Record Finder / 26-001008-TT
Michigan
Chad Michael Holt Petitioner V Township Of Brookfield Respondent
- Petitioner
- Chad Michael Holt
- Respondent
- Township Of Brookfield
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-001008-TT
- Status
- Ready Schedule
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Eaton
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Notice of Filing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/30/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 08/30/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Order of Partial Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/06/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 08/06/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/05/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/15/2026 | $0.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
SC-Notice_of_Filing_of_Answer.2026-09-30_14-52-22.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Chad Michael Holt, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-001008 Township Of Brookfield, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal settlement conference process.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-001008 Page 2 of 2 MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or email taxtrib@michigan.gov. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Chad Michael Holt, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-001008 Township Of Brookfield, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an appeal of a principal residence exemption
Page 4
M
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
26-001008-TT HOLT.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal The 2026 assessment for the subject property was completed in accordance with the General Property Tax Act and Stat Tax Commission (STC) guidelines. Michigan law requires assessors to use mass appraisal when determining true cash value. For 2026, the valuation was based on the current land table, the residential cost manual, depreciation schedules, and the Economic Condition Factor (ECF) for the Narrow Lake neighborhood. These same valuation components were applied uniformly to all properties in the area. The 2026 assessed value reflects the updated sales study and ECF calculations for the 2024-2025 study period, not the property's 2023 foreclosure sale or private appraisal. STC guidance prohibits using a single sale or private appraisal to set assessed value, and distressed sales cannot be used to reduce the neighborhood's valuation model. Taxable value for 2026 was calculated correctly under MCL 211.27a, increasing only by the inflation multiplier after the 2024 uncapping. This is the statutory method for determining taxable value and applies equally to all properties. The land value, building value, ECF, assessed value, and taxable value for 2026 all fall within the expected and legally required ranges. There is no indication of an error or deviation from STC standards. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes O No If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March OJ July O December If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [mm] Yes O No If yes, cite the Board’s authority. Was the assessment at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [J Yes No If yes, explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? O Yes WINo If so, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? Section 6: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Number: 4 50-040-600-039-00 Classification of Property: Real Personal [J (check one) Agricultural [1 Commercial J Industrial J Residential Timber-Cutover J Developmental [1 Utility [1 (check one) Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: by the Board of Review: 282,288 228,391 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 564,576 What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed value by .5) 282 288 assessed value) 228 391 Signature “required ay Attorney/Authorized Representatiyé’s pignature: - < 4
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001008-TT Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Unit of Government Brookfield Township Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 955 Tyler Dr City or Town: State: ZIP Code: Eaton Rapids Mi 48827 Telephone Number: 517-213-6039 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): jennifer.harris38@yahoo.com Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information } First Name: M.L: Last Name: Jennifer A Harris Firm Name (if any): Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 955 Tyler Dr. City or Town: State: ZIP Code: Eaton Rapids Mi 48827 Telephone Number: 51 7-2 1 3-6039 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): jennifer.harris38@yahoo.com Section 3: Subject Property Information Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. Od Yes O No Not Applicable Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more for all tax years at issue? Yes [1 No
Page 3
Parcel Number: 23150-040-600-039-00 Jurisdiction: BROOKFIELD TOWNSHIP Grantor Grantee Sale Sale Price Date FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE HOLT CHAD & KAIN KATHY 395,000 02/22/2023 MIKULA LARRY FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE 303,600 08/08/2019 MCCALLISTER MICHAEL & MAU MIKULA LARRY 356,500 11/14/2017 PEKRUL MARK E II & STEPHA MCCALLISTER MICHAEL & MAU 239,000 01/10/2014 Property Address Class: RESIDENTIAL-IMPRO Zoning: 8767 NARROW LAKE RD P.R.E. 100% 01/01/2024 fi Owner's Name/Address Map #: HOLT CHAD & KAIN KATHY 8767 NARROW LAKE RD SPRINGPORT MI 49284 X [Improved Public Vacant Improvements Dirt Road Gravel Road LOT 39. ASSESSORS PLAT OF NARROW LAKE Paved Road SEC. 28, TIN,R4W, BROOKFIELD TOWNSHIP Storm Sewer Comments/Influences Sidewalk Water Sewer X |Electric Gas Curb Tax Description Street Lights Standard Utilities Underground Utils. Topography of Site X Level X Rolling Low High Landscaped Swamp Wooded Pond Waterfront Ravine Wetland Flood Plain Who When The Equalizer. Copyright (c) 1999 - 2009. Licensed To: Township of Brookfield [County of Eaton, Michigan What *** Information herein deemed reliable but not guaranteed*** School: OLIVET COMMUNITY SCHOOLS County: EATON Inst. Type CD SD WD WD 2027 Est TCV 558,431 TCV/TFA: 315.85 Terms of Sale Printed on Liber & Page 12-FROM LENDING INSTITUT 3040/0971 10-FORECLOSURE 03-ARM'S LENGTH 03-ARM'S LENGTH
Page 4
Resi
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
scanswer_valuation.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001008 Respondent’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government: Township Of Brookfield (EATON) First Name M.I. Last Name Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any: First Name Jennifer M.I. Last Name Harris Firm Name (if any) Walton/Brookfield Township Eaton County Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 955 Tyler Dr City or Town Eaton Rapids State Michigan ZIP Code 48827 Telephone Number 5172136039 E-mail Address jennifer.harris38@yahoo.com Subject Property Information: Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. *If necessary, attach a separate sheet. No Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more? Yes
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal: The 2026 assessment for the subject property was completed in accordance with the General Property Tax Act and State Tax Commission (STC) guidelines. Michigan law requires assessors to use mass appraisal when determining true cash value. For 2026, the valuation was based on the current land table, the residential cost manual, depreciation schedules, and the Economic Condition Factor (ECF) for the Narrow Lake neighborhood. These same valuation components were applied uniformly to all properties in the area. The 2026 assessed value reflects the updated sales study and ECF calculations for the 2024–2025 study period, not the property’s 2023 foreclosure sale or private appraisal. STC guidance prohibits using a single sale or private appraisal to set assessed value, and distressed sales cannot be used to reduce the neighborhood’s valuation model. Taxable value for 2026 was calculated correctly under MCL 211.27a, increasing only by the inflation multiplier after the 2024 uncapping. This is the statutory method for determining taxable value and applies equally to all properties. The land value, building value, ECF, assessed value, and taxable value for 2026 all fall within the expected and legally required ranges. There is no indication of an error or deviation from STC standards. Jurisdictional Issues: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES: Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended: March If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, please cite the Board’s authority? Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, please explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? No If yes, when was it issued?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE: When was the Notice of Uncapping issued? Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped? Valuation Information: Parcel Identification Number: 150-040-600-039-00 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 282288 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 228391 What do you believe is the fair market value? 564576 What do you believe is the taxable value? 228391 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent’s Signature: /s/ Jennifer Harris Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Partial_Dismissal_-_Valuation.2026-08-06_07-26-21.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Chad Michael Holt, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-001008 Township Of Brookfield, Respondent. ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner is appealing assessments for prior tax years and the Tribunal has no authority over those assessments under MCL 205.735a, as the petition was not timely filed.1 Further, the Tribunal also has no authority over those assessments, as the facts alleged do not establish that the assessments were the result of a clerical error (i.e., “an error of a transpositional, typographical, or mathematical nature”) or a mutual mistake of fact (i.e., “an erroneous belief, which is shared and relied on by both parties”).2 Rather, the facts alleged indicate a valuation dispute that does not involve the correction of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s assessment appeal is PARTIALLY DISMISSED. The appeal shall continue for the 2026 tax year(s) only. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: August 6, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 1 See Electronic Data Systems Corporation v Township of Flint, 253 Mich App 538 (2002). 2 See International Place Apartments – IV v Ypsilanti Township, 216 Mich App 104, 109 (1996), Ford Motor Company v City of Woodhaven, 475 Mich 425, 442 (2006).
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Chad Michael Holt, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-001008 Township Of Brookfield, Respondent. ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner is appealing assessments for prior tax years and the Tribunal has no authority over those assessments under MCL 205.735a, as the petition was not timely filed.3 Further, the Tribunal also has no authority over those assessments, as the facts alleged do not establish that the assessments were the result of a clerical error (i.e., “an error of a transpositional, typographical, or mathematical nature”) or a mutual mistake of fact (i.e., “an erroneous belief, which is shared and relied on by both parties”).4 Rather, the facts alleged indicate a valuation dispute that does not involve the correction of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s assessment appeal is PARTIALLY DISMISSED. The appeal shall continue for the 2026 tax year(s) only. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: August 6, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 3 See Electronic Data Systems Corporation v Township of Flint, 253 Mich App 538 (2002). 4 See International Place Apartments – IV v Ypsilanti Township, 216 Mich App 104, 109 (1996), Ford Motor Company v City of Woodhaven, 475 Mich 425, 442 (2006).
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Chad Michael Holt, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-001008 Township Of Brookfield, Respondent. ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner is appealing assessments for prior tax years and the Tribunal has no authority over those assessments under MCL 205.735a, as the petition was not timely filed.5 Further, the Tribunal also has no authority over those assessments, as the facts alleged do not establish that the assessments were the result of a clerical error (i.e., “an error of a transpositional, typographical, or mathematical nature”) or a mutual mistake of fact (i.e., “an erroneous belief, which is shared and relied on by both parties”).6 Rather, the facts alleged indicate a valuation dispute that does not involve the correction of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s assessment appeal is PARTIALLY DISMISSED. The appeal shall continue for the 2026 tax year(s) only. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: August 6, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 5 See Electronic Data Systems Corporation v Township of Flint, 253 Mich App 538 (2002). 6 See International Place Apartments – IV v Ypsilanti Township, 216 Mich App 104, 109 (1996), Ford Motor Company v City of Woodhaven, 475 Mich 425, 442 (2006).
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
noreply_20260515_143635.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
March 9, 2026 To: Brookfield Township Board of Review From: Chad Holt and Kathy Kain, 8767 Narrow Lake Road Re: Request for review To whom it may concern: We are writing to formally request a review of the assessment and taxation of our property purchased in February 2023. Attached, you wili find documentation of: e A comparison of a similarly priced house (sold the same year) on the opposite side of the lake. The report includes square footage, sale price, assessed value, and taxable value comparisons since 2023 for 8767 Narrow Lake Road and 8616 Lake Drive - Email correspondence with the previous and current property assessor The original property appraisal at the time of sale for 8767 Narrow Lake Road It is our contention that our home was initially appraised and taxed unfairly, and the effects have made the current assessment and taxation incorrect or unfair in comparison. Any explanation that purchasing our home through foreclosure at a value much lower than the market value is not supported by either the homes in the area or the appraisal done at the time of sale. The sale price of the home declined dramatically due to the market value at the time and it remained on the market until its worth matched the sales price. The initial appraisal appears to be based on the highest and first amount the home was listed at. It did not receive an offer until the price went below $400,000. Opinions that it was worth more than the purchase price seem to be just that. We request that the initial assessment reflect the actual market and property values, as determined by the hired property appraiser. We also request that the following three years be computed using the correct information to accurately reflect the taxes owed. Thank you for your time and consideration in reviewing our case. incerely, Ah athy A. gain Kao
Page 2
LL/S gb ma algexeL 0078E'SHS wa a1gexe 00°LE0'BES ma lqexel 00°852'5€$ 1a eiqexel 00°550'PES 10 21qexeL 00°000'€0Z$ v0/6/LL 00°009'€0€$ 61L/8/8 @dud sles 9jeq ajes Adld Hd A3s 00'¥8€'5L$ Ha A3s 00°L£0'6€$ Ha A3s 00°088'€L$ Hd A3S 00'5€6'9v$ Hana3s 1.5% EVE 8vee abejoo asenbg 00269 212s wr? Ibs BYE RaLCal Xel leuid 97 A3S leuld 92 00°€00'202$ 00°€00'£02$ 008£'7228 00°288'227$ Xel leuld Sz A3S leuld 52 00292'L12$ 00292'1LZ$ 00'€62°0528 00°€62°052$ Xel feuld v7 A3S leuld bz Q0'EPY'SELS 00'G8S'6GLS 00'L0Z'69L$ 00'SIY'EETS Xe [euld £2 A3S euld £2 00'680'L2L$ 00°689'051 8 00'bYL'L9LS 00'729'L6L$ Xepjewdzz A3S leuld 27 00'000'58%$ €2ILIL 00'000'G6ES Prredcd 20ud ?leg Plog ise anuQ oe 9198 PEOY OXE] MOLEN [9/8 BALA 9%eT 91.98 POY 22 MoLEN £9/8 ang ave 9198 POY 24e MoueN £9/8 anuQ ae 9198 peoy oe MoueN 29/8 anuQ aye 9198 POY ove MOURN £9.8 ong axe 91.98 Peoy ove MOLeN £9/8 £202 Ul ploS SaWOH Ye mouieN Jo uosuedwo)
Page 4
3/10/26, 9:47 AM
8616 Lake Dr, Springport, MI 49284
| Zillow
<{
Backto search
Zz Zi | low
$485,000
8616 Lake Dr, Springport, Ml 49284
Est. refi payment: $3,023/mo © Refinance your loan
dll Single Family Residence
f° Built in 2021
22 $534,800 Zestimate®
is, $141/sqft
Home value
Zestimate®
$534,800
https:/fwww.zillow.com/homedetails/8616-Lake-Dr-Springport-Mi-49284/74716829_zpid/
Q save
iN Share
eco More
|
BE see all 60 photos
|
4
3
3,433
beds
baths
sqft
A. 0.52 Acres Lot
©) $3,463 Estimated rent
117Page 5
3/10/26, 8:28 AM Yahoo Mail - Re: Questions Re: Questions Cu re nt From: Jennifer Harris (jennifer.harris38@yahoo.com) To: mtneerone@yahoo.com Date: Monday, March 9, 2026 at 07:43 PM EDT Hi Chad, The appraisal completed when the bank sold the home reflects the value of a distressed transaction, not open-market conditions. Michigan law requires assessed value to be based on arm’s-length market sales, so foreclosure-related appraisals cannot be used to determine true cash value. The 2026 assessed value at 8616 Lake Dr is 222,373 and the taxable is 212,592. Thank you, Jennifer From: Chad Holt <mtneerone@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, March 9, 2026 10:36 AM To: Jennifer Harris <jennifer.harris38@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Questions Jennifer, Would the property appraisal done at the time of sale also be representative of the actual value? Thank you for clarifying the difference regarding the school millage and sewer assessment between the two homes. | don't think those are things that we can see online. If we were to narrow it down strictly to property taxes, what are the new assessed and taxable values for 8616 Lake Drive? Their square footage is 3433 and ours is only 2248. | want to thank you for your time in helping us work through this. You have been wonderfully responsive and informative. It is much appreciated. Thanks Chad On Sunday, March 8, 2026 at 07:36:07 PM EDT, Jennifer Harris <jennifer.hartis38@yahoo.com> wrote: about:blank 1/3
Page 6
3/10/28, 8:28 AM Yahoo Mail - Re: Questions Hi Chad, When you purchased your home in 2023, the taxable was capped. The year following a sale, there is uncapping, which brings the home to current market value and the assessed becomes the taxable for that year. In 2025, the market value decreased which is why your assessed shows lower. The taxable value cannot be higher than the assessed, so that is why the taxable value is the same as your assessed for that year. In 2026, there was an increase in market value, so your assessment went up. Your taxable went up the rate of inflation, which is 2.7% for 2026. Assessment values will fluctuate depending on market value for the year, while taxable values can only increase the rate of inflation or 5%, whichever is lower. I hope this gives you a better explanation. Thank you, Jennifer, Brookfield Township Assessor On Sunday, March 8, 2026 at 10:32:30 AM EDT, Chad Holt <mtneerone@yahoo.com> wrote: Good Morning, Jennifer. Have you had a chance to review our questions about the history of assessed and taxable value fluctuation. Thanks
Page 7
3
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
scpetition_valuation.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 1 of 3 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. Petitioner’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Individual Local Unit of Government: First Name Chad M.I. Michael Last Name Holt Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 8767 Narrow Lake Road City or Town Springport State Michigan ZIP Code 49284 Telephone Number 3046100065 E-mail Address mtneerone@yahoo.com Subject Property Information: How many parcels are you appealing? 1 If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? *If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel N/A Property Address (No., Street) 8767 Narrow Lake Road City or Town Springport County Eaton State Michigan ZIP Code 49284 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Brookfield (EATON) Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Uncapping of Taxable Value Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 2 of 3 We feel that our original uncapping was inconsistent with homes of similar value in our township, and that the current assessment far exceeds our home's market value. The information provided shows dramatic increases and decreases in our assessment, which do not reflect the real estate market in the area. This information is being provided to you in table form. There are only a few similar homes on our lake currently on the market that provide a fair comparison. After learning that our appeal was denied, we have placed our home on the market for the township's determination. There have been zero inquiries or showings since listing our home for sale, which seems inconsistent with home sales in our area. We are providing all the information that was provided to the township, along with their decision, for your review. We also feel that the township should be responsible for all fees to get a second opinion. Jurisdictional Issues: Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: March If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Year(s) Under Appeal: 2023-2026 Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal: Parcel Number: 23150-040-600-039-00 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 282288 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 228391 What do you believe is the fair market value? 450000 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 225000 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 3 of 3 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner’s Signature: /s/ Chad M. Holt Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/ Fee Information: If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for the filing of this appeal. The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. Property tax appeal: Residential** Non-Residential SEV or TV in contention* Filing fee*** Filing Fee** $100,000 or less...........................................................................................$ 125.00 $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00.........................................................................$ 200.00 N/A More than $500,000…..................................................................................$ 300.00 N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? Yes
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
SC_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-08-05_07-08-58.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Chad Michael Holt, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-001008 Township Of Brookfield, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: August 5, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Chad Michael Holt, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-001008 Township Of Brookfield, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: August 5, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Chad Michael Holt, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-001008 Township Of Brookfield, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: August 5, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
noreply_20260515_143635.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
March 9, 2026 To: Brookfield Township Board of Review From: Chad Holt and Kathy Kain, 8767 Narrow Lake Road Re: Request for review To whom it may concern: We are writing to formally request a review of the assessment and taxation of our property purchased in February 2023. Attached, you wili find documentation of: e A comparison of a similarly priced house (sold the same year) on the opposite side of the lake. The report includes square footage, sale price, assessed value, and taxable value comparisons since 2023 for 8767 Narrow Lake Road and 8616 Lake Drive - Email correspondence with the previous and current property assessor The original property appraisal at the time of sale for 8767 Narrow Lake Road It is our contention that our home was initially appraised and taxed unfairly, and the effects have made the current assessment and taxation incorrect or unfair in comparison. Any explanation that purchasing our home through foreclosure at a value much lower than the market value is not supported by either the homes in the area or the appraisal done at the time of sale. The sale price of the home declined dramatically due to the market value at the time and it remained on the market until its worth matched the sales price. The initial appraisal appears to be based on the highest and first amount the home was listed at. It did not receive an offer until the price went below $400,000. Opinions that it was worth more than the purchase price seem to be just that. We request that the initial assessment reflect the actual market and property values, as determined by the hired property appraiser. We also request that the following three years be computed using the correct information to accurately reflect the taxes owed. Thank you for your time and consideration in reviewing our case. incerely, Ah athy A. gain Kao
Page 2
LL/S gb ma algexeL 0078E'SHS wa a1gexe 00°LE0'BES ma lqexel 00°852'5€$ 1a eiqexel 00°550'PES 10 21qexeL 00°000'€0Z$ v0/6/LL 00°009'€0€$ 61L/8/8 @dud sles 9jeq ajes Adld Hd A3s 00'¥8€'5L$ Ha A3s 00°L£0'6€$ Ha A3s 00°088'€L$ Hd A3S 00'5€6'9v$ Hana3s 1.5% EVE 8vee abejoo asenbg 00269 212s wr? Ibs BYE RaLCal Xel leuid 97 A3S leuld 92 00°€00'202$ 00°€00'£02$ 008£'7228 00°288'227$ Xel leuld Sz A3S leuld 52 00292'L12$ 00292'1LZ$ 00'€62°0528 00°€62°052$ Xel feuld v7 A3S leuld bz Q0'EPY'SELS 00'G8S'6GLS 00'L0Z'69L$ 00'SIY'EETS Xe [euld £2 A3S euld £2 00'680'L2L$ 00°689'051 8 00'bYL'L9LS 00'729'L6L$ Xepjewdzz A3S leuld 27 00'000'58%$ €2ILIL 00'000'G6ES Prredcd 20ud ?leg Plog ise anuQ oe 9198 PEOY OXE] MOLEN [9/8 BALA 9%eT 91.98 POY 22 MoLEN £9/8 ang ave 9198 POY 24e MoueN £9/8 anuQ ae 9198 peoy oe MoueN 29/8 anuQ aye 9198 POY ove MOURN £9.8 ong axe 91.98 Peoy ove MOLeN £9/8 £202 Ul ploS SaWOH Ye mouieN Jo uosuedwo)
Page 4
3/10/26, 9:47 AM
8616 Lake Dr, Springport, MI 49284
| Zillow
<{
Backto search
Zz Zi | low
$485,000
8616 Lake Dr, Springport, Ml 49284
Est. refi payment: $3,023/mo © Refinance your loan
dll Single Family Residence
f° Built in 2021
22 $534,800 Zestimate®
is, $141/sqft
Home value
Zestimate®
$534,800
https:/fwww.zillow.com/homedetails/8616-Lake-Dr-Springport-Mi-49284/74716829_zpid/
Q save
iN Share
eco More
|
BE see all 60 photos
|
4
3
3,433
beds
baths
sqft
A. 0.52 Acres Lot
©) $3,463 Estimated rent
117Page 5
3/10/26, 8:28 AM Yahoo Mail - Re: Questions Re: Questions Cu re nt From: Jennifer Harris (jennifer.harris38@yahoo.com) To: mtneerone@yahoo.com Date: Monday, March 9, 2026 at 07:43 PM EDT Hi Chad, The appraisal completed when the bank sold the home reflects the value of a distressed transaction, not open-market conditions. Michigan law requires assessed value to be based on arm’s-length market sales, so foreclosure-related appraisals cannot be used to determine true cash value. The 2026 assessed value at 8616 Lake Dr is 222,373 and the taxable is 212,592. Thank you, Jennifer From: Chad Holt <mtneerone@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, March 9, 2026 10:36 AM To: Jennifer Harris <jennifer.harris38@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Questions Jennifer, Would the property appraisal done at the time of sale also be representative of the actual value? Thank you for clarifying the difference regarding the school millage and sewer assessment between the two homes. | don't think those are things that we can see online. If we were to narrow it down strictly to property taxes, what are the new assessed and taxable values for 8616 Lake Drive? Their square footage is 3433 and ours is only 2248. | want to thank you for your time in helping us work through this. You have been wonderfully responsive and informative. It is much appreciated. Thanks Chad On Sunday, March 8, 2026 at 07:36:07 PM EDT, Jennifer Harris <jennifer.hartis38@yahoo.com> wrote: about:blank 1/3
Page 6
3/10/28, 8:28 AM Yahoo Mail - Re: Questions Hi Chad, When you purchased your home in 2023, the taxable was capped. The year following a sale, there is uncapping, which brings the home to current market value and the assessed becomes the taxable for that year. In 2025, the market value decreased which is why your assessed shows lower. The taxable value cannot be higher than the assessed, so that is why the taxable value is the same as your assessed for that year. In 2026, there was an increase in market value, so your assessment went up. Your taxable went up the rate of inflation, which is 2.7% for 2026. Assessment values will fluctuate depending on market value for the year, while taxable values can only increase the rate of inflation or 5%, whichever is lower. I hope this gives you a better explanation. Thank you, Jennifer, Brookfield Township Assessor On Sunday, March 8, 2026 at 10:32:30 AM EDT, Chad Holt <mtneerone@yahoo.com> wrote: Good Morning, Jennifer. Have you had a chance to review our questions about the history of assessed and taxable value fluctuation. Thanks
Page 7
3
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
scpetition_valuation.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 1 of 3 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. Petitioner’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Individual Local Unit of Government: First Name Chad M.I. Michael Last Name Holt Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 8767 Narrow Lake Road City or Town Springport State Michigan ZIP Code 49284 Telephone Number 3046100065 E-mail Address mtneerone@yahoo.com Subject Property Information: How many parcels are you appealing? 1 If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? *If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel N/A Property Address (No., Street) 8767 Narrow Lake Road City or Town Springport County Eaton State Michigan ZIP Code 49284 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Brookfield (EATON) Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Uncapping of Taxable Value Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 2 of 3 We feel that our original uncapping was inconsistent with homes of similar value in our township, and that the current assessment far exceeds our home's market value. The information provided shows dramatic increases and decreases in our assessment, which do not reflect the real estate market in the area. This information is being provided to you in table form. There are only a few similar homes on our lake currently on the market that provide a fair comparison. After learning that our appeal was denied, we have placed our home on the market for the township's determination. There have been zero inquiries or showings since listing our home for sale, which seems inconsistent with home sales in our area. We are providing all the information that was provided to the township, along with their decision, for your review. We also feel that the township should be responsible for all fees to get a second opinion. Jurisdictional Issues: Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: March If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Year(s) Under Appeal: 2023-2026 Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal: Parcel Number: 23150-040-600-039-00 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 282288 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 228391 What do you believe is the fair market value? 450000 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 225000 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 3 of 3 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner’s Signature: /s/ Chad M. Holt Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/ Fee Information: If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for the filing of this appeal. The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. Property tax appeal: Residential** Non-Residential SEV or TV in contention* Filing fee*** Filing Fee** $100,000 or less...........................................................................................$ 125.00 $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00.........................................................................$ 200.00 N/A More than $500,000…..................................................................................$ 300.00 N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? Yes
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.