Sheryl L Saliba Petitioner Vs. Township Of Sanilac Respondent

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Sheryl L Saliba, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-002257 

 

Sanilac Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO TRANSFER CASE 

FROM THE ENTIRE TRIBUNAL TO THE SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

CORRECTED ORDER HOLDING PETITIONER DEFAULT 

 

ORDER CORRECTING DOCKET 

 

On July 11, 2026, Petitioner filed a motion requesting transfer of this case from the 

Entire Tribunal to the Small Claims Division. In the motion, Petitioner states they 

intended to file this appeal in the Small Claims division and accidently filed the appeal 

incorrectly on the Tribunal’s website. 

 

The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file and finds that it “may, upon 

motion, transfer a contested case pending in the entire tribunal to the small claims 

division.”1 The amounts in contention for all tax years at issue in this appeal fall within 

the jurisdictional limits of the Small Claims Division and Respondent will not be 

prejudiced by the transfer due to the early stage of this case. As a result, the Tribunal 

finds it appropriate to grant Petitioner’s request. 

 

Further, the Tribunal finds it issued an order holding Petitioner in default on September 

11, 2026. The Tribunal erred in the entry of that order as it failed to consider that 

Petitioner’s motion, filed on July 11, 2026, already indicated that Petitioner elects to 

proceed in the Small Claims division.2 

 

Consequently, the Tribunal finds it appropriate to issue a corrected order. Specifically, 

Petitioner filed an Entire Tribunal case information sheet and paid a filing fee. Because 

a petition was not filed, the appeal is not properly pending. As such, Petitioner must file 

a Small Claims petition within 14 days of entry of this order. The petition shall note the 

docket number assigned by the Tribunal and if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing 

system, must be filed on the assigned docket number as an “amended petition.” Small 

Claims petition forms can be found on the Tribunal’s website at 

www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

 

1 TTR 237(5). 

2 TTR 271.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-002257 

Page 2 of 2 

 

Additionally, the Tribunal finds that based on the pleadings filed by Petitioner on June 9, 

2026, the Tribunal listed Sanilac County as Respondent in this case. However, the 

proper Respondent is Sanilac Township as that is the entity listed on the Board of 

Review’s decision for the subject property. Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Transfer this case from the Entire Tribunal 

to the Small Claims Division is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is held in Default. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the 

default: file a Small Claims Petition for Valuation Appeal form indicating the docket 

number previously assigned by the Tribunal, and if filing via the Tribunal’s e-filing 

system, must be filed as an “amended petition,” within 14 days of entry of this order.3 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the docket shall be CORRECTED to reflect Sanilac 

Township as the proper Respondent in this case. 

 

Failure to comply with this order will result in Petitioner being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default. 

 

 

Entered: October 1, 2026 

 

 

 

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm 

kac/jc 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Sheryl L Saliba, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-002257 

 

Sanilac Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO TRANSFER CASE 

FROM THE ENTIRE TRIBUNAL TO THE SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

CORRECTED ORDER HOLDING PETITIONER DEFAULT 

 

ORDER CORRECTING DOCKET 

 

On July 11, 2026, Petitioner filed a motion requesting transfer of this case from the 

Entire Tribunal to the Small Claims Division. In the motion, Petitioner states they 

intended to file this appeal in the Small Claims division and accidently filed the appeal 

incorrectly on the Tribunal’s website. 

 

The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file and finds that it “may, upon 

motion, transfer a contested case pending in the entire tribunal to the small claims 

division.”1 The amounts in contention for all tax years at issue in this appeal fall within 

the jurisdictional limits of the Small Claims Division and Respondent will not be 

prejudiced by the transfer due to the early stage of this case. As a result, the Tribunal 

finds it appropriate to grant Petitioner’s request. 

 

Further, the Tribunal finds it issued an order holding Petitioner in default on September 

11, 2026. The Tribunal erred in the entry of that order as it failed to consider that 

Petitioner’s motion, filed on July 11, 2026, already indicated that Petitioner elects to 

proceed in the Small Claims division.2 

 

Consequently, the Tribunal finds it appropriate to issue a corrected order. Specifically, 

Petitioner filed an Entire Tribunal case information sheet and paid a filing fee. Because 

a petition was not filed, the appeal is not properly pending. As such, Petitioner must file 

a Small Claims petition within 14 days of entry of this order. The petition shall note the 

docket number assigned by the Tribunal and if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing 

system, must be filed on the assigned docket number as an “amended petition.” Small 

Claims petition forms can be found on the Tribunal’s website at 

www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

 

1 TTR 237(5). 

2 TTR 271.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-002257 

Page 2 of 2 

 

Additionally, the Tribunal finds that based on the pleadings filed by Petitioner on June 9, 

2026, the Tribunal listed Sanilac County as Respondent in this case. However, the 

proper Respondent is Sanilac Township as that is the entity listed on the Board of 

Review’s decision for the subject property. Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Transfer this case from the Entire Tribunal 

to the Small Claims Division is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is held in Default. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the 

default: file a Small Claims Petition for Valuation Appeal form indicating the docket 

number previously assigned by the Tribunal, and if filing via the Tribunal’s e-filing 

system, must be filed as an “amended petition,” within 14 days of entry of this order.3 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the docket shall be CORRECTED to reflect Sanilac 

Township as the proper Respondent in this case. 

 

Failure to comply with this order will result in Petitioner being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default. 

 

 

Entered: October 1, 2026 

 

 

 

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm 

kac/jc 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Sheryl L Saliba, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-002257 

 

Sanilac Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO TRANSFER CASE 

FROM THE ENTIRE TRIBUNAL TO THE SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

CORRECTED ORDER HOLDING PETITIONER DEFAULT 

 

ORDER CORRECTING DOCKET 

 

On July 11, 2026, Petitioner filed a motion requesting transfer of this case from the 

Entire Tribunal to the Small Claims Division. In the motion, Petitioner states they 

intended to file this appeal in the Small Claims division and accidently filed the appeal 

incorrectly on the Tribunal’s website. 

 

The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file and finds that it “may, upon 

motion, transfer a contested case pending in the entire tribunal to the small claims 

division.”1 The amounts in contention for all tax years at issue in this appeal fall within 

the jurisdictional limits of the Small Claims Division and Respondent will not be 

prejudiced by the transfer due to the early stage of this case. As a result, the Tribunal 

finds it appropriate to grant Petitioner’s request. 

 

Further, the Tribunal finds it issued an order holding Petitioner in default on September 

11, 2026. The Tribunal erred in the entry of that order as it failed to consider that 

Petitioner’s motion, filed on July 11, 2026, already indicated that Petitioner elects to 

proceed in the Small Claims division.2 

 

Consequently, the Tribunal finds it appropriate to issue a corrected order. Specifically, 

Petitioner filed an Entire Tribunal case information sheet and paid a filing fee. Because 

a petition was not filed, the appeal is not properly pending. As such, Petitioner must file 

a Small Claims petition within 14 days of entry of this order. The petition shall note the 

docket number assigned by the Tribunal and if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing 

system, must be filed on the assigned docket number as an “amended petition.” Small 

Claims petition forms can be found on the Tribunal’s website at 

www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

 

1 TTR 237(5). 

2 TTR 271.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-002257 

Page 2 of 2 

 

Additionally, the Tribunal finds that based on the pleadings filed by Petitioner on June 9, 

2026, the Tribunal listed Sanilac County as Respondent in this case. However, the 

proper Respondent is Sanilac Township as that is the entity listed on the Board of 

Review’s decision for the subject property. Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Transfer this case from the Entire Tribunal 

to the Small Claims Division is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is held in Default. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the 

default: file a Small Claims Petition for Valuation Appeal form indicating the docket 

number previously assigned by the Tribunal, and if filing via the Tribunal’s e-filing 

system, must be filed as an “amended petition,” within 14 days of entry of this order.3 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the docket shall be CORRECTED to reflect Sanilac 

Township as the proper Respondent in this case. 

 

Failure to comply with this order will result in Petitioner being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default. 

 

 

Entered: October 1, 2026 

 

 

 

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm 

kac/jc 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUL 18 2026 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ~~ 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

July 

Dates July 

94, 2025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL REFUND REQUEST 

Payee Name: 

Snery 

Saliba 

Payee Address: M249 ER/e 

SC 

MTT Docket No: 2b- 002 2.517 

Amount of Refund Requested: $ 250.00 

Reason for Refund: 

[OFiling/Motion Fee Overpaid 

ODuplicate Docket 

tH{other ni § 

. 

; 

court he whole EAT) 

Payment Information: 

Docket Lookup Line # of Payment 

Date of Payment: 

¢ [4 N€. 

qth 202, 

ene 

TD 

[III - Listy Sul Loni 

Validation/Confirmation #: 

Requestor’s Signature: 

For Tribunal Use Only: 

Computation of Refund Amount: 

Amount paid: 

$ 

Granted: 

[1] 

Amount Due: 

$ 

Denied: 

[J 

Amount Refunded: 

$ 

Prepared by: 

Date:

Page 2

CEE 

OE 

EO 

OE Oe 

OY 

Shary 1. Saliba 

124 R———— ™ 

YOO 

OLS 

PORT GANTLAC, MT. #84 £9. aa 

Docket 2 

~ 022577 

A {A 

RSA 

Bayt 

fre! #212 - "270 o0- AT (28-005) 

LW 

2 S| | 

unal 

~ POBOX ~ 

30232 

Lansi, MI 4399

Page 3

— 

Se 

= 

a 

i 

SEV 

Wi 

ANY 

Bw 

WA #22 #0 

Es 

—_ 

| Ae 

AA 

dd 

rw 

PR) 

yr - 

/4 

ARE the 

/U 

ON 

| 

Bahl 

A 

== 

== 

om 

“ 

\5, 

IB 

y 

Oo LU tolue. 

Loerg 

) 

py 

a. 

aR 

A 

1 

$F) 

XZ 

fl 

78 

or? 

AA | 

1A 

—— 

cf 

EE 

SE. 

of 

thy 

NE 

fre fran 

OCs 

I 

Jit 

4 

[I 

[ 

Vi 

— 

ESN 

PENN 

Fis 

Bl 

, 

An 

0 

IE 

IE 

2595 

i 

a 

ee 

V(r 

il 

=————— 

od 

— 

yr 

oy 

Ed oa 

sD 

EE 

wl 

\ 

1 

Lui 

IS) 

dl 

BBY: 

‘4 

i) 

ih 

== 

Vi 

AN 

\ 

_ 

El 

| 3 U5) 

3 

4 

= 

Ak 

a) 

Faget 

EE 

EE 

>) 

[VY 

al 

PR) 

boo 

43 

hy 

PN 

= 

et 

===3 

tw 

\, 

9 

7a Bh, 

TN 

el 

VN 

W 

BR 

RAN 

IA 

ey 

Po.) 

hd 

\ 

hl): yo 

31) 

3 

RY 

— 

ON 

Wad 

i 

oo 

JE 

JK 

so 

1a 

ies 

1) 

\ 

—— 

— 

= 

_— 

—_— 

Wy 

Wy 

— 

(y 

Q 

bY 

R 

A 

Oh 

t 

21 

(t \Y 

4 

\j yn 

[R 

\ 

J 

aby UN 

BN 

£5) 

A 

Wh 

\y 

PO

Page 4

sic <frPercont-quatified agricultural exemption granted by assessor (Enter 0 if exemption 

Percent qualified agriculiural exemption requested by owner {Enter 100 if full 

Very 

2/12 

2,43 

Michigan Department of Treasury 

8 (Rev. 

12:25) 

Petition to Board of Review 

L-4035 

This form is Issued under the authority of P.A. 206 of 1893. as amended, Filing is voluntary; however. you may not appeal to the Michigan Tex Tribunal unless you first protest 

to tne Board of Review, except when the property is classified as commercial real. industrial rea), or developmental real. You may nol appeal property classification lo the State 

Tax Commission unless you firs! protest lo the Board of Review. 

TO BE COMPLETED BY OWNER OR OWNER'S AGENT 

Owner's Name: Ni Print or 

A 

ha 

“Bheryl 

Township or Oty! 

County 

B 

| 

Year of Appeal 

Village of po Sonilat 

Santac 

202 

, illage 

¢ protests the assessed value and/or the tentative taxable value andlor the property classification and/or the qualified 

agricultural property exemption of the following described property: 

Property identiied (Parcel code required, Prapery address and legal description optional.) 

Toreel #212 210-000 - 124-00 

"1249 Eire ST, Port Soniloc, MI 48469 

Petitioner's Name {if Other than Owner, Please Print or Type) 

[EE 

Protested Item: 

Xx Assessed Value 

Xx] Tentative 

1 Taxable Status 0 Classification 

| Qualified Agricultural 

Taxable Value 

{exemption) 

Property Exemption 

1, PROTEST OF ASSESSMENT 

Complete this section fora protest of assessed value, including assessed value changes associated with exempt stalus and denied or late filed 

‘personal properly forms. 

$y Value 

Owner's 

Estimate of True Cash Value (Market Value) 

Z, 800. 

228,000 

2. PROTEST OF TAXABLE VALUE 

Complete this section for a protest of Taxable Value. 

Reason: 

0 Value of Losses 

Value of Additions 

0 Povérly Exemption 

Od Uncapping % 

T3 PROTEST 

OF CLASSIFICATION 

Complete this section for a request to change the classification. The Board of Review must make their decision regarding classification in accordance 

with Section 211.34¢ of the Michigan Compiled Laws. The Board of Review shall not be influenced by the effect that a particular classification has on 

Ihat property's slatus as a homeowner's principal residence or qualified agriculiural property.) 

Classification of property on this year's assessment roll 

Classification should be {check one of the following): 

’ [7 Agricultural 

Il Industrial 

0 Timber Cutover 

I] Utility (Personal Property Only) 

[} Commercial 

X Residential 

0 Developmental 

4. PROTEST OF EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY 

If the assessor has denied or changed the percentage of the exemplion from the 18 mills of local school operating tax for qualified agricultural proper- 

ty. the owner may appeal this action to the March Board of Review. THE BOARD OF REVIEW HAS NO AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER OR ACT UPON 

THE EXEMPTION FROM THE 18 SCHOOL OPERATING MILLS FOR HOMEOWNER'S PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE PROPERTIES.) 

denied} 

exemption requested) 

REASON FOR PROTEST 

State reason(s) for protest of assessed value and/or Ihe tentative taxable value andlor taxable status

Page 5

'

Page 6

202

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

 

 

September 15, 2026 

 

 

Sheryl L. Saliba 

wolf.s411@yahoo.com 

 

 

RE: MTT Docket Number 26-002257 

 

Dear Ms. Saliba, 

 

 

The Tribunal is in receipt of your correspondence requesting a refund of the petition 

filing fee in light of the request to transfer your case to the Small Claims Division. 

Petition filing fees are determined and “shall be paid upon filing . . . .”1 [Emphasis 

added.] Although it was accidental, at the time of filing, the Entire Tribunal Division was 

elected, which requires the payment of filing fees. Filing fees cover costs of initiating an 

appeal, establishing an electronic file and docket number, and processing the appeal. 

In this case, all the above procedures were accomplished. Therefore, unfortunately, 

your request for a refund is denied. 

 

 

 

Sincerely, 

 

 

/s/ Samantha MS Welton 

Chief Clerk 

 

 

 

1 TTR 223(1).

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUL 18 2026 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ~~ 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

July 

Dates July 

94, 2025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL REFUND REQUEST 

Payee Name: 

Snery 

Saliba 

Payee Address: M249 ER/e 

SC 

MTT Docket No: 2b- 002 2.517 

Amount of Refund Requested: $ 250.00 

Reason for Refund: 

[OFiling/Motion Fee Overpaid 

ODuplicate Docket 

tH{other ni § 

. 

; 

court he whole EAT) 

Payment Information: 

Docket Lookup Line # of Payment 

Date of Payment: 

¢ [4 N€. 

qth 202, 

ene 

TD 

[III - Listy Sul Loni 

Validation/Confirmation #: 

Requestor’s Signature: 

For Tribunal Use Only: 

Computation of Refund Amount: 

Amount paid: 

$ 

Granted: 

[1] 

Amount Due: 

$ 

Denied: 

[J 

Amount Refunded: 

$ 

Prepared by: 

Date:

Page 2

CEE 

OE 

EO 

OE Oe 

OY 

Shary 1. Saliba 

124 R———— ™ 

YOO 

OLS 

PORT GANTLAC, MT. #84 £9. aa 

Docket 2 

~ 022577 

A {A 

RSA 

Bayt 

fre! #212 - "270 o0- AT (28-005) 

LW 

2 S| | 

unal 

~ POBOX ~ 

30232 

Lansi, MI 4399

Page 3

— 

Se 

= 

a 

i 

SEV 

Wi 

ANY 

Bw 

WA #22 #0 

Es 

—_ 

| Ae 

AA 

dd 

rw 

PR) 

yr - 

/4 

ARE the 

/U 

ON 

| 

Bahl 

A 

== 

== 

om 

“ 

\5, 

IB 

y 

Oo LU tolue. 

Loerg 

) 

py 

a. 

aR 

A 

1 

$F) 

XZ 

fl 

78 

or? 

AA | 

1A 

—— 

cf 

EE 

SE. 

of 

thy 

NE 

fre fran 

OCs 

I 

Jit 

4 

[I 

[ 

Vi 

— 

ESN 

PENN 

Fis 

Bl 

, 

An 

0 

IE 

IE 

2595 

i 

a 

ee 

V(r 

il 

=————— 

od 

— 

yr 

oy 

Ed oa 

sD 

EE 

wl 

\ 

1 

Lui 

IS) 

dl 

BBY: 

‘4 

i) 

ih 

== 

Vi 

AN 

\ 

_ 

El 

| 3 U5) 

3 

4 

= 

Ak 

a) 

Faget 

EE 

EE 

>) 

[VY 

al 

PR) 

boo 

43 

hy 

PN 

= 

et 

===3 

tw 

\, 

9 

7a Bh, 

TN 

el 

VN 

W 

BR 

RAN 

IA 

ey 

Po.) 

hd 

\ 

hl): yo 

31) 

3 

RY 

— 

ON 

Wad 

i 

oo 

JE 

JK 

so 

1a 

ies 

1) 

\ 

—— 

— 

= 

_— 

—_— 

Wy 

Wy 

— 

(y 

Q 

bY 

R 

A 

Oh 

t 

21 

(t \Y 

4 

\j yn 

[R 

\ 

J 

aby UN 

BN 

£5) 

A 

Wh 

\y 

PO

Page 4

sic <frPercont-quatified agricultural exemption granted by assessor (Enter 0 if exemption 

Percent qualified agriculiural exemption requested by owner {Enter 100 if full 

Very 

2/12 

2,43 

Michigan Department of Treasury 

8 (Rev. 

12:25) 

Petition to Board of Review 

L-4035 

This form is Issued under the authority of P.A. 206 of 1893. as amended, Filing is voluntary; however. you may not appeal to the Michigan Tex Tribunal unless you first protest 

to tne Board of Review, except when the property is classified as commercial real. industrial rea), or developmental real. You may nol appeal property classification lo the State 

Tax Commission unless you firs! protest lo the Board of Review. 

TO BE COMPLETED BY OWNER OR OWNER'S AGENT 

Owner's Name: Ni Print or 

A 

ha 

“Bheryl 

Township or Oty! 

County 

B 

| 

Year of Appeal 

Village of po Sonilat 

Santac 

202 

, illage 

¢ protests the assessed value and/or the tentative taxable value andlor the property classification and/or the qualified 

agricultural property exemption of the following described property: 

Property identiied (Parcel code required, Prapery address and legal description optional.) 

Toreel #212 210-000 - 124-00 

"1249 Eire ST, Port Soniloc, MI 48469 

Petitioner's Name {if Other than Owner, Please Print or Type) 

[EE 

Protested Item: 

Xx Assessed Value 

Xx] Tentative 

1 Taxable Status 0 Classification 

| Qualified Agricultural 

Taxable Value 

{exemption) 

Property Exemption 

1, PROTEST OF ASSESSMENT 

Complete this section fora protest of assessed value, including assessed value changes associated with exempt stalus and denied or late filed 

‘personal properly forms. 

$y Value 

Owner's 

Estimate of True Cash Value (Market Value) 

Z, 800. 

228,000 

2. PROTEST OF TAXABLE VALUE 

Complete this section for a protest of Taxable Value. 

Reason: 

0 Value of Losses 

Value of Additions 

0 Povérly Exemption 

Od Uncapping % 

T3 PROTEST 

OF CLASSIFICATION 

Complete this section for a request to change the classification. The Board of Review must make their decision regarding classification in accordance 

with Section 211.34¢ of the Michigan Compiled Laws. The Board of Review shall not be influenced by the effect that a particular classification has on 

Ihat property's slatus as a homeowner's principal residence or qualified agriculiural property.) 

Classification of property on this year's assessment roll 

Classification should be {check one of the following): 

’ [7 Agricultural 

Il Industrial 

0 Timber Cutover 

I] Utility (Personal Property Only) 

[} Commercial 

X Residential 

0 Developmental 

4. PROTEST OF EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY 

If the assessor has denied or changed the percentage of the exemplion from the 18 mills of local school operating tax for qualified agricultural proper- 

ty. the owner may appeal this action to the March Board of Review. THE BOARD OF REVIEW HAS NO AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER OR ACT UPON 

THE EXEMPTION FROM THE 18 SCHOOL OPERATING MILLS FOR HOMEOWNER'S PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE PROPERTIES.) 

denied} 

exemption requested) 

REASON FOR PROTEST 

State reason(s) for protest of assessed value and/or Ihe tentative taxable value andlor taxable status

Page 5

'

Page 6

202

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUL 18 2026 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ~~ 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

July 

Dates July 

94, 2025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL REFUND REQUEST 

Payee Name: 

Snery 

Saliba 

Payee Address: M249 ER/e 

SC 

MTT Docket No: 2b- 002 2.517 

Amount of Refund Requested: $ 250.00 

Reason for Refund: 

[OFiling/Motion Fee Overpaid 

ODuplicate Docket 

tH{other ni § 

. 

; 

court he whole EAT) 

Payment Information: 

Docket Lookup Line # of Payment 

Date of Payment: 

¢ [4 N€. 

qth 202, 

ene 

TD 

[III - Listy Sul Loni 

Validation/Confirmation #: 

Requestor’s Signature: 

For Tribunal Use Only: 

Computation of Refund Amount: 

Amount paid: 

$ 

Granted: 

[1] 

Amount Due: 

$ 

Denied: 

[J 

Amount Refunded: 

$ 

Prepared by: 

Date:

Page 2

CEE 

OE 

EO 

OE Oe 

OY 

Shary 1. Saliba 

124 R———— ™ 

YOO 

OLS 

PORT GANTLAC, MT. #84 £9. aa 

Docket 2 

~ 022577 

A {A 

RSA 

Bayt 

fre! #212 - "270 o0- AT (28-005) 

LW 

2 S| | 

unal 

~ POBOX ~ 

30232 

Lansi, MI 4399

Page 3

— 

Se 

= 

a 

i 

SEV 

Wi 

ANY 

Bw 

WA #22 #0 

Es 

—_ 

| Ae 

AA 

dd 

rw 

PR) 

yr - 

/4 

ARE the 

/U 

ON 

| 

Bahl 

A 

== 

== 

om 

“ 

\5, 

IB 

y 

Oo LU tolue. 

Loerg 

) 

py 

a. 

aR 

A 

1 

$F) 

XZ 

fl 

78 

or? 

AA | 

1A 

—— 

cf 

EE 

SE. 

of 

thy 

NE 

fre fran 

OCs 

I 

Jit 

4 

[I 

[ 

Vi 

— 

ESN 

PENN 

Fis 

Bl 

, 

An 

0 

IE 

IE 

2595 

i 

a 

ee 

V(r 

il 

=————— 

od 

— 

yr 

oy 

Ed oa 

sD 

EE 

wl 

\ 

1 

Lui 

IS) 

dl 

BBY: 

‘4 

i) 

ih 

== 

Vi 

AN 

\ 

_ 

El 

| 3 U5) 

3 

4 

= 

Ak 

a) 

Faget 

EE 

EE 

>) 

[VY 

al 

PR) 

boo 

43 

hy 

PN 

= 

et 

===3 

tw 

\, 

9 

7a Bh, 

TN 

el 

VN 

W 

BR 

RAN 

IA 

ey 

Po.) 

hd 

\ 

hl): yo 

31) 

3 

RY 

— 

ON 

Wad 

i 

oo 

JE 

JK 

so 

1a 

ies 

1) 

\ 

—— 

— 

= 

_— 

—_— 

Wy 

Wy 

— 

(y 

Q 

bY 

R 

A 

Oh 

t 

21 

(t \Y 

4 

\j yn 

[R 

\ 

J 

aby UN 

BN 

£5) 

A 

Wh 

\y 

PO

Page 4

Sheryl 

Saliba 

T7249 

Erie ST 

= 

* 

“+ 

METROPLEX.MI 480 

Bort Sani loe 

MT 48469 

11 3UL 2026 

PM 15L 

] 

HH 

[lis 

gl Tox Tribunal 

oz 

£1 nr 

30232. 

Ww 

Poneosy 

oni MT 48907 

sedi yee fpf 

ne digdeip) 

Deckert Ils 002257 

SEES

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

Confirmation # 26060988805516

250.00

Erica Mitchell 9/11/26

Line 1

0

X

0

September 14, 2026

Samantha MS Welton

RECEIVED 

JUL 18 2026 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ~~ 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

July 

Dates July 

94, 2025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL REFUND REQUEST 

Payee Name: 

Snery 

Saliba 

Payee Address: M249 ER/e 

SC 

MTT Docket No: 2b- 002 2.517 

Amount of Refund Requested: $ 250.00 

Reason for Refund: 

[OFiling/Motion Fee Overpaid 

ODuplicate Docket 

tH{other ni § 

. 

; 

court he whole EAT) 

Payment Information: 

Docket Lookup Line # of Payment 

Line 1 

Date of Payment: 

¢ [4 N€. 

qth 202, 

ene TD [III - 

Liat 

| amd Loni 

Validation/Confirmation #: 

Requestor’s Signature: 

Confirmation # 26060988805516 

For Tribunal Use Only: 

Computation of Refund Amount: 

Amount paid: 

$ 

250.00 

Granted: 

[1] 

Amount Due: 

$ 

© 

Denied: 

KI 

Amount Refunded: 

$_0 

Prepared by:__ 

Erica Mitchell 

Date: 

9/11/26

Page 2

CEE 

OE 

EO 

OE Oe 

OY 

Shary 1. Saliba 

124 R———— ™ 

YOO 

OLS 

PORT GANTLAC, MT. #84 £9. aa 

Docket 2 

~ 022577 

A {A 

RSA 

Bayt 

fre! #212 - "270 o0- AT (28-005) 

LW 

2 S| | 

unal 

~ POBOX ~ 

30232 

Lansi, MI 4399

Page 3

— 

Se 

= 

a 

i 

SEV 

Wi 

ANY 

Bw 

WA #22 #0 

Es 

—_ 

| Ae 

AA 

dd 

rw 

PR) 

yr - 

/4 

ARE the 

/U 

ON 

| 

Bahl 

A 

== 

== 

om 

“ 

\5, 

IB 

y 

Oo LU tolue. 

Loerg 

) 

py 

a. 

aR 

A 

1 

$F) 

XZ 

fl 

78 

or? 

AA | 

1A 

—— 

cf 

EE 

SE. 

of 

thy 

NE 

fre fran 

OCs 

I 

Jit 

4 

[I 

[ 

Vi 

— 

ESN 

PENN 

Fis 

Bl 

, 

An 

0 

IE 

IE 

2595 

i 

a 

ee 

V(r 

il 

=————— 

od 

— 

yr 

oy 

Ed oa 

sD 

EE 

wl 

\ 

1 

Lui 

IS) 

dl 

BBY: 

‘4 

i) 

ih 

== 

Vi 

AN 

\ 

_ 

El 

| 3 U5) 

3 

4 

= 

Ak 

a) 

Faget 

EE 

EE 

>) 

[VY 

al 

PR) 

boo 

43 

hy 

PN 

= 

et 

===3 

tw 

\, 

9 

7a Bh, 

TN 

el 

VN 

W 

BR 

RAN 

IA 

ey 

Po.) 

hd 

\ 

hl): yo 

31) 

3 

RY 

— 

ON 

Wad 

i 

oo 

JE 

JK 

so 

1a 

ies 

1) 

\ 

—— 

— 

= 

_— 

—_— 

Wy 

Wy 

— 

(y 

Q 

bY 

R 

A 

Oh 

t 

21 

(t \Y 

4 

\j yn 

[R 

\ 

J 

aby UN 

BN 

£5) 

A 

Wh 

\y 

PO

Page 4

Sheryl 

Saliba 

T7249 

Erie ST 

= 

* 

“+ 

METROPLEX.MI 480 

Bort Sani loe 

MT 48469 

11 3UL 2026 

PM 15L 

] 

HH 

[lis 

gl Tox Tribunal 

oz 

£1 nr 

30232. 

Ww 

Poneosy 

oni MT 48907 

sedi yee fpf 

ne digdeip) 

Deckert Ils 002257 

SEES

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Sheryl L Saliba,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-002257

County Of Sanilac,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner filed an Entire Tribunal case information sheet and paid a filing fee. Petitioner 

is required to file a petition and pay the required filing fee to initiate an appeal with the 

Tribunal. See TTR 225 and MCL 205.735a. Because a petition was not filed, the 

appeal is not properly pending. As such, Petitioner must file a petition within 14 days of 

the entry of this order. The petition shall note the docket number assigned by the 

Tribunal and if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed on the assigned 

docket number as an “amended petition.”

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

Entered: September 11, 2026

1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-002257

Page 2 of 2

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Individual 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

SHERYL

M.I.

L

Last Name/Company Name

SALIBA

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

1910 S LAKESHORE ROAD

City or Town

Carsonville

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48419

Telephone Number

8104348433

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

wolf.s411@yahoo.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

7249 ERIE ST

PORT SANILAC

Michigan

48469

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

County Of Sanilac (SANILAC) 

County

Sanilac

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

212-270-000-124-00

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Residential (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

122300

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

122300

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

220000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

110000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ SHERYL SALIBA

Payment Information

Amount: 250

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26060988805516

Supporting Waiver Documents:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Sheryl L Saliba, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 26-002257

County Of Sanilac, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: September 11, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Individual 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

SHERYL

M.I.

L

Last Name/Company Name

SALIBA

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

1910 S LAKESHORE ROAD

City or Town

Carsonville

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48419

Telephone Number

8104348433

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

wolf.s411@yahoo.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

7249 ERIE ST

PORT SANILAC

Michigan

48469

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

County Of Sanilac (SANILAC) 

County

Sanilac

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

212-270-000-124-00

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Residential (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

122300

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

122300

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

220000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

110000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ SHERYL SALIBA

Payment Information

Amount: 250

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26060988805516

Supporting Waiver Documents:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.