David Chester Huhn, Petitioner V Township Of Sunfield, Respondent

Page 1

RECEIVED 

AUG 1 9 2026 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

David Chester Huhn 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000382 

Township Of Sunfield 

s 

Respondent(s) 

SUBSTITUTION OF ASSESSOR 

Use this form to report changes regarding assessors of record of local units of government. 

Complete all sections that apply. This form must be completed in every case there is a 

substitution. The completed form must be filed with the Tribunal and served on the opposing 

party or their representative. 

1. Full name (first, middle initial, last) 

Hayden R Struckmeyer 

2. Firm Name (if applicable) 

3. Address PO BOX 175, Lowell MI 49331 

4. Telephone No. 

5. E-mail Address 

(616)987-0067 

assessorhoffman@gmail.com 

6. Local Unit of Government 

Sunfield Township, Eaton County 

Hayden Struckmeyer 

[Print/type name of person signing] 

PROOF OF SERVICE

Page 2

David Chester Huhn 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000382 

Township of Sunfield 

Respondent. 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Sunfield Township Assessor, Hayden Struckmeyer states that on 08/17/2026 she served a copy 

via certified priority mail the SUBSTITUTION OF ASSESSOR relative to the above-captioned 

matter upon: 

David Chester Huhn, Petitioner 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

7313 W Mt Hope HWY 

PO BOX 30232 

Mulliken, M1 48861 

Lansing, M1 48909 

Hayden Struckmeyer,Sunfield Townédhip Assessor 

Dated: 08/17/2026

Page 3

SOK 

PORV1D 

LOREM, 

MA HOZA 

MCh1ooN 

0 Trina 

v0 BOX BOZ5Z 

LONGO M304

Page 4

PMD 8/17/26 per tracking

| 

L 

6014 

EP14W October 2023 

| 

PS0000103 

ppt pms

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

David Chester Huhn,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000382

Township Of Sunfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Users who file documents with the Michigan Tax Tribunal are advised that filed 

documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tax 

Docket Lookup. Users who file documents are responsible for ensuring sensitive or 

personal identifying information is withheld or redacted. See TTR 209. If a user wishes 

to file a document for consideration by the Michigan Tax Tribunal and prevent its 

publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order 

under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the 

Order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order 

will be published.

The responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from 

all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and 

their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or 

screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A 

party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may 

request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously-filed document by

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-000382

Page 2 of 2

submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form will be 

available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of our website. 

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an 

appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan 

Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan 

Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal 

settlement conference process.

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or 

email taxtrib@michigan.gov.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: 

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

David Chester Huhn,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000382

Township Of Sunfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a

Page 4

MTT

Page 5

ST

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

WAY 2.6 202 

MICHIGAN 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

TAX TRI BUNAL 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / UNCAPPING 

MTT DOCKET NO. 2¢ 

- 600382. 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

Unit of Government 

Sunfield Township 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

145 Main St 

P.O. Box 68 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Sunfield 

MI 

48890 

Telephone Number: 989-666-21 59 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

rzemlajr@gmail.com 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

1 

First Name: 

Mm. 

Last Name: 

Richard 

ati 

Firm 

Name 

(any) 

i 

i 

re 

Accurate Assessing Service 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

6500 W Henderson Rd 

City or Town: 

State: 

| ZIP Code: 

| 

Elsie 

Ml 

48831 

Telephone Number: 989-666-21 59 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

rzemlajr@gmail.com 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Attacha 

separate sheet if necessary. 

1%] Yes 

[| No 

O 

Not Applicable 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more for all tax years at issue? 

ves 

[J 

No

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

Petitioner feels that parcel is overvalued due to the fact that much of the work was 

performed by friends and himself. There is a distinct difference between construction 

value and market value. The parcel in question in in line with like properties in the area. 

Corrections were made at board of review per owner information and a site visit. No 

interior inspection has been performed and is requested at this time to collect accurate 

information necessary for accurate evaluation. (Only an exterior inspection has been 

performed to date.) There were several improvements not on the record card to date as 

yet another inspection was to take place for the current year. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

Yes 

[| No 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

March 

O July 

[] December 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [i] Yes 

[Hl] No 

If yes, cite the Board's authority. 

Was the assessment at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? 

Yes 

0 No 

If yes, explain 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

[J ves 

MNo 

If so, what is the issue date? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE 

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? 

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? 

Section 6: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

P: 

| Number: 

erect 

Umber 010-026-200-015-00 

Classification of Property: 

Real] 

Personal [J (check one) 

Agricultural 

0 

~~ Commercial 

0 

Industrial 

J 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover [J 

~~ Developmental [1 

Utility 

J (check one)

Page 3

Michigan Department of Treasury 

618 (Rev. 12-25) 

Petition to Board of Review 

L-4035 

This form is issued under the authority of P.A. 206 of 1893, as amended. Filing is voluntary, however, you may not appeaf to the Michigan Tax Tribunal unless you first protest to the 

Board of Review, except when the property is classified as commercial real, Industrial real, or developmental real. You may not appeal property classifications to the State Tax 

Commission unless you first protest to the Bard of Review. 

*" RE COMPLETED BY OWNER OR OWNER'S AGENT 

.ner's Name {Please Print or Type) 

Petitioner's Name (If Other than Owner. Please Print or Type) 

HUHN DAVID 

Township or City 

County 

Year of Appeal 

SUNFIELD TOWNSHIP 

EATON 

The undersigned protests the assessed value andlor the tentative taxable value andor the property classification and/or the qualified agricultural property exemption of 

the following described property; 

Property Identified (Parcel code required. Property address and legal description optional) 

: 

010-026-200-015-00 

COM 1495 FT W OF NE COR SEC. 26, S 368.5 FT, W 178 FT, N 368.5 FT, £ 178 FT TO BEG. SEC. 26, 

7313 W MT HOPE HWY 

T4N,R6W, SUNFIELD 

TWP 1997 

Protested item 

[7] Assessed Value 

[7] 

Tentative 

[J] Taxable Status 

[0 

Classification 

{J 

Qualifed Agricultural 

Taxable Value 

(exemption) 

Property Exemption 

Complete this section for a protest of assessed value, 

property forms, 

Assessed Value 

Owner's Estimate of True Cash Value(Market Value) 

191,700 

[25 boo 

including asses: 

d value changes associated with exempt status and denied or late filed personal 

Complete this section for a priest of Taxable Value 

son: 

[7 

Value of Losses 

[OJ 

Value of Additions 

OJ Poverty Exemption 

~~ [] Uncapping % 

|3.-PROTEST 

OF 

CLASSIFICATION.” 

; 

Tn 

EE 

Complete this section 

for a request to change the classification. The Board of Review must make {heir decision regarding classification in ‘accordance 

h Sec 

n 

of 

e 

Michigan

Page 4

L-403

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax 

disputes.

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Individual 

First Name

David

M.I.

Chester

Last Name/Company Name

Huhn

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

7313 w mt hope

City or Town

mulliken

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48861

Telephone Number

517-202-9404

Fax Number

E-mail Address

dpconcrete2@yahoo.com

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address 

Section 3: Subject Property Information

How many parcels are you appealing?

1

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? No

 *If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

7313 w mt hope

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

mulliken

Michigan

48861

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of Sunfield (EATON)

County 

Eaton

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Value

 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal

Assessment and taxable values are higher than recent appraisal value and comps from all sold homes in the area. Both appraisal and comps were provided at the 

board of review. Current assessment has my home at $183,750. Doubled would be a value of $367,500 and puts my finished square foot price, if I was to sell at 

$287 a square foot. That is absolutely not even possible in Sunfield Township! Appraisal was in the fall of 2025 for $243,000, so that assessed value would be 

$121,500. Current Comparables sold in the area reflect $225,000 to $300,000 value. I have $170,000 into the purchase of the land and construction of the home. It is 

1280 finished square foot with a 1920 square foot garage all on a slab. Two bedroom home on an acre and half. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues

Year(s) you are appealing:

2026

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND upload the BOR decision: March

If No, check the applicable reason(s):

Did you request a Poverty Exemption at the BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR considered your application AND upload the BOR decision: 

 March  July  December

If No, explain why:

Section 7: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number: 010-026-200-015-00

Classification of Property:

Personal

Residential

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

183750

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

167027

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

243000 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

121500

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep’t of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal*

Parcel Identification Number:

 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:

What do you believe is the property’s classification?

If improved property, how is the property currently being used?

If improved property, for what use was the property designed?

Fee Information

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition?

Yes

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption?

No

If you answered yes to either or both of these questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees.

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is:

$100,000.00 and under $125.00

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00

$Over $500,000.00 $300.00

If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is:

$100,000.00 and under $250.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as

Page 4

ST

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

David Chester Huhn,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000382

Township Of Sunfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: April 22, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

David Chester Huhn,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000382

Township Of Sunfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: April 22, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

Comparable Market Analysis 

7313 W Mt Hope Hwy, Mulliken, MI, 48861 

Prepared for David Huhn—Saturday, March 7, 2026 

Kevin R Wheeler 

4th Right Realty 

906 Lakeview Dr 

Lake Odessa, MI 48849-0000 

616-706-9499 

kevindthright@icloud.com 

http:/imvww.4threalty.com 

License #: 6502345758 

This report is not an appraisal and is not intended to meet the requirements set out in the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice. If an appraisal is desired, the services of a 

licensed appraiser should be obtained. 

https:ffric.flexmls.com/cgi-binfmainmenu.cgi 

ze; fp-az am 

age 1 0

Page 2

CMA Prepared for David Huhn by Kevin R Wheeler 

7313 

W Mt Hope Hwy 

, Mulliken MI 48861 

Map of Subject And Comparable Properties 

| 

) 

. 

is 

Portland State 

Game Area oud 

NE Ne o 

2 

” 

© eg 

hd 

- ~(50)— ——Lake Odessa® 

ed 

Sunfield 

eee 

43) Woodland 

Vermontville 

\ 

| 

—~ 

Google 

| 

Map data ©2026 

@ Active 

 @ Sold 

© Pending 

@ Withdrawn 

@ Cancelled 

@ Expired 

Address 

MLS # 

Status 

Distance from Subject 

4 Ski 

[rats W Mt Hope Hwy 

, Mulliken MI 48861 

1 

17220 W Mt Hope Highway 

, Mulliken MI 48861 

289969 

Sold 

0.10m 

2 

15062 Grace Highway 

, Sunfield MI 48890 

288594 

Sold 

2.95m 

3 

17730 W St Joseph Highway 

, Mulliken MI 48861 

291663 

Sold 

0.97m 

4 

18691 N Ionia Road 

, Vermontville MI 49096 

26007662 

Sold 

2.99m 

5 

[10788 N Clinton Trail 

, Sunfield MI 48890 

289853 

Sold 

1.28m 

6 

[161 Charlotte Street 

, Mulliken MI 48861 

290701 

Sold 

5.55m 

7 

111526 Jordan Lake Road 

, Lake Odessa MI 48849 

25044710 

Sold 

10.81m 

https: /fric.flexmls.comjcgi-bin/mainmenu.cgi 

4/1/26, 10:42 AM 

Page 2 of 18

Page 3

CMA Prepared for David Huhn by Kevin R Wheeler 

7313 W Mt Hope Hwy 

, Mulliken MI 48861 

Subject 

“ 

Address 

7313 W Mt Hope Hwy 

, Mulliken, MI 48861 

Total Bedrooms 

2 

Total Baths 

3 

SqFt Above Grade 

1200 

Garage Y/N 

x 

Lot Acres 

1.5 

Basement 

no 

https://ric.flexmis.com/cgi-bin/mainmenu.cgi 

4/1/26, 10:42 AM 

Page 3 of 18

Page 4

CMA Prepared for David Huhn by Kevin R Wheeler 

Comparable Properties 

Subject 

289969 

7313 W Mt Hope Hwy 

, Muiliken MI 48861 

288594 

sep 

291663 

7730 

W St Joseph 

7313 W Mt Hope Hwy 

~~ 7220 W Mt Hope Highway 

5962 Grace Highway 

Highway 

Mulliken MI 48861 

Mulliken MI 

Sunfield MI 

Mulliken MI 

Distance From Subject 

0.10 

2.95 

0.97 

List Price 

$249,900 

$279,000 

$275,000 

Original List Price 

$249,900 

$279,000 

$275,000 

Sold Price 

$261,234 

$288,000 

$258,000 

Status 

Sold 

Sold 

Sold 

Status Date 

08/20/2025 

07/22/2025 

10/30/2025 

Days on Market 

8 

7 

5 

Cumulative Days on 

8 

7 

5 

Market 

Adjustment 

+- 

+- 

+- 

Total Bedrooms 

2 

3 

-7500 

5 

-22500 

3 

-7500 

Total Baths 

3 

1 

2 

2 

SqFt Above Grade 

1,200 

960 

1,584 

2,108 

Garage Y/N 

¥ 

Yes 

Lot Acres 

1.5 

2 

-2500 

1.49 

+50 

2.34 

-4200 

Basement 

no 

Adjusted Price 

$276,431 

$251,234 

$265,550 

$246,300 

4/1/26, 10:42 AM 

https://ric.flexmis.com/cgi-binfmainmenu.cgi 

Page 4 of 18

Page 5

Subject 

7313 W Mt Hope Hwy 

26007662 

8691 N lonia Road 

10788 N Clinton Trail 

289853 

290701 

161 Charlotte Street 

Mulliken MI 48861 

Vermontville Mi 

Sunfield MI 

Mulliken MI 

Distance From Subject 

2.99 

1.28 

5.55 

List Price 

$183,000 

$374,900 

$285,000 

Original List Price 

$183,000 

$374,900 

$285,000 

Sold Price 

$183,000 

$365,000 

$280,000 

Status 

Sold 

Sold 

Sold 

Status Date 

03/02/2026 

09/28/2025 

10/31/2025 

Days on Market 

0 

28 

40 

Cumulative Days on 

0 

28 

40 

Market 

Adjustment 

+ 

+= 

+- 

Total Bedrooms 

2 

3 

-7500 

3 

-7500 

3 

Total Baths 

3 

2 

2 

2 

SqFt Above Grade 

1,200 

1,578 

1,440 

1,320 

Garage Y/N 

Y 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Lot Acres 

1:5) 

0.9 

+3000 

13 

+1000 

0.19 

Basement 

no 

Yes 

Adjusted Price 

$276,431 

$178,500 

$358,500 

$280,000 

https:fjric.flexmlis.com/cgi-binfmainmenu.cgi 

4/1/26, 10:42 AM 

Page 5 of 18

Page 6

Subject 

7313 W Mt Hope Hwy 

25044710 

11526 Jordan Lake Road 

Mulliken Mi 48861 

Lake Odessa MI 

Distance From Subject 

10.81 

List Price 

$299,000 

Original List Price 

$349,500 

Sold Price 

$297,000 

Status 

Sold 

Status Date 

11/15/2025 

Days on Market 

36 

Cumulative Days on 

36 

Market 

Adjustment 

+- 

+= 

+- 

Total Bedrooms 

2 

3 

Total Baths 

3 

2 

SqFt Above Grade 

1,200 

1,120 

Garage Y/N 

X 

Yes 

Lot Acres 

1.5 

1.58 

Basement 

no 

Yes 

Adjusted Price 

$276,431 

$297,000 

htips://ric.flexmis.comjcgi-bin/mainmenu.cgi 

4/1/26, 10:42 AM 

Page 6 of 18

Page 7

CMA Prepared for David Huhn by Kevin R Wheeler 

7313 W Mt Hope Hwy 

, Mulliken MI 48861 

Price Analysis 

List, Sold and Adjusted Prices 

400.000 

Closed Listings 

350,000 

300,000 

5 

Recommended 

Price: ! 

250,000 

200,000 

150,000 

100,000 

50,000 

0 

oP 

> 

& 

G&, & 

FN 

Ro 

of 

he, 

LES) 

oS 0 

#5 

CY 

gs 2 

% 2 W 

oF Hs © 

oo Xa 

EN 

EN Nd 

No SW 

os «° 

SW 

id 

W 

o® 

es 

WW 

RON 

re 

& 

Ww 

. we 

35 

2° 

AP 

AND 

NN List BEEN Sold MMM Adjusted 

Low, Average, Median, and High Sold Prices 

400.000 

Closed Listings 

350,000 

300,000 

Fh 

ay 

~ 

Recommended Price: $276,431 

250,000 

200,000 

150.000 

100,000 

50,000 

0 

Average 

Median 

High 

BE Sold Price 

4{1/26, 10:42 AM 

https:j/ric.flexmis.com/cgi-bin/mainmenu.cgi 

psi 

ico 

z 

g 

Page 

7 of 18

Page 8

Summary of Sold Listings 

Total 

Adjusted 

MLS # 

Address 

List Price 

DOM 

CDOM 

Sold Date 

Sold Price 

Adjustments 

Price 

289969 

7220 W Mt Hope Highway, Mulliken MI 

$249,900 

8 

8 

08/20/2025 

$261,234 

$-10,000 $251,234 

288594 

5962 Grace Highway, Sunfield MI 

$279,000 

7 

7 

07/16/2025 

$288,000 

$-22,450 $265,550 

291663 

7730 W

Page 9

CMA

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

CAC EVER 

03/12/2026 08:17 

AM 

2026 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION 

SUNFIELD TOWNSHIP 

ASSESSOR RICHARD ZEMLA IR 

PO BOX 68 

SUNFIELD, MI 48890 

PROPERTY TOENTIFICATION: (Parcel Code required. property address 

and legal description optional): 

010-026-200-015-00 

7313 WMT HOPE HW 

COM 1495 FT W OF NE COR SEC. 26, S 368.3 FT, W178 FT, N 

168.5 FT, E178 FT TO BEG. SEC. 26, TAN,R6W, SUNFIELD 

TWP 1997 

7313 WM 

MULLIKEN MI 48861 

the information you supplied and the data necessary 

Thank you for attending this years March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed 

to compute your assessment and taxable value. 

The Board has completed their review of parcel number 010-026-200-015-00 

They have made the following determination based on the information you supplied. 

Board of Review Comments 

PER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE PETITIONER AND A SITE INSPECTION - THE MBOR HAS REMOVED OLD POLE BUILDING VALUE, REDUCED 

SIZE OF CONCRETE COVERED PORCH, ADDED VALUE FOR IN FLOOR HEAT, CONCRETE APPROACH. MBOR HAS DETERMINED THAT CURRENT 

VALUE ACCURATELY REFLECTS MARKET VALUE 

2026 ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE 

“BOARD OF REVIEW" ASSESSED VALUE 

183,750 

(if the above amounts are the same, 10 revisions have occured) 

174,927 

2026 ORIGINAL TAXABLE VALUE 

167,027 

"BOARD OF REV! 

TAXABLE VALUE 

PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION/QUALIFIED AG 

100.0000 

Please feel free 0 contact the assessor at the address listed above or call if you have any questions. 

«Effective March 1,2013, the Tribunal is no Jonger able tO accept Small Claims letter appeals. Rather, you aré required tO file a petition” 

initiate a NeW Small Claims appeal. Petition forms are available on this website.” 

pwr 

ichigan goufex OCTET §254---,00 html

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

ValueTec Appraisal Services, Inc. 

9500071872 

Uniform Residential Appraisal Report 

File No. CCU15D25R1 

The purpose of this summary appraisal report is to provide the lender/client with an accurate, and adequately supported, opinion of the market value of the subject property. 

Property Address 7313 W Mount Hope Hwy 

City Mulliken 

State Ml 

Zip Code 48861-9626 

Borrower David Huhn 

Owner of Public Record David Huhn 

County Eaton 

Legal Description See Attached Addendum 

Assessor's Parcel 

# 010-026-200-015-00 

Tax Year 2024 

RE. Taxes $ 812 

Neighborhood Name Sunfield Twp 

Map Reference 26045C0175E 

Census Tract 0207.00 

Occupant 

owner 

[ 

JTenant 

[J vacant 

Special Assessments $ 0 

[Jpup 

HOAs 0 

[Jperyear 

[Jper month 

Property Rights Appraised 

Fee Simple 

OJ Leasehold 

[ Other (describe) 

Assignment Type 

OJ Purchase Transaction 

Refinance Transaction 

J Other (describe) 

Lender/Client Consumers Credit Union 

Address 7200 Elm Valley Drive, Kalamazoo, MI 49009 

Is the subject property currently offered for sale or has it been offered for sale in the twelve months prior to the effective date of this appraisal? 

[] Yes 

No 

Report data source(s) used, offering price(s), and date(s). 

Per Realcomp the subject is not nor has been listed within the preceeding 12 months of the 

date of the appraisal. 

1 

UJ did J did not analyze the contract for sale for the subject purchase transaction. Explain the results of the analysis of the contract for sale or why the analysis was not performed. 

I. 

2 Contract Price $ 

Date of Contract 

Is the property seller the owner of public record? 

[] Yes J No 

Data Source(s) 

1 

is there any financial assistance (loan charges, sale concessions, gift or downpayment assistance, etc.) to be paid by any party on behalf of the borrower? 

UJ Yes J No 

8 

If Yes, report the total dollar amount and describe the items to be paid. 

Note: Race and the racial composition of the neighborhood are not appraisal factors. 

Neighborhood Characteristics 

One-UnitHousing Trends 

One-Unit Housing 

Present Land Use % 

Location [lB] Urban 

J] Suburban 

Rural 

Property Values [I] Increasing 

Stable 

[I] Declining 

PRICE 

AGE 

One-Unit 

60 % 

Built-Up J Over 75% 

5-75% 

J Under 25% | Demand/Supply 

Shortage 

J In Balance [Jover Supply | 

$(000) 

(yrs) 

2-4 Unit 

% 

[5] 

Growth 

J Rapid 

table 

J Slow 

Marketing Time 

Under 3 mths 

[] 3-6 mths 

J Over 6 mths 

109 Low 

0 | Multi-Family 

% 

#3 Neighborhood Boundaries 

1-96 to the North, M-100 to the East, M-79 to the South and M-43 to the 

359 High 

165 | Commercial 

% 

f°] West. 

250 Pred. 

40 | other Vacant 

40 % 

5] Neighborhood Description 

The subject is located 

in Sunfield Township within Eaton County. The subject neighborhood contains single family 

units and vacant land consisting of wooded and unimproved lots. Commercial property is mainly located along major arteries and does 

not negatively affect the subject. 

Market Conditions (including support for the above conclusions) 

Statistical evidence shows that the subject's market has stabilized with current active 

listing inventory are in balance with demand. The amount of REO sales have stabilized within the subject's neighborhood. 

Dimensions 178 x378 

Area 1.51 ac 

Shape Polygonal 

View A;Res;BsyRd 

Specific Zoning Classification LA 

Zoning Description Limited Agriculture Permits Single Family Residential 

Zoning Compliance 

Legal 

[lB] Legal Nonconforming (Grandfathered Use) 

[I] No Zoning 

[I] Illegal (describe) 

Is the highest and best use of the subject property as improved (or as proposed per plans and specifications) the present use? 

Yes UJ No 

If No, describe. 

See Attached 

Addendum 

Utilities 

Public 

Other (describe) 

Public 

Other (describe) 

Off-site Improvements—Type 

Public 

Private 

Electricity 

J 

Water 

Well Typical 

Street Paved 

J 

4] Gas 

[] 

Propane 

Sanitary Sewer 

[] 

Septic/Typical 

Alley 

None 

[] 

[] 

FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area 

[ves 

No 

FEMA Flood Zone X 

FEMA Map # 

26045C0175E 

FEMA Map Date 11/26/2010 

If No, describe. 

XJ ves [Ino 

Are the utilities and off-site improvements typical for the market area? 

Are there any adverse site conditions or extemal factors (easements, encroachments, environmental conditions, land uses, etc)? 

Yes [1] No 

If Yes, describe. 

See Attached 

Addendum 

GENERAL DESCRIPTION 

FOUNDATION 

EXTERIOR DESCRIPTION 

 materials/condition | INTERIOR 

materials/condition 

Units 

One 

J One with Accessory Unit 

Concrete Slab 

[I] Crawl Space 

Foundation Walls 

Concrete/New 

Floors 

Concrete/New 

#of Stories 

1 

[B] Full Basement 

[IB] Partial Basement | Exterior Walls 

Metal/Good 

Walls 

Drywall/New 

Type 

(XJpet. 

[Jat 

[Js-Det/End unit] Basement Area 

0 sq. ft. | Roof Surface 

Metal/Good 

Trim/Finish _ Drywall/New 

([Jexisting 

(Proposed 

Under Const. | Basement Finish 

0 % | Gutters & Downspouts None 

Bath Floor 

Concrete/New 

Design (Style) Barndominium 

(Joutside Entry/Exit 

OJ Sump Pump | Window Type 

VDH/Good 

Bath Wainscot_Fiberglass/New 

Year Built 2025 

Evidence of J Infestation 

Storm Sash/Insulated Insulation/Good 

Car Storage 

J None 

Effective Age (Yrs) 0 

[] Dampness 

[] Settlement 

Screens 

Mesh/Good 

Driveway 

#of Cars 

4 

Attic 

None 

Heating 

FWA 10] HWBB 

I J Radiant | Amenities 

J WoodStove(s) #0 

iveway Surface Gravel 

UJ Drop Stair 

[J stairs 

[Jother 

| Fuel Propane 

J Fireplace(s) # 0 

[lB] Fence None 

Garage 

#of Cars 

3 

J Floor 

[J scuttle 

Cooling

Page 2

Valu

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

ValueTec Appraisal Services, Inc. 

9500071872 

Uniform Residential Appraisal Report 

File No. CCU15D25R1 

The purpose of this summary appraisal report is to provide the lender/client with an accurate, and adequately supported, opinion of the market value of the subject property. 

Property Address 7313 W Mount Hope Hwy 

City Mulliken 

State Ml 

Zip Code 48861-9626 

Borrower David Huhn 

Owner of Public Record David Huhn 

County Eaton 

Legal Description See Attached Addendum 

Assessor's Parcel 

# 010-026-200-015-00 

Tax Year 2024 

RE. Taxes $ 812 

Neighborhood Name Sunfield Twp 

Map Reference 26045C0175E 

Census Tract 0207.00 

Occupant 

owner 

[ 

JTenant 

[J vacant 

Special Assessments $ 0 

[Jpup 

HOAs 0 

[Jperyear 

[Jper month 

Property Rights Appraised 

Fee Simple 

OJ Leasehold 

[ Other (describe) 

Assignment Type 

OJ Purchase Transaction 

Refinance Transaction 

J Other (describe) 

Lender/Client Consumers Credit Union 

Address 7200 Elm Valley Drive, Kalamazoo, MI 49009 

Is the subject property currently offered for sale or has it been offered for sale in the twelve months prior to the effective date of this appraisal? 

[] Yes 

No 

Report data source(s) used, offering price(s), and date(s). 

Per Realcomp the subject is not nor has been listed within the preceeding 12 months of the 

date of the appraisal. 

1 

UJ did J did not analyze the contract for sale for the subject purchase transaction. Explain the results of the analysis of the contract for sale or why the analysis was not performed. 

I. 

2 Contract Price $ 

Date of Contract 

Is the property seller the owner of public record? 

[] Yes J No 

Data Source(s) 

1 

is there any financial assistance (loan charges, sale concessions, gift or downpayment assistance, etc.) to be paid by any party on behalf of the borrower? 

UJ Yes J No 

8 

If Yes, report the total dollar amount and describe the items to be paid. 

Note: Race and the racial composition of the neighborhood are not appraisal factors. 

Neighborhood Characteristics 

One-UnitHousing Trends 

One-Unit Housing 

Present Land Use % 

Location [lB] Urban 

J] Suburban 

Rural 

Property Values [I] Increasing 

Stable 

[I] Declining 

PRICE 

AGE 

One-Unit 

60 % 

Built-Up J Over 75% 

5-75% 

J Under 25% | Demand/Supply 

Shortage 

J In Balance [Jover Supply | 

$(000) 

(yrs) 

2-4 Unit 

% 

[5] 

Growth 

J Rapid 

table 

J Slow 

Marketing Time 

Under 3 mths 

[] 3-6 mths 

J Over 6 mths 

109 Low 

0 | Multi-Family 

% 

#3 Neighborhood Boundaries 

1-96 to the North, M-100 to the East, M-79 to the South and M-43 to the 

359 High 

165 | Commercial 

% 

f°] West. 

250 Pred. 

40 | other Vacant 

40 % 

5] Neighborhood Description 

The subject is located 

in Sunfield Township within Eaton County. The subject neighborhood contains single family 

units and vacant land consisting of wooded and unimproved lots. Commercial property is mainly located along major arteries and does 

not negatively affect the subject. 

Market Conditions (including support for the above conclusions) 

Statistical evidence shows that the subject's market has stabilized with current active 

listing inventory are in balance with demand. The amount of REO sales have stabilized within the subject's neighborhood. 

Dimensions 178 x378 

Area 1.51 ac 

Shape Polygonal 

View A;Res;BsyRd 

Specific Zoning Classification LA 

Zoning Description Limited Agriculture Permits Single Family Residential 

Zoning Compliance 

Legal 

[lB] Legal Nonconforming (Grandfathered Use) 

[I] No Zoning 

[I] Illegal (describe) 

Is the highest and best use of the subject property as improved (or as proposed per plans and specifications) the present use? 

Yes UJ No 

If No, describe. 

See Attached 

Addendum 

Utilities 

Public 

Other (describe) 

Public 

Other (describe) 

Off-site Improvements—Type 

Public 

Private 

Electricity 

J 

Water 

Well Typical 

Street Paved 

J 

4] Gas 

[] 

Propane 

Sanitary Sewer 

[] 

Septic/Typical 

Alley 

None 

[] 

[] 

FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area 

[ves 

No 

FEMA Flood Zone X 

FEMA Map # 

26045C0175E 

FEMA Map Date 11/26/2010 

If No, describe. 

XJ ves [Ino 

Are the utilities and off-site improvements typical for the market area? 

Are there any adverse site conditions or extemal factors (easements, encroachments, environmental conditions, land uses, etc)? 

Yes [1] No 

If Yes, describe. 

See Attached 

Addendum 

GENERAL DESCRIPTION 

FOUNDATION 

EXTERIOR DESCRIPTION 

 materials/condition | INTERIOR 

materials/condition 

Units 

One 

J One with Accessory Unit 

Concrete Slab 

[I] Crawl Space 

Foundation Walls 

Concrete/New 

Floors 

Concrete/New 

#of Stories 

1 

[B] Full Basement 

[IB] Partial Basement | Exterior Walls 

Metal/Good 

Walls 

Drywall/New 

Type 

(XJpet. 

[Jat 

[Js-Det/End unit] Basement Area 

0 sq. ft. | Roof Surface 

Metal/Good 

Trim/Finish _ Drywall/New 

([Jexisting 

(Proposed 

Under Const. | Basement Finish 

0 % | Gutters & Downspouts None 

Bath Floor 

Concrete/New 

Design (Style) Barndominium 

(Joutside Entry/Exit 

OJ Sump Pump | Window Type 

VDH/Good 

Bath Wainscot_Fiberglass/New 

Year Built 2025 

Evidence of J Infestation 

Storm Sash/Insulated Insulation/Good 

Car Storage 

J None 

Effective Age (Yrs) 0 

[] Dampness 

[] Settlement 

Screens 

Mesh/Good 

Driveway 

#of Cars 

4 

Attic 

None 

Heating 

FWA 10] HWBB 

I J Radiant | Amenities 

J WoodStove(s) #0 

iveway Surface Gravel 

UJ Drop Stair 

[J stairs 

[Jother 

| Fuel Propane 

J Fireplace(s) # 0 

[lB] Fence None 

Garage 

#of Cars 

3 

J Floor 

[J scuttle 

Cooling

Page 2

Valu

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

CAC EVER 

03/12/2026 08:17 

AM 

2026 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION 

SUNFIELD TOWNSHIP 

ASSESSOR RICHARD ZEMLA IR 

PO BOX 68 

SUNFIELD, MI 48890 

PROPERTY TOENTIFICATION: (Parcel Code required. property address 

and legal description optional): 

010-026-200-015-00 

7313 WMT HOPE HW 

COM 1495 FT W OF NE COR SEC. 26, S 368.3 FT, W178 FT, N 

168.5 FT, E178 FT TO BEG. SEC. 26, TAN,R6W, SUNFIELD 

TWP 1997 

7313 WM 

MULLIKEN MI 48861 

the information you supplied and the data necessary 

Thank you for attending this years March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed 

to compute your assessment and taxable value. 

The Board has completed their review of parcel number 010-026-200-015-00 

They have made the following determination based on the information you supplied. 

Board of Review Comments 

PER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE PETITIONER AND A SITE INSPECTION - THE MBOR HAS REMOVED OLD POLE BUILDING VALUE, REDUCED 

SIZE OF CONCRETE COVERED PORCH, ADDED VALUE FOR IN FLOOR HEAT, CONCRETE APPROACH. MBOR HAS DETERMINED THAT CURRENT 

VALUE ACCURATELY REFLECTS MARKET VALUE 

2026 ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE 

“BOARD OF REVIEW" ASSESSED VALUE 

183,750 

(if the above amounts are the same, 10 revisions have occured) 

174,927 

2026 ORIGINAL TAXABLE VALUE 

167,027 

"BOARD OF REV! 

TAXABLE VALUE 

PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION/QUALIFIED AG 

100.0000 

Please feel free 0 contact the assessor at the address listed above or call if you have any questions. 

«Effective March 1,2013, the Tribunal is no Jonger able tO accept Small Claims letter appeals. Rather, you aré required tO file a petition” 

initiate a NeW Small Claims appeal. Petition forms are available on this website.” 

pwr 

ichigan goufex OCTET §254---,00 html

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax 

disputes.

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Individual 

First Name

David

M.I.

Chester

Last Name/Company Name

Huhn

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

7313 w mt hope

City or Town

mulliken

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48861

Telephone Number

517-202-9404

Fax Number

E-mail Address

dpconcrete2@yahoo.com

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address 

Section 3: Subject Property Information

How many parcels are you appealing?

1

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? No

 *If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

7313 w mt hope

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

mulliken

Michigan

48861

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of Sunfield (EATON)

County 

Eaton

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Value

 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal

Assessment and taxable values are higher than recent appraisal value and comps from all sold homes in the area. Both appraisal and comps were provided at the 

board of review. Current assessment has my home at $183,750. Doubled would be a value of $367,500 and puts my finished square foot price, if I was to sell at 

$287 a square foot. That is absolutely not even possible in Sunfield Township! Appraisal was in the fall of 2025 for $243,000, so that assessed value would be 

$121,500. Current Comparables sold in the area reflect $225,000 to $300,000 value. I have $170,000 into the purchase of the land and construction of the home. It is 

1280 finished square foot with a 1920 square foot garage all on a slab. Two bedroom home on an acre and half. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues

Year(s) you are appealing:

2026

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND upload the BOR decision: March

If No, check the applicable reason(s):

Did you request a Poverty Exemption at the BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR considered your application AND upload the BOR decision: 

 March  July  December

If No, explain why:

Section 7: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number: 010-026-200-015-00

Classification of Property:

Personal

Residential

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

183750

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

167027

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

243000 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

121500

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep’t of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal*

Parcel Identification Number:

 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:

What do you believe is the property’s classification?

If improved property, how is the property currently being used?

If improved property, for what use was the property designed?

Fee Information

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition?

Yes

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption?

No

If you answered yes to either or both of these questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees.

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is:

$100,000.00 and under $125.00

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00

$Over $500,000.00 $300.00

If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is:

$100,000.00 and under $250.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as

Page 4

ST

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.