Record Finder / 25-001636-TT
Michigan

Jefferson Land Inc, Petitioner Vs. City Of Detroit, Respondent

Petitioner
Jefferson Land Inc
Respondent
City Of Detroit

Case overview

Docket number
25-001636-TT
Status
Disposed
CaseType
ET Property
Division
ET
County
Wayne
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
7Order of DismissalNot recordedNot recorded06/17/2025Not recordedDownload
6Notice of Filing of Motion to WithdrawNot recordedNot recorded06/09/2025Not recordedDownload
5Motion to Withdraw Appeal was received.PETNot recorded06/03/2025$0.00Download
4Order of Default of PetitionerNot recordedNot recorded05/30/2025Not recordedDownload
3Petition has been verifiedPET105/30/2025Not recordedDownload
2Notice of Docket Number ETNot recordedNot recorded05/29/2025Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded05/15/2025$0.00Download

Documents

Order_of_Dismissal-WD_b4_Answer.2025-06-17_16-30-09.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Jefferson Land Inc, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No. 25-001636

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

has filed a Motion to Withdraw the appeal. Petitioner’s motion was filed prior to the 

answer being filed. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

This Order resolves all pending issues and closes the case.

By:____________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: June 17, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Jefferson Land Inc, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No. 25-001636

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

has filed a Motion to Withdraw the appeal. Petitioner’s motion was filed prior to the 

answer being filed. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

This Order resolves all pending issues and closes the case.

By:____________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: June 17, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Jefferson Land Inc, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No. 25-001636

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Petitioner 

has filed a Motion to Withdraw the appeal. Petitioner’s motion was filed prior to the 

answer being filed. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

This Order resolves all pending issues and closes the case.

By:____________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: June 17, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Notice_of_Filing_of_Mtn_to_Withdraw.2025-06-09_13-36-32.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Jefferson Land Inc,

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-001636

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL

TAKE NOTICE that Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw (Motion) in the above-

captioned appeal. Because the Motion was not filed jointly (i.e. signed by both parties or 

representatives), Respondent has seven days from the service of the Motion to file a 

response. Respondent may respond by agreeing to (i.e. concurrence) the withdrawal of 

the case or by objecting to the Motion. If Respondent does not timely submit a 

concurrence or objection to the request, it will be deemed to be a concurrence and the 

request will be granted, unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. If the request is 

granted, the case will be dismissed. If a request is not granted or the Tribunal has not 

notified you that it has been granted, you are required to attend the hearing. 

For your convenience, you may use the Tribunal’s form “Response to Motion to 

Withdraw Appeal” located on the Tribunal’s website. To access the form, please go to 

our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib and go to either the “Entire Tribunal” or “Small 

Claims” page, depending on the division in which the case is pending. To submit the 

response, please fill out the form and file it with the Tribunal by e-mail or e-filing.1

By: Tribunal Clerk__________

Entered: June 9, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

1 Though you may file the response by hard copy (i.e. mail), filing by e-mail or e-filing will facilitate the 

efficient administration of justice.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Jefferson Land Inc,

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-001636

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL

TAKE NOTICE that Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw (Motion) in the above-

captioned appeal. Because the Motion was not filed jointly (i.e. signed by both parties or 

representatives), Respondent has seven days from the service of the Motion to file a 

response. Respondent may respond by agreeing to (i.e. concurrence) the withdrawal of 

the case or by objecting to the Motion. If Respondent does not timely submit a 

concurrence or objection to the request, it will be deemed to be a concurrence and the 

request will be granted, unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. If the request is 

granted, the case will be dismissed. If a request is not granted or the Tribunal has not 

notified you that it has been granted, you are required to attend the hearing. 

For your convenience, you may use the Tribunal’s form “Response to Motion to 

Withdraw Appeal” located on the Tribunal’s website. To access the form, please go to 

our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib and go to either the “Entire Tribunal” or “Small 

Claims” page, depending on the division in which the case is pending. To submit the 

response, please fill out the form and file it with the Tribunal by e-mail or e-filing.2

By: Tribunal Clerk__________

Entered: June 9, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

2 Though you may file the response by hard copy (i.e. mail), filing by e-mail or e-filing will facilitate the 

efficient administration of justice.

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUN 06 2025 

grey, 

= 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Jefferson Land, Inc. 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No.25-001636 

City of Detroit 

Respondent(s) 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL 

1. 

1 wish to withdraw my appeal in the above-captioned docket. 

2. 

Good cause exists to grant withdrawal because: 

I'am unable to file any further informaiton regarding this petition, as requested per the 

order of default. 

| therefore wish to withdraw my appeal. 

3. 

lask this Tribunal to grant my request to withdraw the appeal and dismiss the above- 

captioned docket. 

Please select one of the following: 

__ lam filing this Motion to Withdraw before Respondent filed an Answer or a responsive 

motion with the Tribunal. 

X_ I'am filing this Motion to Withdraw after Respondent has filed an Answer or Responsive 

Motion with the Tribunal. 

1 attached to this Motion Respondent's written consent to withdraw my 

petition, or 

I shall grant Respondent the opportunity to object to this withdrawal. 

/ 

Kait M Helsen 

Partf/Repredentative (sign here) 

Print name of person signing 

| certify that on this date 

| served a copy of this Motion, and any additional documentation, on the

Page 2

METROPLEX MI 

JEFFERSON LAND, INC. 

19640 Harper Ave. Sta. B 

Grosse Pte. Woods, Ml 48236 

MicHicty THC TRIBUNAL 

Gll 

W. 

oTr7IWHA ST. 

LEMING, m) 

4977 

SEEHE- OTOL 

EE 

UN ST 

EU HR 

EU RUB T

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET_Order_of_Default_Petition.2025-05-30_14-26-27.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Jefferson Land Inc,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-001636

City of Detroit,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner failed to file a complete petition and also failed to pay the required filing fee 

for the Entire Tribunal petition. See TTR 233 and 223. As a result, the appeal is not 

properly pending. See TTR 227. Petitioner is required to file an amended petition and 

remit the full filing fee within 14 days of the entry of this Order. The petition shall note 

the docket number assigned by the Tribunal. Tribunal rules and information on Entire 

Tribunal petitions and filing fees and fee calculator can be found on our website at 

www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via e-filing.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this Order.i 

Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: May 30, 2025

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-001636

Page 2 of 2

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Jefferson Land Inc..pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

RECEIVED 

EEE, 

ER 

MAY 16 2925 

¢ RE, 

pe 

* "MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

LANSING 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Jefferson Land Inc. 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No. 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No: 03000030-2 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

The property identified above is 

X 

real __ personal. 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? Yes __ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- 

contiguous parcel.) 

4. 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? ___Yes ___ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

8. 

The property identified above is classified as Commercial-lmproved

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

8. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

Commercial property with an increase of over $40,000. 

| understand that this parcel is now in 

combination with another, which is likely what caused the remarkable increase; we would like 

to understand how everything was calculated. While the taxable value and SEV make sense, 

the increase does not. 

The property or properties at issue are located in Wayne 

County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

519 E. Jefferson 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): City of Detroit 

Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 

19640 Harper Ave 

Grosse Pointe, MI 48236 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

X 

the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition orioss? X__Yes __ No 

uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment

Page 3

MTT. Docket No. 

Page 30f4 

| 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the prior 

tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

2,290,788 

1,145,400 

477,908 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

| would like to understand the reasoning and calculation behind the increase before 

requesting relief. 

If the matter is not resolved in a reasonable manner, we it would be 

difficult to adjust our budget so aggressively at this point.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 

Page 4 of 4 

; 

Signature] 

etitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

7/2 

V/4 

~~ 

Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Kait M Helsen 

Email Address: kait@jefflandinc.com 

Mailing Address: 

19640 Harper Ave 

Grosse Pointe, MI 48236 

Telephone Number: 313-884-2100 

Date: 5/12/25

Page 5

or 

CURRENT 

: 

oa 

fe] 

ange. 

\ 

5 REAR RS 

he 

~ CHAN 

~R 

ne Tira 

year bya proximately: 

4 

TENTATIVE 

PRIOR Tenn 1 

p 

yi 

YEAR: 2024 - 

| 

AMOUNT YEAR: [ 

5° 

CURRENT YEAR 

San 

: 

2025 

: 

|Z TAXABLE VALUE, 

Il 

fe 

of 

477,908 

477,908 

2.ASSESSED VALUE; ~~ 

i 

: 

ol 

1,145,400 

1,145,400 

3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR:, 1,00 

i 

z 

i 

[4 STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV): 

eR 

0 

1,145,400 

"1,145,400 

pet 

THIS IS NOT A TAX BILL 

L-4400 

Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification 

This form is issued under the authority of Public Act 206 of 1893, Sec. 211.24c and Sec.211.34c, as amended. Thi 

is a model assessment notice to be Used by the local assessor. 

FROM: 

~~. 

ci 

; 

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION 

SITE ORDETRON, 

is 

PARCEL NUMBER: 03000030-2 

2% 

PERTY 

RESS: 

5 

JEFFERSON 

. 

2 WOODWARD AVE,, SUITE 804 

FRO 

AbD 

ce 

aE 

SRN 

DETROIT, M1 48226 

OWNER’S NAME & ADDRESS/PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL 

PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION 

23081003881 /0014 

% Exempt 

As "Homeownets Principal 

3 

Lynlylyld 

HTH 

ER 

| 

| Residence": 

id 

rte 

og fo 

pg 

i [ty 

4 

SER 

dai 

% Exempt As "Qualified Agricultural Property": 0.0000% 

JEFFERSON LAND INC 

2 

3 

3 

19640 HARPER A 

% Exempt As "MBT Industrial Personal: 

0.0000% 

ROSS 

i 

© 

E POINTE Wobs, MI 48236-1966 

_|% Exempt As "MBT Commercial Personal": 

-0.0000% 

Exempt As "Qualified Forest Property": 

- 

.[] Yes XI No 

‘| Exempt As "Development Property": 

[1 Yes 

XI No 

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 

N SGT 6061 W TFT OF § 80 FT. OF 62 PLAT.OF COMMISSIONERS SUB OF L BEAUBIEN 

FARM L6 P475-8 CITY RECORDS, W CR 3/3 107 IRREG COMBINED ON 10/23/2024

Page 6

e

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2025-05-29_09-08-15.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Jefferson Land Inc, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 25-001636

City of Detroit, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this Notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this Notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this Notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the Notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: __Tribunal Clerk________

Entered: May 29, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Jefferson Land Inc..pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

RECEIVED 

EEE, 

ER 

MAY 16 2925 

¢ RE, 

pe 

* "MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

LANSING 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Jefferson Land Inc. 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No. 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No: 03000030-2 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

The property identified above is 

X 

real __ personal. 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? Yes __ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- 

contiguous parcel.) 

4. 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? ___Yes ___ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

8. 

The property identified above is classified as Commercial-lmproved

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

8. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

Commercial property with an increase of over $40,000. 

| understand that this parcel is now in 

combination with another, which is likely what caused the remarkable increase; we would like 

to understand how everything was calculated. While the taxable value and SEV make sense, 

the increase does not. 

The property or properties at issue are located in Wayne 

County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

519 E. Jefferson 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): City of Detroit 

Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 

19640 Harper Ave 

Grosse Pointe, MI 48236 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

X 

the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition orioss? X__Yes __ No 

uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment

Page 3

MTT. Docket No. 

Page 30f4 

| 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the prior 

tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

2,290,788 

1,145,400 

477,908 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

| would like to understand the reasoning and calculation behind the increase before 

requesting relief. 

If the matter is not resolved in a reasonable manner, we it would be 

difficult to adjust our budget so aggressively at this point.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 

Page 4 of 4 

; 

Signature] 

etitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

7/2 

V/4 

~~ 

Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Kait M Helsen 

Email Address: kait@jefflandinc.com 

Mailing Address: 

19640 Harper Ave 

Grosse Pointe, MI 48236 

Telephone Number: 313-884-2100 

Date: 5/12/25

Page 5

or 

CURRENT 

: 

oa 

fe] 

ange. 

\ 

5 REAR RS 

he 

~ CHAN 

~R 

ne Tira 

year bya proximately: 

4 

TENTATIVE 

PRIOR Tenn 1 

p 

yi 

YEAR: 2024 - 

| 

AMOUNT YEAR: [ 

5° 

CURRENT YEAR 

San 

: 

2025 

: 

|Z TAXABLE VALUE, 

Il 

fe 

of 

477,908 

477,908 

2.ASSESSED VALUE; ~~ 

i 

: 

ol 

1,145,400 

1,145,400 

3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR:, 1,00 

i 

z 

i 

[4 STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV): 

eR 

0 

1,145,400 

"1,145,400 

pet 

THIS IS NOT A TAX BILL 

L-4400 

Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification 

This form is issued under the authority of Public Act 206 of 1893, Sec. 211.24c and Sec.211.34c, as amended. Thi 

is a model assessment notice to be Used by the local assessor. 

FROM: 

~~. 

ci 

; 

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION 

SITE ORDETRON, 

is 

PARCEL NUMBER: 03000030-2 

2% 

PERTY 

RESS: 

5 

JEFFERSON 

. 

2 WOODWARD AVE,, SUITE 804 

FRO 

AbD 

ce 

aE 

SRN 

DETROIT, M1 48226 

OWNER’S NAME & ADDRESS/PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL 

PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION 

23081003881 /0014 

% Exempt 

As "Homeownets Principal 

3 

Lynlylyld 

HTH 

ER 

| 

| Residence": 

id 

rte 

og fo 

pg 

i [ty 

4 

SER 

dai 

% Exempt As "Qualified Agricultural Property": 0.0000% 

JEFFERSON LAND INC 

2 

3 

3 

19640 HARPER A 

% Exempt As "MBT Industrial Personal: 

0.0000% 

ROSS 

i 

© 

E POINTE Wobs, MI 48236-1966 

_|% Exempt As "MBT Commercial Personal": 

-0.0000% 

Exempt As "Qualified Forest Property": 

- 

.[] Yes XI No 

‘| Exempt As "Development Property": 

[1 Yes 

XI No 

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 

N SGT 6061 W TFT OF § 80 FT. OF 62 PLAT.OF COMMISSIONERS SUB OF L BEAUBIEN 

FARM L6 P475-8 CITY RECORDS, W CR 3/3 107 IRREG COMBINED ON 10/23/2024

Page 6

e

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.