Kevin B Mulherin Petitioner V Township Of North Branch Respondent
- Petitioner
- Kevin B Mulherin
- Respondent
- Township Of North Branch
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-002288-TT
- Status
- Default Respondent
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Lapeer
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 09/01/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | Order Holding Party in Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/28/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Order Setting Aside P Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/24/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Response to Order | PET | 5 | 06/24/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Order of Default of Petitioner | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/12/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Order of Partial Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/12/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 06/12/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/12/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 03/30/2026 | $0.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
*** Information herein deemed reliable but not guaranteed*** LAPEER County: NORTH BRANCH TWP Jurisdiction: Printed on Parcel Number: 016-027-012-01 111,008C 232,600 143,600 89,000 2024 251,700S 251,700 146,000 105,700 2025 225,000S 225,000M 250,000 141,200 108,800 2026 225,000C 247,900 139,100 108,800 2027 Taxable Value Tribunal/ Other Board of Review Assessed Value Building Value Land Value Year * Factors * Description Frontage Depth Front Depth Rate %Adj. Reason Value TILLABLE ROW 0.79 Acres 0 100 0 TILLABLE POND 2.50 Acres 4000 100 10,000 TILLABLE WOODS 13.20 Acres 5600 100 73,920 TILLABLE TILLABLE 2 5.40 Acres 6400 100 34,560 TILLABLE TILLABLE 3 14.60 Acres 6300 100 91,980 TILLABLE TILLABLE 4 0.10 Acres 6000 100 600 TILLABLE TILLABLE 5 1.00 Acres 6000 100 6,000 TILLABLE TILLABLE 7 0.10 Acres 5400 100 540 37.69 Total Acres Total Est. Land Value = 217,600 Land Value Estimates for Land Table 1.AGRICULTURAL / / INSPECTED Who When What Level Rolling Low High Landscaped Swamp Wooded Pond Waterfront Ravine Wetland Flood Plain Topography of Site Dirt Road Gravel Road Paved Road Storm Sewer Sidewalk Water Sewer Electric Gas Curb Street Lights Standard Utilities Underground Utils. Public Improvements Vacant Improved X The Equalizer. Copyright (c) 1999 - 2009. Licensed To: Township of Burlington, County of Lapeer, Michigan Default Comments Comments/Influences COMMENCING AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, T9N--R11E, NORTH BRANCH TWP, LAPEER COUNTY, MICHIGAN; THENCE NO2'O9'53"W 910.31 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 27 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: RUNNING THENCE NO2'09'53"W 410.31 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF SECTION 27; THENCE N86'59'22"E 2617.36 FEET ALONG THE NORTH 1/8 LINE OF SAID SECTION 27; THENCE S0214'18"E 660.46 FEET ALONG THE NORTH-SOUTH 1/4 LINE OF SAID SECTION 27; THENCE S86'59'35"W 2269.69 FEET; THENCE NO2'09'53"W 250.00 FEET; THENCE S86•59'35"W 348.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. BEING A PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, T9N--R11E, NORTH BRANCH TOWNSHIP, LAPEER COUNTY, MICHIGAN AND CONTAINING 37.69 ACRES OF LAND. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD. Tax Description MULHERIN KEVIN / APRIL 4840 LK PLEASANT RD NORTH BRANCH MI 48461 Owner's Name/Address 4840 LK PLEASANT RD Property Address 2027 Est TCV 495,746 TCV/TFA: 316.16 MAP #: P.R.E. 100% 04/04/2024 School: NORTH BRANCH AREA SCHOOLS Status Number Date Building Permit(s) Zoning: A-R A Class: AGRICULTURAL-IMPRO 0.0 DEED 3389/360 09-FAMILY/RELATED ENTITY QC 02/26/2024 0 MULHERIN KEVIN / APRIL MULHERIN KEVIN 100.0 PROPERTY TRANSFER 3389/938 03-ARM'S LENGTH WD 02/26/2024 399,900 MULHERIN KEVIN BIGELOW ERIC & LAURA Prcnt. Trans. Verified By Liber & Page Terms of Sale Inst. Type Sale Date Sale Price Grantee Grantor 09/01/2026
Page 2
Class: C Effec. Age: 32 Floor Area: 1,568 Total Base New : 322,696 E.C.F. Total Depr Cost: 219,432 X 1.220 Estimated T.C.V: 267,707 Cost Est. for Res. Bldg: 1 Single Family 1 STORY Cls C Blt 1965 (11) Heating System: Forced Air w/ Ducts Ground Area = 1568 SF Floor Area = 1568 SF. Phy/Ab.Phy/Func/Econ/Comb. % Good=68/100/100/100/68 Building Areas Stories Exterior Foundation Size Cost New Depr. Cost 1 Story Siding Basement 1,568 Total: 253,792 172,578 Other Additions/Adjustments Plumbing 3 Fixture Bath 1 4,833 3,286 Water/Sewer 1000 Gal Septic 1 5,060 3,441 Water Well, 200 Feet 1 11,401 7,753 Porches CCP (1 Story) 48 1,652 1,123 4in Concrete 30 265 180 Deck Treated Wood 416 6,960 4,733 Treated Wood 252 5,010 3,407 w/Roof (Roof portion) 30 696 473 Garages Class: C Exterior: Siding Foundation: 42 Inch (Unfinished) Base Cost 672 28,775 19,567 Common Wall: 1/2 Wall 1 -1,397 -950 Fireplaces Interior 1 Story 1 5,649 3,841 Totals: 322,696 219,432 Notes: ECF (TOWNSHIP AG) 1.220 => TCV: 267,707 Carport Area: Roof: Bsmnt Garage: Year Built: Car Capacity: Class: C Exterior: Siding Brick Ven.: 0 Stone Ven.: 0 Common Wall: 1/2 Wal Foundation: 42 Inch Finished ?: Auto. Doors: 0 Mech. Doors: 0 Area: 672 % Good: 0 Storage Area: 0 No Conc. Floor: 0 (17) Garage CCP (1 Story) 4in Concrete Treated Wood Treated Wood Roof Cover Onl 48 30 416 252 30 Type Area (16) Porches/Decks Interior 1 Story Interior 2 Story 2nd/Same Stack Two Sided Exterior 1 Story Exterior 2 Story Prefab 1 Story Prefab 2 Story Heat Circulator Raised Hearth Wood Stove Direct-Vented Gas 1 (15) Fireplaces Appliance Allow. Cook Top Dishwasher Garbage Disposal Bath Heater Vent Fan Hot Tub Unvented Hood Vented Hood Intercom Jacuzzi Tub Jacuzzi repl.Tub Oven Microwave Standard Range Self Clean Range Sauna Trash Compactor Central Vacuum Security System (15) Built-ins Lump Sum Items: Public Water Public Sewer Water Well 1000 Gal Septic 2000 Gal Septic 1 1 (14) Water/Sewer Average Fixture(s) 3 Fixture Bath 2 Fixture Bath Softener, Auto Softener, Manual Solar Water Heat No Plumbing Extra Toilet Extra Sink Separate Shower Ceramic Tile Floor Ceramic Tile Wains Ceramic Tub Alcove Vent Fan 2 (13) Plumbing Few Ave. X Many No. of Elec. Outlets Min Ord. Ex. X No./Qual. of Fixtures Amps Service 0 (12) Electric Central Air Wood Furnace Forced Air w/o Ducts Forced Air w/ Ducts Forced Hot Water Electric Baseboard Elec. Ceil. Radiant Radiant (in-floor) Electric Wall Heat Space Heater Wall/Floor Furnace Forced Heat & Cool Heat Pump No Heating/Cooling X Elec. Steam Oil Coal Gas Wood X (11) Heating/Cooling Joists: Unsupported Len: Cntr.Sup: (10) Floor Support Recreation SF Living SF Walkout Doors (B) No Floor SF Walkout Doors (A) (9) Basement Finish Conc. Block Poured Conc. Stone Treated Wood Concrete Floor (8) Basement Basement: 1568 S.F. Crawl: 0 S.F. Slab: 0 S.F. Height to Joists: 0.0 (7) Excavation Drywall X (6) Ceilings Kitchen: Other: Other: (5) Floors H.C. X Solid
Page 3
Total
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. 26-002288 Respondent’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government: Township Of North Branch (LAPEER) First Name M.I. Last Name Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any: First Name Nathan M.I. D Last Name Hager Firm Name (if any) Lapeer Appraisal, Inc. Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 7469 Clifford Rd City or Town Marlette State Michigan ZIP Code 48453 Telephone Number 8106148487 E-mail Address nathan@lapeerappraisal.com Subject Property Information: Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. *If necessary, attach a separate sheet. N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more? Yes
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal: The subject property was assessed according to the STC guidelines and the Assessor's Manual. Local land values were developed and local neighborhood ECF's applied. Jurisdictional Issues: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES: Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended: March If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, please cite the Board’s authority? Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, please explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? No If yes, when was it issued? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE: When was the Notice of Uncapping issued? Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Valuation Information: Parcel Identification Number: 44-016-027-012-01 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 225000 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 225000 What do you believe is the fair market value? 450000 What do you believe is the taxable value? 225000 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent’s Signature: /s/ Nathan D. Hager Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kevin B Mulherin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002288 Township Of North Branch, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent has failed to file an answer. See TTR 281. Respondent must file an answer within 14 days of the entry of this order. Small Claims answer forms can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: August 28, 2026 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002288 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kevin B Mulherin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002288 Township Of North Branch, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent has failed to file an answer. See TTR 281. Respondent must file an answer within 14 days of the entry of this order. Small Claims answer forms can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.2 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: August 28, 2026 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 26-002288 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kevin B Mulherin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002288 Township Of North Branch, Respondent. ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioner was held in default on June 12, 2026, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: August 24, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kevin B Mulherin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002288 Township Of North Branch, Respondent. ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioner was held in default on June 12, 2026, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: August 24, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 Docket No. 26-002288 To whom it may concern: Kevin Mulherin 4840 Lake Pleasant Rd. North Branch, MI 48461 RECEIVED JUN 26 202 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL At the request of the Michigan Tax Tribunal I have completed and enclosed a Multiple Parcel Attachment to Petition Form. I have also enclosed a copy of the tax bill and a notice of assessment. Both of these documents identify the property with a single parcel number. 061-027-012-01 Thank You Kevin Mulherin
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
GOVERNOR
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
LANSING
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
DIRECTOR
MULTIPLE PARCEL ATTACHMENT TO PETITION FORM
VALUATION APPEAL
Petitioner’s Contact Information:
251,700
First Name/Company Name
Mm.)
Last Name
Kevin
B
Mulherin
Valuation Information
Parcel Number: 0 1 6 027
0 1 2
0 1
Classification of Property:
Real]
Personal [J (check one)
Agricultural
Commercial [J]
Industrial [1
Residential [J
Timber-Cutover []
_ Developmental [1
utility (3 (check one)
Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established
| Taxable Value established by the Board of Review:
by the Board of Review:
251,700
What do you believe is the fair market vajue (also known as true cash value)?
What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash
value by .5)
1 91 ,000
What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed
assessed value)
1 91 ,000
Valuation Information
Parcel Number: 0 1 6-027-0 1 2-0 1
Classification of Property:
Real]
Personal [I (check one)
Agricultural
Commercial
J
industrial
J
Residential
Timber-Cutover [1
Developmental £3
Utility [] {check one)
Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established
by the Board of Review:
251,700
Taxable Value established by the Board of Review:
251,700
382,000
What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)?
What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash
value by .5)
1 91 ,000
What do you believe is the taxable value? {cannot exceed
assessed value)
191.000
Valuation Information
Parcel Number: 0 1 6-027-0 1 2-0 1
Classification of Property:
Real]
Personal [J (check one)
Agricuitural
Commercial [1
industrial [J
Residential (J
Timber-Cutover [1
Developmental [1
Utility [] {check one)
Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established
Taxable Value established by the Board of Review:Page 3
798 Prop #: 016-027-012-01 NORTH BRANCH TOWNSHIP 2025 Winter Bill #: + MESSAGE TO TAXPAYER PAYMENT INFORMATION PAYMENTS ‘ARE ‘ACCEPTED BY MAIL, IN PERSON AND IN . : THE DROP BOX. POST MARKS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED! This tax is due by: 03/02/2026 CREDIT CARD PAYMENTS ACCEPTED BY PHONE AND IN Pay by mail to: NORTH BRANCH TWP TREAS PERSON. THE TREASURER WILL BE IN THE OFFICE 9 AM- 6771 ELM ST BOX 186 1 PM ON TUESDAY AND THURSDAY. NORTH BRANCH MI 48461 TUESDAY DEC. 30, 2025 9-5 PM MONDAY MAR. 2, 2026 LAST DAY TQ PAY AT TWP UNTIL 5PM TAX DETAIL PROPERTY INFORMATION | Pp d To: Taxable Value: 251,700 AGRICULTURAL-IMPRO Toperty Assesse 0: State Equalized Value: 251,700 Ciass: 101 MULHERIN KEVIN / APRIL PRE/MBT &: 100.0000 4840 LK PLEASANT RD a * N NORTR BRANCH, MI 48461 Mort Code: NORTH BRANCH AREA SC Taxes are based upon Taxable Value. Prop #: 016-027-012-01 School: 44090 1 mill equals $1.00 per $1000 of Taxable Value. Prop Addr: 4840 LK PLEASANT RD Amounts with no millage are either Special Assessments or other charges added to this bill. Legal Description: DESCRIPTION MILLAGE AMOUNT COMMENCING AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 27, T9N--R11E, NORTH, BRANCH TRE, -IAPEER COUNTY, MICHIGAN; THENCRK NAZTOGFAIME Q10,. 31 FRET ALONG THR SENIORS 0.38590 97.13 WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 27 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: RUNNING THENCE MCF 0.31490 79.26 NO2'0953"W 410.31 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF SECTION 27; THENCE LAPEER EMS 1.17360 295.39 N86'59'22¢E 2617.36 FEET ALONG THE NORTH 1/8 LINE OF SAID SECTION 27: VETERANS 0.18370 16.23 THENCE S0214'1B“E 660.46 FEET ALONG THE NORTH-SOUTH 1/4 LINE OF SAID . : SECTION 27; THENCE $86'59'35"W 2269.69 FEET; THENCE MO2'09'S3"W 250.00 LAPEER ISD 2.76210 695.22 FEET; THENCE 5B6+59'35"W 348.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. BEING A PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TON~-R11£, NORTH BRANCH TOWNSHIP TAX 1.38960 349.76 TOWNSHIP, LAPEER COUNTY, MICHIGAN AND CONTAINING 37.69 ACRES OF LAND. NB LIBRARY 0.93600 235.59 SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD. N BRANCH OPER 18.00000 EXEMPT N BRANCH DEBT 8.00000 2,013.60 LAW 1.42900 359.67 NB FIRE 1.48450 373.64 ROCKWELL 0.00000 & 24.45 *BALANCE OF DESCRIPTION ON FILE* N BR FLINT RIVER 0.00000 49.22 OPERATING FISCAL YEARS The taxes on bill will be used for governmental ¢ operations for the following fiscal year(s): Total Tax 36.05930 4,619.16 County: 7/1/2025 - 6/30/2026 Administraticn Fee 45.45 Twn/Cty: 7/1/2025 - 6/30/2026 - School: 10/1/2025 - 9/30/2026 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 4,664.61 State: 10/1/2025 - 9/30/2026 Does NOT affect when the tax is due or its amount Please detach along perforation. Keep the top portion.
Page 4
00a, ogy Trea THIS IS NOT A TAX BILL L-4400 Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification This form is issued under the, authority of Public Act 206 of 1883, Sec. 211.24c and Sec.211.34c, as amended. This is a model assessment notice to be used by the local assessor. 79 FROM ASSESSOR PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NORTH BRANCH TOWNSHIP PARCEL NUMBER: 016-027-012-01 BOX 186 PROPERTY ADDRESS: NORTH BRANCH MI 48461 4840 LK PLEASANT RD NORTH BRANCH, MI 48461 SCHOOL DISTRICT CODE: * 44090 OWNER'S NAME & ADDRESS/PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: EXEMPTIONS id % Exempt As "Homeowners Principal Residence": 400.00%
Page 5
North
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kevin B Mulherin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002288 Township Of North Branch, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner failed to submit a multiple parcel petition form. As such, Petitioner must submit a multiple parcel petition form within 14 days of the entry of this order. Tribunal rules and information on Small Claims petitions can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.i Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By:_______________________________ Entered: June 12, 2026 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002288 Page 2 of 2 A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kevin B Mulherin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002288 Township Of North Branch, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner failed to submit a multiple parcel petition form. As such, Petitioner must submit a multiple parcel petition form within 14 days of the entry of this order. Tribunal rules and information on Small Claims petitions can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.ii Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By:_______________________________ Entered: June 12, 2026 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk ii “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 26-002288 Page 2 of 2 service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kevin B Mulherin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002288 Township Of North Branch, Respondent. ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner is appealing assessments for prior tax years and the Tribunal has no authority over those assessments under MCL 205.735a, as the petition was not timely filed.1 Further, the Tribunal also has no authority over those assessments, as the facts alleged do not establish that the assessments were the result of a clerical error (i.e., “an error of a transpositional, typographical, or mathematical nature”) or a mutual mistake of fact (i.e., “an erroneous belief, which is shared and relied on by both parties”).2 Rather, the facts alleged indicate a valuation dispute that does not involve the correction of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s assessment appeal is PARTIALLY DISMISSED. The appeal shall continue for the 2026 tax year(s) only. By:___________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: June 12, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 1 See Electronic Data Systems Corporation v Township of Flint, 253 Mich App 538 (2002). 2 See International Place Apartments – IV v Ypsilanti Township, 216 Mich App 104, 109 (1996), Ford Motor Company v City of Woodhaven, 475 Mich 425, 442 (2006).
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kevin B Mulherin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002288 Township Of North Branch, Respondent. ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner is appealing assessments for prior tax years and the Tribunal has no authority over those assessments under MCL 205.735a, as the petition was not timely filed.3 Further, the Tribunal also has no authority over those assessments, as the facts alleged do not establish that the assessments were the result of a clerical error (i.e., “an error of a transpositional, typographical, or mathematical nature”) or a mutual mistake of fact (i.e., “an erroneous belief, which is shared and relied on by both parties”).4 Rather, the facts alleged indicate a valuation dispute that does not involve the correction of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s assessment appeal is PARTIALLY DISMISSED. The appeal shall continue for the 2026 tax year(s) only. By:___________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: June 12, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 3 See Electronic Data Systems Corporation v Township of Flint, 253 Mich App 538 (2002). 4 See International Place Apartments – IV v Ypsilanti Township, 216 Mich App 104, 109 (1996), Ford Motor Company v City of Woodhaven, 475 Mich 425, 442 (2006).
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING VED APR 0 1 2076 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MARLON |. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Kevin B Mulherin Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 4840 Lake Pleasant Rd. City or Town State ZIP Code North Branch Mi 45461 Telephone Number 248-672-1 908 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) Littlehalo2@hotmail.com Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information } First Name m.1. Last Name Firm Name (if any) Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) Section 3: Subject Property Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. How many parcels are you If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? appealing? Yes* [J No** **If No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel Property Address (No., Street) 4840 lake pleasant rd State ZIP Code Michigan [48461 City or Town North Branch en) apeer
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR TAREE DIRECTOR Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check ali that apply) True Cash and Taxable Value Taxable Value Only (calculation) [] Uncapping of Taxable Value Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal North Branch Township property tax appeal board was presented the following: Appraisal from a licensed appraiser (including photos). The appraisal valued the property art $389,000. | testified that | ultimately paid $382,000 for the property ($400,000 $18,000 in concessions) | testified that the reason for the concessions were: The Well water failed inspection. (5 times the allowable limit of Arsenic) The septic system Failed inspection, and also was never permitted or inspected as current law requires. The septic system will require TOTAL replacement, tank and field. After reviewing all of this information they decided to reduce the SEV a very modest $25,000. The current SEV is set at $225,000 and should be $195,000 or LESS. Thank you for your consideration. Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes [H] No If Yes, check which BOR you attended: (M4 March [J July [J] December If No, please check the applicable reason(s): [] Not required to attend [| Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 0 Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping Other If you checked “other” above, explain:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 7: Valuation Information suse the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. P: | Number: erect 016-027-012-01 Classification of Property: Real J Personal [J (check one) Agricultural 4 Commercial 0 Industrial J Residential [J Timber-Cutover (] ~~ Developmental (J Utility (J (check one) Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: by the Board of Review: $225 000 $225.000 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? PB 352. Qc What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed value by .5) $191,000 assessed value) $191,000 Fee Information Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at issue? WA Yes [J no If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees. If the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00 If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $125.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $Over $500,000.00 $300.00 If the property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. If the property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. Signatu Ie *Required Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Rep tative’s Signature: sw Rsine Weel Perm
Page 4
NORTH BRANCH TOWNSHIP
Page 5
v
Page 6
Mic
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kevin B Mulherin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002288 Township Of North Branch, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: June 12, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kevin B Mulherin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002288 Township Of North Branch, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: June 12, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING VED APR 0 1 2076 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MARLON |. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Kevin B Mulherin Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 4840 Lake Pleasant Rd. City or Town State ZIP Code North Branch Mi 45461 Telephone Number 248-672-1 908 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) Littlehalo2@hotmail.com Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information } First Name m.1. Last Name Firm Name (if any) Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) Section 3: Subject Property Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. How many parcels are you If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? appealing? Yes* [J No** **If No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel Property Address (No., Street) 4840 lake pleasant rd State ZIP Code Michigan [48461 City or Town North Branch en) apeer
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR TAREE DIRECTOR Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check ali that apply) True Cash and Taxable Value Taxable Value Only (calculation) [] Uncapping of Taxable Value Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal North Branch Township property tax appeal board was presented the following: Appraisal from a licensed appraiser (including photos). The appraisal valued the property art $389,000. | testified that | ultimately paid $382,000 for the property ($400,000 $18,000 in concessions) | testified that the reason for the concessions were: The Well water failed inspection. (5 times the allowable limit of Arsenic) The septic system Failed inspection, and also was never permitted or inspected as current law requires. The septic system will require TOTAL replacement, tank and field. After reviewing all of this information they decided to reduce the SEV a very modest $25,000. The current SEV is set at $225,000 and should be $195,000 or LESS. Thank you for your consideration. Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes [H] No If Yes, check which BOR you attended: (M4 March [J July [J] December If No, please check the applicable reason(s): [] Not required to attend [| Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 0 Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping Other If you checked “other” above, explain:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 7: Valuation Information suse the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. P: | Number: erect 016-027-012-01 Classification of Property: Real J Personal [J (check one) Agricultural 4 Commercial 0 Industrial J Residential [J Timber-Cutover (] ~~ Developmental (J Utility (J (check one) Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: by the Board of Review: $225 000 $225.000 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? PB 352. Qc What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed value by .5) $191,000 assessed value) $191,000 Fee Information Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at issue? WA Yes [J no If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees. If the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00 If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $125.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $Over $500,000.00 $300.00 If the property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. If the property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. Signatu Ie *Required Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Rep tative’s Signature: sw Rsine Weel Perm
Page 4
NORTH BRANCH TOWNSHIP
Page 5
v
Page 6
Mic
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.