Michigan

Grand Capital Saginaw LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Saginaw Respondent

Petitioner: Grand Capital Saginaw LLC
Respondent: Township Of Saginaw

Case overview

Docket number: 26-001451-TT
Status: Answer Due
CaseType: ET Property
Division: ET
County: Saginaw
Judge: No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #	Subject	Filer	Line Ref	Enter Date/Post Mark	Fee	Related Item
8	Appearance	RESP	Not recorded	09/29/2026	Not recorded	Download
7	Documentation	Not recorded	Not recorded	10/07/2026	Not recorded	Download
6	Proof of Service of Misc Documents was received.	Not recorded	Not recorded	10/07/2026	Not recorded	Download
Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Download
5	Answer was received	RESP	Not recorded	10/07/2026	Not recorded	Download
Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Download
4	Proof of service of petition was received.	Not recorded	Not recorded	09/15/2026	Not recorded	Download
Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Download
3	Petition has been verified	PET	1	08/13/2026	Not recorded	Download
Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Download
2	Notice of Docket Number ET	Not recorded	Not recorded	08/13/2026	Not recorded	Download
1	A petition was received.	PET	Not recorded	05/26/2026	$600.00	Download
Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Not recorded	Download

Documents

26-001451.pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

BRAUN KENDRICK 

FRANCIS J. KEATING 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

Attorney 

TEL: 989.631.1027 

FAX: 989.631.9880 

EMAIL: frakea@braunkendrick.com 

September 28, 2026 

VIA E-MAIL: taxtrib@michigan.gov 

Ms. Samantha M. Welton 

Chief Clerk 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

P.O. Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909 

Re: 

Grand Capital Saginaw LLC v Township of Saginaw 

MTT Docket No.: 26-001451 

Dear Ms. Welton: 

Enclosed please find Respondent’s Appearance and Proof of Service for the above-referenced matter. 

Please file the same in your usual manner. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

If you have any questions regarding it, please contact me. 

V 

rs, 

FRANCIS J. KEATING 

FIK/Is 

Enclosures 

cc: 

Client (w/encs) 

Aaron M. Fales (w/encs) 

4935-1286-2164, v. 

1 

BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER P.L.C. 

MIDLAND 

SAGINAW 

MT. PLEASANT 

BRAUN KENDRICK.COM

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

GRAND CAPITAL SAGINAW LLC, 

Petitioner, 

MTT Docket No.: 26-001451 

Vv 

TOWNSHIP OF SAGINAW, 

Respondent. 

LAW OFFICES OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. 

BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER P.L.C. 

By: 

Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 

By: 

Francis J. Keating (P39223) 

Attorney Petitioner 

Attorneys for Respondent 

330 Hamilton Row, Suite 350 

4301 Fashion Square Blvd. 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

Saginaw, MI 48603 

(248) 767-9840 

(989) 498-2100 

afaleslaw(@gmail.com 

frakea@braunkendrick.com 

APPEARANCE 

NOW COMES Braun Kendrick Finkbeiner P.L.C., by Francis 

J. Keating, and hereby 

enters its Appearance on behalf of Respondent, Township of Saginaw. 

BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER P.L.C. 

Dated: September Z/ 

, 2026 

BY: 

FRANCIS 7 KEATING (P39223) 

Attorney for Respondent 

4925-4994-1716, v. 1

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

GRAND CAPITAL SAGINAW LLC, 

Petitioner, 

MTT Docket No.: 26-001451 

v 

TOWNSHIP OF SAGINAW, 

Respondent. 

LAW OFFICES OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. 

BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER P.L.C. 

By: 

Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 

By: 

Francis J. Keating (P39223) 

Attorney Petitioner 

Attorneys for Respondent 

330 Hamilton Row, Suite 350 

4301 Fashion Square Blvd. 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

Saginaw, MI 48603 

(248) 767-9840 

(989) 498-2100 

afaleslaw(@gmail.com 

frakea@braunkendrick.com 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

LEE STADLER, duly sworn, deposes and says that she is a secretary in the employ of 

BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER P.L.C., attorneys for the Respondent, Township of Saginaw, 

and states that on the 2% Hday 

of September, 2026, she served 

a copy of Respondent’s 

Appearance via first class mail, by placing same in an envelope with sufficient postage attached 

and plainly addressed to: Aaron M. Fales, 330 Hamilton Row, Suite 350, Birmingham, MI 48009. 

Te 

LEE STADLER 

4908-2693-4740, v. 1

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Grand Capital Saginaw LLC v Township of Saginaw (26-001451) correspondence.pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

BRAUN KENDRICK 

FRANCIS J. KEATING 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

Attorney 

TEL: 989.631.1027 

FAX: 989.631.9880 

EMAIL: frakea@braunkendrick.com 

October 7, 2026 

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING 

Ms. Samantha M. Welton 

Chief Clerk 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

P.O. Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909 

Re: 

Grand Capital Saginaw LLC v Township of Saginaw 

MTT Docket No.: 26-001451 

Dear Ms. Welton: 

Enclosed please find Respondent’s Answer to Petition and Proof of Service for the above-referenced 

matter. Please file the same in your usual manner. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

If you have any questions regarding it, please contact me. 

Very truly yours, 

Francie 1]. Keating 

FRANCIS J. KEATING 

FIK/Is 

Enclosures 

cc: 

Client (w/encs) 

Aaron M. Fales (w/encs) 

4902-3839-3559, v. 

1 

BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER PL.C. 

MIDLAND 

SAGINAW 

MT. PLEASANT 

240 W. Main St, 

Suite 1200, Midland, 

MI 48640 

TEL 

989.631.1027 

TEL: 

989.498.2100 

TEL 989.775.7404 

FAX: 989.631.9880 

FAX: 989.799.4666 

FAX: 989.775.3764 

BRAUNKENDRICK.COM

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Grand Capital Saginaw LLC v Township of Saginaw (26-001451) Proof of Service.pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

GRAND CAPITAL SAGINAW LLC, 

Petitioner, 

MTT Docket No.: 26-001451 

Vv 

TOWNSHIP OF SAGINAW, 

Respondent. 

LAW OFFICES OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. 

BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER P.L.C. 

By: 

Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 

By: 

Francis J. Keating (P39223) 

Attorney Petitioner 

Attorneys for Respondent 

330 Hamilton Row, Suite 350 

4301 Fashion Square Blvd. 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

Saginaw, MI 48603 

(248) 767-9840 

(989) 498-2100 

afaleslaw(@gmail.com 

frakea@braunkendrick.com 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

LEE STADLER, duly sworn, deposes and says that she is a secretary in the employ of 

BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER P.L.C., attorneys for the Respondent, Township of Saginaw, 

and states that on the Hay of October, 2026, she served a copy of Respondent’s Answer to 

Petition via first class mail, by placing same in an envelope with sufficient postage attached and 

plainly addressed to: Aaron M. Fales, 330 Hamilton Row, Suite 350, Birmingham, MI 48009. 

le Se 

LEE STADLER 

4919-6474-2871, v. 1

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SubsequentFiling.pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 26-001451

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No

Party Filing Document 

Respondent

Files

Document Type: Proof of Service: Misc Documents

Attachment File Name: Grand Capital Saginaw LLC v Township of Saginaw (26-001451) Proof of 

Service

Document Type: Documentation

Attachment File Name: Grand Capital Saginaw LLC v Township of Saginaw (26-001451) 

correspondence

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Grand Capital Saginaw LLC v Township of Saginaw (26-001451) Respondent's Answer to Petition.pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

GRAND CAPITAL SAGINAW LLC, 

Petitioner, 

MTT Docket No.: 26-001451 

Vv 

TOWNSHIP OF SAGINAW, 

Respondent. 

LAW OFFICES OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. 

BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER P.L.C. 

By: 

Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 

By: 

Francis J. Keating (P39223) 

Attorney Petitioner 

Attorneys for Respondent 

330 Hamilton Row, Suite 350 

4301 Fashion Square Blvd. 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

Saginaw, MI 48603 

(248) 767-9840 

(989) 498-2100 

afaleslaw(@gmail.com 

frakea@braunkendrick.com 

RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION 

NOW COMES Respondent, Township of Saginaw, by and through its attorneys, Braun 

Kendrick Finkbeiner P.L.C., and for its Answer to Petition states the following: 

1. 

Respondent admits that real property tax parcel no., 23-12-4-20-2025-000 is also 

known as 5775 State Street, and is located in Saginaw County, Michigan. 

Respondent lacks 

knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in 

paragraph 1. 

2. 

Admitted. 

3. 

Admitted. 

4. 

Respondent admits that the property 

is classified as Commercial Real, and that 

Petitioner’s Property 

is commercial property. 

Respondent lacks knowledge 

or information 

sufficient to form a belief as to the remaining allegations in paragraph 4. 

4917-9855-6885, v. 1

Page 2

Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the

truth of the allegations in paragraph 5.

Respondent lacks knowledge of information sufficient to form a belief as to the

truth of the allegations in paragraph 6.

Respondent denies as untrue the allegations in paragraph 7.

7a.

Respondent denies as untrue the allegations in paragraph 7a.

7b.

Respondent denies as untrue the allegations in paragraph 7b.

Te.

Respondent denies as untrue the allegations in paragraph 7c.

7d.

Respondent denies as untrue the allegations in paragraph 7d.

NEW MATTERS AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

Petitioner has failed to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of

action against Respondent.

Petitioner has failed

to allege specific and sufficient

facts

to establish fraud,

discrimination, or illegality on the part of the Respondent.

Petitioner may not be the real party in interest to bring this tax appeal.

Petitioner may not have standing to bring this tax appeal.

Petitioner has failed to show that any factor other than fifty percent (50%) was

applied to the true cash value of Petitioner’s property, as well as all others, to arrive

at the

respective assessments appearing on the roll, and also fails to allege specific and sufficient facts

to support its allegations that the property’s taxable value is improper.

Respondent

has

properly

and

lawfully

assessed

Petitioner's

property

and

established its taxable value in accordance with statutory and constitutional requirements,

4917-9855-6885, v. 1

Page 3

75 

Respondent reserves the right to assert additional affirmative defenses during the 

pendency of this action. 

WHEREFORE, 

Respondent, 

Township 

of Saginaw, 

respectfully 

requests 

that 

this 

Honorable Tribunal provide it with the following relief: 

A. 

Dismiss the Petition with prejudice, and award Respondent its costs and attorney 

fees wrongfully incurred in the defense of this action; and 

B. 

Provide Respondent with such other relief as the Tribunal deems appropriate. 

BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBE 

PLC 

Dated: October 

& 

2026 

BY: 

FRANCISJ. 

KEATING (P39223) 

Attorney for Respondent 

4917-9855-6885, v. 1

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISAnswer.pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001451

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: 

Local Unit of Government

Local Unit of Government

Township Of Saginaw (SAGINAW)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Francis

M.I.

J

Last Name

Keating

Firm Name (if any)

Braun Kendrick

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

4301 Fashion Square Blvd.

City or Town

Saginaw

State

 Michigan

ZIP Code

48603

Telephone Number

9894982100

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

frakea@braunkendrick.com

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: 

Francis J. Keating

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

26 - SAG T - GC.pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

GRAND CAPITAL SAGINAW LLC, 

Petitioner, 

V. 

MTT Docket # 26-001451 

TOWNSHIP OF SAGINAW, 

Respondent. 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

) 

} ss. 

COUNTY OF OAKLAND) 

Aaron M. Fales, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on September IS 

2026 he served a 

copy of Petitioner's Petition on the parties named on the attached list. 

ee 

Aaron M. Fales

Page 2

BY CERTIFIED UNITED STATES MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED: 

CLERK 

SAGINAW 

1315S. WASHINGTON AVENUE 

SAGINAW, Mi 48501 

ASSESSOR 

SAGINAW 

1315S. WASHINGTON AVENUE 

SAGINAW, MI 48401 

AND BY FIRST-CLASS UNITED STATES MAIL: 

CLERK 

SAGINAW COUNTY 

111 8. MICHIGAN AVENUE 

SAGINAW, 

MI 48602-2019 

DIRECTOR OF EQUALIZATION 

SAGINAW COUNTY 

1171S. MICHIGAN AVENUE 

SAGINAW, MI 48802-2019 

SECRETARY OF SCHOOL BOARD 

SAGINAW CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 

550 MILLARD STREET 

SAGINAW CITY, MI 48407-1140 

STATE TREASURER 

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY 

TREASURY BUILDING 

430 W. ALLEGAN ST. 

LANSING, Mi 48922

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

GOVERNOR

LANSING

DIRECTOR

Grand Capital Saginaw LLC,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

MTT Docket No.: 26-001451

Township Of Saginaw,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted

docket number has been assigned to that petition.

This docket number shall be noted

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served

when filed.

A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition.

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice.

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[tlhe respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.”

Failure to do so

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this

case.

Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements

or the Tribunal's rules.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: August 13, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

| certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives,

if any, utilizing either the mailing

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

GRAND CAPITAL SAGINAW LLC, 

Petitioner, 

MTT Docket #24- 001451 

vs. 

Parcel No. 23-12-4-20-2025-000 

SAGINAW CHARTER TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent, 

/ 

PETITION 

GRAND CAPITAL SAGINAW LLC (“Petitioner”), through 

ifs attorneys, Law 

Office of Aaron M. Fales, P.C., says: 

1. 

Petitioner's principal office address 

is 30201 Orchard Lake Rd. 

, Ste. 

110, Farmington Hills, Mi 48334. 

Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to 

property taxes on real property tax parcel no. 23-12-4-20-2025-000 ("Petitioner's 

Property"), at 5775 State St., Saginaw, Mi, 48603. 

2. 

Respondent, Saginaw Township assesses and collects property taxes 

on Petitioner's Property. 

3. 

In 2026, Respondent determined the taxable value of Petitioner's 

Property 

to 

be 

$1,089,527 and 

assessed 

Petitioner's 

Property 

at 

$1,307,900 

resulting in a state equalized value of the same amount based on the tenative

Page 5

4. 

Petitioner's 

Property 

is 

classified 

as 

Commercial 

Real 

Property. 

Petitioner's Property 

is commercial property. 

Petitioner believes that Petitioner's 

Property was designed fo be used as a commercial purposes. 

5. 

This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, 

(c) taxable value, and {d} uniformity. 

6. 

At this time, Petitioner believes, as 

it relates to taxable value, that 

there is a dispute relative fo the value of a loss. 

7. 

The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable 

value, 

imposed 

on 

Petitioner's 

Property, 

and 

the 

taxes 

to 

be 

levied 

and 

collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the 

taxpayer for the reasons that: 

{a) 

The 

assessment,

Page 6

(d}

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SubsequentFiling.pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 26-001451

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No

Party Filing Document 

Petitioner

Files

Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition

Attachment File Name: 26 - SAG T - GC

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

2026 Petition - JK - 5775 State.pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

GRAND CAPITAL SAGINAW LLC, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

SAGINAW CHARTER TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent. 

/

 

 

 

MTT Docket #26- 

Parcel No. 23-12-4-20-2025-000 

 

PETITION 

 

 

GRAND CAPITAL SAGINAW LLC (“Petitioner”), through its attorneys, Law 

Office of Aaron M. Fales, P.C., says: 

 

1. 

Petitioner's principal office address is 30201 Orchard Lake Rd. , Ste. 

110, Farmington Hills, MI 48334. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to 

property taxes on real property tax parcel no. 23-12-4-20-2025-000 ("Petitioner's 

Property"), at 5775 State St., Saginaw, MI, 48603. 

 

2. 

Respondent, Saginaw Township assesses and collects property taxes 

on Petitioner's Property. 

 

3. 

 In 2026, Respondent determined the taxable value of Petitioner's 

Property to be $1,089,527 and assessed Petitioner's Property at $1,307,900 

resulting in a state equalized value of the same amount based on the tenative 

equalization factor.

Page 2

4. 

Petitioner's Property is classified as Commercial Real Property. 

Petitioner's Property is commercial property. Petitioner believes that Petitioner's 

Property was designed to be used as a commercial purposes. 

 

5. 

This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, 

(c) taxable value, and (d) uniformity. 

 

6. 

At this time, Petitioner believes, as it relates to taxable value, that 

there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss. 

 

7. 

The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable 

value, imposed on Petitioner's Property, and the taxes to be levied and 

collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the 

taxpayer for the reasons that: 

 

 

(a) 

The assessment, including state equalized value and/or 

taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and 

applicable statutes; 

 

 

(b) 

The assessment, including state equalized value and/or 

taxable value, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible 

under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

 

 

(c) 

The assessment, including taxable value and/or state 

equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash 

value of that portion of Petitioner's Property that is taxable under Michigan law, 

and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and,

Page 3

(d) 

The assessment, including state equalized value and/or 

taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, 

discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to 

uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

 

WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order 

reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Property from $1,089,527 to 

$500,000, and reducing the 2026 assessed and state equalized values of 

Petitioner's Property from $1,307,900 to $500,000, and requiring Respondent to 

pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dated: May 26, 2026 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

LAW OFFICE OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. 

Attorney for Petitioner 

 

 

By: _________________________ 

 

Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 

 330 Hamilton Row, Suite 350 

 Birmingham, MI 48009 

 (248) 767-9840

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

Grand Capital Saginaw LLC

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

30201 Orchard Lake Rd.

City or Town

Farmington Hills

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48334

Telephone Number

2487679840

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

afaleslaw@gmail.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Aaron

M.I.

Last Name

Fales

Firm Name (if any)

Law Office of Aaron M Fales, P.C.

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

330 Hamilton Row

Suite 350

City or Town

Birmingham

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48009

Telephone Number

248-767-9840

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

afaleslaw@gmail.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

5775 State

Saginaw

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48603

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of Saginaw (SAGINAW) 

County

Saginaw

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

Taxable Value Only (calculation)

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

23-12-4-20-2025-000

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

1307900

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

1089527

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

1000000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

500000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

500000

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Aaron Fales

Payment Information

Amount: 600

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26052686961267

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-08-13_07-22-43.pdfRead complete document text →

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Grand Capital Saginaw LLC,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

MTT Docket No.: 26-001451

Township Of Saginaw,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition.

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice.

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: August 13, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized

representatives.