Hasan A Chowdhury, Petitioner V City Of Detroit, Respondent

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Hasan A Chowdhury, 

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

MTT Docket No.24-003539

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that 

Petitioner was placed in default on September 17, 2025, for failing to appear at a duly-

scheduled hearing. Even though Petitioner failed to comply with the order, the Tribunal 

must consider Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury1 prior to the dismissal of this case. In Grimm, 

the Michigan Court of Appeals summarized factors that the Tribunal must consider 

before imposing the sanction of dismissal. Those factors are:

(1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of 

refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the 

opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) 

the degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) 

attempts to cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better 

serve the interests of justice.2 

Petitioner’s failure to appear at the hearing and failure to comply with the Order of 

Default has established a history of deliberate delay. As a result, giving careful 

consideration to the factors involved and considering all options in determining what 

sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser 

sanction would not be appropriate. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

This order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case.

1 Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).

2 Id. at 149.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003539

Page 2 of 4

APPEAL RIGHTS

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless 

the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a 

principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the 

decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, 

if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the 

opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to 

electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the 

motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral 

arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal.

Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the 

claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If 

the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal 

by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the 

record on appeal. There is no certification fee. 

By:___________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: October 8, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Hasan A Chowdhury, 

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

MTT Docket No.24-003539

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that 

Petitioner was placed in default on September 17, 2025, for failing to appear at a duly-

scheduled hearing. Even though Petitioner failed to comply with the order, the Tribunal 

must consider Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury3 prior to the dismissal of this case. In Grimm, 

the Michigan Court of Appeals summarized factors that the Tribunal must consider 

before imposing the sanction of dismissal. Those factors are:

(1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of 

refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the 

opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) 

the degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) 

attempts to cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better 

serve the interests of

Page 4

MTT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Hasan A Chowdhury,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

MTT Docket No. 24-003539

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that Petitioner and Respondent 

failed to appear for the duly-noticed hearing scheduled for September 17, 2025. Thus, 

this case is subject to dismissal or a default hearing.1 Prior to dismissal or the 

scheduling of a default hearing, however, the Tribunal finds that placing the absent 

party in default and ordering an explanation and documentation justifying the absence 

at the proceeding is appropriate.2 Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the absent party is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall submit information and 

documentation as directed above. The response must be filed with the Tribunal and 

served on the opposing party or the opposing party’s authorized representative within 

14 days of entry of this order.3 

Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this case or the scheduling of 

a default hearing, as provided by TTR 237.

By______________________________

Entered: September 17, 2025

 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

1 See TTR 247 & TTR 275.

2 See TTR 231 and See Grimm v Department of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).

3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003539 

Page 2 of 4

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Hasan A Chowdhury,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

MTT Docket No. 24-003539

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that Petitioner and Respondent 

failed to appear for the duly-noticed hearing scheduled for September 17, 2025. Thus, 

this case is subject to dismissal or a default hearing.4 Prior to dismissal or the 

scheduling of a default hearing, however, the Tribunal finds that placing the absent 

party in default and ordering an explanation and documentation justifying the absence 

at the proceeding is appropriate.5 Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the absent party is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall submit information and 

documentation as directed above. The response must be filed with the Tribunal and 

served on the opposing party or the opposing party’s authorized representative within 

14 days of entry of this order.6 

Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this case or the scheduling of 

a default hearing, as provided by TTR 237.

By______________________________

Entered: September 17, 2025

 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

4 See TTR 247 & TTR 275.

5 See TTR 231 and See Grimm v Department of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).

6 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal

Page 4

MT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Hasan A Chowdhury,

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

MTT Docket No.: 24-003539

City of Detroit, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF TELEPHONE HEARING

The Tribunal has scheduled a telephone hearing to be conducted as follows. Hearings are 

generally 30 minutes in length. 

HEARING DATE:

September 17, 2025 

HEARING TIME:

9:45 AM EST

JOIN BY PHONE:

1-248-509-0316

ACCESS CODE:

857254294 

 

This hearing will be held by telephone conference call with the Judge as the host. In order to join 

the hearing, call the phone number listed above at least 5 minutes prior to the hearing time. You 

will then be required to input the access code, followed by # to connect. The Tribunal judge will call 

in and join by phone at the hearing time. Failure to timely call in may result in the placement of a 

party or parties in default.

This is an important legal document. Please have someone translate the document.

Este es un documento legal importante. Por favor, haga traducir este documento.

এটি একটি গুরুত্বপূর্ণ আইনি দলিল, অনুগ্রহ করে কেউ দলিলটিকে অনুবাদ করুন।

.ةقيثولا مجرتت صخش كيدل ىجري ةماه ةينوناق ةقيثو وه اذه

Ito ay isang mahalagang legal na dokumento. Mangyari lamang na magkaroon ng isang tao isalin ang 

dokumento.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003539

Page 2 of 12

HEARING INFORMATION – PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY

GENERAL INFORMATION: An impartial hearing will be conducted in accordance with the Michigan Tax 

Tribunal Rules (R 792.10201-R 792.10297) and the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act, MCL 24.201 et 

seq. The Michigan Rules of Evidence and the Michigan Court Rules may be applicable. Parties are expected 

to exercise proper respect and courtesy toward other parties, witnesses, and administrative law judges, which 

includes attending the hearing on time, silencing cell phones, and choosing a quiet, private location to 

participate in the hearing to limit distractions and ensure minimal background noise. The hearing may be 

recorded for notetaking purposes, but the recording is not a formal record, unless otherwise provided for by the 

Tribunal.

REPRESENTATION: You may have an attorney or anyone else of your choice represent you at the hearing. 

The Tribunal does not recommend or appoint representatives for you and will not pay for your representative.

WITNESSES: You may have anyone join you at the hearing to speak in support of your case. However, the 

time to present your case is limited and additional time may not be provided to accommodate witness 

testimony.

DOCUMENTATION: Parties are required to submit all documents in support of their contentions to both the 

Tribunal and the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents were 

previously submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the 

documents are not timely submitted to both the Tribunal and the opposing party, the documents may be 

excluded. Documents may be submitted to the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s electronic filing (e-

filing) system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to 

submission by e-mail. If sent by mail, the documents must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized 

representative at the address identified in the petition or answer for that party or authorized representative, 

unless the party or authorized representative filed an appearance or other documentation identifying a different 

mailing address. The documents do not need to be resubmitted after the Notice of Hearing if they were 

previously submitted to the Tribunal and the opposing party in this case.

If a hearing had previously been scheduled in this case and adjourned, and the adjournment order indicates 

that the parties are precluded from submitting any further documentary evidence, no further documentary 

evidence will be accepted even if filed and exchanged as indicated above.

INCLUSION OF SUBSEQUENT TAX YEARS: Subsequent tax year assessments are automatically included 

in valuation appeals once the assessment has been established for that tax year. For purposes of 

administrative efficiency, the Tribunal considers this date April 1st. As such, the parties should submit 

documentation and be prepared to discuss subsequent tax year assessments at hearings to be conducted on 

or after April 1st in a subsequent year. If the hearing is to be conducted prior to April 1st in a subsequent year, 

taxpayers are required to file a new petition and, if necessary, protest the subsequent tax year assessment at 

the March Board of Review for that year. 

MOTIONS/REQUESTS: A motion is a written request filed by a party asking the Tribunal to take certain action. 

The following motions and requests may be filed by either party regarding the scheduled hearing. Motions and 

requests may be submitted to the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Motions and 

requests may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to submission by e-mail. If 

sent by mail, motions and requests must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized representative at the

Page 3

MTT

Page 4

MTT

Page 5

ST

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Hasan A Chowdhury,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003539

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003539

Page 2 of 8

If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or 

email taxtrib@michigan.gov.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: October 22, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Hasan A Chowdhury,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003539

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of

Page 4

MTT

Page 5

STA

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

0CT 14 204 

: 

STATE 

OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES 

ACTING DIRECTOR 

SUZANNE SONNEBORN 

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-003539 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

.| 

First Name: 

M.1.: 

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government: 

Daria 

Poole 

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rurat Route}: 

County: 

” 

2 Woodward Ave, Ste 804 

Wayne 

City or Town: 

State: 

21P Code: 

Detroit 

MI 

148226 

Telephone Number: 

Fax Number: 

313-628-0267 

313-224-9400 

E-mail Address {do not enter unless you want MTT to send alt correspondence via email}: 

[Taxtribunal@detroitmi.gov 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name: 

Mi: 

Last Name: 

Daria 

Poole 

Firm Name {if any): 

Address {(No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

2 Woodward Ave, Ste 804 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Detroit 

MI 

48226 

Telephone Number: 

Fax Number: 

313-628-0267 

313-224-9400 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via : email): 

-|Taxtribunal@detroitmi.gov 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence 

| Exemption of 58% or more? 

A ves 

[1 No

Page 2

’ 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES 

ACTING DIRECTOR 

SUZANNE SONNEBORN 

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

Petitioner did not file a Poverty exemption application. 

Section 5; Jurisdictional Issues 

(F PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review {BOR)? [1] Yes 

[i] No 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [] March 

 [[] guy 

[J December 

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? 0 Yes 

[H} No 

*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessmenl(s) at issue, did it have authority? [| Yes 

[No 

if yes, cite the Board's authority. 

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? LJ Yes 

|} No 

if yes, explain 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order?

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES 

SUZANNE SONNEBORN 

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 

ACTING DIRECTOR 

Did Pelitioner request a Poverty Exemption ata BOR? [| Yes 

[Wd No 

i 

Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

{ 

J March 

[| yuty 

[} December 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS 

Did Petitioner request the exemption ata BOR? {| Yes 

[_] No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: |] March 

{J yuy 

[J December 

Tax Year(s) denied: 

List the date the exemption was denied: 

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY 

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

0 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential. 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one} 

Section 6: Valuation Information use te multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel identification Number: 

09008947 

Classification of Property: 

Reat 

Personal 

(check one) 

MO 

’ 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value {also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

20,600.00 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

8,403.00 

What do you believe is the fair market value {also known as True Cash Value}? 

41,299.00 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

20,600.00

Page 4

»x+P293URIBNL 

J0U 

ING STYRTIS

00% ‘£1 

1000’¢T 

7702 

py 

7 

Jo 

4A3un

006781 

009 

'€T 

£208) 

ay AQU-TAL §T02/22/L0 TAL 

¥009°0Z 

HOGS OZ 

1009 02 

00¢ ‘02 

7207] 

TENId-TAL 9102/52/50 TAL 

100907 

Szoz| 

 3eum 

sum 

ou 

T3430 

maTABY 

‘antes 

JTRUNGTAL 

(30 

PITOE 

ipessassy 

00€ ‘02 

ianTeA 

ibuTtprrng 

ze8% 

uted Pood 

pueTaas 

sutaey! 

: 

Juoazasiem! 

i 

puod; 

: 

pspoom 

dwenmsg: 

padeospurn 

46TH 

M07 

; 

burro 

: 

Tena 

8318 

10 Audeabodo 

1STT30 punoabrepun 

S2TITITIN PIPpuRls) 

X 

$2USTT 

1322138! 

¥ 

a 

— 

antep ysed nil s3uswasoidwl 

pueT PIIRWTIST 

[EIOL 

Ga00; 

oz 

oot 

6° ¢ 

TI4 

‘Uysew. atm :BuTousj | 

seo 

HEED 

Poon 

§ 

2TIS 

ERE 

uotadriosag 

otaio8tdy 

§23BWTIIST 

3505 

2Usw2A0IdWI 

pueT 

Tamag: 

133RY 

XTEMSPIS 

Luk 

'383 

TBj0l 

$310y TRIOL 

L0°0 

‘3I8BI 

JuCII 

TeNIdY 

Of 

ABMB8 WIIG 

H 

E 

De 

TEI03 

9U3 

©] SINGIAIUOD 

JOU 

CP 3BYI 

SDUIT 

$320USD 

PROY 

ponkd: 

LE 

00T 

¢TI'0 

33 

bs 000°%00°¢ 

A7IS AQ FIVE 

Id OS | 

peoy Tesein 

[i 

~C0T 

© 

0000°0 0000°T 

CO" 00T 00°0€ 

. 

: 

peoy 271d 

ucseayd 

“{pyy 

a3ey 

yadsg 

3uoxri 

uyadag 

ebe2iuoag 

uoT31dT20830 

sauswaaoxdul 

. 

$103027 

oT1and 

| 

¥ 

NYE/0YENTD-90EUE 90EME STRL

Page 5

&

Page 6

ST

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

ORLENE HAWKS 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Hasan A Chowdhury 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MOAHR Docket No.24-003539 

City of Detroit 

Respondent(s) 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Daria Poole 

states that on 10/09/2024 

he/she 

[Name of person serving/mailing petition] 

[date of service] 

served a copy of the response 

relative to the above-captioned matter upon: 

[Provide name and address of the party/people being served] 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

P.O. Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909-8195 

/ [Sigrature of person who is serving/mailing copy] 

Daria Poole 

[Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy] 

MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

611 W. OTTAWA ST » P.O. BOX 30232 « LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909-8195 « 517-335-9760

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

ORLENE HAWKS 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Hasan A Chowdhury 

; 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MOAHR Docket No. 24-003539 

City of Detroit 

Respondent(s) 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Daria Poole 

states that on 10/09/2024 

he/she 

[Name of person serving/mailing petition] 

[date of service] 

served a copy of the response 

relative to the above-captioned matter upon: 

[Provide name and address of the party/people being served] 

Hasan A Chowdhury 

12248 Charest 

Detroit, Ml 48212 

Cirboi fork 

{[Sighature of person who is serving/mailing copy] 

Daria Poole 

[Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy] 

MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES 

MICHIGAN TAX 

| RIBUNAL 

611 W. OTTAWA ST « P.O. BOX 30232 « LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909-8195 « 517-335-9760

Page 5

Parcel Number: 

09009947. 

Jurisdiction: 

CITY OF DETROIT 

County: 

WAYNE 

Printed on 

10/09/2024 

Grantor 

[Grantee 

EE 

| 

i 

Sale 

Sale 

Inst. 

Terms 

of 

Sale 

Liber 

Verified 

Prcnt, 

| 

Price 

Date 

Type 

& Page 

By 

Trans. 

RAHMAN, 

SAMI 

CHOWDHURY, RAHMAN, HASAN, 

T | 

10,000 

12/27/2023 

|QCD 

|21-NOT USED/OTHER 

"2024000428 

|PROPERTY TRANSFER . 100.0 

RATKOWSKI, 

DONNA 

& FIEBEL 

|RAHMAN, 

SAMI 

© 

| 

57,000| 

11/07/2018 

[WD 

21-NOT USED/OTHER 

2018318810 

[PROPERTY TRANSFER 

100.0 

|RATKOWSKT, 

STELLA 

[RaTKOWSKT, 

STELLA 

| 

1| 

06/17/2016 |PTA 

21-NOT USED/OTHER 

| PROPERTY TRANSFER 

0.0 

L__ 

| 

I 

| 

| I 

|Property Address 

class: 

RESIDENTIAL-IMPRO 

|Zoning: 

R2 

Building 

Permit (s) 

| 

Date 

|Number 

|Status 

12248 CHAREST 

[School: DETROIT CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 

i 

BN 

i 

B 

oo 

|P.R.E. 

100% 

06/17/2024 

El 

Owner's 

Na 

Add 

WA 

oT 

Co 

¢ 

me 

/Address 

[WARD#: 

09 

[ 

dena 

HASAN, TAHNINA 

2025 Est TCV 41,299 TCV/TFA: 46.93 

DETROIT MI 

48212 

x [Improved 

[ 

[vacant 

Land Value Estimates 

for Land Table 3R306. 3R306-CAMPAU/BANGLATOWN-GROUP A 

BN BN Co 

| 

Public 

* 

Factors 

* 

| 

Improvements 

Description 

Frontage 

Depth 

Front 

Depth 

Rate 

%Adj. 

Reason 

Value 

r 

S——— 

Dict Road 

30.00 100.00 1.0000 0.0000 

0 

100% 

0 

|Tax Description 

a 

1 

|éravel Road 

SQ FT RATE BY SIZE 

3,006.000 Sq Ft 

0.17 

100 

507 

{E CHAREST 

258 

SCHELLBERG 

& 

BARNES 

SUB 

L17 

|x 

Paved Road 

+ denotes 

lines 

that 

do 

not contribute 

to 

the 

total 

acreage calculation. 

Pl PLATS, 

W 

C 

R 9/132 30 

X 

100 

Ix 

|storm Sewer 

30 Actual 

Front 

Feet, 

0.07 Total Acres 

Total 

Est. 

Land Value 

= 

507 

|Comments/Influences 

1x 

|sidewalk 

— 

a 

I 

ET 

|X 

Water 

. 

| 

X 

|sewer 

Land 

Improvement Cost Estimates 

| 

Ix 

Electric 

Description 

Rate 

Size 

% 

Good 

Cash 

Value 

| 

1x 

lcas 

Fencing: 

Wire Mesh, 

#11 

3.49 

100 

20 

70 

| 

lcurb 

Total Estimated Land 

Improvements 

True Cash Value 

= 

70 

| 

|X 

|Street Lights 

— 

— 

EE 

BE 

h 

| 

X 

Standard Utilities 

[ 

| 

|underground 

Utils. 

| 

| 

Topography 

of 

Site 

[x 

Level 

Bh 

Bl 

Rolling 

| 

% 

Low 

High 

| 

iLandscaped 

Swamp 

|Wooded 

pond 

Waterfront 

Ravine 

Wetland 

— 

I 

SE 

—. 

—— 

Flood 

Plain 

Year 

Land 

Building 

Assessed 

Board 

of 

Tribunal/ 

Taxable 

[ 

Value 

Value 

Value 

Review 

Other| 

Value 

Who 

When 

What 

2025 

300] 

20,300] 

20,600] 

1 

20, 600C 

| 

CURES ToT 05/25/2016 TYL-FINAL 

2024 

300 

20,300 

20,600] 

20,600M 

20,6008 

20,6008 

The Equalizer. 

Copyright 

(c) 

1999 

- 

2009.|ryr 07/22/2015 TYL-ADV 

RE 

= 

- 

oo 

h 

23 

13,600 

13,900 

8,403C 

Licensed 

To: 

City 

of 

Detroit, 

County 

of 

20 

300 

3 

! 

| 

I 

Wayne, 

Michigan 

2022 

300 

13,000 

13,300] 

| 

8,003C 

xx 

Information 

herein deemed reliable 

but 

not guaranteed***

Page 6

Printed 

on 

| 

10/09/2024 

Residential 

Building 

1 

of 

1 

Parcel 

Number: 

09009947. 

[ 

Building Type 

| 

(3) 

Roof (cont.) 

(11) 

Heating/Cooling 

(15) 

Built-ins 

(15) 

Fireplaces 

(16) 

2orches/Decks 

| 

(¥7) 

Garage 

- 

|X 

[single Family 

i 

Eavestrough 

— 

|x 

[Gas 

0il 

Elec. 

Appliance Allow. 

Interior 

1 

Story |Area|Type 

~ 

Year Built: 

[Mobile 

Home 

Insulation 

Wood 

Coal 

Steam 

Cook 

Top 

Interior 

2 

Story 

132 CCP 

(1 Story) Cax® 

Capacity: 

Town Home 

0|Front Overhang 

— 

- 

Dishwasher 

2nd/Same 

Stack 

[ 

so0lwer 

(1 Ea 

Class: 

CD 

Duplex 

0/Other Overhan 

Forced Le 

w/o 

Ducts 

Garbage Disposal 

Two Sided 

OY) 

lpxderior: 

Siding 

9 

X 

|Forced Air 

w/ 

Ducts 

A-Freme 

Bath Heater 

Exterior 

1 

Story 

|Briick Ven.: 

0 

1 

———— 

(4) 

Interior 

Forced Hot Water 

Vent 

Fan 

Exterior 

2 

Story 

Ist 

e Ven.: 

0 

|? 

Wood 

Frame 

Electric Baseboard 

Hot 

Tub 

Prefab 

1 

Story 

[col 

Detache 

1 

Drywall 

Plaster 

Elec. 

Ceil. 

Radiant

Page 7

GRETCHEN

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-003539

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City of Detroit (Wayne)

First Name

Leatrice

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government

Lyons

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

2 Woodward Ave

City or Town

Detroit

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48226

Telephone Number

313-628-1101

Fax Number

313-224-9400

E-mail Address

taxtribunal@detroitmi.gov

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Daria

M.I.

Last Name

Poole

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 804

City or Town

Detroit

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48226

Telephone Number

313-628-0267

Fax Number

313-224-9400

E-mail Address

Taxtribunal@detroitmi.gov

Section 3: Subject Property Information

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

Yes

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another.

N/A 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this 

document, you may be held in default.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Petitioner did not file a Poverty exemption application.

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

If yes, cite the Board’s authority.

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? 

If yes, explain.

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

If so, what is the issue date?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued?

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? No

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption:

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS

Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? 

No

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Tax Year(s) denied:

List the date the exemption was denied:

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number:

09009947.

Classification of Property:

Real 

Residential

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

20,600.00

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

8,403.00

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

41,299.99

Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

20,600.00

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Daria Poole

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-003539

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City of Detroit (Wayne)

First Name

Leatrice

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government

Lyons

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

2 Woodward Ave

City or Town

Detroit

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48226

Telephone Number

313-628-1101

Fax Number

313-224-9400

E-mail Address

taxtribunal@detroitmi.gov

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Daria

M.I.

Last Name

Poole

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 804

City or Town

Detroit

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48226

Telephone Number

313-628-0267

Fax Number

313-224-9400

E-mail Address

Taxtribunal@detroitmi.gov

Section 3: Subject Property Information

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

Yes

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another.

N/A 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this 

document, you may be held in default.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Petitioner did not file a Poverty exemption application.

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

If yes, cite the Board’s authority.

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? 

If yes, explain.

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

If so, what is the issue date?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued?

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption:

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS

Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Tax Year(s) denied:

List the date the exemption was denied:

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number:

09009947.

Classification of Property:

Real 

Residential

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

20,600.00

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

8,403.00

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

41,299.00

Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

20,600.00

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Daria Poole

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision 

or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First 

Name 

M.1 

Last Name/Company 

Name 

Seyr) 

A. | checodthurz” 

V4 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

12248. CHAREST 

St 

City or Town Dedooid— 

mt 

| Gy 

ziz- 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

3)3- 521~72¢9) 313:¢$0¢308 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

Mm. 

Last Name 

HASAN 

A 

Chow DHueLy 

. 

Firm Name (if any) 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

12291 CH LEST ST 

ow or Town » efor + 

51 Br > Jz 

Fax Number 

Telephone Number 

) 

’ 

33-371 TAG 31376506 528” 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

hasemahmedRog% 

@ gmat 

« Com 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

parcels are you | [[] ves* 

J] No**

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check 

all that apply) 

[OJ True Cash and Taxable Value 

[1s] Poverty Exemption 

[173 Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[J Disabled Veterans Exemption 

O Uncapping of Taxable Value 

[J Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

[J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a 

[O Classification 

BE 

Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

+his 

15 

Ke sidentral 

Hose. “Ge 

high- 

hosecsed vedue 

Ino 

Texable 

value. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Year(s) you are appealing: 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [Hm] Yes 

Ol No 

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: O March 

0 July 

Oa December 

If No, check the applicable reason(s): 

Not required to attend 

[J Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner 

[| Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) 

0 Appealin

within 35 days of State Tax Commiss

Order

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

09002947 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

a 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

goes — IS A> 

B 

F823 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

NO 

7 

E don. 

/ 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

10 

eo o 

¢ 

Current Taxable Value as established hy the BOR: 

—- 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

(0, 0 

Section 8: Classification Information +only the Mi Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* 

Parcel Identification Number: 

OY 

09947 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

What do you believe is the property's classification? 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

O 

or 

: 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Residential 

» 

If improved property, for what use was the property designed? 

Rs. 

15 

VO — 

If improved property, how is the property currently being used? 

\

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Fee Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? 

Wl ves Ono 

To, 

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 

——————— 

™ 

ves 

[3] No 

If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus 

$25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. 

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State

Page 5

Co

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Hasan A Chowdhury,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003539

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: September 25, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Hasan A Chowdhury,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003539

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: September 25, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision 

or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First 

Name 

M.1 

Last Name/Company 

Name 

Seyr) 

A. | checodthurz” 

V4 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

12248. CHAREST 

St 

City or Town Dedooid— 

mt 

| Gy 

ziz- 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

3)3- 521~72¢9) 313:¢$0¢308 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

Mm. 

Last Name 

HASAN 

A 

Chow DHueLy 

. 

Firm Name (if any) 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

12291 CH LEST ST 

ow or Town » efor + 

51 Br > Jz 

Fax Number 

Telephone Number 

) 

’ 

33-371 TAG 31376506 528” 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

hasemahmedRog% 

@ gmat 

« Com 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

parcels are you | [[] ves* 

J] No**

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check 

all that apply) 

[OJ True Cash and Taxable Value 

[1s] Poverty Exemption 

[173 Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[J Disabled Veterans Exemption 

O Uncapping of Taxable Value 

[J Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

[J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a 

[O Classification 

BE 

Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

+his 

15 

Ke sidentral 

Hose. “Ge 

high- 

hosecsed vedue 

Ino 

Texable 

value. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Year(s) you are appealing: 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [Hm] Yes 

Ol No 

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: O March 

0 July 

Oa December 

If No, check the applicable reason(s): 

Not required to attend 

[J Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner 

[| Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) 

0 Appealin

within 35 days of State Tax Commiss

Order

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

09002947 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

a 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

goes — IS A> 

B 

F823 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

NO 

7 

E don. 

/ 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

10 

eo o 

¢ 

Current Taxable Value as established hy the BOR: 

—- 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

(0, 0 

Section 8: Classification Information +only the Mi Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* 

Parcel Identification Number: 

OY 

09947 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

What do you believe is the property's classification? 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

O 

or 

: 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Residential 

» 

If improved property, for what use was the property designed? 

Rs. 

15 

VO — 

If improved property, how is the property currently being used? 

\

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Fee Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? 

Wl ves Ono 

To, 

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 

——————— 

™ 

ves 

[3] No 

If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus 

$25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. 

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State

Page 5

Co

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.