Record Finder / 26-002563-TT
Michigan

Gary L Corbin Petitioner V City Of Detroit Respondent

Petitioner
Gary L Corbin
Respondent
City Of Detroit

Case overview

Docket number
26-002563-TT
Status
Disposed
CaseType
SC Property
Division
Small Claims Division
County
Wayne
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
8Order of DismissalNot recordedNot recorded09/10/2026Not recordedDownload
7Answer was receivedRESPNot recorded08/19/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
6Order Extending P's DefaultNot recorded508/06/2026Not recordedDownload
5Order of Default of PetitionerNot recordedNot recorded07/08/2026Not recordedDownload
4Order of Partial DismissalNot recordedNot recorded07/08/2026Not recordedDownload
3Petition has been verifiedPET107/08/2026Not recordedDownload
2Notice of Docket Number SCNot recordedNot recorded07/07/2026Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded05/26/2026$0.00Download

Documents

26-002563 Order of Dismissal.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Gary L Corbin, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-002563 

 

City of Detroit, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioner was placed in 

default on July 8, 2026, because they did not submit the required petition filing fee.1 On 

August 6, 2026, the Tribunal extended the time for Petitioner to cure the default by an 

additional 14 days and they have failed to respond. Petitioner has not complied with 

either order, and the latter stated that “failure to comply with this Order may result in the 

dismissal of the case” and referenced Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury.2 In Grimm, the 

Michigan Court of Appeals summarized factors that the Tribunal should consider before 

imposing the sanction of dismissal. Those factors are: 

 

(1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of 

refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the 

opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) 

the degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) 

attempts to cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better 

serve the interests of justice.3 

 

Here, Petitioner’s failure to comply with multiple orders has established a history of 

deliberate delay. As a result, giving careful consideration to the factors involved and 

considering all options in determining what sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal 

finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser sanction would not be appropriate in 

light of Petitioner’s history of noncompliance in this case. 

 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

 

This order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 

 

 

1 TTR 269. 

2 Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

3 Id. at 149.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-002563 

Page 2 of 2 

 

APPEAL RIGHTS 

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless 

the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a 

principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the 

decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, 

if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the 

opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to 

electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the 

motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral 

arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. 

 

Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the 

claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If 

the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal 

by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the 

record on appeal. There is no certification fee. 

 

 

Entered: September 10, 2026 

 

 

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm 

bw 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

MTT Response 18914 Hawthorne.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

B 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

(1a ty 

L Cochin 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No._ 

26-002243 

City of Detroit 

Respondent(s) 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Cole. Brock 

states thaton __ 08/]9 /2026 

he/she 

[Name of person serving/mailing petition] 

[date of service] 

served a copy of the (fly 

of Doloit Doster 

relative to the above-captioned matter upon: 

[Provide name and address of the party/people being served] 

Gacy 

| 

Corbin 

US| 

|) Elza, Hazel fack MI ugozo 

ld 

[Signature of person who is serving/mailing copy] 

Cole Brock 

. [Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy] 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 

N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, Mi 48906

Page 2

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 

Phone: (313) 628-0722 

amor —] 

Board of Review 

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 105 

Fax: (313) 224-4576 

DETROIT 

Detroit, Michigan 48226 

www.detroitmi.gov 

04/06/2026 

CORBIN, GARY 

451 W ELZA AVE 

HAZEL PARK MI 48030 

RE: 

2026 MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW PETITION NUMBER: 

M-00286% 

The March Board of Review has considered the appeal on the 2026 ass 

ent fo) “the below described property 

and concluded that: 

i 

EINDING 

OF FACTS: 

1. 

Parcel Number: 

09021564. 

at 

2. 

Property Address: 

18914 HAWTHORNE 

3. 

District: 

3 

4. 

Property Classification: 

402 

(RESIDENT, 

City Land Bank Sale 

6. 

Principle Residence Exemption: 

| 

5. 

Property Legal Description: 

Property exempt from Ad Valorem taxes and assessed on the ¢ 

Sial Act Roll pursuant to PA 261 of 2003 expiring 12/30/2030. E 

HAWTHORNE N 5 FT 100 101 S 10 FT 102 CADILLAGHEIGHTS SUB L33 P81 PLATS, 

W C R 9/163 35 X 120 

6. 

Petitioner timely filed an appeal to the March Board 

of Review. 

7. The March Board of Review considered’ {if any 

‘petitioner's and/or duly authorized representative evidence 

and/or testimony. The March Board 

iew:gonsidered facts presented as on the assessment roll and/or any 

recommendations offered by the Offic 

CONCLUSION: 

The Board of Review has conside 2 

Before Appeal 

After Appeal 

800 

800 

800 

800 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

P.O. Box 30232 

Lansing 

Mi 48909 

A Michigan Tax Tribunal appeal must be made by May 31st 

of the current year for properties classified as: 

Commercial 

Real, 

Industrial 

Real, 

Commercial 

Personal, 

Industrial 

Personal 

and 

Utility 

Personal 

Property. 

A Michigan Tax Tribunal appeal must be made by July 31st of the current year for Residential Real Property 

Classification. 

A property Classification appeal may only be made for the current year. 

Such appeal may be filed with the 

State Tax Commission, PO Box 30471, 

Lansing, 

MI 48909-7971 

by June 30th 

of the current year 

Sincerely, 

City of Detroit Board of Review 

02, 

023

Page 3

Parcel 

Number: 

09021564. 

‘Grantor 

Grantee 

IDETROIT LAND BANK AUTHORI CORBIN, 

GARY 

{Property Address 

N 

18914 HAWTHORNE 

[Gwner’s Name/Address 

{CORBIN, 

GARY 

451 

W ELZA AVE 

‘HAZEL 

PARK 

MI 48030 

Tax Description 

Property exempt 

from Ad Valorem taxes 

and 

assessed 

on 

the Special Act Roll pursuant 

‘to 

PA 261 

of 

2003 expiring 

12/30/2030. 

RE 

{HAWTHORNE 

N 

5 

FT 

100 

101 

S 

10 

FT 

102 

ADILLAC HEIGHTS 

SUB L33 

P81 

PLATS, 

W 

C 

R 

"9/163 

35 

X 

120 

!Comments/Influences 

3/13/26 MBOR DENIED. 

VALUE SUSTAINED. 

-LR 

9/5/24..PER PICTOMETRY VACANT LOT..KDC 

7/21/23 DESKTOP REVIEW- UNABLE 

TO 

DETERMINE CONDITION OF STRUCTURE 

DUE 

TO 

{TREES OBSTRUCTING VIEW, 

FIELD REVIEW 

IS 

"The Equalizer. 

Copyright (c) 

1999 

— 2009. 

«Licensed 

To: 

City 

of Detroit, 

County 

of 

Wayne, 

Michigan 

EEESMAMSNS 

[CEB 02/18/2026 FIELD REVI 2025 

Jurisdiction: 

CITY 

OF DETROIT 

County: 

WAYNE 

sale 

sale 

Inst. 

|Terms 

of Sale 

Price 

Date 

{Type 

100 09/18/2025 foc 

13-GOVERNMENT 

iClass: RESIDENTIAL-VACAN Zoning: 

R2 

Building Permit (s) 

School: DETROIT CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 

P.R.E. 0% 

[ 

iWARD¥: 

09 

2026 Est TCV 1,529 

|X Vacant 

. 

Improved 

i 

Public 

Improvements 

Dirt Road 

Gravel Road 

Paved Road 

Storm Sewer 

Sidewalk 

Water 

|sewer 

Electric 

Gas 

Curb 

Street Lights 

Standard Utiliti. 

Underground Utils 

Land Value Estima##s 

for Lad 

E 

Ts Factors * 

dee 

Bepth 

Front 

+80 £20.00 

1.0000 

0.000 

A 

a 

4,182.000 

sg 

Ft 

35 

Crual 

0.10 Total Acres 

Feet, 

Topography 

of 

Site 

|X 

[Level 

! 

|Rolling 

H 

Low 

High 

{Water front 

|Ravine 

Wetland 

Flood Plain 

Year 

Co 

Building 

Ass 

Valuej 

5 

EXEMPT{ 

9] 

0 

Land| 

Value 

800 

EXEMPT 

o 

5 

‘Who 

When 

What 

2026 

E 

KDC 

09/05/2024 

DESKTOP 

RE 

2024 

{DM 

07/21/2023 DESKTOP RE | 5055 

*** 

Information herein deemed reliable but 

not guaranteed*** 

Liber 

& 

Page 

12025269436 

Date 

0 

Table 3R303.3R303-NOLAN-GROUP 

B 

Depth 

Rate 

%Adj. 

0 

0.37 

essed 

Value 

800 

XEMPT 

o 

o 

Printed on 

08/19/2026 

i Prent. 

Trans. 

100.0 

Verified 

By 

[DEED 

{Number 

Status 

(10568) 

Value 

0 

1,529 

Reason 

100% 

100 

* denotes 

li 

os 

that 

do not contribute 

to the total acreage calculation. 

Total 

Est. 

Land Value 

1,529 

Taxable 

Value 

800C 

EXEMPT 

0 

0 

Board 

of! 

Tribunal/j 

Review; 

Other: 

800 

)

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

scanswer_valuation.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM

VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-002563

 

Respondent’s Contact Information:

Filer Type:

Local Unit of Government

Local Unit of Government:

City of Detroit (Wayne)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

E-mail Address

 

Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any:

First Name

Cole

M.I. 

Last Name

Brock

Firm Name (if any)

City of Detroit

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

2 Woodward Ave

City or Town

Detroit

State

 Michigan

ZIP Code

48226

Telephone Number

3136544478

E-mail Address

cole.brock@detroitmi.gov

 

 

Subject Property Information:

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings.

 *If necessary, attach a separate sheet.

No 

Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more?

No

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal:

The subject property is a vacant residential lot located in the 303C Hawthorne Neighborhood. It was previously owned by the Detroit Land Bank Authority and 

uncapped this year due to Proposal A. The property is fairly and equitably assessed.

 

Jurisdictional Issues:

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES:

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review?

Yes

If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended:

March

If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? 

*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.

If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

If yes, please cite the Board’s authority?

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact?

No

If yes, please explain

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order?

No

If yes, when was it issued?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE:

When was the Notice of Uncapping issued?

Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped?

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Valuation Information:

Parcel Identification Number:

09021564.

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

 Residential (check one)

Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review:

800

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

800

What do you believe is the fair market value?

1600

What do you believe is the taxable value?

800

 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent’s Signature: 

/s/ Cole Brock

Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature:

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

26-002563 Extend Default (no response).pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Gary L Corbin, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-002563 

 

City of Detroit, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that it entered an order 

holding Petitioner in default on July 8, 2026, because Petitioner failed to pay the fee 

required for the filing of the petition.1 Petitioner was required to cure the default by 

paying the $125.00 filing fee within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, 

yet has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an 

extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with 

Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of 

deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with 

this order.2 Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the 

default: (1) pay the $125.00 fee required for the filing of the petition, (2) file a Motion to 

Set Aside Default, (3) pay the $25.00 fee required for the filing of the motion, and (4) file 

proof the motion was served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with the 

Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order.3 Unfortunately, the payment of petition 

filing fee may not be made via e-filing. 

 

 

1 The order further stated, “Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being 

required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 

2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-002563 

Page 2 of 2 

 

 

Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of the case, as provided by 

TTR 237.4 

 

Entered: August 6, 2026 

 

 

 

 

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm 

kac 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

 

4 See also MCL 205.732.

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC_Order_of_Default_of_Petition.2026-07-08_11-58-29.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Gary L Corbin,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-002563

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner did not pay the required fee for the filing of the petition. See TTR 269. 

Because of this, the appeal is not properly pending. Petitioner must pay the required 

fee for the filing of the petition within 14 days of the entry of this order. A filing fee 

calculator can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the 

payment may not be made via e-filing.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

Entered: July 8, 2026

1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-002563

Page 2 of 4

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

Gary L Corbin

451 West Elza

Hazel Park , MI 48030

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Gary L Corbin,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-002563

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner did not pay the required fee for the filing of the petition. See TTR 269. 

Because of this, the appeal is not properly pending. Petitioner must pay the required 

fee for the filing of the petition within 14 days of the entry of this order. A filing fee 

calculator can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the 

payment may not be made via e-filing.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.2 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

Entered: July 8, 2026

2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

Page 5

MTT Docket No. 26-002563

Page 2 of 2

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Partial_Dismissal_-_Valuation.2026-07-08_11-58-04.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Gary L Corbin,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-002563

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

is appealing assessments for prior tax years and the Tribunal has no authority over 

those assessments under MCL 205.735a, as the petition was not timely filed.1 Further, 

the Tribunal also has no authority over those assessments, as the facts alleged do not 

establish that the assessments were the result of a clerical error (i.e., “an error of a 

transpositional, typographical, or mathematical nature”) or a mutual mistake of fact (i.e., 

“an erroneous belief, which is shared and relied on by both parties”).2 Rather, the facts 

alleged indicate a valuation dispute that does not involve the correction of a clerical 

error or mutual mistake of fact. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s assessment appeal is PARTIALLY DISMISSED. The 

appeal shall continue for the 2026 tax year(s) only.

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

Entered: July 8, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

1 See Electronic Data Systems Corporation v Township of Flint, 253 Mich App 538 (2002). 

2 See International Place Apartments – IV v Ypsilanti Township, 216 Mich App 104, 109 (1996), Ford 

Motor Company v City of Woodhaven, 475 Mich 425, 442 (2006).

Page 2

Gary L Corbin

451 West Elza

Hazel Park , MI 48030

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Gary L Corbin,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-002563

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

is appealing assessments for prior tax years and the Tribunal has no authority over 

those assessments under MCL 205.735a, as the petition was not timely filed.3 Further, 

the Tribunal also has no authority over those assessments, as the facts alleged do not 

establish that the assessments were the result of a clerical error (i.e., “an error of a 

transpositional, typographical, or mathematical nature”) or a mutual mistake of fact (i.e., 

“an erroneous belief, which is shared and relied on by both parties”).4 Rather, the facts 

alleged indicate a valuation dispute that does not involve the correction of a clerical 

error or mutual mistake of fact. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s assessment appeal is PARTIALLY DISMISSED. The 

appeal shall continue for the 2026 tax year(s) only.

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

Entered: July 8, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

3 See Electronic Data Systems Corporation v Township of Flint, 253 Mich App 538 (2002). 

4 See International Place Apartments – IV v Ypsilanti Township, 216 Mich App 104, 109 (1996), Ford 

Motor Company v City of Woodhaven, 475 Mich 425, 442 (2006).

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

RECEIVED 

MAY 99 2026 

NAL 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBY 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / UNCAPPING 

Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricuitural Exemption, Other 

Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of 

Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. 

If you do not submit this document, you may be held in 

default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First Name 

Ml. 

Last Name/Company Name 

Gary 

L 

Corbin 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

451 West Elza 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

HazelPark 

= 

a 

Telephone Number 

137442882 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

| 

First Name 

M.1. 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O, Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send ali correspondence via email} 

Section 3: Subject Property Information suse the multiple parce! form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

How many parcels are you 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

appealing? 

[1 est 

[1 Now 

1 

**|f No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel 

Property Address (No., Street) 

18914 Hawthorne 

City or Town 

County 

State 

ZIP Code

Page 2

Vo 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check ai that appty) 

True Cash and Taxable Value 

[J Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[J Uncapping of Taxable Value 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

i own several properties in the area, and 

i have bought several vacant lots, (such as this 

one) from the Detroit Land Bank Authority and also from private sellers. 

i have paid between $100-250 per lot and have never paid anything close to this 

assessed valuation. 

i can provide a plethera of comps from other sold lots in the same 

area and zip code that have sold for exactly what im claiming this vacant lot is worth. 

i respectfully request that this lot be reduced to the price that 

| and others have paid for 

these similar lots, as this is my one opportunity to do so, as the assesed that 

i have 

been given is 4-8X more what it it worth and that 

i paid. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

Yes 

[0] No 

if Yes, check which BOR you attended: 

March 

[1] July 

[m) December 

If No, please check the applicable reason(s): 

[Hl] Not required to attend 

0 Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutua! Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) 

Od Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 

a Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping 

Other 

if you checked “other” above, explain:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Number: 0994 564. 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal [J (check one) 

Agricultural 

0 

Commercial (0 

Industrial 

J 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover [J 

~~ Developmental [J 

Utility [J (check one) 

Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: 

by the Board of Review: 800 

800 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 

400 

What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash 

What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed 

value by .5) 

200 

assessed value) 200 

Fee Information 

Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at 

issue? 

Yes 

[1 No 

If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

Ifthe property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at 

issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 

will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00 

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$125.00 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

$Over $500,000.00 

$300.00 

If the property is 

NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00 

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. 

If the property is 

NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the 

appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. 

7 

Signature “required 

ZZ 

) 

Petitioner or Attorney/Authoriz 

d Reg, sentafive’s 

Signatyre: 

/ 

Is! 

2 

j 

ZN, 

| =

Page 4

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 105 

Detroit, Michigan 48226 

Phone (313) 628-0722 

Fax: (313) 224-4576 

www.detroitmi.gov 

Fropscty Asfiasraent 1, 

Board of Review 

vv ar 

DETROIT. 

04/06/2026 

CORBIN, GARY

Page 5

Ys

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-07-07_07-29-24.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Gary L Corbin,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-002563

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: July 7, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

Gary L Corbin

451 West Elza

Hazel Park , MI 48030

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Gary L Corbin,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-002563

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: July 7, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

RECEIVED 

MAY 99 2026 

NAL 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBY 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / UNCAPPING 

Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricuitural Exemption, Other 

Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of 

Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. 

If you do not submit this document, you may be held in 

default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First Name 

Ml. 

Last Name/Company Name 

Gary 

L 

Corbin 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

451 West Elza 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

HazelPark 

= 

a 

Telephone Number 

137442882 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

| 

First Name 

M.1. 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O, Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send ali correspondence via email} 

Section 3: Subject Property Information suse the multiple parce! form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

How many parcels are you 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

appealing? 

[1 est 

[1 Now 

1 

**|f No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel 

Property Address (No., Street) 

18914 Hawthorne 

City or Town 

County 

State 

ZIP Code

Page 2

Vo 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check ai that appty) 

True Cash and Taxable Value 

[J Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[J Uncapping of Taxable Value 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

i own several properties in the area, and 

i have bought several vacant lots, (such as this 

one) from the Detroit Land Bank Authority and also from private sellers. 

i have paid between $100-250 per lot and have never paid anything close to this 

assessed valuation. 

i can provide a plethera of comps from other sold lots in the same 

area and zip code that have sold for exactly what im claiming this vacant lot is worth. 

i respectfully request that this lot be reduced to the price that 

| and others have paid for 

these similar lots, as this is my one opportunity to do so, as the assesed that 

i have 

been given is 4-8X more what it it worth and that 

i paid. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

Yes 

[0] No 

if Yes, check which BOR you attended: 

March 

[1] July 

[m) December 

If No, please check the applicable reason(s): 

[Hl] Not required to attend 

0 Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutua! Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) 

Od Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 

a Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping 

Other 

if you checked “other” above, explain:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Number: 0994 564. 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal [J (check one) 

Agricultural 

0 

Commercial (0 

Industrial 

J 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover [J 

~~ Developmental [J 

Utility [J (check one) 

Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: 

by the Board of Review: 800 

800 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 

400 

What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash 

What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed 

value by .5) 

200 

assessed value) 200 

Fee Information 

Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at 

issue? 

Yes 

[1 No 

If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

Ifthe property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at 

issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 

will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00 

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$125.00 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

$Over $500,000.00 

$300.00 

If the property is 

NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00 

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. 

If the property is 

NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the 

appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. 

7 

Signature “required 

ZZ 

) 

Petitioner or Attorney/Authoriz 

d Reg, sentafive’s 

Signatyre: 

/ 

Is! 

2 

j 

ZN, 

| =

Page 4

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 105 

Detroit, Michigan 48226 

Phone (313) 628-0722 

Fax: (313) 224-4576 

www.detroitmi.gov 

Fropscty Asfiasraent 1, 

Board of Review 

vv ar 

DETROIT. 

04/06/2026 

CORBIN, GARY

Page 5

Ys

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.