Julius J. Pawlicha, Petitioner V City Of Hazel Park, Respondent

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Julius J Pawlicha, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003598 

 

City of Hazel Park, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 

The Tribunal issued a Proposed Opinion and Judgment (POJ) on November 10, 

2025. The POJ states, in pertinent part, “[t]he parties have 20 days from the below 

‘Date Entered by Tribunal’ to notify the Tribunal and the opposing party in writing, by 

mail or by electronic filing, if they do not agree with the POJ and to state in writing why 

they do not agree with the POJ (i.e., exceptions).” 

 

Neither party filed exceptions to the POJ. 

 

The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) considered the testimony and evidence submitted 

and made specific findings of fact and conclusions of law. The ALJ’s determination that 

Petitioner did not meet their burden of going forward with the evidence is supported by 

the record in this case and applicable statutory authority. 

 

Given the above, the Tribunal adopts the POJ and finds that dismissal of this case is 

warranted.1 Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED. 

 

This Order resolves the last pending claim and closes this case. 

 

 

APPEAL RIGHTS 

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless 

 

1 See MCL 205.726.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003598 

Page 2 of 2 

 

the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a 

principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the 

decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, 

if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the 

opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to 

electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the 

motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral 

arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. 

 

Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the 

claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If 

the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal 

by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the 

record on appeal. There is no certification fee. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

Entered: December 11, 2025 

cs 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

 

Julius J Pawlicha, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003598 

 

 

City of Hazel Park, 

 

 

 

 

Case Type: Valuation 

 

Respondent. 

 

PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 

Personnel Presiding: 

 

 

Sean M. Mulchay, Administrative Law Judge 

Location of Hearing: 

 

 

Telephonic Hearing 

Hearing Held on: 

 

 

 

October 29, 2025 

Appearances on Behalf of Petitioner: 

Julius Pawlicha 

Appearances on Behalf of Respondent: Mark Lorkowski 

 

PROCEDURAL HISTORY 

 

Petitioner was required to protest the subject property’s assessment to the Board of 

Review (BOR). Petitioner protested the subject property’s assessment to the 2024 

March BOR. 

 

Petitioner filed a petition with the Tribunal on June 26, 2024, and Respondent filed an 

answer on October 16, 2024. 

 

The amount of the state equalized value (SEV) or taxable value (TV) in dispute, as set 

forth in the pleadings, for all tax years at issue is within the jurisdictional limits of the 

Small Claims Division.1 Further, the property’s assessment for subsequent tax years is 

included in this proceeding.2 

 

ISSUES AND APPLICABLE LAW 

 

The issues in this matter are: 

 

1. Whether the subject property is assessed in excess of 50% of its true cash value 

(TCV). 

 

 

1 See MCL 205.762(1). 

2 See MCL 205.737(5)(b).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003598 

Page 2 of 7 

 

“The petitioner has the burden of proof in establishing the true cash value of the 

property.”3 

 

The assessment of real property in Michigan shall not exceed 50% of its TCV.4 “True 

cash value” means “the usual selling price . . . .”5 “True cash value” means “fair market 

value.”6 

 

The Tribunal is required to make an independent determination of TCV.7 “[T]he tribunal 

is not bound to accept either of the parties’ theories of valuation. It may accept one 

theory and reject the other, it may reject both theories, or it may utilize a combination of 

both in arriving at its determination.”8 

 

The Tribunal is required to select the valuation methodology that is accurate and bears 

a reasonable relationship to the property’s TCV.9 

 

2. Whether the TV exceeds the amount provided by MCL 211.27a. 

 

MCL 211.27a provides that a property’s TV is the lesser of the property’s SEV or 

capped TV, and a property’s capped TV is, absent a transfer of ownership, determined 

mathematically by taking into consideration the prior tax year’s TV, statutory losses, the 

lesser of the rate of inflation or 5%, and statutory additions, including omitted property 

(i.e., property not previously assessed).10 

 

SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE 

A. Petitioner’s Evidence 

 

Petitioner’s contentions of TCV, SEV and TV: 

 

Parcel Number: 28-25-36-432-020 

Year

TCV

SEV

TV

2024

$65,000

$32,500

$32,500

2025

$60,000

$30,000

$30,000

 

The exhibits offered by Petitioner may be viewed on line 1 of the docket maintained in 

this case.11 

 

No evidence was excluded. 

 

3 MCL 205.737(3); see also Kern v Pontiac Twp, 93 Mich App 612, 620; 287 NW2d 603 (1979). 

4 Michigan Const 1963, art IX, sec 3. 

5 MCL 211.27(1). 

6 CAF Investment Co v State Tax Comm, 392 Mich 442, 450; 221 NW2d 588 (1974). 

7 See Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp v City of Warren, 193 Mich App 348; 483 NW2d 416 (1992). 

8 Id. at 356. 

9 See Safran Printing Co v Detroit, 88 Mich App 376; 276 NW2d 602 (1979). 

10 See MCL 211.34d. 

11 The docket is located on the Tribunal’s website at Tax Docket Lookup Search Page and may be 

accessed by entering the docket number assigned to this case.

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 24-003598 

Page 3 of 7 

 

Based on the pleadings, admitted exhibits, and sworn testimony, Petitioner contends 

that Respondent’s failure to enforce the laws, codes and ordinances have caused 

Petitioner’s property values to be lower than the assessment. The new Hazel Park 

animal shelter next door to the subject property is open twenty-four hours per day and is 

a total nuisance. The animals howl, cry and fight all night and Petitioner is not able to 

enjoy their ownership of the subject property. The adjacent property also emits a foul 

odor that impacts the value of the subject property. 

 

During the hearing, Petitioner indicated that they have contacted the code enforcement 

department and police department, but their department has not taken any action to 

address Petitioner’s concerns. The city is not interested in enforcing the laws and 

ordinances despite taking an oath to do so. Petitoner’s neighbors do not like Petitioner 

living at the subject property and are interested in Petitioner and his brother moving to 

another property. Petitioner believes that there are troublemakers in the area, and

Page 4

MTT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Julius J. Pawlicha,

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

MTT Docket No.: 24-003598

City Of Hazel Park, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF TELEPHONE HEARING

The Tribunal has scheduled a telephone hearing to be conducted as follows. Hearings are 

generally 30 minutes in length. 

HEARING DATE:

October 29, 2025 

HEARING TIME:

8:30 AM EST

JOIN BY PHONE:

1-248-509-0316

ACCESS CODE:

888752493 

 

This hearing will be held by telephone conference call with the Judge as the host. In order to join 

the hearing, call the phone number listed above at least 5 minutes prior to the hearing time. You 

will then be required to input the access code, followed by # to connect. The Tribunal judge will call 

in and join by phone at the hearing time. Failure to timely call in may result in the placement of a 

party or parties in default.

This is an important legal document. Please have someone translate the document.

Este es un documento legal importante. Por favor, haga traducir este documento.

এটি একটি গুরুত্বপূর্ণ আইনি দলিল, অনুগ্রহ করে কেউ দলিলটিকে অনুবাদ করুন।

.ةقيثولا مجرتت صخش كيدل ىجري ةماه ةينوناق ةقيثو وه اذه

Ito ay isang mahalagang legal na dokumento. Mangyari lamang na magkaroon ng isang tao isalin ang 

dokumento.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003598

Page 2 of 13

HEARING INFORMATION – PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY

GENERAL INFORMATION: An impartial hearing will be conducted in accordance with the Michigan Tax 

Tribunal Rules (R 792.10201-R 792.10297) and the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act, MCL 24.201 et 

seq. The Michigan Rules of Evidence and the Michigan Court Rules may be applicable. Parties are expected 

to exercise proper respect and courtesy toward other parties, witnesses, and administrative law judges, which 

includes attending the hearing on time, silencing cell phones, and choosing a quiet, private location to 

participate in the hearing to limit distractions and ensure minimal background noise. The hearing may be 

recorded for notetaking purposes, but the recording is not a formal record, unless otherwise provided for by the 

Tribunal.

REPRESENTATION: You may have an attorney or anyone else of your choice represent you at the hearing. 

The Tribunal does not recommend or appoint representatives for you and will not pay for your representative.

WITNESSES: You may have anyone join you at the hearing to speak in support of your case. However, the 

time to present your case is limited and additional time may not be provided to accommodate witness 

testimony.

DOCUMENTATION: Parties are required to submit all documents in support of their contentions to both the 

Tribunal and the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents were 

previously submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the 

documents are not timely submitted to both the Tribunal and the opposing party, the documents may be 

excluded. Documents may be submitted to the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s electronic filing (e-

filing) system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to 

submission by e-mail. If sent by mail, the documents must be sent to the opposing party or their authorized 

representative at the address identified in the petition or answer for that party or authorized representative, 

unless the party or authorized representative filed an appearance or other documentation identifying a different 

mailing address. The documents do not need to be resubmitted after the Notice of Hearing if they were 

previously submitted to the Tribunal and the opposing party in this case.

If a hearing had previously been scheduled in this case and adjourned, and the adjournment order indicates 

that the parties are precluded from submitting any further documentary evidence, no further documentary 

evidence will be accepted even if filed and exchanged as indicated above.

INCLUSION OF SUBSEQUENT TAX YEARS: Subsequent tax year assessments are automatically included 

in valuation appeals once the assessment has been established for that tax year. For purposes of 

administrative efficiency, the Tribunal considers this date April 1st. As such, the parties should submit 

documentation and be prepared to discuss subsequent tax year assessments at hearings to be conducted on 

or after April 1st in a subsequent year. If the hearing is to be conducted prior to April 1st in a subsequent year, 

taxpayers are required to file a new petition and, if necessary, protest the subsequent tax year assessment at 

the March Board of Review for that year. 

MOTIONS/REQUESTS: A motion is a written request filed by a party asking the Tribunal to take certain

Page 3

MTT

Page 4

M

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Julius J. Pawlicha,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003598

City Of Hazel Park,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003598

Page 2 of 9

If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or 

email taxtrib@michigan.gov.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: December 11, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

Julius J. Pawlicha

1737 E Milton Ave

Hazel Park , MI 48030

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Julius J. Pawlicha,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003598

City Of Hazel Park,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by

Page 5

MT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 

_____________________________, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No. 

_____________________________, 

Respondent(s) 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

___________________________________ states that on ___________________ he/she 

[Name of person serving/mailing petition] 

 

 

[date of service] 

served a copy of the ___________________ relative to the above-captioned matter upon: 

[Provide name and address of the party/people being served] 

________________________________________________ 

________________________________________________ 

_________________________________________ 

[Signature of person who is serving/mailing copy] 

_________________________________________ 

[Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy] 

 

________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________

JULIA J PAWLICHA

24-003598

CITY OF HAZEL PARK

Kimberly Hampton

December 10, 2024

Inspection Letter

JULIA J PAWLICHA

1737 E. MILTON

HAZEL PARK, MI 48030

/s/ Kimberly Hampton

Kimberly Hampton

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

OAKLAND COUNTY EXECUTIVE DAVID COULTER 

 

 

 Equalization Division 

 (248) 858-0740 | equal@oakgov.com 

 

 

 

250 Elizabeth Lake Road, Ste. 1000 W | Oakland Pointe Office Building | Pontiac, MI 48341 | Fax (248) 858-2074 | oakgov.com 

December 10, 2024 

 

Julia J. Pawlicha 

1737 E. Milton 

Hazel Park, MI 48030 

 

Ref: 28-25-36-432-020 

Docket No: 24-003598 

 

 

Dear Julia J. Pawlicha: 

 

It has come to our attention that there is a pending Michigan Tax Tribunal appeal in regard to 

the above-mentioned property. We believe it is in both parties’ best interest to have an inspection 

done on the property before meeting with the Michigan Tax Tribunal. If there is additional 

information you would like us to consider in support of your contention of value, such as 

appraisals, construction costs, property sales data, market information, etc. please email it to us 

at the email address provided below. Any information sent to us does not satisfy the Tribunal 

rules for submitting evidence, and once a hearing date has been set, you will be required to 

submit evidence to the Michigan Tax Tribunal and Respondent as directed in the Notice of 

Hearing. 

 

Please contact Kimberly Hampton at 248-858-2039 or email us at appeals@oakgov.com within 

fourteen days of this letter to set up an appointment for a property review. 

 

 

Sincerely, 

 

Terry D. Schultz 

Chief, Oakland County Equalization

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

Michigan Department of Treasury, 

1019 (Rev, 1-24) 

THIS 

IS NOT A TAX BILL 

L-4400 

Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification 

This form is issued under the authority of P.A. 206 of 1893, Sec. 211.24 (c) and Sec.211.34c, as amended. This is a model assessment notice to be used by the local assessor. 

FROM: CITY OF HAZEL PARK 

MICHEAL R. LOHMEIER, ASSESSOR 

111 EAST NINE MILE ROAD 

HAZEL PARK MI 48030 

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION 

PARCEL NUMBER: 

28-25-36-432-020 

PROPERTY ADDRESS: 

1737 E MILTON 

Hazel Park, MI 48030-2323 

PAWLICHA, JULIUS J 

1737 E MILTON 

HAZEL PARK MI 48030-2323 

OWNER'S NAME & ADDRESS/PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION 

% Exempt As "Homeowners Principal Residence": 

100.00% 

% Exempt As "Qualified Agricultural Property": 

.00% 

% Exempt As "MBT Industrial Personal": 

.00% 

% Exempt As "MBT Commercial Personal: 

.00% 

Exempt As "Qualified Forest Property": 

O Yes 

No 

Exempt As "Development Property": 

O Yes 

No 

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 

TIN, R11E, SEC 36 OAKWAY SUB LOT 308 

ACCORDING TO MCL 211.34c THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) 

PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION: 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) 

The change in taxable value will increase/decrease your tax bill for the 2024 

PRIOR AMOUNT 

CN 

AMOUNT 

CAA 

year by approximately: 

$48 

YEAR: 

2023 

YEAR 

2024 

CURRENT YEAR 

1. TAXABLE VALUE: 

13,710 

14,390 

680 

2. ASSESSED VALUE: 

32,980 

37,730 

4,750 

3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 

1.000 

4. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV): 

32,980 

37,730 

4,750 

5. There WAS or WAS NOT a transfer of ownership on this property in 2023: WAS NOT 

6. Assessor Change Reason(s): 

Market Adjustment 

The 2024 Inflation Rate Multiplier is: 1.05 

Questions regarding the Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification may be directed to the following: 

Oakland County Equalization 

(248)858-0776 or (248)858-0773 

equal@oakgov.com 

March Board of Review Appeal Information: 

The Board of Review will meet at City Hall (111 E Nine Mile Rd) on Tuesday, March 5th for an Organizational Meeting from 9:00 am 

until 10:00 am. Appointments will begin on: 

Tuesday, March 5th from 10:00 am until 12:00 noon and 1:00 pm until 5:00 pm. 

Thursday, March 7th and Monday, March 11th from 1:00 pm until 5:00 pm and 6:00 pm until 9:00 pm. 

To schedule an appointment IN ADVANCE for the Board of Review, 

please contact Oakland County Equalization Division at (248) 858-0773. 

The Board of Review will accept written appeals through 5:00 pm on Monday, March 11th. 

NOTE: Written appeals MUST be in letter form. Emails will NOT be accepted.

Page 2

AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 

STATE OF MICHIGAN} 

COUNTY OF OAKLAND} 

Adam Bailey, being first duly sworn, says that he enclosed in a 

window envelope, 2024 Real Property Assessment Change Notices, then 

sealed the envelopes and mailed the notices to residents in Ferndale, Hazel 

(Park, Lathrup Village, Pleasant Ridge, Walled Lake, Bloomfield Hills and 

Huntington Woods. 

Affiant further states that he delivered said envelope to the Michigan 

Metroplex Post Office in the City of Pontiac, State of Michigan on the gh 

day of February, 2024. 

Affiant further states that he placed such amount of postage in Oakland 

County’s Permit #14 account that is required by postal regulations for the 

mail to go Presorted First Class. 

I a 

Adam Bailey, Oakland County Support Services Supervisor 

Subscribed and sworn to before me this am™ day of Ma Ch ,2024. 

Acuna 

D. Honidon 

h) 

| 

N 

PublicNotary 

Kimberly D. Hampton 

Oakland County, Michigan 

My Commission expires 9 — (4-208

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-003598

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City Of Hazel Park (OAKLAND)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Terry

M.I.

D

Last Name

Schultz

Firm Name (if any)

Oakland County Equalization

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

250 Elizabeth Lake Rd.

Suite 1000 West

City or Town

Pontiac

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48341

Telephone Number

248-858-0740

Fax Number

248-975-4407

E-mail Address

appeals@oakgov.com

Section 3: Subject Property Information

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

Yes

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another.

N/A 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this 

document, you may be held in default.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

THE PROPERTY’S TRUE CASH, ASSESSED, & TAXABLE VALUES WERE PROPERLY CALCULATED AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE 

MICHIGAN CONSTITUTION, APPLICABLE STATUTES, AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS.

PETITIONER NOTATED THAT THE PROPERTY UNCAPPED FOR 2024. PER THE 2024 ASSESSMENT CHANGE NOTICE SENT TO PETITIONER, NO 

EVENT OCCURRED CAUSING AN UNCAPPING OF 2024'S TAXABLE VALUE. 

PETITIONER ALSO CONTESTS THAT THEY APPEALED AT THE 2024 LOCAL DECEMBER BOARD OF REVIEW. PETITIONER DID NOT FILE ANY 

APPEALS WITH THE LOCAL DECEMBER BOARD OF REVIEW FOR 2024

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? March*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

If yes, cite the Board’s authority.

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? 

If yes, explain.

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

If so, what is the issue date?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued?

NO UNCAPPING EVENT OCCURRED FOR 2024, AS NOTATED ON THE 2024 ASSESSMENT CHANGE NOTICE (SEE ATTACHED).

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped?

NO UNCAPPING EVENT OCCURRED FOR 2024, AS NOTATED ON THE 2024 ASSESSMENT CHANGE NOTICE (SEE ATTACHED).

n/a

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS

Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended:

Tax Year(s) denied:

List the date the exemption was denied:

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number:

28-25-36-432-020

Classification of Property:

Real 

Residential

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

$37,730

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

$14,390

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

$75,460

Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

$37,730

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

$14,390

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ TERRY D. SCHULTZ

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Julius J. Pawlicha,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003598

City Of Hazel Park,

Respondent.

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

is appealing assessments for prior tax years and the Tribunal has no authority over 

those assessments under MCL 205.735a, as the petition was not timely filed.1 Further, 

the Tribunal also has no authority over those assessments, as the facts alleged do not 

establish that the assessments were the result of a clerical error (i.e., “an error of a 

transpositional, typographical, or mathematical nature”) or a mutual mistake of fact (i.e., 

“an erroneous belief, which is shared and relied on by both parties”).2 Rather, the facts 

alleged indicate a valuation dispute that does not involve the correction of a clerical 

error or mutual mistake of fact. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s assessment appeal is PARTIALLY DISMISSED. The 

appeal shall continue for the 2024 tax year(s) only.

APPEAL RIGHTS

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless 

the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a 

principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the 

decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, 

if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the 

opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to 

1 See Electronic Data Systems Corporation v Township of Flint, 253 Mich App 538 (2002). 

2 See International Place Apartments – IV v Ypsilanti Township, 216 Mich App 104, 109 (1996), Ford 

Motor Company v City of Woodhaven, 475 Mich 425, 442 (2006).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003598

Page 2 of 5

electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the 

motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral 

arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal.

Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the 

claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If 

the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal 

by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the 

record on appeal. There is no certification fee. 

By:___________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: October 9, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

Julius J. Pawlicha

1737 E Milton Ave

Hazel Park , MI 48030

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Julius J. Pawlicha,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003598

City Of Hazel Park,

Respondent.

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

is appealing assessments for prior tax years and the Tribunal has no authority over 

those assessments under MCL 205.735a, as the petition was not timely filed.3 Further, 

the Tribunal also has no authority over those assessments, as the facts alleged do not 

establish that the assessments were the result of a clerical error (i.e., “an error of a 

transpositional, typographical, or mathematical nature”) or a mutual mistake of fact (i.e., 

“an erroneous belief, which is shared and relied on by both parties”).4 Rather, the facts 

alleged indicate a valuation dispute that does not involve the correction of a

Page 5

MT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUL 01 2024 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAKS 

L 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. 

RIGA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First Name 

M.I. 

Last Name/Company Name 

. 

Jel ins 

J [Faw lie ha 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

11837 

EE. Mi [Fon 

Haas] Pork 

|" Feozo 

(548182%-5928 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

{| 

First Name 

M.1 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

parcels are you 

Yes* 

No** 

appealing? 

*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. 

**If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted. 

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) 

[If multiple, list first 

property’s address] 

(131 E. 

Mi Hon Hoze ( 

wrk 

Me 

45538 

Taxing Authority (City or Township) 

County 

Haze | Park 

Bak lanol

Page 2

J 

neg hd 

phe ivi 

py fies hy 

Ue aye woken “wo every 

I cific 

<a 

3 

of Ne erys, + 

@ 

2 +figl 

ve, Tee rads, Va Qadans 

that 

have = 

€5 on. The Satur yo 

he 

iy 

joovid 

rote 

: 

: oi 

tired) a wd inthe 

garage. 

eo, 

1D 

ads fob Fe 

© 

» 

»loS5ums, 

Al en 

s¢ 

cpt = rol vo desis ae 3° For Haz 

iy 

Iz 7 Ys 1S hel already.

Page 3

Page 3 

rds 

a 

BE Erm» halbi pes rs EE M (fonioes 

. Co 

N oporoved Ly the e 

Andimal Quontrol ¢ of iacr, oo 

 lbnlee oats & 6.04.130- Duties 

& 

RR Nessanse - 8.04.00 

The 

Perak 1.06000 is gif ota 

Th ents 

he 

here eave bene or 

rss 

Lohtah ro Ani wal arue, [+v 

| =| 

; 

Phos ez. She i5 res, sold ds fe —— 

animal a a5) 

Fiaer - +» 2 s50)ze pn bain 

harbored in an syed place, sha pay is 

at lovge. 

Vo 

EE 

wl host 

ori 

100, Zz itive: 

ures “lohoes) oo 

EN— 

| oF site ence, 

a 

+ 

)—— a 

— 

_ 

Oe ped he th 

hm 

on East Aiba Ave. L700 Bleek |

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check 

all that apply) 

BF True Cash and Taxable Value 

O Poverty Exemption 

jg Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[J Disabled Veterans Exemption 

NAT Uncapping of Taxable Value 

O Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

[J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a 

[0 Classification 

Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

Toe ety of Hazel Park, The Aode EnforaemenT, The Foliage Deo 

Animal Aorctrsl Dept; She Total ragliges 

enee by alata above] 

Fo mad wtain Fhelr 

property 

su 

m y paree/ Entorde 

codes, js wd or dlaes n i lpi ”y 

The 

ass 

and 

w 

vithe 

las 

years 

een, in 

rod 2c oy — +o tofecttall, il deppncpmar are rr 

dle 

or stalk NS pions 

vor, ac 

pees Fem howl (erys. gk 6-10 aofs ever dg redo [4 

Tie 

/ ni 6c The fowl smell +e eriake The ast 

Foo ho wionek vod 

hie 

’s fey sutsicle aoe grovel and 

] 

—- 

n 

7 

: 

a) 

A 

Sect 

6: Ea Zoos 

Jf. 

- Please see Aertahed Sheet 

Year(s) you are appealing: 

Fi 

207, 2027, 2.073, 2D 

Did you protest vr assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Bd 

ves 

Od No 

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: Er tarcn 

a July 

[HeBecembrer 

If No, check the applicable reason(s): 

Not required to attend 

Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner 

O Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) 

O Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 

O Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping 

Did you request a poverty exemption at the BOR? O Yes 

No 

If Yes, check which BOR considered your application AND attach the BOR decision: Od March 

O July 

O December 

If No, explain why:

Page 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

78-25-36 ~432-020

Page 6

STATE OF

Page 7

**

Page 8

ne

Page 9

|

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Julius J. Pawlicha,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003598

City Of Hazel Park,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: October 2, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

Julius J. Pawlicha

1737 E Milton Ave

Hazel Park , MI 48030

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Julius J. Pawlicha,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003598

City Of Hazel Park,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: October 2, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUL 01 2024 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAKS 

L 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. 

RIGA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First Name 

M.I. 

Last Name/Company Name 

. 

Jel ins 

J [Faw lie ha 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

11837 

EE. Mi [Fon 

Haas] Pork 

|" Feozo 

(548182%-5928 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

{| 

First Name 

M.1 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

parcels are you 

Yes* 

No** 

appealing? 

*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. 

**If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted. 

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) 

[If multiple, list first 

property’s address] 

(131 E. 

Mi Hon Hoze ( 

wrk 

Me 

45538 

Taxing Authority (City or Township) 

County 

Haze | Park 

Bak lanol

Page 2

J 

neg hd 

phe ivi 

py fies hy 

Ue aye woken “wo every 

I cific 

<a 

3 

of Ne erys, + 

@ 

2 +figl 

ve, Tee rads, Va Qadans 

that 

have = 

€5 on. The Satur yo 

he 

iy 

joovid 

rote 

: 

: oi 

tired) a wd inthe 

garage. 

eo, 

1D 

ads fob Fe 

© 

» 

»loS5ums, 

Al en 

s¢ 

cpt = rol vo desis ae 3° For Haz 

iy 

Iz 7 Ys 1S hel already.

Page 3

Page 3 

rds 

a 

BE Erm» halbi pes rs EE M (fonioes 

. Co 

N oporoved Ly the e 

Andimal Quontrol ¢ of iacr, oo 

 lbnlee oats & 6.04.130- Duties 

& 

RR Nessanse - 8.04.00 

The 

Perak 1.06000 is gif ota 

Th ents 

he 

here eave bene or 

rss 

Lohtah ro Ani wal arue, [+v 

| =| 

; 

Phos ez. She i5 res, sold ds fe —— 

animal a a5) 

Fiaer - +» 2 s50)ze pn bain 

harbored in an syed place, sha pay is 

at lovge. 

Vo 

EE 

wl host 

ori 

100, Zz itive: 

ures “lohoes) oo 

EN— 

| oF site ence, 

a 

+ 

)—— a 

— 

_ 

Oe ped he th 

hm 

on East Aiba Ave. L700 Bleek |

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check 

all that apply) 

BF True Cash and Taxable Value 

O Poverty Exemption 

jg Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[J Disabled Veterans Exemption 

NAT Uncapping of Taxable Value 

O Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

[J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a 

[0 Classification 

Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

Toe ety of Hazel Park, The Aode EnforaemenT, The Foliage Deo 

Animal Aorctrsl Dept; She Total ragliges 

enee by alata above] 

Fo mad wtain Fhelr 

property 

su 

m y paree/ Entorde 

codes, js wd or dlaes n i lpi ”y 

The 

ass 

and 

w 

vithe 

las 

years 

een, in 

rod 2c oy — +o tofecttall, il deppncpmar are rr 

dle 

or stalk NS pions 

vor, ac 

pees Fem howl (erys. gk 6-10 aofs ever dg redo [4 

Tie 

/ ni 6c The fowl smell +e eriake The ast 

Foo ho wionek vod 

hie 

’s fey sutsicle aoe grovel and 

] 

—- 

n 

7 

: 

a) 

A 

Sect 

6: Ea Zoos 

Jf. 

- Please see Aertahed Sheet 

Year(s) you are appealing: 

Fi 

207, 2027, 2.073, 2D 

Did you protest vr assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Bd 

ves 

Od No 

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: Er tarcn 

a July 

[HeBecembrer 

If No, check the applicable reason(s): 

Not required to attend 

Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner 

O Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) 

O Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 

O Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping 

Did you request a poverty exemption at the BOR? O Yes 

No 

If Yes, check which BOR considered your application AND attach the BOR decision: Od March 

O July 

O December 

If No, explain why:

Page 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

78-25-36 ~432-020

Page 6

STATE OF

Page 7

**

Page 8

ne

Page 9

|

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.