Chaker Y Ben Haj Mohamed, Petitioner V City Of Detroit, Respondent

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Chaker Y Ben Haj Mohamed, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003371 

 

City of Detroit, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioner was placed in 

default on September 5, 2024, because they failed to complete and sign the petition, 

failed to submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal, and failed to pay a petition 

filing fee. On October 1, 2024, the Tribunal extended the time for Petitioner to cure the 

default by an additional 14 days and they have failed to respond. Petitioner has not 

complied with either order, and the latter stated that “failure to comply with this Order 

shall result in the dismissal of the case . . .” and referenced Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury.1 

In Grimm, the Michigan Court of Appeals summarized factors that the Tribunal should 

consider before imposing the sanction of dismissal. Those factors are: 

 

(1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of 

refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the 

opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) 

the degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) 

attempts to cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better 

serve the interests of justice.2 

 

Here, Petitioner’s failure to comply with multiple orders has established a history of 

deliberate delay. As a result, giving careful consideration to the factors involved and 

considering all options in determining what sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal 

finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser sanction would not be appropriate in 

light of Petitioner’s history of noncompliance in this case. 

 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

 

This Order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 

 

 

1 Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

2 Id. at 149.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003371 

Page 2 of 2 

 

 

APPEAL RIGHTS 

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless 

the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a 

principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the 

decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, 

if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the 

opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to 

electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the 

motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral 

arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. 

 

Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the 

claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If 

the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal 

by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the 

record on appeal. There is no certification fee. 

 

 

Entered: October 25, 2024 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

ssm 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Chaker Y Ben Haj Mohamed,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003371

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003371

Page 2 of 8

If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or 

email taxtrib@michigan.gov.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: October 25, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Chaker Y Ben Haj Mohamed,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003371

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR

Page 4

MTT

Page 5

STAT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

 

CHAKER Y BEN HAJ MOHAMED 

Petitioner, 

v 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003371 

 

 

CITY OF DETROIT, 

 

 

 

 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

On 10/02/2024 I, Frances Burton, e-filed a copy of the Respondent’s Answer, Proof of Service, 

Valuation Report, Assessment Notice, Record Card and MBOR Results Letter for this 

appeal to: 

 

 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

Po Box 30232 

Lansing MI, 48909 

 

And emailed a copy to Petitioner: 

 

Chaker Y Ben Haj Mohamed 

[truckingsolution15@gmail.com] 

8414 Riverdale St 

Dearborn Heights, MI 48127 

 

 

 

I declare that the statement above is true to the best of my information, knowledge, and belief. 

 

 

Dated: 10-02-2024 

Signature_Frances Y Burton 

Frances Y Burton 

 

 

 

 

Appraiser II 

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 

2 Woodward Ave., Suite 804 

Detroit, Michigan 48226

Page 2

ARCHIVED

Valuation Report

DB:

Detroit-24

10/01/2024

02:38 PM

 Total Depreciated Cost = 136,566

Eff.Age:22 Phy.%Good/Abnr.Phy./Func./Econ./Overall %Good: 60 /100/100/100/60.0

 Reproduction/Replacement Cost = 227,610

 

Total Floor Area: 3,000 Base Cost New of Upper Floors = 227,610

 

Adjusted Square Foot Cost for Upper Floors = 75.87

(10) Heating system: Forced Air Furnace Cost/SqFt: 11.13 100%

 

Base Rate for Upper Floors = 64.74

 

Overall Building Height: 14

Stories: 1 Story Height: 14 Perimeter: 176

 Class: C Quality: Average

<<<<< Calculator Cost Computations >>>>>

Costs are taken from the Warehouses - Storage cost schedules.

 

Description of Occupancy: BLDG. 1, SEC. 2

Cost Estimates for Commercial/Industrial Building/Section: 2 Built 1950

 Replacement Cost/Floor Area= 94.78 Est. TCV/Floor Area= 19.16

ECF (IGIG2-INDUSTRIAL-GENERAL (6K SF +)) 0.337 => TCV of Bldg: 1 = 70,525

 

 Total Depreciated Cost = 0

Eff.Age:25 Phy.%Good/Abnr.Phy./Func./Econ./Overall %Good: 60 /100/100/100/60.0

 Reproduction/Replacement Cost = 0

 

Architectural Multiplier: 1.07

 Total Cost New = 0

 

Item Desciption Col. Rate SqFt Adj. Adj. Cost

 Cost # or Height Storys 

Costs taken from Segregated Cost Section 4: Garages, Industrials, Warehouses

<<<<< Segregated Cost Computations >>>>>

 

 Total Depreciated Cost = 209,274

Eff.Age:25 Phy.%Good/Abnr.Phy./Func./Econ./Overall %Good: 60 /100/100/100/60.0

 Reproduction/Replacement Cost = 348,790

 

Total Floor Area: 3,680 Base Cost New of Upper Floors = 348,790

 

Adjusted Square Foot Cost for Upper Floors = 94.78

(10) Heating system: Forced Air Furnace Cost/SqFt: 11.91 100%

 

Base Rate for Upper Floors = 82.87

 

Overall Building Height: 15

Stories: 1 Story Height: 15 Perimeter: 264

 Class: C Quality: Average

<<<<< Calculator Cost Computations >>>>>

Costs are taken from the Industrial - Light Manufacturing cost schedules.

 

Description of Occupancy: BLDG. 1, SEC. 1

Cost Estimates for Commercial/Industrial Building/Section: 1 Built 1949

 0.27 Total Acres Total Est. Land Value = 29,839

SQ FT RATE BY SIZE 11,935.440 Sq Ft 2.50 100 29,839

Description Frontage Depth Front Depth Rate %Adj. Reason Value

 * Factors *

Land Value Estimates for Land Table INDP.INDP-INDUSTRIAL PRIME GROUP 

22/682 12,061 SQ FT

E PIERSON E 60 FT OF 49 THRU 54 OAKMOOR LITTLE FARMS SUB L63 P82 PLATS, W C R

Map #: 22 CITY OF DETROIT , 48223 

Property Class: 301 20733 GLENDALE 

22106331. 2024 Est. T.C.V. MOHAMED, CHAKA BEN MAJ

Page 3

ARCHIVED

Valuation Report

DB:

Detroit-24

10/01/2024

02:38 PM

 73,200 62,500 62,500 73,290 62,500 0

2024 Assessed MBOR S.E.V. Capped ->Taxable<- PRE/MBT

 0 -7,300 0 0 -7,300 0

2024 New Eq. Adjustment Loss Additions Tax Adjustment Losses

 69,800 69,800 69,800 69,800 5.00

2023 Assessed MBOR S.E.V. Base for Cap C.P.I.

Est. TCV/Total Floor Area = 21.91, Most recent sale 05/15/2023 for 75,000

2024 Est. T.C.V. 22106331. = 146,387

Total Estimated True Cash Value of Commercial/Industrial Buildings = 116,548

 Replacement Cost/Floor Area= 75.87 Est. TCV/Floor Area= 15.34

ECF (IGIG2-INDUSTRIAL-GENERAL (6K SF +)) 0.337 => TCV of Bldg: 2 = 46,023

 

 Total Depreciated Cost = 0

Eff.Age:22 Phy.%Good/Abnr.Phy./Func./Econ./Overall %Good: 60 /100/100/100/60.0

 Reproduction/Replacement Cost = 0

 

Architectural Multiplier: 1.07

 Total Cost New = 0

 

Item Desciption Col. Rate SqFt Adj. Adj. Cost

 Cost # or Height Storys 

Costs taken from Segregated Cost Section 4: Garages, Industrials, Warehouses

<<<<< Segregated Cost Computations >>>>>

 

Parcel Number: 22106331. Page: 2

Page 4

ARCHIVED

Valuation Report

DB:

Detroit-24

10/01/2024

02:38 PM

*** Information herein deemed reliable but not guaranteed***

Parcel Number: 22106331., Commercial/Industrial Building 1

Page 5

ARCHIVED

1949

25

146,387.00 

MARKET VALUE

Questions regarding the Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification may be directed to

the following:

9. YEAR BUILT (ACTUAL AGE):

The 2024 Inflation Rate Multiplier is: 1.05

7. ESTIMATED TRUE CASH VALUE (MARKET VALUE):

6. ASSESSOR CHANGE REASON:

8. EFFECTIVE AGE:

X

Exempt As "Qualified Forest Property":

Exempt As "Development Property":

THIS IS NOT A TAX BILL

X No

Yes

Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification

Michigan Department of Treasury,

1019 (Rev, 11-23)

ACCORDING TO MCL 211.34c THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS:

5. There WAS/WAS NOT a transfer of ownership on this property in 

1. TAXABLE VALUE (Current amount is tentative):

% Exempt As "Qualified Agricultural Property":

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION

Legal Description:

3,400

62,500

The change in taxable value will increase/decrease

your tax bill for this year by approximately:

3,400

PROPERTY ADDRESS:

No

Yes

PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION

DEARBORN HEIGHTS MI 48127

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON

NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL

PARCEL NUMBER:

This form is issued under the authority of P.A. 206 of 1893, Sec. 211.24 (c) and Sec.211.34c, as amended. This is a

model assessment notice to be used by the local assessor.

L-4400

FROM:

CITY OF DETROIT

OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR

2 WOODWARD AVE., SUITE

Page 6

ARCHIVED

G

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-003371 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City of Detroit (Wayne)

First Name

Jean-Philippe

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government

Saulnier

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

2 Woodward Ave.

City or Town

Detroit

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48226

Telephone Number

313-939-0127

Fax Number

E-mail Address

assessorscbdcommercial@detroitmi.gov

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Frances

M.I.

Last Name

Burton

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

2 Woodwaard Avenue

City or Town

Detroit

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48202

Telephone Number

3139791656

Fax Number

E-mail Address

frabur@detroitmi.gov

Section 3: Subject Property Information

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another.

No 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this 

document, you may be held in default.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

The subject property is fairly assessed and is in uniformity with like properties in the City Of Detroit.

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

If yes, cite the Board’s authority.

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? 

If yes, explain.

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

If so, what is the issue date?

Michigan

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued?

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption:

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS

Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Tax Year(s) denied:

List the date the exemption was denied:

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number:

22106331

Classification of Property:

Real 

Commercial

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

62,500

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

62,500

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

125,000

Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

62,500

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Frances Burton

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Chaker Y Ben Haj Mohamed, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003371

 

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO CURE DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that an Order 

was entered holding a party in default and the defaulted party has failed to timely cure 

that default. However, no history of deliberate delay had been established prior to that 

party being held in default. As such, the defaulted party should be given another 

opportunity to cure the default, as provided by Grimm v Treasury.1 Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner shall cure the default as required by the Order holding 

that party in default and file a Motion to Set Aside Default, with the appropriate filing fee, 

and proof demonstrating service of the Motion on the opposing party, within 14 days of 

the entry of this Order. 2

Failure to cure the default, as required by this Order, will result in the dismissal of the 

case, if Petitioner was held in default, or the conducting of a default hearing, if 

Respondent was held in default.3 

By:_____________ ________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: October 1, 2024

1 Grimm v Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).

2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 219(5).

3 See TTR 231.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003371

Page 2 of 4

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Chaker Y Ben Haj Mohamed, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003371

 

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO CURE DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that an Order 

was entered holding a party in default and the defaulted party has failed to timely cure 

that default. However, no history of deliberate delay had been established prior to that 

party being held in default. As such, the defaulted party should be given another 

opportunity to cure the default, as provided by Grimm v Treasury.4 Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner shall cure the default as required by the Order holding 

that party in default and file a Motion to Set Aside Default, with the appropriate filing fee, 

and proof demonstrating service of the Motion on the opposing party, within 14 days of 

the entry of this Order. 5

Failure to cure the default, as required by this Order, will result in the dismissal of the 

case, if Petitioner was held in default, or the conducting of a default hearing, if 

Respondent was held in default.6 

By:_____________ ________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: October 1, 2024

4 Grimm v Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).

5 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 219(5).

6 See TTR 231.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 24-003371

Page 4 of 4

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Chaker Y Ben Haj Mohamed,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003371

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner failed to properly complete the petition and may have failed to pay the full 

required fee for the filing of the petition. See TTR 277 and 267. As such, the appeal is 

not properly pending. Petitioner must complete the petition by providing all information 

required by each applicable section, return the completed petition, and pay the 

additional fee amount required for the filing of the petition, if any, within 14 days of the 

entry of this Order. The petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal. 

Small Claims petition forms and a filing fee calculator can be found on our website at 

www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via e-filing. 

Furthermore,

Petitioner failed to sign the petition and pay the full required fee for the filing of the 

petition. See TTR 261, 215 and MCR 2.114 and TTR 267. As such, the appeal is not 

properly pending. Petitioner must sign and return the petition and pay the additional fee 

amount required for the filing of the petition within 14 days of the entry of this Order. The 

petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal. A filing fee calculator 

can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the payment 

may not be made via e-filing.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this Order.i 

Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003371

Page 2 of 3

Entered: September 5, 2024

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 24-003371

Page 3 of 3

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 219(5)

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

MAY 80204 

_ ola 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Siwall Claims Petition; if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First Name 

M.l. 

Last Name/Company Name 

cHaler 

y 

2 enn May Mow 

aru od 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

I 

TRARY 

R uot 

da lo 

=X 

City or Towh 

State 

ZIP Code 

oan 

sie Ha 

MT] 

(F127 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

5X RX3025777 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Ruck tng Saluda \S @) rail «Conn 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Bnei 

ato 

ET Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

parcelsareyou | [] vest 

[] No*

Page 2

STE 

Hrs 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that appiy) 

[OJ True Cash and Taxable Value 

[J Poverty Exemption 

[J Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[J Disabled Veterans Exemption 

[J Uncapping of Taxable Value 

[0 Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

[J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a 

[J Classification 

Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Year(s) you are appealing: 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [mm] Yes 

[} No 

if Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [} March 

0 July 

Od December 

If No, check the applicable reason(s): 

0 

Not required to attend 

A Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner 

[I] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5)

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

© DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identifi 

Af Number: 

Classification of AW. 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

a 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

62 Heo. 

Current Taxable Value as 200 by the BOR: 

E250 

9. 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

\ ooo. 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

S\N ede, 

Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* 

Parcel Identification Number: 

© 

9 

1 

22\ ©63%\ 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

a 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

* What do you believe is the property's classification? 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

a 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Ifimproved property, how is the property currently being used? 

S\oaag 

Ifimproved property, for what Usejwas the property designed? 

<PFoarano 

@

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

. 

DIRECTOR 

Fee Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? 

1 Yes 

0 No 

Are you appealing ONLY the dental of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 

0 Yes 

} No 

If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be uscd to determine your filing fee, plus 

$25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. 

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$125.00 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

$Over $500,000.00 

$300.00 

If your property is 

NOT residential property (see MCL. 205.762) and 

- 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Fiting Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00 

* plus $26.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. 

If your properly is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention Is $100,000.01 or greater the 

appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunat petition must be filed. 

Signature required 

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

Ist

Page 5

Soka 

& tuMayMe

Bul Biber dol

AS Gos Ss

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Chaker Y Ben Haj Mohamed,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003371

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: September 5, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Chaker Y Ben Haj Mohamed,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003371

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: September 5, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

MAY 80204 

_ ola 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Siwall Claims Petition; if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First Name 

M.l. 

Last Name/Company Name 

cHaler 

y 

2 enn May Mow 

aru od 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

I 

TRARY 

R uot 

da lo 

=X 

City or Towh 

State 

ZIP Code 

oan 

sie Ha 

MT] 

(F127 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

5X RX3025777 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Ruck tng Saluda \S @) rail «Conn 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Bnei 

ato 

ET Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

parcelsareyou | [] vest 

[] No*

Page 2

STE 

Hrs 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that appiy) 

[OJ True Cash and Taxable Value 

[J Poverty Exemption 

[J Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[J Disabled Veterans Exemption 

[J Uncapping of Taxable Value 

[0 Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

[J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a 

[J Classification 

Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Year(s) you are appealing: 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [mm] Yes 

[} No 

if Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [} March 

0 July 

Od December 

If No, check the applicable reason(s): 

0 

Not required to attend 

A Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner 

[I] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5)

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

© DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identifi 

Af Number: 

Classification of AW. 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

a 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

62 Heo. 

Current Taxable Value as 200 by the BOR: 

E250 

9. 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

\ ooo. 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

S\N ede, 

Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* 

Parcel Identification Number: 

© 

9 

1 

22\ ©63%\ 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

a 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

* What do you believe is the property's classification? 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

a 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Ifimproved property, how is the property currently being used? 

S\oaag 

Ifimproved property, for what Usejwas the property designed? 

<PFoarano 

@

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

. 

DIRECTOR 

Fee Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? 

1 Yes 

0 No 

Are you appealing ONLY the dental of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 

0 Yes 

} No 

If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be uscd to determine your filing fee, plus 

$25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. 

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$125.00 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

$Over $500,000.00 

$300.00 

If your property is 

NOT residential property (see MCL. 205.762) and 

- 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Fiting Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00 

* plus $26.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. 

If your properly is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention Is $100,000.01 or greater the 

appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunat petition must be filed. 

Signature required 

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

Ist

Page 5

Soka 

& tuMayMe

Bul Biber dol

AS Gos Ss

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.