Record Finder / 26-000732-TT
Michigan

John Willis III Petitioner V City Of Jackson Respondent

Petitioner
John Willis III
Respondent
City Of Jackson

Case overview

Docket number
26-000732-TT
Status
Ready Schedule
CaseType
SC Property
Division
Small Claims Division
County
Jackson
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
9Notice of FilingNot recordedNot recorded09/11/2026Not recordedDownload
8Answer was receivedRESPNot recorded07/17/2026Not recordedDownload
7Order of Partial DismissalNot recordedNot recorded09/11/2026Not recordedDownload
6Order Setting Aside P DefaultNot recordedNot recorded09/11/2026Not recordedDownload
5Response to OrderPETNot recorded07/08/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
4Order of Default of PetitionerNot recordedNot recorded06/25/2026Not recordedDownload
3Petition has been verifiedPET106/25/2026Not recordedDownload
2Notice of Docket Number SCNot recordedNot recorded06/25/2026Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded05/06/2026$0.00Download

Documents

SC-Notice_of_Filing_of_Answer.2026-09-11_15-41-38.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

John Willis III,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000732

City Of Jackson,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an 

appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan 

Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan 

Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal 

settlement conference process.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-000732

Page 2 of 4

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or 

email taxtrib@michigan.gov.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: 

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

John Willis III

323 N Grinnell St

Jackson , MI 49202

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

John Willis III,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000732

City Of Jackson,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an 

appeal

Page 5

MT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

JA C K S (Ba 

City Assessor’s Office 

@riNTT 

W. Michigan Av 

161 W. Michigan Ave. » Jackson, M1 49201 

Founded 1829 

Phone: (517) 788-4033 + Facsimile: (866) 902-7891 

RECEIVED 

1 

uly 9, 2026 

JUL 172026 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

PO Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909 

RE: 

MTT Docket No. 26-000732 

Answer Form 

John Willis II vs. City of Jackson 

Please find enclosed for filing in the above-captioned matter Respondent’s 

Answer Form, Proof of Service, and notice that gave rise to the appeal. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Jason Yoakam 

Assessor 

Enclosures

Page 2

(ern, 

Beams 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

MTT DOCKET NO, 26-000732 

Section 1: Respondent's Contact Information 

First Name: 

ML: 

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government: 

City of Jackson, Michigan 

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

County: 

161 W Michigan Avenue 

Jackson 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Jackson 

MI 

149201 

Telephone Number: 

Fax Number: 

517-788-4033 

866-902-7891 

E-mail Address (do not enter unfess you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

jyoakam@gityofjackson.org 

Section 2: Respondent's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

ML: 

First Name: 

Last Name: 

Jason 

Yoakam 

Firm Name (if any): 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

161 W Michigan Avenue 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Jackson 

MI 

149201 

Tetephone Number: 

Fax Number: 

517-788-4033 

866-902-7891 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

jyoakam@cityofjackson.org 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Does the subject property hava a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

[4 Yes 

[1] No 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

If not, fist which parcels adjoin one another. 

ves 

[No 

[yl Notapplicable

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

Property is assessed at 50% of true cash value. Property is assessed in conformance 

with generally accepted assessment practices and in accordance with the Michigan 

General Property Tax Act and Michigan Constitution. Property's assessed value is 

based upon relevant market comparables and arms-length sales for properties of similar 

square footage. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

iF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [¥] Yes 

[a] No 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [/l March 

[] July 

[] December 

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? [I] Yes 

[] No 

*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. 

if the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [Ml] Yes 

[] No 

if yes, cite the Board's authority. 

Was the assessment(s} at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [a] Yes 

[¥] No 

If yes, explain 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

[I] Yes 

4 No 

If so, what Is the issue date?

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? O Yes 

[i] No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [] March 

[J July 

[] December 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner's Poverty Exemption: 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS 

Did Petitioner request the exemption ata BOR? O Yes 

[0] No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [] March 

[J July 

[J December 

Tax Year(s) denied: 

List the date the exemption was denied: 

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY 

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

a 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Section 6: Valuation Information *use the muttipie parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

2-080000000 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

i] 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

$105,000 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

$105,000 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

$210,000 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

$105,000 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Page 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

BEFORE THE MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

JOHN WILLIS III, 

PETITIONER 

VS 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

CITY OF JACKSON, MICHIGAN 

DOCKET NO. 26-000732 

A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, 

RESPONDENT 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

) 

COUNTY OF JACKSON 

) 

A true copy of this Respondent's Answer Form has been forwarded to John Willis III, petitioner, 

at 323 N Grinnell St, Jackson, MI, 49202, by first-class mail with all postage and fees prepaid 

thereon on July 9, 2026. 

Gi 

Sdn 

Curtis Sawdon 

Appraiser, City of Jackson 

Subscribed and sworn to me, a Notary Public, on July 8, 2026.

Page 6

CITY OF 

JACKS 

S 

ASSESSOR'S OFFICE 

161 W. MICHIGAN AVENUE 

JACKSON, MICHIGAN 49201 

FIRST-CLASS MAIL 

PRESORTED 

U.S. POSTAGE PAID 

MARANA GROUP 

t=" 

uv 

aoe 

LY nf 

panied 

TT —T 

nz 

FoiisF 

4890S 

Wiese 

jel faba 

so IY 

ebro 

id

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Partial_Dismissal_-_Valuation.2026-09-11_15-19-33.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

John Willis III,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-000732

City Of Jackson,

Respondent.

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

is appealing assessments for prior tax years and the Tribunal has no authority over 

those assessments under MCL 205.735a, as the petition was not timely filed.1 Further, 

the Tribunal also has no authority over those assessments, as the facts alleged do not 

establish that the assessments were the result of a clerical error (i.e., “an error of a 

transpositional, typographical, or mathematical nature”) or a mutual mistake of fact (i.e., 

“an erroneous belief, which is shared and relied on by both parties”).2 Rather, the facts 

alleged indicate a valuation dispute that does not involve the correction of a clerical 

error or mutual mistake of fact. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s assessment appeal is PARTIALLY DISMISSED. The 

appeal shall continue for the 2026 tax year(s) only.

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

Entered: September 11, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

1 See Electronic Data Systems Corporation v Township of Flint, 253 Mich App 538 (2002). 

2 See International Place Apartments – IV v Ypsilanti Township, 216 Mich App 104, 109 (1996), Ford 

Motor Company v City of Woodhaven, 475 Mich 425, 442 (2006).

Page 2

John Willis III

323 N Grinnell St

Jackson , MI 49202

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

John Willis III,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-000732

City Of Jackson,

Respondent.

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

is appealing assessments for prior tax years and the Tribunal has no authority over 

those assessments under MCL 205.735a, as the petition was not timely filed.3 Further, 

the Tribunal also has no authority over those assessments, as the facts alleged do not 

establish that the assessments were the result of a clerical error (i.e., “an error of a 

transpositional, typographical, or mathematical nature”) or a mutual mistake of fact (i.e., 

“an erroneous belief, which is shared and relied on by both parties”).4 Rather, the facts 

alleged indicate a valuation dispute that does not involve the correction of a clerical 

error or mutual mistake of fact. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s assessment appeal is PARTIALLY DISMISSED. The 

appeal shall continue for the 2026 tax year(s) only.

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

Entered: September 11, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

3 See Electronic Data Systems Corporation v Township of Flint, 253 Mich App 538 (2002). 

4 See International Place Apartments – IV v Ypsilanti Township, 216 Mich App 104, 109 (1996), Ford 

Motor Company v City of Woodhaven, 475 Mich 425, 442 (2006).

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Order_Setting_Aside_P_Default.2026-09-11_15-18-22.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

John Willis III, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-000732

City Of Jackson,

Respondent.

ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioner was held in 

default on June 25, 2026, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing 

the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the 

document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE.

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

Entered: September 11, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

John Willis III

323 N Grinnell St

Jackson , MI 49202

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

John Willis III, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-000732

City Of Jackson,

Respondent.

ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioner was held in 

default on June 25, 2026, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing 

the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the 

document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE.

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

Entered: September 11, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

2026 Board of Review Decision .pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

03/13/2026 

2026 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION" ™ 

FROM 

CITY ASSESSOR 

CITY OF JACKSON 

161 W MICHIGAN AVE 

JACKSON, MI 49201 

o 

Plone? 517-188-4033 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: (Parcel Code required. 

Property address 

and legal description optional): 

2-080000000 

323 N GRINNELL ST 

WILLIS JOHN III 

323 N GRINNELL ST 

JACKSON, MI 49202-4211 

LOT 30 MALANEY & RICHARD'S ADD 

THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED 

401 (RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) 

Thank you for attending this years March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed the information you supplied and the data necessary 

to compute your assessment and taxable value. 

The Board has completed their review of parcel number 2-080000000 

They have made the following determination based on the information you supplied. 

Board of Review Comments 

REVISED MARKET ADJUSTMENT 

[2026 

ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE 

124,100 

[2026 

"BOARD OF REVIEW" ASSESSED VALUE 

105,000 

| 

(If the above amounts are the same, no revisions have occured) 

[2026 ORIGINAL TAXABLE VALUE 

109,170 

[2026 "BOARD OF REVIEW" TAXABLE VALUE 

105,000 

| 

[2026 PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION/QUALIFIED AG 

100.0000 

Please feel free to contact the assessor at the address listed above or call if you have any questions. 

If you disagree with the decision of the Board of Review regarding the special assessment, you may appeal that decision by filing a petition 

with the Michigan Tax Tribunal, P.O.Box 30232, Lansing, MI. 48909 within 35 days of the decision. The petition must be filed on a 

Michigan Tax Tribunal form or a form approved by the Michigan Tax Tribunal. The Michigan Tax Tribunal forms are available at 

www.michigan.gov/taxtrib.

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 26-000732

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? Yes

Party Filing Document 

Petitioner

Files

Document Type: Response to Order

Attachment File Name: 2026 Board of Review Decision

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC_Order_of_Default_of_Petition.2026-06-25_17-18-02.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

John Willis III,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-000732

City Of Jackson,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of 

action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment 

notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 

14 days of the entry of this order. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.i 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: June 25, 2026

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-000732

Page 2 of 4

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)

Page 3

John Willis III

323 N Grinnell St

Jackson , MI 49202

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

John Willis III,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-000732

City Of Jackson,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of 

action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment 

notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 

14 days of the entry of this order. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.ii 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: June 25, 2026

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

ii “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial

Page 5

MTT Docket No. 26-000732

Page 2 of 2

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)

Page 6

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

John Willis III,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-000732

City Of Jackson,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds

Page 7

MT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

MITAT_Valuation_Petition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

1 of 3

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL

MTT DOCKET NO. 

Petitioner’s Contact Information:

Filer Type:

Individual

Local Unit of Government:

First Name

John

M.I.

Last Name

Willis III

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

323 N Grinnell St

City or Town

Jackson

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

49202

Telephone Number

5173926397

E-mail Address

johnson_sierra2@yahoo.com

Subject Property Information:

How many parcels are you appealing?

1

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?

*If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel

N/A 

Property Address (No., Street)

323 N Grinnell St

City or Town

Jackson

County

Jackson

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

49202

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Jackson (JACKSON)

Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Values

 

Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

2 of 3

Although the subject property of 323 N Grinnell St. is larger than many surrounding homes (approximately 2,566 square feet), its market value is influenced and 

limited by the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood, in addition to repairs needed to the home itself. Recent comparable sales in close proximity reflect 

significantly smaller homes selling at lower overall price points. For example:

 • 315 N Grinnell St (approximately 1,326 sq ft) sold for $160,000

 • 326 N Grinnell St (approximately 1,395 sq ft) sold for $113,000

These properties are notably smaller yet establish the typical price range for the immediate area. When analyzed on a price-per-square-foot basis, these smaller 

homes sold at approximately $110–$120 per square foot, while the subject property sold for approximately $72 per square foot ($186,000 ÷ 2,566 sq ft). This 

reflects a well-established market principle that larger homes typically sell for less per square foot, particularly in neighborhoods where surrounding properties 

are smaller and lower priced.

As a result, the surrounding market creates a ceiling effect on value. Buyers in this area are not paying substantially higher total prices for larger homes, despite 

increased square footage.

This is directly reflected in the subject property’s recent arm’s-length purchase price of $186,000 on March 8, 2024, which represents its true market value after 

full exposure to the open market for 180 days.

Also, there is significant water damage around the chimney in the lower level of the home, which was not present at the time of sale. The home also lacks central 

air and heating; it has only a boiler heating system with radiators. These factors cause a decrease in the market value of the home as well.

Based on Michigan’s assessment standards, the assessed (SEV) value should approximate 50% of the true cash value. The current assessed value of $105,000 

appears to exceed what is supported by both the recent purchase price and comparable neighborhood sales. Based on my recent arm’s-length purchase price of 

$186,000, the implied assessed (SEV) value should be approximately $93,000. The current assessment exceeds this amount and does not reflect the property’s 

true market value as supported by both the sale and comparable neighborhood data.

For these reasons, I respectfully request that the assessed value be adjusted to reflect the property’s actual market-supported value.

Thank you

Jurisdictional Issues:

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes

If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: March

If No, please check the applicable reason(s):

Year(s) Under Appeal:

2024 - 2026

 

Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal:

Parcel Number:

2-080000000

Classification of Property: Personal (check one)

Residential (check one)

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

3 of 3

Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review:

105000

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

105000

What do you believe is the fair market value?

184000

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

92000

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

90000

 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner’s Signature: 

/s/ John Willis III

Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature:

/s/ 

Fee Information:

If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for 

the filing of this appeal.

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel 

with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each 

additional parcel being appealed.

Property tax appeal: Residential** Non-Residential

SEV or TV in contention*

 

 Filing fee*** Filing Fee**

$100,000 or less...........................................................................................$ 125.00 $250.00

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00.........................................................................$ 200.00 N/A

More than $500,000…..................................................................................$ 300.00 N/A

Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition?

Yes

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-06-25_17-14-42.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

John Willis III,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000732

City Of Jackson,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: June 25, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

John Willis III

323 N Grinnell St

Jackson , MI 49202

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

John Willis III,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000732

City Of Jackson,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: June 25, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

John Willis III,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 26-000732

City Of Jackson,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: June 25, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

MITAT_Valuation_Petition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

1 of 3

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL

MTT DOCKET NO. 

Petitioner’s Contact Information:

Filer Type:

Individual

Local Unit of Government:

First Name

John

M.I.

Last Name

Willis III

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

323 N Grinnell St

City or Town

Jackson

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

49202

Telephone Number

5173926397

E-mail Address

johnson_sierra2@yahoo.com

Subject Property Information:

How many parcels are you appealing?

1

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?

*If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel

N/A 

Property Address (No., Street)

323 N Grinnell St

City or Town

Jackson

County

Jackson

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

49202

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Jackson (JACKSON)

Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Values

 

Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

2 of 3

Although the subject property of 323 N Grinnell St. is larger than many surrounding homes (approximately 2,566 square feet), its market value is influenced and 

limited by the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood, in addition to repairs needed to the home itself. Recent comparable sales in close proximity reflect 

significantly smaller homes selling at lower overall price points. For example:

 • 315 N Grinnell St (approximately 1,326 sq ft) sold for $160,000

 • 326 N Grinnell St (approximately 1,395 sq ft) sold for $113,000

These properties are notably smaller yet establish the typical price range for the immediate area. When analyzed on a price-per-square-foot basis, these smaller 

homes sold at approximately $110–$120 per square foot, while the subject property sold for approximately $72 per square foot ($186,000 ÷ 2,566 sq ft). This 

reflects a well-established market principle that larger homes typically sell for less per square foot, particularly in neighborhoods where surrounding properties 

are smaller and lower priced.

As a result, the surrounding market creates a ceiling effect on value. Buyers in this area are not paying substantially higher total prices for larger homes, despite 

increased square footage.

This is directly reflected in the subject property’s recent arm’s-length purchase price of $186,000 on March 8, 2024, which represents its true market value after 

full exposure to the open market for 180 days.

Also, there is significant water damage around the chimney in the lower level of the home, which was not present at the time of sale. The home also lacks central 

air and heating; it has only a boiler heating system with radiators. These factors cause a decrease in the market value of the home as well.

Based on Michigan’s assessment standards, the assessed (SEV) value should approximate 50% of the true cash value. The current assessed value of $105,000 

appears to exceed what is supported by both the recent purchase price and comparable neighborhood sales. Based on my recent arm’s-length purchase price of 

$186,000, the implied assessed (SEV) value should be approximately $93,000. The current assessment exceeds this amount and does not reflect the property’s 

true market value as supported by both the sale and comparable neighborhood data.

For these reasons, I respectfully request that the assessed value be adjusted to reflect the property’s actual market-supported value.

Thank you

Jurisdictional Issues:

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes

If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: March

If No, please check the applicable reason(s):

Year(s) Under Appeal:

2024 - 2026

 

Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal:

Parcel Number:

2-080000000

Classification of Property: Personal (check one)

Residential (check one)

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

3 of 3

Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review:

105000

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

105000

What do you believe is the fair market value?

184000

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

92000

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

90000

 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner’s Signature: 

/s/ John Willis III

Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature:

/s/ 

Fee Information:

If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for 

the filing of this appeal.

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel 

with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each 

additional parcel being appealed.

Property tax appeal: Residential** Non-Residential

SEV or TV in contention*

 

 Filing fee*** Filing Fee**

$100,000 or less...........................................................................................$ 125.00 $250.00

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00.........................................................................$ 200.00 N/A

More than $500,000…..................................................................................$ 300.00 N/A

Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition?

Yes

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.