Robert R Campion Petitioner V Township Of Richfield Respondent

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Robert R Campion,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-002249

Township Of Richfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an 

appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan 

Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan 

Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal 

settlement conference process.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-002249

Page 2 of 4

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or 

email taxtrib@michigan.gov.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: 

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

Robert R Campion

47938 Ben Franklin Dr

Shelby Township , MI 48315

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Robert R Campion,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-002249

Township Of Richfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement

Page 5

MTT

Page 6

STATE

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

LET, 

A 

Ga 

JUL 

0.7 2006 

UgEvi 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

. GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ~~ MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / UNCAPPING 

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-002249 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

Unit of Government 

Township of Richfield 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

PO Box 128 

City or Town: 

State: 

Zip Code: 

Saint Helen 

Mi 

48656 

Telephone Nimber 

080) 389 4994 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MYT to send all correspondence via email): 

assessor@richfieldtownship.com 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

1 

First Name: 

Ml: 

Last Name: 

Julie 

A 

Tatro 

Firm Name (if any): 

Mailing Address {No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

PO Box 128 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZiP Code: 

Saint Helen 

Mi 

48656 

Teese 

mit 989 389 4994 ext 102 

Emall Address (do not enter untess you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

assessor@richfieldtownship.com 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Attacha 

separate sheet if necessary. 

(m} Yes 

0 No 

v 

Not Applicable 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more for all tax years at issue? 

[3 Yes 

No

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

Petitioner is appealing assessments and the uncapping of taxable value for prior tax 

years, and the Tribunal has no authority over those years, as the petition was not timely 

led. 

Being no assessment or taxable value appeal has been included for the 2026 year 

| 

respectfully request dismissal of this docket. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [74] Yes 

O No 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

March 

0 July 

O December 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [Hl] Yes 

[0] No 

If yes, cite the Board's authority. 

Was the assessment at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? Oves 

WAno 

If yes, explain 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

OvYes 

Mno 

If so, what is the issue date? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE 

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? 

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? 

The notice of uncapping of the 2025 taxable value was mailed on February 21, 2025. (copy included) under MCL 211.27a(6). 

Section 6: Valuation Information use the muttipte parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

P. 

| 

Number: 

ereciiumber 72-010-600-030-0000 

Classification of Property: 

~~ Real 

Personal [J (check one) 

Agricultural 

0 

Commercial 

0 

Industrial 

J 

Residential @ 

 Timber-Cutover 

0 

Developmental 

0 

Utility 

0 

(check one) 

Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review:

Page 3

Michigan Department of Treasury, 

1019 (Rev. 10-25) 

THIS 

IS NOT A TAX BILL 

L-4400 

Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification 

This form is issued under the authority of Public Act 206 of 1893, Sec. 211.24c and Sec.211.34c, as amended. This is a model assessment notice to be used by the local assessor. 

FROM RICHFIELD TOWNSHIP 

1410 N ST HELEN RD 

PO BOX 128 

ST HELEN MI 48656 

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION 

PARCEL NUMBER: 

72-010-600-030-0000 

PROPERTY ADDRESS: 

9111 TIPPEDY DRIVE 

SAINT HELEN, MI 48656 

SCHOOL DISTRICT CODE: 

~~ 72010 

OWNER'S NAME & ADDRESS/PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

CAMPION ROBERT R JR & CAMPION LORI 

EXEMPTIONS 

% Exempt As "Homeowners Principal Residence": 

.00% 

47938 BEN FRANKLIN DR 

% Exempt 

As "Qualified Agricultural Property": 

.00% 

SHELBY TOWNSHIP MI 48315 

% Exempt 

As "MBT Industrial Personal": 

.00% 

9% Exempt As "MBT Commercial Personal": 

.00% 

Exempt As "Disabled Veteran or Surviving 

Spouse”: 

O Yes 

No 

Exempt 

As "Qualified Forest Property": 

O Yes 

[X] 

No 

Exempt 

As "Development Property": 

O Yes 

No 

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 

LOT 30 TIPPEDY BEACH 

ACCORDING TO MCL 211.34c THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 

401 

Residential 

PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION IF DIFFERENT: 

401 

Residential 

The change in taxable value will increase/decrease your tax bill 

PRIOR AMOUNT 

CURRENT TENTATIVE 

CHANCE oo 

for the 2025 

year by approximately: $12935 

YEAR: 

2024 

AUOUNTYEAR: suas | 

CURRENT YEAR 

1. TAXABLE VALUE: 

210,874 

406,000 

195,126 

2. ASSESSED VALUE: 

376,400 

406,000 

29,600 

3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 

1.000 

4. STATE EQUAL 

? 

29,600 

6. Assessor Change Reason(s): 

Market Adjustment 

The 2026 Inflation rate Multiplier is: 1.027 

Questions regarding the Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification may be directed to the Following: 

Name: 

JULIE A TATRO 

Telephone Number: 

(989) 389-4994 

6 

Email Address: 

ASSESSOR@RICHFIELDTOWNSHIP.COM 

March Board of Review Appeal Information. The Board of Review will meet at the following dates and times: 

THE BOARD OF REVIEW WILL MEET ON MONDAY MARCH 10TH FROM 9 AM - 3 PM & TUESDAY MARCH 11TH FROM 3 PM - 9 

PM FOR THE PURPOSE OF HEARING ASSESSMENT APPEALS AT 1410 N SAINT HELEN RD SAINT HELEN MI 48656. YOU MAY 

APPEAL IN WRITING BY MAIL OR EMAIL. SEND YOUR L-4035 AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION TO: RICHFIELD

Page 4

06/30/2026 09:47 

aM 

2026 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION 

FROM 

R 

RICHFIELD TOWNSHIP 

1410 N ST HELEN RD 

POBOX 128 

ST HELEN MI 48656 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: (Parcel Code required. Property address 

and legal description

Page 5

-

Page 6

615.

Page 7

da

Page 8

Pri

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

MAY 06 2026 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / UNCAPPING 

Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other 

Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of 

Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. 

If you do not submit 

this document, you may be held in 

default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First Name 

Ml 

Last Name/Company Name 

Robert 

R 

Campion 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

47938 Ben Franklin Dr. 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Shelby Township 

MI 

48315 

Teleph 

elephone Number pas 

884-1 788 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

ML 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

How many parcels are you 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

appealing? 

Yes* 

No** 

1 

**|f No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel 

Property Address (No., Street) 

9111 Tippedy Dr. 

City or Town 

County 

State 

ZIP Code 

Saint Helen 

Rosscommon 

Mi 

48656

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

[A True Cash and Taxable Value 

[J Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[| Uncapping of Taxable Value 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

[Assessment Appeal 

~ 9111 Tippedy Dr., St. Helen, MI 

The assessed value of 9411 Tippedy Dr has increased from $205,900 in 2019 fo $482,200 in 2026, representing a 134% increase over six years. Marked (outpaced) increases 

of $70,800 or +29% assessed value in 2023, 24% above that year's 1.05 inflation multiplier, and $63,800 or +20% assessed value in 2024, 15% above the year's 1.05 inflation 

multiplier. 

While property values in the area have risen, the increase applied to this property significantly exceeds the growth of comparable homes on Tippedy Drive. Nearby properties 

experienced increases generally ranging from 43% to 81% over comparable periods, substantially lower than the nearly 134% increase applied to this property. 

Examples of comparable properties over the same timeline include: 

- 9131 Tippedy Dr: +45.6% increase 

- 9171 Tippedy Dr: +59.3% increase 

-9191 Tippedy Dr: +51.6% increase 

- 9219 Tippedy Dr: +43.0% increase 

These homes are similarly situated lakefront properties in the same immediate neighborhood. No major structural additions, renovations, or material improvements have been 

made to 9111 Tippedy Dr (since 2017) that would juslify an assessment increase substantially greater than the surrounding properties. Because the assessment growth for this 

property materially outpaces the neighborhood trend, the current assessed value does not reflect uniform and equitable assessment practices. 

We purchased the home in October 2024 at $602,000 and it subsequently uncapped in 2025. The resulting uncapping was significantly higher than the purchase price as a 

aresult of the previous assessed value increases. Had the property followed market set inflation multipliers the uncapping would have set very near the purchase price. 

Requested Adjustment 

To align this property with the prevailing neighborhood growth pattern, a revised assessed value in the range of $316,000 ~ $320,000 would more accurately reflect the 

proportional increases (approx. 50% + 2.7% annual increase in 2026) applied to comparable properties on Tippedy Drive. This adjustment would maintain consistency with 

surrounding assessments while still recognizing the general appreciation of lakefront properties in the area, 

Thank youl 

Robert & Lori Campion 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [v4] Yes 

O No 

If Yes, check which BOR you attended: [i] March 

[0] July 

OJ December 

If No, please check the applicable reason(s): 

O Not required to attend 

[| Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) 

O Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 

| Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping 

Other 

If you checked “other” above, explain:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information *use the muitipte parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

parcel tmberiz 5_010-600-030-0000 

Classification of Property: 

~~ Real [] 

Personal [4 (check one) 

Agricultural 

J 

Commercial (J 

Industrial 

J 

Residential Zl 

 Timber-Cutover 1 

Developmental 0 

~~ Utility [J (check one) 

Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established 

| Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: 

by the Board of Review: $4 82,200 

$416,962 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 

$640,000 

What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash 

What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed 

value by .5) 

$320,000 

assessed value) $31 6,000 

Fee Information 

Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at

Page 4

Row

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Robert R Campion,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-002249

Township Of Richfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: June 9, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

Robert R Campion

47938 Ben Franklin Dr

Shelby Township , MI 48315

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Robert R Campion,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-002249

Township Of Richfield,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: June 9, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

MAY 06 2026 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / UNCAPPING 

Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other 

Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of 

Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. 

If you do not submit 

this document, you may be held in 

default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First Name 

Ml 

Last Name/Company Name 

Robert 

R 

Campion 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

47938 Ben Franklin Dr. 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Shelby Township 

MI 

48315 

Teleph 

elephone Number pas 

884-1 788 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

ML 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

How many parcels are you 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

appealing? 

Yes* 

No** 

1 

**|f No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel 

Property Address (No., Street) 

9111 Tippedy Dr. 

City or Town 

County 

State 

ZIP Code 

Saint Helen 

Rosscommon 

Mi 

48656

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

[A True Cash and Taxable Value 

[J Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[| Uncapping of Taxable Value 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

[Assessment Appeal 

~ 9111 Tippedy Dr., St. Helen, MI 

The assessed value of 9411 Tippedy Dr has increased from $205,900 in 2019 fo $482,200 in 2026, representing a 134% increase over six years. Marked (outpaced) increases 

of $70,800 or +29% assessed value in 2023, 24% above that year's 1.05 inflation multiplier, and $63,800 or +20% assessed value in 2024, 15% above the year's 1.05 inflation 

multiplier. 

While property values in the area have risen, the increase applied to this property significantly exceeds the growth of comparable homes on Tippedy Drive. Nearby properties 

experienced increases generally ranging from 43% to 81% over comparable periods, substantially lower than the nearly 134% increase applied to this property. 

Examples of comparable properties over the same timeline include: 

- 9131 Tippedy Dr: +45.6% increase 

- 9171 Tippedy Dr: +59.3% increase 

-9191 Tippedy Dr: +51.6% increase 

- 9219 Tippedy Dr: +43.0% increase 

These homes are similarly situated lakefront properties in the same immediate neighborhood. No major structural additions, renovations, or material improvements have been 

made to 9111 Tippedy Dr (since 2017) that would juslify an assessment increase substantially greater than the surrounding properties. Because the assessment growth for this 

property materially outpaces the neighborhood trend, the current assessed value does not reflect uniform and equitable assessment practices. 

We purchased the home in October 2024 at $602,000 and it subsequently uncapped in 2025. The resulting uncapping was significantly higher than the purchase price as a 

aresult of the previous assessed value increases. Had the property followed market set inflation multipliers the uncapping would have set very near the purchase price. 

Requested Adjustment 

To align this property with the prevailing neighborhood growth pattern, a revised assessed value in the range of $316,000 ~ $320,000 would more accurately reflect the 

proportional increases (approx. 50% + 2.7% annual increase in 2026) applied to comparable properties on Tippedy Drive. This adjustment would maintain consistency with 

surrounding assessments while still recognizing the general appreciation of lakefront properties in the area, 

Thank youl 

Robert & Lori Campion 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [v4] Yes 

O No 

If Yes, check which BOR you attended: [i] March 

[0] July 

OJ December 

If No, please check the applicable reason(s): 

O Not required to attend 

[| Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) 

O Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 

| Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping 

Other 

If you checked “other” above, explain:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information *use the muitipte parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

parcel tmberiz 5_010-600-030-0000 

Classification of Property: 

~~ Real [] 

Personal [4 (check one) 

Agricultural 

J 

Commercial (J 

Industrial 

J 

Residential Zl 

 Timber-Cutover 1 

Developmental 0 

~~ Utility [J (check one) 

Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established 

| Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: 

by the Board of Review: $4 82,200 

$416,962 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 

$640,000 

What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash 

What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed 

value by .5) 

$320,000 

assessed value) $31 6,000 

Fee Information 

Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at

Page 4

Row

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.