Benjoe Property LLC, Petitioner V City Of Detroit, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Benjoe Property LLC
- Respondent
- City Of Detroit
Case overview
- Docket number
- 24-003470-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Wayne
- Judge
- Mulchay, Sean
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | A Stipulation has been received. | Not recorded | 12 | 06/23/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 13 | Granted | PET | 12 | 06/23/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 12 | Amended Stipulation | PET | Not recorded | 06/20/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 11 | Order Denying Motion | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/12/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 10 | A Stipulation has been received. | PET | Not recorded | 06/10/2025 | $25.00 | Download |
| 9 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/03/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | Notice of Hearing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 04/14/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | A hearing has been scheduled | Not recorded | Not recorded | 04/14/2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| 6 | Notice of Filing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 12/02/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Attachments to the Answer were filed | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/02/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/02/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 09/17/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/17/2024 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/31/2024 | $250.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Benjoe Property LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003470 City of Detroit, Presiding Judge Respondent. Marcus L. Abood ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the Stipulation and finds that it comports with the mandates of State law.1 As a result, the Tribunal shall enter the parties’ Stipulation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise indicated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2013, through June 30, 2016, at the rate of 4.25%, (ii) after June 30, 2016, through December 31, 2016, at the rate of 4.40%, (iii) after December 31, 2016, through June 30, 2017, at the rate of 4.50%, (iv) after June 30, 1 See MCL 211.27a. 2 See MCL 205.755.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003470 Page 2 of 2 2017, through December 31, 2017, at the rate of 4.70%, (v) after December 31, 2017, through June 30, 2018, at the rate of 5.15%, (vi) after June 30, 2018, through December 31, 2018, at the rate of 5.41%, (vii) after December 31, 2018, through June 30, 2019, at the rate of 5.9%, (viii) after June 30, 2019, through December 31, 2019, at the rate of 6.39%, (ix) after December 31, 2019, through June 30, 2020, at the rate of 6.40%, (x) after June 30 2020, through December 31, 2020, at the rate of 5.63%, (xi) after December 31, 2020, through June 30, 2022, at the rate of 4.25%, (xii) after June 30, 2022, through December 31, 2022, at the rate of 4.27%, (xiii) after December 31, 2022, through June 30, 2023, at the rate of 5.65%, (xiv) after June 30, 2023, through December 31, 2023, at the rate of 8.25%, (xv) after December 31, 2023, through June 30, 2024, at the rate of 9.30%, (xvi) after June 30, 2024, through December 31, 2024, at the rate of 9.50%, (xvii) after December 31, 2024, through June 30, 2025, at the rate of 9.47%, and (xviii) after June 30, 2025, through December 31, 2025, at the rate of 8.66%. This Consent Judgment resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. See docket look up for a copy of stipulation and for any possible refund paragraph. By Entered: June 23, 2025 tr PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Benjoe Property LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION A" MTT Docket No. 24-003470 City of Detroit, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on June 10, 2025, and finds that: the petition appeals parcel number 17009934.002L, however, the stipulation lists parcel number 17009934.002. Thus, it appears that the parcel on the stipulation is not at issue in this appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the previously-scheduled hearing shall proceed as scheduled. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this Order, no additional filing fee is required. ; By Marcus L. Abood, Tribunal Member Entered: June 12, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE | certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 811 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Benjoe Property LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003470 City of Detroit, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on June 10, 2025, and finds that: the petition appeals parcel number 17009934.002L, however, the stipulation lists parcel number 17009934.002. Thus, it appears that the parcel on the stipulation is not at issue in this appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the previously-scheduled hearing shall proceed as scheduled. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this Order, no additional filing fee is required. - By Marcus L. Abood, Tribunal Member Entered: June 12, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE | certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEMS Benjoe Property LLC Petitioner, MTT Docket No. 24-003470 City of Detroit Respondent, STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT 1. The case is pending in the ___ Entire Tribunal OR _X __ Small Claims Division. 2. The subject property is in _WAYNE County. 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board Property Parcel No. 17099934.0021, (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a corapleted Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 4. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2024 170,000 85.000 70,040 3 The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2024 90,000 ; 45,000 45,000
Page 4
Docket #24-003478 on If stipulation addresses tax years other than fhe tax year originally appealed or tax years added through motions to amend that
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Benjoe Property LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION A" MTT Docket No. 24-003470 City of Detroit, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on June 10, 2025, and finds that: the petition appeals parcel number 17009934.002L, however, the stipulation lists parcel number 17009934.002. Thus, it appears that the parcel on the stipulation is not at issue in this appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the previously-scheduled hearing shall proceed as scheduled. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this Order, no additional filing fee is required. ; By Marcus L. Abood, Tribunal Member Entered: June 12, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE | certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 811 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Benjoe Property LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003470 City of Detroit, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on June 10, 2025, and finds that: the petition appeals parcel number 17009934.002L, however, the stipulation lists parcel number 17009934.002. Thus, it appears that the parcel on the stipulation is not at issue in this appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the previously-scheduled hearing shall proceed as scheduled. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this Order, no additional filing fee is required. - By Marcus L. Abood, Tribunal Member Entered: June 12, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE | certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEMS Benjoe Property LLC Petitioner, MTT Docket No. 24-003470 City of Detroit Respondent, STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT 1. The case is pending in the ___ Entire Tribunal OR _X __ Small Claims Division. 2. The subject property is in _WAYNE County. 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board Property Parcel No. 17099934.0021, (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a corapleted Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 4. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2024 170,000 85.000 70,040 3 The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2024 90,000 ; 45,000 45,000
Page 4
Docket #24-003478 on If stipulation addresses tax years other than fhe tax year originally appealed or tax years added through motions to amend that
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Benjoe Property LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003470 City of Detroit, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on June 10, 2025, and finds that: the petition appeals parcel number 17009934.002L, however, the stipulation lists parcel number 17009934.002. Thus, it appears that the parcel on the stipulation is not at issue in this appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the previously-scheduled hearing shall proceed as scheduled. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this Order, no additional filing fee is required. By _____________________________ Marcus L. Abood, Tribunal Member Entered: June 12, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Benjoe Property LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003470 City of Detroit, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on June 10, 2025, and finds that: the petition appeals parcel number 17009934.002L, however, the stipulation lists parcel number 17009934.002. Thus, it appears that the parcel on the stipulation is not at issue in this appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the previously-scheduled hearing shall proceed as scheduled. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this Order, no additional filing fee is required. By _____________________________ Marcus L. Abood, Tribunal Member Entered: June 12, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 24-003470 Page 3 of 3
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEMS Benjoe Property LLC Petitioner, MTT Docket No. 24-003470 City of Detroit Respondent, STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT 5 The case is pending in the ____ Entire Tribunal OR - XSmall Claims Division. 2. The subject property is in _ WAYNE __ County. 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board Property Parcel No. 17009934.002 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 4, The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2024 170,000 85,000 70,040 Se The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2024 90,000 45,000 45,000
Page 2
Docket # 24-003470 6. If stipulation addresses tax years other than the tax year originally appealed or tax years added through motions to amend that have been granted by the Tribunal, list the separate facts upon which the parties rely to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over those tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 7. List all reasons (with explanation) why the stipulation’s taxable value does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable inflation rate. (e.g. transfer of ownership, additions, losses, omitted property etc . . J 8. List separately any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of this Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): The Petitioner and their agent hereto agree and stipulate that any order or decision of the Michigan Tax Tribunal which may result in a refund shall be made payable to PropTax America for distribution. Refund payments shall be forwarded to the following address: yd i PropTax America EA 26923 Havelock / pe Dearborn Heights, Mi 48127 ) Toners Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Fi ~~] Fa Printed Name Sam Miller / PropTax America Date: 6/7/2025 Ps » Signature of Respondent’s authorized representative: 5 Stacy Smith Printed Name y Date: 6/10/25 [Consent Judgment will be prepared by the Tribunal.]
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-003470 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City of Detroit (Wayne) First Name Jean-Philippe M.I. Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government Saulnier Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2 Woodward Ave. City or Town Detroit State Michigan ZIP Code 48226 Telephone Number 313-939-0127 Fax Number E-mail Address assessorscbdcommercial@detroitmi.gov Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Stacy M.I. Last Name Smith Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2 Woodward ave, Suite 804 Commercial Industrial City or Town Detroit State Michigan ZIP Code 48226 Telephone Number 3135250567 Fax Number E-mail Address smithsta@detroitmi.gov Section 3: Subject Property Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. Yes Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR The subject property is fairly assessed and in line with similar properties within the City of Detroit. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, cite the Board’s authority. Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? If yes, explain. Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? If so, what is the issue date? Michigan IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 17009934.002L Classification of Property: Real Commercial Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 85,000 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 70,040 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 170,060 Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 85,000 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Stacy Smith
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Benjoe Property LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No.: 24-003470 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF IN-PERSON HEARING The Tribunal has scheduled a hearing to be conducted in-person as follows. Hearings are generally 30 minutes in length. HEARING DATE: June 23, 2025 HEARING TIME: 11:30 AM EST HEARING LOCATION: Wayne County-Cadillac Place Building (4) 3026 W Grand Blvd, 2nd Floor Annex, Hearing Room 4 Detroit, MI 48202 This is an important legal document. Please have someone translate the document. Este es un documento legal importante. Por favor, haga traducir este documento. এটি একটি গুরুত্বপূর্ণ আইনি দলিল, অনুগ্রহ করে কেউ দলিলটিকে অনুবাদ করুন। .ةقيثولا مجرتت صخش كيدل ىجري ةماه ةينوناق ةقيثو وه اذه Ito ay isang mahalagang legal na dokumento. Mangyari lamang na magkaroon ng isang tao isalin ang dokumento.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003470 Page 2 of 12 HEARING INFORMATION – PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY GENERAL INFORMATION: An impartial hearing will be conducted in accordance with the Michigan Tax Tribunal Rules (R 792.10201-R 792.10297) and the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act, MCL 24.201 et seq. The Michigan Rules of Evidence and the Michigan Court Rules may be applicable. A party is expected to exercise proper respect and courtesy toward other parties, witnesses and administrative law judges, which includes attending the hearing on time, silencing cell phones, and dressing in appropriate clothing for in-person hearings. The hearing may be recorded for notetaking purposes, but the recording is not a formal record, unless otherwise provided for by the Tribunal. REPRESENTATION: You may have an attorney or anyone else of your choice represent you at the hearing. The Tribunal does not recommend or appoint representatives for you and will not pay for your representative. WITNESSES: You may have anyone join you at the hearing to speak in support of your case. However, the time to present your case is limited and additional time may not be provided to accommodate witness testimony. DOCUMENTATION: Parties are required to submit all documents in support of their contentions to the Tribunal and the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents were previously submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be submitted by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to submission by e-mail. If sent by mail, the documents must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized representative at the address identified in the petition or answer for that party or authorized representative, unless the party or authorized representative filed an appearance or other documentation identifying a different mailing address. The documents do not need to be resubmitted after the Notice of Hearing if they were previously submitted to the Tribunal and the opposing party. If a hearing had previously been scheduled in this case and adjourned, and the adjournment order indicates that the parties are precluded from submitting any further documentary evidence, no further documentary evidence will be accepted even if filed and exchanged, as indicated above. Inclusion of Subsequent Tax Years: Subsequent tax year assessments are automatically included in a valuation appeal once the assessment has been established for that tax year unless the Tribunal grants the exclusion of the subsequent tax year. For purposes of administrative efficiency, the Tribunal considers this date April 1st. As such, the parties should be prepared to discuss all additional assessments at hearings to be conducted on or after April 1st. If the hearing is to be conducted prior to April 1st, taxpayers would be required to file a new petition and, if necessary, protest the subsequent tax year assessment at the March Board of Review for that tax year. MOTIONS/REQUESTS: A motion is a written request filed by a party asking the Tribunal to take certain action. The following motions and requests (including subpoenas) may be filed by either party regarding
Page 3
MT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Benjoe Property LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003470 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-003470 Page 2 of 6 If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or email taxtrib@michigan.gov. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: December 2, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Benjoe Property LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003470 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local
Page 4
MT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Benjoe Property LLC , Petitioner, v. MTT Docket No. 24-003470 City Of Detroit, Respondent. ___________________________ PROOF OF SERVICE On 10/02/2024, I emailed the Respondent’s Answer, Proof of Service, Valuation Report, Assessment Notice, and Record Card for this appeal to: Michigan Tax Tribunal PO Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 And e-mailed a copy to Petitioner’s Representative: Sam Miller 26923 Havelock Dearborn Heights, MI 48127 [nassco123@yahoo.com] I declare that the statement above is true to the best of my information, knowledge, and belief. Stacg Smith Dated : 10/02/2024 Stacy Smith Appraiser II, MCAO Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 2 Woodward Ave., Suite 804 Detroit, Michigan 48226
Page 2
ARCHIVED Valuation Report DB: Detroit-24 10/01/2024 01:28 PM 85,000 85,000 85,000 70,040 70,040 0 2024 Assessed MBOR S.E.V. Capped ->Taxable<- PRE/MBT 0 5,300 0 0 3,335 0 2024 New Eq. Adjustment Loss Additions Tax Adjustment Losses 79,700 79,700 79,700 66,705 5.00 2023 Assessed MBOR S.E.V. Base for Cap C.P.I. Est. TCV/Total Floor Area = 43.88, Most recent sale 01/18/2019 for 65,000 2024 Est. T.C.V. 17009934.002L = 170,060 Total Estimated True Cash Value of Commercial/Industrial Buildings = 117,800 Replacement Cost/Floor Area= 175.81 Est. TCV/Floor Area= 30.39 ECF (CGOB-OFFICE BUILDINGS-GENERAL <7500 SQFT)0.293 => TCV of Bldg: 1 = 117,800 Total Depreciated Cost = 0 Eff.Age:26 Phy.%Good/Abnr.Phy./Func./Econ./Overall %Good: 59 /100/100/100/59.0 Reproduction/Replacement Cost = 0 Architectural Multiplier: 1.07 Total Cost New = 0 Item Desciption Col. Rate SqFt Adj. Adj. Cost Cost # or Height Storys Costs taken from Segregated Cost Section 5: Offices, Banks, Hospitals <<<<< Segregated Cost Computations >>>>> Total Depreciated Cost = 402,049 Eff.Age:26 Phy.%Good/Abnr.Phy./Func./Econ./Overall %Good: 59 /100/100/100/59.0 Reproduction/Replacement Cost = 681,439 Total Floor Area: 3,876 Base Cost New of Upper Floors = 681,439 Adjusted Square Foot Cost for Upper Floors = 175.81 (10) Heating system: Forced Air Furnace Cost/SqFt: 20.62 100% Base Rate for Upper Floors = 155.19 Overall Building Height: 13 Stories: 1 Story Height: 13 Perimeter: 254 Class: C Quality: Average <<<<< Calculator Cost Computations >>>>> Costs are taken from the Office Buildings cost schedules. Description of Occupancy: BLDG. 1, SEC. 1 Cost Estimates for Commercial/Industrial Building/Section: 1 Built 1966 Total Estimated Land Improvements True Cash Value = 9,754 D/W/P: 4in Concrete 7.76 505 20 784 D/W/P: Asphalt Paving 3.45 13000 20 8,970 Description Rate Size % Good Cash Value Land Improvement Cost Estimates 0.52 Total Acres Total Est. Land Value = 42,506 cgmt sq ft rates 22,674.000 Sq Ft 1.87 100 42,506 Description Frontage Depth Front Depth Rate %Adj. Reason Value * Factors * Land Value Estimates for Land Table CGMT.COMMERCIAL GENERAL MEDIUM TRAFFIC Map #: 17 CITY OF DETROIT , 48234 Property Class: 201 20060 VAN DYKE 17009934.002L 2024 Est. T.C.V. BENJOE PROPERTY LLC
Page 3
ARCHIVED 0 00 170,060.00 MARKET VALUE Questions regarding the Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification may be directed to the following: 9. YEAR BUILT (ACTUAL AGE): The 2024 Inflation Rate Multiplier is: 1.05 7. ESTIMATED TRUE CASH VALUE (MARKET VALUE): 6. ASSESSOR CHANGE REASON: 8. EFFECTIVE AGE: X Exempt As "Qualified Forest Property": Exempt As "Development Property": THIS IS NOT A TAX BILL X No Yes Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification Michigan Department of Treasury, 1019 (Rev, 11-23) ACCORDING TO MCL 211.34c THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 5. There WAS/WAS NOT a transfer of ownership on this property in 1. TAXABLE VALUE (Current amount is tentative): % Exempt As "Qualified Agricultural Property": PARCEL IDENTIFICATION Legal Description: 5,300 85,000 The change in taxable value will increase/decrease your tax bill for this year by approximately: 5,300 PROPERTY ADDRESS: No Yes PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION FARMINGTON HILLS MI 48331 NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL PARCEL NUMBER: This form is issued under the authority of P.A. 206 of 1893, Sec. 211.24 (c) and Sec.211.34c, as amended. This is a model assessment notice to be used by the local assessor. L-4400 FROM: CITY OF DETROIT OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR 2 WOODWARD AVE., SUITE 804 DETROIT, MI 48226 17009934.002L BENJOE PROPERTY
Page 4
ARCHIV
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-003470 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City of Detroit (Wayne) First Name Jean-Philippe M.I. Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government Saulnier Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2 Woodward Ave. City or Town Detroit State Michigan ZIP Code 48226 Telephone Number 313-939-0127 Fax Number E-mail Address assessorscbdcommercial@detroitmi.gov Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Stacy M.I. Last Name Smith Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2 Woodward ave, Suite 804 Commercial Industrial City or Town Detroit State Michigan ZIP Code 48226 Telephone Number 3135250567 Fax Number E-mail Address smithsta@detroitmi.gov Section 3: Subject Property Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. No Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR The subject property is fairly assessed and in uniformity with like properties in the City of Detroit. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, cite the Board’s authority. Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? If yes, explain. Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? If so, what is the issue date? Michigan IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 17009934.002L Classification of Property: Real Commercial Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 85,000 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 70,040 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 170,060 Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 70,040 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Stacy Smith
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
rg STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information First Name M.L Last Name/Company Name Benjoe Property LLC Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Petitioner’s Astormey/Authorized Representative’ S Contact Information First Name Last Name Sam Miller rm Name (if an, n ret prop Tax America Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 26923 Havelock City or Town State ZIP Code Dearborn Heights MI 48127 Telephone Number Fax Number 313-377-1447 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) nassco123@yahoo.com Section 3: Subject Property Information How many If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? parcelsareyou | [[] ves* [] No** appealing? *If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.
Page 2
es
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON |. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check al that apply)
True Cash and Taxable Value
O Poverty Exemption
0) Taxable Value Only (calculation)
[J Disabled Veterans Exemption
"1 Uncapping of Taxable Value
[J Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA)
[J exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a
[J Classification
Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption)
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
SEV is too high
Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
Year(s) you are appealing:
2024
Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [Wm] Yes
No
If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [] March
[J duly
[[] December
If No, check the applicable reason(s):
Not required to attend
[] Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner
[| Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact {if yes, include explanation in Section 5)
0 Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission OrderPage 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 7: Valuation Information ruse the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels, Parcel tdentification Number: 17009934.002L Classification of Property: Rea Personal (check one) Agricultural Compare! Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) [4 Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 85,000 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 70,040 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 50,000 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 25,000 if you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value, 45,040 Section 8: Classification Information *Only the M) Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal® Parcel Identification Number: Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: Real Pergonal (check one) 0 Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) What do you believe is the property’s classification? Real Personal (check one) O Agricultural Commercial industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) If improved property, how is the property currently being used? If improved property, for what use was the property designed?
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as
Page 5
[ad
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Benjoe Property LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003470 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: September 17, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Benjoe Property LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 24-003470 City of Detroit, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: September 17, 2024 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
rg STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information First Name M.L Last Name/Company Name Benjoe Property LLC Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Petitioner’s Astormey/Authorized Representative’ S Contact Information First Name Last Name Sam Miller rm Name (if an, n ret prop Tax America Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 26923 Havelock City or Town State ZIP Code Dearborn Heights MI 48127 Telephone Number Fax Number 313-377-1447 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) nassco123@yahoo.com Section 3: Subject Property Information How many If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? parcelsareyou | [[] ves* [] No** appealing? *If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.
Page 2
es
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON |. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check al that apply)
True Cash and Taxable Value
O Poverty Exemption
0) Taxable Value Only (calculation)
[J Disabled Veterans Exemption
"1 Uncapping of Taxable Value
[J Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA)
[J exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a
[J Classification
Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption)
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
SEV is too high
Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
Year(s) you are appealing:
2024
Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [Wm] Yes
No
If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [] March
[J duly
[[] December
If No, check the applicable reason(s):
Not required to attend
[] Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner
[| Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact {if yes, include explanation in Section 5)
0 Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission OrderPage 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 7: Valuation Information ruse the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels, Parcel tdentification Number: 17009934.002L Classification of Property: Rea Personal (check one) Agricultural Compare! Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) [4 Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 85,000 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 70,040 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 50,000 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 25,000 if you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value, 45,040 Section 8: Classification Information *Only the M) Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal® Parcel Identification Number: Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: Real Pergonal (check one) 0 Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) What do you believe is the property’s classification? Real Personal (check one) O Agricultural Commercial industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) If improved property, how is the property currently being used? If improved property, for what use was the property designed?
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as
Page 5
[ad
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.