Record Finder / 25-003018-TT
Michigan

Alex Lentz, Petitioner V City Of Farmington Hills, Respondent

Petitioner
Alex Lentz
Respondent
City Of Farmington Hills

Case overview

Docket number
25-003018-TT
Status
Hearing Set - SC
CaseType
SC Property
Division
Small Claims Division
County
Oakland
Judge
Klukowski, Nancy

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
9Notice of HearingNot recordedNot recorded10/20/2026Not recordedDownload
8A hearing has been scheduledNot recordedNot recorded10/20/2026Not recordedNot recorded
7Notice of FilingNot recordedNot recorded11/21/2025Not recordedDownload
6Attachments to the Answer were filedRESPNot recorded10/10/2025Not recordedDownload
5Answer was receivedNot recordedNot recorded10/10/2025Not recordedDownload
4Petition has been verifiedPET109/23/2025Not recordedDownload
3Notice of Docket Number SCNot recordedNot recorded09/23/2025Not recordedDownload
2Attachments to the Petition were filedNot recordedNot recorded07/31/2025Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded07/31/2025$125.00Download

Documents

SC_Notice_of_Telephonic_Hearing.2026-10-20_07-38-49.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Alex Lentz,

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

MTT Docket No.: 25-003018

City Of Farmington Hills, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF TELEPHONE HEARING

The Tribunal has scheduled a telephone hearing to be conducted as follows. Hearings are 

generally 30 minutes in length. 

HEARING DATE:

December 23, 2026 

HEARING TIME:

11:30 AM Eastern Time

JOIN BY PHONE:

1-248-509-0316

ACCESS CODE:

577108031 

 

This hearing will be held by telephone conference call with the Judge as the host. In order to join 

the hearing, call the phone number listed above at least 5 minutes prior to the hearing time. You 

will then be required to input the access code, followed by # to connect. The Tribunal judge will call 

in and join by phone at the hearing time. Failure to timely call in may result in the placement of a 

party or parties in default.

This is an important legal document. Please have someone translate the document.

Este es un documento legal importante. Por favor, haga traducir este documento.

এটি একটি গুরুত্বপূর্ণ আইনি দলিল, অনুগ্রহ করে কেউ দলিলটিকে অনুবাদ করুন।

.ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺛﻴﻘﺔ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻴﺔ ﻫﺎﻣﺔ ﻳﺮﺟﻰ ﻟﺪﻳﻚ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺗﺘﺮﺟﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﻴﻘﺔ

Ito ay isang mahalagang legal na dokumento. Mangyari lamang na magkaroon ng isang tao isalin ang 

dokumento.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-003018

Page 2 of 4

HEARING INFORMATION – PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY

GENERAL INFORMATION: An impartial hearing will be conducted in accordance with the Michigan Tax 

Tribunal Rules (R 792.10201-R 792.10297) and the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act, MCL 24.201 et 

seq. The Michigan Rules of Evidence and the Michigan Court Rules may be applicable. Parties are expected 

to exercise proper respect and courtesy toward other parties, witnesses, and administrative law judges, which 

includes attending the hearing on time, silencing cell phones, and choosing a quiet, private location to 

participate in the hearing to limit distractions and ensure minimal background noise. The hearing may be 

recorded for notetaking purposes, but the recording is not a formal record, unless otherwise provided for by the 

Tribunal.

REPRESENTATION: You may have an attorney or anyone else of your choice represent you at the hearing. 

The Tribunal does not recommend or appoint representatives for you and will not pay for your representative.

WITNESSES: You may have anyone join you at the hearing to speak in support of your case. However, the 

time to present your case is limited and additional time may not be provided to accommodate witness 

testimony.

DOCUMENTATION: Parties are required to submit all documents in support of their contentions to both the 

Tribunal and the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents were 

previously submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the 

documents are not timely submitted to both the Tribunal and the opposing party, the documents may be 

excluded. Documents may be submitted to the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s electronic filing (e-

filing) system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to 

submission by e-mail. If sent by mail, the documents must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized 

representative at the address identified in the petition or answer for that party or authorized representative, 

unless the party or authorized representative filed an appearance or other documentation identifying a different 

mailing address. The documents do not need to be resubmitted after the Notice of Hearing if they were 

previously submitted to the Tribunal and the opposing party in this case.

If a hearing had previously been scheduled in this case and adjourned, and the adjournment order indicates 

that the parties are precluded from submitting any further documentary evidence, no further documentary 

evidence will be accepted even if filed and exchanged as indicated above.

INCLUSION OF SUBSEQUENT TAX YEARS: Subsequent tax year assessments are automatically included 

in valuation appeals once the assessment has been established for that tax year. For purposes of 

administrative efficiency, the Tribunal considers this date April 1st. As such, the parties should submit 

documentation and be prepared to discuss subsequent tax year assessments at hearings to be conducted on 

or after April 1st in a subsequent year. If the hearing is to be conducted prior to April 1st in a subsequent year, 

taxpayers are required to file a new petition and, if necessary, protest the subsequent tax year assessment at 

the March Board of Review for that year. 

MOTIONS/REQUESTS: A motion is a written request filed by a party asking the Tribunal to take certain action. 

The following motions and requests may be filed by either party regarding the scheduled hearing. Motions and 

requests may be submitted to the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Motions and 

requests may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to submission by e-mail. If 

sent by mail, motions and requests must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized representative at the 

address identified in the petition or answer for that party or authorized representative, unless the party or 

authorized representative filed an appearance or other documentation identifying a different mailing address. 

1. Motion to Adjourn: Parties may request the hearing be rescheduled (i.e. adjourned). The motion must be 

submitted to both the Tribunal and the opposing party at least 28 days before the hearing unless there are 

emergency circumstances. The emergency circumstances must be detailed to justify the granting of what

Page 3

MTT

Page 4

M

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC-Notice_of_Filing_of_Answer.2025-11-21_09-50-55.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Alex Lentz,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-003018

City Of Farmington Hills,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Users who file documents with the Michigan Tax Tribunal are advised that filed 

documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tax 

Docket Lookup. Users who file documents are responsible for ensuring sensitive or 

personal identifying information is withheld or redacted. See TTR 209. If a user wishes 

to file a document for consideration by the Michigan Tax Tribunal and prevent its 

publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order 

under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the 

Order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order 

will be published.

The responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from 

all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and 

their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or 

screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A 

party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may 

request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously-filed document by

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-003018

Page 2 of 6

submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form will be 

available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of our website. 

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an 

appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan 

Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan 

Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal 

settlement conference process.

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or 

email taxtrib@michigan.gov.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: November 21, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Alex Lentz,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-003018

City Of Farmington Hills,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing

Page 4

MTT

Page 5

ST

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

12075501 

10££°9/T 

102L8TT 

050°8S 

2207) 

¥3UIN3 Viva 

£T0Z/TZ/0T dvW 

206£°0TT 

| 

i 

069°£61 

0£8°62T 

098°€9 

£707 

QILDIJSNI 

STOZ/¥0/TT dvW 

202€°9TT 

| 

| 

06£°S6T 

0€S ‘TET 

098°€9 

vZQZ 

¥3INI Vvva 

¥Z0Z/0E/IT HAM 

| 

' 

B 

: 

Bi 

B 

NOLL 

LIT 

NQLL” 

LIT 

06% 6TT 

0£9°8ST 

i098 

°€9 

SZ0Z 

3'ym 

uaym 

ym 

i 

an|eA 

| Jea0 

i 

MD LADY 

sn ea 

anLeA 

ELEN 

| 

91gBxel 

 /|Bunqidl 

40 p.ROg 

passassy 

burp) Lng 

Ipue] 

BRA 

uteld pooid 

; 

pue| 1am 

duLARY 

hUTREWELE 

UY 

puod 

papaon 

“ISN OL 

due 

"4000 

po deaspuen 

VAY 

hy 

MoT 

WOY4 S80

BuLL Lod 

“

{3A01 

x 

TVIN

: 

¥v3Y HL

. 

931LS 

NOTLDId

i 

40 Aydeubodo. 

WIINIM 

| 

| 

“s(ian punodBdspun! 

| 

3IAVH 

| 

‘ 

_ 

J 

| 

H FAR 

= 9N|BA ysed 

snub SUBWRACI dw 

puel 

palBWLISI 

[BIOL 

SDLILL LIN 

pJdEpUBlS 

1 

Hed 

6. 

I 

00-002 “I 

ONIAYISANY 

S3yBLT 289.18 

Bods 

L 

OlOHd M3

INL BA YSeD 

Pood % ¥ZLS 

Srey 

uo11dLdosag 

an. 

(s)wear soBLd 

Ui 1Lun 

qdns: 

249 

gs 

991 

679 

239.00U05 ULp 

id/M/d 

sen| 

X 

| 

Q3NZ

7583¢2 

62 

00bT 

26°3 

33943003 Ulp 

:d/iM/a 

PINERCTEI 

IE 

%0T 3A

Shien ysed 

PooS B2LS 

35en 

uoisd i550 

Jomas 

| 

S9jeW1s3 3500 ludwanoldwi pues 

| 

Jaren) 

x 

A[emep 

Ls 

JBMIS 

WJ03RS 

0TL* TT 

= BN|BA PUB 

"3S3 

[BIOL 

S9JDV 

[BIOL /§7Z7 

‘199d 1uOJd4 

[BNAdY 99T 

peoY pared) 

X | ¢zc 

m 

9

2°19 

00T 

G00‘SE 

S349V £8°T 

 S3WDV 00°S-TO'T SILVY FOVIUV 

pecy |aARJS) 

a LIN

099 

00T 

000°99 

5942v 00°T 

S3WV 00°T-0 SILYY IVAW 

peo a01dl 

| Mm 30 0-0

0 

voseoy 

-00L, 

O., 

0000°T 0000°T 02/268 967591 T 30viNOud 

po 

909-

aNn|eA 

¥ 

CLpvy 

e3wy 

a 22013 

yadag 

eIUoLd 

 uoLadLadS?Q 

sauBuB 

0. duT 

40 2/1 

hs 

~ 

= 

r 

v 

| 

180 319v.L ONVI THQ 9)gel pueT 

JO] SB8IRWLISE SN|BA pue] 

JuedeA 

| 

psAoJdurl X 

| 

g3so1o] 

i 

: 

: 

‘ 

ZZT0018/2LSET| 

8961/10/60] 

6581 

:V4L/ADL ppSTsEE ADL 253 STOT 

a3so1d 

2ZTO0I8OHI | €TOT/ZL/€Q 

| 

¥IVd3d/¥31Tv/aav 

"$3d 

107 doL 

a3soo 

66TI6TAd|_6I0Z/90/TT 

| 

IYDINYHIIW 

%0 

__‘3°¥°'d 

N3dO 

ZZTO0TR0EZH 

§202/02/50 

© 

DNIQIINg 

ASIA 

HOS 

2I178Nd NOIONIWMVH 

:]o0yds 

$n3els: 

Jaqunn| 

31eq 

| 

(s)aLwddd bulp|ing 

:BULUOZ 

| ONJWI-TVIINIQISIY 

isse|D 

H 

g33al 

£91:¢0T0 

HIONIT 

S, WaV-€Q 

am_8861/T0/90 

|OTE‘80T 

00°00T 

asag 

6£.:2266S 

31V153-80 

am| 

$707/£0/7T 1000 SLE 

13VHOIW 

[ec] 

$25:0966S 

ATIWVA-60 

oD 

$202/42/2T.\T 

X31V 

LTsuBAL 

Ag 

abed 

dA) 

?1eq 

ERNE] 

Studd 

PRLILIBA 

JLT 

9 BS 

JO 

SWdel 

*1Sul 

9 

BS 

CARA) 

$202/01/0T 

uo pIAULLd 

pueye0 

:A3Unod 

STIIH NOLONIWYVH 40 ALID 

:uoLIDLpSLInC

Page 2

xxP933URJENG J0U ING S[YBL|

<<<<< 

*BuldLad 339[dwod Joy anoiuttd uorlenieA 39S 

-Huof 003 SuOLIR|ND{ED >>>>> 

sswe1r wns dunv 

sur-i|ing 

513des 

'|e9 0002 

swesg 991

694 

0Zv'T 

T 

48Mas DLLqnd 

o13des 

[ed 000T 

1ud1 

692 

0Zv'1T 

1 

Jelem oLlqnd 

Lom 191M 

2'09T 

‘

Jamas /ao3em 

JoMaS OLignd! 

T 

JJoddns 

%Ts 

SL 

9064 

807 

(Ad03s T) dom 

J93BM DL19Nd | T 

 (v) $4000 

‘ 

T¢ 

zz 

(A401s T) &22 

ger 

T 

goL.g 

b77 

Jusweseg :uoliepunod 

| 

4BMIS/ oem $449} 

4s 

40

AT 

84 

¥sT'8 

244 

(A403S 

TT) dom: 

UBy 

1UBA; 

(8) 

5400Q I

S9U240d | 5a03 |v qn DLwRLSD|Z 

is 

. 

. 

. 

SULBM 

S| LL DLWRJSD! 

4S 

UO L]

v6 

I~ 

8S 

€- 

T 

LLBM 

T 

:lLBM uowwod 

| 

61612 

065°0% 

C 

95 

h) 

0L3BPUNOd 

HD LIS 

Jorusns a oeels HO 

ous reaedos 

© 

ustutd J

QYSLULL) 

YIUI 

ZH 

:uoL 

L 

HLT 

: 

: 

pay 

4 

sobeJen 

SuLS 243X3 

J00[d4 

9

‘ 

19[L0L BJAXA, 

PCOM 

v6L 

L9%°T 

z 

2A0DLY GNL DLweds) 

Buioun|d 

on! 

PPT T 

€IT:C 

[4 

400[4 

| LL JLWEJDD 

tqunid 

oN 

sez‘ 

BET 

Y 

I 

yieg ounixis 

€ 

1BIH JIIBM JOS 

TOUGD 

BuLqunid 

Lenuen ‘4aulos| 

3208

‘ 

SIUSWASNLPY/SUOLILPPY JBY10 

Goes sumaxts 2 

l

£L0°2€T 

T06‘€¥2 

11e30L 

i 

N 

0°0 

:SasLo

908° T 

Jusuesey 

AOLag 

AJois 

1) 

yieg aJnixtd £7 

1500 

-udag 

MBN 150) 

3ZLS 

uolLyepunod 

J0LJ433X3 

$81L401S (S)PJnixid sbeiany 

| 

seady HuLpiLn 

burqunid 

(1) 

A

Lpitng 

— 

a 

R— 

‘4°S 0£0

QELSTVH 

$40 95MEsaq UoLleLd94daq 

0 Lwouosy 

—aodl 

| 

TPAVLT 

| 

AUBWI 

uoLy

$T*#5/56/00T/00T/2S=PO0D 9% *qUOD/U0D3/2und/Aud’ 

qv/Aud 

S1813N0 

"9913 40 

"ON 

3S 908T 

= B9JV J00(d 

dS 90ST 

= BSJV PUNOID 

TT. 

VE 

i 

$15NQ /M JLV PIDJOd 

1wILSAS Buljeen 

(TT) 

dbl 

| 

"RIO 

X 

xal 

| 

§94n3AxXLd 

JO 

*pend/'OoN 

| 

i 

8.6L 219 

al sid 

MOTYONNE 

 ApLwed 9)Buis 

T 

:Bpjg 

"sv JO4 

‘1S3 1500 

S51Au9s Samy 

007 

| 

s

: 100 

ue3sAs A1LIndas 

225°86T 

!°ATDL pIlewLlsa 

unnoeA 

[edlusd 

oLJ33913 

(TT) 

pela

(eddy jJodued) 

0T6°T 

X 

QTO'E9T 

:350) Jded 

[eaog| 

J03Deduod Ysedl 

S0BUINA DOOM 

peis

S

- 

Riv 

£9€°77E MON 9seg |ejoL 

eunes 

JLY [BJ43USD 

tafeJded Juwse 

. 

aBuey URa[D L|oS 

- 

- 

908T 

:®3JV JOOd 

bul cod/builesH 

oN 

: 

0 400d 

"JUD 

ON 

cp 

19By 

"29443 

sbuey pJepuels 

d 

TUX 

| 

0 

teddy abeuols 

a 

:sse(d 

SABMOID LI 

und 1esH 

2 H 

PLL

0 

:poos 

% 

"5 

De nea 

UIAD 

[00> 

§ 1E3H padJod 

jlews 

| 

9g 1BAJY 

oP Ro 

San 

© gniides 

Lzznder 

| 

®DBUJNd JOO[d/| 

EM 

$395

0 

154000 “YoRW 

on ro 

i 

qnL Lzzmoec! 

| 

J93esH 9drdS 

won 

0 154000 

"0INY 

is fal eon 

| 

WODJIIUI 

| 

EH 

| [BM DLJ1DB|3 

—P 

SBA iL poYsiULd, 

pasicol 

Z qeyeud 

POOH PS3IUSA| 

| 

(Jo0(4-ul) 3ueiped 

Uor1el

YDUI 7b 1uoLIepunod: 

ions 

T qesoid 

| 

POOH pajusaun 

jueLpey 

"|La8d "293 

991 POOM 

LLM T 

fl BM uowwod 

K402S 

7 JoLJDIXT 

| 

at aon 

pJeOgased DL43D9|3 

J9358 1d 

0 fiuaA wess 

£1015 

T JoLiexalT 

Jeyesy yaes 

433M 10H PIDUOH 

J al 

(A101s 

TD) dDM{80Z 

popLS omML 

| 

Lesodsiq abequesiT 

$15nQ /M 

J LV pedJod| 

X 

BueyJdan

At 

© 

see 5 

(A401S T) 

&IDi2Z 

JIBS DUwRS/pPUz 

| 

aByseMys alt 

$392Ng 0/M JLY PIdDJO4 

Bueyaan

es 

7 

:A3 Lomaden pe 

(A403S T) OM PTZ | Kuoas 

7 JOLJDIUT 

| 

dol ood 

LiLeod 

poom| 

| 

uor

8L61 

Il(ing JesA 

2dAL eady 

| A401S 

TT JOLJIIUT 

mo] ]y ®duelL|ddy! 

i 

jLo 

seni X 

ybno

© 

obedes (ZT) 

| SA99a/seyouod 

(9T) 

| 

sade |dadtd 

(ST) 

sut-iLLng 

(ST) 

Buriood/BuliesH 

(IT) 

(*3uod

$202/01/0T 

uo paiulld 

7ZT-00T-80-£7-77 

:49QUNN |9dJed

Page 3

§20Z/0T/0T 

uo pRAULIL 

£4 

274 

8 

£7 

#xxPOJIUBIENG 10U INQ 3|GRLL

ru BUPA X

Peajsien 00887 

221-001-80-E¢-22 

[3 

$0981 

Pr 

Haar 

Roya 

ES 

9% 

° 

Fra 

© 

£0VR 

Fear Lo 

Jusg INO-HeM 

T 40 T Buip(Lng [eLiuspLsey

Page 4

10

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

05._Property_Tax_Appeal_Answer_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.3658bed1-7515-4ad1-ac7a-8e81af552961.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-003018

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City Of Farmington Hills (OAKLAND)

First Name

Matt

M.I.

A.

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government

Dingman

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

31555 Eleven Mile Rd

City or Town

Farmington Hills

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48336

Telephone Number

248-871-2470

Fax Number

248-871-2471

E-mail Address

MTTForms@fhgov.com

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Aliyah

M.I.

Last Name

Whitelaw

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

31555 Eleven Mile

City or Town

Farmington Hills

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48336

Telephone Number

2488712470

Fax Number

E-mail Address

mttforms@fhgov.com

Section 3: Subject Property Information

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

No

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another.

N/A 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this 

document, you may be held in default.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Respondent contends that the assessment of the subject property, as affirmed by the Board of Review, does not exceed 50% of the marked value. Based on the 

market conditions in the area, we believe the property is lawfully and equitably assessed.

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? March*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

If yes, cite the Board’s authority.

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No

If yes, explain.

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

If so, what is the issue date?

N/A

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued?

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption:

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended:

Tax Year(s) denied:

List the date the exemption was denied:

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number:

22-23-08-100-122

Classification of Property:

Real 

Residential

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

167,770

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

167,770

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

335,544

Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

167,770

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Aliyah Whitelaw

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

01._Property_Tax_Appeal_Petition_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.9222e4b4-c6a5-4247-9363-0e1a4170a46a.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax 

disputes.

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Individual 

First Name

Alex

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

Lentz

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

22604 Chapoton

City or Town

St. Clair Shores

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48080

Telephone Number

3138204050

Fax Number

E-mail Address

dpx@dpx313.mygbiz.com

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

William

M.I.

E

Last Name

Semaan

Firm Name (if any)

Semaan Law PLLC

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

51 W Hancock

Suite 407

City or Town

Detroit

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48201

Telephone Number

313-263-7771

Fax Number

E-mail Address 

william@semaanlaw.com

Section 3: Subject Property Information

How many parcels are you appealing?

1

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

 *If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

28800 Halsted

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Farmington Hills

Michigan

48331

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Farmington Hills (OAKLAND)

County 

Oakland

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Value

 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal

Petitioner contends that the current assessments remain excessive and do not accurately reflect the subject property’s true cash value as of tax day, December 31, 

2024.

In support of the appeal, Petitioner relies on an appraisal by a certified general real estate appraiser concluding that the subject property had a true cash value of 

$315,000 as of December 31, 2024, and was in “poor condition,” requiring “an extreme amount of maintenance,” with portions deemed “dangerous” and structurally 

unsound. (See attached Appraisal).

After taking possession of the property, Petitioner discovered additional latent defects that further impair the property’s value and utility, including: (a) two 

inoperative residential heating oil tanks attached to the home, which required removal; (b) a dilapidated rear-yard shed, which must be demolished; (c) zonolite 

vermiculite insulation in the attic, a hazardous material requiring costly abatement; and (d) a major pipe break located beneath the garage that is causing water 

intrusion into the home and will require significant repair.

The subject property’s condition and the presence of these newly discovered defects materially reduce its market value beyond what was accounted for by the Board 

of Review.

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues

Year(s) you are appealing:

2025

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND upload the BOR decision: March

If No, check the applicable reason(s):

Did you request a Poverty Exemption at the BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR considered your application AND upload the BOR decision: 

 March  July  December

If No, explain why:

Section 7: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number: 22-23-08-100-122 

Classification of Property:

Real

Residential

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

167770

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

167770

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

250000 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

125000

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

125000

Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep’t of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal*

Parcel Identification Number:

 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:

What do you believe is the property’s classification?

If improved property, how is the property currently being used?

If improved property, for what use was the property designed?

Fee Information

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition?

No

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption?

No

If you answered yes to either or both of these questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees.

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is:

$100,000.00 and under $125.00

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00

$Over $500,000.00 $300.00

If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee

Page 4

STATE OF

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2025-09-23_14-02-11.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Alex Lentz,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-003018

City Of Farmington Hills,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: September 23, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Alex Lentz,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-003018

City Of Farmington Hills,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: September 23, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

BOR Petition - 28800 Halsted.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

Petition to Board of Review 

SicsPage 

180 

appt 

03/11/2025 

10:50 aM 

petition# O31 

| 4035 

This form is issued under the authority of P.A. 206 of 1893, as amended. Filing is voluntary, however you may not appeal to the Michigan Tax Tribunal or 

the State Tax Commission unless you first protest to the Board of Review 

TO BE COMPLETED BY OWNER OR OWNER'S AGENT 

Owner's Name (Please Print or Type) 

Petitioner's Name (If Other than Owner. Please Print or Type) 

LENTZ, ALEX 

Township or City 

County 

FARMINGTON HILLS 

OAKLAND 

The undersigned protests the assessed value and/or the tentative taxable value and/or the property classification and/or the qualified agricultural property exemption of 

the following described property: 

Property Identified (Parcel code required. Property address & legal description optional) 

: 

22-23-08-100-122 

TAN, ROE, SEC 8S 165.95 FT OF W 1/2 OF NW 1/4 EXC BEG AT PT DIST S 89-38-13 E 788.36 FT FROM W 1/4 

COR, THN 00-09-02 W 165.96 FT, TH S 89-38-13 £ 525 FT, TH $ 00-09-02 E 165.96 FT, THN 89-38-13 W 525 

28800 HALSTED 

FTTOBEG 3.00 A 10-12-94 FR 010 

School District: 

FARMINGTON PUBLIC SCH DIST 

Protested Item 

Wl Assessed Value 

[0 Tentative Taxable Value 

0 Classification 

OO Qualifed Agricultural 

Property Exemption 

1. 

PROTEST OF ASSESSMENT 

{Complete this section for a protest of assessed value and/or tentative taxable value) 

Assessed Amount 

[Owner's Estimated True Cash Value 

Tentative Taxable Value 

Year 

219,490 

308. 000 

219,490 

2025 

2. 

PROTEST OF CLASSIFICATION 

(Complete this section for a request to change the classification. The Board of Review must make their decision regarding classification in accordance 

with section 211.34¢ of the Michigan Compiled Laws. The Board of Review shall not be influenced by the effect that a particular classification has on 

that property's status as a homeowner's principal residence or qualified agricultural property.) 

Classification of property on this year's assessment roll: 

401 

Classification should be: (Please check one of the following) 

OO 

Agricultural 

[J Industrial 

OI Timber Cutover 

[Utility (Personal Property Only) 

[OJ commercial 

[1 Residential 

Obevelopmental 

3. 

PROTEST OF EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY 

(If the assessor has denied or changed the percentage of the exemption from the 18 mills of local school operating tax for qualified agricultural property, 

the owner may appeal this action to the March Board of Review. THE BOARD OF REVIEW HAS NO AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER OR ACT UPON THE 

EXEMPTION FROM THE 18 SCHOOL OPERATING MILLS FOR HOMEOWNER'S PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE PROPERTIES.) 

Percent qualified agricultural exemption granted by assessor: (Enter 0 if exemption is denied) 

Percent qualified agricultural exemption requested by Owner: (Enter 100 if fuil 

exemption requested) 

4. 

REASON FOR PROTEST 

State reason(s) for protest of assessed value and/or the tentative taxable value and/or classification and/or qualified agricultural property pr 

tion. 

pl 

Foor 

Meked Valve of howe 

15 

lomer dln 

puthae 

Pate 

of 

tent Convevense. Heme 

Js 

in very Powe Comte 

ten ( Polen devwitidin conde), Gee aftocted opp sed 

CERTIFICATION 

Signature 

Date 

It 

03/07/2025 

Swf Nv 

Address 

. 

Phone Number 

si Horeolle , ke YoF, Dehoifpnd 

4 g30) 

(596) 8qy-s515G 

www.michigan.gov/treasury

Page 2

Michigan Department of Treasury 

Form 618, Page 2 

FOR BOARD OF REVIEW USE ONLY 

INSTRUCTIONS: Incorporate a copy of this form and the assigned number in the Board of Review minutes. 

Petition Number 

Parcel Code 

0%) 

22-23-08-100-122 

1. ASSESSED VALUE 

Disposition by Board of SC Board of Review must state the reason for its action below. 

Assessed Value Changed From: 

219,490 

ro: 

lp 

7, 

7 70 

Record of Vote - Board or three member committee of board 

Chairperson: [ves 

[J no ya 

Member: 

JA ves 

[] Ka 

Member: 

of ves 

O va 

1 

~N 

Rdichon agpieed for lsses vader die. o prope condition 

If you disagree with the decision of the Board of Review regarding tentative assessed value, you may appeal that decision by filing a petition with the Michigan Tax Tribunal at 

P.0.Box 30232, Lansing, Mi. 48909. Commercial Real, Industrial Real, Developmental Real, Commercial Personal, Industrial Personal and Utility Personal Property may be 

appealed by May 31. Agricultural Real, Residential Real, Timber - Cut Over Real, and Agricultural Personal Property may be appealed by July 31. The petition must be filed on 

a Michigan Tax Tribunal for or a form approved by the Michigan Tax Tribunal. Michigan Tax Tribunal forms are available at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

Denied 

Initials 

2. TENTATIVE TAXABLE VALUE 

Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below. 

[| 

Denied 

Tentative Taxable Value Changed From: 

219,490 

To: 

17x 770 

Record of Vote - Board or three member committee of board. 

Pe 

Chairperson: a 

O - 

Member: ves 

[1 

No 

Sp 

Member: 

of ves 

0 DH 

SL 

0 

Reason for Board Action: 

If you disagree with the decision of the Board of Review regarding tentative assessed value, you may appeal that decision by filing a petition with the Michigan Tax Tribunal at 

P.0.Box 30232, Lansing, Mi. 48909. Commercial Real, Industrial Real, Developmental Real, Commercial Personal, Industrial Personal and Utility Personal Property may be 

appealed by May 31. Agricultural Real, Residential Real, Timber - Cut Over Real, and Agricultural Personal Property may be appealed by July 31. The petition must be filed 

on a Michigan Tax Tribunal for or a form approved by the Michigan Tax Tribunal. Michigan Tax Tribunal forms are available at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

3. CLASSIFICATION 

Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below. 

[J] 

Denied 

[] 

Classification Changed From: 

401 

To; 

Record of Vote - Board or three member committee of board. 

Chairperson: 

[1 ves 

[0 

NO—fmms~ 

Member: 

[] Yes 

[7] 

NO mas 

Member: 

[1 ves 

[1] noms

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

01._Property_Tax_Appeal_Petition_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.9222e4b4-c6a5-4247-9363-0e1a4170a46a.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax 

disputes.

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Individual 

First Name

Alex

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

Lentz

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

22604 Chapoton

City or Town

St. Clair Shores

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48080

Telephone Number

3138204050

Fax Number

E-mail Address

dpx@dpx313.mygbiz.com

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

William

M.I.

E

Last Name

Semaan

Firm Name (if any)

Semaan Law PLLC

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

51 W Hancock

Suite 407

City or Town

Detroit

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48201

Telephone Number

313-263-7771

Fax Number

E-mail Address 

william@semaanlaw.com

Section 3: Subject Property Information

How many parcels are you appealing?

1

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

 *If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

28800 Halsted

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Farmington Hills

Michigan

48331

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Farmington Hills (OAKLAND)

County 

Oakland

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Value

 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal

Petitioner contends that the current assessments remain excessive and do not accurately reflect the subject property’s true cash value as of tax day, December 31, 

2024.

In support of the appeal, Petitioner relies on an appraisal by a certified general real estate appraiser concluding that the subject property had a true cash value of 

$315,000 as of December 31, 2024, and was in “poor condition,” requiring “an extreme amount of maintenance,” with portions deemed “dangerous” and structurally 

unsound. (See attached Appraisal).

After taking possession of the property, Petitioner discovered additional latent defects that further impair the property’s value and utility, including: (a) two 

inoperative residential heating oil tanks attached to the home, which required removal; (b) a dilapidated rear-yard shed, which must be demolished; (c) zonolite 

vermiculite insulation in the attic, a hazardous material requiring costly abatement; and (d) a major pipe break located beneath the garage that is causing water 

intrusion into the home and will require significant repair.

The subject property’s condition and the presence of these newly discovered defects materially reduce its market value beyond what was accounted for by the Board 

of Review.

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues

Year(s) you are appealing:

2025

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND upload the BOR decision: March

If No, check the applicable reason(s):

Did you request a Poverty Exemption at the BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR considered your application AND upload the BOR decision: 

 March  July  December

If No, explain why:

Section 7: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number: 22-23-08-100-122 

Classification of Property:

Real

Residential

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

167770

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

167770

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

250000 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

125000

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

125000

Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep’t of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal*

Parcel Identification Number:

 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:

What do you believe is the property’s classification?

If improved property, how is the property currently being used?

If improved property, for what use was the property designed?

Fee Information

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition?

No

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption?

No

If you answered yes to either or both of these questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees.

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is:

$100,000.00 and under $125.00

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00

$Over $500,000.00 $300.00

If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee

Page 4

STATE OF

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.