Full record / Respondent Answer 25-002049.pdf

Respondent Answer 25-002049.pdf

Fifi Holdings, LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Berkley, Respondent · 25-002049-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

 

______________________, 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. _____________ 

 

______________________, 

Respondent. 

 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX ANSWER 

 

1. 

___Admit ___Deny. If denied, state the parcel number for the property identified 

on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: 

________________________________________________________________ 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Answer 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

 

2. 

___Admit ____Deny. If denied, the property identified on the Entire Tribunal 

Property Tax Petition is ___ real ___ personal. 

 

3. 

___Admit ___Deny. If denied, identify the contiguous and non-contiguous 

parcels by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

4. 

___Admit ___Deny. If denied, identify the parcel or parcels of personal property 

that are not located on a parcel of real property under appeal by parcel number 

(attach additional page if necessary): 

 

5. 

___Admit ___Deny. 

 

a. If denied, state when the personal property statements were filed, if at all: 

______________________________________________________________ 

b. On what date did the March Board of Review commence: 

______________________________________________________________ 

 

6. 

___Admit ___Deny. If denied, state the classification of the property identified 

on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

FIFI Holdings, LLC

25-002049

City of Berkley

X

X

X

N/A

N/A

N/A

Page 2

MTT Docket No. ______________ 

Page 2 of 4 

 

7. 

___Admit ___Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent 

relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

8. 

___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional 

page if necessary): 

 

 

9. 

___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, state the facts upon 

which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if 

necessary): 

 

 

10. 

___Admit ___Deny. If denied, in what County are the property or properties 

located in and what is the address of the property or properties: 

 

 

11. 

___Admit ___Deny. If denied, what is the applicable local governmental unit: 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

12. 

___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts 

upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if 

necessary): 

 

 

13. 

If the property’s taxable value is at issue, was there an addition or loss for 

purposes of establishing the property’s taxable value for the tax year or years at 

issue? ___Yes ___No. 

 

25-002049

N/A

N/A

N/A

X

X

X

 X

Page 3

MTT Docket No. ______________ 

Page 3 of 4 

 

14. 

___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional 

page if necessary): 

 

 

15. 

___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional 

page if necessary): 

 

 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 

Board of Review are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

Assessed Value

Taxable Value

 

17. 

Respondent contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

State Equalized Value

Taxable Value

 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

State Equalized Value

Taxable Value

 

 

 

 

25-002049

X

 

N/A

2025

$939,360

$469,680

$467,780

2025

$939,360

$469,680

$467,780

2025

0

0

0

Page 4

MTT Docket No. ______________ 

Page 4 of 4 

 

19. 

___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional 

page if necessary): 

 

 

20. 

___Admit ___Deny ___Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate 

facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional 

page if necessary): 

 

 

21. 

List any separate and specific facts upon which Respondent relies to support 

every ground on which Respondent relies and also has the burden of proof 

(attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

22. 

List affirmative defenses and the separate and specific facts upon which 

Respondent relies in support of those affirmative defenses (attach additional 

page if necessary): 

 

 

Signature of Respondent’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Respondent: 

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

Printed Name of Respondent’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Respondent: 

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

Email Address: _________________________________________________________ 

 

Mailing Address: 

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

Telephone Number: _____________________________________________________ 

 

Date: _________________________________________________________________ 

25-002049

 X

Property is assessed at 50% true cash value.

 X

Property is assessed at 50% true cash value.

Property is assessed at 50% true cash value.

WHEREFORE, Respondent, City of Berkley, feels that the case lacks merit and requests the 

Tribunal dismiss the Petition, affirm Respondent’s assessed and taxable values, subject to 

county and state equalization and award Respondent its costs and representation fees. 

/s/ Aaron P. Powers

Aaron P. Powers

MTTappeals@wcaassessing.com

38110 Executive Dr., Ste. 200 

Westland, MI 48185

(734) 331-3980 

October 6, 2025

Page 5

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

 

 

The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and say that she, Haley B. Johnson, placed in the United 

States Mail, postage prepaid, a copy of the following, properly addressed: 

DATE: 

 

August 11, 2025 

DOCUMENT: 

Respondent’s Answer to Petitioner’s Petition 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ADDRESSESSEE(S): 

 

Sarah R. Belloli 

RYAN 

101 West Big Beaver, Suite 945 

Troy, Michigan, 48084 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 _________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Haley B. Johnson 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

August 11, 2025 

 

October 6, 2025

 Jay A. Schwartz 

 Property Tax Reduction Services, LLC 

 37887 West Twelve Mile Road, Suite B 

 Farmington Hills, Michigan 48331 

/s/ Haley B. Johnson

October 6, 2025

PDF reading copy

← View full record