Onp Owner LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Southfield, Respondent

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

ONP Owner LLC, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002777 

 

City Of Southfield, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioner was placed in 

default on July 22, 2025, because Petitioner failed to file a completed Entire Tribunal 

petition and failed to pay the required filing fee. On August 18, 2025, the Tribunal 

extended the time for Petitioner to cure the default by an additional 14 days, and they 

have failed to respond. Petitioner has not complied with either order, and the latter 

stated that “failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of the case . . .” 

and referenced Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury.1 In Grimm, the Michigan Court of Appeals 

summarized factors that the Tribunal should consider before imposing the sanction of 

dismissal. Those factors are: 

 

(1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of 

refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the 

opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) 

the degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) 

attempts to cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better 

serve the interests of justice.2 

 

Here, Petitioner’s failure to comply with multiple orders has established a history of 

deliberate delay. As a result, giving careful consideration to the factors involved and 

considering all options in determining what sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal 

finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser sanction would not be appropriate in 

light of Petitioner’s history of noncompliance in this case. 

 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

 

This order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 

 

 

1 Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

2 Id. at 149.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002777 

Page 2 of 2 

 

APPEAL RIGHTS 

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless 

the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a 

principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the 

decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, 

if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the 

opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to 

electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the 

motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral 

arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. 

 

Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the 

claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If 

the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal 

by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the 

record on appeal. There is no certification fee. 

 

 

Entered: September 19, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

kac 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

ONP Owner LLC, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002777 

 

City Of Southfield, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that it entered an order 

holding Petitioner in default on July 22, 2025, because Petitioner failed to file a 

completed Entire Tribunal petition, failed to pay the Entire Tribunal petition filing fee, 

and failed to pay the multiparcel filing fee.1 Petitioner is required to complete the 

petition, specifically paragraphs 16, 17, and 18, and pay the required filing fee for filing 

an Entire Tribunal petition and multiparcel form. Petitioner was required to cure the 

default within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet has failed to 

respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to 

cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its 

Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would 

justify the dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with this order.2 Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the 

default: (1) file a completed Entire Tribunal petition, (2) pay the required filing fee for the 

filing of the Entire Tribunal petition and the required filing fee for the filing of the 

multiparcel form, (3) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, and (4) pay the $50.00 fee 

required for the filing of the motion. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 

14 days of the entry of this order.3 

 

1 The order further stated, “Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being 

required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 

2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002777 

Page 2 of 2 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amended Entire Tribunal petition shall note the 

docket number assigned by the Tribunal in this case. Unfortunately, payment of the 

remaining filing fee due may not be made via e-filing. 

 

Information on Entire Tribunal petitions, Tribunal rules, and a filing fee calculator can be 

found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

 

Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of the case, as provided by 

TTR 237.4 

 

 

Entered: August 18, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

kac 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

 

 

4 See also MCL 205.732.

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

ONP Owner LLC,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002777

City Of Southfield,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner failed to properly complete the petition and has also failed to pay the full 

required fee for the filing of the petition. See TTR 233 and 223. As such, the appeal is 

not properly pending. See TTR 227. Petitioner must file an amended petition and pay 

the additional fee amount required for the filing of the petition within 14 days of the entry 

of this order. The petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal. 

Tribunal rules and information on Entire Tribunal petitions and filing fees can be found 

on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the payment may not be 

made via e-filing.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.i 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: July 22, 2025

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002777

Page 2 of 2

i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

oo 

JUN 08 2025 

obs 

i) 

z 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PHP Cuno Lic 

Petitioner(s) 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

MTT Docket No. 

7" 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No: 

fee Ave feed 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

The property identified above is _4-feal “personal. 

3. 

If more than one 

parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? “Yes __ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- 

contiguous parcel.) 

4. 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? Yes 

__ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as 

¢/ Fie (v4

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

8. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

The property or properties at issue are located in Oak tees 

County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

The assessment or assessments at issue were 

es; 

blished by the (applicable 

local governmental unity, 

Cs ¢</ ar 

A 

Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 

3olow 72k 

poh fod #<or— 

Lx 3ham fry, M3 F009 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? Yes 

_ 

No 

uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment 

the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 

Page 3 of 4 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior 

tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

Savible 

voles fowtrem Hy ome

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 

Page 4 of 4 

Signature of Pears Aypsized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

“le 

4 hg hrren 

Email Address: 

gale. eOalrygeda. yal sid) 

Mailing 

Address: 

0207 Te foo 

ce gh 

VZ4 pz z0 J 

Lous Abipr Lived], MEG fe? 

Telephone Number: 

z98 CY6e5 77 

Date: 

& Jo ferry

Page 5

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

ree 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

OUP Quer LL 

Petitioner, 

Cyr Soiily 

Respondent. 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

MTT Docket No. 

MULTIPLE PARCEL PETITION FORM __ OF ___ 

1. 

The classification of the property identified herein as established by 

Respondent's Board of Review is: 

Tax Year 

Parcel Number 

Real/Personal 

Classification 

202 

26-72-8(=078~ [| erm / 

2¢) 

does 

76-Z 4 (7— [cll 

flee, / 

207 

zoty/ 

[6-75— 0 (CO[~Lty | Priemes 

VAY 

zoty 

6-99 ~ 81-079 -2/|_foconys 

z</ 

2.0ty 

76 ~24(7-4v] oo] | ea] 

Use 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

2. 

The values for the property identified herein as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

| Parcel Number 

| True Cash Value 

| Assessed Value 

| Taxable Value 

cory 

|76-69-{1-0714 

Zts600 

281600 

et) 

G-pus7-t514ic 

[33,300 

lty.287 

2414 

%-59 -8107%-21p 

57 wo 

Ir 

zozy 

Tb-Go-R1-col-L if 

Yee 

ee

Page 6

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 2 

3. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified herein are: 

Tax Year | Parcel Number | True Cash Value | State Equalized Value | Taxable Value 

Zoer 

28 g170dy 

Z tbe 

CL pee 

24 

2h-it-47-417-072 

8150 

2724287 

Col 

(76 )7-8la0i eis 

5 pr 

57 wo 

Tz” 

TF 810002 

Joos 

Zro00 

LWT 

| Phpisrgesest 

§2/ tzo 

Piz, 12¢ 

4. 

The values in dispute for the property identified herein are: 

Tax Year 

Parcel Number 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

[felts Spo led [emad 

Laid oi? 

coy

Page 7

Onp lune ¢e< 

 30wo {LlE2ph 

US POSTAGE: P

FIRST-CLASS 

F) 

| 

fs 

ga 28035 

$ 00

Hui 

0006177384 

MAY

IN) 1chisan Fo Trikes! 

Gly. 0th SF 

Lansing, MF “Wiz 

ST 

isn 

RF 

LB TE 

TO RL 

Ll ER 

ET

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

ONP Owner LLC, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 25-002777

City Of Southfield, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: __Tribunal Clerk________

Entered: July 22, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

oo 

JUN 08 2025 

obs 

i) 

z 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PHP Cuno Lic 

Petitioner(s) 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

MTT Docket No. 

7" 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No: 

fee Ave feed 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

The property identified above is _4-feal “personal. 

3. 

If more than one 

parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? “Yes __ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- 

contiguous parcel.) 

4. 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? Yes 

__ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as 

¢/ Fie (v4

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

8. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

The property or properties at issue are located in Oak tees 

County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

The assessment or assessments at issue were 

es; 

blished by the (applicable 

local governmental unity, 

Cs ¢</ ar 

A 

Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 

3olow 72k 

poh fod #<or— 

Lx 3ham fry, M3 F009 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? Yes 

_ 

No 

uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment 

the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 

Page 3 of 4 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior 

tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

Savible 

voles fowtrem Hy ome

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 

Page 4 of 4 

Signature of Pears Aypsized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

“le 

4 hg hrren 

Email Address: 

gale. eOalrygeda. yal sid) 

Mailing 

Address: 

0207 Te foo 

ce gh 

VZ4 pz z0 J 

Lous Abipr Lived], MEG fe? 

Telephone Number: 

z98 CY6e5 77 

Date: 

& Jo ferry

Page 5

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

ree 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

OUP Quer LL 

Petitioner, 

Cyr Soiily 

Respondent. 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

MTT Docket No. 

MULTIPLE PARCEL PETITION FORM __ OF ___ 

1. 

The classification of the property identified herein as established by 

Respondent's Board of Review is: 

Tax Year 

Parcel Number 

Real/Personal 

Classification 

202 

26-72-8(=078~ [| erm / 

2¢) 

does 

76-Z 4 (7— [cll 

flee, / 

207 

zoty/ 

[6-75— 0 (CO[~Lty | Priemes 

VAY 

zoty 

6-99 ~ 81-079 -2/|_foconys 

z</ 

2.0ty 

76 ~24(7-4v] oo] | ea] 

Use 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

2. 

The values for the property identified herein as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

| Parcel Number 

| True Cash Value 

| Assessed Value 

| Taxable Value 

cory 

|76-69-{1-0714 

Zts600 

281600 

et) 

G-pus7-t514ic 

[33,300 

lty.287 

2414 

%-59 -8107%-21p 

57 wo 

Ir 

zozy 

Tb-Go-R1-col-L if 

Yee 

ee

Page 6

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 2 

3. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified herein are: 

Tax Year | Parcel Number | True Cash Value | State Equalized Value | Taxable Value 

Zoer 

28 g170dy 

Z tbe 

CL pee 

24 

2h-it-47-417-072 

8150 

2724287 

Col 

(76 )7-8la0i eis 

5 pr 

57 wo 

Tz” 

TF 810002 

Joos 

Zro00 

LWT 

| Phpisrgesest 

§2/ tzo 

Piz, 12¢ 

4. 

The values in dispute for the property identified herein are: 

Tax Year 

Parcel Number 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

[felts Spo led [emad 

Laid oi? 

coy

Page 7

Onp lune ¢e< 

 30wo {LlE2ph 

US POSTAGE: P

FIRST-CLASS 

F) 

| 

fs 

ga 28035 

$ 00

Hui 

0006177384 

MAY

IN) 1chisan Fo Trikes! 

Gly. 0th SF 

Lansing, MF “Wiz 

ST 

isn 

RF 

LB TE 

TO RL 

Ll ER 

ET

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.