Michigan

Xhilda Beqiraj Petitioner V City Of Novi Respondent

Petitioner: Xhilda Beqiraj
Respondent: City Of Novi

Case overview

Docket number: 26-000414-TT
Status: Disposed
CaseType: SC Property
Division: Small Claims Division
County: Oakland
Judge: No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #	Subject	Filer	Line Ref	Enter Date/Post Mark	Fee	Related Item
9	Order of Dismissal	Not recorded	Not recorded	07/28/2026	Not recorded	Download
8	Order Extending P's Default	Not recorded	7	07/01/2026	Not recorded	Download
7	Corrected Order Holding Petitioner in Default	Not recorded	4	06/09/2026	Not recorded	Download
6	Notice of Filing	Not recorded	Not recorded	06/09/2026	Not recorded	Download
5	Answer was received	RESP	Not recorded	05/19/2026	Not recorded	Download
Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Download
Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Download
4	Order of Default of Petitioner	Not recorded	Not recorded	05/14/2026	Not recorded	Download
3	Petition has been verified	Not recorded	1	05/14/2026	Not recorded	Download
2	Notice of Docket Number SC	Not recorded	Not recorded	05/14/2026	Not recorded	Download
1	A petition was received.	Not recorded	Not recorded	03/28/2026	Not recorded	Download

Documents

26-000414 Dismiss (post-default).pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Xhilda Beqiraj,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Petitioner,

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

MTT Docket No. 26-000414

City of Novi,

Presiding Judge

Respondent.

Patricia L. Halm

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that it entered an order

holding Petitioner in default on June 9, 2026, because Petitioner failed to file a copy of

the notice giving rise to the appeal, i.e., March Board of Review decision. On July 1,

2026, the Tribunal extended the time for Petitioner to cure the default by an additional

14 days, and they have failed to respond. Petitioner has not complied with either order,

and the latter stated that “failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of

the case” and referenced Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury.1 In Grimm, the Michigan Court of

Appeals summarized factors that the Tribunal should consider before imposing the

sanction of dismissal. Those factors are:

(1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of

refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the

opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) the

degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) attempts to

cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better serve the

interests of justice.2

Here, Petitioner’s failure to comply with multiple orders has established a history of

deliberate delay. As a result, giving careful consideration to the factors involved and

considering all options in determining what sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal

finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser sanction would not be appropriate in

light of Petitioner’s history of noncompliance in this case.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED.

This order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case.

1 Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).

2 Id. at 149.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-000414

Page 2 of 2

APPEAL RIGHTS

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of

Appeals.

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless

the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a

principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the

decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and,

if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the

opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to

electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the

motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral

arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal.

Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the

claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If

the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal

by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the

record on appeal. There is no certification fee.

Entered: July 28, 2026

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

kac

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

26-00414 Extend Default NGR_.pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Xhilda Beqiraj,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Petitioner,

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

MTT Docket No. 26-000414

City of Novi,

Presiding Judge

Respondent.

Patricia L. Halm

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that it entered an order

holding Petitioner in default on June 9, 2026, because Petitioner failed to file a copy of

the notice giving rise to the appeal, i.e., March Board of Review (BOR) decision.1

Petitioner was required to cure the default by obtaining a copy of the BOR decision from

Respondent and submitting a copy of the decision to the Tribunal within 14 days.2

Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet has failed to respond or submit the

required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default

appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice

and Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify dismissal

of the case for failure to timely comply with this order.3

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the

default: (1) file a copy of the BOR decision, (2) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, and

(3) file proof the motion was served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with

the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order.4

1 The order further stated, “Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being

required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).”

2 A list of Tribunal rules can be found online at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib.

3 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).

4 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received.

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m.

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-000414 

Page 2 of 2 

 

Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of the case, as provided by 

TTR 237.5 

 

Entered: July 1, 2026 

 

 

 

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm 

kac 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

 

5 See also MCL 205.732.

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

26-000414 Corrected Default.pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Xhilda Beqiraj,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Petitioner,

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

MTT Docket No. 26-000414

City of Novi,

Presiding Judge

Respondent.

Patricia L. Halm

CORRECTED ORDER HOLDING PETITIONER IN DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that it issued an order holding

Petitioner in default on May 14, 2026. The Tribunal erred in the issuance of that order

as it failed to indicate why Petitioner was held in default. Consequently, the Tribunal

finds it necessary to issue a corrected order. Specifically, Petitioner failed to file a copy

of the notice giving rise to the appeal, i.e., March Board of Review (BOR) decision. As

such, the petition is not properly pending. Petitioner must obtain a copy of the BOR

decision from Respondent and submit a copy to the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry

of this order.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, by submitting

a copy of the March BOR decision within 14 days of the entry of this order.

Failure to comply with this order will result in Petitioner being required to file a motion to

set aside the default, with the appropriate filing fee.

Entered: June 9, 2026

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

kac

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC-Notice_of_Filing_of_Answer.2026-06-09_10-11-36.pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Xhilda Beqiraj,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

MTT Docket No. 26-000414

City Of Novi,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website.

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Users who file documents with the Michigan Tax Tribunal are advised that filed

documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tax

Docket Lookup. Users who file documents are responsible for ensuring sensitive or

personal identifying information is withheld or redacted. See TTR 209. If a user wishes

to file a document for consideration by the Michigan Tax Tribunal and prevent its

publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order

under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the

Order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order

will be published.

The responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from

all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and

their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or

screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A

party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may

request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously-filed document by

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-000414

Page 2 of 2

submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form will be

available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of our website.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an

appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan

Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan

Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal

settlement conference process.

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation.

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or

email taxtrib@michigan.gov.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: June 9, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Xhilda Beqiraj,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000414

City Of Novi,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims

Page 4

MTT

Page 5

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Valuation Statement.pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

Valuation Report

DB:

Novi City 2026

05/19/2026

09:10 AM

Est. TCV/Total Floor Area = 244.31, Most recent sale 10/15/2021 for 360,000

2026 Est. T.C.V. 50-22-11-102-021 = 451,479

 ECF (HOWELL'S WALLED LAKE SUB) 1.600 => TCV: 373,363

Notes: 

 Totals: 319,662 233,352

 Garbage Disposal 1 277 202 

 Dishwasher 1 824 602 

Built-Ins

 Public Sewer 1 1,581 1,154 

 Public Water 1 1,581 1,154 

Water/Sewer

 Common Wall: 1.5 Wall 1 -4,191 -3,059 

 Base Cost 462 22,250 16,242 

Class: C Exterior: Siding Foundation: 42 Inch (Unfinished)

Garages

 Treated Wood 182 4,044 2,952 

Deck

 WCP (1 Story) 52 3,622 2,644 

Porches

 Separate Shower 1 1,414 1,032 

 Extra Sink 1 988 721 

 2 Fixture Bath 1 3,234 2,361 

 3 Fixture Bath 1 4,833 3,528 

Plumbing

 Brick Veneer 160 2,861 2,089 

Exterior

 Recreation Room 681 13,940 10,176 

Other Additions/Adjustments

 Total: 262,404 191,554

1 Story Siding Overhang 108 

2 Story Siding Basement 766 

1 Story Siding Basement 208 

Stories Exterior Foundation Size Cost New Depr. Cost 

Building Areas

Phy/Ab.Phy/Func/Econ/Comb. % Good=73/100/100/100/73

Ground Area = 974 SF Floor Area = 1848 SF.

(11) Heating System: Forced Heat & Cool

 

Cost Est. for Res. Bldg: 1 Single Family TWO STORY B Cls C Blt 1999

 Total Estimated Land Improvements True Cash Value = 6,390

D/W/P: 3.5 Concrete 7.10 1200 75 6,390

Description Rate Size % Good Cash Value

Land Improvement Cost Estimates

 75 Actual Front Feet, 0.21 Total Acres Total Est. Land Value = 71,726

 75.00 122.00 0.9564 1.0000 1000 100 71,726

Description Frontage Depth Front Depth Rate %Adj. Reason Value

 * Factors *

Land Value Estimates for Land Table R1101.HOWELL'S WALLED LAKE SUB

Map #: CITY OF NOVI NOVI, MI 48377 

Property Class: 401 42931 THIRTEEN MILE RD 

50-22-11-102-021 2026 Est. T.C.V. BEQIRAJ, XHILDA

Page 2

Valuation Report

DB:

Novi City 2026

05/19/2026

09:10 AM

 225,740 225,740 225,740 198,880 198,880 198,880

2026 Assessed MBOR S.E.V. Capped ->Taxable<- PRE/MBT

 0 23,350 0 0 5,220 0

2026 New Eq. Adjustment Loss Additions Tax Adjustment Losses

 202,390 202,390 202,390 193,660 2.70

2025 Assessed MBOR S.E.V. Base for Cap IRM

Parcel Number: 50-22-11-102-021 Page: 2

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Record Card.pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

*** Information herein deemed reliable but not guaranteed***

OAKLAND

County:

CITY OF NOVI

Jurisdiction:

Printed on

Parcel Number:

50-22-11-102-021

178,900C

194,820

171,510

23,310

2023

187,840C

199,560

171,770

27,790

2024

193,660C

202,390

174,060

28,330

2025

198,880C

225,740M

225,740

189,880

35,860

2026

Taxable

Value

Tribunal/

Other

Board of

Review

Assessed

Value

Building

Value

Land

Value

Year

Land Improvement Cost Estimates

Description Rate Size % Good Cash Value

D/W/P: 3.5 Concrete 7.10 1200 75 6,390

 Total Estimated Land Improvements True Cash Value = 6,390

 * Factors *

Description Frontage Depth Front Depth Rate %Adj. Reason Value

 75.00 122.00 0.9564 1.0000 1000 100 71,726

 75 Actual Front Feet, 0.21 Total Acres Total Est. Land Value = 71,726

Land Value Estimates for Land Table R1101.HOWELL'S WALLED LAKE SUB

STF 05/09/2006 INSPECTED

JZ 05/25/2022 DESK TOP R

Who When What

Level

Rolling

Low

High

Landscaped

Swamp

Wooded

Pond

Waterfront

Ravine

Wetland

Flood Plain

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Topography of 

Site

Dirt Road

Gravel Road

Paved Road

Storm Sewer

Sidewalk

Water

Sewer

Electric

Gas

Curb

Street Lights

Standard Utilities

Underground Utils.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Public

Improvements

Vacant

 

Improved

X

The Equalizer. Copyright (c) 1999 - 2009.

Licensed To: City of Novi, County of

Oakland, Michigan

2/20 +fin bsmt. rec. sh

Comments/Influences

T1N, R8E, SEC 11 HOWELL'S WALLED LAKE SUB

W 10 FT OF LOT 4, ALSO ALL OF LOT 5, ALSO

E 25 FT OF LOT 6 3-1-94 FR 015

Tax Description

BEQIRAJ, XHILDA

42931 THIRTEEN MILE RD

NOVI MI 48377

Owner's Name/Address

42931 THIRTEEN MILE RD

Property Address

CLOSED

98d1359

01/19/1999

NEW CONST

2026 Est TCV 451,479 TCV/TFA: 244.31

CLOSED

99D0193

06/23/1999

HEATING/COOLING

MAP #: 

CLOSED

99d0606

06/30/1999

PORCH/DECK

P.R.E. 100% 10/15/2021 

CLOSED

s17-0643

09/19/2017

FINISH BSMT

School: NOVI COMMUNITY SCHOOLS

Status

Number

Date

Building Permit(s)

Zoning: R-4

Class: RESIDENTIAL-IMPROV

0.0

DEED

L39723-P541

21-NOT USED/OTHER

PTA

10/26/2007

0

BODELL FAMILY, LLC 

BODELL, THOMAS

0.0

DEED

L50199-P625

21-NOT USED/OTHER

QC

12/01/2016

1

HICKS, MATTHEW L & ALETHA

HICKS, ALETHA

100.0

DEED

L50153-P795

03-ARM'S LENGTH

PTA

12/01/2016

270,000

HICKS, ALETHA

BODELL FAMILY, LLC

100.0

PROPERTY TRANSFER 

03-ARM'S LENGTH

PTA

10/15/2021

360,000

BEQIRAJ, XHILDA

HICKS, MATTHEW L & ALETHA

Prcnt.

Trans.

Verified

By

Liber

& Page

Terms of Sale

Inst.

Type

Sale

Date

Sale

Price

Grantee

Grantor

05/19/2026

Page 2

Class: C

Effec. Age: 27

Floor Area: 1,848 

Total Base New : 319,662 E.C.F.

Total Depr Cost: 233,352 X 1.600

Estimated T.C.V: 373,363 

Cost Est. for Res. Bldg: 1 Single Family TWO STORY B Cls C Blt 1999

(11) Heating System: Forced Heat & Cool

Ground Area = 974 SF Floor Area = 1848 SF.

Phy/Ab.Phy/Func/Econ/Comb. % Good=73/100/100/100/73

Building Areas

Stories Exterior Foundation Size Cost New Depr. Cost 

1 Story Siding Basement 208 

2 Story Siding Basement 766 

1 Story Siding Overhang 108 

 Total: 262,404 191,554

Other Additions/Adjustments

 Recreation Room 681 13,940 10,176 

Exterior

 Brick Veneer 160 2,861 2,089 

Plumbing

 3 Fixture Bath 1 4,833 3,528 

 2 Fixture Bath 1 3,234 2,361 

 Extra Sink 1 988 721 

 Separate Shower 1 1,414 1,032 

Porches

 WCP (1 Story) 52 3,622 2,644 

Deck

 Treated Wood 182 4,044 2,952 

Garages

Class: C Exterior: Siding Foundation: 42 Inch (Unfinished)

 Base Cost 462 22,250 16,242 

 Common Wall: 1.5 Wall 1 -4,191 -3,059 

Water/Sewer

 Public Water 1 1,581 1,154 

 Public Sewer 1 1,581 1,154 

<<<<< Calculations too long. See Valuation printout for complete pricing. >>>>>

Carport Area: 

Roof: 

Bsmnt Garage: 

Year Built: 1999

Car Capacity: 

Class: C

Exterior: Siding

Brick Ven.: 0

Stone Ven.: 0

Common Wall: 1.5 Wal

Foundation: 42 Inch

Finished ?: 

Auto. Doors: 0

Mech. Doors: 0

Area: 462

% Good: 0

Storage Area: 0

No Conc. Floor: 0

 (17) Garage

WCP (1 Story)

Treated Wood

52

182

Type

Area

 (16) Porches/Decks

Interior 1 Story

Interior 2 Story

2nd/Same Stack

Two Sided

Exterior 1 Story

Exterior 2 Story

Prefab 1 Story

Prefab 2 Story

Heat Circulator

Raised Hearth

Wood Stove

Direct-Vented Gas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (15) Fireplaces

Appliance Allow.

Cook Top

Dishwasher

Garbage Disposal

Bath Heater

Vent Fan

Hot Tub

Unvented Hood

Vented Hood

Intercom

Jacuzzi Tub

Jacuzzi repl.Tub

Oven

Microwave

Standard Range

Self Clean Range

Sauna

Trash Compactor

Central Vacuum

Security System

 

 

1

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (15) Built-ins

 Lump Sum Items:

Public Water

Public Sewer

Water Well

1000 Gal Septic

2000 Gal Septic

1

1

 

 

 

 (14) Water/Sewer

Average Fixture(s)

3 Fixture Bath

2 Fixture Bath

Softener, Auto

Softener, Manual

Solar Water Heat

No Plumbing

Extra Toilet

Extra Sink

Separate Shower

Ceramic Tile Floor

Ceramic Tile Wains

Ceramic Tub Alcove

Vent Fan

 

2

1

 

 

 

 

 

1

1

 

 

 

 

 (13) Plumbing

Few

 

Ave.

 

Many

X

No. of Elec. Outlets

Min

 

Ord.

 

Ex.

X

 No./Qual. of Fixtures

Amps Service

0

 (12) Electric

Central Air

Wood Furnace

 

 

Forced Air w/o Ducts

Forced Air w/ Ducts 

Forced Hot Water

Electric Baseboard

Elec. Ceil. Radiant

Radiant (in-floor)

Electric Wall Heat

Space Heater

Wall/Floor Furnace

Forced Heat & Cool

Heat Pump

No Heating/Cooling

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

Elec.

Steam

 

Oil

Coal

 

Gas

Wood

X

 (11) Heating/Cooling

 Joists: 

 Unsupported Len: 

 Cntr.Sup: 

 (10) Floor Support

Recreation SF

Living SF

Walkout Doors (B)

No Floor SF

Walkout Doors (A)

681

 

 

 

 

 (9) Basement Finish

Conc. Block

Poured Conc.

Stone

Treated Wood

Concrete Floor

Page 3

***

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

scanswer_val_class.pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM

VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-000414

 

Respondent’s Contact Information:

Filer Type:

Local Unit of Government

Local Unit of Government:

City Of Novi (OAKLAND)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

E-mail Address

 

Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any:

First Name

Jeanette

M.I. 

Last Name

Schrameck

Firm Name (if any)

City of Novi

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

45175 Ten Mile Rd

City or Town

Novi

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48175

Telephone Number

2483470486

E-mail Address

jschrameck@cityofnovi.org

 

 

Subject Property Information:

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings.

 *If necessary, attach a separate sheet.

N/A 

Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more?

Yes

 

Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal:

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

The 2026 March Board of Review, acting within its authority as prescribed under State of Michigan Statute MCL 211.27a(3) denied petitioner's protest of assess

value. The Board of Review cited the property "at market value."

The assessment as equalized does not exceed 50% of True Cash Value. The sales of similar properties justifies the value.

 

Jurisdictional Issues:

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES:

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review?

Yes

If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended:

March

If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? 

*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.

If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

If yes, please cite the Board’s authority?

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact?

No

If yes, please explain

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order?

No

If yes, when was it issued?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE:

When was the Notice of Uncapping issued?

Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped?

 

 

Valuation Information:

Parcel Identification Number:

50-22-11-102-021

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

 Residential (check one)

Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review:

225740

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

198880

What do you believe is the fair market value?

451480

What do you believe is the taxable value?

 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent’s Signature: 

/s/ Jeanette Schrameck

Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature:

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC_Order_of_Default_of_Petition.2026-05-14_07-02-10.pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Xhilda Beqiraj,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

MTT Docket No. 26-000414

City Of Novi,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

hearing

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.i

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: May 14, 2026

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service