25-003032.pdf
360 N Mlk LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Pontiac, Respondent · 25-003032-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
- fo ¢305, STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ORLENE HAWKS GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR 360 N MLK LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ! Petitioner, i v MOAHMR Docket No. 25-003032 City of Pontiac , Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT (VALUATION) 1. The subject property is in Oakland County. 2. Parcel Number: Multiple - attached . (if more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 3. The values for the property identified above as estabilshed by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax year Assessed Value (AV) | Taxable Value (TV) 2025 attached muitl 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax year True Cash Value AV Tv 2025 attached multi 5. If the stipulated TV does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable inflation rate multiplier, explain why (e.g., transfer of ownership, additions, losses, omitted property etc.)
Page 2
MOAHR Docket No. 25-003032
Page 2 of 2
of fia refund the waiver of interest, etc. isach additional page if f nogesaan)
i
to Polter
Law,
260
W
Big
Beaver Ste L100,
Troy,
Mi Lar
Petitioner agrees to waive all interest relative to any refund herein.
NOTE: The Stipulation MUST include ALL parcels and ALL tax years included in the
appeal (including subsequent tax years on or after April 1 of each year for appeals
pending in the Small Claims Division). The parties may agree, however, to withdraw the
appeal of specific parcels and/or tax year(s).
IF APPLICABLE, complete the following section(s). Otherwise, LEAVE BLANK.
7.
The parties agree to the withdrawal of parcel number:
(If more than one parcel is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing
all other parcels being withdrawn.)
8. Thep ties agree to the withdrawal of tax year(s)
Pil
OO
Printed Name: Stephen Polter
Date:
Signature of Respondent's
authorized eT
blur
why WM Srnedt
2)
vo
{ PL25l1)
Printed
Name: Elizabeth White McDonnell
Terry Schultz (Oakland County Equalization Chief)
ooo
33)26
EET -Page 3
GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR 380 NMLK LLC , Petitioner, v City of Ponttac , Respondent. STATE OF MICHIGAN LANSING DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MOAHR Docket No. 26-003032 PROPERTY STIPULATION —~ MULTIPLE PARCEL FORM! _ OF1__ (To be attached to a completed Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment.) 1. The values for the property identified herein as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year | Parcel Number Assessed Value | Taxable Value 2025 64-14-21-482-002 29,670 27,300 2025 64-14-21-482-006 45,070 41,460 2025 64-14-28-229-001 28,120 25,900 2025 64-14-28-229-006 431,530 429,450 2025 64-14-28-229-007 25,30 23,390 2. The values for the property identified herein as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax Year | Parcel Number True Cash Value | Assessed Value | Taxable Value 2025 64-14-21-482-002 47,700 23,8650 23,850 2025 64-14-21-482-006 72,464 36,232 36,232 2025 64-14-28-229-001 45,208 22,604 22,604 2025 64-14-28-229-006 693,804 346,902 346,902 2025 64-14-28-229-007 40,824 20,412 20,412
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR 360 N MLK LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-003032 City Of Pontiac, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on February 13, 2026, and finds that under TTR 253, a stipulation must be signed by all parties, if the parties are not represented, or their attorneys or authorized representatives. The instant stipulation has not been agreed to and signed by Respondent's authorized representative. Furthermore, the parties have stipulated to true cash value for Parcel Numbers 64-14- 21-482-002, 64-14-28-229-001, 64-14-28-229-006, and 64-14-28-229-007 that does not appear to be in compliance with MCL 211.27a(1), which states that "property shall be assessed at 50% of its true cash value . . . ." Id. See also MCL 205.737. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall remain on the previously-scheduled Prehearing General Call and a Prehearing Conference will be scheduled accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this order, no additional filing fee is required. - By alice Hat. Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair
Page 5
PT | " " Ce ee 50.740 4 » US POSTAGE IMI + | E VA 5 MAR 2026 PM 14 |. F i § oeilialsiass EXPRESS PROPERTY TAX APPEALS LLC i FROM 48084 A division of Polter Law Group F—— E: 2600 W Big Beaver | Ste L100 Troy, MI 48084 920¢ 01 ¥vW peAleoaY ons ™NA MT Ht £4 ad | Told 2232 ltd Bb peggy hy pel phe