Record Finder / 25-003032-TT
Michigan
360 N Mlk LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Pontiac, Respondent
- Petitioner
- 360 N Mlk LLC
- Respondent
- City Of Pontiac
Case overview
- Docket number
- 25-003032-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Oakland
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | Consent Judgment | Not recorded | 11 | 03/12/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 12 | Granted | Not recorded | 11 | 03/12/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 11 | Amended Stipulation | Not recorded | Not recorded | 03/05/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 10 | Order Denying Motion | Not recorded | Not recorded | 02/24/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | A Stipulation has been received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 02/13/2026 | $50.00 | Download |
| 8 | Prehearing General Call | Not recorded | Not recorded | 11/17/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/17/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | ET Case Info Sheet | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/17/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Proof of service of petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 08/26/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Appearance | RESP | Not recorded | 08/28/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 07/31/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/31/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/27/2025 | $500.00 | Download |
Documents
25-003032 Consent Judgment.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 360 N MLK LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-003032 City of Pontiac, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the Stipulation and finds that it comports with the mandates of State law.1 As a result, the Tribunal shall enter the parties’ Stipulation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all attachments, terms, and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise indicated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2020, through June 30, 2022, at the rate of 4.25%, (ii) after June 30, 2022, through December 31, 2022, at the rate of 4.27%, (iii) after December 31, 2022, through June 30, 2023, at the rate of 5.65%, (iv) after June 30, 2023, through December 31, 2023, at the rate of 8.25%, (v) after December 31, 2023, 1 See MCL 211.27a. 2 See MCL 205.755.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-003032 Page 2 of 2 through June 30, 2024, at the rate of 9.30%, (vi) after June 30, 2024, through December 31, 2024, at the rate of 9.50%, (vii) after December 31, 2024, through June 30, 2025, at the rate of 9.47%, (viii) after June 30, 2025, through December 31, 2025, at the rate of 8.66%, and (ix) after December 31, 2025, through June 30, 2026, at a rate of 8.48%. This Consent Judgment resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. See docket look up for a copy of stipulation and for any possible refund paragraph. By _____________________________ Entered: March 12, 2026 gc PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
25-003032.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
- fo ¢305, STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ORLENE HAWKS GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR 360 N MLK LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ! Petitioner, i v MOAHMR Docket No. 25-003032 City of Pontiac , Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT (VALUATION) 1. The subject property is in Oakland County. 2. Parcel Number: Multiple - attached . (if more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 3. The values for the property identified above as estabilshed by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax year Assessed Value (AV) | Taxable Value (TV) 2025 attached muitl 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax year True Cash Value AV Tv 2025 attached multi 5. If the stipulated TV does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable inflation rate multiplier, explain why (e.g., transfer of ownership, additions, losses, omitted property etc.)
Page 2
MOAHR Docket No. 25-003032
Page 2 of 2
of fia refund the waiver of interest, etc. isach additional page if f nogesaan)
i
to Polter
Law,
260
W
Big
Beaver Ste L100,
Troy,
Mi Lar
Petitioner agrees to waive all interest relative to any refund herein.
NOTE: The Stipulation MUST include ALL parcels and ALL tax years included in the
appeal (including subsequent tax years on or after April 1 of each year for appeals
pending in the Small Claims Division). The parties may agree, however, to withdraw the
appeal of specific parcels and/or tax year(s).
IF APPLICABLE, complete the following section(s). Otherwise, LEAVE BLANK.
7.
The parties agree to the withdrawal of parcel number:
(If more than one parcel is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing
all other parcels being withdrawn.)
8. Thep ties agree to the withdrawal of tax year(s)
Pil
OO
Printed Name: Stephen Polter
Date:
Signature of Respondent's
authorized eT
blur
why WM Srnedt
2)
vo
{ PL25l1)
Printed
Name: Elizabeth White McDonnell
Terry Schultz (Oakland County Equalization Chief)
ooo
33)26
EET -Page 3
GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR 380 NMLK LLC , Petitioner, v City of Ponttac , Respondent. STATE OF MICHIGAN LANSING DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MOAHR Docket No. 26-003032 PROPERTY STIPULATION —~ MULTIPLE PARCEL FORM! _ OF1__ (To be attached to a completed Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment.) 1. The values for the property identified herein as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year | Parcel Number Assessed Value | Taxable Value 2025 64-14-21-482-002 29,670 27,300 2025 64-14-21-482-006 45,070 41,460 2025 64-14-28-229-001 28,120 25,900 2025 64-14-28-229-006 431,530 429,450 2025 64-14-28-229-007 25,30 23,390 2. The values for the property identified herein as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax Year | Parcel Number True Cash Value | Assessed Value | Taxable Value 2025 64-14-21-482-002 47,700 23,8650 23,850 2025 64-14-21-482-006 72,464 36,232 36,232 2025 64-14-28-229-001 45,208 22,604 22,604 2025 64-14-28-229-006 693,804 346,902 346,902 2025 64-14-28-229-007 40,824 20,412 20,412
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR 360 N MLK LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-003032 City Of Pontiac, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on February 13, 2026, and finds that under TTR 253, a stipulation must be signed by all parties, if the parties are not represented, or their attorneys or authorized representatives. The instant stipulation has not been agreed to and signed by Respondent's authorized representative. Furthermore, the parties have stipulated to true cash value for Parcel Numbers 64-14- 21-482-002, 64-14-28-229-001, 64-14-28-229-006, and 64-14-28-229-007 that does not appear to be in compliance with MCL 211.27a(1), which states that "property shall be assessed at 50% of its true cash value . . . ." Id. See also MCL 205.737. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall remain on the previously-scheduled Prehearing General Call and a Prehearing
Page 5
PT | "
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
25-003032.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
- fo ¢305, STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ORLENE HAWKS GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR 360 N MLK LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ! Petitioner, i v MOAHMR Docket No. 25-003032 City of Pontiac , Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT (VALUATION) 1. The subject property is in Oakland County. 2. Parcel Number: Multiple - attached . (if more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 3. The values for the property identified above as estabilshed by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax year Assessed Value (AV) | Taxable Value (TV) 2025 attached muitl 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax year True Cash Value AV Tv 2025 attached multi 5. If the stipulated TV does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable inflation rate multiplier, explain why (e.g., transfer of ownership, additions, losses, omitted property etc.)
Page 2
MOAHR Docket No. 25-003032
Page 2 of 2
of fia refund the waiver of interest, etc. isach additional page if f nogesaan)
i
to Polter
Law,
260
W
Big
Beaver Ste L100,
Troy,
Mi Lar
Petitioner agrees to waive all interest relative to any refund herein.
NOTE: The Stipulation MUST include ALL parcels and ALL tax years included in the
appeal (including subsequent tax years on or after April 1 of each year for appeals
pending in the Small Claims Division). The parties may agree, however, to withdraw the
appeal of specific parcels and/or tax year(s).
IF APPLICABLE, complete the following section(s). Otherwise, LEAVE BLANK.
7.
The parties agree to the withdrawal of parcel number:
(If more than one parcel is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing
all other parcels being withdrawn.)
8. Thep ties agree to the withdrawal of tax year(s)
Pil
OO
Printed Name: Stephen Polter
Date:
Signature of Respondent's
authorized eT
blur
why WM Srnedt
2)
vo
{ PL25l1)
Printed
Name: Elizabeth White McDonnell
Terry Schultz (Oakland County Equalization Chief)
ooo
33)26
EET -Page 3
GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR 380 NMLK LLC , Petitioner, v City of Ponttac , Respondent. STATE OF MICHIGAN LANSING DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MOAHR Docket No. 26-003032 PROPERTY STIPULATION —~ MULTIPLE PARCEL FORM! _ OF1__ (To be attached to a completed Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment.) 1. The values for the property identified herein as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year | Parcel Number Assessed Value | Taxable Value 2025 64-14-21-482-002 29,670 27,300 2025 64-14-21-482-006 45,070 41,460 2025 64-14-28-229-001 28,120 25,900 2025 64-14-28-229-006 431,530 429,450 2025 64-14-28-229-007 25,30 23,390 2. The values for the property identified herein as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax Year | Parcel Number True Cash Value | Assessed Value | Taxable Value 2025 64-14-21-482-002 47,700 23,8650 23,850 2025 64-14-21-482-006 72,464 36,232 36,232 2025 64-14-28-229-001 45,208 22,604 22,604 2025 64-14-28-229-006 693,804 346,902 346,902 2025 64-14-28-229-007 40,824 20,412 20,412
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR 360 N MLK LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-003032 City Of Pontiac, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on February 13, 2026, and finds that under TTR 253, a stipulation must be signed by all parties, if the parties are not represented, or their attorneys or authorized representatives. The instant stipulation has not been agreed to and signed by Respondent's authorized representative. Furthermore, the parties have stipulated to true cash value for Parcel Numbers 64-14- 21-482-002, 64-14-28-229-001, 64-14-28-229-006, and 64-14-28-229-007 that does not appear to be in compliance with MCL 211.27a(1), which states that "property shall be assessed at 50% of its true cash value . . . ." Id. See also MCL 205.737. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall remain on the previously-scheduled Prehearing General Call and a Prehearing
Page 5
PT | "
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Deny_Stip-Halm.2026-02-24_10-10-06.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 360 N MLK LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-003032 City Of Pontiac, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on February 13, 2026, and finds that under TTR 253, a stipulation must be signed by all parties, if the parties are not represented, or their attorneys or authorized representatives. The instant stipulation has not been agreed to and signed by Respondent’s authorized representative. Furthermore, the parties have stipulated to true cash value for Parcel Numbers 64-14- 21-482-002, 64-14-28-229-001, 64-14-28-229-006, and 64-14-28-229-007 that does not appear to be in compliance with MCL 211.27a(1), which states that "property shall be assessed at 50% of its true cash value . . . ." Id. See also MCL 205.737. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall remain on the previously-scheduled Prehearing General Call and a Prehearing Conference will be scheduled accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this order, no additional filing fee is required. By _____________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: February 24, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-003032 Page 2 of 6 or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 360 N MLK LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-003032 City Of Pontiac, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on February 13, 2026, and finds that under TTR 253, a stipulation must be signed by all parties, if the parties are not represented, or their attorneys or authorized representatives. The instant stipulation has not been agreed to and signed by Respondent’s authorized representative. Furthermore, the parties have stipulated to true cash value for Parcel Numbers 64-14- 21-482-002, 64-14-28-229-001, 64-14-28-229-006, and 64-14-28-229-007 that does not appear to be in compliance with MCL 211.27a(1), which states that "property shall be assessed at 50% of its true cash value . . . ." Id. See also MCL 205.737. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall remain on the previously-scheduled Prehearing General Call and a Prehearing Conference will be scheduled accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this order, no additional filing fee is required. By _____________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: February 24, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 25-003032 Page 4 of 6 or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232,
Page 6
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
25-003032.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED FEB 19 2026 2, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL pare STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ORLENE HAWKS GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR 360 N MLK LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MOAHR Docket No, 25-003032 City of Pontiac , Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT (VALUATION) 1. The subject property is in Oakland County. 2. Parcel Number: Multiple - attached (If more than one parcel is at Issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax year Assessed Value (AV) | Taxable Value (TV) 2025 attached multi 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax year True Cash Value AV TV 5. If the stipulated TV does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable inflation rate multiplier, explain why (e.g., transfer of ownership, additions, losses, omitted property etc.)
Page 2
MOAHR Docket No. 26-003032 Page 2 of 2 of the refund, the walver of interest, etc. (attach addtional page if necessary): malad to Polter Law 2600 Ww Big Beaver r Ste L1 00, Troy, Mi 48084, Petitioner agrees to walve all interest relative to any refund herein. NOTE: The Stipulation MUST include ALL parcels and ALL tax years included in the appeal (including subsequent tax years on or after April 1 of each year for appeals pending in the Small Claims Division). The parties may agree, however, to withdraw the appeal of specific parcels and/or tax year(s). IF APPLICABLE, complete the following section(s). Otherwise, LEAVE BLANK. 7. The parties agree to the withdrawal of parcel number: (If more than one parcel Is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing all other parcels being withdrawn.) 8. The parties agree to the withdrawal of tax year(s) Si Jour of Petitioner's Authorized epresentative or, if none, Petitioner: / => f— Printed Name: Stephen Polter Date: Feb 10, 2026 Signature gf Respondents authorized representative: [ns Dold Printed Name: Terry Schultz - Oakland County Equalization, Chief Date: Feb 10, 2026
Page 3
T05 sp - (HOBO abvvelats STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR 360 NMLK LLG , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No, 25-003032 City of Pontiac , Respondent(s) PROPERTY STIPULATION — MULTIPLE PARCEL FORM1__ OF1__ (To be attached to a completed Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment.) 1. The values for the property identified herein as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year | Parcel Number Assessed Value | Taxable Value 2025 64-14-21-482-002 29,670 27,300 2025 64-14-21-482-006 45,070 41,460 2025 64-14-28-229-001 28,120 25,900 2025 64-14-28-229-006 431,530 429,450 2025 64-14-28-229-007 25,390 23,390 2. The values for the property identified herein as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax Year | Parcel Number True Cash Value | Assessed Value | Taxable Value 2026 64-14-21-482-002 47,703 23,851 23,861 2025 64-14-21-482-006 72,462 36,231 36,231 2025 64-14-28-229-001 45,211 22,605 22,605 2025 64-14-28-229-006 693,803 346,902 346,902 2025 64-14-28-229-007 40,821 20,411 20,411
Page 4
[ POLTER LAW GROUP 2600 W. BIG BEAVER, SUITE L100 | TROY, MI 48084 ee pe EX pT men A i 13 FERS 3 US i a 0 cr Co
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Prehearing_General_Call.2025-11-17_09-27-07.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF OCTOBER 16 - 30, 2026 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF PROCEDURE 360 N MLK LLC, Petitioner, v City Of Pontiac, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 25-003032 Please be advised that 25-003032 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General Call commencing October 16, 2026. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be notified at least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not necessarily occur in the order in which the cases are listed below. Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241. Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order will be published. In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of the Tribunal’s website. Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s website for more information.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-003032 Page 2 of 3 IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall: a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.). b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures by June 22, 2026. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing Statements by June 22, 2026. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in holding a party or parties in default. See TTR 237. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on June 22, 2026, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on October 16, 2026, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is
Page 3
MTT
Page 4
STA
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
25003032 Pontiac Answer - 360 N MLK LLC.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
CLARKHILL\18836\1009929\283432754.v1-9/17/25 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MTT Docket No. 25-003032 Parcel Nos. 64-14-21-482-002 64-14-21-482-006 64-14-28-229-001 64-14-28-229-006 64-14-28-229-007 360 N MLK LLC, Petitioner, v CITY OF PONTIAC, Respondent. / Stephen Polter POLTER LAW Attorney for Petitioner 2600 W Big Beaver, Suite L100 Troy, MI 48084 (248) 213-6800 spolter@polterlaw.com Elizabeth White McDonnell (P62561) Sean P. Fitzgerald (P60654) CLARK HILL PLC Attorneys for Respondent 200 Ottawa Avenue NW, Suite 500 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 (616) 608-1131 ewhitemcdonnell@clarkhill.com sfitzgerald@clarkhill.com / RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION Respondent, City of Pontiac, by and through its attorneys, Clark Hill PLC, hereby answers the Petition filed by Petitioner, 360 N MLK LLC, and states as follows: 1. Respondent lacks the knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 1 of the Petition. 2. Respondent admits the allegations in paragraph 2 of the Petition. 3. Respondent lacks the knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 3 of the Petition.
Page 2
2 CLARKHILL\18836\1009929\283432754.v1-9/17/25 4. Respondent lacks the knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 4 of the Petition. 5. Respondent lacks the knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 5 of the Petition. 6. Respondent admits the allegations in paragraph 6 of the Petition. 7. Respondent lacks the knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 7 of the Petition. 8. Respondent lacks the knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 8 of the Petition. 9. Respondent lacks the knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 9 of the Petition. 10. Respondent denies the allegations in paragraph 10 of the Petition as untrue. 11. Respondent admits the allegations in paragraph 11 of the Petition. 12. Respondent lacks the knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 12 of the Petition. 13. Respondent lacks the knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 13 of the Petition. 14. Respondent lacks the knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 14 of the Petition. 15. Respondent lacks the knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 15 of the Petition. 16. Respondent admits the allegations in paragraph 16 of the Petition.
Page 3
3 CLARKHILL\18836\1009929\283432754.v1-9/17/25 17. Respondent lacks the knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 17 of the Petition. 18. Respondent lacks the knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 18 of the Petition. 19. Respondent denies the allegations in paragraph 19 of the Petition as untrue. 20. Respondent denies the allegations in paragraph 20 of the Petition as untrue. WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfully requests that the Tribunal dismiss the Petition, sustain the assessed, taxable and true cash values with respect to the property as established by Respondent, award the costs and fees, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by Respondents in the defense of this matter, and grant such other and further relief as the Tribunal deems just and proper. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PETITIONER’S PETITION NOW COMES Respondent, City of Pontiac, by and through its attorneys, Clark Hill PLC, and hereby offers the following Affirmative Defenses to Petitioner’s Petition as follows: 1. Petitioner fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action against Respondent and to support its claim of relief. Dated: September 17, 2025 Respectfully submitted, CLARK HILL PLC By: Elizabeth White McDonnell (P62561) Sean P. Fitzgerald (P60654) Attorneys for Respondent
Page 4
4 CLARKHILL\18836\1009929\283432754.v1-9/17/25 2. Respondent has properly and lawfully classified Petitioner’s property and established its taxable and assessed value
Page 5
CL
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
10._Entire_Tribunal_Case_Information_Sheet_Must_Upload_Answer_.40dedc81-2111-414e-beaf-7c648690210e.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-003032 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City Of Pontiac (OAKLAND) Local Unit of Government/First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Elizabeth White M.I. Last Name McDonnell Firm Name (if any) Clark Hill PLC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 200 Ottawa Ave. NW Suite 500 City or Town Grand Rapids State Michigan ZIP Code 49503 Telephone Number 616-608-1131 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) ewhitemcdonnell@clarkhill.com Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Elizabeth White McDonnell /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
25-003032.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED AUG 2 6 2025 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Tigges” STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR 360 N MLK LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No.25-003032 City of Pontiac Respondent(s) PROOF OF SERVICE FOR PROPERTY TAX PETITION *To be filed after the Tribunal issues the Notice of Docket Number* Stephen Polter states that on August 21 he/she [Name of person serving/mailing petition] [date of service] served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter upon: [Provide name and address of the following entities] 1. Assessor (via certified mail): 250 Elizabeth Lake Rd #1000, Pontiac, MI 48341 2. City Clerk or Township Supervisor/Clerk (via certified mail): 47450 Woodward Ave, Pontiac, MI 48342 3. County Equalization Director (via first class mail or personal service): 250 Elizabeth Lake Rd # 1000W, Pontiac, MI 48341 4. County Clerk (via first class mail or personal service): 1200 N Telegraph Building #12E, Pontiac, MI 48341 5. Secretary of the local school board (via first class mail or personal service): 47200 Woodward Ave, Pontiac, MI 48342 6. State Treasurer (via first class mail):
Page 2
Te X EDTA RO : : EXPRESS PROPERTY TAX ARPEALS LL § USposToEM © A division of Polter Law Group 06350002268383 FROM 48084 is 2600 W Big Beaver | Ste L100 | Troy, MI'48084 ~ oe MTT OR 30232 Lows ing Mz 4304
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
25-003032.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
CLARKHILL\18836\1009929\283432752.v1-8/28/25 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ________________________________________________ MTT Docket No. 25-003032 Parcel Nos. 64-14-21-482-002 64-14-21-482-006 64-14-28-229-001 64-14-28-229-006 64-14-28-229-007 360 N MLK LLC, Petitioner, v CITY OF PONTIAC, Respondent. / Stephen Polter POLTER LAW Attorney for Petitioner 2600 W Big Beaver, Suite L100 Troy, MI 48084 (248) 213-6800 spolter@polterlaw.com Elizabeth White McDonnell (P62561) Sean P. Fitzgerald (P60654) CLARK HILL PLC Attorneys for Respondent 200 Ottawa Avenue NW, Suite 500 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 (616) 608-1131 ewhitemcdonnell@clarkhill.com sfitzgerald@clarkhill.com / APPEARANCE Clark Hill PLC hereby enters its Appearance on behalf of Respondent, City of Pontiac. Dated: August 28, 2025 Respectfully submitted, CLARK HILL PLC By: Elizabeth White McDonnell (P62561) Sean P. Fitzgerald (P60654) Attorneys for Respondent
Page 2
CLARKHILL\18836\1009929\283432753.v1-8/28/25 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ________________________________________________ MTT Docket No. 25-003032 Parcel Nos. 64-14-21-482-002 64-14-21-482-006 64-14-28-229-001 64-14-28-229-006 64-14-28-229-007 360 N MLK LLC, Petitioner, v CITY OF PONTIAC, Respondent. / Stephen Polter POLTER LAW Attorney for Petitioner 2600 W Big Beaver, Suite L100 Troy, MI 48084 (248) 213-6800 spolter@polterlaw.com Elizabeth White McDonnell (P62561) Sean P. Fitzgerald (P60654) CLARK HILL PLC Attorneys for Respondent 200 Ottawa Avenue NW, Suite 500 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 (616) 608-1131 ewhitemcdonnell@clarkhill.com sfitzgerald@clarkhill.com / PROOF OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that on the date below, a copy of an Appearance was served via electronic mail, upon: Stephen Polter spolter@polterlaw.com Date: August 28, 2025 /s/ Bailey Dettloff Bailey Dettloff
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
360 N MLK LLC.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED JUN 02 2025 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL §1ATE oF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR 360 N MLK LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No, City of Pontiac Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: Attached (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is x real ___ personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___ Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4, Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___ Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as 201Comm
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunals authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): The property or properties at issue are located in Oakland County. The property or properties’ address is: 360 N MLK BL Pontiac MI The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): Pontiac Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 614 Hempstead Gardens Dr WH, NY 11552 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): X the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes __ No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunals authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 attached 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): Reduction of TCV and accordingly AV/TV to more reflect these accurate figures based on comps, condition, income, vacancy, etc.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. Page 4 of 4 gnature of Petitigner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Printed Name df Pet fonér's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Stephen Polter Email Address: spolter@polterlaw.com Mailing Address: 2600 W Big Beaver, Ste L100, Troy, MI 48084 Telephone Number: 248-213-6800 Date: May 25, 2025
Page 5
5 iE; STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LESING DIRECTOR 360 N MLK LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, \% MTT Docket No. City of Pontiac i Respondent. MULTIPLE PARCEL ANSWERFORM 1 OF 1 __ 1. The classification of the property identified herein as established by Respondent's Board of Review is: Tax Year Parcel Number Real/Personal Classification 2025 64-14-21-482-002 R 201Comm 2025 64-14-21-482-006 R 201Comm 2025 64-14-28-229-001 R 201Comm 2025 64-14-28-229-006 R 201Comm 2025 64-14-28-229-007 R 201Comm 2. The values for the property identified herein as established by
Page 6
MTT
Page 7
May
Page 8
X
Page 9
J
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2025-07-31_15-08-54.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 360 N MLK LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 25-003032 City Of Pontiac, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: __Tribunal Clerk________ Entered: July 31, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
360 N MLK LLC.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED JUN 02 2025 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL §1ATE oF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR 360 N MLK LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No, City of Pontiac Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: Attached (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is x real ___ personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___ Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4, Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___ Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as 201Comm
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunals authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): The property or properties at issue are located in Oakland County. The property or properties’ address is: 360 N MLK BL Pontiac MI The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): Pontiac Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 614 Hempstead Gardens Dr WH, NY 11552 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): X the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes __ No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunals authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 attached 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): Reduction of TCV and accordingly AV/TV to more reflect these accurate figures based on comps, condition, income, vacancy, etc.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. Page 4 of 4 gnature of Petitigner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Printed Name df Pet fonér's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Stephen Polter Email Address: spolter@polterlaw.com Mailing Address: 2600 W Big Beaver, Ste L100, Troy, MI 48084 Telephone Number: 248-213-6800 Date: May 25, 2025
Page 5
5 iE; STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LESING DIRECTOR 360 N MLK LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, \% MTT Docket No. City of Pontiac i Respondent. MULTIPLE PARCEL ANSWERFORM 1 OF 1 __ 1. The classification of the property identified herein as established by Respondent's Board of Review is: Tax Year Parcel Number Real/Personal Classification 2025 64-14-21-482-002 R 201Comm 2025 64-14-21-482-006 R 201Comm 2025 64-14-28-229-001 R 201Comm 2025 64-14-28-229-006 R 201Comm 2025 64-14-28-229-007 R 201Comm 2. The values for the property identified herein as established by
Page 6
MTT
Page 7
May
Page 8
X
Page 9
J
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.