200 W Main LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Woodstock Respondent
- Petitioner
- 200 W Main LLC
- Respondent
- Township Of Woodstock
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-002532-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Lenawee
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Consent Judgment | Not recorded | 7 | 10/20/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | Order Setting Aside P Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/20/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | A Stipulation has been received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/15/2026 | $50.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Order Extending P's Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/24/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 09/08/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Order Holding Party in Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/25/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 07/01/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/01/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 04/16/2026 | $400.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 200 W Main LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 26-002532 Woodstock Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Marcus L. Abood ORDER SETTING ASIDE PETITIONER’S DEFAULT ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT CONSENT JUDGMENT On October 15, 2026, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment (Stipulation) agreeing to revise the subject property’s assessment for the 2026 tax year. The Tribunal has considered the Stipulation and finds that on August 25, 2026, Petitioner was placed in default for failing to file proof evidencing service of the petition. On September 8, 2026, Respondent filed an answer. On September 24, 2026, the Tribunal issued an order extending the time for Petitioner to cure its default. The parties have agreed to settle this case; the Tribunal cannot process the parties’ Stipulation as Petitioner’s default. The Tribunal shall accept the parties’ intentions with the Stipulation in place of further pleadings or documentation from Petitioner. In light of the parties’ willingness to settle this case, the Tribunal finds good cause to set aside Petitioner’s default. The Tribunal has reviewed the Stipulation and finds that it comports with the mandates of State law.1 As a result, the Tribunal shall enter the parties’ Stipulation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s default is SET ASIDE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise indicated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be 1 See MCL 211.27a.
Page 2
MOAHR Docket No. 26-002532 Page 2 of 2 corrected to reflect the property’s principal residence exemption for the tax years at issue within 20 days of entry of this Consent Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund within 28 days of the entry of this Consent Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall be without interest, as provided by MCL 211.7cc. It shall, however, include a proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and penalty and interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being refunded. This Consent Judgment resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. See docket look up for a copy of stipulation and for any possible refund paragraph. By /s/ Marcus L. Abood Entered: October 20, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 200 W Main LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 26-002532 Woodstock Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Marcus L. Abood ORDER SETTING ASIDE PETITIONER’S DEFAULT ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT CONSENT JUDGMENT On October 15, 2026, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment (Stipulation) agreeing to revise the subject property’s assessment for the 2026 tax year. The Tribunal has considered the Stipulation and finds that on August 25, 2026, Petitioner was placed in default for failing to file proof evidencing service of the petition. On September 8, 2026, Respondent filed an answer. On September 24, 2026, the Tribunal issued an order extending the time for Petitioner to cure its default. The parties have agreed to settle this case; the Tribunal cannot process the parties’ Stipulation as Petitioner’s default. The Tribunal shall accept the parties’ intentions with the Stipulation in place of further pleadings or documentation from Petitioner. In light of the parties’ willingness to settle this case, the Tribunal finds good cause to set aside Petitioner’s default. The Tribunal has reviewed the Stipulation and finds that it comports with the mandates of State law.1 As a result, the Tribunal shall enter the parties’ Stipulation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s default is SET ASIDE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise indicated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be 1 See MCL 211.27a.
Page 2
MOAHR Docket No. 26-002532 Page 2 of 2 corrected to reflect the property’s principal residence exemption for the tax years at issue within 20 days of entry of this Consent Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund within 28 days of the entry of this Consent Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall be without interest, as provided by MCL 211.7cc. It shall, however, include a proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and penalty and interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being refunded. This Consent Judgment resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. See docket look up for a copy of stipulation and for any possible refund paragraph. By /s/ Marcus L. Abood Entered: October 20, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 ______________________, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MOAHR Docket No. _______________ ______________________, Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT (VALUATION) 1. The subject property is in _________________________________ County. 2. Parcel Number: ____________________________________________. (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax year Assessed Value (AV) Taxable Value (TV) 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax year True Cash Value AV TV 5. If the stipulated TV does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable inflation rate multiplier, explain why (e.g., transfer of ownership, additions, losses, omitted property etc.) ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ 6. List any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of a Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment 200 W. Main LLC 26-002532-TT Township of Woodstock Lenawee WD1-003-6031-00 2026 $199,800 $199,800 2026 $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 The assessed value is being reduced by mutual stipulation between the assess and petitioner due to water damage and the overal disrepair of the property. These conditions negatively impact the property's condition and market value, warranting an adjutment to the assessed vale to more accurately reflect its condition. Docusign Envelope ID: 21747751-E6CD-8983-808B-3C5BD05E2C1F
Page 2
MOAHR Docket No. ___________ Page 2 of 2 of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ NOTE: The Stipulation MUST include ALL parcels and ALL tax years included in the appeal (including subsequent tax years on or after April 1 of each year for appeals pending in the Small Claims Division). The parties may agree, however, to withdraw the appeal of specific parcels and/or tax year(s). IF APPLICABLE, complete the following section(s). Otherwise, LEAVE BLANK. 7. The parties agree to the withdrawal of parcel number: __________________________________________. (If more than one parcel is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing all other parcels being withdrawn.) 8. The parties agree to the withdrawal of tax year(s) ____________________. Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: __________________________________________________________________ Printed Name:_______________________________________________________ Date: ______________________________________________________________ Signature of Respondent’s authorized representative: __________________________________________________________________ Printed Name:_______________________________________________________ Date: ______________________________________________________________ 26-002532-TT Raymond A. Oatman 10/13/2026 Frederick Lucas 10/13/2026 Docusign Envelope ID: 21747751-E6CD-8983-808B-3C5BD05E2C1F
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-002532 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Joint Files Document Type: Stip for Consent Judgment Attachment File Name: 2026.10.13 Stipulation for entry of consent EXECUTED Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 50.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 50.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 200 W Main LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 26-002532 Woodstock Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that it entered an order holding Petitioner in default on August 25, 2026, because Petitioner failed to file proof evidencing the service of the petition on the six parties in interest pursuant to TTR 227(6).1 Petitioner was required to cure the default by filing proof of service of the petition within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with this order.2 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the default: (1) file proof evidencing the service of the petition on the six parties in interest pursunat to TTR 227(6), (2) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, (3) pay the $50.00 fee required for the filing of the motion, and (4) file proof the motion was served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order.3 1 The order further stated, “Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002532 Page 2 of 2 Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of the case, as provided by TTR 237.4 Entered: September 24, 2026 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm kac PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 4 See also MCL 205.732.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR DIRECTOR LANSING ______________________, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. _____________ ______________________, Respondent. ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX ANSWER 1. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, state the parcel number for the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Answer Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. ___Admit ____Deny. If denied, the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition is ___ real ___ personal. 3. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, identify the contiguous and non-contiguous parcels by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 4. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, identify the parcel or parcels of personal property that are not located on a parcel of real property under appeal by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 5. ___Admit ___Deny. a. If denied, state when the personal property statements were filed, if at all: b. On what date did the March Board of Review commence: 6. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, state the classification of the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 200 W. Main LLC 26-002532-TT Township of Woodstock X X X
Page 2
________________________________________________________________ MTT Docket No. ______________ Page 2 of 4 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): ___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): ___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, state the facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, in what County are the property or properties located in and what is the address of the property or properties: ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, what is the applicable local governmental unit: ___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): If the property’s taxable value is at issue, was there an addition or loss for purposes of establishing the property’s taxable value for the tax year or years at issue? ___Yes ___No. 26-002532-TT X X X X X
Page 3
MTT Docket No. ______________ Page 3 of 4 14. ___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 15. ___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 17. Respondent contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value X X 2026 $399,600 $199,800 $199,800 2026 $399,600 $199,800 $199,800 2026 $324,600 $162,300 $162,000
Page 4
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ MTT Docket No. ______________ Page 4 of 4 19. ___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 20. ___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 21. List any separate and specific facts upon which Respondent relies to support every ground on which Respondent relies and also has the burden of proof (attach additional page if necessary): 22. List affirmative defenses and the separate and specific facts upon which Respondent relies in support of those affirmative defenses (attach additional page if necessary): Signature of Respondent’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Respondent: Printed Name of Respondent’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Respondent: Email Address: _________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: Telephone Number:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MTT DOCKET NO. 26-002532 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government Township Of Woodstock (LENAWEE) First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Frederick M.I. Last Name Lucas Firm Name (if any) Castleberry & Lucas Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 7577 US Highway 12 City or Town Onsted State Michigan ZIP Code 49265 Telephone Number 517-467-4000 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) fred@castleberrylucas.com Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Frederick Lucas /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 200 W Main LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-002532 Township Of Woodstock, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner failed to file proof evidencing service of the petition. See TTR 227. The Tribunal finds that placing Petitioner in default, rather than dismissal of this case, may effectuate the efficient administration of this appeal. As such, Petitioner must submit the proof of service within 14 days of the entry of this order. Tribunal rules and information on Entire Tribunal petitions can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: August 25, 2026 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002532 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
f0:4h06 20119407-1 04/29/26 Cri: 117 fut: $400.00 TO: RAYMOND A DATHAN TRUST STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR 200 W. Main LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. Township of Woodstock Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION (18 Property Parcel No: WD1-003-6031-00 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is X real ___personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___ Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___ Yes __ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as 201 (Commercial Improved)
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 18. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): The property or properties at issue are located in Lenawee County. The property or properties’ address is: 200 W. Main St, Addison MI 49220 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): Woodstock Township Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 8226 Acker Hwy, Hudson MI 49247 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): X the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? __ Yes __ No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or vears (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 $399,600 $199,800 $199,800 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 $75,000 $37,500 $37,500 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 $324,600 $162,300 $162,300 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): Petitioner believes the property's 2026 true cash value should be $75,000 due to the disrepair of the property in question.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. Page 4 of 4 La Signature of Petitioner's Authorized Representatiyé or, if none, Petitioner: yA [ 77 Zz c Printed Name of Petitiorier's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Raymond A. Oatman Email Address: number1butch2000@yahoo.com Mailing Address: 8226 Acker Hwy Hudson Mi 49247 Telephone Number; 734-320-4283 Date: 04/14/2026
Page 5
IT NN OA ‘O00 OR | STATE OF MICHIGAN Corporations Division Administrator LARA cscLicp- 700 - ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION - FILED mesos DOMESTIC LLC } i Entity #: 900168818 Filed Date: 2/20/2026 Ariicles of Organization Pursuant to the provisions of Act 23, Public Acts of 1993, the undersigned executes the following Articles: Article 1 - Michigan Limited Liability Company Name Michigan Limited Liability Company Name 200 W MAIN, LLC Article Il The purpose or purposes for which the limited liability company is formed is to engage in any activity within the purposes for which a limited liability company may be formed under the Limited Liability Company Act of Michigan. Article lI] Duration of the Company Perpetual / Ongoing Article IV The name of the resident agent at the registered office is: Agent Name RAYMOND A OATMAN The street address of the location of the registered office is: Street Address 8226 ACKER HWY HUDSON, MI 49247 X | certify the above individual/company has agreed to serve as the Resident Agent for service of process for this entity. Article V The Limited Liability Company will be managed by or under the authority of: Member(s) Article VI - (Optional, leave unchecked if not applicable) Unless otherwise provided by law or in an operating agreement, a person who is a member or manager, or both, of a
Page 6
A
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 200 W Main LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-002532 Township Of Woodstock, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: __Tribunal Clerk________ Entered: July 1, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 200 W Main LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-002532 Township Of Woodstock, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: __Tribunal Clerk________ Entered: July 1, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 200 W Main LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-002532 Township Of Woodstock, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
f0:4h06 20119407-1 04/29/26 Cri: 117 fut: $400.00 TO: RAYMOND A DATHAN TRUST STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR 200 W. Main LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. Township of Woodstock Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION (18 Property Parcel No: WD1-003-6031-00 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is X real ___personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___ Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___ Yes __ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as 201 (Commercial Improved)
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 18. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): The property or properties at issue are located in Lenawee County. The property or properties’ address is: 200 W. Main St, Addison MI 49220 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): Woodstock Township Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 8226 Acker Hwy, Hudson MI 49247 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): X the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? __ Yes __ No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or vears (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 $399,600 $199,800 $199,800 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 $75,000 $37,500 $37,500 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 $324,600 $162,300 $162,300 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): Petitioner believes the property's 2026 true cash value should be $75,000 due to the disrepair of the property in question.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. Page 4 of 4 La Signature of Petitioner's Authorized Representatiyé or, if none, Petitioner: yA [ 77 Zz c Printed Name of Petitiorier's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Raymond A. Oatman Email Address: number1butch2000@yahoo.com Mailing Address: 8226 Acker Hwy Hudson Mi 49247 Telephone Number; 734-320-4283 Date: 04/14/2026
Page 5
IT NN OA ‘O00 OR | STATE OF MICHIGAN Corporations Division Administrator LARA cscLicp- 700 - ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION - FILED mesos DOMESTIC LLC } i Entity #: 900168818 Filed Date: 2/20/2026 Ariicles of Organization Pursuant to the provisions of Act 23, Public Acts of 1993, the undersigned executes the following Articles: Article 1 - Michigan Limited Liability Company Name Michigan Limited Liability Company Name 200 W MAIN, LLC Article Il The purpose or purposes for which the limited liability company is formed is to engage in any activity within the purposes for which a limited liability company may be formed under the Limited Liability Company Act of Michigan. Article lI] Duration of the Company Perpetual / Ongoing Article IV The name of the resident agent at the registered office is: Agent Name RAYMOND A OATMAN The street address of the location of the registered office is: Street Address 8226 ACKER HWY HUDSON, MI 49247 X | certify the above individual/company has agreed to serve as the Resident Agent for service of process for this entity. Article V The Limited Liability Company will be managed by or under the authority of: Member(s) Article VI - (Optional, leave unchecked if not applicable) Unless otherwise provided by law or in an operating agreement, a person who is a member or manager, or both, of a
Page 6
A
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.