Gary L Corbin Petitioner V City Of Detroit Respondent
- Petitioner
- Gary L Corbin
- Respondent
- City Of Detroit
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-002563-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Wayne
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Order of Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/10/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 08/19/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Order Extending P's Default | Not recorded | 5 | 08/06/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Order of Default of Petitioner | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/08/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Order of Partial Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/08/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 07/08/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/07/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/26/2026 | $0.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gary L Corbin, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002563 City of Detroit, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioner was placed in default on July 8, 2026, because they did not submit the required petition filing fee.1 On August 6, 2026, the Tribunal extended the time for Petitioner to cure the default by an additional 14 days and they have failed to respond. Petitioner has not complied with either order, and the latter stated that “failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of the case” and referenced Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury.2 In Grimm, the Michigan Court of Appeals summarized factors that the Tribunal should consider before imposing the sanction of dismissal. Those factors are: (1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) the degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) attempts to cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better serve the interests of justice.3 Here, Petitioner’s failure to comply with multiple orders has established a history of deliberate delay. As a result, giving careful consideration to the factors involved and considering all options in determining what sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser sanction would not be appropriate in light of Petitioner’s history of noncompliance in this case. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 1 TTR 269. 2 Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 3 Id. at 149.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002563 Page 2 of 2 APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. Entered: September 10, 2026 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm bw PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
B STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR (1a ty L Cochin MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No._ 26-002243 City of Detroit Respondent(s) PROOF OF SERVICE Cole. Brock states thaton __ 08/]9 /2026 he/she [Name of person serving/mailing petition] [date of service] served a copy of the (fly of Doloit Doster relative to the above-captioned matter upon: [Provide name and address of the party/people being served] Gacy | Corbin US| |) Elza, Hazel fack MI ugozo ld [Signature of person who is serving/mailing copy] Cole Brock . [Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy] MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, Mi 48906
Page 2
Coleman A. Young Municipal Center
Phone: (313) 628-0722
amor —]
Board of Review
2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 105
Fax: (313) 224-4576
DETROIT
Detroit, Michigan 48226
www.detroitmi.gov
04/06/2026
CORBIN, GARY
451 W ELZA AVE
HAZEL PARK MI 48030
RE:
2026 MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW PETITION NUMBER:
M-00286%
The March Board of Review has considered the appeal on the 2026 ass
ent fo) “the below described property
and concluded that:
i
EINDING
OF FACTS:
1.
Parcel Number:
09021564.
at
2.
Property Address:
18914 HAWTHORNE
3.
District:
3
4.
Property Classification:
402
(RESIDENT,
City Land Bank Sale
6.
Principle Residence Exemption:
|
5.
Property Legal Description:
Property exempt from Ad Valorem taxes and assessed on the ¢
Sial Act Roll pursuant to PA 261 of 2003 expiring 12/30/2030. E
HAWTHORNE N 5 FT 100 101 S 10 FT 102 CADILLAGHEIGHTS SUB L33 P81 PLATS,
W C R 9/163 35 X 120
6.
Petitioner timely filed an appeal to the March Board
of Review.
7. The March Board of Review considered’ {if any
‘petitioner's and/or duly authorized representative evidence
and/or testimony. The March Board
iew:gonsidered facts presented as on the assessment roll and/or any
recommendations offered by the Offic
CONCLUSION:
The Board of Review has conside 2
Before Appeal
After Appeal
800
800
800
800
Michigan Tax Tribunal
P.O. Box 30232
Lansing
Mi 48909
A Michigan Tax Tribunal appeal must be made by May 31st
of the current year for properties classified as:
Commercial
Real,
Industrial
Real,
Commercial
Personal,
Industrial
Personal
and
Utility
Personal
Property.
A Michigan Tax Tribunal appeal must be made by July 31st of the current year for Residential Real Property
Classification.
A property Classification appeal may only be made for the current year.
Such appeal may be filed with the
State Tax Commission, PO Box 30471,
Lansing,
MI 48909-7971
by June 30th
of the current year
Sincerely,
City of Detroit Board of Review
02,
023Page 3
Parcel
Number:
09021564.
‘Grantor
Grantee
IDETROIT LAND BANK AUTHORI CORBIN,
GARY
{Property Address
N
18914 HAWTHORNE
[Gwner’s Name/Address
{CORBIN,
GARY
451
W ELZA AVE
‘HAZEL
PARK
MI 48030
Tax Description
Property exempt
from Ad Valorem taxes
and
assessed
on
the Special Act Roll pursuant
‘to
PA 261
of
2003 expiring
12/30/2030.
RE
{HAWTHORNE
N
5
FT
100
101
S
10
FT
102
ADILLAC HEIGHTS
SUB L33
P81
PLATS,
W
C
R
"9/163
35
X
120
!Comments/Influences
3/13/26 MBOR DENIED.
VALUE SUSTAINED.
-LR
9/5/24..PER PICTOMETRY VACANT LOT..KDC
7/21/23 DESKTOP REVIEW- UNABLE
TO
DETERMINE CONDITION OF STRUCTURE
DUE
TO
{TREES OBSTRUCTING VIEW,
FIELD REVIEW
IS
"The Equalizer.
Copyright (c)
1999
— 2009.
«Licensed
To:
City
of Detroit,
County
of
Wayne,
Michigan
EEESMAMSNS
[CEB 02/18/2026 FIELD REVI 2025
Jurisdiction:
CITY
OF DETROIT
County:
WAYNE
sale
sale
Inst.
|Terms
of Sale
Price
Date
{Type
100 09/18/2025 foc
13-GOVERNMENT
iClass: RESIDENTIAL-VACAN Zoning:
R2
Building Permit (s)
School: DETROIT CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
P.R.E. 0%
[
iWARD¥:
09
2026 Est TCV 1,529
|X Vacant
.
Improved
i
Public
Improvements
Dirt Road
Gravel Road
Paved Road
Storm Sewer
Sidewalk
Water
|sewer
Electric
Gas
Curb
Street Lights
Standard Utiliti.
Underground Utils
Land Value Estima##s
for Lad
E
Ts Factors *
dee
Bepth
Front
+80 £20.00
1.0000
0.000
A
a
4,182.000
sg
Ft
35
Crual
0.10 Total Acres
Feet,
Topography
of
Site
|X
[Level
!
|Rolling
H
Low
High
{Water front
|Ravine
Wetland
Flood Plain
Year
Co
Building
Ass
Valuej
5
EXEMPT{
9]
0
Land|
Value
800
EXEMPT
o
5
‘Who
When
What
2026
E
KDC
09/05/2024
DESKTOP
RE
2024
{DM
07/21/2023 DESKTOP RE | 5055
***
Information herein deemed reliable but
not guaranteed***
Liber
&
Page
12025269436
Date
0
Table 3R303.3R303-NOLAN-GROUP
B
Depth
Rate
%Adj.
0
0.37
essed
Value
800
XEMPT
o
o
Printed on
08/19/2026
i Prent.
Trans.
100.0
Verified
By
[DEED
{Number
Status
(10568)
Value
0
1,529
Reason
100%
100
* denotes
li
os
that
do not contribute
to the total acreage calculation.
Total
Est.
Land Value
1,529
Taxable
Value
800C
EXEMPT
0
0
Board
of!
Tribunal/j
Review;
Other:
800
)These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. 26-002563 Respondent’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government: City of Detroit (Wayne) First Name M.I. Last Name Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any: First Name Cole M.I. Last Name Brock Firm Name (if any) City of Detroit Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2 Woodward Ave City or Town Detroit State Michigan ZIP Code 48226 Telephone Number 3136544478 E-mail Address cole.brock@detroitmi.gov Subject Property Information: Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. *If necessary, attach a separate sheet. No Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more? No
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal: The subject property is a vacant residential lot located in the 303C Hawthorne Neighborhood. It was previously owned by the Detroit Land Bank Authority and uncapped this year due to Proposal A. The property is fairly and equitably assessed. Jurisdictional Issues: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES: Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended: March If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, please cite the Board’s authority? Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, please explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? No If yes, when was it issued? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE: When was the Notice of Uncapping issued? Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Valuation Information: Parcel Identification Number: 09021564. Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 800 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 800 What do you believe is the fair market value? 1600 What do you believe is the taxable value? 800 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent’s Signature: /s/ Cole Brock Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gary L Corbin, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002563 City of Detroit, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that it entered an order holding Petitioner in default on July 8, 2026, because Petitioner failed to pay the fee required for the filing of the petition.1 Petitioner was required to cure the default by paying the $125.00 filing fee within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with this order.2 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the default: (1) pay the $125.00 fee required for the filing of the petition, (2) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, (3) pay the $25.00 fee required for the filing of the motion, and (4) file proof the motion was served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order.3 Unfortunately, the payment of petition filing fee may not be made via e-filing. 1 The order further stated, “Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002563 Page 2 of 2 Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of the case, as provided by TTR 237.4 Entered: August 6, 2026 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm kac PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 4 See also MCL 205.732.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gary L Corbin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002563 City of Detroit, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not pay the required fee for the filing of the petition. See TTR 269. Because of this, the appeal is not properly pending. Petitioner must pay the required fee for the filing of the petition within 14 days of the entry of this order. A filing fee calculator can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via e-filing. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: July 8, 2026 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002563 Page 2 of 4 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
Gary L Corbin 451 West Elza Hazel Park , MI 48030
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gary L Corbin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002563 City of Detroit, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not pay the required fee for the filing of the petition. See TTR 269. Because of this, the appeal is not properly pending. Petitioner must pay the required fee for the filing of the petition within 14 days of the entry of this order. A filing fee calculator can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via e-filing. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.2 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: July 8, 2026 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 5
MTT Docket No. 26-002563 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gary L Corbin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002563 City of Detroit, Respondent. ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner is appealing assessments for prior tax years and the Tribunal has no authority over those assessments under MCL 205.735a, as the petition was not timely filed.1 Further, the Tribunal also has no authority over those assessments, as the facts alleged do not establish that the assessments were the result of a clerical error (i.e., “an error of a transpositional, typographical, or mathematical nature”) or a mutual mistake of fact (i.e., “an erroneous belief, which is shared and relied on by both parties”).2 Rather, the facts alleged indicate a valuation dispute that does not involve the correction of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s assessment appeal is PARTIALLY DISMISSED. The appeal shall continue for the 2026 tax year(s) only. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: July 8, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 1 See Electronic Data Systems Corporation v Township of Flint, 253 Mich App 538 (2002). 2 See International Place Apartments – IV v Ypsilanti Township, 216 Mich App 104, 109 (1996), Ford Motor Company v City of Woodhaven, 475 Mich 425, 442 (2006).
Page 2
Gary L Corbin 451 West Elza Hazel Park , MI 48030
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gary L Corbin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002563 City of Detroit, Respondent. ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner is appealing assessments for prior tax years and the Tribunal has no authority over those assessments under MCL 205.735a, as the petition was not timely filed.3 Further, the Tribunal also has no authority over those assessments, as the facts alleged do not establish that the assessments were the result of a clerical error (i.e., “an error of a transpositional, typographical, or mathematical nature”) or a mutual mistake of fact (i.e., “an erroneous belief, which is shared and relied on by both parties”).4 Rather, the facts alleged indicate a valuation dispute that does not involve the correction of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s assessment appeal is PARTIALLY DISMISSED. The appeal shall continue for the 2026 tax year(s) only. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: July 8, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 3 See Electronic Data Systems Corporation v Township of Flint, 253 Mich App 538 (2002). 4 See International Place Apartments – IV v Ypsilanti Township, 216 Mich App 104, 109 (1996), Ford Motor Company v City of Woodhaven, 475 Mich 425, 442 (2006).
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED MAY 99 2026 NAL MICHIGAN TAX TRIBY STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricuitural Exemption, Other Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name Ml. Last Name/Company Name Gary L Corbin Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 451 West Elza City or Town State ZIP Code HazelPark = a Telephone Number 137442882 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information | First Name M.1. Last Name Firm Name (if any) Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O, Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send ali correspondence via email} Section 3: Subject Property Information suse the multiple parce! form for additional, contiguous parcels. How many parcels are you If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? appealing? [1 est [1 Now 1 **|f No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel Property Address (No., Street) 18914 Hawthorne City or Town County State ZIP Code
Page 2
Vo STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check ai that appty) True Cash and Taxable Value [J Taxable Value Only (calculation) [J Uncapping of Taxable Value Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal i own several properties in the area, and i have bought several vacant lots, (such as this one) from the Detroit Land Bank Authority and also from private sellers. i have paid between $100-250 per lot and have never paid anything close to this assessed valuation. i can provide a plethera of comps from other sold lots in the same area and zip code that have sold for exactly what im claiming this vacant lot is worth. i respectfully request that this lot be reduced to the price that | and others have paid for these similar lots, as this is my one opportunity to do so, as the assesed that i have been given is 4-8X more what it it worth and that i paid. Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes [0] No if Yes, check which BOR you attended: March [1] July [m) December If No, please check the applicable reason(s): [Hl] Not required to attend 0 Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutua! Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) Od Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order a Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping Other if you checked “other” above, explain:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 7: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Number: 0994 564. Classification of Property: Real Personal [J (check one) Agricultural 0 Commercial (0 Industrial J Residential Timber-Cutover [J ~~ Developmental [J Utility [J (check one) Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: by the Board of Review: 800 800 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 400 What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed value by .5) 200 assessed value) 200 Fee Information Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at issue? Yes [1 No If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees. Ifthe property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00 If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $125.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $Over $500,000.00 $300.00 If the property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. If the property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. 7 Signature “required ZZ ) Petitioner or Attorney/Authoriz d Reg, sentafive’s Signatyre: / Is! 2 j ZN, | =
Page 4
Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 105 Detroit, Michigan 48226 Phone (313) 628-0722 Fax: (313) 224-4576 www.detroitmi.gov Fropscty Asfiasraent 1, Board of Review vv ar DETROIT. 04/06/2026 CORBIN, GARY
Page 5
Ys
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gary L Corbin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002563 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: July 7, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
Gary L Corbin 451 West Elza Hazel Park , MI 48030
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gary L Corbin, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002563 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: July 7, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED MAY 99 2026 NAL MICHIGAN TAX TRIBY STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricuitural Exemption, Other Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name Ml. Last Name/Company Name Gary L Corbin Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 451 West Elza City or Town State ZIP Code HazelPark = a Telephone Number 137442882 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information | First Name M.1. Last Name Firm Name (if any) Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O, Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send ali correspondence via email} Section 3: Subject Property Information suse the multiple parce! form for additional, contiguous parcels. How many parcels are you If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? appealing? [1 est [1 Now 1 **|f No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel Property Address (No., Street) 18914 Hawthorne City or Town County State ZIP Code
Page 2
Vo STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check ai that appty) True Cash and Taxable Value [J Taxable Value Only (calculation) [J Uncapping of Taxable Value Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal i own several properties in the area, and i have bought several vacant lots, (such as this one) from the Detroit Land Bank Authority and also from private sellers. i have paid between $100-250 per lot and have never paid anything close to this assessed valuation. i can provide a plethera of comps from other sold lots in the same area and zip code that have sold for exactly what im claiming this vacant lot is worth. i respectfully request that this lot be reduced to the price that | and others have paid for these similar lots, as this is my one opportunity to do so, as the assesed that i have been given is 4-8X more what it it worth and that i paid. Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes [0] No if Yes, check which BOR you attended: March [1] July [m) December If No, please check the applicable reason(s): [Hl] Not required to attend 0 Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutua! Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) Od Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order a Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping Other if you checked “other” above, explain:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 7: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Number: 0994 564. Classification of Property: Real Personal [J (check one) Agricultural 0 Commercial (0 Industrial J Residential Timber-Cutover [J ~~ Developmental [J Utility [J (check one) Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: by the Board of Review: 800 800 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 400 What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed value by .5) 200 assessed value) 200 Fee Information Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at issue? Yes [1 No If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees. Ifthe property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00 If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $125.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $Over $500,000.00 $300.00 If the property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. If the property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. 7 Signature “required ZZ ) Petitioner or Attorney/Authoriz d Reg, sentafive’s Signatyre: / Is! 2 j ZN, | =
Page 4
Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 105 Detroit, Michigan 48226 Phone (313) 628-0722 Fax: (313) 224-4576 www.detroitmi.gov Fropscty Asfiasraent 1, Board of Review vv ar DETROIT. 04/06/2026 CORBIN, GARY
Page 5
Ys
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.