360 N MLK LLC.pdf

360 N Mlk LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Pontiac, Respondent · 25-003032-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

RECEIVED 

JUN 02 2025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 §1ATE oF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

360 

N MLK LLC 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No, 

City of Pontiac 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No: Attached 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

The property identified above is x 

real ___ personal. 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? ___ Yes ___ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- 

contiguous parcel.) 

4, 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? ___ Yes ___ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as 201Comm

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

8. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunals authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

The property or properties at issue are located in Oakland 

County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

360 N MLK BL 

Pontiac MI 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): Pontiac 

Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 

614 Hempstead Gardens Dr 

WH, NY 11552 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

X 

the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes __ No 

uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment

MTT Docket No. 

Page 3 of 4 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunals authority over the prior 

tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

attached 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

Reduction of TCV and accordingly AV/TV to more reflect these accurate figures 

based on comps, condition, income, vacancy, etc.

MTT Docket No. 

Page 4 of 4 

gnature of Petitigner’s 

Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Printed Name df Pet fonér's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Stephen Polter 

Email Address: spolter@polterlaw.com 

Mailing Address: 

2600 W Big Beaver, Ste L100, Troy, MI 48084 

Telephone Number: 248-213-6800 

Date: May 25, 2025

5 

iE; 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LESING 

DIRECTOR 

360 N MLK LLC 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner, 

\% 

MTT Docket No. 

City of Pontiac 

i 

Respondent. 

MULTIPLE PARCEL ANSWERFORM 1 

OF 1 __ 

1. 

The classification of the property identified herein as established by 

Respondent's Board of Review is: 

Tax Year 

Parcel Number 

Real/Personal 

Classification 

2025 

64-14-21-482-002 

R 

201Comm 

2025 

64-14-21-482-006 

R 

201Comm 

2025 

64-14-28-229-001 

R 

201Comm 

2025 

64-14-28-229-006 

R 

201Comm 

2025 

64-14-28-229-007 

R 

201Comm 

2. 

The values for the property identified herein as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

| Parcel Number 

| True Cash Value 

| Assessed Value 

| Taxable Value 

2025 

64-14-21-482-002 

59,340 

29,670 

27,300 

2025 

64-14-21-482-006 

90,140 

45,070 

41,460 

2025 

64-14-28-229-001 

56,240 

28,120 

25,900 

2025 

64-14-28-229-006 

863,060 

431,530 

429,450

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 2 

3. 

Respondent contends that the values for the property identified herein are: 

Tax Year | Parcel Number | True Cash Value | State Equalized Value 

| Taxable Value 

2025 

64-14-21-482-002 

[35,000 

17,500 

17,500 

2025 

64-14-21-482-006 

[50,000 

25,000 

20,000 

2025 

64-14-28-229-001 

[35,000 

17,500 

17,500 

2025 

64-14-28-229-006 

[500,000 

250,000 

250,000 

2025 

64-14-28-229-007 

[30,000 

15,000 

15,000 

4. 

The values in dispute for the property identified herein are: 

Tax Year | Parcel Number | True Cash Value | State Equalized Value | Taxable Value 

2025 

64-14-21-482-002 

[24,340 

12,170 

9,800 

2025 

64-14-21-482-006 

(40,140 

20,070 

21,460 

2025 

64-14-28-229-001 

[21,240 

10,620 

8,400 

2025 

64-14-28-229-006 

[363,060 

181,530 

179,450 

2025 

64-14-28-229-007 

[20,780 

10,390 

8,390

May 27, 2025 

RECEIVED 

MAY 80 2025 

f= [= 

I FAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

EXPRESS PROPERTY TAX APPEALS LLL 

A division of Polter Law Group 

2nd Floor Michigan Tax Tribunal 

2407 N. Grand River Avenue 

Lansing, Michigan 48906 

Re: 

Multiple 2025 PTA 

To whom it may concern, 

This mailing contains sixty-thtee (“63”) commercial propetty tax appeals/petitions and one 

(“1”) multi (2) contiguous tesidential appeal/petition, along with the requisite filing fees, as follows: 

SXM LLC v Hadley Twp. (multi — 2) Res., along with 2 checks (#1345-46) for 

$125 ea. 

CCCU v Muskegon /Fruitpott, along with 2 checks; one (#1320) for $250, one 

(#1393) for $150 (totaling $400). 

CCCU v Commerce Twp., along with 2 checks; one (#1321) for $250, one (#1391) 

for $150 (totaling $400). 

CCCU v Notton Shores, along with 1 check (#1319) in the amount of $250. 

TOCU v Sandusky, along with 1 check (#1317) in the amount of $250. 

TOCU v Owosso, along with 1 check (#1318) in the amount of $250. 

W Investors v FH, along with 1 check (#1378) in the amount of $400. 

Rite Aid Corp (Lewis) v Pinckney, along with 1 check (#1336) in the amount of 

$400. 

Warten Manor v Warten, along with 2 checks; one (#1311) for $600, one (#1390) 

for $25 (totaling $625 — contiguous multi (2)). 

2Changs v N'Ville, along with 2 checks; one (#1350) for $250, one (#1389) for 

$150 (totaling $400). 

5016 Greenfield v Richfield, along with 1 check (#1330) in the amount of $250. 

Springfield v. Hampton, along with 1 check (#1331) in the amount of $400. 

Westbelt v Clawson, along with 1 check (#1337) in the amount of $400. 

CVS (Encote) v Detroit, along with 1 check (#1316) in the amount of $250. 

10 Middlebelt v FH, along with 1 check (#1375) in the amount of $250.

X Holdings v Warren, along with 1 check (#1329) in the amount of $400. 

Prism v Mt Pleasant, along with 1 check (#1326) in the amount of $250. 

Mishpat v Sfld., along with 2 checks; one (#1348) for $250, one (#1388) for $150 

(totaling $400). 

Greenfield Manor v Detroit, along with 1 check (#1369) in the amount of $400. 

Prep v Grand Haven, along with 1 check (#1349) in the amount of $400. 

Impulso v OP, along with 1 check (1338) in the amount of $400. 

Impulso v Clarkston/Independence Twp., along with 

1 check (#1340) in the 

amount of $400. 

Impulso v Pennfield, along with 2 checks; one (#1339) for $250, one (#1387) for 

$150 (totaling $400). 

Fatmington 9 v Farmington, along with 1 check (#1333) in the amount of $400. 

HWEFDS v LP, along with 1 check (#1334) in the amount of $400. 

Main 5% v RO, along with 1 check (#1332) in the amount of $400. 

Messersmith v Okemos, along with 1 check (#1335) in the amount of $400. 

RAD v VBT, along with 1 check (#1314) in the amount of $400. 

St Helen v. Chatlevoix, along with 2 checks; one (#1315) for $250, one (#1386) 

for $150 (totaling $400). 

Dutand RAD v Durand, along with 1 check (#1313) in the amount of $400. 

360 N MLK v Pontiac, along with 2 checks; one (#1312) for $400, one (#1396) 

for $100 (contiguous — multi (5)). 

Schaefer v Sfld., along with 1 check (#1365) in the amount of $400. 

26382 v Inkster, along with 1 check (#1310) in the amount of $400. 

29200 v Livonia, along with 1 check (#1308) in the amount of $400. 

20030 Taylor v Taylor, along with 1 check (#1309) in the amount of $400. 

222 Reed v Reed City, along with 1 check (#1307) in the amount of $250. 

WMG v 

Flint, along with 2 checks; one (#1347) for $250, one (#1385) for $150 

(totaling $400). 

13 York v Novi, along with 1 check (#1364) in the amount of $400. 

Kenwood v RO, along with 2 checks; one (#1341) for $250, one (#1384) for $150 

(totaling $400). 

Farmer v Detroit, along with 1 check (#1342) in the amount of $400. 

Rivershell v Lansing, along with 2 checks; one (#1363) for $600, one (#1383) for 

$25 (totaling $625) (contiguous — multi (2)). 

ID Pallister v Detroit, along with 1 check (#1366) in the amount of $600. 

ID Cap v Detroit, along with 2 checks; one (#1367) for $600, one (#1394) for $25

JRV v Livonia., along with 1 check (#1325) in the amount of $400. 

Dhal RE v $fld., along with 2 checks; one (#1324) for $400, one (#1381) for $200 

(totaling $600). 

NWH v Lansing, along with 2 checks; one (#1351) for $250, one (#1380) for $150 

(totaling $400). 

Berkley Venture v Berkley, along with 1 check (#1361) in the amount of $400. 

FHH v FH, along with 1 check (#1357) in the amount of $250. 

Northstar v Chesterfield, along with 1 check (#1353) in the amount of $250. 

Fenton v BC, along with 1 check (#1356) in the amount of $400. 

NWH v FH, along with 1 check (#1352) in the amount of $400. 

Global v Roseville, along with 1 check (#1358) in the amount of $400. 

Garfield Venture v CT, along with 1 check (#1360) in the amount of $600. 

Global v Shelby, along with 1 check (#1355) in the amount of $400. 

Intl Prop v Macomb, along with 1 check (#1379) in the amount of $250. 

KB3 v Big Rapids, along with 1 check (#1397) in the amount of $400. 

Please file and issue/email docket numbers accordingly. 

President, EPTA 

CC (Letter only): 

Holy 

Stephen Poltet, JD, MBA 

SOM MTT

POLTER LAW GROUP 

2600 W. BIG BEAVER, SUITE L100 

| TROY, MI 48084 

=r 

- MTT 

ToR ZomRz 

Lons wg, MZ 45709 

Jit 

atg bb gdiilhlpin 

ih

← View full record