

taxpayers are required to file a new petition and, if necessary, protest the subsequent tax year assessment at 

the March Board of Review for that year. 

MOTIONS/REQUESTS: A motion is a written request filed by a party asking the Tribunal to take certain action. 

The following motions and requests may be filed by either party regarding the scheduled hearing. Motions and 

requests may be submitted to the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Motions and 

requests may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to submission by e-mail. If 

sent by mail, motions and requests must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized representative at the 

address identified in the petition or answer for that party or authorized representative, unless the party or 

authorized representative filed an appearance or other documentation identifying a different mailing address. 

1. Motion to Adjourn: Parties may request the hearing be rescheduled (i.e. adjourned). The motion must be 

submitted to both the Tribunal and the opposing party at least 28 days before the hearing unless there are 

emergency circumstances. The emergency circumstances must be detailed to justify the granting of what

Page 3

MTT

Page 4

MTT

Page 5

STA

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

Charter Township of 

| 

est Shloomyfield 

Assessing Department 

(248) 451-4850 

VED 

October 31, 2024 

RECE 

3 

NOV 06 202 

\R 

TRIBUNA 

Sam Miller 

MICHIGAN Aas 

PropTax America 

26926 Havelock 

Dearborn Heights, MI 48127 

Re: 

MTT Docket: 24-003828 

Parcel ID: 18-31-201-001 

Property Address: 7405 W Maple 

Property Owner: Majed Brikho 

Greetings, 

Enclosed please find your copy of our Answer Form that has been filed with the Michigan Tax 

Tribunal in regards to your Appeal. This copy is for your files. 

Sincerely yours, 

Ln Jude, 

Erin Luke 

West Bloomfield Township Assessing Department 

Enclosures 

PROOF OF SERVICE

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

MTT DOCKET NO. 24-003828 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

First Name: 

ME: 

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government: 

Robert Scripture 

Charter Township of West Bloomfield 

Home Address {No,, Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

County: 

4550 Walnut Lake Rd 

Oakland 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

West Bloomfield 

Mi 

48323 

Telephone Number: 

Fax Number: 

248-451-4850 

248-451-4787 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

taxtribunal@wbtownship.org 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

M.A 

First Name: 

Last Nama: 

Robert 

Scripture 

Firm Name (if any): 

Charter Township of West Bloomfield 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route}: 

4550 Walnut Lake Rd. 

City or Town: 

State; 

ZIP Code: 

West Bloomfield 

Mi 

48323 

Telephone Number: 

Fax Number: 

248-451-4850 

248-451-4787 

E-mail Address {do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

taxtribunal@wbtownship.org 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

0 Yes 

|] No 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

if not, list which parcels adjoin one another. 

[ves 

[no 

[A Notapplicable

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

The respondent will prepare a Valuation Disclosure and may conduct a site inspection prior to hearing. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [wi] Yes 

[mm] No 

if yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [] March 

[J July 

[] December 

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? [| Yes 

[] No 

*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? |_| Yes 

[]No 

If yes, cite the Board's authority. 

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [i] Yes 

[7] No 

i yes, explain 

is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

[| Yes 

[wi] No 

if so, what is the issue date?

Page 4

5] 

y 

“spt 

) 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption ataBOR? [] Yes 

[No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 0 March 

O July 

Oa December 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner's Poverty Exemption: 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS 

Did Petitioner request the exemption ata BOR? [] Yes 

[| No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: Oa March 

O July 

O December 

List the date the exemption was denied: 

Tax Year(s) denied: 

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY 

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Section 6: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

18-31-201-001 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

122,120 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

122,120 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

244,240 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

122,120 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Page 5

2 KCI 

West Bloomfield Township - Assessor 

4550 Walnut Lake Rd 

FER o 

4 

West Bloomfield, MI 48323 

Wes; 

< 2004 

LO 

ASSEg ge MEIEL 

0 

i. 

ERagy, WSL 

Sworn Statement of Mailing 

MEN 

February 15, 2024 

To whom this may concern: 

Please take this documentation as proof of mailing your 2024 Assessment Notices 

On February 15, 2024 Kent Communications, Inc. mailed West Bloomfield Township's 2024 

Assessment Notices, 

KCI mailed a total quantity of 24,838 “2024 Assessment Notices”. 

See enclosed PS Form 3600-R and invoice #331929 for supporting documentation. 

Sincerely, 

Jo ple U Wofpsale 

Joseph V. Wujkowski 

Kent Communications, Inc. 

Owner / CEQ

Page 6

** Notice of March Board of Review Decision ** 

FROM 

. 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WEST BLOOMFIELD 

(248) 451-4850 

03/22/2024 

BOARD OF REVIEW 

4550 WALNUT LAKE ROAD 

WEST BLOOMFIELD, M] 48323 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

BRIKHO, MAJED 

PROPERTY 

6710 MAPLE LAKES 

IDENTIFICATION: 

WEST BLOOMFIELD MI 48322 

X -18-31-201-001

Page 7

10/1

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC-Notice_of_Filing_of_Answer.2024-12-03_14-35-42.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Majed Brikho,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003828

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003828

Page 2 of 6

If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or 

email taxtrib@michigan.gov.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: December 3, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Majed Brikho,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003828

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR

Page 4

MTT

Page 5

STAT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

: 

RECEIVED 

AUG 07 2024 

TranInfo:4é0h 

 2R7676 663-1 

08/02/24 

Chidt: 

1378 

Ant: $125.00 

ID: 

PROPTAX AMERICA (0 

MICHIGAN Tax TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First Name 

M.1. 

Last Name/Company Name 

Majed 

Brikho 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s ARuiAgy Authori250 Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

Last Name 

Sam 

Miller 

Firm Name (if an, 

. 

"“"Proptax America 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

26926 Havelock 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Dearborn Heights 

MI 

148127 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

313-377-1447 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

nassco123@yahoo.com 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

parcelsareyou | [7] vest 

[] No** 

appealing? 

*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Value 

OJ Poverty Exemption 

[1 Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[1 Disabled Veterans Exemption 

[J Uncapping of Taxable Value 

[J Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

[1 exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a 

[1] Classification 

Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

SEV is too high 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Year(s} you are appealing: 

2024 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

Yes 

[mn] No 

if Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: 

March 

O July 

jm] December 

if No, check the applicable reason(s): 

[1] Not required to attend 

0 Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner 

[Hl] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include expianation in Section 5) 

[H| Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order

Page 3

erp” 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information ruse the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

X-18-31-201-001 

Ciassification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricuftural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utllity 

(check one) 

[/ 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

122,120 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

122,120 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

92,000 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here, This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

46,000 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

76,120 

Section 8: Classification Information *Only the Mi Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* 

Parcef Identification Number: 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

What do you belleve is the property’s classification? 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

a 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

if improved property, how Is the property currently being used? 

if improved property, for what use was the property designed?

Page 4

fg 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON i. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Fee Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? 

[mi] Yes 

No 

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 

0 Yes 

0 No 

If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus 

$25.00 will be added for each additional parce! being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. 

if your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention 

is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

$O0ver $500,000.00 

$300.00 

if your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00 

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. 

If your property is 

NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $100,000.01 or

Page 5

**

Page 6

2

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2024-10-16_13-43-12.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Majed Brikho,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003828

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: October 16, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Majed Brikho,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003828

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: October 16, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

: 

RECEIVED 

AUG 07 2024 

TranInfo:4é0h 

 2R7676 663-1 

08/02/24 

Chidt: 

1378 

Ant: $125.00 

ID: 

PROPTAX AMERICA (0 

MICHIGAN Tax TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First Name 

M.1. 

Last Name/Company Name 

Majed 

Brikho 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s ARuiAgy Authori250 Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

Last Name 

Sam 

Miller 

Firm Name (if an, 

. 

"“"Proptax America 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

26926 Havelock 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Dearborn Heights 

MI 

148127 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

313-377-1447 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

nassco123@yahoo.com 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

parcelsareyou | [7] vest 

[] No** 

appealing? 

*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Value 

OJ Poverty Exemption 

[1 Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[1 Disabled Veterans Exemption 

[J Uncapping of Taxable Value 

[J Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

[1 exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a 

[1] Classification 

Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

SEV is too high 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Year(s} you are appealing: 

2024 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

Yes 

[mn] No 

if Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: 

March 

O July 

jm] December 

if No, check the applicable reason(s): 

[1] Not required to attend 

0 Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner 

[Hl] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include expianation in Section 5) 

[H| Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order

Page 3

erp” 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information ruse the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

X-18-31-201-001 

Ciassification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricuftural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utllity 

(check one) 

[/ 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

122,120 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

122,120 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

92,000 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here, This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

46,000 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

76,120 

Section 8: Classification Information *Only the Mi Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* 

Parcef Identification Number: 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

What do you belleve is the property’s classification? 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

a 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

if improved property, how Is the property currently being used? 

if improved property, for what use was the property designed?

Page 4

fg 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON i. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Fee Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? 

[mi] Yes 

No 

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 

0 Yes 

0 No 

If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus 

$25.00 will be added for each additional parce! being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. 

if your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention 

is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

$O0ver $500,000.00 

$300.00 

if your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00 

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. 

If your property is 

NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $100,000.01 or

Page 5

**

Page 6

2

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.