The Kroger Co Of Michigan Petitioner Vs. Township Of Saginaw Respondent
- Petitioner
- The Kroger Co Of Michigan
- Respondent
- Township Of Saginaw
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-001439-TT
- Status
- Ready Schedule
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Saginaw
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Documentation | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/25/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Proof of Service of Misc Documents was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/25/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 09/25/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Appearance | RESP | Not recorded | 09/18/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Proof of service of petition was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/08/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 08/13/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/13/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/26/2026 | $600.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
BRAUN KENDRICK FRANCIS J. KEATING ATTORNEYS AT LAW Attorney TEL: 989.631.1027 FAX: 989.631.9880 EMAIL: frakea@braunkendrick.com September 25, 2026 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Ms. Samantha M. Welton Chief Clerk Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 Re: The Kroger Co of Michigan v Township of Saginaw MTT Docket No.: 26-001439 Dear Ms. Welton: Enclosed please find Respondent’s Answer to Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition and Proof of Service for the above-referenced matter. Please file the same in your usual manner. Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions regarding it, please contact me. Very truly ges FIK/1s Enclosures cc: Client (w/encs) Mikki Silvey (w/encs) Alex Morse (w/encs) Cameron Beckner (w/encs) 4927-7003-3107, v. 1 BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER PLC. MIDLAND SAGINAW MT. PLEASANT ite A BRAUNKENDRICK.COM
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL THE KROGER CO OF MICHIGAN, Petitioner, MTT Docket No.: 26-001439 v TOWNSHIP OF SAGINAW, Respondent. DUCHARME, MCMILLEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER P.L.C. By: Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) By: Francis J. Keating (P39223) Alex Morse Attorneys for Respondent Cameron Beckner 4301 Fashion Square Blvd. Representatives for Petitioner Saginaw, MI 48603 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 (989) 498-2100 Indianapolis, IN 46240 frakea@braunkendrick.com (317) 596-3260 msilvey(@dmainc.com PROOF OF SERVICE LEE STADLER, duly sworn, deposes and says that she is a secretary in the employ of BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER P.L.C., attorneys for the Respondent, Township of Saginaw, and states that on thee) 5 day of September, 2026, she served a copy of Respondent’s Answer to Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition via first class mail, by placing same in an envelope with sufficient postage attached and plainly addressed to: Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey, Alex Morse, Cameron Beckner, 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375, Indianapolis, IN 46240. in. Shadi LEE STADLER 4924-5460-8339, v. 1
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-001439 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Respondent Files Document Type: Proof of Service: Misc Documents Attachment File Name: The Kroger Co of Michigan v Township of Saginaw (26-001439) Proof of Service Document Type: Documentation Attachment File Name: The Kroger Co of Michigan v Township of Saginaw (26-001439) correspondence Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL THE KROGER CO OF MICHIGAN, Petitioner, v TOWNSHIP OF SAGINAW, Respondent. MTT Docket No.: 26-001439 DUCHARME, MCMILLEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. By: Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Alex Morse Cameron Beckner Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (317) 596-3260 msilvey@dmainc.com amorse@dmainc.com cbeckner@dmainc.com BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER P.L.C. By: Francis J. Keating (P39223) Attorneys for Respondent 4301 Fashion Square Blvd. Saginaw, MI 48603 (989) 498-2100 frakea@braunkendrick.com RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION NOW COMES Respondent, Township of Saginaw, by and through its attorneys, Braun Kendrick Finkbeiner P.L.C., and for its Answer to Petition, states as follows: 1: Admitted. 2: Admitted. 3; Admitted. 4. Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in paragraph 4. 5% Admitted. 4909-3541-9090, v. 1
Page 2
6. Respondent admits no protest to the Board of Review was required. 7. Admitted. 8. Admitted. 9. Admitted. 10. Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in paragraph 10. 11. Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in paragraph 11. 12. Admitted. 13. Admitted. The Notice of Assessment for tax year 2026 is attached as Exhibit A. 14. Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in paragraph 14. Respondent denies as untrue that the current true cash value, state equalized value and taxable value for the subject property, are incorrect. 15. Respondent admits Petitioner has correctly determined the values in contention by subtracting its erroneous value claims from the values determined by the Board of Review. 16. Respondent denies as untrue the allegations and any implication that the current assessment of the subject property is incorrect. 16a. Respondent denies as untrue the allegations in paragraph 16a. 16b. Respondent denies as untrue the allegations in paragraph 16b. 16¢c. Respondent denies as untrue the allegations in paragraph 16c. 16d. Respondent denies as untrue the allegations in paragraph 16d. 4909-3541-9090, v. 1
Page 3
NEW MATTERS AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 1. Petitioner has failed to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action against Respondent. 2. Petitioner has failed to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, discrimination, or illegality on the part of the Respondent. 3. Petitioner may not be the real party in interest to bring this tax appeal. 4. Petitioner may not have standing to bring this tax appeal. 5. Petitioner has failed to show that any factor other than fifty percent (50%) was applied to the true cash value of Petitioner’s property, as well as all others, to arrive at the respective assessments appearing on the roll, and also fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegations that the property’s taxable value is improper. 6. Respondent has properly and lawfully assessed Petitioner’s property and established its taxable value in accordance with statutory and constitutional requirements. 7. The subject property was uniformly assessed in accordance with Michigan law. 8. Respondent reserves the right to assert additional affirmative defenses during the pendency of this action. WHEREFORE, Respondent, Township of Saginaw, respectfully requests that this Honorable Tribunal provide it with the following relief: A. Dismiss the Petition with prejudice, and award Respondent its costs and attorney fees wrongfully incurred in the defense of this action; and B. Provide Respondent with such other relief as the Tribunal deems appropriate. 4909-3541-9090, v. 1
Page 4
BRAUN KE BEINER P.L.C. Dated: September 25, 2026 BY: FRANCIS J, KEATING (P39223) Attorney for Respondent 4909-3541-9090, v. 1
Page 5
EXHIBIT A
Page 6
Micha Department of Treasury, THIS IS NOT A TAX BILL L-4400 Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification This form Is Issued under tha authority of Public Act 206 of 1833, Sec. 211.24c and Sec.211.34c, as amended. This Is a mode] it notice to be used by the local assessor. FROM SAGINAW CHARTER TOWNSHIP PARCEL IDENTIFICATION TREENA CHICK, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 23-12-4-16-3008-004 P.O. BOX 6400 PROPERTY ADDRESS:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001439 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government Township Of Saginaw (SAGINAW) First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Francis M.I. J Last Name Keating Firm Name (if any) Braun Kendrick Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 4301 Fashion Square Blvd. City or Town Saginaw State Michigan ZIP Code 48603 Telephone Number 9894982100 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) frakea@braunkendrick.com Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Francis J. Keating /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
BRAUN KENDRICK FRANCIS J. KEATING ATTORNEYS AT LAW Attorney TEL: 989.631.1027 FAX: 989.631.9880 EMAIL: frakea@braunkendrick.com September 17, 2026 VIA E-MAIL: taxtrib@michigan.gov Ms. Samantha M. Welton Chief Clerk Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 Re: The Kroger Co of Michigan v Township of Saginaw MTT Docket No.: 26-001439 Dear Ms. Welton: Enclosed please find Respondent’s Appearance and Proof of Service for the above-referenced matter. Please file the same in your usual manner. Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions regarding it, please contact me. FIK/Is Enclosures cc: Client (w/encs) Mikki Silvey (w/encs) Alex Morse (w/encs) Cameron Beckner (w/encs) 4938-9808-2257, v. 1 A8 BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER PL.C. MIDLAND SAGINAW MT. PLEASANT BRAUN KEN DRICK.COM
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL THE KROGER CO OF MICHIGAN, Petitioner, MTT Docket No.: 26-001439 v TOWNSHIP OF SAGINAW, Respondent. DUCHARME, MCMILLEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER P.L.C. By: Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) By: Francis J. Keating (P39223) Alex Morse Attorneys for Respondent Cameron Beckner 4301 Fashion Square Blvd. Representatives for Petitioner Saginaw, MI 48603 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 (989) 498-2100 Indianapolis, IN 46240 frakea@braunkendrick.com (317) 596-3260 msilvey@dmainc.com amorse@dmainc.com cbeckner@dmainc.com APPEARANCE NOW COMES Braun Kendrick Finkbeiner P.L.C., by Francis J. Keating, and hereby enters its Appearance on behalf of Respondent, Township of Saginaw. BRAUN KENDRI EINERPIE CE Dated: September 7 2026 BY: FRANCIS. KEATING (P39223) Attorney for\R¢spondent 4906-6394-5937, v. 1
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
THE KROGER CO OF MICHIGAN,
Petitioner,
v
TOWNSHIP OF SAGINAW,
Respondent.
MTT Docket No.: 26-001439
DUCHARME, MCMILLEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
By:
Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494)
Alex Morse
Cameron Beckner
Representatives for Petitioner
9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375
Indianapolis, IN 46240
(317) 596-3260
msilvey(@dmainc.com
amorse(@dmainc.com
cbeckner@dmainc.com
LCA
TR 1S
00 ¢
BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER P.L.C.
By:
Francis J. Keating (P39223)
Attorneys for Respondent
4301 Fashion Square Blvd.
Saginaw, MI 48603
(989) 498-2100
frakea@braunkendrick.com
PROOF OF SERVICE
LEE STADLER, duly sworn, deposes and says that she is a secretary in the employ of
BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER P.L.C., attorneys for the Respondent, Township of Saginaw,
and states that on the
\“("“day of September, 2026, she served
a copy of Respondent’s
Appearance via first class mail, by placing same in an envelope with sufficient postage attached
and plainly addressed to:
Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey, Alex Morse, Cameron Beckner, 9229
Delegates Row, Suite 375, Indianapolis, IN 46240.
4929-5324-9745, v.
1
a
LEE STADLERThese are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL THE KROGER CO. OF MICHIGAN. Petitioner, Saginaw Charter Township, Respondent. MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001439-TT PROOF OF SERVICE Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 8 day of September 2026 she served a copy of the Petition upon the following persons by placing same in an envelope properly addressed to each via USPS first class thereon: Vanessa Guerra Saginaw County Clerk 111 S. Michigan Ave. Saginaw, MI 48602 Denise Joseph Saginaw County Equalization Director 111 S. Michigan Avenue Saginaw, MI 48602 Saginaw Twp Community School Michele T. DeShone, School Board Secretary 3465 North Center Road Saginaw, MI 48603 Michigan State Treasurer Department of Treasury Treasury Building 430 West Allegan Lansing, MI 48922 Micke (© Soe Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Authorized Agent
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL THE KROGER CO. OF MICHIGAN. ) ) Petitioner, MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001439-TT ) ) ) Saginaw Charter Township, ) ) ) ) Respondent. PROOF OF SERVICE Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 8" day of September 2026 she served a copy of the Petition upon the following persons by placing same in an envelope properly addressed to each via certified mail thereon: Treena Chick Gary Fahndrich Saginaw Charter Township Assessor Saginaw Township Supervisor 4980 Shattuck Rd 4980 Shattuck Rd Saginaw, MI 48608-6400 Saginaw, MI 48608-6400 Lisa Y. Ingram Saginaw Charter Township Clerk 4980 Shattuck Rd Saginaw, MI 48608-6400 Mictas (0 5 Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Authorized Agent
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL THE KROGER CO. OF MICHIGAN . MTT Docket No. 26-001439-TT Petitioner, v Saginaw Charter Township Respondent. / Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Alex Morse Cameron Beckner DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (317) 596-3260 msilvey@dmainc.com amorse@dmainc.com cbeckner@dmainc.com ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No.: 23-12-4-16-3008-004 2. The property identified above is real 3. Only one parcel of property is the subject of this appeal. 4. Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the subject of this appeal. 5. The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial-Improved
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 26-001439-TT Page 2 of 3 6. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. The assessment(s) at issue were not protested to Respondents March, July, or December Board of Review as a protest was not required. The property or properties at issue are in Saginaw County. The property or properties’ address is: 4672 State St, Saginaw, MI 48603 The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: Saginaw Charter Township Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202 This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values and uniformity. The tax year at issue is: 2026. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 2026 Board of Review are: Tax True Cash Assessed Taxable Year Value Value Value 2026 $14,408,800 $7,204,400 $5,091,872 Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2026 are no more than the following: Tax True Cash State Equalized Taxable Year Value Value Value 2026 $5,447,000 $2,723,500 $2,723,500 The values in contention for tax year 2026 are: Tax True Cash State Equalized Taxable Year Value Value Value 2026 $8,961,800 $4,480,900 $2,368,372
Page 5
MTT Docket No. 26-001439-TT Page 3 of 3 16. The 2026 assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and collected are invalid because: (a) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (b) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, is at a higher percentage of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (c) The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and (d) The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal hear this case and enter an order reducing the 2026 true cash, state equalized and taxable values and direct Respondent to
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-001439 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition Attachment File Name: SCANNED KROGER - SAGINAW CHARTER TOWNSHIP 26-001439 POS Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL , MTT Docket No. 26-_________-TT Petitioner, v , Respondent. / Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Alex Morse Cameron Beckner DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (317) 596-3260 msilvey@dmainc.com amorse@dmainc.com cbeckner@dmainc.com / ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No.: 2. The property identified above is . 3. Only one parcel of property is the subject of this appeal. 4. Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the subject of this appeal. 5. The property identified above is classified as . THE KROGER CO. OF MICHIGAN Saginaw Charter Township 23-12-4-16-3008-004 real 201 Commercial-Improved
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-_________-TT Page 2 of 3 6. The assessment(s) at issue were not protested to Respondent’s March, July, or December Board of Review as a protest was not required. 7. The property or properties at issue are in ________________ County. 8. The property or properties’ address is: ______________________________________________________________________. 9. The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: _____________________________. 10. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: ______________________________________________________________________. 11. This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values and uniformity. 12. The tax year at issue is: 2026. 13. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 2026 Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 14. Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2026 are no more than the following: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 15. The values in contention for tax year 2026 are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 Saginaw 4672 State St, Saginaw, MI 48603 Saginaw Charter Township 1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202 $14,408,800 $7,204,400 $5,091,872 $5,447,000 $2,723,500 $2,723,500 $8,961,800 $4,480,900 $2,368,372
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 26-_________-TT Page 3 of 3 16. The 2026 assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and collected are invalid because: (a) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (b) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, is at a higher percentage of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (c) The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and (d) The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal hear this case and enter an order reducing the 2026 true cash, state equalized and taxable values and direct Respondent to refund to Petitioner any excess taxes, fees, and penalties paid, plus interest and costs, and all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law and as is appropriate under the circumstances. Respectfully submitted, DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Dated: __________ ___, 2026 By: ______________________________ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Petitioner’s Representative May 26
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name THE KROGER CO. OF MICHIGAN Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1014 Vine Street City or Town Cincinnati State Ohio ZIP Code 45202 Telephone Number 9174887825 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) msilvey@dmainc.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Michelle (Mikki) M.I. M Last Name Silvey Firm Name (if any) DuCharme, McMillen & Associates Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 9229 Delegates Row, Ste 375 City or Town Indianapolis State Indiana ZIP Code 46240 Telephone Number 917-488-7825 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) msilvey@dmainc.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 4672 State St Saginaw
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 48603 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Saginaw (SAGINAW) County Saginaw If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 23-12-4-16-3008-004 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 7204400 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 5091872 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 5447000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 2723500 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 2723500 Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey Payment Information Amount: 600 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26052686955240 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 The Kroger Co Of Michigan, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-001439 Township Of Saginaw, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: August 13, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL , MTT Docket No. 26-_________-TT Petitioner, v , Respondent. / Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Alex Morse Cameron Beckner DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (317) 596-3260 msilvey@dmainc.com amorse@dmainc.com cbeckner@dmainc.com / ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No.: 2. The property identified above is . 3. Only one parcel of property is the subject of this appeal. 4. Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the subject of this appeal. 5. The property identified above is classified as . THE KROGER CO. OF MICHIGAN Saginaw Charter Township 23-12-4-16-3008-004 real 201 Commercial-Improved
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-_________-TT Page 2 of 3 6. The assessment(s) at issue were not protested to Respondent’s March, July, or December Board of Review as a protest was not required. 7. The property or properties at issue are in ________________ County. 8. The property or properties’ address is: ______________________________________________________________________. 9. The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: _____________________________. 10. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: ______________________________________________________________________. 11. This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values and uniformity. 12. The tax year at issue is: 2026. 13. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 2026 Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 14. Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2026 are no more than the following: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 15. The values in contention for tax year 2026 are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 Saginaw 4672 State St, Saginaw, MI 48603 Saginaw Charter Township 1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202 $14,408,800 $7,204,400 $5,091,872 $5,447,000 $2,723,500 $2,723,500 $8,961,800 $4,480,900 $2,368,372
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 26-_________-TT Page 3 of 3 16. The 2026 assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and collected are invalid because: (a) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (b) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, is at a higher percentage of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (c) The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and (d) The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal hear this case and enter an order reducing the 2026 true cash, state equalized and taxable values and direct Respondent to refund to Petitioner any excess taxes, fees, and penalties paid, plus interest and costs, and all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law and as is appropriate under the circumstances. Respectfully submitted, DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Dated: __________ ___, 2026 By: ______________________________ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Petitioner’s Representative May 26
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name THE KROGER CO. OF MICHIGAN Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1014 Vine Street City or Town Cincinnati State Ohio ZIP Code 45202 Telephone Number 9174887825 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) msilvey@dmainc.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Michelle (Mikki) M.I. M Last Name Silvey Firm Name (if any) DuCharme, McMillen & Associates Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 9229 Delegates Row, Ste 375 City or Town Indianapolis State Indiana ZIP Code 46240 Telephone Number 917-488-7825 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) msilvey@dmainc.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 4672 State St Saginaw
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 48603 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Saginaw (SAGINAW) County Saginaw If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 23-12-4-16-3008-004 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 7204400 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 5091872 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 5447000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 2723500 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 2723500 Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey Payment Information Amount: 600 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26052686955240 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.