ONP Owner LLC.pdf
Onp Owner LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Southfield, Respondent · 25-002777-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
RECEIVED oo JUN 08 2025 obs i) z MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PHP Cuno Lic Petitioner(s) , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MTT Docket No. 7" Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: fee Ave feed (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is _4-feal “personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? “Yes __ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? Yes __ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as ¢/ Fie (v4
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): The property or properties at issue are located in Oak tees County. The property or properties’ address is: The assessment or assessments at issue were es; blished by the (applicable local governmental unity, Cs ¢</ ar A Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 3olow 72k poh fod #<or— Lx 3ham fry, M3 F009 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? Yes _ No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): Savible voles fowtrem Hy ome
Page 4
MTT Docket No. Page 4 of 4 Signature of Pears Aypsized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: “le 4 hg hrren Email Address: gale. eOalrygeda. yal sid) Mailing Address: 0207 Te foo ce gh VZ4 pz z0 J Lous Abipr Lived], MEG fe? Telephone Number: z98 CY6e5 77 Date: & Jo ferry
Page 5
GRETCHEN WHITMER
GOVERNOR
ree
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
LANSING
OUP Quer LL
Petitioner,
Cyr Soiily
Respondent.
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
MTT Docket No.
MULTIPLE PARCEL PETITION FORM __ OF ___
1.
The classification of the property identified herein as established by
Respondent's Board of Review is:
Tax Year
Parcel Number
Real/Personal
Classification
202
26-72-8(=078~ [| erm /
2¢)
does
76-Z 4 (7— [cll
flee, /
207
zoty/
[6-75— 0 (CO[~Lty | Priemes
VAY
zoty
6-99 ~ 81-079 -2/|_foconys
z</
2.0ty
76 ~24(7-4v] oo] | ea]
Use
MARLON |. BROWN, DPA
DIRECTOR
2.
The values for the property identified herein as established by Respondent's
Board of Review are:
Tax Year
| Parcel Number
| True Cash Value
| Assessed Value
| Taxable Value
cory
|76-69-{1-0714
Zts600
281600
et)
G-pus7-t514ic
[33,300
lty.287
2414
%-59 -8107%-21p
57 wo
Ir
zozy
Tb-Go-R1-col-L if
Yee
eePage 6
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 2 3. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified herein are: Tax Year | Parcel Number | True Cash Value | State Equalized Value | Taxable Value Zoer 28 g170dy Z tbe CL pee 24 2h-it-47-417-072 8150 2724287 Col (76 )7-8la0i eis 5 pr 57 wo Tz” TF 810002 Joos Zro00 LWT | Phpisrgesest §2/ tzo Piz, 12¢ 4. The values in dispute for the property identified herein are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value [felts Spo led [emad Laid oi? coy
Page 7
Onp lune ¢e<
30wo {LlE2ph
US POSTAGE: P
FIRST-CLASS
F)
|
fs
ga 28035
$ 00
Hui
0006177384
MAY
IN) 1chisan Fo Trikes!
Gly. 0th SF
Lansing, MF “Wiz
ST
isn
RF
LB TE
TO RL
Ll ER
ET