Hamilton Estates LLC Petitioner V City Of Kalamazoo Respondent
- Petitioner
- Hamilton Estates LLC
- Respondent
- City Of Kalamazoo
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-001242-TT
- Status
- Default Petitioner
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Kalamazoo
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 09/24/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Order of Default of Petitioner | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/02/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 09/02/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/31/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/22/2026 | $75.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
Michigan Department of Treasury, 1019 (Rev. 10-25) THIS IS NOT A TAX BILL L-4400 Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification oss This form is issued under the authority of Public Act 206 of 1893, Sec. 211.24c and Sec.211.34c, as amended. This is a model assessment notice to be used by the local assessor. FROM CITY OF KALAMAZOO PARCEL IDENTIFICATION ASSESSOR'S OFFICE PARCEL NUMBER: 06-28-492-002 241 W SOUTH ST KALAMAZOO, MI 49007-4750 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 628 WHITES RD KALAMAZOO, MI 49008 SCHOOL DISTRICT CODE: 39010 OWNER'S NAME & ADDRESS/PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL. EXEMPTIONS 20668 % Exempt As "Homeowners Principal Residence": .00% kskx RR AAUTO* *MIXED AADC 493 T35 Pl kif % Exempt As "Qualified Agricultural Property": .00% LO ESTATES as, % Exempt As "MBT Industrial Personal": .00% TR TO lel] Will! % Exempt As "MBT Commercial Personal": .00% TE | UT LL CLT FT CCLLETLUTY Cf FTE CL TR | TTT ET Exempt As "Disabled Veteran or Surviving Spouse": O Yes No Exempt As "Qualified Forest Property": O Yes No Exempt As "Development Property": 0 Yes No LEGAL DESCRIPTION: G28-7-1A1A Section 28-2-11 Commencing at the intersection of the east line of the southeast 1/4 of Section 28-2-11 & the center line of Whites Road; thence North 330ft along said east line to the south line of Whitcomb Street; thence West 527.5ft along the south line of Whitcomb Street, parallel with the center line of Whites Road, to the point of beginning; thence South 165ft parallel with said east line; ACCORDING TO MCL 211.34c THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 201 Commercial PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION IF DIFFERENT: 201 Commercial ; ai ; CURRENT CHANGE FROM The change in taxable value will increase/decrease your tax bill PRIOR AMOUNT TENTATIVE AMOUNT PRIOR YEAR TO or the 2026 year by approximately: -$5897 2025 YEAR 2026 CURRENT YEAR 1. TAXABLE VALUE: 567,200 481,900 -85,300 2. ASSESSED VALUE: 567,200 481,900 -85,300 3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 1.000 4. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV): 567,200 481,900 -85,300 5. WAS THERE A TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP IN025 THAT RESULTED IN A TAXABLE VALUE UNCAPPING? O Yes No 6. Assessor Change Reason(s): Market Adjustment The 2026 Inflation rate Multiplier is: 1.027 Questions regarding the Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification may be directed to the Following: Name: Aaron Powers Telephone Number: (269) 337-8636 Email Address: cokassessor@kalamazoocity.org March Board of Review Appeal Information. The Board of Review will meet at the following dates and times: The Board will meet starting March 9, 2026 through March 13, 2026 at various times. Walk-ins are NOT permitted. To schedule an in-person appointment, call 269-337-8845 before 5:00 pm March 6, 2026. The Board will also accept protests from both residents and non-residents in writing if RECEIVED in the office by March 13, 2026 at 12:00 pm. POSTMARKS are NOT acceptable.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001242 Respondent’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government: City Of Kalamazoo (KALAMAZOO) First Name M.I. Last Name Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any: First Name John M.I. W Last Name Megdan Firm Name (if any) WCA Assessing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 241 W South St City or Town Kalamazoo State Michigan ZIP Code 49007 Telephone Number 7348458647 E-mail Address jmegdan@wcaassessing.com Subject Property Information: Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. *If necessary, attach a separate sheet. No Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more? No
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal: The SEV and Taxable Value represents 50% of Fair Market Value and all values in the City of Kalamazoo have been uniformly assessed. Jurisdictional Issues: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES: Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review? No If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended: If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? Yes *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, please cite the Board’s authority? Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, please explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? No If yes, when was it issued? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE: When was the Notice of Uncapping issued? Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Valuation Information: Parcel Identification Number: 06-28-492-002 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 481901 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 481900 What do you believe is the fair market value? 963800 What do you believe is the taxable value? 481900 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent’s Signature: /s/ John W Megdan Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Hamilton Estates LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-001242 City Of Kalamazoo, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner filed the wrong petition for the issue being appealed, did not identify an authorized representative in section 2, and has not paid the full required fee for the filing of the appropriate petition. See TTR 279 and 269. As such, the appeal is not properly pending. Petitioner must complete and return the appropriate petition for the issue being appealed with the additional fee amount required for the filing of that petition within 14 days of the entry of this order. The petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal. Small Claims petition forms and a filing fee calculator can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via e-filing. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-001242 Page 2 of 2 Entered: September 2, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Hamilton Estates LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-001242 City Of Kalamazoo, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner filed the wrong petition for the issue being appealed, did not identify an authorized representative in section 2, and has not paid the full required fee for the filing of the appropriate petition. See TTR 279 and 269. As such, the appeal is not properly pending. Petitioner must complete and return the appropriate petition for the issue being appealed with the additional fee amount required for the filing of that petition within 14 days of the entry of this order. The petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal. Small Claims petition forms and a filing fee calculator can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via e-filing. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.2 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 26-001242 Page 2 of 2 Entered: September 2, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
Petitioner’s Valuation Summary for 628 Whites Road Item Amount Full monthly rent potential $17,600 Full annual rent potential $211,200 Actual monthly collections $13,000 Actual annualized collections $156,000 Annual operating expenses $78,587 Actual NOI $77,413 Requested cap rate 9.0% Indicated value $860,144 Requested rounded true cash value $850,000 Requested SEV / taxable value $425,000 The requested value reflects the property’s actual income, economic occupancy, operating expenses, and significant deferred maintenance/capital needs. The property was not fully stabilized as of the valuation period.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 1 of 3 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. Petitioner’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Organization Local Unit of Government: First Name M.I. Last Name Hamilton Estates LLC Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 221 W LAKE LANSING RD City or Town EAST LANSING State Michigan ZIP Code 48823 Telephone Number 2699983915 E-mail Address eric_hamilton_wmu@yahoo.com Subject Property Information: How many parcels are you appealing? 1 If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? *If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel N/A Property Address (No., Street, City, St, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 628 Whites Road Kalamazoo Michigan 49008 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Kalamazoo (KALAMAZOO) County Kalamazoo Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal: Hamilton Estates LLC appeals the 2026 assessed value, taxable value, and state equalized value assigned to 628 Whites Road, Kalamazoo, Michigan. The property is a 16-unit multifamily apartment building. The current 2026 assessed value and taxable value of $481,900 imply a true cash value of $963,800. Petitioner contends that this value exceeds the property’s true cash value based on actual income, economic occupancy, operating expenses, deferred maintenance, remaining capital needs, and the condition of the property as of the relevant valuation date. The property's full annual rent potential is approximately $211,200, but actual annualized collections are approximately $156,000. Annual operating expenses are approximately $78,587, resulting in actual NOI of approximately $77,413. The property also requires significant capital improvements, including replacement of windows and balconies. Petitioner requests that the 2026 true cash value be reduced to $850,000, with assessed value, SEV, and taxable value reduced to $425,000.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 2 of 3 Jurisdictional Issues: Did you protest the classification at the March Board of Review? No If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Not required (i.e., MI Department of Treasury) Explanation: Year(s) Under Appeal: 2026 Classification Information: Parcel Identification Number: 06-28-492-002 Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) What do you believe is the property’s classification? Real (check one) Commercial (check one) If improved property, how is the property currently being used? Multifamily residential apartment building / 16-unit rental property If improved property, for what use was the property designed? The property was designed for multifamily residential apartment use as a 16-unit rental apartment building. Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner’s Signature: /s/ Eric Hamilton Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/ Fee Information:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 3 of 3 If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for the filing of this appeal. A fee of $75.00 is required for the filing of a classification appeal. Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition?
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Hamilton Estates LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-001242 City Of Kalamazoo, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: August 31, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Hamilton Estates LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-001242 City Of Kalamazoo, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: August 31, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
Petitioner’s Valuation Summary for 628 Whites Road Item Amount Full monthly rent potential $17,600 Full annual rent potential $211,200 Actual monthly collections $13,000 Actual annualized collections $156,000 Annual operating expenses $78,587 Actual NOI $77,413 Requested cap rate 9.0% Indicated value $860,144 Requested rounded true cash value $850,000 Requested SEV / taxable value $425,000 The requested value reflects the property’s actual income, economic occupancy, operating expenses, and significant deferred maintenance/capital needs. The property was not fully stabilized as of the valuation period.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 1 of 3 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. Petitioner’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Organization Local Unit of Government: First Name M.I. Last Name Hamilton Estates LLC Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 221 W LAKE LANSING RD City or Town EAST LANSING State Michigan ZIP Code 48823 Telephone Number 2699983915 E-mail Address eric_hamilton_wmu@yahoo.com Subject Property Information: How many parcels are you appealing? 1 If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? *If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel N/A Property Address (No., Street, City, St, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 628 Whites Road Kalamazoo Michigan 49008 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Kalamazoo (KALAMAZOO) County Kalamazoo Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal: Hamilton Estates LLC appeals the 2026 assessed value, taxable value, and state equalized value assigned to 628 Whites Road, Kalamazoo, Michigan. The property is a 16-unit multifamily apartment building. The current 2026 assessed value and taxable value of $481,900 imply a true cash value of $963,800. Petitioner contends that this value exceeds the property’s true cash value based on actual income, economic occupancy, operating expenses, deferred maintenance, remaining capital needs, and the condition of the property as of the relevant valuation date. The property's full annual rent potential is approximately $211,200, but actual annualized collections are approximately $156,000. Annual operating expenses are approximately $78,587, resulting in actual NOI of approximately $77,413. The property also requires significant capital improvements, including replacement of windows and balconies. Petitioner requests that the 2026 true cash value be reduced to $850,000, with assessed value, SEV, and taxable value reduced to $425,000.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 2 of 3 Jurisdictional Issues: Did you protest the classification at the March Board of Review? No If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Not required (i.e., MI Department of Treasury) Explanation: Year(s) Under Appeal: 2026 Classification Information: Parcel Identification Number: 06-28-492-002 Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) What do you believe is the property’s classification? Real (check one) Commercial (check one) If improved property, how is the property currently being used? Multifamily residential apartment building / 16-unit rental property If improved property, for what use was the property designed? The property was designed for multifamily residential apartment use as a 16-unit rental apartment building. Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner’s Signature: /s/ Eric Hamilton Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/ Fee Information:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 3 of 3 If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for the filing of this appeal. A fee of $75.00 is required for the filing of a classification appeal. Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition?
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.