05._Property_Tax_Appeal_Answer_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.058e8491-fe8d-44fc-a748-09c8d2116717.pdf
Julius J. Pawlicha, Petitioner V City Of Hazel Park, Respondent · 24-003598-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-003598 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City Of Hazel Park (OAKLAND) First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Terry M.I. D Last Name Schultz Firm Name (if any) Oakland County Equalization Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 250 Elizabeth Lake Rd. Suite 1000 West City or Town Pontiac State Michigan ZIP Code 48341 Telephone Number 248-858-0740 Fax Number 248-975-4407 E-mail Address appeals@oakgov.com Section 3: Subject Property Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? Yes Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. N/A Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR THE PROPERTY’S TRUE CASH, ASSESSED, & TAXABLE VALUES WERE PROPERLY CALCULATED AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE MICHIGAN CONSTITUTION, APPLICABLE STATUTES, AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. PETITIONER NOTATED THAT THE PROPERTY UNCAPPED FOR 2024. PER THE 2024 ASSESSMENT CHANGE NOTICE SENT TO PETITIONER, NO EVENT OCCURRED CAUSING AN UNCAPPING OF 2024'S TAXABLE VALUE. PETITIONER ALSO CONTESTS THAT THEY APPEALED AT THE 2024 LOCAL DECEMBER BOARD OF REVIEW. PETITIONER DID NOT FILE ANY APPEALS WITH THE LOCAL DECEMBER BOARD OF REVIEW FOR 2024 Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? March*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, cite the Board’s authority. Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? If yes, explain. Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? If so, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? NO UNCAPPING EVENT OCCURRED FOR 2024, AS NOTATED ON THE 2024 ASSESSMENT CHANGE NOTICE (SEE ATTACHED). Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? NO UNCAPPING EVENT OCCURRED FOR 2024, AS NOTATED ON THE 2024 ASSESSMENT CHANGE NOTICE (SEE ATTACHED). n/a IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 28-25-36-432-020 Classification of Property: Real Residential Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: $37,730 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: $14,390 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? $75,460 Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. $37,730 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. $14,390 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ TERRY D. SCHULTZ