Full record / 26-002278 Extend Default (response).pdf

26-002278 Extend Default (response).pdf

David W Reilly Petitioner V Township Of West Bloomfield Respondent · 26-002278-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

David W Reilly, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-002278 

 

West Bloomfield Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER SETTING ASIDE PETITIONER’S DEFAULT 

 

On June 22, 2026, Petitioner filed a Small Claims petition in response to the Tribunal’s 

June 11, 2026 Order of Default.1 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioner was held in 

default for failing to file a Small Claims petition form. Petitioner timely responded to the 

Order of Default and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing the 

default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s website at 

www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the document 

link next to line-item No. 7. 

 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s default is SET ASIDE. 

 

 

Entered: August 26, 2026 

 

 

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm 

kac 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

 

1 The Tribunal notes that Petitioner indicated an intent to appeal the 2025 tax year. However, on June 11, 

2026, the Tribunal issued an Order of Partial Dismissal concluding that it lacked jurisdiction over the 2025 

tax year, and that order remains in effect.

PDF reading copy

← View full record