Fifi Holdings, LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Berkley, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Fifi Holdings, LLC
- Respondent
- City Of Berkley
Case overview
- Docket number
- 25-002049-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Oakland
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Order of Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/17/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 14 | Motion to Withdraw Appeal was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/16/2026 | $0.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 13 | Appearance | RESP | Not recorded | 07/23/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 12 | Order Granting MTA | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/26/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 11 | Motion to Amend Subsequent Year was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/28/2026 | $125.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 10 | Prehearing General Call | Not recorded | Not recorded | 01/16/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/06/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | ET Case Info Sheet | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/06/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/06/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | ET Case Info Sheet | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/06/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Proof of service of petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 09/04/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Petition has been verified | PET | 2 | 08/08/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/08/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/31/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | ET Case Info Sheet | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/31/2025 | $250.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 FIFI Holdings, LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002049 City Of Berkley, Respondent. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that the parties have filed a Joint Motion to Withdraw the appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: August 17, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 FIFI Holdings, LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002049 City Of Berkley, Respondent. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that the parties have filed a Joint Motion to Withdraw the appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: August 17, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 FIFI Holdings, LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002049 City Of Berkley, Respondent. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that the parties have filed a Joint Motion to Withdraw the appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: August 17, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 4
STAT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
PROPERTY TAX REDUCTION SERVICES, LLC Mel R. Partovich 37887 West Twelve Mile Road, Suite B Jay A. Schwartz Farmington Hills, Michigan 48331 (248) 672-1922 https://propertytaxreductionservices.org August 7, 2026 ELECTRONIC FILING Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Re: FIFI Holdings, LLC v City of Berkley MTT Docket No. 25-002049-TT ----------------------------------------------- Parcel No. 04-25-07-479-033 Dear Madame/Sir: Petitioner is hereby withdrawing its Petition, and Respondent concurs in the withdrawal as indicated below. Please close the above-referenced file. Thank you. Very truly yours, PROPERTY TAX REDUCTION SERVICES, LLC /s/ Jay A. Schwartz JAS/lz CONSENT TO WITHDRAWAL: /s/ Seth A. O’Loughlin (w/Written Permission 8-12-26) Seth A. O’Loughlin (P80257) Hallahan & Associates, P.C. Attorney for Respondent 1750 South Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302 (248) 731-3089 soloughlin@hallahanlaw.com
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 25-002049 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Joint Files Document Type: Motion to Withdraw Appeal Attachment File Name: Letter Withdrawing Appeal (FIFI Holdings v Berkley 25-002049) 8-16-26 Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL FIFI Holdings LLC, Petitioner, v City of Berkley, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 25-002049 _____________________________________________________________________________/ JAY SCHWARTZ PROPERTY TAX REDUCTION SERVICES LLC Representative for Petitioner 37887 West Twelve Mile Road, Suite B Farmington Hills, MI 48331 (248) 672-1922 LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) KELSEA M. MELCHER (85821) HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Representative for Respondent 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 (248) 731-3089 _______________________________________________________________________/ RESPONDENT’S SUBSTITUTION OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Laura M. Hallahan of Hallahan & Associates, P.C. substitutes in place of Aaron P. Powers, Assessor, Canton Township, as authorized representative for Respondent City of Berkley and requests that she be copied on all future matters in the above docket. /s/ Aaron P. Powers (w/ permission)__ AARON P. POWERS ASSESSOR, CITY OF BERKLEY Dated: July 23, 2026 /s/ Seth A. O’Loughlin______________ LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821) HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Dated: July 23, 2026
Page 2
2 PROOF OF MAILING On the date below I sent by electronic mail a copy of the foregoing Respondent’s Substitution of Authorized Representative to: Jay Schwartz jschwartz@propertytaxreductionservices.org I declare that the statement above is true to the best of my information, knowledge and belief. /s/ Seth A. O’Loughlin____________ Dated: July 23, 2026 Seth A. O’Loughlin
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 FIFI Holdings, LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002049 City Of Berkley, Respondent. ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO AMEND The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that a motion has been filed requesting that the Tribunal permit Petitioner to amend the petition filed in this case to include the subsequent tax year. Respondent has not filed a response to the Motion to Amend. More importantly, the motion is timely under MCL 205.737 and 205.735a and Petitioner has shown good cause to justify the granting of the motion. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Amend is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order only grants the relief indicated above and does not find as true any allegations of fact or provide any other relief requested by the motion. By:___________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: June 26, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 FIFI Holdings, LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002049 City Of Berkley, Respondent. ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO AMEND The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that a motion has been filed requesting that the Tribunal permit Petitioner to amend the petition filed in this case to include the subsequent tax year. Respondent has not filed a response to the Motion to Amend. More importantly, the motion is timely under MCL 205.737 and 205.735a and Petitioner has shown good cause to justify the granting of the motion. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Amend is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order only grants the relief indicated above and does not find as true any allegations of fact or provide any other relief requested by the motion. By:___________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: June 26, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 FIFI Holdings, LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002049 City Of
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL FIFI HOLDINGS, LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-002049 CITY OF BERKLEY, Respondent. _______________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY TAX REDUCTION SERVICES, LLC By: Jay Schwartz Representative for Petitioner 37887 W. Twelve Mile Road, Suite B Farmington Hills, Michigan 484331 (248) 672-1922 jschwartz@propertytaxreductionservices.org Aaron P. Powers Representative for Respondent 38110 Executive Drive, Suite 200 Westland, Michigan 48185 (734) 331-3980 mttappeals@wcaassessing.com ______________________________________________________________________________ PETITIONER’S MOTION TO AMEND TO CONTEST 2026 ASSESSED AND TAXABLE VALUES Petitioner, FIFI HOLDINGS, LLC, by and through its Representative, Property Tax Reduction Services, LLC, and for its Motion to Amend to Contest 2026 Assessed and Taxable Values states: 1. Petitioner filed an Entire Tribunal Tax Petition in this matter for the 2025 tax year. 2. Petitioner seeks to amend the Petition to add an appeal for the 2026 tax year. 3. Petitioner brings this Motion pursuant to TTR 205.1202(c) and TTR 205.1230. 4. This amendment involves issues relating to the property’s true cash, state equalized and/or taxable values. 5. The values for the property identified herein, as established by Respondent, are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 25 07 479 033 $1,002,340 $501,170 $480,410
Page 2
2 6. Petitioner contends that the values for the property(ies) identified herein are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 25 07 479 033 $803,000 $401,500 $401,500 7. The values in dispute for the property(ies) identified herein are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 25 07 479 033 $199,340 $99,670 $78,910 8. The 2026 assessment, including the state equalized values and taxable values, imposed on Petitioner’s property(ies), and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful, and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: a. The assessments, including the state equalized values and/or taxable values, exceed the amounts permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; b. The assessments, including state equalized values and/or taxable values, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; c. The assessments, including taxable values and/or state equalized values, are based upon an erroneous determination of true cash value of that portion of Petitioner’s Property(ies) that are taxable under Michigan law and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and d. The assessment, including state equalized values and/or taxable values, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner, and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection, and due process of law. WHEREFORE, Petitioner moves that this Motion be granted, and Petitioner requests that the Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2026 assessed values, reducing the 2026 taxable values, and requiring the Respondent pay to Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus
Page 3
3 PROOF
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 of 1 Docket #: 25-002049 Party Filing Document Party Filing Document: Petitioner Petitioner If 'other', Identify: File Document Type: fuFile:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF DECEMBER 16 - 30, 2026 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF PROCEDURE FIFI Holdings, LLC, Petitioner, v City Of Berkley, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 25-002049 Please be advised that 25-002049 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General Call commencing December 16, 2026. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be notified at least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not necessarily occur in the order in which the cases are listed below. Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241. Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order will be published. In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of the Tribunal’s website. Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s website for more information.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002049 Page 2 of 3 IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall: a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.). b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures by August 19, 2026. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing Statements by August 19, 2026. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal
Page 3
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 ______________________, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. _____________ ______________________, Respondent. ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX ANSWER 1. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, state the parcel number for the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: ________________________________________________________________ (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Answer Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. ___Admit ____Deny. If denied, the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition is ___ real ___ personal. 3. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, identify the contiguous and non-contiguous parcels by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 4. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, identify the parcel or parcels of personal property that are not located on a parcel of real property under appeal by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 5. ___Admit ___Deny. a. If denied, state when the personal property statements were filed, if at all: ______________________________________________________________ b. On what date did the March Board of Review commence: ______________________________________________________________ 6. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, state the classification of the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: ________________________________________________________________ FIFI Holdings, LLC 25-002049 City of Berkley X X X N/A N/A N/A
Page 2
MTT Docket No. ______________ Page 2 of 4 7. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 8. ___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 9. ___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, state the facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 10. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, in what County are the property or properties located in and what is the address of the property or properties: 11. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, what is the applicable local governmental unit: ________________________________________________________________ 12. ___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 13. If the property’s taxable value is at issue, was there an addition or loss for purposes of establishing the property’s taxable value for the tax year or years at issue? ___Yes ___No. 25-002049 N/A N/A N/A X X X X
Page 3
MTT Docket No. ______________ Page 3 of 4 14. ___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 15. ___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the
Page 4
MTT
Page 5
PROOF
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-002049 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City Of Berkley (OAKLAND) Local Unit of Government/First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Aaron P M.I. Last Name Powers Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 38110 Executive Dr. STE 200 City or Town Westland State Michigan ZIP Code 48185 Telephone Number 734-331-3980 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) MTTappeals@wcaassessing.com Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Aaron P. Powers /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 ______________________, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. _____________ ______________________, Respondent. ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX ANSWER 1. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, state the parcel number for the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: ________________________________________________________________ (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Answer Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. ___Admit ____Deny. If denied, the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition is ___ real ___ personal. 3. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, identify the contiguous and non-contiguous parcels by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 4. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, identify the parcel or parcels of personal property that are not located on a parcel of real property under appeal by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 5. ___Admit ___Deny. a. If denied, state when the personal property statements were filed, if at all: ______________________________________________________________ b. On what date did the March Board of Review commence: ______________________________________________________________ 6. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, state the classification of the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: ________________________________________________________________ FIFI Holdings, LLC 25-002049 City of Berkley X X X N/A N/A N/A
Page 2
MTT Docket No. ______________ Page 2 of 4 7. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 8. ___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 9. ___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, state the facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 10. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, in what County are the property or properties located in and what is the address of the property or properties: 11. ___Admit ___Deny. If denied, what is the applicable local governmental unit: ________________________________________________________________ 12. ___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 13. If the property’s taxable value is at issue, was there an addition or loss for purposes of establishing the property’s taxable value for the tax year or years at issue? ___Yes ___No. 25-002049 N/A N/A N/A X X X X
Page 3
MTT Docket No. ______________ Page 3 of 4 14. ___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 15. ___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the
Page 4
MTT
Page 5
PROOF
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-002049 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City Of Berkley (OAKLAND) Local Unit of Government/First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Aaron P M.I. Last Name Powers Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 38110 Executive Dr. STE 200 City or Town Westland State Michigan ZIP Code 48185 Telephone Number 734-331-3980 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) MTTappeals@wcaassessing.com Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Aaron P. Powers /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL FIF HOLDINGS, LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-002049 CITY OF BERKLEY, Respondent. ___________________________/ PROOF OF SERVICE FOR PROPERTY TAX PETITION I, Lyn Zarem, state that on September 4, 2025, I served a copy of the 2025 Property Tax Petition (with noted docket number), relative to the above-captioned matter: By CERTIFIED MAIL, on: City of Berkley Department of Assessing 3338 Coolidge Highway Berkley, Michigan 48072 Clerk for the City of Berkley 3338 Coolidge Highway Berkley, Michigan 48072 and FIRST-CLASS MAIL, on: Oakland County Director of Equalization Suite 1000W 250 Elizabeth Lake Road Pontiac, Michigan 48341 Oakland County Clerk Building 12E 1200 North Telegraph Road Pontiac, Michigan 48341 Secretary of School Board Berkley Public School District 14501 Talbot Street Oak Park, Michigan 48237
Page 2
2 State Treasurer Michigan Department of Treasury 430 West Allegan Lansing, Michigan 48922 I declare under the penalty of perjury that a statement above is true to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. /s/ Lyn Zarem Property Tax Reduction Services, LLC 37887 West Twelve Mile Road, Suite B Farmington Hills, Michigan 48331 (248) 672-1922
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 _____________________________ MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. _____________________________ Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: _____________________________________________ (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is ___real ___personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as _________________________ 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s ___ March ___ July ___December Board of Review. FIFI HOLDINGS, LLC CITY OF BERKLEY, 25-07-479-033 X Commercial
Page 2
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 2 of 4 8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 10. The property or properties at issue are located in _______________County. The property or properties’ address is: 11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): ________________________________________ 12. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): ________the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values ________the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No ________uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment ________the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 14. The tax year(s) at issue are: _______________________________________ Oakland 2550 12 Mile Road, Berkley, Michigan 48072 City of Berkley 500 South Old Woodward Avenue, Suite 200, Birmingham, Michigan 48009 X 2025
Page 3
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is
Page 4
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 FIFI Holdings, LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 25-002049 City Of Berkley, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: __Tribunal Clerk________ Entered: August 8, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 _____________________________ MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. _____________________________ Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: _____________________________________________ (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is ___real ___personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as _________________________ 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s ___ March ___ July ___December Board of Review. FIFI HOLDINGS, LLC CITY OF BERKLEY, 25-07-479-033 X Commercial
Page 2
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 2 of 4 8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 10. The property or properties at issue are located in _______________County. The property or properties’ address is: 11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): ________________________________________ 12. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): ________the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values ________the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No ________uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment ________the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 14. The tax year(s) at issue are: _______________________________________ Oakland 2550 12 Mile Road, Berkley, Michigan 48072 City of Berkley 500 South Old Woodward Avenue, Suite 200, Birmingham, Michigan 48009 X 2025
Page 3
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is
Page 4
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MOAHR DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization First Name/Company Name M.I. Last Name FIFI Holdings, LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 500 South Old Woodward Avenue, Suite 200 City or Town Birmingham State Michigan ZIP Code 48009 Telephone Number 2486721922 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jschwartz@propertytaxreductionservices.org Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Jay M.I. A. Last Name Schwartz Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 37887 West Twelve Mile Road Suite B City or Town Farmington Hills State Michigan ZIP Code 48331 Telephone Number 248-672-1922 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jschwartz@propertytaxreductionservices.org Section 5: Issue Please designate one: Valuation – Fill out Sections 4, 5, & 6 below Section 6: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing?1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 2550 12 Mile Road Berkley Michigan 48072 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Berkley (OAKLAND) County Oakland If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Section 7: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Section 8: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 25-07-479-033 Classification of Property: Real Commercial Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 469680 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 467780 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 750000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 375000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Section 9: Assessment Information Type of Tax Assessment(s): Assessment Number(s): Check all that is being appealed: Check what action prompted this appeal: If “other,” please explain: Section 10: Special Assessment Information Type of Special Assessment: Did you protest the special assessment at the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? If Yes, what was the date of the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? If No, please explain: Section 11: Classification Information Parcel Number: Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: What do you believe is the property’s classification?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR If improved property, how is the property currently being used? If improved property, for what use was the property designed? Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.