Madhav Adrian, LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Adrian Respondent
- Petitioner
- Madhav Adrian, LLC
- Respondent
- City Of Adrian
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-001032-TT
- Status
- Ready Sched Prehearing Date Certain
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Lenawee
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Prehearing General Call | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/16/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 09/20/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Proof of service of petition was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/24/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 07/13/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/13/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/15/2026 | $425.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF SEPTEMBER 16- 30, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF PROCEDURE Madhav Adrian, LLC, Petitioner, v City Of Adrian, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-001032 Please be advised that 26-001032 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General Call commencing September 16, 2027. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be notified at least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not necessarily occur in the order in which the cases are listed below. Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241. Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order will be published. In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of the Tribunal’s website. Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s website for more information.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-001032 Page 2 of 3 IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall: a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.). b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures by May 20, 2027. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing Statements by May 20, 2027. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in holding a party or parties in default. See TTR 237. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on May 20, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on September 16, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s valuation disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified on the opposing party’s Prehearing Statement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if this case is not scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference during the time frame indicated it may be scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference at any time subsequent to the completion date for this Prehearing General Call. Parties will, however, be notified in writing approximately one week before they are scheduled to appear. By:_____________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: October 16, 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 26-001032 Page 3 of 3 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF SEPTEMBER 16- 30, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF
Page 5
MTT
Page 6
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Madhav Adrians, LLC, Petitioner, v City of Adrian, Respondent. Docket No. 26-001032 _____________________________________________________________________________/ PETER ELLENSON (P47383) LAW OFFICE OF PETER ELLENSON, P.C. Attorney for Petitioner 30500 Northwestern Highway, Suite 500 Farmington Hills, MI 48334 (248) 406-4443 LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Attorneys for Respondent 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 (248) 731-3089 _____________________________________________________________________________/ ANSWER TO PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES ANSWER Respondent City of Adrian, by and through its attorneys, Hallahan & Associates, P.C., responds to the allegations made in Petitioner’s Petition as follows: 1. Respondent lacks the information necessary to respond to the allegations in Paragraph 1 and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 2. Respondent lacks the information necessary to respond to the allegations in Paragraph 2 and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 3. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 3. 4. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 4. 5. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 5.
Page 2
Entire Tribunal Property Tax Answer Page 2 of 5 6. Respondent acknowledges Petitioner’s beliefs as to the issues in this appeal, but denies that those issues have merit and also denies that Petitioner is entitled to any relief. 7. Respondent acknowledges Petitioner identification of the 2026 tax year as being at issue but denies an issue with the identified tax year. 8. Respondent neither admits nor denies the necessity of a protest to the Board of Review as the General Property Tax Act speaks for itself. 9. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value XA0 100 0296 02 $2,761,200 $1,380,600 $1,380,600 XA0 100 0296 05 $359,600 $179,800 $179,800 10. Respondent contends that the values for the property identified above are: Parcel Number True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value XA0 100 0296 02 $2,761,200 $1,380,600 $1,380,600 XA0 100 0296 05 $359,600 $179,800 $179,800 11. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Parcel Number True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value XA0 100 0296 02 $0 $0 $0 XA0 100 0296 05 $0 $0 $0 12. Petitioner is not entitled to the relief requested in Paragraph 12 for the reason that Petitioner’s amounts do not reflect the accurate valuations for this property. Furthermore, the assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values do not exceed permitted amounts, do not exceed the percentage for true cash value permitted by law, were correctly determined and are based upon correct application of proper principals, and the values and Respondent’s mode of assessment are non-discriminatory and constitutional. 13. Respondent denies the allegations in Paragraph 13 for the reason that the same are untrue. The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values do not exceed permitted amounts, do not exceed the percentage for true cash value permitted by law, were correctly determined and are based upon correct application of proper principals, and the values and Respondent’s mode of assessment are non-discriminatory and constitutional.
Page 3
Entire Tribunal Property Tax Answer Page 3 of 5 WHEREFORE, Respondent City of Adrian requests the Tribunal dismiss the Petition, affirm Respondent’s assessed and taxable values, subject to county and state equalization, and award Respondent its costs and attorney fees. HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. /s/ Laura M. Hallahan______________ LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) Attorneys for Respondent 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 Dated: , 2026 (248) 731-3089 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Respondent City of Adrian asserts the following affirmative defenses: 1. Petitioner fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. 2. The Tribunal is charged with finding a property’s true cash value to determine the property’s lawful assessment. Alhi Development Co v Orion Twp, 110 Mich App 764, 767 (1981). 3. Petitioner has the burden of establishing the property’s true cash value. See MCL 205.737(3) and Kern v Pontiac Twp, 93 Mich App 612 (1974). 4. Petitioner has failed to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error of law, discrimination, application of wrong principles, or illegality on the part of Respondent or its agents.
Page 4
Entire Tribunal Property Tax Answer Page 4 of 5 5. Petitioner has failed to allege that the mode and method of assessing the subject property fails to conform to the mode and method applied in the case of all other properties in Respondent’s taxing unit for the year in question. 6. Petitioner has failed to show that any factor other than fifty percent (50%) was applied to the true cash value of Petitioner’s property, as well as all others, to arrive at the respective assessments appearing on the roll, and also fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegations that the property’s taxable value is improper. 7. Petitioner asks the Tribunal to grant it preference by application of a self-chosen method of assessment contrary to the intent, purpose and law of this State. 8. Petitioner, in essence, asks the Tribunal to grant it an illegal preference by application of a method of assessment different from that employed in the assessment of other properties in Respondent’s taxing unit. 9. Petitioner, in essence, seeks by petition to challenge the
Page 5
Entir
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001032 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government City Of Adrian (LENAWEE) First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Laura M.I. M Last Name Halahan Firm Name (if any) Hallahan & Associates PC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1750 S. Telegraph Road Suite 202 City or Town Bloomfield Hills State Michigan ZIP Code 48302-2073 Telephone Number 2487313090 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Laura M. Hallahan /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR _____________________________, Petitioner(s) MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. _____________________________, Respondent(s) PROOF OF SERVICE FOR PROPERTY TAX PETITION *To be filed after the Tribunal issues the Notice of Docket Number* ___________________________________ states that on ___________________ he/she [Name of person serving/mailing petition] [date of service] served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter upon: [Provide name and address of the following entities] 1. Assessor (via certified mail): 2. City Clerk or Township Supervisor/Clerk (via certified mail): 3. County Equalization Director (via first class mail or personal service): 4. County Clerk (via first class mail or personal service): 5. Secretary of the local school board (via first class mail or personal service): 6. State Treasurer (via first class mail): Michigan Department of Treasury, State Treasurer 430 W. Allegan Lansing, MI 48922 [Signature of person who is serving/mailing copy] [Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy] MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Madhav Adrian, LLC 26-001032 City of Adrian Peter Ellenson August 24, 2026 City of Adrian Assessor, 135 E Maumee St, Adrian, MI 49221 City of Adrian Clerk, 135 E. Maumee St., Adrian, MI 49221 Lenawee County Equalization Director, 301 N Main St, Adrian, MI 49221 Lenawee County Clerk, 425 N Main St #301, Adrian, MI 49221 Secretary of the Board, Adrian School District, 785 Riverside Ave., Suite 1; Adrian, MI 49221 /s/ Peter Ellenson Peter Ellenson
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-001032 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition Attachment File Name: Madhav Adrian - POS 2026 ET Petition Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MADHAV ADRIAN, LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Dkt. No. CITY OF ADRIAN, Parcel Nos. XA0 100 0296 02 Respondent. and XA0 100 0296 05 ______________________________________/ PETER ELLENSON (P 47383) LAW OFFICE OF PETER ELLENSON, P.C. Attorney for Petitioner 30500 Northwestern Highway, Suite 500 Farmington Hills, MI 48334 248 406 4443 peter@ellensonlaw.com ______________________________________/ ENTIRE TRIBUNAL TAX PETITION – TY 2026 NOW COMES Petitioner, MADHAV ADRIAN, LLC, through its attorney, PETER ELLENSON, and states as follows in support of this Petition: 1. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to the property taxes for the following parcel numbers: XA0 100 0296 02 and XA0 100 0296 05, located at 1629 W Maumee Street, Adrian, MI 49221. 2. Petitioner’s principal office address is 1629 W Maumee St., Adrian, MI 49221. 3. Respondent City of Adrian assesses and collects the ad valorem property taxes associated with the subject parcels. 4. The subject properties are classified as commercial improved (201). 5. The subject properties are located in Lenawee County. 6. This appeal involves the properties’ true cash and taxable values. 7. The tax year at issue is 2026.
Page 2
8. No Board of Review protest was required or filed for the properties. 9. The 2026 values for the subject properties as established by the Respondent at its March 2026 Board of Review are: XA0 100 0296 02 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2,761,200 1,380,600 1,380,600 XA0 100 0296 05 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 359,600 179,800 179,800 10. Petitioner contends that the values for the subject property are: XA0 100 0296 02 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 XA0 100 0296 05 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 200,000 100,000 100,000 11. The values in dispute for the subject property are: XA0 100 0296 02 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 761,200 380,600 380,600 XA0 100 0296 05 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 159,600 79,800 79,800 12. Petitioner requests that this Honorable Tribunal order the assessing entity to correct its tax rolls to reflect taxable, assessed and state equalized values as indicated above (or on the attached supplement) to issue refunds as appropriate, and to pay interest and costs. 13. The basis for the requested relief is that the assessed and taxable values exceed 50% of the true cash value of the subject property.
Page 3
Respectfully submitted, /s/ Peter Ellenson _______________________________ Date: May 15, 2026 PETER ELLENSON (P 47383) Attorney for Petitioner 248 406 4443 peter@ellensonlaw.com
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Madhav Adrian, LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1629 W Maumee Street City or Town Adrian State Michigan ZIP Code 49221 Telephone Number 2487031134 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) peter@ellensonlaw.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Peter M.I. Last Name Ellenson Firm Name (if any) Law Office of Peter Ellenson, PC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 30500 Northwestern Highway Suite 500 City or Town Farmington Hills State Michigan ZIP Code 48334-3177 Telephone Number 2487031134 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) peter@ellensonlaw.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 2 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 1629 W Maumee Adrian
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 49221 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Adrian (LENAWEE) County Lenawee If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) Yes Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: XA0 100 0296 02 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 1380600 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 1380600 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 2000000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 1000000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 1000000 Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: XA0 100 0296 05 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 179800 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 179800 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 200000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 100000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 100000 Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Peter Ellenson Payment Information Amount: 425 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26051585616227 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Madhav Adrian, LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-001032 City Of Adrian, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: July 13, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
Peter Ellenson Law Office of Peter Ellenson, PC 30500 Northwestern Highway Suite 500 Farmington Hills , MI 48334
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MADHAV ADRIAN, LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Dkt. No. CITY OF ADRIAN, Parcel Nos. XA0 100 0296 02 Respondent. and XA0 100 0296 05 ______________________________________/ PETER ELLENSON (P 47383) LAW OFFICE OF PETER ELLENSON, P.C. Attorney for Petitioner 30500 Northwestern Highway, Suite 500 Farmington Hills, MI 48334 248 406 4443 peter@ellensonlaw.com ______________________________________/ ENTIRE TRIBUNAL TAX PETITION – TY 2026 NOW COMES Petitioner, MADHAV ADRIAN, LLC, through its attorney, PETER ELLENSON, and states as follows in support of this Petition: 1. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to the property taxes for the following parcel numbers: XA0 100 0296 02 and XA0 100 0296 05, located at 1629 W Maumee Street, Adrian, MI 49221. 2. Petitioner’s principal office address is 1629 W Maumee St., Adrian, MI 49221. 3. Respondent City of Adrian assesses and collects the ad valorem property taxes associated with the subject parcels. 4. The subject properties are classified as commercial improved (201). 5. The subject properties are located in Lenawee County. 6. This appeal involves the properties’ true cash and taxable values. 7. The tax year at issue is 2026.
Page 2
8. No Board of Review protest was required or filed for the properties. 9. The 2026 values for the subject properties as established by the Respondent at its March 2026 Board of Review are: XA0 100 0296 02 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2,761,200 1,380,600 1,380,600 XA0 100 0296 05 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 359,600 179,800 179,800 10. Petitioner contends that the values for the subject property are: XA0 100 0296 02 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 XA0 100 0296 05 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 200,000 100,000 100,000 11. The values in dispute for the subject property are: XA0 100 0296 02 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 761,200 380,600 380,600 XA0 100 0296 05 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 159,600 79,800 79,800 12. Petitioner requests that this Honorable Tribunal order the assessing entity to correct its tax rolls to reflect taxable, assessed and state equalized values as indicated above (or on the attached supplement) to issue refunds as appropriate, and to pay interest and costs. 13. The basis for the requested relief is that the assessed and taxable values exceed 50% of the true cash value of the subject property.
Page 3
Respectfully submitted, /s/ Peter Ellenson _______________________________ Date: May 15, 2026 PETER ELLENSON (P 47383) Attorney for Petitioner 248 406 4443 peter@ellensonlaw.com
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Madhav Adrian, LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1629 W Maumee Street City or Town Adrian State Michigan ZIP Code 49221 Telephone Number 2487031134 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) peter@ellensonlaw.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Peter M.I. Last Name Ellenson Firm Name (if any) Law Office of Peter Ellenson, PC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 30500 Northwestern Highway Suite 500 City or Town Farmington Hills State Michigan ZIP Code 48334-3177 Telephone Number 2487031134 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) peter@ellensonlaw.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 2 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 1629 W Maumee Adrian
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 49221 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Adrian (LENAWEE) County Lenawee If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) Yes Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: XA0 100 0296 02 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 1380600 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 1380600 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 2000000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 1000000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 1000000 Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: XA0 100 0296 05 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 179800 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 179800 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 200000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 100000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 100000 Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Peter Ellenson Payment Information Amount: 425 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26051585616227 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.