David W Reilly Petitioner V Township Of West Bloomfield Respondent

Page 1

RECEIVED 

SEP 0 1 2026 

Eat 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

BMICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

David W Reilly 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No.26-002278 

Township of West Bloomfield 

i 

Respondent(s) 

REQUEST FOR INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 

1. 

1am requesting an informal settlement conference be scheduled and held to discuss this 

case. 

2. 

A hearing has not yet been scheduled in this case. 

3. Name of Requestor: David 

W Reilly 

Regquestor's Phone Number: 

248 802-6044 

Requestor's Email (if any): dreilly@goodwilldetroit.org 

4. 

The requester is the: 

[A Taxpayer 

[CJLocat Unit of Government 

[J Authorized Representative of 

No, 

Requestor Signatlire 

& [2c 

zl 

Date

Page 2

Page 2 of 2 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

ok 

| certify that on this date 

Nog [A 20 2(., 

| served a copy of this request on 

mm, 

a6) 1854-0 of Lest Blumb 18) 

(the opposing party if not represented or their 

representative) by: 

[Personal Delivery [] First Ciass Mail [_] Registered or Certified Mail or 

["] Other Designated Delivery Service (UPS, FedEx) 

& (20 /2¢ 

AY. 

Date 

Signature 

/ 

*A copy of this request must also be filed with the Michigan Tax Tribunal. 

Mailing Address: 611 W. Ottawa St., Lansing, Mi 48933 

Overnight Carrier Address (UPS, FedEx, DHL Deliveries): 

2nd Floor MTT, 2407 N. Grand River Avenue, Lansing, Ml 48906 

E-Filing: https:/eFiling.apps.lara.state.mi.us

Page 3

Rg: Hy 

(£89 Resedile sk 

Qes7 Blan Frld MT ygz2y 

YHYl 

9207 

| € INV 

peAieoey 

METROPLEX MI # 

US POSTAGEM PITNEY 

28 AUG 2026041 pees (=E== 

oar eATE gzip 48298 

$ 000.7

0006229659 

AUG 

26 

7 

iw 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

611 W. Ottawa St. 

Lansing, M148933 

Ppt dpjed]ifiag 

fledged] 

i

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

David W Reilly, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-002278 

 

West Bloomfield Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER SETTING ASIDE PETITIONER’S DEFAULT 

 

On June 22, 2026, Petitioner filed a Small Claims petition in response to the Tribunal’s 

June 11, 2026 Order of Default.1 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioner was held in 

default for failing to file a Small Claims petition form. Petitioner timely responded to the 

Order of Default and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing the 

default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s website at 

www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the document 

link next to line-item No. 7. 

 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s default is SET ASIDE. 

 

 

Entered: August 26, 2026 

 

 

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm 

kac 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

 

1 The Tribunal notes that Petitioner indicated an intent to appeal the 2025 tax year. However, on June 11, 

2026, the Tribunal issued an Order of Partial Dismissal concluding that it lacked jurisdiction over the 2025 

tax year, and that order remains in effect.

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

David W Reilly,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-002278

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an 

appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan 

Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan 

Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal 

settlement conference process.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-002278

Page 2 of 2

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or 

email taxtrib@michigan.gov.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: August 26, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

David W Reilly,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-002278

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or

Page 4

M

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUN 25 2026 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

LANSING 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / UNCAPPING 

MTT DOCKET NO. _ 26 - 602218 

Section 1: Respondent's Contact Information 

Unit of Government 

od 1. Rely 

Maiiing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box of Rural Route): 

1589 

Ross0als 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

West Bloom 

br std 

Mi | 4gzYy 

Telgphone WW: 

248) 

go2- coy 

Email Address (do not enter unlgss you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

EI Qe 9 

alle to 

alg 

Section 2: Respondent's Attorney/Authorized Representative’ s Contact Information 

First Name: 

LEM 

Last Name: 

Firm Name (if any): 

Mailing Address (No:, Street, P.D. Box or Rural Route); 

, 

= 

:'. 

BS 

EE 

Sa 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Telephone Number: 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

If no, fist all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Attacha 

separate sheet if necessary. 

O Yes 

} No 

x Not Applicable 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more for all tax years at issue?

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON i. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

NoTicy ob Docks? Nomlc 

MTT 26-002278 

ou Clulec 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [v] Yes 

od No 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: ® March 

[| July 

1 December 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [Wl] Yes 

[I] No 

If yes, cite the Board's authority. 

Was the assessment at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? x Yes 

[i] No 

yes, owin p 

Doe claasey vacad fash wy 24 4 

the 

TV, dng 

(desftochl, A 

LHe Conbuith 1 

2.02€ 

AleedS 

Ad 

Tus 

Dias 

262 

Is Petitioner appealing from a 

State Tax Commission Order? 

[J Yes 

Mo 

If so, what is the issue date? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE 

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? 

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? 

Section 6: Valuation Information suse ine multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Number: A-18-~ 03 - joH- 829 

Classification of Property: 

Real] 

Personal (J (check one)

Page 3

David Reilly 

1589 Rosedale St 

W Bloomfield, MI 483241276 

METROPLEX MI 480 

22 JUN 2026 

AMS 

L 

8g 

8 

= 

8 

= 

3 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

oo 

= 

611 W. Ottawa St. 

Lansing, M1 48933 

mem ree 

aby faglosgfhygesssbosdog 

0) 

Lae a flobe Joly 

10

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUN 2 5 2025 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / UNCAPPING 

Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other 

Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of 

Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. 

If you do not submit this document, you may be held in 

default. 

Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information 

Nacler #1 26 -002218 

Firgt 

Name 

MI 

Last Nam®/Company Name 

Av: 0 

vw 

Kes 1 y 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rurai Route) 

1689 

Rosepals 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

best 8 loomfisin 

ML | 483Y 

248) Bo - Codi 

Email Addréss (do not enter unless you want MTT b send 

ali correspondence via email) 

11 

rectly 

© 

esdunllo 

Las 

7 

Vv 

py} 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact information 

First Name 

ML 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Email Address (do nat enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information *use the multiple parcei form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

How many parcels are you 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

appealing? 

[J vest 

[1] No 

{ 

**if No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel 

Property Address (No., Street) 

158% 

RoSenals 

2ZiP Code

Page 2

El 

AE 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing heck aii that apply) 

. 

[1 True Cash and Taxable Value 

x Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

1 Uncapping of Taxable Value 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

oper of Difolt 

elnlee 

© 7T Qukek ¥ 

26 - 001218 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Oid you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 2] Yes 

[0] No 

Hf Yes, check which BOR you attended: [7 March 

J July 

[a] December 

If No, please check the applicable reason(s): 

[] Notrequired to attend 

[Hl] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) 

[ml] Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 

[| Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping 

J other 

If you checked “other” above, explain:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

) 

m7 26-0022712 

Section 7: Valuation Information =use the multipte parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Number: X-18.03~ 104 029 

Classification of Property: 

Real] 

Personal [] (check one) 

Agricultural 

3 

Commercial 

J 

Industrial [J 

Residential 5 

Timber-Cutover [J 

Developmental [1 

Utility [1 (check one) 

Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: 

by the Board of Review: 

213, 70 

228 

, 45 

What do you believe Is the fair market value {also known as true cash value)? 

337,866 

What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash 

What do you believe is the taxable value? {cannot exceed 

value by .5) 

MM 8 93 3 

assessed value) 

{ 68 9 33 

Fee Information 

Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at 

issue? 

XI ves 

1 no 

If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

If the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at 

issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 

will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a totai filing fee of $1,000.00 

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee Is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$125.00 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

$Over $500,000.00 

$300.00 

if the property is 

NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00 

* plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. 

if the property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Vaiue or Taxable Value in dispute

Page 4

S

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

Michigan Department of Treasury, 

STC 1019 (Rev, 10-17) 

THIS 

IS NOT A TAX BILL 

Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification 

This form is issued under the authority of P.A. 206 of 1893, Sec. 211.24 (c) and Sec.211.34c, as amended. This is a model assessment notice to be used by the local assessor. 

L-4400 

FROM 

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION 

X -18-03-104-029 

CHARTER TWP OF WEST BLOOMFIELD 

ROBERT SCRIPTURE, ASSESSOR 

4550 WALNUT LAKE ROAD 

WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48323 

PARCEL CODE NUMBER: 

PROPERTY ADDRESS: 

1589 ROSEDALE 

WEST BLOOMFIELD 

, MI 48324 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION 

% Exempt As "Homeowners Principal Residence”: 

 100.00% 

REILLY, DAVID 

% Exempt As "Qualified Agricultural Property": 

.00% 

1589 ROSEDALE 

o 

" 

. 

" 

0 

WEST BLOOMFIELD MI 48324 

% Exempt 

As "MBT Industrial Personal... 

.00% 

% Exempt As "MBT Commercial Personal™........... 

.00% 

Exempt As "Qualified Forest Property": 

[1 Yes 

No 

_| THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS:401 

(RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) 

SCHOOL DISTRICT: WEST BLOOMFIELD SCHOOL DIST. 

PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION IF DIFFERENT: 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) 

Your assessment was based on market adjustment. 

The change in Taxable Value will mcrease/decroase your 2026 tax 

PRIOR og 

NT 

& RR 

se 

NT 

CHANGE 

bill by approximately: 

227.57 

based on the 2025 tax rates. 

1. TAXABLE VALUE (Current amount is tentative): 

225,451 

231,538 

6,087 

2. ASSESSED VALUE: 

273,570 

279,420 

5,850 

3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 

1.000 

4. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (Current amount is tentative): 

273,570 

279,420 

5,850 

5. There WAS/WAS NOT a transfer of ownership on this property in 2025: 

WAS NOT 

6. ASSESSOR CHANGE REASON: Market Adjustment, Parcel Review 

The 2026 Inflation Rate Multiplier is: 1.027. 

Property taxes are calculated on the Taxable Value (see line 

1 above). The Taxable Value number entered in the "Change from Prior 

Year to Current Year" column, does not indicate a change in your taxes. This number indicates the change in the Taxable Value. 

State Equalized Value (SEV) is the Assessed Value (see line 2 above) multiplied by the Equalization Factor, if any (see line 3 above). 

State Equalized Value must approximate 50% of market value (see line 4 above). 

IF THERE WAS A TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP (see line 5 above) on your property in 2025, your 2026 Taxable Value will be the same 

as your 2026 State Equalized Value. 

IF THERE WAS NOT A TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP 

on your property in 2025, your 2026 Taxable Value is calculated by multiplying 

your 2025 Taxable Value (see line 

1 above) by 1.027 (Inflation Rate Multiplier for the current year). Physical changes in your property 

may also increase or decrease your Taxable Value. Your 2026 Taxable Value cannot be higher than your 2026 State Equalized Value. 

March Board of Review Appeal Information: 

The Taxable Value, the Assessed Value, the State Equalized Value, the Property Classification, or the Transfer of Ownership may be 

appealed by filing a protest with the local Board of Review. 

Protests are made to the Board of Review by completing a Board of Review 

Petition Form. 

A Petition Form may be obtained directly from the local unit or from the State Tax Commission at www.michigan.gov/taxes. 

Click on Forms (at top of page) then click on Property Tax, then click on Board of Review to obtain Form 618 (L-4035). 

To schedule an appointment for an appeal in person please call: 248-451-4850 by March 6, 2026. 

Any questions regarding your assessment, please call 248-451-4850 or by email at AskAssessing@wbtownship.org. For additional 

information, please visit our website at www.wbtownship.org. Appointments are available in date order. 

The Board of Review meeting schedule is: 

March 

3, 2026-9:00 AM to 11:00 AM-Organizational Meeting (No Public Hearings) 

March 

4,2026 

9:00 AMto 

1:00 PM 

3:00 PM to 9:00 PM 

March 

5,2026 

9:00 AM to 11:00 AM 

1:00 PM to 4:00 PM 

N 

i 

Reem 

J 

March 

6, 2026 

9:00 AM to 11:00 AM 

1:00 PM to 4:00 PM 

West Bloomfield Township Assessing Department 

March 

9,2026 

9:00 AMto 

1:00 PM 

3:00 PM to 9:00 PM 

March 

10,2026 

9:00 AM to 11:00 AM 

1:00 PM to 3:00 PM 

Not 

less than 14 days before the meeting of the Board of Review, the assessment notice shall be mailed to the property owner. 

Instead of a personal appearance you may file a written appeal by March 6, 2026. 

Please submit the following information with your signed letter and/or attachments: 

1) Reason for appeal, 2) Documents supporting 

reason for appeal, 3) Copy of this notice (or reference Property Identification Number on all correspondence), 4) Full contact information 

including telephone number. Agents representing a Taxpayer must provide the Board of Review with a current letter of authorization. 

The denial of an exemption from the local school operating tax for "qualified agricultural properties" may be appealed to the local Board of 

Review. The denial of

Page 2

CO

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM

VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-002278

 

Respondent’s Contact Information:

Filer Type:

Local Unit of Government

Local Unit of Government:

Township Of West Bloomfield (OAKLAND)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

E-mail Address

 

Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any:

First Name

Robert

M.I. 

Last Name

Scripture

Firm Name (if any)

Charter Township of West Bloomfield

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

4550 Walnut Lake Rd

City or Town

West Bloomfield

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48323

Telephone Number

2484514850

E-mail Address

taxtribunal@wbtownship.org

 

 

Subject Property Information:

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings.

 *If necessary, attach a separate sheet.

N/A 

Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more?

Yes

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal:

The respondent will prepare a Valuation Disclosure and may conduct a site inspection before the hearing.

 

Jurisdictional Issues:

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES:

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review?

Yes

If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended:

March

If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? 

*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.

If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

If yes, please cite the Board’s authority?

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact?

No

If yes, please explain

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order?

No

If yes, when was it issued?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE:

When was the Notice of Uncapping issued?

Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped?

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Valuation Information:

Parcel Identification Number:

18-03-104-029

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

 Residential (check one)

Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review:

279420

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

231538

What do you believe is the fair market value?

558840

What do you believe is the taxable value?

 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent’s Signature: 

/s/ Robert Scripture

Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature:

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

David W Reilly,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-002278

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner filed an ET sample petition for the issue being appealed. See TTR 279 and 

TTR 269. Because of this, the appeal is not properly pending. Petitioner must 

complete and return the appropriate Small Claims petition form for the issue being 

appealed within 14 days of the entry of this order. The petition shall note the docket 

number assigned by the Tribunal. Small Claims petition forms can be found on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.i 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: June 11, 2026

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-002278

Page 2 of 2

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

David W Reilly,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-002278

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner filed an ET sample petition for the issue being appealed. See TTR 279 and 

TTR 269. Because of this, the appeal is not properly pending. Petitioner must 

complete and return the appropriate Small Claims petition form for the issue being 

appealed within 14 days of the entry of this order. The petition shall note the docket 

number assigned by the Tribunal. Small Claims petition forms can be found on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.ii 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: June 11, 2026

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

ii “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 26-002278

Page 2 of 2

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

~zCEIVED 

MAR 3 1 2026 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Nav. D 

W. 

Re. 

ly 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No. 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No: 

_ X - 18 ~a3-~ 104 - 029 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

The property identified above is )X_real ____personal. 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? __ Yes __ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- 

contiguous parcel.) 

4. 

Are all.of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? 

X Yes __ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel! of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

Featomy 

, 2026 

© Maict Bonigy of Revides Diergroy Cattaclion) 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as 

“ol 

(Res Dgahal - piessd)

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

8. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

The property or properties at issue are located in 

oaklaan 

_County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

158% Roseonle ST, 

West BloomFatg, MI 

48324 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): CHARTER 

J 

of 

West 

ET) 

Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 

158% Lpstdale st, Wes Bloombears mr 48324 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

xX 

the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? 

X 

Yes __ No

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 

Page 3 of 4 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior 

tax year or vears (attach additional page if necessary): 

fq tv =T12¢, 800 

x Le3v 

s/h 

©130433 

: 

25 

Tv 

shh Jig %e ('h porchase) r 130,433 2 

¥ 108,933 

20 

TV sly £168,933 

* Loz) = 

F433 oon 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

2628 

_ 

213%, 5306 

225 451 

2626 

2,793,420 

231,538 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

1025 

£8 123 

| 2026 

£33994 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

| True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value | 

2025 

56.51% 

026 

5% 04H 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

CMaage 

To 24 

to 

#173 4%) 

pou HO]

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 

Page 4 of 4 

Sign PPS 

of he ryunenzed Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

iy Name of Petitioner Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

: 

auc 

J 

edt 

Email Address: 

ell, ® 

goed wld 

bret 

aig 

J 

Mailing Address: 

183 

psedals 

sh. 

WeST 

Blogem 62610 M7 

8314 

Telephone Number: 

( 24 g) 

E02 - Co4H 

Date: 

3/2¢ he

Page 5

** 

Notice of March Board of Review Decision ** 

FROM 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WEST BLOOMFIELD 

(248) 451-4850 

3/17/2026 

BOARD OF REVIEW 

4550 WALNUT LAKE ROAD 

WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48323 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

REILLY, DAVID 

PROPERTY 

1589 ROSEDALE 

IDENTIFICATION: 

WEST BLOOMFIELD Mi 48324 

X -18-03-104-029 

SCHOOL DISTRICT: 

WEST BLOOMFIELD SCHOOL DIST. 

PROPERTY ADDRESS: 

1589 ROSEDALE 

THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIEDAS 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) 

PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION IF DIFFERENT: 

HOMESTEAD PERCENT: 

100% 

The Board of Review has examined your 2026 Assessed Value and/or Capped Value and has made the following decision. 

PETITION NUMBER: 

30 

DATE: 

03/05/2026 

CHANGE REASON: 

Assessment Determined to be Ac 

FROM 

70 

CHANGE 

1, ASSESSED VALUE: 

279.420 

279.420 

0 

2. CAPPED VALUE: 

231,538 

231,538 

0 

3. TAXABLE

Page 6

ST

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

David W Reilly,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-002278

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

is appealing assessments for prior tax years and the Tribunal has no authority over 

those assessments under MCL 205.735a, as the petition was not timely filed.1 Further, 

the Tribunal also has no authority over those assessments, as the facts alleged do not 

establish that the assessments were the result of a clerical error (i.e., “an error of a 

transpositional, typographical, or mathematical nature”) or a mutual mistake of fact (i.e., 

“an erroneous belief, which is shared and relied on by both parties”).2 Rather, the facts 

alleged indicate a valuation dispute that does not involve the correction of a clerical 

error or mutual mistake of fact. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s assessment appeal is PARTIALLY DISMISSED. The 

appeal shall continue for the 2026 tax year(s) only.

By:___________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: June 11, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

1 See Electronic Data Systems Corporation v Township of Flint, 253 Mich App 538 (2002). 

2 See International Place Apartments – IV v Ypsilanti Township, 216 Mich App 104, 109 (1996), Ford 

Motor Company v City of Woodhaven, 475 Mich 425, 442 (2006).

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

David W Reilly,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-002278

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

is appealing assessments for prior tax years and the Tribunal has no authority over 

those assessments under MCL 205.735a, as the petition was not timely filed.3 Further, 

the Tribunal also has no authority over those assessments, as the facts alleged do not 

establish that the assessments were the result of a clerical error (i.e., “an error of a 

transpositional, typographical, or mathematical nature”) or a mutual mistake of fact (i.e., 

“an erroneous belief, which is shared and relied on by both parties”).4 Rather, the facts 

alleged indicate a valuation dispute that does not involve the correction of a clerical 

error or mutual mistake of fact. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s assessment appeal is PARTIALLY DISMISSED. The 

appeal shall continue for the 2026 tax year(s) only.

By:___________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: June 11, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

3 See Electronic Data Systems Corporation v Township of Flint, 253 Mich App 538 (2002). 

4 See International Place Apartments – IV v Ypsilanti Township, 216 Mich App 104, 109 (1996), Ford 

Motor Company v City of Woodhaven, 475 Mich 425, 442 (2006).

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

David W Reilly,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-002278

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: June 11, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

David W Reilly,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-002278

Township Of West Bloomfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: June 11, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

~zCEIVED 

MAR 3 1 2026 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Nav. D 

W. 

Re. 

ly 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No. 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No: 

_ X - 18 ~a3-~ 104 - 029 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

The property identified above is )X_real ____personal. 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? __ Yes __ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- 

contiguous parcel.) 

4. 

Are all.of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? 

X Yes __ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel! of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

Featomy 

, 2026 

© Maict Bonigy of Revides Diergroy Cattaclion) 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as 

“ol 

(Res Dgahal - piessd)

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

8. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

The property or properties at issue are located in 

oaklaan 

_County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

158% Roseonle ST, 

West BloomFatg, MI 

48324 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): CHARTER 

J 

of 

West 

ET) 

Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 

158% Lpstdale st, Wes Bloombears mr 48324 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

xX 

the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? 

X 

Yes __ No

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 

Page 3 of 4 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior 

tax year or vears (attach additional page if necessary): 

fq tv =T12¢, 800 

x Le3v 

s/h 

©130433 

: 

25 

Tv 

shh Jig %e ('h porchase) r 130,433 2 

¥ 108,933 

20 

TV sly £168,933 

* Loz) = 

F433 oon 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

2628 

_ 

213%, 5306 

225 451 

2626 

2,793,420 

231,538 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

1025 

£8 123 

| 2026 

£33994 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

| True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value | 

2025 

56.51% 

026 

5% 04H 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

CMaage 

To 24 

to 

#173 4%) 

pou HO]

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 

Page 4 of 4 

Sign PPS 

of he ryunenzed Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

iy Name of Petitioner Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

: 

auc 

J 

edt 

Email Address: 

ell, ® 

goed wld 

bret 

aig 

J 

Mailing Address: 

183 

psedals 

sh. 

WeST 

Blogem 62610 M7 

8314 

Telephone Number: 

( 24 g) 

E02 - Co4H 

Date: 

3/2¢ he

Page 5

** 

Notice of March Board of Review Decision ** 

FROM 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WEST BLOOMFIELD 

(248) 451-4850 

3/17/2026 

BOARD OF REVIEW 

4550 WALNUT LAKE ROAD 

WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48323 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

REILLY, DAVID 

PROPERTY 

1589 ROSEDALE 

IDENTIFICATION: 

WEST BLOOMFIELD Mi 48324 

X -18-03-104-029 

SCHOOL DISTRICT: 

WEST BLOOMFIELD SCHOOL DIST. 

PROPERTY ADDRESS: 

1589 ROSEDALE 

THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIEDAS 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) 

PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION IF DIFFERENT: 

HOMESTEAD PERCENT: 

100% 

The Board of Review has examined your 2026 Assessed Value and/or Capped Value and has made the following decision. 

PETITION NUMBER: 

30 

DATE: 

03/05/2026 

CHANGE REASON: 

Assessment Determined to be Ac 

FROM 

70 

CHANGE 

1, ASSESSED VALUE: 

279.420 

279.420 

0 

2. CAPPED VALUE: 

231,538 

231,538 

0 

3. TAXABLE

Page 6

ST

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.