Dunia Investment Inc, Petitioner V City Of Dearborn, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Dunia Investment Inc
- Respondent
- City Of Dearborn
Case overview
- Docket number
- 24-003489-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Wayne
- Judge
- Mulchay, Sean
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Order of Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/20/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | Motion to Withdraw Appeal was received. | PET | Not recorded | 06/19/2025 | $0.00 | Download |
| 7 | Notice of Hearing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 04/14/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | A hearing has been scheduled | Not recorded | Not recorded | 04/14/2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| 5 | Notice of Filing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 12/12/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/30/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 09/17/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/17/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/31/2024 | $250.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dunia Investment INC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003489 City Of Dearborn, Respondent. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that the parties have filed a Joint Motion to Withdraw the appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This Order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. By:_____________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: June 20, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dunia Investment INC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003489 City Of Dearborn, Respondent. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that the parties have filed a Joint Motion to Withdraw the appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This Order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. By:_____________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: June 20, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEMS Dunia Investment Inc Petitioner, MTT Docket No. 24-003489 City of Dearborn Respondent, Dear Michigan Tax Tribunal, The Petitioner and the Respondent agree to dismiss the pending appcal for the above docket number. Thank You, - 4 : Dieu 71] Lik. h Miller, PropTax America Datvn Burek Petitioner’s Representative Respondent’s Representative
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dunia Investment INC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No.: 24-003489 City Of Dearborn, Respondent. NOTICE OF IN-PERSON HEARING The Tribunal has scheduled a hearing to be conducted in-person as follows. Hearings are generally 30 minutes in length. HEARING DATE: June 23, 2025 HEARING TIME: 10:30 AM EST HEARING LOCATION: Wayne County-Cadillac Place Building (4) 3026 W Grand Blvd, 2nd Floor Annex, Hearing Room 4 Detroit, MI 48202 This is an important legal document. Please have someone translate the document. Este es un documento legal importante. Por favor, haga traducir este documento. এটি একটি গুরুত্বপূর্ণ আইনি দলিল, অনুগ্রহ করে কেউ দলিলটিকে অনুবাদ করুন। .ةقيثولا مجرتت صخش كيدل ىجري ةماه ةينوناق ةقيثو وه اذه Ito ay isang mahalagang legal na dokumento. Mangyari lamang na magkaroon ng isang tao isalin ang dokumento.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003489 Page 2 of 12 HEARING INFORMATION – PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY GENERAL INFORMATION: An impartial hearing will be conducted in accordance with the Michigan Tax Tribunal Rules (R 792.10201-R 792.10297) and the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act, MCL 24.201 et seq. The Michigan Rules of Evidence and the Michigan Court Rules may be applicable. A party is expected to exercise proper respect and courtesy toward other parties, witnesses and administrative law judges, which includes attending the hearing on time, silencing cell phones, and dressing in appropriate clothing for in-person hearings. The hearing may be recorded for notetaking purposes, but the recording is not a formal record, unless otherwise provided for by the Tribunal. REPRESENTATION: You may have an attorney or anyone else of your choice represent you at the hearing. The Tribunal does not recommend or appoint representatives for you and will not pay for your representative. WITNESSES: You may have anyone join you at the hearing to speak in support of your case. However, the time to present your case is limited and additional time may not be provided to accommodate witness testimony. DOCUMENTATION: Parties are required to submit all documents in support of their contentions to the Tribunal and the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents were previously submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be submitted by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to submission by e-mail. If sent by mail, the documents must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized representative at the address identified in the petition or answer for that party or authorized representative, unless the party or authorized representative filed an appearance or other documentation identifying a different mailing address. The documents do not need to be resubmitted after the Notice of Hearing if they were previously submitted to the Tribunal and the opposing party. If a hearing had previously been scheduled in this case and adjourned, and the adjournment order indicates that the parties are precluded from submitting any further documentary evidence, no further documentary evidence will be accepted even if filed and exchanged, as indicated above. Inclusion of Subsequent Tax Years: Subsequent tax year assessments are automatically included in a valuation appeal once the assessment has been established for that tax year unless the Tribunal grants the exclusion of the subsequent tax year. For purposes of administrative efficiency, the Tribunal considers this date April 1st. As such, the parties should be prepared to discuss all additional assessments at hearings to be conducted on or after April 1st. If the hearing is to be conducted prior to April 1st, taxpayers would be required to file a new petition and, if necessary, protest the subsequent tax year assessment at the March Board of Review for that tax year. MOTIONS/REQUESTS: A motion is a written request filed by a party asking the Tribunal to take certain action. The following motions and requests (including subpoenas) may be filed by either party regarding the scheduled hearing. Motions and requests may be submitted by mail or through the Tribunal’s “e-filing” system, if available. If a motion or request is not granted or the Tribunal has not notified you that it has been granted, you are required to attend the hearing. 1. Motion to Adjourn: A party may request the hearing be rescheduled (i.e. adjourned). The motion must be submitted to the Tribunal and the opposing party at least 28 days before the hearing unless there are emergency circumstances. The emergency circumstances must be detailed to justify the granting of what would otherwise be considered a late motion. A $25 fee is required for the filing of the motion unless the case involves the valuation of property and the property at issue had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed, for the tax years at issue, or the sole issue being appealed relates to a
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 24-003489 Page 3 of 12 poverty exemption. If the motion is not granted or the Tribunal has not notified the parties that it has been granted, the parties are required to attend the hearing. 2. Hear on File Option: If a party is unable to attend a hearing, that party may participate in the hearing by submitting a written request asking to have that party’s side of the case “heard on the file”. The request must be submitted to the Tribunal
Page 4
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dunia Investment INC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003489 City Of Dearborn, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003489 Page 2 of 8 If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or email taxtrib@michigan.gov. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: December 12, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dunia Investment INC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003489 City Of Dearborn, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage
Page 4
MTT
Page 5
S
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-003489 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City Of Dearborn (WAYNE) First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Jacob M.I. C Last Name Thurston Firm Name (if any) City of Dearborn Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 16901 Michigan Avenue Suite 5 City or Town Dearborn State Michigan ZIP Code 48126 Telephone Number 313-542-4390 Fax Number E-mail Address jthurston@dearborn.gov Section 3: Subject Property Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? No Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. N/A Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Respondent will verify and review all pertinent data as well as provide further evidence, if needed, prior to the hearing. Attachment: 2024 Assessment Change Notice, petitioner did not appear before the City of Dearborn 2024 Board of Review. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? No If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, cite the Board’s authority. Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, explain. Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? If so, what is the issue date? No IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 821017116016 Classification of Property: Real Commercial Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 253700 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 232643 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 507400 Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 253700 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 232643 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Jacob Thurston
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR 1 ANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name MI Last Name/Company Name Dunia Investment Inc Malling Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name M.1. Last Name Sam Miller Firm Name (if any) PropTax Ameri ca Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 26923 Havelock City or Town State ZIP Code Dearborn Heights MI [48127 Telephone Number Fax Number 313-377-1447 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) nassco123@yahoo.com Section 3: Subject Property Information How many If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? parcelsareyou | [7] ves* [] No** appealing? *If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check at that apply) True Cash and Taxable Value 1 Poverty Exemption O Taxable Value Only (calculation) [J Disabled Veterans Exemption 0 Uncapping of Taxable Value [J Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) [] Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a [J Classification Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal SEV is too high Section 6: Jurisdictional issues Year(s) you are appealing: 2024 Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [i] Yes No If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [_] March [] July [7] December if No, check the applicable reason(s): Not required to attend [| Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner [I] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) [] Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order [m] Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information suse the multipte parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
Parcel Identification Number:
82-10-171-16-016
Classification of Property:
Reali
Personal
(check one)
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
Current Assessed o. {also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:
253,700
Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:
232,643
What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?
307,400
Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here, This is your contention of Assessed Value.
153,700
If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, anter your contention of Taxable Value.
78,943
Section 8: Classification Information *Only the M) Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunat*
Parcet Identification Number:
Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:
Real
Personal
(check one)
0
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
What do you believe is the property's classification?
Real
Personal
(check one)
im!
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
{check one)
if improved property, how is the property currently being used?
Ifimproved property, for what use was the property designed?Page 4
fre STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON i. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? [J ves No Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 0 Yes No If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees, The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention wili be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Vaiue or Taxable Value in contention Is; Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $125.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $0ver $500,000.00 $300.00 (fyour property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: $100,000.00 and under * Pius $25.00 for each additional parce}, as indicated above. If your property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $400,000.01 or greater the appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal
Page 5
ITED
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dunia Investment INC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003489 City Of Dearborn, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: September 17, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dunia Investment INC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003489 City Of Dearborn, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: September 17, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR 1 ANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name MI Last Name/Company Name Dunia Investment Inc Malling Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name M.1. Last Name Sam Miller Firm Name (if any) PropTax Ameri ca Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 26923 Havelock City or Town State ZIP Code Dearborn Heights MI [48127 Telephone Number Fax Number 313-377-1447 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) nassco123@yahoo.com Section 3: Subject Property Information How many If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? parcelsareyou | [7] ves* [] No** appealing? *If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check at that apply) True Cash and Taxable Value 1 Poverty Exemption O Taxable Value Only (calculation) [J Disabled Veterans Exemption 0 Uncapping of Taxable Value [J Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) [] Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a [J Classification Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal SEV is too high Section 6: Jurisdictional issues Year(s) you are appealing: 2024 Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [i] Yes No If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [_] March [] July [7] December if No, check the applicable reason(s): Not required to attend [| Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner [I] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) [] Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order [m] Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information suse the multipte parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
Parcel Identification Number:
82-10-171-16-016
Classification of Property:
Reali
Personal
(check one)
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
Current Assessed o. {also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:
253,700
Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:
232,643
What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?
307,400
Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here, This is your contention of Assessed Value.
153,700
If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, anter your contention of Taxable Value.
78,943
Section 8: Classification Information *Only the M) Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunat*
Parcet Identification Number:
Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:
Real
Personal
(check one)
0
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
What do you believe is the property's classification?
Real
Personal
(check one)
im!
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
{check one)
if improved property, how is the property currently being used?
Ifimproved property, for what use was the property designed?Page 4
fre STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON i. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? [J ves No Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 0 Yes No If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees, The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention wili be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Vaiue or Taxable Value in contention Is; Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $125.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $0ver $500,000.00 $300.00 (fyour property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: $100,000.00 and under * Pius $25.00 for each additional parce}, as indicated above. If your property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $400,000.01 or greater the appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal
Page 5
ITED
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.