Mansfield Storage LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Detroit, Respondent

Page 1

VALUATION DISCLOSURE FOR MTT DOCKET 25-002229 MANSFIELD STORAGE LLC v CITY OF DETROIT

12710 Adjacent to the North; showing that all the street facing structure of 12700 has been torn down

Note that inset has address on mailbox

enlarged

The commercial/industrial property at 12700 Mansfield Street in Detroit, MI sold for $430,000 on July 23, 2024.

Property Details

NOTE 12700 Buildings are nearly all torn down and the part that remains is just a shell

Type: Industrial / Commercial (six connected buildings)

76,464

 

Size: 30,337 square feet

5.62

 

Subject Value

430,000.00

 

Lot Size: 1.76 acres

Based on Sale of the Subject on 

Year Built: 1953

30,337.00

 

Sale Date: July 23, 2024

76,666

 

199,670

 

Bldg 1 Sec 1 is the only structure 

preserved even in part

14,547.50

 

Land value per square foot

2.60

 

Shaded in Blue in the building schematic above

Remaining Value for Building

230,330.00

 

Value per SF of Bldg not fully demolished

15.83

 

Comp 1

The commercial property at 14300 Meyers Road, Detroit, MI 48227 last sold for $400,000 in November 2025. [1, 2]

Property Overview

Property Type: Industrial / Commercial Building

Square Footage: ~15,778 sq. ft.

Year Built: 1951

Features: 20-foot ceilings, upgraded 3-phase electrical power, multiple loading bay doors, and sits on a 0.57-acre lot.

Land

Bldg

Total SP

Acres

0.57

SF/Acre

43,560

 

SF

24,829

 

15,778

 

Price/SF

2.58

 

21.29

 

64,045

 

335,955

 

400,000

 

Comp 2

The commercial property located at 14225 Schaefer Hwy, Detroit, MI 48227 most recently sold for $500,000 on January 12, 2026.

Prior to this transaction, the 43,848-square-foot industrial/specialty building had been listed on the market at various higher price points, ranging from $599,900 to $699,900.

Lot Size: 1.78 AC / ~77,537 SF (or 1.75 AC depending on the public record source)

Building Size: 54,048 SF

Land

Bldg

Total SP

Zoning: M4 (Industrial District)

SF

77,537

 

54,048

 

Year Built: 1950

Price/SF

2.58

 

5.55

 

200,000

 

300,000

 

500,000

 

Comp 3

The property at 12750 Mansfield St, Detroit, MI 48227 last sold for $240,000 on June 30, 2023.

Key facts about the property:

Type: Commercial / Residential parcel history

Last Sold: June 30, 2023, for $240,000

Lot Size: Approximately 54,450 sq ft (or listed across records with large commercial building footprints up to 13,700 sq ft

Land

Bldg

Total SP

240,000

 

SF

54,450

 

13700

Price/SF

2.57

 

7.30

 

140,000

 

100,000

 

240,000

 

Submitted by:

s:

Christopher Wylie

9/8/2026

Land Value per City 

supported by sales

This is the view of the 

remaining building from the 

North looking south across 

the land cleared with the 

demo of 12750 Mansfield

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Mansfield Storage LLC 

______, 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

 

v 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 

25-002229 

 

City of Detroit__________, 

Respondent(s) 

 

__X__ PETITIONER'S PROPERTY PREHEARING STATEMENT 

 

____ RESPONDENT'S PROPERTY PREHEARING STATEMENT 

 

Petitioner's representative:_____Christopher P. Wylie__Wylie Group LLC______ 

 

Respondent's representative:____Kevin C Richard, City of Detroit Law Dept____ 

 

I. 

VALUATION INFORMATION: 

 

A. The true cash value (TCV), assessed value (AV), and taxable value (TV) for each 

parcel and tax year at issue as established by the Board of Review (BOR): 

 

Parcel Number: ______22057119.003L____________________________ 

 

Year 

TCV 

AV 

TV 

2025 

750,000 

375,000 

375,000 

2026 

See below 

Petitioner Requests that 2026 be 

severed and administered under a 

new docket 

22057119.003L was Split on 11/25/2025 with 22057121.001, 22057120.005L 

into 22057120.006 

 

B. Your contentions of TCV, state equalized value (SEV), and TV for each parcel 

and tax year at issue: 

 

Parcel Number: _____22057119.003L _____________________________ 

 

Year 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

2025 

430,000 

215,000 

215,000 

2026 

TV Cap must 

apply 

0 on this parcel 

0 on this parcel

Page 2

MTT Docket No. __25-002229__________________ 

Page 2 of 5 

 

 

C. Amounts in dispute between the BOR values and your contentions of value for 

the tax year(s) at issue: 

 

Parcel Number: _____22057119.003L _____________ 

 

Year 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

2025 

320,000 

160,000 

160,000 

2026 

0 on this parcel 

0 on this parcel 

0 on this parcel 

 

 

 

 

 

II. 

TAX INFORMATION: 

 

A. Have taxes been paid for each property for each tax year at issue? 

_x_Yes ___ No 

 

III. 

FACTUAL STATEMENT OF CLAIMS: 

 

A. Describe any additions or losses for each property for each tax year at issue (by 

parcel number and tax year): 

_____Buildings mostly demolished_____________________ 

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________ 

 

B. Classification of each property for each tax year at issue (by parcel number 

 

Parcel No: 

Tax Year 

Classification 

2025 

Industrial 

2026 

Industrial 

 

C. Current use of each property for each tax year at issue(by parcel number): 

__2025 and 2026 vacant___________________________________________ 

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________ 

 

D. The use for which the property was designed, if different than above (by parcel 

number): 

________Industrial________________________________________________ 

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________ 

 

E. Contention of highest and best use for each property for each tax year

Page 3

MT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 25-002229

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No

Party Filing Document 

Petitioner

Files

Document Type: Prehearing Statement

Attachment File Name: 25 002229 Pet Prehearing Statement and Valuation Disclosure

Document Type: Valuation Disclosure

Attachment File Name: 12700 Mansfield Valuation Report

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner: 

MANSFIELD STORAGE, LLC 

v 

Respondent: CITY OF DETROIT 

 

MTT Docket No.: 25-002229 

 

Petitioner’s Prehearing Statement 

 

Respondent’s Prehearing Statement 

 

Petitioner’s representative: 

 

Christopher P. Wylie 

Wylie Group LLC 

17963 Maple Hill Court 

Northville, MI. 48168 

(248) 773-5091 

cpw@wyliegroup.us 

 

Respondent’s representative: 

Kevin C Richard (P43417) 

 

City of Detroit Law Department 

 

Coleman A Young Municipal Center 

 

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 500 

 

Detroit, Michigan 48226 

 

(313) 237-3061 

 

richkc@detroitmi.gov 

 

I. 

VALUATION INFORMATION: 

A. The true cash value (TCV), assessed value (AV), and taxable value (TV) for each 

parcel and tax year at issue as established by the Boards of Review: 

Parcel Number 

Year 

TCV 

AV 

TV 

22057119.003L 

2025 

$750,000 

$375,000 

$375,000 

22057119.003L 

2026 

$0 

$0 

$0 

 

B. Respondent’s contentions of TCV, state equalized value (SEV), and TV for each 

parcel and tax year at issue: 

Parcel Number 

Year 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

22057119.003L 

2025 

$750,000 

$375,000 

$375,000 

22057119.003L 

2026 

$0 

$0 

$0 

 

C. Petitioner’s contentions of TCV, SEV, and TV for each parcel and tax year at issue 

(per Petitioner’s Petition and Motions to Amend, if applicable): 

Parcel Number 

Year 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

22057119.003L 

2025 

$430,000 

$215,000 

$215,000 

22057119.003L 

2026 

$430,000 

$215,000 

$215,000

Page 2

MTT Docket No.: 25-002229 

Respondent’s Prehearing Statement, Page 2 of 4 

 

 

D. Amounts in dispute for the tax year(s) at issue: 

Parcel Number 

Year 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

22057119.003L 

2025 

$320,000 

$160,000 

$160,000 

22057119.003L 

2026 

$430,000 

$215,000 

$215,000 

 

I. 

TAX INFORMATION: 

A. Have taxes been paid for each property for each tax year at issue? 

☒ Yes 

☐ No 

III. 

FACTUAL STATEMENT OF CLAIMS: 

A. Describe any additions or losses for each property for each tax year at issue (by 

parcel number and tax year): 

 

Respondent is unaware of any additions or losses to the subject property for the tax 

year at issue. 

B. Classification of each property for each tax year at issue (by parcel number): 

 

 

22057119.003L 

2025 

industrial 

 

 

22057119.003L 

2026 

retired 

 

C. Current use of each property for each tax year at issue, if different than above (by 

parcel number): 

Not applicable. 

D. Contention of highest and best use for each property for each tax year at issue, if 

different than property’s current use for each tax year at issue (by parcel number): 

Not applicable. 

E. 

Your factual statement of claims in support of your contentions, including additions 

and losses, if any (i.e., what facts are you relying on in support of your claim or defense?): 

Respondent contends the proposed assessment values for the subject property do not 

exceed 50% of the true cash value for the at issue tax year. 

Additionally, the subject parcel no longer exists as of the 2026 tax year due to 

combination with other parcels and retirement of the parcel number. 

F. 

If non-uniformity of assessment is alleged, what evidence will you rely upon in 

support of your contentions? 

Respondent does not believe there are any valid non-uniformity of assessment issues.

Page 3

MTT Docket No.: 25-002229 

Respondent’s Prehearing Statement, Page 3 of 4

Page 4

M

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 25-002229

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No

Party Filing Document 

Respondent

Files

Document Type: Prehearing Statement

Attachment File Name: Mansfield Storage LLC MTT# 25- 002229 prehearing 

statement&valuation disclosure

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Mansfield Storage LLC, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002229 

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO AMEND

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that a motion 

has been filed requesting that the Tribunal permit Petitioner to amend the petition filed in 

this case to include the subsequent tax year. Respondent has not filed a response to the 

Motion to Amend. More importantly, the motion is timely under MCL 205.737 and 

205.735a and Petitioner has shown good cause to justify the granting of the motion. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Amend is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order only grants the relief indicated above and 

does not find as true any allegations of fact or provide any other relief requested by the 

motion.

By:___________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: June 30, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Mansfield Storage LLC, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002229 

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO AMEND

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that a motion 

has been filed requesting that the Tribunal permit Petitioner to amend the petition filed in 

this case to include the subsequent tax year. Respondent has not filed a response to the 

Motion to Amend. More importantly, the motion is timely under MCL 205.737 and 

205.735a and Petitioner has shown good cause to justify the granting of the motion. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Amend is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order only grants the relief indicated above and 

does not find as true any allegations of fact or provide any other relief requested by the 

motion.

By:___________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: June 30, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 ·

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

MANSFIELD STORAGE, LLC, 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

MOAHR Docket No. 25-002229 

 

v. 

CITY OF DETROIT, 

Respondent. 

 

WYLIE GROUP, LLC 

Christopher P. Wylie 

Representative for Petitioner 

17963 Maple Hill Court 

Northville, MI 48168 

(248) 773-5091 

cpw@wyliegroup.us 

CITY OF DETROIT LAW DEPARTMENT 

By: Kevin C. Richard (P43417) 

Attorney for Respondent 

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 500 

Detroit, Michigan 48226 

(313) 237-3061 

richkc@detroitmi.gov 

 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL MOTION TO AMEND 

TO ADD A SUBSEQUENT TAX YEAR 

 

1. 

Property Parcel No: 22057119.003L 

 

2. 

The parcel of property under appeal in this amendment is the same parcel as in the 

original petition. 

 

3. 

The classifications of the property or properties did not change for the tax year at issue in 

this amendment. 

 

4. 

This amendment involves issues relating to the (check all applicable): 

___X___the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

________the property or properties’ taxable values only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value are at issue, is there a dispute as 

to the value of an addition or loss? ___ No 

________uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment 

________the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation. 

5. 

The tax year(s) at issue are: ___2025 under the original petition and, pursuant to this 

motion, 2026.__________________________________

Page 2

Docket No. 25-002229 

MANSFIELD STORAGE, LLC v City of Detroit 

Entire Tribunal Motion to Amend to Add a Subsequent Year 2026 

Page 2 of 3 

 

 

6. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed in this amendment, list the separate 

and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the 

prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): _This Motion to Amend 

pertains only to the current tax year 

 

7. 

The values for the properties identified herein as established by Respondent’s Board of 

Review for the 2025 tax year are: 

 

Tax 

Year

Parcel Number 

True Cash 

Value

Assessed Value 

Taxable 

Value

2026

22057119.003L

$751,000

$375,500

375,500

 

8. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

 

Tax 

Year

Parcel Number 

True Cash 

Value

Assessed and State 

Equalized Value

Taxable 

Value

2026

22057119.003L

$430,000

$215,000

$215,000

 

9. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

 

Tax 

Year

Parcel Number 

True Cash 

Value

Assessed and State 

Equalized Value

Taxable 

Value

2026

22057119.003L

321,000

160,500

160,500

 

10. 

Petitioner requests the following relief in this amendment (attach additional page if 

necessary): ______________________________________________ 

 ____Petitioner requests that the Tribunal add the tax year 2026 to this Docket, 

pursuant to Section 37 of the Tax Tribunal Act and the same relief as otherwise 

requested in the original Petition. _____________ 

 

11. 

List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief 

requested in this amendment (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

____No final determination has been made by the Tribunal with regards to the 

property that is the subject of MTT Docket 25-00229.

Page 3

Docket No. 25-002229

Page 4

S

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

1 of 1

Docket #: 25-002229

Party Filing Document

Party Filing Document: 

 Petitioner

 Petitioner

 

 

If 'other', Identify: 

File

Document Type: 

 

 

fuFile:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906

NOTICE OF JANUARY 4 - 15, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER 

OF PROCEDURE

Mansfield Storage LLC,

Petitioner,

v

 

 

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

 MTT Docket No. 25-002229

Please be advised that 25-002229 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General 

Call commencing January 04, 2027. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be notified 

at least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not necessarily 

occur in the order in which the cases are listed below.

Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no 

valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” 

is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a 

party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the 

subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and 

data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241.

Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are 

public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket 

Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and 

prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for 

Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents 

covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a 

Protective Order will be published.

In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or 

redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to 

the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not 

responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing 

for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested 

person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII 

contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The 

Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages 

of the Tribunal’s website. 

Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s 

website for more information.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002229

Page 2 of 3

IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall:

a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties 

in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being 

filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure 

is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.).

b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures 

by September 8, 2026. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence 

unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though 

admissible) except

Page 3

MTT

Page 4

ST

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

1 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

MANSFIELD STORAGE, LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

v. 

MTT Docket No. 25-002229 

 

CITY OF DETROIT, 

 

Respondent. 

 

/ 

 

ANSWER 

 

RESPONDENT, CITY OF DETROIT, for its Answer to the Petition filed in this matter 

states as follows: 

1. Respondent admits. 

2. Respondent admits. 

3. Respondent admits. 

4. Respondent admits. 

5. Respondent admits. 

6. Respondent admits. 

7. No response required. 

 

8. Respondent admits. 

 

9. Respondent admits. 

 

10. Respondent admits. 

 

11. Respondent admits. 

 

12. Respondent admits. 

 

13. Respondent admits only that Petitioner’s instant Tax Tribunal appeal alleges issues

Page 2

2 

 

involving true cash and taxable values. Respondent denies that any such allegations have 

merit. 

14. Respondent admits. 

 

15. Respondent admits. 

 

16. Respondent denies as untrue. By way of explanation the true cash value is $751,000 

and the assessed and taxable values are $375,500. 

17. Respondent denies Petitioner’s contentions of value are correct or accurate. 

 

18. Based solely upon Petitioner’s unsubstantiated and erroneous contentions of value 

Respondent admits. 

19. Prayer for relief, no response required. 

 

20. Respondent denies as untrue. 

 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

Respondent further asserts that Petitioner’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by: 

 

1. Petitioner’s claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 

2. Petitioner has failed to state a claim for which relief may be granted. 

 

3. Petitioner lacks standing. 

 

WHEREFORE, Respondent City of Detroit respectfully requests that this Honorable 

Tribunal dismiss the petition in this matter and award costs and attorney fees. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

/s/ Kevin C. Richard 

Kevin C. Richard (P43417) 

Mary Beth Cobbs (P40080) 

City of Detroit Law Department 

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 500 

Detroit, Michigan 48226 

(313) 237-3061

Page 3

3 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

 

MANSFIELD STORAGE, LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

v. 

MTT Docket No. 25-002229 

 

CITY OF DETROIT, 

 

Respondent. 

 

/ 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

On November 25, 2025, I mailed by first class mail a copy of Respondent’s Answer in the instant 

matter to: 

 

Christopher Wylie 

Wylie Group LLC 

17963 Maple Hill Court 

Northville, Michigan 48168 

 

I declare that the statement above is true to the best of my information, knowledge and belief. 

 

 

/s/ Kevin C. Richard 

Kevin C. Richard (P43417) 

Senior Assistant Corporation Counsel 

City of Detroit Law Department 

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 500 

Dated:November 25, 2025 

Detroit, Michigan 48226

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-002229

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government

City of Detroit (Wayne)

Local Unit of Government/First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Kevin

M.I.

C

Last Name

Richard

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 500

City of Detroit Law Department

City or Town

Detroit

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48226

Telephone Number

313-237-3061

Fax Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

richkc@detroitmi.gov

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: 

Kevin C Richard

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Mansfield Storage LLC, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002229

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

was held in default on October 15, 2025, and the default has been timely cured. The 

documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on 

the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and 

clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE.

By_________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: November 7, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Manfield Storage LLC 

Petitioner, 

v 

City of Detroit, 

Respondent. 

WYLIE GROUP LLC 

Christopher P. Wylie 

Representative for Petitioner 

17963 Maple Hill Court 

Northville, Michigan 48168 

(248) 773-5091 (phone) 

cpw(@wyliegroup.us (email) 

MTT Docket No. 25-002229 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

NOW COMES Christopher Wylie, who states that on the 29th day of October, 2025, he served a copy 

of the enclosed Petition with the addition of the Docket Number to: 

1) Assessor (via certified mail, return receipt): 

4) County Equalization Dir (via first class): 

City Assessor 

2 Woodward Avenue - Suite 804 

Detroit, MI 48226 

Wayne County Equalization Director 

400 Monroe Street, Suite 600 

Detroit, MI 48226 

2) City Clerk or Township Supervisor/Clerk 

(via certified mail, return receipt requested): 

5) County Clerk (via first class mail): 

City Clerk 

2 Woodward Ave #200 

Detroit, MI 48226 

Wayne County Clerk 

2 Woodward Ave. 

Detroit, MI 48226 

3) School Board Secretary (via first class): 

6) State Treasurer (via first class mail) 

Secretary of the Board of Education 

3011 W Grand Blvd 

Detroit, MI 48202 

State Treasurer 

Treasury Building 

430 West Allegan Street 

Lansing, MI 48922 

by placing said documents in envelopes addressed to the above listed parties with all postage fully 

prepaid and by depositing with a representative for the United States Mail. 

Christopher Wylie

Page 2

Enclosed is your copy of the Proof of Service of Docket Number in a recently filed property tax 

appeal case. 

The Docket Number: 25-002229 has been added to the top of each page of the 

Petition, for your reference. 

Entire Tribunal petitions are filed with the Tribunal and not served, as required by MCL 

205.7354, until after the issuance of the Notice of Docket Number to Petitioner only. The 

Petitioner would then have 45 days after the issuance of the Notice of Docket Number to 

serve the petitions, which will note the docket number assigned to the case, and file a proof 

of service with the Tribunal indicating when the petitions were served. 

Feel free to contact me directly at (248) 773-5091 if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

CE ON 

Christopher P. Wylie 

Petitioner’s Co-Representative 

Copy to: 

All Parties Named on the following Proof of Service, with enclosures

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

_____________________________, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No. 

_____________________________, 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1.

Property Parcel No: _____________________________________________

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.)

2.

The property identified above is ___real ___personal.

3.

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties

contiguous? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non-

contiguous parcel.)

4.

Are all of the

Page 4

MTT

Page 5

M

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Mansfield Storage LLC,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002229

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner failed to file proof evidencing service of the petition. See TTR 227. The 

Tribunal finds that placing Petitioner in default, rather than dismissal of this case, may 

effectuate the efficient administration of this appeal. As such, Petitioner must submit 

the proof of service within 14 days of the entry of this order. Tribunal rules and 

information on Entire Tribunal petitions can be found on our website at 

www.michigan.gov/taxtrib.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.i 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: October 15, 2025

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002229

Page 2 of 6

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Mansfield Storage LLC,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002229

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed

Page 4

M

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

_____________________________, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No. 

_____________________________, 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1.

Property Parcel No: _____________________________________________

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.)

2.

The property identified above is ___real ___personal.

3.

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties

contiguous? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non-

contiguous parcel.)

4.

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property

under appeal? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under

appeal.)

5.

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary):

6.

The property identified above is classified as _________________________

7.

If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made

to Respondent’s ___ March ___ July ___December Board of Review.

Not applicable - one parcel only.

Not applicable - real property only.

Not applicable - real property only.

MANSFIELD STORAGE LLC

CITY OF DETROIT

 22057119.003L

X

INDUSTRIAL

Page 2

MTT Docket No. _________________ 

Page 2 of 4 

 

8. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

9. 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

10. 

The property or properties at issue are located in _______________County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

 

 

 

 

 

11. 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): ________________________________________ 

 

12. 

Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 

 

 

 

 

 

13. 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

________the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

________the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No 

________uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment 

________the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation 

 under MCL ______ 

 

14. 

The tax year(s) at issue are:

Page 3

MTT Docket No.

Page 4

MTT Docket

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Mansfield Storage LLC, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 25-002229

City of Detroit, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: __Tribunal Clerk________

Entered: August 14, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

_____________________________, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No. 

_____________________________, 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1.

Property Parcel No: _____________________________________________

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.)

2.

The property identified above is ___real ___personal.

3.

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties

contiguous? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non-

contiguous parcel.)

4.

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property

under appeal? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under

appeal.)

5.

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary):

6.

The property identified above is classified as _________________________

7.

If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made

to Respondent’s ___ March ___ July ___December Board of Review.

Not applicable - one parcel only.

Not applicable - real property only.

Not applicable - real property only.

MANSFIELD STORAGE LLC

CITY OF DETROIT

 22057119.003L

X

INDUSTRIAL

Page 2

MTT Docket No. _________________ 

Page 2 of 4 

 

8. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

9. 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

10. 

The property or properties at issue are located in _______________County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

 

 

 

 

 

11. 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): ________________________________________ 

 

12. 

Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 

 

 

 

 

 

13. 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

________the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

________the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No 

________uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment 

________the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation 

 under MCL ______ 

 

14. 

The tax year(s) at issue are:

Page 3

MTT Docket No.

Page 4

MTT Docket

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: Organization

First Name/Company Name

M.I.

Last Name

MANSFIELD STORAGE LLC

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

7871 CHUBB ROAD

City or Town

NORTHVILLE

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48168

Telephone Number

248-468-9200

Fax Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

lisa.ecaloconstruction@gmail.com

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Christopher

M.I.

P

Last Name

Wylie

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

17963 Maple Hill Court

City or Town

Northville

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48168

Telephone Number

248-773-5091

Fax Number

480-772-4073

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

cpw@wyliegroup.us

Section 5: Issue

Please designate one: 

Valuation – Fill out Sections 4, 5, & 6 below

Section 6: Subject Property Information

How many parcels are you 

appealing?1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

12700 MANSFIELD

Detroit

Michigan

48227

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City of Detroit (Wayne)

County

Wayne

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Section 7: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Values

Section 8: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

22057119.003L

Classification of Property: Real 

Industrial

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

375000

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

375000

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

430000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

215000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

215000

Section 9: Assessment Information

Type of Tax Assessment(s):

Assessment Number(s):

Check all that is being appealed: 

Check what action prompted this appeal:

If “other,” please explain:

Section 10: Special Assessment Information

Type of Special Assessment:

Did you protest the special assessment at the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? 

If Yes, what was the date of the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll?

If No, please explain:

Section 11: Classification Information

Parcel Number:

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

What do you believe is the property’s classification?

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

If improved property, how is the property currently being used?

If improved property, for what use was the property

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.