Record Finder / 26-002579-TT
Michigan
3560 Dixie Dt LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Buena Vista Respondent
- Petitioner
- 3560 Dixie Dt LLC
- Respondent
- Township Of Buena Vista
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-002579-TT
- Status
- Extended Default Petitioner
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Saginaw
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Order Extending P's Default | Not recorded | 4 | 10/06/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Order Holding Party in Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/02/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 07/08/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/08/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 04/06/2026 | $400.00 | Download |
Documents
26-002579 Extend Default (no response).pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 3560 Dixie DT LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 26-002579 Buena Vista Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that it entered an order holding Petitioner in default on September 2, 2026, because Petitioner failed to file proof evidencing the service of the petition.1 Petitioner was required to cure the default by filing proof evidencing the service fo the petition on the six parties in interest within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with this order.2 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the default: (1) file proof evidencing the service of the petition on the six parties in interest in accordance with TTR 227, (2) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, and (3) pay the $50.00 fee required for the filing of the motion. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order.3 1 The order further stated, “Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002579 Page 2 of 2 Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of the case, as provided by TTR 237.4 Entered: October 6, 2026 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm kac PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 4 See also MCL 205.732.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Order_Holding_Party_in_Default.2026-09-02_10-17-24.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 3560 Dixie DT LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-002579 Township Of Buena Vista, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner failed to file proof evidencing service of the petition. See TTR 227. The Tribunal finds that placing Petitioner in default, rather than dismissal of this case, may effectuate the efficient administration of this appeal. As such, Petitioner must submit the proof of service within 14 days of the entry of this order. Tribunal rules and information on Entire Tribunal petitions can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: September 2, 2026 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002579 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 3560 Dixie DT LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-002579 Township Of Buena Vista, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner failed to file proof evidencing service of the petition. See TTR 227. The Tribunal finds that placing Petitioner in default, rather than dismissal of this case, may effectuate the efficient administration of this appeal. As such, Petitioner must submit the proof of service within 14 days of the entry of this order. Tribunal rules and information on Entire Tribunal petitions can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.2 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: September 2, 2026 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 26-002579 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
3560 Dixie DT LLC.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED Deptol Trasuy APR 1 6 2026 SE @ > APR 13 2026 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNA STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR 2560 DWE BY, LL CREE KRMISE |, MMB Oa MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) \) Buea VISTA aaa TP yr oto, Irn D6LIO1TS-1 O4/15/2% Chi: 6231 Ant: $400.00 Respondent(s) TD: BEST STORAGE OF HOWELL II LLC ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: jo-12~-5-27 ~30i0- 007 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is _ real personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___ Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) PIA 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) v/s 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): NONE 6. The property identified above is classified as Co MM SNCIAL
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary). PROTEST WAS MADRS AT ME oan oF LSVIEW , IDCUFTFI eB nT PERNCTIoN Wal Svan By BVT 9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 10. The property or properties at issue are located in __Sa&iJAVS County. Th property or properties’ address is: B80 PI\WKIE HW SAGINAW, MT A'geo\ [©] 11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): _ Buea STA CHATS. TOWNSH | P= 12. Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: Tob NM: oD US 23% RAGHTON | MI A-RI1A— 13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): \___the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): NA 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value | Assessed Value Taxable Value 202% Goo, ovo 220 coe 200,000 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 29k 23) 107.50 hWs,55 ts ws. ssl.2s 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value rolle (od0 ovo 00,000 209,000 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): LEdULE SEV £ TAXABLE VALS Fram #200000 vo Xb WS 5515 20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the
Page 4
MTT Docket No. Page 4 of 4 Signature of Petitioner's Authorized a giee ye or, if none, Petitioner: Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: a EAA Email Address: “rams e 2 (= VANS. cn Mailing Address: Telephone Number: DVO ~7120~-0%07] Date: 4 o J 2
Page 5
Dollan Tea Te Bunda & IS VACANT PE To Tee MUCH MEET. THE RUDING HAS VALOD 2403 sav Fy 4as/sr 44 u # 29. z4— 25060 SF: 95° gee : “Xx Z4\S oY 39.14
Page 6
Ae STATE OF MICHIGAN ’ GRETCHENWHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LIGEREINGIAND: REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON] BROWN, DFA Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) M True Cash and Taxable Value [1 Taxable Value Only (calculation) [J Uncapping of Taxable Value Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal Dollar ™M2 HAS VACATED “DRS TUWING Due To THEPT, Two Sinicht THUNIRING WFR A Few WUnbuad FET HAVE SoD | Fore Hhza,5o 2924 Pan STH. MEY AY conan ote w/ Meng PARMLNG, TM ATTAOANE. My CALCU LATION OF TAGE VALUE OF Hh z%\,| 01 50 R22 $115,685) 28 AL Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 74) Yes O No If Yes, check which BOR you attended: [x March ) July [] December If No, please check the applicable reason(s): O Not required to attend Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, Include explanation In Section 5) Appealing within 36 days of State Tax Commission Order Gi} Appealing within 36 days of racelpt of Notice of Uncapping Other If you checkad “other” above, explain:
Page 7
®DOLLAR TREE. | FAMILYDDDLIAR. June 11, 2025 VIA UPS Next Day Air: 810-632-9977 3560 Dixie DT, LLC 700 North Old US 23 Brighton, MI 48114 Attention: Steven Krause Re: Dollar Tree Store No. 05917, 3560 Dixie Highway, Saginaw, Michigan Dear Mr. Krause: Please refer to the Lease dated January 7, 2015, between your Company, and Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., for premises located at 3560 Dixie Highway, in
Page 8
3
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-07-08_17-51-43.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 3560 Dixie DT LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-002579 Township Of Buena Vista, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: July 8, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 3560 Dixie DT LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-002579 Township Of Buena Vista, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: July 8, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 3560 Dixie DT LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-002579 Township Of Buena Vista, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
3560 Dixie DT LLC.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED Deptol Trasuy APR 1 6 2026 SE @ > APR 13 2026 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNA STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR 2560 DWE BY, LL CREE KRMISE |, MMB Oa MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) \) Buea VISTA aaa TP yr oto, Irn D6LIO1TS-1 O4/15/2% Chi: 6231 Ant: $400.00 Respondent(s) TD: BEST STORAGE OF HOWELL II LLC ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: jo-12~-5-27 ~30i0- 007 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is _ real personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___ Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) PIA 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) v/s 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): NONE 6. The property identified above is classified as Co MM SNCIAL
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary). PROTEST WAS MADRS AT ME oan oF LSVIEW , IDCUFTFI eB nT PERNCTIoN Wal Svan By BVT 9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 10. The property or properties at issue are located in __Sa&iJAVS County. Th property or properties’ address is: B80 PI\WKIE HW SAGINAW, MT A'geo\ [©] 11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): _ Buea STA CHATS. TOWNSH | P= 12. Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: Tob NM: oD US 23% RAGHTON | MI A-RI1A— 13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): \___the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): NA 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value | Assessed Value Taxable Value 202% Goo, ovo 220 coe 200,000 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 29k 23) 107.50 hWs,55 ts ws. ssl.2s 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value rolle (od0 ovo 00,000 209,000 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): LEdULE SEV £ TAXABLE VALS Fram #200000 vo Xb WS 5515 20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the
Page 4
MTT Docket No. Page 4 of 4 Signature of Petitioner's Authorized a giee ye or, if none, Petitioner: Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: a EAA Email Address: “rams e 2 (= VANS. cn Mailing Address: Telephone Number: DVO ~7120~-0%07] Date: 4 o J 2
Page 5
Dollan Tea Te Bunda & IS VACANT PE To Tee MUCH MEET. THE RUDING HAS VALOD 2403 sav Fy 4as/sr 44 u # 29. z4— 25060 SF: 95° gee : “Xx Z4\S oY 39.14
Page 6
Ae STATE OF MICHIGAN ’ GRETCHENWHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LIGEREINGIAND: REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON] BROWN, DFA Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) M True Cash and Taxable Value [1 Taxable Value Only (calculation) [J Uncapping of Taxable Value Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal Dollar ™M2 HAS VACATED “DRS TUWING Due To THEPT, Two Sinicht THUNIRING WFR A Few WUnbuad FET HAVE SoD | Fore Hhza,5o 2924 Pan STH. MEY AY conan ote w/ Meng PARMLNG, TM ATTAOANE. My CALCU LATION OF TAGE VALUE OF Hh z%\,| 01 50 R22 $115,685) 28 AL Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 74) Yes O No If Yes, check which BOR you attended: [x March ) July [] December If No, please check the applicable reason(s): O Not required to attend Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, Include explanation In Section 5) Appealing within 36 days of State Tax Commission Order Gi} Appealing within 36 days of racelpt of Notice of Uncapping Other If you checkad “other” above, explain:
Page 7
®DOLLAR TREE. | FAMILYDDDLIAR. June 11, 2025 VIA UPS Next Day Air: 810-632-9977 3560 Dixie DT, LLC 700 North Old US 23 Brighton, MI 48114 Attention: Steven Krause Re: Dollar Tree Store No. 05917, 3560 Dixie Highway, Saginaw, Michigan Dear Mr. Krause: Please refer to the Lease dated January 7, 2015, between your Company, and Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., for premises located at 3560 Dixie Highway, in
Page 8
3
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.